Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2007 Genus Asiotmethis Uvarov (Orthoptera, Pamphagidae) from Turkey, with a checklist of known taxa
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Turkish taxa of Asiotmethis were studied. Asiotmethis limbatus limbatus (Charpentier, 1842), described from Turkey, is compared with Asiotmethis turritus armeniacus Ramme, 1951, known only in Armenia. The species described as Glyphotmethis arasi Salman, 1978 is proposed as junior synonym of Asiotmethis turritus armeniacus, the latter recorded for the first time from Turkey. A neotype is designated for A. limbatus limbatus from the European part of Turkey known as this taxon's type locality. Diagnosis, distribution, references to Turkey and doubtful records are given for both taxa, with a key, distributional map, illustrations and measurements. The need for a revision of the complicated genus Asiotmethis is explained, with some notes on problems of specific taxa. A checklist of all known species of the genus, their type localities and distributions is tabulated.

Introduction

The genus Asiotmethis was erected by Uvarov (1943), with Gryllus muricatus Pallas, 1771 as the type species. The currently known 24 species and subspecies of the genus are widely distributed in central and western Asia and southeastern Europe (Uvarov 1943, Bey-Bienko & Mistshenko 1951, Harz 1975, Presa & Garcia 1984). It is recorded from eastern Siberia, southern Russia, northwest China, Kazakstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, northern Tajikistan, northern Iran, Azerbaijan, Armenia, northern Turkey, southern Ukraine, northern Greece, Macedonia, Romania (Table 1). Most of the species were described from central Asia: 10 taxa in Kazakstan, 4 taxa in Russia, 2 taxa in Uzbekistan, 1 taxon in China. The remaining, two taxa from southern Ukraine and one taxon from each of southeastern Romania, northwestern Turkey, eastern Azerbaijan, Armenia and northern Iran, were described by six researchers (see Table 1).

Table 1.

Checklist of the taxa of Asiotmethis, with their type localities and distribution areas (see also references).

i1082-6467-16-2-191-t01.gif

A recent revisional study of the genus Glyphotmethis Bey-Bienko, 1951 (Ünal 2007), one of the genera most closely allied to Asiotmethis, has identified some problems and leads here to some comments on these insufficiently known taxa.

Thirteen taxa of Asiotmethis have gone unreported, other than in their original descriptions (Table 1).

The type locality of A. muricatus fasciatus (Fischer ,1846), described from eastern Siberia, is doubtful. According to Uvarov (1943) no Asiotmethis is recorded so far east and this species has not been located again since its original description.

Asiotmethis serricornis (Fischer, 1846) was described insufficiently from the eastern part of Kazakstan. Its exact type locality is unknown and no localities have been forthcoming since its original description. Subsequently eight other species have been described from eastern Kazakstan.

Asiotmethis muricatus lugubris (Herrich-Schaffer, 1838) was discovered from Siberia. Its type locality is uncertain and its characteristics very poorly stated. According to Uvarov (1943) the type locality of this taxon may lie anywhere east of the Ural Mountains. But three more new taxa have been described from that region (Table 1).

Steinmann (1966b) described the subspecies A. tauritus flavipes from east of central Kazakstan and compared it with A. tauritus tauritus Brunner von Wattenwyl as a nominotypical subspecies. But Brunner v. Wattenwyl did not describe any taxon named tauritus. And no such name appears in the family Pamphagidae, or even within Orthoptera. It may be thought that this name is a misspelling of the species Asiotmethis tauricus (Tarbinsky, 1930) or Asiotmethis turritus (Fischer, 1833). But the different authors and the distribution areas make such confusion unlikely. While the subspecies of A. tauricus are known from southern Ukraine and the subspecies of A. turritus are known from Transcaucasia, A. tauritus flavipes is found from Kazakstan. Therefore, this subspecies is not included in the species A. tauricus (Tarbinsky) or A. turritus (Fischer) with a correction of the name tauritus. It is also possible that flavipes may belong to another species found in central Asia (Table 1). The type material should be re-identified to establish its species.

Many species and subspecies, especially those found in central Asia are separated only by small morphological differences and some taxa share the same type locality, e.g., three taxa from Akmolinsk, three subspecies of heptapotamicus from Alatau-Almaty (Table 1). A similar situation can be seen in the genus Glyphotmethis in central Anatolia and in that instance some taxa have been synonymized (Ünal 2007).

