Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2009 Geographic Variation in Host-Specificity and Parasitoid Pressure of an Herbivore (Geometridae) Associated with the Tropical Genus Piper (Piperaceae)
Heidi Connahs, Genoveva Rodríguez-Castañeda, Toni Walters, Thomas Walla, Lee Dyer
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The extraordinary diversity of tropical herbivores may be linked to hostplant specialization driven in part by variation in pressure from natural enemies. We quantified levels of host-specificity and parasitoid attack for the specialist herbivore, Eois (Geometridae). The goals of this research were to examine: 1) whether Eois are specialized on the genus Piper (Piperaceae) and if hostplant specialization varies geographically; 2) whether Eois are equally vulnerable to parasitoid attack across different geographic regions and by the same parasitoid families; and 3) whether parasitism levels vary with precipitation and elevation. Based on over 15,000 rearings, we found Eois caterpillars feeding exclusively on Piper. However, we did not detect geographic differences in host-specificity; each Eois species fed on an average of two Piper species. Parasitism levels of Eois varied significantly with climate and topography; Eois were most vulnerable to parasitoid attack in moist versus dry and wet forests and at low versus high elevations. The diversity of parasitoid families reared from Eois was greater in Ecuador and Costa Rica than in Panama, where parasitoids were primarily in the family Braconidae. The quantitative evidence for host-specificity provides support for the hypothesis that Eois are specialized on Piper. Our results also reveal that Eois are exposed to a mosaic of potential selective pressures due to variation in parasitoid attack over a large spatial scale.

Introduction

A major goal of evolutionary ecology is to identify selective forces driving the evolution of specialization (Ehrlich and Raven 1964; Bernays and Graham 1988; Jaenike 1990). Most plant-feeding insects are relatively specialized, feeding on a few related plant genera or on plants belonging in a single family (Bernays and Graham 1988; Gratton and Welter 1999). Numerous hypotheses have been proposed to explain the advantages of specialization. In their seminal paper, Ehrlich and Raven (1964) postulated that herbivore specialization is an adaptation to specific host-plant secondary metabolites. An alternative view is that specialist herbivores benefit by escaping natural enemies or sequestering toxic plant compounds for their own defenses (Bernays and Graham 1988; Dyer 1995; Gratton and Welter 1999; Termonia et al. 2002; Vend et al. 2005). Causal explanations of high herbivore specificity in the tropics are not well developed, but it is widely accepted that top-down and bottom-up forces can act in concert to influence herbivore populations and diet breadth (Price et al. 1980; Hunter and Price 1992; Forkner and Hunter 2000; Denno et al. 2005). One hypothesis to explain the putative high proportion of specialized insect herbivores focuses on tritrophic interactions and the concept that variation in plant defenses and pressure from natural enemies drive herbivores to specialize (Dyer 1995; Gratton and Welter 1999; Dyer and Coley 2002; Singer and Stireman 2005; Dyer et al. 2007). Empirical evidence suggests that pressure from natural enemies is more intense in the tropics (Jeanne 1979; Dyer and Coley 2002) and tropical plants are chemically ‘nastier’ due to a higher diversity of secondary compounds (Miller and Hanson 1989; Gauld and Gaston 1994; Coley and Barone 1996; Dyer and Coley 2002). Thompson (1988) proposed that geographic variation in trophic interactions could lead to locally adapted populations that follow unique and divergent evolutionary trajectories. Here, we argue that geographic variation in hostplant quality and natural enemy attack may provide a patchwork of selective pressures that promote herbivore specialization in tropical habitats.

If latitudinal gradients in diversity and specialization exist, then tropical forests are likely to be cradles of highly specialized interactions (McKenna and Farrell 2006). Within the tropics, geographic regions can include a variety of climatic conditions and are often composed of a mosaic of plant and animal assemblages, ranging from lowland dry and wet forests to montane tropical cloud forests. In the Neotropics, such topographic diversity and climatic variation can produce heterogeneous selective pressures across relatively short geographic distances. For example, plants in high rainfall forests are thought to be better defended against herbivores than plants in drier forests, due to greater leaf longevity, mechanical toughness and lower nutritional value (Coley and Aide 1991). It is also possible that natural enemies increase with greater rainfall and reduced climate variability, causing lower herbivore density in wetter tropical forests (Coley and Barone 1996; Stireman et al. 2005; Dyer 2007). Changes in plant characteristics along rainfall or altitudinal gradients might have important effects on herbivore specialization and potential coevolutionary relationships with their hostplants and natural enemies.

