Translator Disclaimer
1 July 2009 Pathogenicity of the Fungus, Aspergillus clavatus, Isolated from the Locust, Oedaleus senegalensis, Against Larvae of the Mosquitoes Aedes aegypti, Anopheles gambiae and Culex quinquefasciatus
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The use of insect pathogenic fungi is a promising alternative to chemical control against mosquitoes. Among the Hyphomycetes isolated from insects for mosquito control, the genus Aspergillus remains the least studied. In September 2005, four fungi were isolated from the Senegalese locust, Oedaleus senegalensis Kraus (Orthoptera: Acrididae), collected in Dakar, Senegal. One of these fungi, identified as Aspergillus clavatus, Desmazières (Eurotiales: Trichocomaceae) was highly pathogenic against larvae of the mosquitoes Aedes aegypti L., Anopheles gambiae s.l. Giles and Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae). An application of 1.2 mg/ml dry conidia yielded 100% mortality after 24 hours against both Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus while with An. gambiae it was 95%. With unidentified species in the genus Aspergillus, mortality after 24 h was <5% against all the larval species. Application of A. clavatus produced in a wheat powder medium using doses ranging between 4.3 to 21×107 spores/ml, caused 11 to 68% mortality against Cx. quinquefasciatus at 24h, and 37 to 100% against Ae. aegypti. Microscopic observations showed fungal germination on both Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae. Histological studies revealed that A. clavatus penetrated the cuticle, invaded the gut and disintegrated its cells. Some Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae, treated with A. clavatus reached the pupal stage and produced infected adults. However, the infection was mainly located on the extremity of their abdomen. These results suggest that A. clavatus could be an effective tool to manage mosquito proliferation.

Introduction

Mosquito-borne diseases currently represent a great health threat in tropical and subtropical climates. As an alternative to chemical insecticides, natural products (Koua, 1998; Batra et al., 1998; Ravindra et al., 2002), predatory fish (Legner 1995; Karch and Coz 1983; Fillinger et al. 2003) and entomopathogenic fungi (Nnakumusana 1985; Su et al. 2001; Scholte et al. 2003) are frequently used in mosquito control. Fungi such as Metarhizium anisopliae (Metchnikoff) Sorokin (Moniliales) and Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin (Clavicipitaceae), commonly found on terrestrial insects can also kill mosquito larvae (Alves et al. 2002; Silva et al. 2004a). Studies have shown that mosquito larvae are susceptible to infections by fungi such as Leptolegna chapmanii (Lord and Fukuda, 1988), M. anisopliae (Riba et al. 1986; Lacey et al. 1988; Alves et al. 2002; Silva et al. 2004a; Wright et al. 2005), B. bassiana (Alves et al. 2002), Aspergillus parasiticus (Hati and Ghosh 1965), Aspergillus spp. (de Moraes et al. 2001), Aspergillus flavus, A. parasiticus, Penicillium falicum, vasinfectum, Fusarium vasinfectum and Trichoderma viride (Govindarajan et al. 2005). Among the various Aspergillus species known to infect mosquitoes, A. clavatus Desmazières (Eurotiales: Trichocomaceae) has not been examined as a possible biological control agent. This study assessed the pathogenicity of an A. clavatus strain against larval stages of various species of mosquitoes.

Materials and Methods

Isolation

In September 2005, locusts of the species Oedaleus senegalensis Kraus (Orthoptera: Acrididae) were collected from plants growing near the department of Animal Biology (University CHEIKH A. DIOP, Dakar- Senegal). They were killed and placed for 24 hours on soil collected from the botanical garden to allow saprophytic fungi attack. Afterward, they were placed in Petri dishes containing 20 mg of wheat flour (locally purchased and sterilized in the autoclave for about 15 min at 120°C) mixed with 15 ml of sterile distilled water. One Petri dish containing the same medium only was used as a control. They were maintained at 26°C average temperature and in the range of 80– 85% ambient RH. Four days later, 4 fungal isolates appeared in the plates containing the insects, but not on the control. These fungi were separately cultivated in Petri dishes on the same medium. Dry conidia were harvested from the surface of the medium directly by scraping and conserved in Pyrex bottles sterilized at 120°C.

