Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
21 February 2022 Seasonality and Biting Behavior of Mansonia (Diptera, Culicidae) in Rural Settlements Near Porto Velho, State of Rondônia, Brazil
Allan Kardec R. Galardo, Andréa V. Hijjar, Liliane Leite O. Falcão, Dario P. Carvalho, Kaio Augusto N. Ribeiro, Guilherme A. Silveira, Noel Fernandes S. Neto, José F. Saraiva
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Mansonia (Diptera: Culicidae) are known to cause discomfort to the local populations of Amazon. Considering the fact that the effective control of these mosquitoes can only be obtained by understanding their ecology and behavior, entomological monitoring becomes essential. In view of this, mosquitoes of the genus Mansonia were collected by human landing catches (HLC) from 2015 to 2019, in four locations of Porto Velho, Rondônia, Brazil. The collections were performed inside and outside the homes, once in every four months, uninterrupted for 24 hr. Human bite indices/hour was used to analyze the hourly activity of the species for different seasons and environment (indoor and outdoor). Moreover, nonparametric Mann–Whitney tests were conducted to indicate if there were differences between exophagic and endophagic behavior. The seasonality of Mansonia species was also analyzed. Overall, 96,766 specimens were collected over five years of sampling. Mansonia titillans (Walker) was found to be the most abundant species (76.9%). The highest percentage of mosquitoes was collected in February (48.4%), followed by October (39.6%) and June (12.0%). The biting activity of the two most abundant species showed peak host seeking activity/behavior during twilight and night, more perceptible in the outdoor environment (peridomiciliary). In general, seasonality showed a tendency towards a reduction in the abundance of Mansonia in the years after 2015. Our results will be essential in the formulation of effective control methodology for Mansonia in the studied area.

Mansonia Blanchard (1901) are large to medium-sized mosquitoes, with a truncated abdomen and a body covered by broad intercalated dark brown and yellowish scales, giving the wings an asymmetrical appearance (Harbach 2019). The genus is classified into two sub-genera, Mansonia and Mansonioides. The subgenus Mansonia only occurs in the New World, while the subgenus Mansonioides occurs in the Old World (Ronderos and Bachmann 1963, Darsie and Ward 2005, Harbach 2019). Most species are adapted to tropical climates, which explains their diversity in the neotropical region, where 15 species have been recorded (Harbach 2019, WRBU 2020).

The most notable characteristic of Mansonia is the adaptation of the spiracular apparatus (siphon and trumpet) in larvae and pupae that allows their attachment to the submerged parts of aquatic plants to obtain oxygen from the aerenchyma sacs (Laurence 1960, Belkin et al. 1970). Some species of Mansonia are more general in terms of their preference to the variety of aquatic plants, whereas others are species-specific (aquatic plant) (Chandra et al. 2006). Macrophytes of the genus Pistia (water lettuce) are the most common plants associated with Mansonia. Immature stages usually occur in permanent aquatic habitats that are densely covered by macrophytes (Forattini 2002, Rattanarithikul et al. 2006). In general, the control of mosquitoes requires choice of methodologies based on entomological monitoring data, obtained through field monitoring of the species, that allows more effective control of important species (Becker et al. 2010).

Mansonia are aggressive biters, causing serious discomfort to their hosts (Tadei et al. 1991, Harbach 2019). Hematophagic activity is predominantly nocturnal, with peaks at morning and dusk (Harbach 2019), feeding on both humans and domestic or wild mammals (Luz and Lourenço-de-Oliveira 1996, Kengne et al. 2003). Females are strongly attracted by artificial light, but predominately bites in outdoor (exophilic) environment, with only exploratory indoor activities (or endophilic), characterized as visiting behavior (Tadei et al. 1991, Navarro-Silva et al. 2004).

The visiting behavior (endophilic) in Mansonia is still controversial. It was noticed from continued observations in the Southeast region of Brazil that the anthropic changes in the environment, favor the populations of these mosquitoes (Forattini and Massad 1998). Thus, after anthropic modifications such as the installation of an artificial irrigation system or the clearing of the land for agricultural purposes, a stimulus of increased indoor biting has been observed. Hence, it strengthens the hypothesis of the presence of a high adaptive capacity to supervening conditions combined with a considerable power of dispersal. Moreover, the communities closer to the breeding sites showed more abundance of mosquitoes and higher rate of mosquito bites (Rueda 2007).