It has been argued that the traditional approach for investigating the importance of top-down and bottom-up forces on herbivore populations has been unidimensional, with most studies focusing on a single site (Gripenberg and Roslin 2007). The goal of this study was to take a broad spatial approach to examine variation in measures of host specificity for larvae of the common and widely distributed genus Eois (Geometridae), an herbivore that utilizes the species rich plant genus Piper (Piperaceae). Further, we examined the incidence of parasitoid attack for Eois with changes in elevation and precipitation, as well as across geographic regions. Evidence for variation in parasitism and host specificity lends support to the hypothesis that specialization in the tropics is driven by spatial variation in tritrophic interactions.

To investigate spatial variation in host specificity and parasitism of Eois, we used data sets including more than 15,000 individual Eois caterpillars, reared either to adult or parasitoid, from forests in Costa Rica, Panama and Ecuador. Furthermore, we quantified hostplant specificity using two measures and compared levels of Piper specialization across geographic regions. Specifically, we addressed the following questions: 1) How specialized are Eois and does this specialization vary geographically? 2) Is there geographic variation in parasitism rates of Eois? 3) Do parasitism rates vary with elevation and precipitation; and 4) Are Eois vulnerable to attack from the same parasitoid families at different sites? Based on the known natural history of this system, as well as on theoretical considerations, we made the following predictions: 1) Eois are highly specialized on particular species within the genus Piper, 2) Herbivore specialization and parasitism rates vary geographically; 3) Parasitism is higher in wet forests due to greater plant defenses that prolong caterpillar development, thus increasing their exposure to parasitoids (Benrey and Denno 1997); 4) Parasitism will decrease with elevation due to the negative effects of cold temperatures on parasitoids (Mueller and Schmid-Hempel 1993); and 5) Eois will be attacked by the same parasitoid families at each site.

Materials and Methods

Study system

Piperaceae is one of the most diverse plant families in the Neotropics and includes Piper, which ranks among the top five species-rich genera in tropical rain forests (Gentry 1993; Greig 2004; Jaramillo 2006). Piper has a pantropical distribution with nearly 2000 described species though its greatest diversity is found in Neotropical lowland forests (Jaramillo 2006, Quijano-Abril et al. 2006) particularly in the wet areas of the Andes (Greig 2004; Marquis 2004). Relatively few species of Piper are widely distributed and it has been suggested that their fragmented distribution patterns are related to historical tectonic events (Quijano-Abril et al. 2006). Plants in this genus exhibit a diverse range of growth forms, including vines, herbs, shrubs and small trees and occur in a wide range of habitats, from highly disturbed areas to the deep shade of the understory, most often in moist habitats Jaramillo 2006; Tebbs 1989). Piper species contain a high diversity of phytochemicals; in the 112 species that have been investigated, researchers have identified 667 different secondary metabolites, many of which are deterrent to herbivores (Dyer et al. 2004a). Some of these compounds, such as imides and amides, are toxic to generalist herbivores (Dyer et al. 2003, 2004b); certain Piper species can produce up to 37 different imides/amides (Dyer et al. 2004a). The remarkable diversity of Piper compounds may thus exert strong pressure on herbivores to specialize (Dyer et al. 2003). Piper has been the focus of considerable research (reviewed by Dyer and Palmer 2004), and the arthropod communities associated with this genus show great potential as model study systems.

Table 1.

Descriptions of collecting sites.

t01_01.gif

Caterpillars in the genus Eois are the most frequently encountered herbivores on Piper. Eois is one of the largest genera in the subfamily Larentiinae (Geometridae) and is noted for its species richness with 257 species reported worldwide (Scoble 1999; Brehm and Fiedler 2005) although many more likely await discovery. The associated distribution of Eois and Piper extends from Mexico to Chile and Argentina (Scoble 1999), where they occur in lowland and highland forests across a range of climatic conditions. Eois are generally considered to be weak dispersers (Brehm 2000) and caterpillars often occur at densities causing high levels of damage; sometimes completely defoliating young plants (all authors, pers. obs.). Eois caterpillars are relatively small, approximately 13–20 mm in their final instar and are mostly cryptic in coloration. Parasitoids are important agents of mortality for insect larvae (Hawkins et al. 1997) and Eois are attacked by a suite of parasitoids including wasps primarily in the families, Braconidae and Ichneumonidae and flies in the family Tachinidae.