The genus Asiotmethis should be revised, using not only museum material, but also new material to be collected from the type localities and the other distributional areas. A current checklist of the taxa of Asiotmethis is provided in the present paper with their type localities and distributional areas, in the hope it proves useful to further studies.

In Turkey only the species A. limbatus (Charpentier, 1842) has been recorded to date (Ünal 2003). It was described from the European part of Turkey (Thrace: the part west of the Bosporus and Marmara Sea) (Charpentier 1842, Uvarov 1943). Later, this species was recorded from Greece, Macedonia, Bulgaria and Romania (Uvarov 1943, Bey-Bienko & Mistshenko1951, Harz 1975, Willemse 1984). The population found in Romania was described by Ramme (1951) as a subspecies, A. limbatus motasi.

A. limbatus limbatus was mostly recorded from the European part of Turkey (Karabağ 1958, Karabağ et al. 1971, Demirsoy 1977); but two doubtful records were given from the Anatolian part. Karabağ et al. (1971) recorded one female from Akçakoca (in Düzce Province). But this species could not be found again by the author during several detailed field studies that took place in The other record given from Artova (in Tokat Province) upon one specimen (et al. 1999) needs confirmation. In the present study, while many specimens have been collected from the European part of Turkey, no single specimen has been found from the Anatolian part.

Type material of A. limbatus limbatus is lost (Harz 1975: 190). Therefore a neotype is designated from the European part of Turkey understood to be the type locality of this taxon.

Salman (1978) described Glyphotmethis arasi from Kağızman (in Kars province, E. Turkey). But it has been stated by the author that this species belongs to Asiotmethis (Ünal 2007). In the current paper it is determined that this species is synonymous with Asiotmethis turritus armeniacus Ramme 1951. Thus Asiotmethis turritus armeniacus is reported from Turkey for the first time.

My study is based on specimens newly collected from Turkey including from the type localities of A. limbatus limbatus and G. arasi and on the material preserved in Museums, including the type specimens of A. turritus armeniacus and G. arasi. Two taxa, A. limbatus limbatus and A. turritus armeniacus, respectively, one from the westernmost and the other from the easternmost regions of Turkey, are compared morphologically.

Materials and Methods

In this study, I examined 138 Asiotmethis specimens obtained during field studies and from collections. Field trips incorporating the type localities of A. limbatus and G. arasi, took place in 2001 and 2003 in Kars Province eastern Turkey, and in the european part of Turkey. Specimens were compared with material preserved in museums. Male penis valves and epiphallus are used to separate A. limbatus and A. turritus for the first time. A key for Turkish species is provided. Measurements are tabulated and were made using a ruler or a micrometer attached to a stereo microscope. The length of the pronotal prozona and metazona were measured along the midline. Illustrations and a distributional map are given. A checklist of current Asiotmethis taxa is prepared as a table. The following abbreviations are used in the text: N North; S South; W West; E East; AİBÜEM Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Entomoloji Müzesi, Bolu; AÜZM Ankara Üniversitesi Zooloji Müzesi, Ankara; NHM Natural History Museum, London; NMW Naturhistorisches Museum Wien; ZMB Zoologischen Museum Berlin.

Results

Asiotmethis Uvarov, 1943

Trans. R. Ent. Soc. Lond. 93: 52. Type species: Gryllus muricatus Pallas 1771.

Shumakov 1949; Ramme 1951: 109, 270, 410; Bey-Bienko & Mistshenko 1951: 304 (in translat. 1963: 323); Karabağ 1958: 110; Mirzayans 1959: 15; Dirsh 1961: 376; Shumakov 1963: 69; Weidner 1969: 154; Karabağ et al. 1971: 85; Harz 1975: 182; Demirsoy 1977: 36; Presa & Garcia 1984: 6; Otte 1994: 148; Mirzayans 1998: 12; Zhang et al. 2003: 219.

