Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2006 Larvicidal Activity of Novaluron, a Chitin Synthesis Inhibitor, Against the Housefly, Musca domestica
Huseyin Cetin, Fedai Erler, Atila Yanikoglu
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

A chitin synthesis inhibitor, novaluron, was evaluated under laboratory conditions for its larvicidal activity against a field population of the housefly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae), by feeding and dipping methods. The concentrations used were 1, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 mg a.i./kg in both methods. The product caused >80% larval mortality at 10 and 20 mg a.i./kg. Of the two methods, feeding was more effective for larvicidal activity at doses above 2.5 mg a.i./kg. After 72 hours, the LC50 and LC90 values were 1.66 and 8.25 mg a.i./kg, respectively, with the feeding method; and 2.72 and 17.88 mg a.i./kg, respectively, using the dipping method. The results showed that the product provided good control of housefly larvae and would greatly reduce adult emergence.

Introduction

The housefly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae) is an important mechanical vector of several bacterial and pathogenic organisms of humans and animals (Chavasse et al. 1999; Emerson et al. 1999). Sasaki et al. (2000) reported that houseflies were shown to spread a deadly strain of Escherichia coli in Japan. Zurek et al. (2001) showed that adult houseflies can transmit Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. In some parts of the world where cholera and typhoid are common, they also transmit these diseases (WHO, 1991). M. domestica is the most common insect species found in homes, horse stables, poultry farms, and ranches.

Because of its importance as a public health pest, many insecticides have been used directly or indirectly in the control of M. domestica. Throughout the world, houseflies have developed resistance to these insecticides. Recently, 10 generations of selection of field-collected houseflies produced a strain that was highly resistant (>150-fold) to spinosad (Shono & Scott, 2003). In Denmark, Kristensen and Jespersen (2003) found resistance toward diflubenzuron, and field populations with some resistance to cyromazine. Many researchers found similar results for other synthetic and biological insecticides (Kaufman et al. 2001; Learmount et al. 2002; Marcon et al. 2003). As levels of insecticide resistance continue to increase, it is ever more important to develop alternative methods and insecticides for controlling the housefly.

Novaluron is a chitin synthesis inhibitor that acts by both ingestion and contact (Ishaaya et al. 1996, 1998). It has been used for controlling a variety of insect pests of field crops (Ishaaya et al. 2003) and of public health (Mulla et al. 2003). Su et al. (2003) reported that novaluron exhibited a high level of activity against Culex mosquitoes. Mulla et al. (2003) showed that novaluron exhibited long-term activity against Aedes aegypti in water-storage containers.

The present study was undertaken to investigate larvicidal activity of novaluron (OSCAR Super® EC-10), against M. domestica under laboratory conditions.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals

A 1% emulsion concentrate of novaluron (OSCAR Super® EC-10) was obtained from Oben Ltd. Sti. Ankara, Turkey. Concentrations for the present study were determined by a series of preliminary studies that yielded between 25 and 95 percent larval mortalities.

One ml formulation was dissolved in 100 ml distilled water (stock solution) and from the stock solution different concentrations; 1, 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 mg a.i./kg were prepared.

Housefly strain

The strain of M. domestica originated from adults collected on a farm in Topcular, Antalya, using a sweep net and colonized at the Biology Department, Faculty of Arts and Science, Akdeniz University. The rearing method was that of Kristensen and Jespersen (2003) with some modifications. Adults of M. domestica were fed milk and dry sugar. Bran and milk was prepared at a weight ratio of 1:3, and 50 g of this mixture was placed on a plastic plate as an oviposition site.

Feeding method for the bioassay test of the larvae

Feeding with novularon was carried out according to the method described by Kristensen and Jespersen (2003) with some modifications. To test the toxicity of the product, portions of artificial larval rearing medium (one portion: 400 g wheat bran, 200 g lucerne meal, 10 g baker's yeast, 500 ml whole milk, and 500 ml water) were treated with different concentrations of novaluron. Twenty grams of medium were put in a container and 2.5 ml of water containing novaluron or water alone was added and mixed into the medium. Twenty-five newly laid housefly eggs were placed on a piece of wet black filter paper that fit into a beer bottle cap. The eggs adhered well to the filter paper, and the caps with the eggs were placed inverted on top of the media in the containers. After 24–36 hours eggs hatched and larva began to feed. The number of emerging flies was recorded 3 weeks after the egg-seeding date and the larvicidal activity was recorded as the percentage of hatched eggs that were unable to develop into adults. All larvicidal assays were carried out at 12:12 (L:D) photoperiod, 60 ± 10% RH and 26 ± 2 °C in the laboratory until emergence of all flies. Five concentrations of novaluron were used, plus a control. Four replicates of twenty-five larvae each were used for each treatment. The experiment was repeated three times on subsequent days.