Fig. 1.

Location of sampling sites for adult Mansonia mosquitoes with human landing catches (HLC) in Porto Velho, State of Rondônia, Brazil.

img-z2-9_883.jpg

Although the entire Amazon region is favorable to the proliferation of these mosquitoes, entomological monitoring studies to control Mansonia have not been carried out yet. The present study aimed to identify the species of the genus Mansonia occurring in four locations of Porto Velho, determine the dominant species in the affected settlements, monitor populations to verify seasonal patterns, and study the biting behavior inside and outside the households. The selection of the studied areas was based on the abrupt increase of mosquitoes in the selected localities after the historic flooding in 2014, which will allow evaluation of the impacts of macrophyte control actions developed by the Santo Antônio hydroelectric plant after 2015. The data obtained will also help with valuable information for planning Mansonia control strategies.

Materials and Methods

Study Site

The present study was carried out in the municipality of Porto Velho, Rondônia, Northern Brazil. The sampled locations are close to the Santo Antônio Energia (SAE) reservoir (Fig. 1). The SAE uses the hydroelectric power generation system, with low potential for altering the water flow and lower river damming, consequently, this type of dam has a lower environmental impact than conventional storage dams (Csiki and Rhoads 2010, Almeida et al. 2019). However, flooding cycles are common in the Madeira River and its tributaries. According to Köppen classification, the climate is Aw – Rainy tropical climate, with an average temperature ranging from 21°C to 34°C, with rare occasions when the temperature reaches 18°C. The photoperiod is approximately 11 hr and 4 min, with the sun rising at 7:10 a.m. and setting at 6:14 p.m. The average rainfall ranges from a maximum of 264 mm to a minimum of 17 mm per month. The rainy season is from October to April, and the dry season is from June to August, with transition periods in May and September (Ab'Sáber 2003).

Table 1.

Species composition and frequencies of Mansonia spp. collected inside and outside households, according to the capture periods. Peak of rainy: first annual sampling (February), Dry season: second annual sampling (June) and Beginning of the rainy: third annual sampling (October), from 2015 to 2019.

img-AK2_883.gif

Mosquitoes were captured over a period of five years, from 2015 to 2019, with three annual samplings, where the 1st sampling was done in February, 2nd sampling in June, and the 3rd sampling in October each year. The 1st sampling coincides with the rainy season or full peak of the Madeira River and its tributaries, the 2nd sampling with the dry period, and the 3rd sampling with the beginning of the rains in the region.

The collections were carried out by two collectors, simultaneously, inside and outside the homes, in four locations in the municipality of Porto Velho, Rondônia, Brazil. Three collection points were located in the rural settlement of Joana D'Arc, on the extension roads; Line 09 (08°58′38.6″S; 064°19′07.2″W). Line 15 (09°03′45.5″S; 064°25′05.1″W) and Line 17 (09°03′12.2″S; 064°29′40.0″W). The fourth site was on the opposite bank of Madeira River, in the rural area of Jaci-Paraná district, Rio Contra (09°18′35.0″S; 064°26′45.0″W). The sampled locations were spaced at 8.51 km (between line 17 and line 15), 14 km (between line 15 and line 09), and 28 km (between line 15 and Jaci-Paraná, Rio Contra), in a straight line (Fig. 1).

Mosquito Collection and Processing

Mosquitoes were collected, simultaneously, inside and outside the homes, using the human landing catches (HLC) (Brasil 2019). The collections lasted uninterrupted for 24 hr at each sampled site to assess the biting activity of Mansonia spp. The sites were sampled on different and alternate days by two teams, one team each for indoor and outdoor, with a total of eight collectors, so that each collector spends a maximum of 6 hr collecting mosquitoes. After the first round of collection at the first site, the collectors changed times and places of capture (indoor switched to outdoor, and vice versa). The same pattern was maintained at the second, third, and fourth studied sites. This methodology also reduces the eventual collector effect, where one collector is more attractive to mosquitoes than other collectors. The total sampling effort was 144 hr/location/yr, or 192 hr/mo per sampling. The collection with HLC was approved by the research ethics committee of the Instituto de Pesquisas Científicas e Tecnológicas do Amapá. (CAAE No. 43415115.1.0000.0001).