Diagnosis.— Body large with distinct tubercles and hairs. Prozona high with three distinct sharp lobes; metazona strongly lowered, with raised longitudinal median carina; hind margin acute angular. Tegmina macropterous in male, brachypterous or longer in female. Hind wing with a distinct large or small dark band, its apical and basal parts transparent, basal part yellowish, bluish or greenish in some species; axillary 1 and 2 veins distinctly curved. Inner side of hind legs various shades of red, blue, violet, orange or black. Dorsal margin of male mesotibia with distinct tubercles, without or less distinct in female. First abdominal tergite with a distinct, small, plate-like process dorsally. Tympanal organ well developed with a small tympanic lobe. Krauss organ large with distinct tubercles. Penis valves paired and divided; epiphallus plate-shaped, lophi with a group of spines, ancorae distinct.

Key to Turkish species of Asiotmethis

1. Metazona of pronotum short and narrow (Figs 1, 2; Table 2), less raised (Figs 3, 4); hindwing yellow at base, its dark band short, never attaining basal part (Figs 1, 2); inner side of hind legs orange or yellow; arolium small, reaching only to a half length of claws or less; apical part of penis valves slender, their tips very narrow (Figs 5, 6); posterior margin of epiphallus with a broadly rounded projection (Fig. 7)limbatus (Charpentier)

Metazona of pronotum long and broad (Figs 8, 9; Table 2), strongly raised (Figs 10, 11); hind wing light blue at base, its dark band very large, covering half of basal part (Figs 8, 9); inner side of hind legs red; arolium large, reaching beyond half length of claws; apical part of penis valves stout, their tips broad (Figs 12, 13); posterior margin of epiphallus with two rounded projections (Fig. 14)turritus (Fischer)

Figs 1–7.

Asiotmethis limbatus limbatus. 1. Male pronotum and wings from above. 2. Female pronotum and wings from above. 3. Male lateral view. 4. Female lateral view. 5. Apical valves of penis and cingulum, lateral view. 6. Ditto posterior view. 7. Epiphallus. Scales 1 mm.

i1082-6467-16-2-191-f01.jpg

Table 2.

Measurements of the Turkish Asiotmethis taxa (mm).

i1082-6467-16-2-191-t02.gif

Figs 8–14.

Asiotmethis turritus armeniacus. 8. Male pronotum and wings from above. 9. Female pronotum and wings from above. 10. Male lateral view. 11. Female lateral view. 12. Apical valves of penis and cingulum, lateral view. 13. Ditto posterior view. 14. Epiphallus. Scales 1 mm.

i1082-6467-16-2-191-f08.jpg

Asiotmethis limbatus (Charpentier, 1842)

Eremobia limbata: Charpentier 1842, pl. 24.

Asiotmethis limbatus limbatus (Charpentier, 1842) Figs 1–7, 15; Tables 1, 2

  • Eremobia limbata: Charpentier 1842; Saussure 1884: 226, 229.

  • Asiotmethis limbatus: Uvarov 1943: 55; Bey-Bienko & Mistshenko 1951: 306 (1963: 325); Karabağ 1958: 110; Weidner 1969: 154; Karabağ et al. 1971: 85; Demirsoy 1977: 37; Willemse 1984: 104, 220; Önder et al. 1999: 164.

  • Asiotmethis limbatus limbatus: Ramme 1951: 10; Harz 1975: 191; Presa & Garcia 1984: 6; Otte 1994: 148.

  • Type locality.— European part of Turkey: Kırklareli, Neotype.— male (AİBÜEM), here designated.

