Translator Disclaimer
1 August 2014 How much evidence is enough evidence for a new species?
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Voss et al. (this issue) took issue with our paper on a new species of Tapirus (Cozzuol et al. 2013), claiming that the evidence we presented was not “extraordinary” enough to support a new species of large mammal in the Amazon. We agree that a new large mammal species attracts more attention than a new smaller species; however, there is no real scientific reason for evidence requirements to be stricter due to animal size or popularity. We believe our evidence was sufficient to propose a new species and in this paper we counter point by point the objections raised by our colleagues. We revisit the phylogenetic analyses of molecular data, the multivariate analyses of morphometric data, the qualitative character differences, and indigenous knowledge.

© 2014 American Society of Mammalogists
Mario A. Cozzuol, Benoit de Thoisy, Hugo Fernandes-Ferreira, Flávio H. G. Rodrigues, and Fabrício R. Santos "How much evidence is enough evidence for a new species?," Journal of Mammalogy 95(4), 899-905, (1 August 2014). https://doi.org/10.1644/14-MAMM-A-182
Received: 19 May 2014; Accepted: 1 June 2014; Published: 1 August 2014
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top