The mosquitoes were collected with a glass aspirator and stored in screened cups, labeled with the hour of capture. The mosquito cups were placed in a polystyrene box for transport to the laboratory, at the SAE facilities, in Porto Velho, Rondônia. The specimens were sacrificed with ethyl acetate vapors and identified using a stereomicroscope and dichotomous keys (Lane 1953) with a taxonomic review study (Barbosa et al. 2007). Damaged mosquitoes were determined as ‘Mansonia sp.’. The voucher of the collected species was deposited in the scientific collection of the Institute of Scientific and Technological Research of Amapá (IEPA), as reference material for further studies in Mansonia taxonomy.

Data Analysis

The human bite index (HBI), estimated by dividing the number of mosquitoes (N) in a given area, by the number of catchers (NC) and by the number of collection hours (NH) (Clements 1999), was calculated for each sampling, inside and outside the house. Subsequently, we tested the normality of our data with the Shapiro–Wilk test. Indoor and outdoor abundance were compared to test the visiting behavior hypothesis using the nonparametric Mann–Whitney test (W). For the hourly activity, we selected the two most abundant species in the study and generated radial graphs with hourly HBI values for each hour of the 24 hr of collection. Subsequently, Spearman (S) correction tests were conducted to explore any likely correlations between abundance and meteorological factors ( Supp Table S1 [online only] (tjac016_suppl_supplementary_table_s1.docx)). Then, graphs of temperature (°C), relative air humidity (%), and accumulated monthly rainfall (mm) were compared with the HBI in each location.

All analyses, graphs and maps were developed using the R v 4.0.2 program (R Core Team 2020), and the ggplot2 package (Wickham 2011). Temperature and relative humidity data were measured with a thermohygrometer at each sampled location, and rainfall was verified at the Santo Antônio Energia meteorological station (SAE).

Results

Overall, 96,766 specimens of the genus Mansonia Blanchard were collected over the five years of sampling. Six species were identified: Ma. titillans (Walker, 1848) [76.9% of total], Ma. humeralis Dyar and Knab, 1916 [13.1%], Ma. indubitans Dyar and Shannon, 1925 [2.8%], Ma. pseudotitillans (Theobald, 1901) [0.3%], Ma. amazonensis (Theobald, 1901) [0.2%], and Ma. flaveola (Coquillett, 1906) [0.02%]. 6,472 (6.7%) specimens were registered as ‘Mansonia sp.’ as they were damaged and made identification impossible (Table 1).

The highest number of specimens was collected in the Joana D`Arc settlement: 81,093 (83.8%). The remaining 15,673 (16.2%) specimens were captured in Rio Contra. At the Joana D'Arc settlement, most specimens were sampled on line 17, n = 53,589 (55.4%), followed by line 15, n = 22,487 (23.2%), and line 9, n = 5,017 (5.2%) (Table 2). The abundance of Mansonia spp. along the sampling events varied with the highest number of specimens observed in the rainy season (46,819 – 48.4%), followed by the number of specimens observed in the beginning of rains, in October (38,271 – 39.6%) and, finally, in the dry season (11,676 – 12.0%) (Table 2). The first and second samples had the same richness of five species. In the beginning of rainy season, or third annual sampling, six species were recorded, including Ma. flaveola (Table 1). It was observed that the seasonal HBI, over the five years of study, was higher in the rainy season (HBI = 46.62, SD = 32.59), followed by the beginning of rainy season (HBI = 42.01, SD = 37.17), and lower in the dry season (HBI = 12.16, 14.83).

More specimens were collected from the outdoors (65.3%) in comparison to the indoors (34.7%) (Table 2). A similar result was observed when the specimens were analyzed separately by species and season of the year, with most of the specimens occurring outdoors. The only exceptions were Ma. pseudotitillans and Ma. humeralis, which showed higher biting activity indoors on two occasions (Rio Contra and Line 15) (Table 1).

Based on the meteorological factors and the amount of Mansonia spp. there was a positive correlation between the relative humidity and Ma. titillans bites, both outdoors (S = 6661, p < 0.001), and indoors (S = 6774, p < 0.001). Another correlation was obtained between the temperature and the reduction of bites, indoors (S = 7795, p < 0.001) and outdoors (S = 1979, p < 0.001). Although some correlations were detected between the meteorological factors and, the increase or decrease of mosquito bites, all such results showed a weak correlation.

Table 2.