Fungi were identified according to Rapper and Fennel (1965), Samson (1979) and Guarro et al. (1999). The fungus A. clavatus was easily identified by his long phototrophic conidiophores (Yaguchi et al., 1993) on microscopic examination during germination.

Preliminary fungal tests on the mosquito larvae (Bioassay 1)

In September 2005, larvae of Aedes aegypti L., Anopheles gambiae s.l. Giles and Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae) were collected from various vats containing rainwater. For each fungal isolate, 1.2 mg/ml dry conidia were applied to 25 larvae (3rd and 4th instar) in 9 × 1.5 cm Petri dishes sterilized at 120°C and containing sterile 25 ml of tap water. There were four replicates for each treatment. Four non-treated Petri dishes served as control. The more virulent A. clavatus fungus was selected for production and application.

Microscopic observations

Larvae of Ae. aegypti and An. gambiae treated with A. clavatus were fixed after dying, sectioned, mounted, and then observed under light microscopy. The larvae of Cx. quinquefasciatus treated with A. clavatus at 1.2 mg/ml were used for cuticle observations under light microscopy. Larvae treated with three drops of the aqueous spore solution (1.2 mg/ml), were incubated on wheat powder medium (for Ae. aegypti) and on wet filter paper (for Cx. quinquefasciatus) at 85% R.H. and 26°C followed by observation of fungal germination.

Fungal production

A. clavatus was grown in Petri dishes containing 20 g of wheat powder (sterilized for 15 min at 120°C) and 15 ml of sterile distilled water. After four days incubation at 26°C, the substrate and dry conidia content were mixed to obtain a powder (conidia - wheat powder mixture). The number of conidia was determined using a haemocytometer.

Application of fungus (Bioassay 2)

Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus mosquito larvae were collected from vats containing rainwater in late November 2005. An. gambiae larvae were scarce at this time and were not used for the bioassay. Six plastic bottles (10 × 10 × 7 cm), each containing 500 ml of sterile tap water and 50 larvae (L3 and L4), were used for each mosquito species. Larvae were then treated with A. clavatus conidial mixture at 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20 g/l. The corresponding concentrations were 4.3; 8.5; 13; 17 and 21 × 107 spores/ ml respectively. Culture medium (wheat powder only) at 0.02 mg/ml served as control for each treatment. Total mortality was recorded for all replicates of each treatment at 24 hours post-inoculation. The surviving larvae were reared in plastic boxes (10 × 10 × 7 cm) containing 500 ml of tap water for 7 days. The emerging adults were incubated for 24 h at 26°C and fungal germination was observed after microscopic examination.

Data analysis

Data on mortality were corrected with Abbott's formula (Abbott, 1925). Student's t-test was used to compare mortality for Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus.

Figure 1.

Larvae of Culex quinquefasciatus infected by Aspergillus clavatus via cuticle (la and l b). ×400. c = cuticle, ger sp = germinating spore, myc = mycelium, sp = spore.

f01_01.eps

Results

Four Aspergillus species were isolated from the dead locusts. Preliminary tests (Bioassay 1) with conidia suspensions of each isolate revealed that A. clavatus was highly pathogenic against larvae of Ae. aegypti, Cx. quinquefasciatus and An. gambiae. Mortality rates were 100% against both Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus, while against An. gambiae it was 95%. All rates were in comparison to the control mortality (< 5%) after 24 hours (Table 1). With the other isolates (S1, S2 and S4), also identified as species in the genus Aspergillus, infection against the larvae was less than 5%.

A. clavatus induced significant mortality against mosquito larvae (Table 2) when applied (Bioassay 2 in relative humidity ranging from 65 to 80%, and temperature ranging from 24 to 26°C;. The mortalityt varied from 10.6 to 68% for Cx. quinquefasciatus and 36.7 to 100% for Ae. aegypti. Larval mortality was significantly higher against Ae. aegypti than Cx. quinquefasciatus (P = 0.0001) (Table 2). A. clavatus infection was observed under the microscope. On dead larvae, spores were found attached to the cuticle of Cx. quinquefasciatus (Figure 1a). Germinating spores (Figure 1a) and mycelia (Figure 1b) were found growing on C quinquefasciatus larva.

