Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
17 April 2021 Molecular Analysis of Targeted Insecticide Resistance Gene Mutations in Field-Caught Mosquitos of Medical Importance From Saudi Arabia
Yuan Fang, Ernest Tambo, Jing-Bo Xue, Yi Zhang, Xiao-Nong Zhou, Emad I. M. Khater
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Gene mutations on target sites can be a valuable indicator of the status of insecticide resistance. Jeddah, a global commercial and major port-of-entry city, is bearing the brunt of dengue disease burden in Saudi Arabia. In the current study, six genotypes of three codon combinations (989, 1016, and 1534) were observed on voltage-gated sodium channel (VGSC) gene in Jeddah's Aedes aegypti population, with PGF/PGC as the dominant one.Two types of introns between exon 20 and 21 on VGSC have been identified for the first time in Ae. aegypti in Saudi Arabia. Statistical and phylogenetic analyses showed that the intron type was significantly associated with the 1016 allele and may reflect the history of insecticide treatment in different continents. In addition, fixation of the L1014F allele on VGSC and G119S on acetylcholinesterase 1 gene was detected in local Culex quinquefasciatus populations, with frequencies of 95.24 and 100%, respectively.To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of resistant-associated mutations in field-caught Cx. quinquefasciatus in Saudi Arabia.The high prevalence of insecticide resistance gene mutations in local primary mosquito vector species highlights the urgent need to carry out comprehensive insecticide resistance surveillance in Saudi Arabia.

Mosquito-borne diseases, including dengue, malaria, West Nile, Japanese encephalitis, Rift Valley fever (RVF), chikungunya, Zika, and other emerging arboviruses, are prevalent and represent an enormous threat to public health worldwide. Intensive international trade and travel, influenced by global economic integration, has accelerated the spread of mosquito-borne viruses, resulting in occasional disease outbreaks even in previously endemic or disease-free areas. At least four vector-borne viruses, including dengue virus (DENV), Alkhurma haemorrhagic fever virus, RVF virus, and Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus, have been circulating in Saudi Arabia (Al-Saeed et al. 2017). The most important of them is dengue, with most of the disease burden and severity, which is mainly prevalent in the western and southwestern regions in Jeddah and Makkah of Saudi Arabia (Heilman et al. 2014, Organji et al. 2017, Mohammed et al. 2018). The third dengue-affected city in the country after Jeddah and Makkah is Jezan (Ministry of Health of Saudi Arabia 2019), the most southwestern region of Saudi Arabia on the border with Yemen, which suffered the 2000 RVF outbreak together with Jeddah (Miller et al. 2002). A total of 5,345 confirmed dengue cases were reported in 2018, with an incidence rate of 16/100,000 population. Most of the cases (92.46%, n = 4,942) were in Jeddah and 3.05% (n = 163) were in Makkah, according to the Ministry of Health of Saudi Arabia report (Ministry of Health of Saudi Arabia 2019).

Jeddah is the financial and diplomatic center of Saudi Arabia and is the main point-of-entry for the Holy City of Makkah (only 80 km SE of Jeddah) for millions of visitors of perennial religious rituals for pilgrimage (Hajj) and Umrah as well as workers and other visitors. Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus, 1762), the major mosquito vector of dengue, chikungunya, and Zika, and Culex quinquefasciatus (Say, 1823), a vector of West Nile, RVF and Japanese encephalitis, are the two dominant mosquitoes in Jeddah (Khater et al. 2013, Alikhan et al. 2014). Although there have been no reports of West Nile virus outbreaks in Jeddah, it has been reported in countries neighboring Saudi Arabia, such as Iran and Egypt (Aghaie et al. 2016, Sayedahmed 2016). Since the distribution of Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus is widespread and both are domestic and endophagic species, there is an ever-present risk of arboviral disease outbreaks. In our previous paper, DENV-2 and four strains of insect-specific flaviviruses, including 1 cell-fusing agent virus and 3 Phlebotomus-associated flaviviruses, were detected in pools of Ae. aegypti, and 10 strains of Culex flavivirus were detected in pools of Cx. quinquefasciatus from Jeddah (Fang et al. 2021).

Since no protective vaccines or effective drugs are available for the majority of mosquito-borne diseases, the major strategy for reducing the risk of transmission is the control of disease vector mosquitoes. Vector control has been relying heavily on insecticide applications to reduce larval and adult mosquito populations in their natural habitats as well as personal protection using mosquito repellents (Sayono et al. 2016). Pyrethroids (mainly deltamethrin, cypermethrin, and cyfluthrin) and the organophosphates, pirimiphos-methyl and diazinon, have been the most common insecticides used in different commercial formulations over the last 20 yr in routine mosquito control operations in Saudi Arabia. Aedes aegypti populations from Jeddah and Makkah showed high resistance to permethrin, deltamethrin, and bendiocarb and were tolerant to fenitrothion, based on conventional insecticide bioassays performed on adult mosquito samples collected in 2015 (Al-Nazawi et al. 2017). Noteworthy, in a 10-yr period, the mortalities to pyrethroids decreased from 75 to 93% in 2008 to <20% in 2017 in the Ae. aegypti population in Makkah (Al-Nazawi et al. 2017). In addition, the Ae. aegypti population in Jezan was only sensitive to cyfluthrin, tolerant to deltamethrin, permethrin, and fenitrothion, and resistant to Lambda-cyhalothrin, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), and bendiocarb (Alsheikh et al. 2016). However, to our knowledge, no relevant record exists on insecticide resistance in field-caught Cx. quinquefasciatus from Saudi Arabia.

Selection pressure on insecticide target sites of mosquito vectors, resulting in the occurrence and development of single- or multiple-site mutations in the responsible genes, has been reported and subsequently detected globally in major mosquito vector species belonging to the genera Anopheles, Aedes, and Culex in the last few decades (Sokhna et al. 2013, Scott et al. 2015, Moyes et al. 2017). Increased insecticide target-site insensitivity due to gene point mutations and the increased or elevated activity of insecticide-detoxifying enzymes are two of the major mechanisms that have evolved in mosquito vectors for surviving the lethal effect of insecticides (Brengues et al. 2003, Liu 2015). The voltage-gated sodium channel (VGSC) gene is the major target site for pyrethroids and DDT (Hemingway and Ranson 2000), which comprises four homologous domains (DI to DIV), and each domain contains six transmembrane helical segments (S1–6) (de Lera Ruiz and Kraus 2015). The most prevalent insecticide resistance gene mutation is the knockdown resistance (kdr), which is linked to single nucleotide polymorphisms on the transmembrane segment 6 of domain II of the VGSC (Soderlund and Knipple 2003). The mutation sites on the amino acid 1014 position on VGSC IIS for both Anopheles and Culex, and the 1016 position for Aedes, were well confirmed to reduce mosquito sensitivity to pyrethroid, and the organochlorine DDT due to cross-resistance effect (Donnelly et al. 2009; Du et al. 2013, 2016). In particular, several point mutation sites on VGSC are speculated to be involved in pyrethroid and DDT resistance in Ae. aegypti, including G923V, L982W, S989P, M1011I/G, V1016G, and F1269C in domain II and T1520I, F1552C, F1534C, and D1763Y in domain III of VGSC (Chang et al. 2009, Yanola et al. 2010, Kushwah et al. 2015, Sayono et al. 2016). Among them, two point mutations, V1016G and F1534C, that confer resistance to pyrethroids and DDT, are the most widespread (Harris et al. 2010, Dusfour et al. 2015, Li et al. 2015, Du et al. 2016, Kawada et al. 2016). Four non-synonymous (A99S, L1014F/S/C, V1016G, and W1594R) and six synonymous, (L884L, G923G, A1262A, D1266D, P1270P, and G1754G) mutations were found to be linked with the levels of permethrin resistance in Cx. quinquefasciatus populations (Komagata et al. 2008, Li et al. 2012, Xu et al. 2012). In addition, the replacement of the amino glycine (Gly, G) with serine (Ser, S) on position 119 of acetylcholinesterase 1 (ace-1) was found to be associated with resistance to organophosphate and carbamate insecticide groups (Weill et al. 2003). The G119S mutation was commonly detected in Anopheles (Essandoh et al. 2013, Fang et al. 2019) and Culex (Bourguet et al. 1998), while seldomly recorded in Aedes species (Sayono et al. 2016).