    Material examined.— TURKEY: Çanakkale, Gelibolu [Gallipoli], 10.8.1923, 1♂; Kırklareli, 23.6.1941, 1♂, 1♀, leg. T. Karabağ; Edirne, Keşan area, 1200 m, 6.7.1962, 1♂, 1♀, leg. K.M. Guichard & D.H. Harvey (NHM); Edirne, ormanları, 24.6.1969, 2♀♀; Kazankaya, 11.7.1961, 1♀ (AÜZM); Edirne, Meriç, İpsala yolu, Subaş Köyü, 12.6.2003, 9♂♂, 7♀♀; Edirne, Uzunköprü, Muhacirkadıköy, 12.6.2003, 6♂♂, 6♀ ♀, leg. M. Ünal & S. Mutun; Kırklareli, Yoğuntaş, Tekke Deresi, 41°45′068″ N, 27°07′518″ E, 11.6.2003, 27♂♂, 19♀♀, leg. M. Ünal (including neotype) (AİBÜEM); İstanbul, Silivri, Semizkum, 20.7.1966, 1♂, 3♀♀; Silivri, August 1964, 1♀, leg. O. Karabağ; Kırklareli, 23.6.1942, 1♀, leg. T. Karabağ (AÜZM); GREECE: Kavalla, sea level, 1♂ (leg. A. Buxton); Kavalla, 7.7.1985, 2♂♂, 1♀ (NHM); Drama, 300 m, 5.7.1982, 1♀ (leg. F. Willemse & J. & W. Faassen; det. F. Willemse) (AİBÜEM); MACEDONIA: Vratnica (N of Tetovo), 700 m, 23.7.1972, 1♂ (leg. et det. F. Willemse) (AİBÜEM); BULGARIA: 6.1929, 3♀♀; 7.1929, 1♂; Borusowgrad, 20.6.1930, 1♂, 1♀ (leg. P. Tchovbadjiev) (NHM).

    Distribution.— (Fig. 15). Southeastern Balkan Peninsula, southern Bulgaria, Macedonia, northern Greece, Thrace, european part of Turkey: Kırklareli, Edirne, Çanakkale, İstanbul, Tekirdağ.

    Fig. 15.

    Distributions of A. limbatus limbatus and A. turritus armeniacus.

    i1082-6467-16-2-191-f15.gif

    Diagnosis.— Prozona short and high, its lobes distinct, incision between lobes deep (Figs 3, 4); lateral projections of mesozona distinct; metazona long, median carina clear, distinctly raised; lateral margins straight, acute angular at hind margin (Figs 1, 2); male tegmina long, reaching far beyond hind knee (Figs 1, 3); hind wing yellow at base, with a short dark band in anterior margin (Figs 1, 2); inner side of hind femur yellow or orange with a dark-blue macula at base; inner side of hind tibia yellow or orange; female tegmina reaching to end of abdomen or to genicular lobes of hind femur, shorter in some specimens, reaching to 6th to 7th abdominal tergites (Figs 2, 4); arolium short, reaching at most to half extent of claws; penis valves slender, their apices very narrow (Figs 5, 6); epiphallus with a broadly rounded projection in posterior margin (Fig. 7). This subspecies is separated from A. turritus armeniacus by the characters given in the key and by distribution (Fig. 15).

    Remarks.— The type material of this taxon is lost (Harz 1975: 190). A male neotype is here designated from among a rich sample of material collected from Kırklareli Province: Yoğuntaş in the european part of Turkey.

    The specimens given as Glyphotmethis sp. from Edirne: Süloğlu (Karabağ et al. 1971) and given as Glyphotmethis escherichi from the same place (Karabağ et al. 1974), belong to this subspecies. No Glyphotmethis have been found from that region.

    This taxon is found in Thrace. But there are two doubtful records from the Anatolian part of Turkey (Fig. 15). One female collected from Düzce: Akçakoca (Karabağ et al. 1971) is lost. No specimen has been discovered in recent field studies in Akçakoca. One specimen recorded from Tokat: Artova (Önder et al. 1999) requires confirmation. This latter record may belong to Glyphotmethis.

    Asiotmethis turritus (Fischer de Waldheim, 1833)

    Thrinchus turritus: Fischer de Waldheim 1833, Bull. Soc. Imp. Nat. Moscou 6: 370.

    Asiotmethis turritus armeniacus Ramme, 1951 Figs 8–15; Tables 1, 2

  • Asiotmethis turritus armeniacus: Ramme 1951: 410; Presa & Garcia 1984: 7; Stolyarov 1997: 69.

  • Glyphotmethis arasi: Salman 1978: 64. syn. n.

  • Glyphotmethis arasi: Demirsoy 1977: 47; Demirsoy 1979: 268. syn. n.

  • Glyphotmethis turritus armeniacus: Otte 1994: 159.

  • Asiotmethis arasi: Ünal 2007: 3.

  • Type locality.—Armenia: Yerevan. Holotype.- male (ZMB).