Table 1.

Larval mortality 24 h after fungal test on the mosquito larvae Aedes aegypti, Anopheles gambiae and Culex quinquefasciatus (average of four replicates).

t01_01.gif

Histological studies revealed that the gastric caeca of some An. gambiae was invaded by A. clavatus spores (Figure 2a). Gut invasion by conidia and initial stages of germinating conidia were observed on Ae. aegypti larvae (Figure 2d). The fungus penetrated the cuticle of Ae. aegypti larvae. Conidial germination was also observed on Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae incubated on wet filter paper and larvae of Ae. aegypti incubated on sterile wheat flour. Fungal growth was observed on all treated and incubated larvae.

Occasionally, a low percentage of Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae treated with A. clavatus conidia were able to pupate and produce adults. Germinating conidia was observed on the tip of adult abdomen 24h after incubation.

Discussion

A. clavatus was more virulent to the mosquito larvae than the other three fungal isolates. Laboratory results showed that, A. clavatus was highly pathogenic against larvae of Ae. aegypti, An. gambiae and Cx. quinquefasciatus. However, these mosquito larvae do not have the same susceptibility to the fungus. With the same dry conidial dose, (1.2 mg/ ml), death rate was 100% against both Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae and 95% against A. gambiae larvae. Referring to larval species susceptibility, the effect of this fungus is similar to that of M. anisopliae (Moniliales) and Tolypocladium cylindrosporum (Hypocreales) against An. Stephensi, Cx. pipiens and Ae. aegypti larvae (Riba et al., 1986).

Table 2.

Percent mortality rates for Culex quinquefasciatus and Aedes aegypti larvae treated with mixture of Aspergillus clavatus (average of four replicates).

t02_01.gif

When treated with A. clavatus spores, mortality was 68 % against Cx. quinquefasciatus and 100% against Ae. aegypti for 21 × 107 spores/ml. Bisht et al. (1996) found that the fungus Leptolenia caudata (Oomycetes) yielded a LD100Of 7.103 spores/ml against An. culicifacks after 7 days. Riba et al. (1986) obtained a LD100 in the order of 107 spores/ ml with a stock of M. anisopliae against Ae. aegypti larvae within 26 hours. From our results the LD100 against Ae. aegypti was closer to that of M. anisopliae against Ae. aegypti. Observations of larvae treated with A. clavatus revealed that just after adhesion of conidia on the cuticle, some germinated. The conidial proliferation on the cuticle became more obvious after 48 hours that is similar to previous studies on insects (Brett et al. 2004). Silva et al. (2004a) showed that larvae of mosquito treated with M. anisopliae had high amounts of conidia adhering to the colloid chitin with at least 90 % germination after 24 hrs incubation.

High levels of germination occurred on A. clavatus on dead Ae. aegypti larvae incubated on medium for 48 to 72 hours. Fungal germination was also observed on Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae in contact with aqueous solution of A. clavatus spores and incubated on wet filter paper, which is in agreement with Silva et al. (2004b).

However, the cuticle does not represent the only way for fungal infection. Other possible routes of invasion for M. anisopliae have been identified in mosquitoes via the respiratory siphon or the alimentary canal (Al-Aidroos and Roberts, 1978; Lacey et al., 1988; Silva et al., 2004b). Our histological results revealed a high gastric caeca invasion by A. clavatus spores in An. gambiae larvae. In the digestive tract for Ae. aegypti larvae, it was observed germinating conidia, rupture and disintegrating cells of gut. This has also been reported in previous histological studies (Lacey et al. 1988; Lord and Fukuda 1988; Silva et al. 2004b). According to Crisan (1971) and Lacey et al. (1988), a partial digestion of fungal conidia in the gut may induce a release of toxic substances. Silva et al. (2004b) revealed that rupture and disintegration of cells in the gut on dead larva might be due to the chitinolytic enzymes or others substances produced by the spores. According to Hajek and St. Leger (1994), aggressiveness of entomopathogenic fungus is related to proteolytic, lipolytic and chitinolytic mechanisms that can act after conidial adhesion on the larval cuticle or after invasion of the gut (Crisan 1971; Lacey et al. 1988; Domnas and Warner 1991; Silva et al. 2004b). A. clavatus produces a number of secondary metabolites as tryptoquivaline and tryptoquivalone (Clardy et al. 1975; Buchi et al. 1977); cytochalasin (Demain et al. 1976; Steyn et al. 1982; Lopez-Diaz and Flannigan 1997) and patulin (Varga et al. 2003). The pathological effects noted on the larvae treated with A. clavatus in our experiments might be due to these substances.