In Saudi Arabia, S989P, V1016G, and F1534C mutations on VGSC were reported in Ae. aegypti samples collected from Jeddah and Makkah in 2015 (Al-Nazawi et al. 2017). Al-Nazawi et al. (2017) was the first to report insecticide resistance gene mutations in Ae. aegypti populations from Saudi Arabia. However, point mutations in the VGSC of Ae. aegypti populations in Jeddah have not been fully characterized, especially the types of introns between exons 20 and 21, as well as whether the ace-1 mutations were in Jeddah Ae. aegypti populations. In Cx. quinquefasciatus, the V1016G mutation was detected in the JPP-B strain, originating from Jeddah and selected by permethrin for 20 consecutive generations (Amin 1989, Komagata et al. 2008). This mutation has not been reported in other populations of the Cx. pipiens complex (Scott et al. 2015). To the best of our knowledge, since the first studies performed in the mid-1980s, no study on insecticide resistance gene(s) in Cx. quinquefasciatus populations has been reported so far in Saudi Arabia. Thus, currently, there is limited information on insecticide resistance gene mutations in Cx. quinquefasciatus against chemical insecticides in Jeddah. Bioassay tests are designed to detect insecticide resistance in vector populations collected from the field or those reared from field larval collections (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] 2012). Such tests require large number of live and homogenous population of mosquitoes and are time-consuming compared with molecular methods (Chung et al. 2019). Early detection and characterization of target mutations of insecticide resistance genes, as potentially valuable molecular markers, can provide a reference to estimate the local insecticide resistance level (Saavedra-Rodriguez et al. 2007, Wuliandari et al. 2015, Sayono et al. 2016).

This study aimed to determine the status of insecticide resistance attributed to kdr mutations and the phylogeny of the introns between the exons 20 and 21 on VGSC, and ace-1, in Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus. The results of our study will be important for the early detection of developing resistance and in guiding integrated vector management and insecticide application policies for the prevention and control of mosquito-borne diseases in Saudi Arabia.

Materials and Methods

Mosquito Collection

Mosquitoes were collected with Black Hole strap (BioTrap Co., Ltd, Seoul, South Korea) during routine mosquito surveillance in 2016. More details about the collection method and the results of mosquito diversity and seasonal density are were reported by in Fang et al. (2021). A total of 25 Ae. aegypti and 24 Cx. quinquefasciatus female mosquitoes were analyzed, representing different districts and municipalities of Jeddah Governorate. Collection sites for the detection of target-site mutations on insecticide resistance genes are shown in Fig. 1, and a map was generated using ArcGIS 10.1 ArcMap software (ESRI, Redlands, CA). The species name, geographic information (including the latitude and longitude information), and GenBank accession numbers of each randomly selected samples are shown in  Supp Table S1 (online only).

DNA Extraction and Target-Gene Mutation Sequencing

For DNA extraction, individual mosquitoes were homogenized using two 3-mm steel balls in a mixer mill (Jingxin, Shanghai, China) in 250 µl of ATL (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and 20 µl of proteinase K (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The homogenates were incubated at 56°C overnight in an oscillating thermo-block. They were then centrifuged at 1,000 rpm for 3 min at room temperature. 200 µl supernatant from each homogenate was added to the Roche MagNA Pure 96 sample plate, and placed into to the MagNA Pure 96 System for automated DNA extraction (MagNA Pure 96 DNA and Viral NA Small Volume Kit, Roche, Basel, Switzerland) according to the manufacturer's instructions DNA was eluted in 100 µl of buffer solution.

Fig. 1.

Map of mosquito collection sites for detection of target-site mutations on insecticide resistance genes in 2016 in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Squares represent collection sites of Aedes aegypti, triangles represent sites of Culex quinquefasciatus.

img-z3-7_1839.jpg

For Ae. aegypti, the primer set IIS5-6(3)F and IIS5-6(3)R (Al-Nazawi et al. 2017) were used to amplify the IIS6 domain of the VGSC, spanning the codons 989, 1011, and 1016 and the introns between exons 20 and 21, while the codon 1534 domain IIIS6 was amplified by the primer set AaNa31F and AaNa31R (Harris et al. 2010). The ace-1 gene region spanning the position 119 was amplified by the primer set Ace-1F and Ace-1R (Hasmiwati et al. 2018). For Cx. quinquefasciatus, the VGSC region spanning the 1014 codon was amplified by the primer set Cq1 and Cq2 (Sarkar et al. 2009). The fragment containing the ace-1 mutation was amplified by the primer set Moustdir and Moustrev (Huchard et al. 2006).

The PCR amplification products were separated on 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis, purified, and sequenced in both directions by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). The peak spectrum (chromatogram) of the sequencing data was determined using BioEdit v.7.2.6 (Hall 1999). The allelic information for certain ambiguous sequences, cloning into pESI-T vector (Yeasen Biotech Inc., China), and nucleotide sequencing were performed for confirmation.

Phylogenetic Analysis

The obtained VGSC IIS6 fragments spanning the introns flanked by exons 20 and 21 were aligned with –136 homologous sequences retrieved from GenBank using ClustalW2 (Larkin et al. 2007) with default settings, which were manually adjusted when was necessary. Based on the Akaike information criterion, the best-fit model for the alignment was determined using Model test 3.7 (Posada and Crandall 1998), in cooperation with PAUP* v.4.0b10 (Wilgenbusch and Swofford 2003). Consequently, maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian likelihood trees were constructed using the TVM+ G model for introns between exons 20 and 21 on the VGSC. Both the ML and neighbour-joining trees were constructed using MEGA v.7.0 (Kumar et al. 2016), with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. The Bayesian tree was built with MrBayes v3.2.6 (Ronquist et al. 2012) on the CIPRES portal ( www.phylo.org/) (Miller et al. 2010), run for 10 million generations, with the first 25% generations discarded as burn-in. The trees were visualized using Figtree v1.4.2 ( http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/). Both intra- and inter-specific divergences of introns spanning between exons 20 and 21 were calculated using the K2P distance model (Kimura 1980) in MEGA v.7.0 .