Study sites

Caterpillars were collected and reared from forests in Costa Rica, Panama and Ecuador that represent geographic regions that are separated by large distances and have a distinct evolutionary and geological history, including the rising of the Isthmus of Panama and the formation of the Ecuadorian Andes. These forests differed in elevation and climate, and were surveyed for different durations (see Table 1 for site details).

Collection methods

Caterpillar collections were carried out in Costa Rica from 1995–2007, Ecuador from 2000–2007 and in Panama from 2003 to 2005. In Costa Rica and Ecuador, caterpillars were collected from Piper plants either haphazardly, or by intensive sampling within 10m diameter plots. Leaves from individual Piper plants were collected and surveyed for caterpillars or eggs of Eois. In Panama, sampling was conducted by examining Piper plants present at each site, using fresh leaf damage and frass as cues for locating Eois caterpillars. On Barro Colorado Island, extensive searches were conducted on Piper aequale Vahl. and Piper schiedeanum Steud., since Eois are abundant on these plants. Only third to fifth (final) instars were included in statistical analyses across study sites.

Caterpillars were reared in plastic bags or cups in ambient conditions and fed fresh leaves as needed until pupation. Each caterpillar collected was assigned a unique number and logged into a database; recorded information included hostplant species, larval stage, collection date, locale, and for Ecuador, the site and altitude of the plot. Piper plants and Eois caterpillars were identified either to species or to morphospecies. We created digital images of Eois caterpillars throughout their development and recorded changes in coloration between instars to assist in morphospecies identification. Voucher specimens of Eois adults are deposited at the Smithsonian Institute, while parasitoids are in the collections of J. Stireman (Tachinidae; Wright State University), J. Whitfield (Braconidae: Microgasterinae; University of Illinois), and S. Shaw (Meteorinae and Ichneumonidae; University of Wyoming).

Statistical Analyses

SAS (9.1) statistical software was used for all analyses. Associations between incidence of parasitism and categorical abiotic variables were assessed using logit models and two-way contingency tables. Incidence of parasitism (a dichotomous variable) included only data for which either a parasitoid or a moth emerged from a collected caterpillar. Levels of parasitism were calculated as the percentage of parasitoids reared from the total number of results (emerged adults and parasitoids). For analyses of parasitoid diversity, parasitoid wasps were separated by family as they exhibit a range of differences in their feeding ecology (Harvey and Strand 2002).

Hostplant specificity of Eois caterpillars was quantified using several methods. The traditional measure is the average number of plant species on which each Eois morphospecies was collected. This measure was supplemented with a Chao2 estimate, (Colwell and Coddington 1994) to estimate the number of Piper host species expected for an Eois species. Chao2 provides good predictive power for presence-absence data with small sample sizes. We also use modifications of Whittaker's index of χdiversity as a proxy for measuring specialization (Dyer et al. 2007) across Piper species. Specialization at the level of plant family was compared between Eois and other Neotropical Lepidoptera larvae using modifications of Whittaker's χdiversity index.

Results

Our Neotropical rearing database, which includes over 50,000 individual plant-caterpillar collections representing 95 plant families and 29 families of Lepidoptera, has produced 15,034 records for Eois (see Table 2 for Piper species). The results reveal that Eois is associated exclusively with Piper, and furthermore, that each Eois species is restricted to an average of approximately 2 species of Piper (Figure 1). We have reared 72 Eois morphospecies from Ecuador, 23 from Costa Rica and 6 from Panama. These were collected on 72 species of Piper (42 known species and 30 morphospecies). When we compared Eois species turnover per Piper species across geographic regions we found that values of host specificity are marginally greater in Ecuador than in Panama and Costa Rica (Figure 2). We also contrasted Eois hostplant specificity at the family level with data collected for other Macrolepidoptera. We obtained xdiversity values of 1 for Eois and 0.86–0.95 for the remaining Macrolepidoptera, where 1 represents the highest level of host specificity (association with a single family).

Table 2.

List of Piper plants sampled that are known to species

t02a_01.gif

con't

t02b_01.gif

In the lowlands (below 1,000m), Eois development from 1st instar until pupation takes 9–10 days, with an additional 12 days until adult eclosure. In the highlands (above 1,000m), Eois development from 1st instar until pupation takes approximately 29–30 days, with 23 days until adult eclosure. A total of 1,038 parasitoid individuals were reared from Eois, representing three wasp families, Braconidae (N=883), Eulophidae (N= 12) and Ichneumonidae (N=81) as well as parasitoid flies in the family Tachinidae (N= 76). Because we did not include 1st and 2nd instars in our analyses, these results underestimate parasitism. Parasitoid wasps usually emerged from 3rd instar caterpillars, whereas tachinids most frequently emerged from pupae. Parasitoids were primarily solitary, with a single adult emerging from each caterpillar.