Figure 2.

Anopheles gambiae gastric cacae (2a) and Aedes aegypti gut (2b) after infection by Aspergillus clavatus. × 400. c cg = cell of gastric caecum, d cell = disintegrating cells, g cel d= gut cell in disintegration, t m= tissue of muscle.

f02_01.eps

Light microscopy observations showed that A. clavatus conidia produce germ tubes on Cx. quinquefasciatus larval cuticle and germinate. Sweeney (1978) showed that with temperatures higher than 3O°C, spores of Culicinomyces sp. could adhere to the cuticle and invade the gut of An. amictus or that of Cx. fatigans larvae. This would explain the speed of A. clavatus germination on larvae incubated at temperatures ranging between 24 and 26°C.

Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae treated with A. clavatus could pupate and produce adults. The resulting adults were collected seven days later and incubated and displayed fungal germination on their abdominal extremities There was no fungal germination on adults that resulted from untreated larvae (control). This suggests that adult mosquitoes that result from treated larvae are likely contaminated at a pre-imaginal stage. Such an observation was also reported in previous studies on adult mosquitoes. Indeed Ae. albopictus larvae (Laird et al. 1992) and Ae. aegypti larvae in contact with fungus such as Coelomomyces could pupate and produce infected adults (Lucarotti and Shoulkamy 2000). According to Laird et al. (1992), infection of adult Ae. albopictus by the fungus Coelomomyces stegomyiae var stegomyiae could be mortal.

However, in our study, no mortality was recorded for adults reared during 7 days. Lucarotti (1992) found that, on adult mosquitoes, infection by C. stegomyiae targets mainly the ovaries, which may explain the germination of A. clavatus on the tip of the abdomen.

The laboratory results show that A. clavatus isolated from O. senegalensis, is virulent against Ae. aegypti, An. gambiae and Cx. quinquefasciatus larvae and could be developed as a biological control agent against mosquitoes. However, further studies are needed for A. clavatus strain optimization, and development of better substrates for mass production and practical use. Characterization and application of toxins on mosquito larvae are needed to better understand their rapid killing effects.

References

1.

WS Abbott . 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology 18: 265–267. Google Scholar

2.

K Al-Aidroos , DW Roberts . 1978. Mutants of Metarhizium anisopliae with increased virulence toward mosquito larvae. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 20: 211–219. Google Scholar

3.

SB Alves , LFA Alves , RB Lopes , RM Pereira , SA Vieira . 2002. Potential of some Metarhizium anisopliae isolates for control of Culex quinquefasciatus (Dipt. Culicidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 126: 504–509. Google Scholar

4.

CP Batra , PK Mittal , T Adak , VP Sharma . 1998. Efficacy of neem oilwater emulsion against mosquito immatures. Indian Journal of Malariology 35: 15–21. Google Scholar

5.

GS Bisht , C Joshi , RD Khulbe . 1996. Watermolds: Potential biological control agents of malaria vector Anopheles culkifacies. Current Science 70: 393–395. Google Scholar

6.

G Buchi , KC Luk , B Kobbe , JM Townsend . 1977. Four new mycotoxins from Aspergillus clavatus related to tryptoquivaline. Journal of Organic Chemistry 42: 244–246. Google Scholar

7.