Dipping method for the bioassay test of the larvae

The dipping method was applied according to the method described by Sukontason et al. (2004) with some modifications. All tests were run at 12:12 (L:D) photoperiod, 60 ± 10% RH, and 26 ± 2 °C. First instar larvae, 0–2 hours old, were used in the assays. Four replicates of twenty-five larvae each group were used at each concentration level. The experiments were repeated on subsequent days. The larvae of each group were gently dipped into insecticide solutions with a dip net, whereas those of the controls were dipped in tap water. After being dipped for exactly 30 sec, the larvae were transferred to the rearing jars containing food. After the larvae had been dipped, they were reared to determine the success of emergence. The number of emerging flies was recorded during the 3 week-test period.

Statistical analysis

The larval mortality data were corrected for control mortality by the formula of Abbott (1925). ANOVA was carried out with SPSS 10.0. Means were compared with Duncan's multiple range test (p<0.05) and LC50, LC90 values were calculated by using the EPA computer probit analysis program (Version 1.5).

Results and Discussion

The larvicidal activity of novaluron against larvae of M. domestica is presented in Table 1. Larval mortalities increased significantly (P<0.05) with dose using both treatment methods. Concentrations of 10 and 20 mg a.i./kg resulted in over 80% larval mortality in both assays. Mortality was generally greater in those larvae treated by feeding as compared to the dipping method. Some of emerging adults showed morphological abnormalities (malformations of wing, leg, head, thorax and abdomen) at these concentrations. When larvae were fed with the concentration of 20 mg a.i./kg, they completed only the first instar, however, and died during ecdysis.

Table 1

Larvicidal activity of novaluron against Musca domestica

From the probit analysis the LC50 and LC90 were 1.66 and 8.25 mg a.i./kg, respectively, for feeding assays; and 2.72 and 17.88 mg a.i./kg, respectively, for dipping assays.

Many different IGRs have been tested against the housefly. Webb and Wildey (1986) reported that diflubenzuron was effective in controlling strains of housefly that were resistant to carbamate, organophosphorus, organochlorine, and pyrethroid insecticides on a United Kingdom pig farm; 416 mg/m2 applied to slurry pots in pig weaning stalls gave effective control for 2–4 weeks after application. Howard and Wall (1995) tested triflumuron against the housefly under laboratory conditions and found that a concentration of 1 milliunits (mU)/gram of triflumuron applied topically to adult females of M. domestica resulted in egg hatch inhibition greater than 95%. Similarly, Wright et al. (1975) found that 0.1 and 1 mg/kg of TH 6040 incorporated in rhinoceros feed inhibited development of M. domestica in the feces.

The data obtained from the present study clearly indicate that novaluron could provide excellent larval control of M. domestica. In addition, it was found that both feeding and dipping application methods had high larvicidal activity at the higher concentrations, 10 and 20 mg a.i./kg, and both of them could be used in the control of housefly. These results suggest that novaluron may be used in housefly control programs. Further assays regarding the effect of novaluron under field conditions should be followed.

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Dr. Chris Curtis (University of London, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, England) for his constructive comments and suggestions, and to the Scientific Projects Administration Unit of Akdeniz University, Antalya for financial support.

References

1.

WS Abbott . 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology 18: 265–267. Google Scholar

2.

DC Chavasse , RP Shier , OA Murphy , SRA Huttly , SN Cousens , T Akhtar . 1999. Impact of fly control on childhood diarrhoea in Pakistan: community-randomised trial. Lancet 353: 22–25. Google Scholar

3.

PM Emerson , SW Lindsay , GEL Walraven , H Faal , C Bogh , K Lowe , RL Bailey . 1999. Effect of fly control on trachoma and diarrhoea. Lancet 353: 1401–1403. Google Scholar

4.

EPA Probit Analysis , Version 1.5.  http://www.epa.gov/nerleerd/stat2.htm  Google Scholar

5.

J Howard , R Wall . 1995. The effects of triflumuron, a chitin synthesis inhibitor, on the housefly, Musca domestica (Diptera, Muscidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 85: 71–77. Google Scholar

6.