Across geographic regions, parasitism rates of Eois varied significantly, with the highest rates observed in Panama (43.48%), Mowed by Costa Rica (23.41%) and Ecuador (12.02%) (Figure 3) (DF = 2, χ2 = 472.05, P < 0.0001). Parasitism was significantly correlated with precipitation; higher rates were found in moist (52%) versus dry (16.8%) and wet forests (13.7%) (Figure 4) (DF = 2, χ2 = 830.3, P < 0.0001). Parasitism was also significantly higher at low (< 1000m; 35.23%) compared to higher elevations (10.5%; >1000–2500m+; DF = 1, χ2 = 539.6, P < 0.0001). The logit model revealed that precipitation was the best predictor of parasitism rate (Table 3).

Figure 1.

Host beta specialization across geographic regions calculated as the mean number of Piper species per Eois species. Chao2 is an additional measure of host specificity used to estimate the number of Piper host species expected for each species of Eois. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.

f01_01.eps

Our analysis shows that Eois are generally attacked by the same parasitoid families across geographic regions, but there were significant differences in the proportion of parasitoid families reared from Eois (Figure 5) (DF = 4, χ2 =401.9, P < 0.0001), with greater diversity occurring in Ecuador compared to Panama and Costa Rica, where parasitoids were primarily from the family Braconidae (Figure 5). Parasitoid family diversity was also significantly greater in wet versus dry forests (DF= 4, χ2= 320.1, P<0.0001) and at high versus low elevations (DF =1 χ2= 400.5, P < 0.0001). Furthermore, 64 of 76 tachinids and 74 of 81 ichneumonids were reared in the highlands, whereas 742 of 883 braconids were reared from the lowlands. Tachinids and ichneumonids were reared almost exclusively from wet forests, with the exception of 2 tachinids that were reared from a moist forest site (Panama). Braconids were reared from dry (N=58), moist (N=625) and wet forests (N=200).

Discussion

Our research is unique in that it is based on a large database documenting interactions within a single caterpillar genus, feeding on the same hostplant genus across a broad geographic range. We have demonstrated that Eois larvae exhibit high levels of hostplant specialization (Figure 2). In terms of the relative degree of host specificity within Piper, our results did not support the hypothesis that host specificity varies geographically, as each species of Eois has a narrow diet breadth, usually including just one or two Piper species (Figure 1).

Figure 2.

Diet breadth calculated as Eois species turnover with Piper species using Whitakers χas a measure of hostplant specialization (closed circles). Higher values of χindicate a greater degree of specialization. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Open circles and triangles represent diet breadth of macrolepidoptera and Eois at the level of plant family. A value of 1 represents the maximum level of host specificity.

f02_01.eps

Figure 3.

Geographic variation in percent parasitism of Eois. Ecuador (N=3440, 8 years; 2000–2007), Panama (N= 1777, 3 years; 2003–2005), Costa Rica (N= 1874, 12 years; 1995–2007). Incidence of parasitism varied significantly among geographic regions (DF = 2, χ2= 472.05, P < 0.0001) with greater parasitism of Eois in Panama.

f03_01.eps

Figure 4.

Percent parasitism of Eois across a precipitation gradient. Dry forest (N=351 ), moist forest (N= 1227) and wet forest (N=4460). Incidence of parasitism of Eois varied significantly with precipitation (DF = 2, χ2 = 830.3, P < 0.0001) with greater parasitism in the moist forest.

f04_01.eps

Table 3.

Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates

t03_01.gif

Despite the lack of variation in Eois diet breadth across our study sites, a mosaic of potential selective pressures from parasitism exists. First, we found support for our hypothesis that parasitism rates are higher at low elevations. Interestingly, parasitism rates of Eois were 3 times higher at low compared to high elevations, despite the fact that the caterpillars developed more rapidly in the lowlands (9–10 days to pupal stage versus 29–30 days at higher elevations). Our results do not provide support for the slow growth high mortality hypothesis (Clancy and Price 1987), since slow development was not associated with increased vulnerability to parasitoids. Second, Eois are exposed to striking differences in parasitism rates with seasonal variation in rainfall and their susceptibility appears to be greatest in moist tropical forests (Figure 4). Thus, we did not find support for the hypothesis that parasitism is higher in wet forests. Whether these differences are related to interactions with parasitoids and plant chemistry, variation in plant quality on caterpillar development or climatic effects on parasitoids in dry and wet forests remains to be explored. There is evidence that young leaves are eaten more rapidly in the moist forest on BCI than in the drier Brazilian Cerrado or Mexican dry forest, and both young and mature leaves are eaten more rapidly on BCI than at the high rainfall Costa Rican forest, La Selva (Leigh et al. 2004). It appears that, along a gradient of increasing precipitation, there is a peak in the consumption rate of young leaves in transitional forests with dry seasons of intermediate length (Marquis et al. 2002). Therefore, seasonality may provide an important peak in caterpillar abundance for parasitoid foraging in moist versus dry forests where parasitoids may be more vulnerable to desiccation (Shapiro and Pickering 2000). It is however currently unknown whether Eois are more abundant in moist versus dry and wet forests.

Figure 5.

Geographic variation in the proportion of parasitoid families reared from Eois. Costa Rica (Braconidae N=59, lchneumonidae N=7, Tachinidae N=10), Ecuador (Braconidae N= 141, lchneumonidae N=74, Eulophidae N=4, Tachinidae N=64) and Panama (Braconidae N=683, Eulophidae N=8, Tachinidae N=2). Parasitoid family diversity varied significantly among geographic regions (DF = 4, χ2=401.9, P < 0.0001) and was greater in Ecuador compared to Costa Rica and Panama where parasitoids were primarily from the family Braconidae.

f05_01.eps

The comparison across geographic regions revealed that parasitism rates are significantly greater in Panama compared to Costa Rica and Ecuador (Figure 3). This pattern may be due to the lower diversity of parasitoid families observed in Panama (Figure 5). Similar to our study, Rodriguez and Hawkins (2000) also found higher rates of parasitism associated with lower parasitoid diversity. In Panama, caterpillars were primarily parasitized by braconids compared to Costa Rica and Ecuador where Tachinidae and Ichneumonidae were also reared from Eois. Why tachinids and ichneumonids were virtually absent from Panama is unclear. At least for tachinids, this pattern is not due to low abundance; equal proportions of parasitoid wasps and flies were reared from macrolepidopteran larvae in the same Panamanian forests from which Eois were also collected (dry forest, 53% versus 47%; wet forest, 51% versus 49% for wasps and flies respectively) (Connahs unpublished). There are likely to be a multitude of factors that vary across these sites, minimizing inferences that can be made about parasitoid foraging and behavior without further investigation.

Although we found significant variation in parasitism of Eois, measures of host specificity did not vary greatly across this broad geographic scale. While these results may suggest that parasitoids do not influence Eois specialization, other records indicate that incidence of parasitism can vary significantly depending on the particular Piper host species (authors, unpublished data). Thus, it may be difficult to examine factors driving herbivore specialization on such a large spatial scale.

The radiation of Piper in the Neotropics appears to have been accompanied by high levels of Eois species diversity, particularly in the Andes (personal observations, all authors). Piper represents a dominant Neotropical plant genus (Gentry 1993); therefore this association may represent one of the most pervasive plant-herbivore interactions in tropical forests. We propose that the Piper-Eois system is an ideal model for addressing coevolutionary hypotheses for several reasons. First, we have demonstrated that Eois species are extremely host specific across a broad geographic scale. Second, Piper is known to contain metabolites toxic to generalist herbivores (Batista-Perieira et al. 2006, Fincher et al. 2008, Vanin et al. 2008), yet Eois appear to have overcome many of these toxins, and can completely defoliate particular species of Piper. Finally, many species of Eois are well camouflaged on Piper and exhibit specialized defensive behaviors such as régurgitation if disturbed. Regurgitation is an important defense for lepidopteran larvae (Gentry and Dyer 2002) and may contain toxic compounds repellent to parasitoids (Feltwell 1982). Preliminary data suggests that some Eois species sequester Piper compounds (Dyer et al. 2004a, Connahs unpublished), which could be used for defense. We suggest that reciprocal coevolution may be occurring between Piper and Eois, and is potentially mediated by variation in parasitoid pressure.