J Clardy , JP Springer , G Buchi , K Matsuo , R Wrightman . 1975. Tryptoquivaline and Tryptoquivalone, Two new tremorgenic metabolites of Aspergillus clavatus. Journal of the American Chemical Society 97: 663–665. Google Scholar

8.

AV Crisan . 1971. Mechanism responsible for release of toxin by Metarhizium spores in mosquito larvae. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 17: 260–264. Google Scholar

9.

AL Demain , HA Hunt , V Malik , B Kobbe , H Hawkins , K Matsuo , GN Wogan . 1976. Improved procedure for production of cytochalasin E by Aspergillus clavatus. Applied and Environmental Mkrobiology 31: 138–140. Google Scholar

10.

AJ Domnas , SA Warner . 1991. Biochemical activities of entomophagous fungi. Critkal Reviews in Microbiology 18: 1–13. Google Scholar

11.

U Fillinger , BG Knols , N Becker . 2003. Efficacy and efficiency of new Bacillus thuringiensis var. Israelensis and Bacillus sphaericus formulations against Afrotropical anophelines in Western Kenya. Tropical Medicine And International Health 8: 37–47. Google Scholar

12.

J Guarro , J Gene , AM Stchigel . 1999. Developments in Fungal Taxonomy. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 12: 454–500. Google Scholar

13.

M Govindarajan , A Jebanesan , D Reetha . 2005. Larvicidal effect of extracellular secondary metabolites of different fungi against the mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus Say. Tropical Biomedicine 22: 1–3. Google Scholar

14.

A Hajek , RJ St Leger . 1994. Interaction between fungal pathogens and insect hosts. Annual Review of Entomology 39: 293–322. Google Scholar

15.

Hati , Ghosh . 1965. Aspergillus parasitkus infection in adult mosquitoes. Bulletin of the Calcutta School of Tropical Medicine 13: 18–19. Google Scholar

16.

S Karch , J Coz . 1983. Histopathologie de Culex pipiens Linné (Diptera, Culicidae) soumis à l'activité larvicide de Bacillus sphaericus 1593–4. Entomologie Médicale et Parasitology 21: 225–230. Google Scholar

17.

HK Koua , SH Han , MA d'Almeida . 1998. Histopathology of Anopheles gambiae s.l. Giles, 1902 (Diptera, Culicidae) subjected to the larvicidal activity of the aqueous extract of Persea americana Miller, 1768 (Lauraceae). Bulltin of the Exotic Pathology Society 91: 252–256. Google Scholar

18.

CM Lacey , LA Lacey , DR Roberts . 1988. Route of invasion and histopathology of Metarhizium anisopliae in Culex quinquefasciatus. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 52: 108–118. Google Scholar

19.

M Laird , M Mogi , T Sota . 1992. Nothernmost occurrences of the protistan pathogen, Coelomomyces stegomyiae var. Stegomyiae. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 8: 430–432. Google Scholar

20.

EF Legner . 1995. Biological control of Diptera of medical and veterinary importance. Journal of Vector Ecology 20: 59–120. Google Scholar

21.

JC Lord , T Fukuda . 1988. An ultrastructural study of the invasion of Culex quinquefasciatus larvae by Leptolegna chapmanii (Oomycetes: Saprolegnales). Mycopatholgia 104: 67–73. Google Scholar

22.

TM Lopez-Diaz , B Flannigan . 1997. Production of patulin and cytochalasin E by Aspergillus clavatus during malting of barley and wheat. International Journal of Food Microbiology 35: 129–136. Google Scholar

23.

CJ Lucarotti . 1992. Invasion of Aedes aegypti ovaries by Coelomomyces stegomyiae. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 60: 176–184. Google Scholar

24.

CJ Lucarotti , MA Shoulkamy . 2000. Coelomomyces stegomyiae infection in adult female Aedes aegypti following the first, second and third host blood meals. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 75: 292–295. Google Scholar

25.

AML de Moraes , GL Costa , MZ Camargo Barcellos , RL Oliveira , PC Oliveira . 2001. The entomopathogenic potential of Aspergillus spp. in mosquitoes vectors of tropical diseases. Journal of Bask Microbiology 41: 45–49. Google Scholar

26.