Number, relative frequency, and frequency of Mansonia spp. in the three annual sampling periods. Peak of rainy: first annual sampling (February), Dry season: second annual sampling (June), and Beginning of rainy: third annual sampling (October), from 2015 to 2019.

img-AYF_883.gif

Biting Behavior

The two most abundant species in the study, Ma. titillans and Ma. humeralis, were also predominantly nocturnal species (Fig. 2). Peaks in biting activity were observed in the initial hours of capture (6:00–7:00 p.m. and 7:00–8:00 p.m.) after dusk. During the rainy season (February), peak activity was observed during 7:00–8:00 p.m., with successive declines in the number of captured mosquitoes, and with higher bite indices observed outside the homes throughout the night ( Supp Table S2 [online only] (tjac016_suppl_supplementary_table_s2.docx)). The only exception regarding the predominance of mosquitoes was observed in the dry season (June) outside the homes, especially for Ma. titillans (Fig. 2).

In the beginning of rainy season, higher bite indices were recorded between 7:00–8:00 p.m., outside the homes ( Supp Table S3 [online only] (tjac016_suppl_supplementary_table_s3.docx)), for both Ma. titillans and Ma. humeralis. HBI were lower (HBI = 5 – Ma. titillans e HBI = 10 – Ma. humeralis) indoors, with more peaks throughout the night for Ma. titillans, and between 6:00–7:00 p.m. for Ma. humeralis. During the rainy season, the biting pattern was similar to October, with a predominance of bites outside the homes, and peak activities between 7:00–8:00 p.m. Inside the homes, Ma. humeralis had a higher HBI value (10) than Ma. titillans (HBI = 5). Throughout the day, the HBI values were low (between 5–10), with values higher in the rainy season as compared to those obtained in the dry season, especially inside the homes (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Radial bar graph (24 hr) showing activity pattern with HBI bite index for Mansonia titillans (left) and Ma. humeralis (right) for the season; rainy, dry, and early rains in the region, respectively, inside, and outside households, using human landings (HLC). The values presented refer to W = Mann–Whitney and p-value of significance between inside and outside by species.

img-z5-9_883.jpg

Seasonal Variation

The number of collected specimens of Mansonia spp. fluctuated throughout the sampling events, with the highest numbers being obtained in 2015, and the numbers of these collected specimens decreased in the consecutive years from 2016 to 2019. In addition, the highest abundance of Mansonia was observed in the 2nd annual sampling event (dry season) in 2015. However, from 2016 to 2019, the highest annual HBI rates were observed in the 1st annual sampling event (peak of the rainy season) each year (Fig. 3).

The decomposition of the raw data obtained for the time series and the meteorological factors are shown in Fig. 3. The adjusted dataset helped to detect a prominent peak in the 2nd annual sampling of 2015 (June/2015), and two smaller peaks in the 1st (February) and 3rd (October) 2017 samplings. A downward trend was also observed in the amount of Mansonia spp. in subsequent years (Fig. 3).

Discussion

The results obtained in this study demonstrate an overview of the biting behavior of Mansonia in four locations near the city of Porto Velho, Rondônia. Entomological monitoring in the Amazon region generally focuses on the study of disease vectors, such as Anopheles darlingi, which is an important vector of malaria in the Amazon region. (Tadei 1996, Quintero et al. 1996, Ferreira 1999, Tadei and Thatcher 2000, Cruz et al. 2009). In case of genus Mansonia, the prerequisite of medical importance cannot be applied, as there are no occurrences in Brazil yet that can relate them to the transmission of human diseases (Atoni et al. 2019). However, due to their aggressive behavior during blood meals, this group of mosquitoes causes damage to farm animals and causes extreme nuisance for the local human population (Rueda 2007).

Fig. 3.

Decomposition of HBI and meteorological factors (temperature, relative humidity, and monthly accumulated rainfall) in four rural locations in Porto Velho, State of Rondônia, Brazil from 2015 to 2019.

img-z6-1_883.jpg

Entomological inventories conducted in the Amazon basin have already recorded the six species of Mansonia that are in the present study (Ferreira 1999, 2003; Hutchings et al. 2008, 2020). The greater diversity and abundance of the genus Mansonia has been reported in the areas close to white-water lakes or muddy rivers (Ferreira 1999, Araújo et al. 2020), as compared to dark water rivers, such as the Negro River (Hutchings et al. 2005, 2013, 2016). The Madeira River, characterized as a white-water river, is the largest tributary of the Amazon River basin, which is characterized by a high load of suspended sediments, alone being responsible for approximately 50% of the total suspended load transported along the Amazon River to the Atlantic Ocean (Latrubesse et al. 2005, Barbosa et al. 2007). This feature of the Madeira River may be providing adequate nutritional conditions for the proliferation of macrophytes (Chambers et al. 2007), especially on its banks and nearby lakes, formed by the natural cycle of flood and drought of the river.