    Material examined.— ARMENIA: Eriwan [Yerevan], 14.8.1924, 4 ♂ ♂, 2♀ ♀ (holo- and paratypes of A. turritus armeniacus) (ZMB); Eriwan, 1♂, leg. W. Ramme (paratype of A. turritus armeniacus); Yerevan, 30.6.1934, 2♂ ♂, 27.7.1934, 1♀; Kotaik, 1♂, 1♀; Ejmiadzin, 8.6.1926, 2♂ ♂; Armenia, 31.6.1924, 1♂, 1♀, 8.6.1926, 1♂, 17.8.1926, 1♀, leg. A. Schelkovnikov (NHM); TURKEY: Kars, Kağızman, Deller çiftliği, 1250 m, 16.7.1974, 2♂ ♂, 1♀, leg. S. Salman (holo- and paratypes of G. arasi) (NHM); Kars, Kağızman, Aras Vadisi, Deller çiftliği, 1250–1360 m, 26.7.2001, 1♀; Kağ ızman, Aras Vadisi, Karakurt Köyü, 26–27.6.2003, 12♂ ♂, 4♀, leg. M. Ünal & S. Mutun (AİBÜEM).

    Distribution.— (Fig. 15). Armenia: Yerevan, Ejmiadzin, Kotaik; New for Turkey: Kars.

    Diagnosis.— Prozona low, its lobes distinct (Figs 10, 11); lateral projections of mesozona slightly distinct; metazona very long, median carina distinct, strongly raised, almost to level of prozona, lateral margins slightly concave, hind margin slightly rounded (Figs 8, 9); male tegmina long, reaching far beyond hind knees (Figs 8, 10); hind wing light bluish at base with large dark band covering almost half of wing's basal region (Figs 8, 9); inner side of hind femur red with a long, dark-blue macula at base; inner side of hind tibia bright red; female tegmina covering abdominal tergites from above (Figs 9, 11), shorter in some specimens, attaining 5th to 6th abdominal tergites; arolium large, reaching beyond half of claw length; penis valves stout, their apices broad (Figs 12, 13); epiphallus with two rounded projections on posterior margin (Fig. 14). This subspecies is separated from A. limbatus limbatus by the characters given in the key and by its distribution (Fig. 15).

    Remarks.Glyphotmethis arasi Salman, 1978 was collected from its type locality, Kars, Kağızman, Aras Valley. These specimens were compared with the type materials of both G. arasi and A. turritus armeniacus in the NHM and ZMB. As a result G. arasi is proposed as a junior synonym of A. turritus armeniacus, and thus this taxon is added to the Turkish fauna for the first time.

    Acknowledgments

    I would like to thank Serap Mutun (Abant İzzet Baysal University, Bolu) for helping me with collecting; appreciation to Erkut Kıvanç (AÜZM, Ankara); to George Beccaloni and Judith Marshall (NHM, London); to the late Alfred Kaltenbach and Ulrike Aspöck (NMW, Wien); to Michael Ohl, and Isolde Dorandt (ZMB, Berlin) for their assistance during my studies in the Museums; thanks also to Fer Willemse (Eygelshoven) for sending me two specimens of A. limbatus collected from Greece and Macedonia; to Dao-Chuan Zhang (Hebei University, China) for data on the current position of A. bifurcatus in China; to Glenn K. Morris (University of Toronto, Mississauga) and anonymous reviewers for corrections and very valuable suggestions on the manuscript. The field studies in Turkey were supported by the Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK: TBAG-1981-100T089). My studies in the European Museums were supported by the European Commission's Research Infrastructure Action via the following SYNTHESYS Projects: GB-TAF-561, AT-TAF-562, DE-TAF-558.

    References

    1. G. Y. Bey-Bienko and L. L. Mistshenko . 1951. Fauna of the U.S.S.R. Locusts and Grasshoppers of the U.S.S.R. and Adjacent Countries. Part 1. Zoological Institute of the U.S.S.R. Academy of Sciences, no. 38. pp. Google Scholar

    2. C. Brunner von Wattenwyl 1882. Prodromus der europäischen Orthopteren Leipzig. pp. Google Scholar

    3. T. Charpentier 1842. Orthoptera descripta et decipta. Leop. Voss., Leipzig, pl. 24. pp. Google Scholar

    4. M. E. Chernyakovskii and N. V. Ravina . 1997. Fauna and Ecological distribution of Locusts (Orthoptera, Acrididae) in high Mountains of Daghestan. Entomological Review 77:241–247. Google Scholar