Statistical Analysis

Pearson's chi-squared test was applied to analyze associations among mutation codons and type of introns between exons 20 and 21 on VGSC. The tests were performed in SPSS v.20 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).

Results

Mapping of the Target-Site Resistance–Associated Genes in Ae. aegypti

The target-site resistance–associated genes were successfully amplified from a total of 20 Ae. aegypti and 21 Cx. quinquefasciatus. The sequences originally obtained in this study were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers MN997310–MN997399. Three non-synonymous VGSC mutation alleles, S989P, V1016G, and F1534C, were identified from specimens of wild Ae. aegypti. The presence of a silent mutation (TTG to TTA) at position (Leu, L) 982 (14/20) was found. No I1011M or F1552C mutations were identified. In addition, two types of introns between exons 20 and 21, type A (250 bp) and type B (234 bp), were identified.

Six genotypes of the combination of the 989, 1016, and 1534 positions were documented including SVF/PGF, SVF/SVC, SVC/SVC, PGF/PGF, PGF/PGC, and PGC/PGC (Table 1). Among them, PGF/PGC was the dominant genotype, detected in 45% of the examined samples, followed by the SVC/SVC genotype with 25%. Genotypes of SVF/PGF, SVF/SVC, and PGC/PGC were observed less frequently. Allele frequencies are shown in Table 2. The V1016G mutation seems to be more widely distributed at high frequency (67.50%) in Jeddah, than the F1534C mutation (55.00%). Both TTG982TTA (χ2 = 22.000, df = 2, P < 0.001) and S989P (χ2 = 44.000, df = 4, P < 0.001) co-occur in the presence of V1016G. All TTG982TTA and S989P coexist with the haplotype harboring the V1016G mutation. In individuals carrying the homozygous F1534C mutation in the IIIS6 region, no other coexisting mutations were observed on 982, 989, and 1016 codons in the IIS6 domain.

The type A intron between exons 20 and 21 was strongly linked to the V1016G mutation (Table 3). The haplotype with the type A intron was in association with V1016G mutation (χ2 = 22.00, df = 2, P < 0.001) and wild-type F1534 (χ2 = 11.75, df = 2, P = 0.003). By contrast, the F1534C mutation was strongly linked to the type B intron with all of the SVC/SVC genotype linked to the type B intron too. The allele type on 1016 position was highly correlated with the other two mutations, 989 and 1534, especially the 989 position (χ2 = 44.00, df = 4, P < 0.001). All homozygous V1016G mutations are linked to homozygous S989P mutation, and V1016G heterozygous mutation is linked to heterozygous S989P mutation, whereas the wild-type of V1016 is linked to the S989. Individuals possessing homozygous wild-type V1016 harbored homozygous (5/6) or heterozygous (1/6) of the F1534C mutation; however, no wild-type homozygous F1534 was observed coexist.

Table 1.

Frequency (percentage) of triple-locus kdr genotypes, shown as amino acid codon number 989, 1016, and 1534 in the VSGC gene of Aedes aegypti collected from Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

img-z4-5_1839.gif

Table 2.

Frequency (percentage) of point mutations (S989P, V1016G, F1534C) and intron types identified in the VSGC gene of Aedes aegypti collected from Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

img-z4-14_1839.gif

Phylogenetic Analysis of Intron Types Identified in the VSGC Gene of Ae. aegypti

The intron located between exons 20 and 21 on VGSC identified in our study and those retrieved from GenBank were compared and used to calculate the evolution of the kdr mutations. The 158 studied sequences can be clearly divided into two clades with high bootstrap values, one clade contained the sequences possessing type A intron, while the second clade contained those sequences with type B intron (Fig. 2). The intra-group genetic distances of type A and type B introns were 0.001 and 0.049, respectively, whereas the inter-group was 0.355. The two intron types were detected in four continents, Africa, Asia, and South and North America, suggesting that they were distributed paraphyletically. In South America (Brazil, El-Salvador, Guatemala) and North America (California and Hawaii), the ratio of type A to type B intron was 5:1 and 4:0, respectively; while in Asia (China, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Viet Nam), the ratio was 88:37, and in Africa (Ghana, Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria, Zambia, Zimbabwe), the ratio was 4:17. In addition, for global analysis of the associations among mutation codons and the types of introns between exons 20 and 21 on VGSC, we added the specific 989, 1016, and 1534 allele types of those sequences, available from GenBank. The results of the analysis of the associations between the three codons and the intron types reported, showed that the allele type of the 1016 position was more related to the 989 position (χ2 = 49.910, df = 4, P < 0.001) than to the 1534 position (χ2 = 16.297, df = 4, P = 0.003). While the intron polymorphism was more correlated to the 1016 position (χ2 = 34.333, df = 2, P < 0.001) than the 1534 position (χ2 = 18.005, df = 2, P < 0.001) (Table 3).

Point Mutations and Polymorphisms on VGSC and ace-1 in Cx. quinquefasciatus

The majority of the successfully sequenced partial VGSC gene with the kdr mutation in Cx. quinquefasciatus was the homozygous genotype TTT/TTT (90.48%), except for two of them, which were the heterozygous genotype TTT/TTA.

All the detected ace-1 at 119 location was the heterozygous genotype GGC/AGC.

Discussion

The application of indoor residual spraying (IRS) and larvicides to reduce and control the population abundance of Aedes, Culex, and Anopheles mosquitoes witnessed a significant decline in the 1970s and 1980s. The persistent mosquito-borne disease foci and endemicity are in the major Saudi cities of Jeddah, Makkah, Madinah, Aseer, and Jezan, and in the southwestern and southern border regions, renewed government efforts have ushered in enhanced pest surveillance coupled with integrated vector control programs, which have shown a significant decline in the total national cases (e.g., dengue) from 2000 till 2019 (Ministry of Health of Saudi Arabia 2020). However, as a side-effect, insecticide resistance have developed in local populations.

Table 3.

Chi-squared analysis of the linkage between point mutations and type A and B introns located between exons 20 and 21 on VGSC reported in Aedes aegypti from Jeddah, Saudi Arabia and homologous sequences retrieved from the GenBank from other geographic regions

img-z5-2_1839.gif

In the current study, three non-synonymous point mutations on 989, 1016, and 1534 positions and type A and B introns on VGSC were detected in field-caught Ae. aegypti mosquito samples in 2016 from Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. No samples that harboured the wild type at the three mutation loci simultaneously were identified. The I1011M/V mutation was absent in Jeddah, even though this substitution of isoleucine on position 1011 is prevalent in South America (Saavedra-Rodriguez et al. 2007, Martins et al. 2009a, b; Siller et al. 2011), and has spread in Thailand and Vietnam at low frequencies (Rajatileka et al. 2008, Bingham et al. 2011).

So far, to our knowledge, Saudi Arabia has the most variation in kdr mutations that may be due to long-term usage of pyrethroids in vector control programs in major cities, especially in Jeddah since the first dengue epidemic in 1994. The kdr polymorphisms of Ae. aegypti populations in Jeddah are different from those reported in other Middle Eastern countries. High prevalence of the F1534C mutation, and low frequencies of I1011M/V and V1016I mutations, with the absence of the 989P allele, were observed in India (Kushwah et al. 2015). In Pakistan, all the studied mosquito samples harboured the homozygous F1534C mutation, whereas no mutation at the 1016 position has been identified (Stenhouse et al. 2013).