Ma. titillans and Ma. humeralis were more abundant throughout the study. The prevalence of these two species is mainly due to the presence of water lettuce (Pistia spp.) and water hyacinth (Eichornia crassipes Mart, 1883) in breeding sites close to the studied area. These species of macrophyte are considered to be the preferred host plant for the larvae of Ma. titillans (Carpenter and LaCasse 1955). In addition, Ma. titillans is known to fly several kilometers in the open, flying across swamps, ponds, and lakes, to obtain blood meals or an ideal place for oviposition (Verdonschot and Besse-Lototskaya 2014). The lakes and backwaters adjacent to the Madeira River are probably the main breeding grounds for the species collected in the areas of the study. However, further investigations such as capture-mark-release-and-recapture may better assess the role of these breeding sites in maintaining local populations of Mansonia in the settlements.

Regarding our results of biting activity and preference for hematophagy inside or outside the homes, we observed that both Ma. titillans and Ma. humeralis are nocturnal and crepuscular, with preference for attacks outside the homes. These results did not differ from the previous studies of Ma. titillans from other regions of Brazil and Argentina (Consoli and Lourenço-de-Oliveira 1994, Forattini and Massad 1998, Forattini 2002, Darsie and Ward 2005, Harbach 2019), but revealed that the same behavior occurs with Ma. humeralis. In addition, with an uninterrupted 24-hr of sampling effort, our results present empirical evidence indicating a preference for the outdoor environment, thereby reinforcing the hypothesis of the visiting behavior (Forattini and Massad 1998), which may have direct implications for the control of adults.

The rainy season presented greater abundance of Mansonia spp. as compared to the dry periods and the beginning of the rains. This was also observed in the populations of Ma. titillans in the State of Pará (Araújo et al. 2020). In addition, our data highlights the abundance of Mansonia spp. collected in the early years of the study, considering that the seasonality analysis shows a downward trend in the local Mansonia population. Unprecedented wet conditions were reported in the summer of 2014 (December–March) in southwestern Amazonia, with a rainfall of about 100% above normal. Discharge into Madeira River (main tributary of the southern Amazon) was 74% higher than normal (58,000 m3/s) in Porto Velho (Espinoza et al. 2014). These flood conditions on the Madeira River may have provided viable breeding grounds for mosquitoes, especially in areas that were not previously flooded, and thus could explain the high abundance of these mosquitoes in the beginning of entomological monitoring of this study.

Other factors which may influence the occurrence of these mosquitoes in the studied areas are: deforestation, especially in recently deforested areas for pasture and logging (Ferraguti et al. 2016), hematophagic eclecticism of the species (Luz and Lourenço-de-Oliveira 1996, Kengne et al. 2003), presence of farm animals, like cattle, pigs, goats and poultry (Becker et al. 2010), high dispersal capacity of Mansonia spp. (Rueda 2007) and the proximity of human settlements to potential breeding sites of these mosquitoes (Forattini 2002), especially on the tributaries of the Madeira river. These local conditions can intensify the biting activity, and therefore all of the above should be considered while formulating control strategies for these mosquitoes.

In summary, the present study contributed to the knowledge of the diversity, seasonality, and biting activity of Mansonia in four locations in Porto Velho, in the State of Rondônia. The dominant species in the area of study, Ma. titillans and Ma. humeralis, were characterized as predominantly exophilic species, with crepuscular and nocturnal habits. The abundance of both species was higher during the rainy season in the Amazon region (October to April); however, seasonality analyses showed successive reductions in mosquito density in the subsequent years. Additional investigations would be able to elucidate the oviposition and larval rearing sites, the preferred macrophyte species, and verify dispersal routes from the breeding sites to the blood meal sources. In this way, it also would be possible to propose control actions for the immature forms and management of the main macrophyte species related to the breeding of Mansonia spp. in the region.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary data are available at Journal of Medical Entomology online.

Supp Table 1. Weather factors collected in the field with on-site thermohydrometer, and hourly rainfall, obtained at the Santo Antônio Energia (SAE) weather station, Porto Velho, Rondônia State, Brazil.

