Translator Disclaimer
1 September 2008 Quinoa, Chenopodium quinoa, Provides a New Host for Native Herbivores in Northern Europe: Case Studies of the Moth, Scrobipalpa atriplicella, and the Tortoise Beetle, Cassida nebulosa
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The Andean grain, quinoa, Chenopodium quinoa Willd. (Caryophyllales: Amaranthaceae), is gaining increasing attention as a future food and fodder crop in Denmark and other parts of Europe. Prior to 2005, pest problems in the crop were negligible in Denmark, however native insects may become adapted to this new host. Herbivores feeding on the closely related and very common weed in arable crops Chenopodium album L. present a special risk. In 2006 there was a heavy attack of Scrobipalpa atriplicella (Röslerstamm) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) larvae in the maturing inflorescence of C. quinoa. Gelechiidae are the most important pests on C. quinoa in the Andean region. In 2007 another herbivore on C. album, the tortoise beetle Cassida nebulosa L. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), was a serious problem on C. quinoa in southern Jutland. This is the first published record of these two pests on C. quinoa. The future pest status of C. quinoa in northern Europe is discussed.

Introduction

One of the most important Andean grain crops is quinoa, Chenopodium quinoa Willd. (Caryophyllales: Amaranthaceae). The production of C. quinoa is linked to its high nutritional value, and recently the market demand both internally and externally has increased rapidly (Jacobsen et al. 2006). C. quinoa has been grown on the University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Life Sciences experimental farms in Taastrup for over ten years. The crop has desirable characteristics including tolerance to adverse growing conditions and balanced nutritional qualities (Jacobsen et al. 2003a,b; 2007), and varieties have been selected that are adapted to the cool temperate climate of Denmark. C. quinoa is still not grown commercially in Denmark, but experimental trials and plots for propagation of material are being sown at research stations and by farmers around the country.

Until 2005 no major insect pest problems were observed in the crop, however, in 2006 there was a heavy attack of moths in the maturing inflorescence of C. quinoa and in 2007 an attack by chrysomelids on the vegetative stage of the crop.

In its area of origin several herbivorous insects feed on and can damage C. quinoa during seed germination up through harvest and seed storage in production areas of South America. The most serious of the Andean pests are Eurysacca quinoae Povolný and E. melanocampta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) found in Peru and Bolivia that are responsible for yield losses up to 50% or more (Mujica 1993; Rasmussen et al. 2003). Other major insect pests include a group of cutworms (Noctuidae) and phytophagous and pollen-eating beetles including Chrysomelidae and Curculionidae (Rasmussen et al. 2003). Many C. quinoa pests are polyphagous, suggesting that a wide range of potential pests exist if C. quinoa is implemented as a crop in Europe. Currently reports from Northern Europe include Cnephasia sp. (Tortricidae Lepidoptera), Aphis fabae L. (Aphididae Homoptera) and Lygus rugulipennis Poppius (Miridae Hemiptera) (Gesinski 2000; Jacobsen 1993), and from Southern Europe Epitrix subcrinita Le Conte (Chrysomelidae, Coleoptera), and leafhoppers (Cicadellidae, Homoptera) (Rasmussen et al. 2003). This paper is the first published report of Scrobipalpa atnplicella (Röslerstamm) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) and Cassida nebulosa L. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on C. quinoa.

