Translator Disclaimer
17 February 2010 Ranging and activity patterns of the group-living ferret badger Melogale moschata in Central China
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Patterns of space use can provide valuable insights into patterns of activity and social structure of poorly known mammal species. From April 2005 to November 2006 we radiotracked a low-density population of ferret badgers (Melogale moschata) in central China. Fourteen males and 8 females were caught. Nine of these individuals (6 males and 3 females) were followed; mean (± SD) 100% minimum convex polygon (MCP100) home range was 128.3 ± 131.9 ha, with no difference between sexes. For MCP100, neither nightly movement distances nor daily activity patterns revealed significant variation due to sex or season. Core areas (50% minimum convex polygon [MCP50]) were typically located centrally within overall home ranges. Two distinct groups of animals were evident in the radiotracked subpopulation, one consisting of 7 adults and the other composed of at least the 2 remaining collared badgers with field signs of additional badgers from the periphery of our study area. Within each group, home ranges of radiocollared individuals overlapped extensively (62.1% ± 26.5% for MCP100; 59.6% ± 23.0% for MCP95; 37.1% ± 24.5% for MCP50), and up to 4 adults per group shared the same burrow (sett). We consider the implications of our data for understanding of mustelid sociospatial behavior.

Liang Zhang, Yanping Wang, Youbing Zhou, Chris Newman, Yayoi Kaneko, David W. Macdonald, Pingping Jiang, and Ping Ding "Ranging and activity patterns of the group-living ferret badger Melogale moschata in Central China," Journal of Mammalogy 91(1), 101-108, (17 February 2010). https://doi.org/10.1644/09-MAMM-A-049R.1.
Received: 6 February 2009; Accepted: 28 April 2009; Published: 17 February 2010
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top