The percentage of homozygous V1016G and S989P mutation co-occurrence was high (65.0%) in Jeddah. The V1016G mutation plays a critical role in kdr resistance against pyrethroid compounds (Du et al. 2013, 2016; Stenhouse et al. 2013). Linkage association has been observed between the 989 and 1016 loci in Ae. aegypti populations of Saudi Arabia (Al-Nazawi et al. 2017), Myanmar (Kawada et al. 2014), and Thailand (Srisawat et al. 2010).

It has been speculated that the S989P may serve as a compensatory mutation to the V1016G, to reduce the fitness cost to the mosquito (Du et al. 2016) and strengthen the response of V1016G to permethrin and deltamethrin (Hirata et al. 2014). Additionally, double homozygous mutations at positions 989 and 1016 combined with either wild-type or heterozygous mutations at the 1534 position were common in Jeddah's population, in agreement with the speculation that the 1016 and 1534 loci were not independent in a linkage disequilibrium analysis (Vera-Maloof et al. 2015). Further, the genotype with the triple mutation haplotype predominated in the tested mosquito samples at 45% (PGC/PGF). Additionally, one individual possessing triple homozygous mutation on 989, 1016, and 1534 loci was found in this study. In field-collected mosquitoes, the triple homozygous mutation was observed at low frequency in the population (Yanola et al. 2011, Stenhouse et al. 2013, Kawada et al. 2014, Dusfour et al. 2015, Marcombe et al. 2019), probably due to the fitness cost exerted on the mosquito by this triple mutation (Brito et al. 2013, Hirata et al. 2014). However, the artificially introduced triple mutation, using the Xenopus oocyte expression systems, appeared to confer a higher level of resistance to both permethrin and deltamethrin than those carrying the individual mutations, probably due to the synergistic effect of the combination of mutant alleles (Du et al. 2013, 2016; Hirata et al. 2014). Li et al. (2015) suggested that the F1534C mutation could possibly serve as a compensatory mutation for reducing the fitness cost to the mosquito induced by the V1016G mutation. Thus, whether the homozygous triple mutations on 989, 1016, and 1534 loci lead to insecticide resistance in field mosquitoes is yet to be ascertained.

The intron polymorphism of VGSC could serve as a marker to study the evolution of kdr mutations (Martins et al. 2009b, Chung et al. 2019). Based on sequence size, the introns located between exons 20 and 21 were classified into type A (250 pb) and type B (234 pb) (Martins et al. 2009b). Analysis of intron sequences obtained in our study and homologous sequences retrieved from GenBank showed that the intron type was significantly associated with 1016 (χ2 = 34.333, df = 2, P = 0.000) and 1534 (χ2 = 18.005, df = 2, P = 0.000) allele type. Further, all individuals possessing the V1016G mutation, either heterozygous or homozygous, harboured the type A intron, but not vice versa. This result was in contrast to the suggestion of Saavedra-Rodriguez et al.'s (2007) that the V1016G mutation was distributed independently in haplotypes possessing either the type A or type B intron. Additionally, the global data analysis showed that the two intron types were distributed evenly in both heterozygous and homozygous F1534C mutations, but the homozygous wild-type F1534 was mainly associated with the type A intron, and not vice versa as well. In Jeddah, six of the examined mosquito individuals were harbouring the homozygous F1534C mutation. Among them, five individuals with the SVC/SVC genotype possessed the type B intron, while the individual carrying the homozygous triple mutation (PGC/PGC) was coupled with the type A intron. In Taiwan Province, China, the F1534C was found to be strictly associated with the type B intron, and the V1016G mutation coexisted with the type A intron (Chung et al. 2019). By contrast, in Africa, the point mutation at the 1534 site was found to be strongly linked with the type A intron in Ghana, but only one heterozygote point mutation V1016I was recorded, except for the F1534C mutations (Kawada et al. 2016). Additionally, V1016I was reported to be located at the haplotype possessing the type A intron, with no 1534 variation observed in Brazil (Martins et al. 2009b, 2013). The mutation at position 1016 was associated with resistance to both type I and II pyrethroids, while the F1534C allele was primarily associated with resistance to type I pyrethroids, and the V1016I mutation did not alter channel sensitivity to pyrethroids in Xenopus oocytes (Du et al. 2013, 2016). Based on the evidence above, we speculate that kdr mutations are inclined to coexist with the type A intron. When a mutation occurred in either 1016 or 1534 positions, it would be linked to the type A intron. While in case of co-mutation, the type A intron was distributed more frequently with the V1016G/I mutation rather than the F1534C mutation. This is probably due to balancing the fitness cost to the mosquito by increasing the compensatory advantage or linkage disequilibrium (Lynch 2002, Hirata et al. 2014).

Fig. 2.

Maximum likelihood phylogeny of introns between exons 20 and 21 of the voltage-gated sodium channel (VGSC) gene of Aedes aegypti, constructed by 158 sequences under theTVM+ G model.The GenBank accession number, collection country/province, and year of each sequence are noted.The sequences obtained from Saudi Arabia are in italics (red color in online version).The numbers above the branch represent the bootstrap support of the maximum likelihood, neighbour-joining, and Bayesian analyses, respectively, based on 1,000 replicates.The scale bar indicates 0.01 nucleotide substitutions per site. Dark gray and light gray indicate the type A and B of the introns located between exons 20 and 21.

img-z6-1_1839.jpg

It has been speculated that the type B intron is the ancestor of introns between exons 20 and 21, because Ae. aegypti was originally from Africa and the majority of African individuals belong to type B (Gloria-Soria et al. 2016, Kawada et al. 2016). In view of the phylogenetic tree obtained with available global data of the intron sequences, 100, 83.33, and 70.40% individuals from North American, South American, and Asian countries, respectively, were of type A intron. By contrast, 73.91% of sequences from Africa belonged to the type B intron. According to our analyses above, type A introns commonly coexist with kdr mutations, especially the V1016G mutation; while the type B couples with the wild-type or F1534C mutation when the V1016G mutation is absent. This variable pattern of association may reflect the history of insecticide treatment in different continents. The major disease burden of malaria is in Africa and South-East Asia (World Health Organization [WHO] 2019). The mutation on 1534 locus may have arisen in Aedes species due to the use of DDT for larviciding and IRS to control malaria since the middle of the last century (Balkew et al. 2010, Harris et al. 2010). Whereas in some South and North American countries, vector control is mainly focused on Aedes species (mainly Ae. aegypti and Aedes albopictus) that are vectors of dengue, chikungunya, yellow fever, and Zika (Weaver et al. 2018). In domestic and endophagic habitats for Ae. aegypti, pyrethroid-based insecticides are widely used in household aerosols for public and personal protection, since pyrethroids are highly efficacious against mosquito vectors, and have low mammalian toxicity and a short residual action (WHO 2013). In South Asian countries, the higher frequency of type A intron than that of type B may indicate different selective pressures resulting in different histories of intense and unrestricted insecticide usage. It is likely that the F1534C mutations occurred due to the extensive use of DDT or type I pyrethroids, as both insecticides have the same target site (Harris et al. 2010). Then V1016G has been selected by the subsequent and wide use of type II pyrethroids, such as cypermethrin and deltamethrin (Kawada et al. 2014).