Materials and Methods

In late August 2006, panicles of infested C. quinoa were collected at Taastrup, located 15 km east of Copenhagen, latitude 55.1°N. At this point in time the whole field was heavily infested. Larvae were feeding in a silken gallery between young leaves, flowers, and seeds that were spun together. The C. quinoa being grown was lines from a breeding programme, based on crossings of Danish cultivais KVL- Q52 and KVL-Q37, with Bolivian large seeded Real varieties. Panicles were transferred to three ventilated boxes (base: 30 by 22 cm, height: 12 cm), each holding 5–10 panicles. The bottoms of the boxes were covered with a layer of fine vermiculite. In each box a 9 cm petri dish with filter papers was regularly wetted to provide moisture. Boxes were kept in a climate cabinet providing temperatures of 22 ± 1 °C day and 12 ± 1 °C night (L: D 20:4), simulating Danish summer conditions. Larvae were provided with fresh C. quinoa heads for feeding. After two weeks boxes were transferred to a climate cabinet providing 7 ± 1 °C both day and night with L:D of 8:16, simulating winter conditions. By November, pupae were observed, and by early January boxes were returned to temperatures of 22 ± 1 °C day and 12 ± 1 °C night (L: D 20:4). By mid January adults began to emerge. At least 100 adults were collected from the rearing boxes. All were identified as S. atriplicella by Dr. Ole Karsholt, The Zoological Museum of Copenhagen.

In June and July 2007, experimental fields of C. quinoa in Southern Jutland (the advisory service of “Sønderjysk Landboforening”, Lat: N 55° 9′ “Long: E 9° 13”) were observed to be severely attacked by tortoise beetles. Different larval instars and adults were collected and identified to be C. nebulosa (EPPO 2007; Swiêtojañska 2005).

Results and Discussion

All moth larvae collected in 2006 were identified as being S. atriplicella (Karsholt and Nielsen 1998; Karsholt 2004) It is a common species in Denmark, Finland, Sweden, the Netherlands, Belgium and the British Isles (Bland et al. 2002; De Prins 1998; Jansen 1999; Karsholt et al. 1998). Larvae are found on Chenopodium album L., C. ficifolium, Atriplex prostrata, A. longipes praecox, A. littoralis, Atriplex spp. and all kinds of varieties of Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris (De Prins 1998; Jansen 1999; Fritzsche and Keilbach 1994). S. atriplicella has also been recorded from Ohio, USA (Metzler and Zebold 1995). In Mexico it is a pest on the cultivated plants of huauzontle (Chenopodium nuttalliae [C. berlandieri subsp. nuttalliae]) and found feeding on C. album (Bautista-Martínez et al. 1995).

In The Netherlands the first generation of adults has its peak in the beginning of May and flies until June. A second generation flies from early July with a peak in August (Jansen 1999). Assuming that the collected larvae were offspring of a second generation, this justifies a cold period during rearing. There was no significant difference in the severity of the S. atriplicella infestation in the different breeding lines. It is difficult to estimate the potential yield loss, but as no seeds were seen in any of the C. quinoa lines from the crossing programme the pest seems to be able to perform a serious attack on C. quinoa. In 2007, C. nebulosa caused extensive leaf damage in experimental plots of the C. quinoa line KVL-Q52 in Southern Jutland. The species feeds on Chenopodiaceae, is commonly found on C. album, and has pest status on beet (EPPO 2007). There were no beet fields in the vicinity of the attacked C. quinoa, and the preceding crop had been maize, but the pest was observed in C. album in neighbouring cereal crops (Susanne Kjær-Hansen, personal communication). In the valleys of southern Peru, the presence of 10 to 15 adults of Diabrotica sp. (Chrysomelidae) per plant caused yield losses of more than 20% in the 1998–1999 season (Rasmussen et al. 2003). However, in this case, the crop recovered quite well from the leaf infestation by harvest (Susanne Kjær-Hansen, pers. comm.).

Jacobsen et al. (2003b) hypothesised that naturally occurring herbivorous complexes with some level of oligophagy may constitute a wide range of potential pests if C. quinoa is implemented as a crop in regions outside its origin. After more than ten years with C. quinoa being grown in Denmark, it appears that native herbivores may now be adapting to, and opportunistically attacking, C. quinoa, which represent an abundant and underutilized food source in their habitat.