In order to adequately address questions regarding the relative importance of top down forces on the evolution of Eois diet breadth, more data are required on the phylogenetic relationships between Piper, Eois and their parasitoids. As Bernays and Graham (1988) pointed out, plant-insect interactions are ecologically dynamic and current associations do not represent the end-point of coevolutionary processes that have occurred over millions of years. Piper is an ancient genus Jaramillo 2006,) thus, uncovering the age of Eois' association with Piper would open up exciting opportunities for testing hypotheses on evolutionary mechanisms driving plant and insect diversity in tropical forests. The tropics are home to an extraordinary array of specialized relationships between plants and animals and as the natural history of these systems becomes better resolved, more interesting specialization stories are likely to emerge.

Acknowledgments

Funding for part of this research was provided by a Short Term Fellowship by the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama to H. Connahs. Major portions of the database were generated via funding from NSF (DEB0717173), National Geographic and Earthwatch Institute. We thank the following institutions and individuals for field work, logistics, or financial support: D. Windsor, S. Van Bael, A. Aiello, La Selva Biological Station, Yanayacu Biological Station and Center for Creative Studies, H. Greeney, A. Townsend, M. Gualinga, R. Granizo, W. Simbaña, H. Garcia, G. Vega, A. Smilanich, J. Simbaña, P. Van Zandt, W. Brackin and numerous Earthwatch volunteers. We also thank two anonymous reviewers whose comments greatly improved the manuscript.

Editor's note

Paper copies of this article will be deposited in the following libraries. Senckenberg Library, Frankfurt Germany; National Museum of Natural History, Paris, France; Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois USA; the University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA; the University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona USA; Smithsonian Institution Libraries, Washington D.C. USA; The Linnean Society, London, England.

References

1.

LG Batista-Pereira , TC Castrai , MTM da Suva , BR Amaral , JB Fernandes , PC Vieira , MFGF da Silva , AG Correa . 2006. Insecticidal activity of synthetic amides on Spodoptera. Zeitschrifi fur Naturforschung. C, A Journal of Biosciences 61(3–4): 196–202. Google Scholar

2.

B Benrey , RF Denno . 1997. The Slow-Growth High-Mortality Hypothesis: A Test Using the Cabbage Butterfly. Ecology 78(4): 987–999. Google Scholar

3.

EA Bernays , M Graham . 1988. On the evolution of host specificity in phytophagous arthropods. Ecology 69: 886–892. Google Scholar

4.

G Brehm . 2000. Diversity of geometrids in a montane rain forest in Ecuador. Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades an der Fakultät Biologie/Chemie/Geowissenschaften der Universität Bayreuth  Google Scholar

5.

G Brehm , K Fiedler . 2005. Diversity and community structure of geometrid moths of disturbed habitat in a montane area in the Ecuadorian Andes. Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 38: 1–14. Google Scholar

6.

KM Clancy , PW Price . 1987. Rapid herbivore growth enhances enemy attack: sublethal plant defenses remain a paradox. Ecology 68:3733–737. Google Scholar

7.

PD Coley , TM Aide . 1991. Comparison of herbivory and plant defenses in temperate and tropical broad-leaved forests. In: PW Price , TM Lewinsohn , GW Fernandes , WW Benson , editors. Plant-Animal Interactions Evolutionary Ecology in Tropical and Temperate Regions , pp. 25–49. John Wiley and Sons Inc. Google Scholar

8.

PD Coley , JA Barone . 1996. Herbivory and plant defenses in tropical forests. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27: 305–335. Google Scholar

9.

RK Colwell , JA Coddington . 1994. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B 345: 101–118. Google Scholar

10.

RF Denno , D Lewis , C Gratton . 2005. Spatial variation in the relative strength of top-down and bottom-up forces: causes and consequences for phytopahgous insect populations. Annales Zoologici Fennici 42: 295–311. Google Scholar

11.

LA Dyer . 1995. Tasty generalists and nasty specialists - antipredator mechanisms in tropical lepidopteran larvae. Ecology 76: 1483–1496. Google Scholar

12.

LA Dyer , PD Coley . 2002. Latitudinal gradients in tritrophic interactions. In: T Tscharntke , BA Hawkins , editors. Multitrophic level interactions , pp. 67–80. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

13.

LA Dyer , CD Dodson , JO Stireman , MA Tobler , AM Smilanich , RM Fincher , DK Letourneau . 2003. Synergistic effects of three Piper amides on generalist and specialist herbivores. Journal of Chemical Ecology 29: 2499–2514. Google Scholar

14.