Both the non-synonymous mutation G119S (GGC/AGC) and silent mutation T506T on ace-1 (Hasmiwati et al. 2018) were not detected in Ae. aegypti samples from Jeddah. However, this does not indicate that the Ae. aegypti population was completely susceptible to organophosphate and carbamate compounds, as both types of insecticides have the same target site. In bioassay tests, the Ae. aegypti population from Jeddah was tolerant to fenitrothion (Al-Nazawi et al. 2017), indicating that other than kdr mutations, or more likely, enzymatic mechanisms are involved in conferring resistance in mosquitoes. In Central Java, Indonesia, although the G119S mutation was absent, a degree of resistance to malathion was observed in Ae. aegypti (Sayono et al. 2016).

Reports on target-site mutations on VGSC and ace-1 of Cx. quinquefasciatus are rare compared to those on Ae. aegypti. However, the insecticide resistance level in Cx. quinquefasciatus in Jeddah may be even worse as inferred from the fixation of the mutation allele both on VGSC and ace-1. In the studied mosquito samples in Jeddah, the kdr homozygous genotype TTT/TTT occupied 90.48% of the individuals. However, the heterozygous genotype GGC/AGC on ace-1 was detected in all samples of Cx. quinquefasciatus. This is probably related to constant exposure due the extensive use of insecticides for routine spraying campaigns of public health, or for domestic use against mosquito vectors and other insect pests in Jeddah region. Similarly, the homozygous susceptible 1014 genotype was absent in samples collected in 2011 from Zanzibar, East Africa (Jones et al. 2012). In India, most of the studied mosquito samples harboured the heterozygous genotype TTT/TTA, at a frequency of 75% in Cx. quinquefasciatus samples (Sarkar et al. 2009).

One major limitation of our study was the small sample size of mosquitoes used for detection of target-site mutations in insecticide resistance genes. However, the primary survey revealed widespread kdr in the predominant mosquitoes in Jeddah. Further, bioassay tests on both larvae and adult mosquitoes are required to evaluate the status of insecticide resistance, and the association of kdr mutations and insecticide resistance in practice, and the underlying metabolic mechanism responsible for insecticide resistance is worth exploring.

Conclusions

The current study involved a wider geographic region of Ae. aegypti vector populations in Jeddah. The results showed that six genotypes of the three codon combinations, 989, 1016, and 1534, were spreading in Jeddah's Ae. aegypti population, with the PGF/PGC as the dominant one. Two types of introns between exons 20 and 21 were identified in Saudi Arabia for the first time. Linkage associations have been shown between V1016G with S989P, V1016G with F1534, and V1016G with type A introns. High prevalence of kdr mutations implies that the local Ae. aegypti mosquitoes are pyrethroid-resistant, and the level of resistance may increase with the extensive and intensive use of pyrethroid, as the active ingredients in household insecticide and spatial repellents. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of resistant-associated mutations in field-caught Cx. quinquefasciatus in Saudi Arabia. The fixation of L1014F allele on VGSC and G119S on ace-1 was detected in local Cx. quinquefasciatus populations, at the frequencies of 95.24% and 100%, respectively, demonstrating that traditional insecticides are likely to be losing efficacy through fogging activities or IRS. In addition, analysis of intron sequences obtained in our study and homologous sequences retrieved from GenBank showed that the intron type was significantly associated with 1016 (P = 0.000) allele type in Ae. aegypti and may reflect the history of insecticide treatment in different continents.

The primary analyses showed the widespread distribution of kdr mutation both in Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus. The situation may become even be worse with increasing urbanization, climate change, and sustained AedesCulex endemicity estimated at a 31–56% prevalence rate, thus threatening the efficiency of vector control against mosquito-borne diseases. It raises the attention that continuous wide range of surveillance of the polymorphism and distribution of insecticide target-site mutations in mosquitoes in this region is highly needed. The mapping of the nation-wide distribution and polymorphism of target-site mutation against insecticide resistance will provide valuable consensus for forecasting the status of insecticide resistance development in mosquito populations of Jeddah and other regions of Saudi Arabia. Additionally, regular monitoring and documenting of the dynamics of target mutation genes and their associations with the insecticide resistance phenotypes is important in the surveillance system for preventing mosquito-borne diseases through long-term and sustainable vector control strategies.

Meanwhile, the above findings suggest that alternative insecticides in areas and the proper use of insect growth regulators or biocontrol approaches for integrated vector control programs should be considered in Jeddah and neighborhoods to mitigate and slow down the spread and impact of insecticide resistance development in disease vector populations. The Saudi government and Jeddah municipality commitment and investment in innovative operational research and development on early detection methods for insecticide resistance, and effective control measures, including vaccines for local and pilgrims' immunization programs. With the establishment of the Public Health Pest Laboratory of Jeddah Governorate, sustainable funding is imperative to provide evidence for coherent and coordinated temporal and spatial epidemiological integrated vector management and pesticide implementation among all stakeholders. Furthermore, strengthening laboratory and epidemiological capacity building programs for health workers, health professionals, and community engagement including private–public sectors partnerships is important for furthering our ability to control mosquito vectors of dengue, and other emerging threats and epidemics of mosquito-borne diseases.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary data are available at Journal of Medical Entomology online.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to the Public Health Pests Laboratory (PHPL) staff and administrators, Department of Environmental Health, Municipality of Jeddah Governorate, Ministry of Health and Municipalities for their support for mosquito sample provision and taxonomic identification, and the Golden Eyes Establishment, Jeddah, for the operationalization of this PHPL project. This research was funded by the Special Foundation of Basic Science and Technology Resources Survey of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China, 2017FY101203 and the Project of Basic Platform of National Science and Technology Resources of the Ministry of Sciences and Technology of China, TDRC-2019-194-30. The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results. Conceptualization: TE, YF, EK, and YZ; investigation: YF, EK, and TE; data curation: TE, EK, YF, and JX; writing—original draft preparation: YF and TE; writing—review and editing: YF, TE, EK, and YZ; funding acquisition: YZ, TE, EK, and XZ. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

References Cited

1.

Aghaie, A., J. Aaskov, S. Chinikar, M. Niedrig, S. Banazadeh, and H. K. Mohammadpour. 2016. Frequency of West Nile virus infection in Iranian blood donors. Indian J. Hematol. Blood Transfus. 32: 343–346. Google Scholar

2.

Al-Nazawi, A. M., J. Aqili, M. Alzahrani, P. J. McCall, and D. Weetman. 2017. Combined target site (kdr) mutations play a primary role in highly pyrethroid resistant phenotypes of Aedes aegypti from Saudi Arabia. Parasit. Vectors 10: 161. Google Scholar

3.