Both species feed on C. album (Williams 1963, Nagasawa and Matsuda 2005) and on beet (EPPO 2007; Fritzsche et al. 1994), but this is the first recorded observation of a serious attack by S. atriplicella on C. quinoa. Mines have been seen all years, but never a similar attack of larvae as reported here. Similarly, insignificant infestations of C. nebulosa were observed in earlier years, but the attack in 2007 was the first serious one. The close relationship between C. quinoa and C. album and their co-occurrence in the same fields can significantly ease the transition from this weed to C. quinoa. C. album is very common at the experimental station in Taastrup, where it is found within and around the C. quinoa fields. The association of both pests with beet, which is a widely grown crop, may further raise the risk of transition to C. quinoa.

Several factors suggest that S. atriplicella has the potential to become a pest: a) the major pests in the countries of origin are also Gelechidae, b) the niche of S. atriplicella is very similar to that of its Latin American relatives, c) one of S. atriplicella's hosts, C. album, is a common weed in agricultural fields, and d) C. album belongs to the same genus as C. quinoa, and physically C. quinoa resembles a large C. album.

Evidence from Chrysomelid infestations in Peru (Rasmussen et al. 2003) suggests that C. nebulosa will only be an important pest in years of high densities, and that choice of variety can control this pest (Yábar et al. 2002).

Although the commercial importance of C. quinoa as a crop in Denmark and in other European countries is currently negligible, its potential is great, and so is the interest for using this high quality product as both food and animal fodder. It is therefore worthwhile to define the potential damaging effect of new pests, in order to look for adequate means of pest management for this new crop. Should S. atriplicella and other pests such as C. nebulosa become established as a pest on C. quinoa, methods of control, including the possible means of biological control, would need further study. Even in C. quinoa's countries of origin, many aspects of the biology of its major pests, the Gelechiids, remain poorly understood.

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to Dr. Ole Karsholt, Zoological Museum, Copenhagen for identification of S. atriplicella. Thanks to Jan Martin and Hanna Hansen, for assistance with first identification and rearing of the collected larvae. Thanks to two anonymous referees for suggestions to improve the paper. Thanks to The Directorate for Food, Fisheries and Agri Business and the Fund for Organic Farming for financial support.

References

1.

N Bautista-Martinez , E Prado Beltran , JL Carrillo Sanchez , G Vejar Cota . 1995. Morphology, biology and habits of immature stages of the huauzontle borer Scrobipalpa atriplicella (Roeslerstamm) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Southwestern Entomologist 20: 357–365. Google Scholar

2.

KP Bland, MFV Corley, AM Emmet, RJ Heckford, P Huemer, JR Langmaid, SM Palmer, MS Parsons, LM Pitkin, T Rutten, K Sattler, ANB Simpson, PH Sterling. 2002. The moths and butterflies of Great Britain and Ireland. In: AM Emmet , JR Langmaid , editors. 4: 2 Gelechiidae , pp. 224–254. Harley Books. Google Scholar

3.

W De Prins . 1998. Catalogue of the Lepidoptera of Belgium. Studiedocumenten van het Koninklijk Belgisch Instituut voor Natuurwetenschappen 92: 1–236. Google Scholar

4.

European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Bulletin 2007. Leaf eating insects in beet. 37: 74–76. Available online at:  www.eppo.orgGoogle Scholar

5.

R Fritzsche, R Keilbach. 1994. Die Pflanzen-, Vorrats- und Materialschädlinge Mitteleuropas. Gustav Fischer Verlag. Google Scholar

6.

K Gesinski. In: SE Jacobsen , A Mujica , Z Portillo , editors. 2000. Test of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa. Willd.) in Poland. Memorios, Primer Taller Internacional sobre QuinuaRecursos Geneticos y Sistemas de Producción 5: 10–14 May. 1999. Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, Lima, Peru. Centro Intemacional de la Papa. Google Scholar

7.

SE Jacobsen. 1993. Quinoa: A Novel Crop for European Agriculture Ph.D. Thesis Denmark. The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University. Google Scholar

8.