Supp Table 2. Number of Mansonia spp. mosquitoes collected by hour and season, in outside the homes, using human landings (HLC), in four localities of Porto Velho, Rondônia Brazil.

Supp Table 3. Number of Mansonia spp. mosquitoes collected by hour and season, in inside the homes, using human landings (HLC), in four localities of Porto Velho, Rondônia Brazil.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Maria Anice Mureb Sallum for reviewing part of the mosquito identifications collected in this work. We are grateful to the technical and administrative staff of Santo Antônio Energia (SAE – Porto Velho, RO), for their support in field collections. In particular the financial support with a postdoctoral grant from Fundação para o Desenvolvimento da Universidade Estadual Paulista – FUNDUNESP granted to José Saraiva. We are also grateful for the collection license granted by SISBIO-IBAMA, number 65279-1. Funding was obtained from a Research and Development project from Santo Antônio Energia (Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica—ANEEL [project no. CT.PD.124.2018], project ‘Biomonitoring and Integrated Control of Mansonia mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in the region associated with the Santo Antônio Hydroelectric Power Plant lake on the Madeira River, Rondônia, Brazil’). The funding institution had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References Cited

1.

Ab'Sáber, A. N. 2003. Os domínios de natureza no Brasil: potencialidades paisagísticas, vol. 1. Ateliê editorial, Cotia, Brasil. Google Scholar

2.

de Araújo, W. S., T. M. Vieira, G. A. de Souza, I. C. Bezerra, P. H. C. Corgosinho, and M. A. Z. Borges . 2020. Nocturnal mosquitoes of Pará State in the Brazilian Amazon: species composition, habitat segregation, and seasonal variation. J. Med. Entomol. 57: 1913–1919. Google Scholar

3.

Atoni, E., L. Zhao, S. Karungu, V. Obanda, B. Agwanda, H. Xia, and Z. Yuan . 2019. The discovery and global distribution of novel mosquito-associated viruses in the last decade (2007–2017). Rev. Med. Virol. 29: e2079. Google Scholar

4.

Barbosa, A. A., M. A. Navarro-da-Silva, and M. A. M. Sallum . 2007. Mansonia (Mansonia) iguassuensis sp. nov. (Diptera: Culicidae) from Brasil. Zootaxa. 1527: 45–52. Google Scholar

5.

Bastos, W. R., R. de Almeida, J. G. Dórea, and A. C. Barbosa . 2007. Annual flooding and fish-mercury bioaccumulation in the environmentally impacted Rio Madeira (Amazon). Ecotoxicology. 16: 341–346. Google Scholar

6.

Becker, N., D. Petric, M. Zgomba, C. Boase, M. Madon, C. Dahl, and A. Kaiser . 2010. Mosquitoes and their control. Springer, Heidelberg Dordrecht London New York. Google Scholar

7.

Belkin, J. N., S. J. Heinemann, and W. A. Page . 1970. The Culicidae of Jamaica. (Mosquito Studies. XXI). Contrib. Am. Entomol. Inst. 6: 1–458. Google Scholar

8.

Brasil, Ministério da Saúde. 2019. Guia para o planejamento das ações de captura de anofelinos pela técnica de atração por humano protegido (TAHP) e acompanhamento dos riscos à saúde do profissional capturador. Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Brasília, Brasília, DF. Google Scholar

9.

Carpenter, S. J., and W. J. LaCasse . 1955. Mosquitoes of North America (north of Mexico), pp. 9–26. In P. A. Chambers, P. Lacoul, K. J. Murphy and S. M. Thomaz. Global diversity of aquatic macrophytes in freshwater. Berkeley, CA, University, Berkeley. Freshwater Animal Diversity Assessment, Springer, Dordrecht. Google Scholar

10.

Chambers, P. A., P. Lacoul, K. J. Murphy, and S. M. Thomaz . 2007. Global diversity of aquatic macrophytes in freshwater. Springer, Dordrecht, Berkeley, Londres. Google Scholar

11.

Chandra, G., A. Ghosh, D. Biswas, and S. N. Chatterjee . 2006. Host plant preference of Mansonia mosquitoes. J. Aquat. Plant Manag. 44: 142–144. Google Scholar

12.

Clements, A. N. 1999. The biology of mosquitoes: sensory reception and behaviour, vol. 2. CABI publishing, Stanford, United States. Google Scholar

13.