Al-Saeed, M. S., S. A. El-Kafrawy, S. A. Farraj, T. L. Al-Subhi, N. A. Othman, A. Alsultan, H. G. Ben Helaby, M. M. Alshawdari, A. M. Hassan, R. N. Charrel, et al. 2017. Phylogenetic characterization of circulating dengue and Alkhurma hemorrhagic fever viruses in Western Saudi Arabia and lack of evidence of Zika virus in the region: a retrospective study, 2010–2015. J. Med. Virol. 89: 1339–1346. Google Scholar

4.

Alikhan, M., K. Al Ghamdi, and J. A. Mahyoub. 2014. Aedes mosquito species in western Saudi Arabia. J. Insect Sci. 14: 69. Google Scholar

5.

Alsheikh, A. A., W. S. Mohammed, E. M. Noureldin, O. M. Daffalla, K. J. Shrwani, Y. A. Hobani, F. A. Alsheikh, M. H. Alzahrani, and A. A. Binsaeed. 2016. Resistance status of Aedes aegypti to insecticides in the Jazan region of Saudi Arabia. Biosci. Biotech. Res. Asia 13: 155–162. Google Scholar

6.

Amin, A. M. 1989. Preliminary investigation of the mechanisms of DDT and pyrethroid resistance in Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae) from Saudi Arabia. Bull. Ent. Res. 79: 361–366. Google Scholar

7.

Balkew, M., M. Ibrahim, L. L. Koekemoer, B. D. Brooke, H. Engers, A. Aseffa, T. Gebre-Michael, and I. Elhassen. 2010. Insecticide resistance in Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae) from villages in central, northern and south west Ethiopia and detection of kdr mutation. Parasit. Vectors 3: 40. Google Scholar

8.

Bingham, G., C. Strode, L. Tran, P. T. Khoa, and H. P. Jamet. 2011. Can piperonyl butoxide enhance the efficacy of pyrethroids against pyrethroid-resistant Aedes aegypti? Trop. Med. Int. Health 16: 492–500. Google Scholar

9.

Bourguet, D., D. Fonseca, G. Vourch, M. P. Dubois, F. Chandre, C. Severini, and M. Raymond. 1998. The acetylcholinesterase gene Ace: a diagnostic marker for the pipiens and quinquefasciatus forms of the Culex pipiens complex. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 14: 390–396. Google Scholar

10.

Brengues, C., N. J. Hawkes, F. Chandre, L. McCarroll, S. Duchon, P. Guillet, S. Manguin, J. C. Morgan, and J. Hemingway. 2003. Pyrethroid and DDT cross-resistance in Aedes aegypti is correlated with novel mutations in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene. Med. Vet. Entomol. 17: 87–94. Google Scholar

11.

Brito, L. P., J. G. Linss, T. N. Lima-Camara, T. A. Belinato, A. A. Peixoto, J. B. Lima, D. Valle, and A. J. Martins. 2013. Assessing the effects of Aedes aegypti kdr mutations on pyrethroid resistance and its fitness cost. PLoS ONE 8: e60878. Google Scholar

12.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2012. Guideline for evaluating insecticide resistance in vectors using the CDC bottle bioassay. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Google Scholar

13.

Chang, C., W. K. Shen, T. T. Wang, Y. H. Lin, E. L. Hsu, and S. M. Dai. 2009. A novel amino acid substitution in a voltage-gated sodium channel is associated with knockdown resistance to permethrin in Aedes aegypti. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 39: 272–278. Google Scholar

14.

Chung, H. H., I. C. Cheng, Y. C. Chen, C. Lin, T. Tomita, and H. J. Teng. 2019. Voltage-gated sodium channel intron polymorphism and four mutations comprise six haplotypes in an Aedes aegypti population in Taiwan. Plos Negl. Trop. Dis. 13: e0007291. Google Scholar

15.

de Lera Ruiz, M., and R. L. Kraus. 2015. Voltage-gated sodium channels: structure, function, pharmacology, and clinical indications. J. Med. Chem. 58: 7093–7118. Google Scholar

16.

Donnelly, M. J., V. Corbel, D. Weetman, C. S. Wilding, M. S. Williamson, and W. C. Black, 4th . 2009. Does kdr genotype predict insecticide-resistance phenotype in mosquitoes? Trends Parasitol. 25: 213–219. Google Scholar

17.

Du, Y., Y. Nomura, G. Satar, Z. Hu, R. Nauen, S. Y. He, B. S. Zhorov, and K. Dong. 2013. Molecular evidence for dual pyrethroid-receptor sites on a mosquito sodium channel. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110: 11785–11790. Google Scholar

18.

Du, Y., Y. Nomura, B. Zhorov, and K. Dong. 2016. Sodium channel mutations and pyrethroid resistance in Aedes aegypti. Insects 7: 60. Google Scholar

19.

Dusfour, I., P. Zorrilla, A. Guidez, J. Issaly, R. Girod, L. Guillaumot, C. Robello, and C. Strode. 2015. Deltamethrin resistance mechanisms in Aedes aegypti populations from three French overseas territories worldwide. Plos Negl. Trop. Dis. 9: e0004226. Google Scholar

20.

Essandoh, J., A. E. Yawson, and D. Weetman. 2013. Acetylcholinesterase (Ace-1) target site mutation 119S is strongly diagnostic of carbamate and organophosphate resistance in Anopheles gambiae s.s. and Anopheles coluzzii across southern Ghana. Malar. J. 12: 404. Google Scholar

21.

Fang, Y., W. Q. Shi, J. T. Wu, Y. Y. Li, J. B. Xue, and Y. Zhang. 2019. Resistance to pyrethroid and organophosphate insecticides, and the geographical distribution and polymorphisms of target-site mutations in voltage-gated sodium channel and acetylcholinesterase 1 genes in Anopheles sinensis populations in Shanghai, China. Parasit. Vectors 12: 396. Google Scholar

22.

Fang, Y., T. Ernest, J.-B. Xue, Y. Zhang, X.-N. Zhou, and E. Khater. 2021. Detection of DENV-2 and insect-specific flaviviruses in mosquitoes collected from Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 11: 626368. Google Scholar

23.

Gloria-Soria, A., D. Ayala, A. Bheecarry, O. Calderon-Arguedas, D. D. Chadee, M. Chiappero, M. Coetzee, K. B. Elahee, I. Fernandez-Salas, H. A. Kamal, et al. 2016. Global genetic diversity of Aedes aegypti. Mol. Ecol. 25: 5377–5395. Google Scholar

24.

Hall, T. A. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 41: 95–98. Google Scholar

25.

Harris, A. F., S. Rajatileka, and H. Ranson. 2010. Pyrethroid resistance in Aedes aegypti from Grand Cayman. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 83: 277–284. Google Scholar

26.

Hasmiwati, H., S. R. Rusjdi, and E. Nofita. 2018. Detection of Ace-1 gene with insecticides resistance in Aedes aegypti populations from DHF-endemic areas in Padang, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 19: 31–36. Google Scholar

27.

Heilman, J. M., J. De Wolff, G. M. Beards, and B. J. Basden. 2014. Dengue fever: a Wikipedia clinical review. Open Med. 8: e105–e115. Google Scholar

28.

Hemingway, J., and H. Ranson. 2000. Insecticide resistance in insect vectors of human disease. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 45: 371–391. Google Scholar

29.