SE Jacobsen , A Mujica , CR Jensen . 2003a. The resistance of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to adverse abiotic factors. Food Review International 19: 99–109. Google Scholar

9.

SE Jacobsen , A Mujica , R Ortiz . 2003b. The global potential for quinoa and other Andean crops. Food Review International 19: 139–148. Google Scholar

10.

SE Jacobsen, D Rodriguez, A Mujica, A Canahua, F Amachi, S Andersen. 2006. The role of quinoa and other crops in the Andean desert regions. Mountain Forum Bulletin July. 2006. 8–10. Available online at:  http://www.mtnforum.org/rs/pub/bulletins/mf-bulletin-2006-07.pdfGoogle Scholar

11.

SE Jacobsen , C Monteras , LJ Corcuera , LA Bravo , JL Christiansen , A Mujica . 2007. Frost resistance mechanisms in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). European Journal of Agronomy 26: 471–75. Google Scholar

12.

M Jansen . 1999. The genus Scrobipalpa in the Netherlands (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Nederlandse Faunistische Mededelingen 9: 29–78. Google Scholar

13.

O Karsholt. In: O Karsholt, EJ van Nieukerken, editors. 2004. Families Acanthopteroctetidae, Axiidae, Castniidae, Cossidae, Drepanidae, Eriocottidae, Eriocraniidae, Gelechiidae, Heterogynidae, Limacodidae, Lypusidae, Micropterigidae, Roeslerstammiidae, Somabrachyidae, Uraniidae. Lepidoptera, Moths. Fauna Europaea version 1.3 Available online at  http://www.faunaeur.orgGoogle Scholar

14.

O Karsholt , PS Nielsen . 1998. Revideret katalog over de danske Sommerfugle. Entomologisk Forening og Lepidopterologisk Forening, Copenhagen. 144 pp. Google Scholar

15.

E Metzler , A Zebold . 1995. Twenty-eight Species of Moths New to Ohio from Huffman Prairie, Greene County (Lepidoptera). Ohio Journal of Science 95: 240–242. Google Scholar

16.

A Mujica . 1993. Cultivo de quinua. Institute Nacional de Investigatión Agraria, Lima 130 pp. Google Scholar

17.

A Nagasawa , K Matsuda . 2005. Effects of feeding experience on feeding responses to spinach in Cassida nebulosa L. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology 40: 83–89. Google Scholar

18.

C Rasmussen , A Lagnaoui , P Esbjerg . 2003. Advances in the knowledge of quinoa pests. Food Review International 19: 61–75. Google Scholar

19.

S Swiêtojañska . 2005. Comparative description of first instar larvae of Cassida nobilis Linnaeus, 1758 and Cassida vittata Villers, 1789 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cassidinae). Genus International Journal of Invertebrate Taxonomy 16: 49–68. Google Scholar

20.

JT Williams . 1963. Chenopodium album L. The Journal of Ecology 51: 711–725. Google Scholar

21.

E Yábar , E Gianoli , ER Echegaray . 2002. Insect pests and natural enemies in two varieties of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) at Cusco, Peru. Journal of Applied Entomology 126: 275–280. Google Scholar
This is an open access paper. We use the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license that permits unrestricted use, provided that the paper is properly attributed.
Lene Sigsgaard, Sven Erik Jacobsen, and Jørgen Lindskrog Christiansen "Quinoa, Chenopodium quinoa, Provides a New Host for Native Herbivores in Northern Europe: Case Studies of the Moth, Scrobipalpa atriplicella, and the Tortoise Beetle, Cassida nebulosa," Journal of Insect Science 8(50), 1-4, (1 September 2008). https://doi.org/10.1673/031.008.5001
Received: 19 September 2007; Accepted: 1 November 2007; Published: 1 September 2008
JOURNAL ARTICLE
4 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top