Consoli, R. A. G. B., and R. Lourenço-de-Oliveira . 1994. Principais mosquitos de importância sanitária no Brasil. Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Google Scholar

14.

Cruz, R. M. B., L. H. S. Gil, A. A. Silva, M. S. Araújo, and T. H. Katsuragawa . 2009. Mosquito abundance and behavior in the influence area of the hydroelectric complex on the Madeira River, Western Amazon, Brazil. Trans. R Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 103: 1174–1176. Google Scholar

15.

Csiki, S., and B. L. Rhoads . 2010. Hydraulic and geomorphological effects of run-of-river dams. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 34: 755–780. Google Scholar

16.

Darsie, R. F., and R. A. Ward . 2005. Identification and geographical distribution of the mosquitoes of North America, North of Mexico, 2nd ed. University Press of Florida, United States. Google Scholar

17.

Espinoza, J. C., J. A. Marengo, J. Ronchail, J. M. Carpio, L. N. Flores, and J. L. Guyot . 2014. The extreme 2014 flood in south-western Amazon basin: the role of tropical-subtropical South Atlantic SST gradient. Environ. Res. Lett. 9: 124007. Google Scholar

18.

Ferraguti, M., J. M. La Puente, D. Roiz, S. Ruiz, R. Soriguer, and J. Figuerola . 2016. Effects of landscape anthropization on mosquito community composition and abundance. Sci. Rep. 6: 1–9. Google Scholar

19.

Ferreira, R. L. M. 1999. Densidade de oviposição, e quantificação de larvas e pupas de Mansonia Blanchard, 1901 (Diptera: Culicidae), em Eichhornia crassipes Solms. e Pistia stratiotes Linn. na Ilha da Marchantaria, Amazonia central. Acta Amazon. 29: 123–123. Google Scholar

20.

Ferreira, R. L. M., E. S. Pereira, N. T. F. Har, and N. Hamada . 2003. Mansonia spp. (Diptera: Culicidae) associated with two species of macrophytes in a Varzea Lake, Amazonas, Brazil. Entomotropica. 18: 21–25. Google Scholar

21.

Forattini, O. P. 2002. Culicidologia médica: identificação, biologia e epidemiologia, vol 2. EDUSP, São Paulo, Brasil. Google Scholar

22.

Forattini, O. P., and E. Massad . 1998. Culicidae vectors and anthropic changes in a southern Brazil natural ecosystem. Ecosyst. Health Sust. 4: 9–19. Google Scholar

23.

Harbach, R. E. 2019. Mosquito taxonomic inventory.  http://mosquito-taxonomic-inventory.info/Google Scholar

24.

Hutchings, R. S. G., M. A. M. Sallum, R. L. M. Ferreira, and R. W. Hutchings . 2005. Mosquitoes of the Jaú National Park and their potential importance in Brazilian Amazonia. Med. Vet. Entomol. 19: 428–441. Google Scholar

25.

Hutchings, R. W., R. S. G. Hutchings, and M. A. M. Sallum . 2008. Distribuição de Culicidae na várzea, ao longo da calha dos Rios Solimões-Amazonas, pp. 133–152. In A. L. K. M. Albernaz, Conservação da várzea: Identificação e caracterização de regiões biogeográficas. Ibama/ProVárzea, Brasília, Brasil. Google Scholar

26.

Hutchings, R. S. G., R. W. H. Honegger, and M. A. M. Sallum . 2013. Culicidae (Diptera: culicomorpha) from the central Brazilian Amazon: Nhamundá and Abacaxis Rivers. Zoologia (Curitiba). 30: 1–14. Google Scholar

27.

Hutchings, R. S. G., R. W. Hutchings, I. S. Menezes, M. D. A. Motta, and M. A. M. Sallum . 2016. Mosquitoes (Diptera: culicidae) from the northwestern Brazilian Amazon: Padauari River. J. Med. Entomol. 53: 1330–1347. Google Scholar

28.

Hutchings, R. S. G., R. W. Hutchings, I. S. Menezes, and M. A. M. Sallum . 2020. Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) from the southwestern Brazilian Amazon: Liberdade and Gregório Rivers. J. Med. Entomol. 57: 1793–1811. Google Scholar

29.