Hirata, K., O. Komagata, K. Itokawa, A. Yamamoto, T. Tomita, and S. Kasai. 2014. A single crossing-over event in voltage-sensitive Na+ channel genes may cause critical failure of dengue mosquito control by insecticides. Plos Negl. Trop. Dis. 8: e3085. Google Scholar

30.

Huchard, E., M. Martinez, H. Alout, E. J. Douzery, G. Lutfalla, A. Berthomieu, C. Berticat, M. Raymond, and M. Weill. 2006. Acetylcholinesterase genes within the Diptera: takeover and loss in true flies. Proc. Biol. Sci. 273: 2595–2604. Google Scholar

31.

Jones, C. M., C. Machin, K. Mohammed, S. Majambere, A. S. Ali, B. O. Khatib, J. McHa, H. Ranson, and L. A. Kelly-Hope. 2012. Insecticide resistance in Culex quinquefasciatus from Zanzibar: implications for vector control programmes. Parasit. Vectors 5: 78. Google Scholar

32.

Kawada, H., S. Z. Oo, S. Thaung, E. Kawashima, Y. N. Maung, H. M. Thu, K. Z. Thant, and N. Minakawa. 2014. Co-occurrence of point mutations in the voltage-gated sodium channel of pyrethroid-resistant Aedes aegypti populations in Myanmar. Plos Negl. Trop. Dis. 8: e3032. Google Scholar

33.

Kawada, H., Y. Higa, K. Futami, Y. Muranami, E. Kawashima, J. H. Osei, K. Y. Sakyi, S. Dadzie, D. K. de Souza, M. Appawu, et al. 2016. Discovery of point mutations in the voltage-gated sodium channel from African Aedes aegypti populations: potential phylogenetic reasons for gene introgression. Plos Negl. Trop. Dis. 10: e0004780. Google Scholar

34.

Khater, E. I., M. M. Sowilem, M. F. Sallam, and A. M. Alahmed. 2013. Ecology and habitat characterization of mosquitoes in Saudi Arabia. Trop. Biomed. 30: 409–427. Google Scholar

35.

Kimura, M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16: 111–120. Google Scholar

36.

Komagata, O., S. Kasai, I. Obara, N. Motoyama, I. Tanaka, M. Kobayashi, and T. Tomita. 2008. Concomitant identification of subspecies and insecticide resistance-associated mutations in the mosquito Culex pipiens complex by primer extension-based genotyping. Med. Entomol. Zool. 59: 33–46. Google Scholar

37.

Kumar, S., G. Stecher, and K. Tamura. 2016. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33: 1870–1874. Google Scholar

38.

Kushwah, R. B., C. L. Dykes, N. Kapoor, T. Adak, and O. P. Singh. 2015. Pyrethroid-resistance and presence of two knockdown resistance (kdr) mutations, F1534C and a novel mutation T1520I, in Indian Aedes aegypti. Plos Negl. Trop. Dis. 9: e3332. Google Scholar

39.

Larkin, M. A., G. Blackshields, N. P. Brown, R. Chenna, P. A. McGettigan, H. McWilliam, F. Valentin, I. M. Wallace, A. Wilm, R. Lopez, et al. 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23: 2947–2948. Google Scholar

40.

Li, T., L. Zhang, W. R. Reid, Q. Xu, K. Dong, and N. Liu. 2012. Multiple mutations and mutation combinations in the sodium channel of permethrin resistant mosquitoes, Culex quinquefasciatus. Sci. Rep. 2: 781. Google Scholar

41.

Li, C. X., P. E. Kaufman, R. D. Xue, M. H. Zhao, G. Wang, T. Yan, X. X. Guo, Y. M. Zhang, Y. D. Dong, D. Xing, et al. 2015. Relationship between insecticide resistance and kdr mutations in the dengue vector Aedes aegypti in Southern China. Parasit. Vectors 8: 325. Google Scholar

42.

Liu, N. 2015. Insecticide resistance in mosquitoes: impact, mechanisms, and research directions. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 60: 537–559. Google Scholar

43.

Lynch, M. 2002. Intron evolution as a population-genetic process. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99: 6118–6123. Google Scholar

44.

Marcombe, S., B. Fustec, J. Cattel, S. Chonephetsarath, P. Thammavong, N. Phommavanh, J. P. David, V. Corbel, I. W. Sutherland, J. C. Hertz, et al. 2019. Distribution of insecticide resistance and mechanisms involved in the arbovirus vector Aedes aegypti in Laos and implication for vector control. Plos Negl. Trop. Dis. 13: e0007852. Google Scholar

45.

Martins, A. J., J. B. Lima, A. A. Peixoto, and D. Valle. 2009a. Frequency of Val1016Ile mutation in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene of Aedes aegypti Brazilian populations. Trop. Med. Int. Health. 14: 1351–1355. Google Scholar

46.

Martins, A. J., R. M. Lins, J. G. Linss, A. A. Peixoto, and D. Valle. 2009b. Voltage-gated sodium channel polymorphism and metabolic resistance in pyrethroid-resistant Aedes aegypti from Brazil. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 81: 108–115. Google Scholar

47.

Martins, A. J., L. P. Brito, J. G. Linss, G. B. Rivas, R. Machado, R. V. Bruno, J. B. Lima, D. Valle, and A. A. Peixoto. 2013. Evidence for gene duplication in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene of Aedes aegypti. Evol. Med. Public Health 2013: 148–160. Google Scholar

48.

Miller, B. R., M. S. Godsey, M. B. Crabtree, H. M. Savage, Y. Al-Mazrao, M. H. Al-Jeffri, A. M. Abdoon, S. M. Al-Seghayer, A. M. Al-Shahrani, and T. G. Ksiazek. 2002. Isolation and genetic characterization of Rift Valley fever virus from Aedes vexans arabiensis, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 8: 1492–1494. Google Scholar

49.

Miller, M. A., W. Pfeiffer, and T. Schwartz. 2010. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees, pp. 1–8. In Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE). New Orleans, LA. Google Scholar

50.

Ministry of Health of Saudi Arabia. 2019. The statistical yearbook, 2018G. 04/1439-1403/1440H.  http://ghdx.healthdata.org/organizations/ministry-health-saudi-arabia. Accessed 22 March 2021. Google Scholar

51.

Ministry of Health of Saudi Arabia. 2020. The statistical yearbook, 2019G. 04/1439-1403/1440H.  http://ghdx.healthdata.org/organizations/ministry-health-saudi-arabia. Accessed 22 March 2021. Google Scholar

52.

Mohammed, M. S., A. D. Abakar, B. Y. Nour, and O. M. Dafalla. 2018. Molecular surveillance of dengue infections in Sabya Governorate of Jazan region, Southwestern Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Mosq. Res. 5: 125–132. Google Scholar

53.

Moyes, C. L., J. Vontas, A. J. Martins, L. C. Ng, S. Y. Koou, I. Dusfour, K. Raghavendra, J. Pinto, V. Corbel, J. P. David, et al. 2017. Contemporary status of insecticide resistance in the major Aedes vectors of arboviruses infecting humans. Plos Negl. Trop. Dis. 11: e0005625. Google Scholar

54.