ES. Nnakumusana 1985. Laboratory infection of mosquito larvae by entomopathogenic fungi with particular reference to Aspergillus parasiticus and its effects on fecundity and longevity of mosquitoes exposed to sporal infections in larval stages. Current Science 54: 1221–1228. Google Scholar

27.

Rapper , Fennel 1965. The genus Aspergillus. Williams & Wilkins. Google Scholar

28.

J Ravindra , A Eapen , I Kar . 2002. Evaluation of repellent action of neem oil against the filarial vector, Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae). Indian Journal of Malariology 39: 13–17. Google Scholar

29.

G Riba , A Keita , GGJ Soares , P Ferron . 1986. Comparative studies of Metarhizium anisopliae and Tolypocladium cylindrosporum as pathogens of mosquito larvae. Journal of American Mosquito Control Association 2: 469–473. Google Scholar

30.

R Samson . 1979. A compilation of the aspergilli described since 1965. Studies in Mycology 18: 1–38. Google Scholar

31.

E-J Scholte , BN Njiru , RC Smallegange , W Takken , GJ Knols . 2003. Infection of malaria (Anopheles gambiae s.s.) and filariasis (Culex quinquefasciatus) vectors with the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae. Malaria Journal 2: 29 Google Scholar

32.

RO Silva , HHG Silva , C Luz . 2004a. Effect of Metarhizium anisopliae isolates originating from soil samples of the Central Brazilian Cerrado against Aedes aegypti larvae under laboratory conditions. Revista de Patologia Tropical 33: 207–216. Google Scholar

33.

RO Silva , HHG Silva , CJ Ulhoa , C Luz . 2004b. Is there a relationship between N-acetyl-d-glucosamidase activity of Metarhizium anisopliae(Metschn.) Sorokin (Hyphomycetes) isolates from peridomestic areas in Central Brasil and larvicidal effect on Aedes aegypti (L. (Diptera, Culicidae)? Journal of Applied Entomology 129: 158–164. Google Scholar

34.

PS Steyn , FR Van Heerden , CJ Rabie . 1982. Cytochalasins E and K, toxic metabolites from Aspergillus clavatus. Journal of the Chemical Society Perkin Transactions I 1982. 541–544. Google Scholar

35.

X Su , F Zou , Q Guo , J Huang , TX Chen . 2001. A report on a mosquito-killing fungus, Pythium carolinianum. Fungal Diversity 7: 129–133. Google Scholar

36.

AW Sweeney . 1978. The effects of temperature on the mosquito pathogenic fungus Culicinomyces. Australian Joural of Zoology 26: 47–53. Google Scholar

37.

J Varga , K Rigo , J Molnar , B Toth , S Szencz , J Teren , Z Kozakiewicz . 2003. Mycotoxin production and evolutionary relationships among species of Aspergillus section Clavati. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 83: 191–200. Google Scholar

38.

MS Wright , AK Raina , AR Lax . 2005. A strain of the fungus Metarhizium anisopliae for controlling subterranean termites. Journal of economic Entomology 98: 1451–1458. Google Scholar

39.

T Yaguchi , A Someya , S Miyadoh , S Udagawa . 1993. Aspergillus ingratus, a new species in Aspergillus section Clavati. Transactions of the Mycological Society of Japan 34: 305–310. Google Scholar
This is an open access paper. We use the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license that permits unrestricted use, provided that the paper is properly attributed.
Fawrou Seye, Oumar Faye, Mady Ndiaye, Ebrima Njie, and José Marie Afoutou "Pathogenicity of the Fungus, Aspergillus clavatus, Isolated from the Locust, Oedaleus senegalensis, Against Larvae of the Mosquitoes Aedes aegypti, Anopheles gambiae and Culex quinquefasciatus," Journal of Insect Science 9(53), 1-7, (1 July 2009). https://doi.org/10.1673/031.009.5301
Received: 25 December 2007; Accepted: 1 March 2008; Published: 1 July 2009
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top