I Ishaaya, S Yablonski, Z Mendelson, Y Mansour, AR Horowitz. 1996. Novaluron (MCW-275), a novel benzoylphenyl urea, suppressing developing stages of lepidopteran, whitefly and leafminer pests. Brighton Crop Protection Conference -Pests and Diseases pp. 1013–1020. London: BCPC Google Scholar

7.

I Ishaaya, N Damme, L Tirry. 1998. Novaluron, optimization and use for the control of the beet armyworm and the geenhouse whitefly. Brighton Crop Protection Conference- Pest and Diseases pp. 1013–1020. London: BCPC Google Scholar

8.

I Ishaaya , S Kontsedalov , AR Horowitz . 2003. Novaluron (Rimon), a Novel IGR: Potency and Cross Resistance. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 54: 157–164. Google Scholar

9.

PE Kaufman , JG Scott , DA Rutz . 2001. Monitoring insecticide resistance in house flies (Diptera: Muscidae) from New York dairies. Pest Management Science 57: 514–521. Google Scholar

10.

M Kristensen , JB Jespersen . 2003. Larvicide resistance in Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) populations in Denmark and establishment of resistant laboratory strains. Journal of Economic Entomology 96: 1300–1306. Google Scholar

11.

J Learmount , P Chapman , A MacNicoll . 2002. Impact of an insecticide resistance strategy for house fly (Diptera: Muscidae) control in intensive animal units in the United Kingdom. Journal of Economic Entomology 95: 1245–1250. Google Scholar

12.

PCRG Marcon , GD Thomas , BD Siegfried , JB Campbell , SR Skoda . 2003. Resistance status of house flies (Diptera: Muscidae) from southeastern Nebraska beef cattle feedlots to selected insecticides. Journal of Economic Entomology 96: 10167–1020. Google Scholar

13.

MS Mulla , U Thavara , A Tawatsin , J Chompoosri , M Zaim , TY Su . 2003. Laboratory and field evaluation of novaluron, a new insect growth regulator (IGR), against Aedes aegypti. Journal of Vector Ecology 28: 241–254. Google Scholar

14.

T Sasaki , M Kobayashi , N Agui . 2000. Epidemiological potential of excretion and regurgitation by Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) in the dissemination of Escherichia coli O157: H7 to food. Journal of Medical Entomology 37: 945–949. Google Scholar

15.

T Shono , JG Scott . 2003. Spinosad resistance in the housefly, Musca domestica , is due to a recessive factor on autosome 1. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 75: 1–7. Google Scholar

16.

SPSS Base 10.0 1999. Application Guide , SPSS, Inc.  http://www.spss.com/spss/family.cfm?source=homepage&hpzone=tech Google Scholar

17.

TY Su , M Zaim , MS Mulla . 2003. Laboratory and field evaluation of novaluron, a new insect growth regulator (IGR), against Culex mosquitoes. Journal of American Mosquito Control Association 19: 408–418. Google Scholar

18.

KL Sukontason , N Boonchu , K Sukontason , W Choochote . 2004. Effects of eucalyptol on house fly (Diptera: Muscidae) and blow fly (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de S Paulo 46: 97–101. Google Scholar

19.

DP Webb , KB Wildey . 1986. Evaluation of the larvicide diflubenzuron for the control of a multi-insecticide resistant strain of housefly (Musca domestica) on a UK pig farm. International Pest Control 28: 64–66. Google Scholar

20.

WHO. 1991. Insect and rodent control through environmental management: A community action programme. Geneva, Switzerland. 29–34 PP. Google Scholar

21.

JE Wright , DD Oehler , JH Johnson . 1975. Control of house fly and stable fly breeding in rhinoceros dung with an insect growth regulator used as a feed additive. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 11: 522–524. Google Scholar

22.

L Zurek , SS Denning , C Schal , DW Watson . 2001. Vector competence of Musca domestica (Diptera: Muscidae) for Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. Journal of Medical Entomology 38: 333–335. Google Scholar
Creative Commons Attribution 2.5
Huseyin Cetin, Fedai Erler, and Atila Yanikoglu "Larvicidal Activity of Novaluron, a Chitin Synthesis Inhibitor, Against the Housefly, Musca domestica," Journal of Insect Science 6(50), 1-4, (1 December 2006). https://doi.org/10.1673/031.006.5001
Received: 21 July 2006; Accepted: 18 August 2006; Published: 1 December 2006
JOURNAL ARTICLE
4 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top