Organji, S. R., H. H. Abulreesh, and G. E. Osman. 2017. Circulation of dengue virus serotypes in the City of Makkah, Saudi Arabia, as determined by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 2017: 1646701. Google Scholar

55.

Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817–818. Google Scholar

56.

Rajatileka, S., W. C. Black, 4th , K. Saavedra-Rodriguez, Y. Trongtokit, C. Apiwathnasorn, P. J. McCall, and H. Ranson. 2008. Development and application of a simple colorimetric assay reveals widespread distribution of sodium channel mutations in Thai populations of Aedes aegypti. Acta Trop. 108: 54–57. Google Scholar

57.

Ronquist, F., M. Teslenko, P. van der Mark, D. L. Ayres, A. Darling, S. Höhna, B. Larget, L. Liu, M. A. Suchard, and J. P. Huelsenbeck. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61: 539–542. Google Scholar

58.

Saavedra-Rodriguez, K., L. Urdaneta-Marquez, S. Rajatileka, M. Moulton, A. E. Flores, I. Fernandez-Salas, J. Bisset, M. Rodriguez, P. J. McCall, M. J. Donnelly, et al. 2007. A mutation in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene associated with pyrethroid resistance in Latin American Aedes aegypti. Insect Mol. Biol. 16: 785–798. Google Scholar

59.

Sarkar, M., A. Borkotoki, I. Baruah, I. K. Bhattacharyya, and R. B. Srivastava. 2009. Molecular analysis of knock down resistance (kdr) mutation and distribution of kdr genotypes in a wild population of Culex quinquefasciatus from India. Trop. Med. Int. Health 14: 1097–1104. Google Scholar

60.

Sayedahmed, M. 2016. Incidence history of West Nile virus in Africa and Middle East, with an emphasis on Egypt: a review. J. Dairy Vet. Anim. Res. 3: 00080. Google Scholar

61.

Sayono, S., A. P. Hidayati, S. Fahri, D. Sumanto, E. Dharmana, S. Hadisaputro, P. B. Asih, and D. Syafruddin. 2016. Distribution of voltage-gated sodium channel (Nav) alleles among the Aedes aegypti populations in Central Java Province and its association with resistance to pyrethroid insecticides. PLoS ONE 11: e0150577. Google Scholar

62.

Scott, J. G., M. H. Yoshimizu, and S. Kasai. 2015. Pyrethroid resistance in Culex pipiens mosquitoes. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 120: 68–76. Google Scholar

63.

Siller, Q., G. Ponce, S. Lozano, and A. E. Flores. 2011. Update on the frequency of Ile1016 mutation in voltage-gated sodium channel gene of Aedes aegypti in Mexico. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 27: 357–362. Google Scholar

64.

Soderlund, D. M., and D. C. Knipple. 2003. The molecular biology of knockdown resistance to pyrethroid insecticides. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 33: 563–577. Google Scholar

65.

Sokhna, C., M. O. Ndiath, and C. Rogier. 2013. The changes in mosquito vector behaviour and the emerging resistance to insecticides will challenge the decline of malaria. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 19: 902–907. Google Scholar

66.

Srisawat, R., N. Komalamisra, Y. Eshita, M. Zheng, K. Ono, T. Itoh, A. Matsumoto, S. Petmitr, and Y. Rongsriyam. 2010. Point mutations in domain II of the voltage-gated sodium channel gene in deltamethrin-resistant Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 45: 275–282. Google Scholar

67.

Stenhouse, S. A., S. Plernsub, J. Yanola, N. Lumjuan, A. Dantrakool, W. Choochote, and P. Somboon. 2013. Detection of the V1016G mutation in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) by allele-specific PCR assay, and its distribution and effect on deltamethrin resistance in Thailand. Parasit. Vectors 6: 253. Google Scholar

68.

Vera-Maloof, F. Z., K. Saavedra-Rodriguez, A. E. Elizondo-Quiroga, S. Lozano-Fuentes, and W. C. Black Iv . 2015. Coevolution of the Ile1,016 and Cys1,534 mutations in the voltage gated sodium channel gene of Aedes aegypti in Mexico. Plos Negl. Trop. Dis. 9: e0004263. Google Scholar

69.

Weaver, S. C., C. Charlier, N. Vasilakis, and M. Lecuit. 2018. Zika, chikungunya, and other emerging vector-borne viral diseases. Annu. Rev. Med. 69: 395–408. Google Scholar

70.

Weill, M., G. Lutfalla, K. Mogensen, F. Chandre, A. Berthomieu, C. Berticat, N. Pasteur, A. Philips, P. Fort, and M. Raymond. 2003. Comparative genomics: insecticide resistance in mosquito vectors. Nature 423: 136–137. Google Scholar

71.

World Health Organization (WHO). 2013. Test procedures for insecticide resistance monitoring in malaria vector mosquitoes. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland. Google Scholar

72.

World Health Organization (WHO). 2019. World malaria report 2019. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland. Google Scholar

73.

Wilgenbusch, J. C., and D. Swofford. 2003. Inferring evolutionary trees with PAUP*. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics 6: 6.4. Google Scholar

74.

Wuliandari, J. R., S. F. Lee, V. L. White, W. Tantowijoyo, A. A. Hoffmann, and N. M. Endersby-Harshman. 2015. Association between three mutations, F1565C, V1023G and S996P, in the voltage-sensitive sodium channel gene and knockdown resistance in Aedes aegypti from Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Insects 6: 658–685. Google Scholar

75.

Xu, Q., L. Zhang, T. Li, L. Zhang, L. He, K. Dong, and N. Liu. 2012. Evolutionary adaptation of the amino acid and codon usage of the mosquito sodium channel following insecticide selection in the field mosquitoes. PLoS ONE 7: e47609. Google Scholar

76.

Yanola, J., P. Somboon, C. Walton, W. Nachaiwieng, and L.-A. Prapanthadara. 2010. A novel F1552/C1552 point mutation in the Aedes aegypti voltage-gated sodium channel gene associated with permethrin resistance. Pestic. Biochem. Phys. 96: 127–131. Google Scholar

77.

Yanola, J., P. Somboon, C. Walton, W. Nachaiwieng, P. Somwang, and L. A. Prapanthadara. 2011. High-throughput assays for detection of the F1534C mutation in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene in permethrin-resistant Aedes aegypti and the distribution of this mutation throughout Thailand. Trop. Med. Int. Health. 16: 501–509. Google Scholar
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America.
Yuan Fang, Ernest Tambo, Jing-Bo Xue, Yi Zhang, Xiao-Nong Zhou, and Emad I. M. Khater "Molecular Analysis of Targeted Insecticide Resistance Gene Mutations in Field-Caught Mosquitos of Medical Importance From Saudi Arabia," Journal of Medical Entomology 58(4), 1839-1848, (17 April 2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjab048
Received: 12 December 2020; Accepted: 27 February 2021; Published: 17 April 2021
JOURNAL ARTICLE
10 PAGES


Share
SHARE
KEYWORDS
acetylcholinesterase 1 gene
Aedes aegypti
Culex quinquefasciatus
dengue
knockdown resistance gene
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top