LA Dyer , J Richards , CD Dodson . 2004a. Isolation, synthesis and evolutionary ecology of Piper amides. In: LA Dyer , A Palmer , editors. Piper: A model genus for studies of phytochemistry, ecology, and evolution , pp. 117–134. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, NY Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, NY Google Scholar

15.

LA Dyer , DK Letourneau , CD Dodson , MA Tobler , JO Stireman , A Hsu . 2004b. Ecological causes and consequences of variation in defensive chemistry of a Neotropical shrub. Ecology 85: 2795–2803. Google Scholar

16.

LA Dyer , A Palmer . 2004. Piper: A model genus for studies of phytochemistry, ecology, and evolution. Kluwer academic/Plenum publishers. Google Scholar

17.

LA Dyer , MS Singer , JT Lill , JO Stireman , GL Gentry , RJ Marquis , RE Ricklefs , HF Greeney , DL Wagner , HC Morais , IR Diniz , TA Kursar , PD Coley . 2007. Host specificity of Lepidoptera in tropical and temperate forests. Nature 448: 696–700. Google Scholar

18.

LA Dyer . In: WP Carson , SA Schnitzer , editors. 2007. Tropical tritrophic interactions: Nasty hosts and ubiquitous cascades. Tropical Forest Community Ecology. Blackwell Science. Google Scholar

19.

PR Ehrlich , PH Raven . 1964. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18: 586–608. Google Scholar

20.

J Feltwell . 1982. Large white butterfly. Dr W. Junk Publishers. Google Scholar

21.

RM Fincher , LA Dyer , CD Dodson , JL Richards , MA Tobler , J Searcy , JE Mather , AJ Reid , JS Rolig , W Pidcock . 2008. Inter- and Intraspecific Comparisons of Antiherbivore Defenses in Three Species of Rainforest Understory Shrubs. Journal of Chemical Ecology 34: 558–574. Google Scholar

22.

RE Forkner , MD Hunter . 2000. What goes up must come down? Nutrient addition and predation pressure on oak herbivores. Ecology 81: 1588–600. Google Scholar

23.

ID Gauld , KJ Gaston . 1994. The taste of enemy-free space: parasitoids and nasty hosts. In: BA Hawkins , W Sheehan , editors. Parasitoid community ecology , pp. 279–299. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

24.

AH Gentry . 1990. Four Neotropical Rainforests. Yale University Press. Google Scholar

25.

AH Gentry . 1993. A Field Guide to the Woody Plants of Northwest South America (Colombia, Ecuador, Peru), with Supplementary Notes on Herbaceous Taxa. Washington, DC. Conservation International 895 Google Scholar

26.

GL Gentry , LA Dyer . 2002. On the conditional nature of neotropical caterpillar defenses against their natural enemies. Ecology 83: 3108–3119. Google Scholar

27.

G Gratton , SC Welter . 1999. Does “enemy-free space” exist? Experimental host shifts of an herbivorous fly. Ecology 80(3): 773–785. Google Scholar

28.

N Greig . 2004. Introduction. In: LA Dyer , A Palmer , editors. Piper: A model genus for studies of phytochemistry, ecology, and evolution , pp. 1–4. Kluwer academic/Plenum publishers. Google Scholar

29.

S Gripenberg , T Roslin . 2005. Host plants as islands: Resource quality and spatial setting as determinants of insect distribution. Annales Apologia Fennici 42: 335–345. Google Scholar

30.

JA Harvey , MR Strand . 2002. The developmental strategies of endoparasitoid wasps vary with host feeding. Ecology 83(9): 2439–2451. Google Scholar

31.

BA Hawkins , HV Cornell , ME Hochberg . 1997. Predators, parasitoids and pathogens as mortality agents in phytophagous insect populations. Ecology 78(7): 2145–2152. Google Scholar

32.

MD Hunter , PW Price . 1992. Playing chutes and ladders: heterogeneity and the relative roles of bottom-up and top-down forces in natural communities. Ecology 73: 724–32. Google Scholar

33.

J Jaenike . 1990. Host specialization in phytophagous insects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 21: 243–273. Google Scholar

34.

MA Jaramillo . 2006. Using Piper species diversity to identify conservation priorities in the Choco region of Colombia. Biodiversity and Conservation 15: 1695–1712. Google Scholar

35.

RL Jeanne . 1979. A latitudinal gradient in rates of ant predation. Ecology 60: 1211–1224. Google Scholar

36.