Kengne, I. M., F. Brissaud, A. Akoa, R. A. Eteme, J. Nya, A. Ndikefor, and T. Fonkou . 2003. Mosquito development in a macrophyte-based wastewater treatment plant in Cameroon (Central Africa). Ecol. Eng. 21: 53–61. Google Scholar

30.

Lane, J. 1953. Neotropical Culicidae, vol. 2. University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. Google Scholar

31.

Latrubesse, E. M., J. C. Stevaux, and R. Sinha . 2005. Tropical rivers. Geomorphology. 70: 187–206. Google Scholar

32.

Laurence, B. R. 1960. The biology of two species of mosquito, Mansonia africana (Theobald) and Mansonia uniformis (Theobald), belonging to the subgenus Mansonioides (Diptera, Culicidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 51: 491–517. Google Scholar

33.

Luz, S. L. B., and R. Lourenço-de-Oliveira . 1996. Forest Culicinae mosquitoes in the environs of samuel hydroeletric plant, state of Rondônia. Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 91: 427–432. Google Scholar

34.

Navarro-Silva, M. A., A. A. Barbosa, and D. Calado . 2004. Atividade de Mansonia spp. (Mansoniini, Culicidae) em fragmento florestal na área urbana de Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil. Rev. Bras. de Zool. 21(2): 243–247. Google Scholar

35.

Quintero, O. L., B. D. Thatcher, and W. P. Tadei . 1996. Biologia de anofelinos amazônicos. XXL ocorrrência de espécies de Anopheles e outros culicídeos na área de influência da hidrelétrica de Balbina - Cinco anos após o enchimento do reservatório. Acta Amazon. 26: 281–295. Google Scholar

36.

R Core Team. 2020. R: a language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4. 0. 1) [Software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Google Scholar

37.

Rattanarithikul, R., B. A. Harrison, P. Panthusiri, E. L. Peyton, and R. E. Coleman . 2006. Illustrated keys to the mosquitoes of Thailand. III. Genera Aedeomyia, Ficalbia, Mimomyia, Hodgesia, Coquillettidia, Mansonia, and Uranotaenia. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health. 37: 1–10. Google Scholar

38.

Ronderos, R. A., and A. O. Bachmann . 1963. Mansoniini Neotropicales. I (Diptera: Culicidae). Rev. Soc. Entomol. Argent. 26: 57–65. Google Scholar

39.

Rueda, L. M. 2007. Global diversity of mosquitoes (Insecta: Diptera: Culicidae) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia. 595: 477–487. Google Scholar

40.

Tadei, W. P. 1996. O Gênero Mansonia (Diptera, Culicidae) e a proliferação de mosquitos na Usina Hidrelétrica de Tucuruí. Energia Amazônia. 1: 311–318. Google Scholar

41.

Tadei, W. P., and B. D. Thatcher . 2000. Anopheles do subgênero Nyssorhynchus, vetores da malária na Amazônia brasileira. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. São Paulo. 42: 87–94. Google Scholar

42.

Tadei, W. P., V. M. Scarpassa, and I. B. Rodrigues . 1991. Evolução das populações de Anopheles e Mansonia. na área de influência da usina Hidrelétrica de Tucuruí (Pará). Ciênc. Cult. 43: 639–640. Google Scholar

43.

Verdonschot, P. F., and A. A. Besse-Lototskaya . 2014. Flight distance of mosquitoes (Culicidae): a metadata analysis to support the management of barrier zones around rewetted and newly constructed wetlands. Limnologica. 45: 69–79. Google Scholar

44.

Wickham, H. 2011. ggplot2. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 3: 180–185. Google Scholar

45.

WRBU. Walter Reed Biosystem Uni. 2020. Systematic catalog of Culicidae  http://mosquitocatalog.org/default.aspx?pgID=2Google Scholar
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America.
Allan Kardec R. Galardo, Andréa V. Hijjar, Liliane Leite O. Falcão, Dario P. Carvalho, Kaio Augusto N. Ribeiro, Guilherme A. Silveira, Noel Fernandes S. Neto, and José F. Saraiva "Seasonality and Biting Behavior of Mansonia (Diptera, Culicidae) in Rural Settlements Near Porto Velho, State of Rondônia, Brazil," Journal of Medical Entomology 59(3), 883-890, (21 February 2022). https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjac016
Received: 26 September 2021; Accepted: 17 January 2022; Published: 21 February 2022
KEYWORDS
exophilic
mosquitoes
visiting behavior
Back to Top