EG Leigh , P Davidar , CW Dick , JP Puyravaud , J Terborgh , HT Steege , SJ Wright . 2004. Why do some topical forests have so many species of trees? Biotropica 36(4): 447–473. Google Scholar

37.

RJ Marquis , HC Morais , IR Diniz . 2002. Interactions among Cerrado plants and their herbivores: Unique or typical? In: PS OHveira , RJ Marquis , editors. The Cenados of Brazil , pp. 306–328. Columbia University Press. Google Scholar

38.

RJ Marquis . 2004. Biogeography of Neotropical Piper. In: LA Dyer , A Palmer , editors. Piper: A model genus for studies of phytochemistry, ecology, and evolution , pp. 78–94. Kluwer academic/Plenum publishers. Google Scholar

39.

DD McKenna , BD Farrell . 2006. Tropical forests are both evolutionary cradles and museums of leaf beetle diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103: 10947–10951. Google Scholar

40.

JC Miller , PE Hanson . 1989. Laboratory feeding tests on the development of gypsy moth larvae with reference to plant taxa and allelochemicals. Bulletin of the Agricultural Experimental Station, Oregon State University 674: 1–63. Google Scholar

41.

CB Mueller , P Schmid-Hempel . 1993. Exploitation of cold temperature as defense against parasitoids in bumblebees. Nature 363: 65–67. Google Scholar

42.

PW Price , CE Bouton , P Gross , BA McPheron , JN Thompson , AE Weis . 1980. Interactions among three trophic levels: influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 41–65. Google Scholar

43.

MA Quijano-Abril , R Callejas-Posada , DR Miranda-Esquivel . 2006. Areas of endemism and distribution patterns for Neotropical Piper species (Piperaceae). Journal of Biogeography 33: 1266–1278. Google Scholar

44.

MA Rodriguez , BA Hawkins . 2000. Diversity, function and stability in parasitoid communities. Ecology Letters 3 : 135–40. Google Scholar

45.

MJ Scoble . 1999. Geometrid moths of the world: A catalogue. CSIRO  Google Scholar

46.

BA Shapiro , J Picketing . 2000. Rainfall and parasitic wasp (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) activity in successional forest stages at Barro Colorado Nature Monument, Panama and La Selva Biological station Costa Rica. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 2: 39–47. Google Scholar

47.

MS Singer , JO Stireman . 2005. The tri-trophic niche concept and adaptive radiation of phytophagous insects. Ecology Letters 8: 1247–1255. Google Scholar

48.

JO Stireman , LA Dyer , DH Janzen , MS Singer , JT Lill , RJ Marquis , RE Ricklefs , GL Gentry , W Hallwachs , PD Coley , JA Barone , HF Greeney , H Connahs , P Barbosa , HC Morais , IR Diniz . 2005. Climatic unpredictability and parasitism of caterpillars: Implications of global warming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 17384–17387. Google Scholar

49.

MC Tebbs . 1989. Revision of Piper (Piperaceae) in the New World. 1. Review of characters and taxonomy of Piper section Macrostachys. Bulletin of the Natural History Museum of London 19: 117–158. Google Scholar

50.

A Termonia , JM Pasteels , DM Windsor , MC Milinkovitch . 2002. Dual chemical sequestration: a key mechanism in transitions among ecological specialization. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 269: 1–6. Google Scholar

51.

JN Thompson . 1988. Coevolution and alternative hypotheses on insect/plant interactions. Ecology 69(4): 893–895. Google Scholar

52.

SA Vanin , CS Ramos , EF Guimarães , MJ Kato . 2008. Insect feeding preferences on Piperaceae species observed in São Paulo city, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 52(1): 72–77. Google Scholar

53.

FV Vencl , F Nogueira-de-Sa' , BJ Alien , DM Windsor , DJ Futuyma . 2005. Dietary specialization influences the efficacy of larval tortoise beetle shield defenses. Oecologia 145: 404–414. Google Scholar
This is an open access paper. We use the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license that permits unrestricted use, provided that the paper is properly attributed.
Heidi Connahs, Genoveva Rodríguez-Castañeda, Toni Walters, Thomas Walla, and Lee Dyer "Geographic Variation in Host-Specificity and Parasitoid Pressure of an Herbivore (Geometridae) Associated with the Tropical Genus Piper (Piperaceae)," Journal of Insect Science 9(28), 1-11, (1 June 2009). https://doi.org/10.1673/031.009.2801
Received: 10 April 2008; Accepted: 1 June 2008; Published: 1 June 2009
JOURNAL ARTICLE
11 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top