    5. A. Demirsoy 1977. Türkiye Caelifera (Insecta, Orthoptera) faunasının tesbiti ve taksonomik incelenmesi (1). Atatürk ünviversitesi, Fen Fakültesi yayınları, no: 80. pp. Google Scholar

    6. A. Demirsoy 1979. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Caeliferafauna Anatoliens: Neu Arten, Unterarten und Synonyme sowie für dei Türkei neu festgestellte Arten. Entomologische Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum Hamburg 6:267–285. Google Scholar

    7. V. M. Dirsh 1961. A Preliminary Revision of the Families and Subfamilies of Acridoidea (Orthoptera, Insecta). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Entomology 10:351–419. Google Scholar

    8. D. C. Eades, D. Otte, and P. Naskrecki . 2006. Orthoptera Species File Online, Version 2.  http://osf2x.orthoptera.orgGoogle Scholar

    9. K. Harz 1975. The Orthoptera of Europa (Die Orthopteren Europas). Vol 2.Dr. W. Junk. The Hague. pp. Google Scholar

    10. S. Ingrisch and D. Pavicevic . 1985. Zur Faunistik, Systematik und ökologischen Valenz der Orthopteren von Nordost-Griechenland. Mitteilungen der Münchner Entomologischen Gesellschaft 75:45–77. Google Scholar

    11. A. Kaltenbach 1965. Dictyoptera und Orthoptera von Nordost-Griechenland und der Insel Thasos. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien 68:465–484. Google Scholar

    12. T. Karabağ 1958. Türkiye'nin Orthoptera faunası, Türkiye Orthoptera'larının sinonim ve yayılışlarınıgösterir katalog (A Synonymic and Distributional Catalogue of Turkish Orthoptera). Ankara ünviversitesi, Fen Fakültesi yayınları, no: 81. pp. Google Scholar

    13. T. Karabağ, İ Gümüşsuyu, S. Balamir, and E. Tutkun . 1971. Türkiye Orthoptera Faunası'n ı n Tesbiti üzerinde Araştırmalar. Bitki Koruma Bülteni 11:73–98. Google Scholar

    14. T. Karabağ, İ Gümüşsuyu, S. Balamir, and E. Tutkun . 1974. Türkiye Orthoptera Faunası'nın Tesbiti üzerinde Araştırmalar. Bitki Koruma Bülteni 14:2–18. Google Scholar

    15. W. F. Kirby 1910. A Synonymic Catalogue of the Orthoptera. Vol. 3.Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History). London. pp. Google Scholar

    16. H. Mirzayans 1959. Liste des Orthopteres et leurs distribution en Iran. Entomol. Phytopath. Appl 18:10–30. Google Scholar

    17. H. Mirzayans 1998. The list of Orthoptera in the insect collection of Plant pest and diseases research institute of Iran 1, Pamphagidae and Pyrgomorphidae. Insect Taxon. Res. Dept. Publ 3:1–40. Google Scholar

    18. L. L. Mistshenko 1972. Orthoptera (Saltatoria). pp 16–116. In G. Bey-Bienko, et al , editor. (eds). Insects and ticks injurious to agriculture. Akademia Nauk SSSR. Leningrad. Google Scholar

    19. D. Otte 1994. Orthoptera Species File 3. Grasshoppers [Acridomorpha] B. Pamphagoidea Orthopterists' Society & Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. pp. Google Scholar

    20. F. Önder, E. Pehlivan, Y. Karsavuran, S. Tezcan, and Ş Kısmalı . 1999. Catalogue of Collection of Pamphagidae, Pyrgomorphidae, Catantopidae and Acrididae (Orthoptera) preserved in the Prof. Dr. Niyazi Lodos Museum, İzmir, Turkey. Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi 23:163–178. Google Scholar

    21. J. J. Presa and M. D. Garcia . 1984. Inventario preliminar de los “Pamphagidae” (Orthoptera) de la region paleartica. Publicado en Annales de la Universidad de Murcia 42:3–42. Google Scholar

    22. W. Ramme 1951. Zur Systematik Faunistik und Biologie der Orthopteren von Südost Europa und Vorderasien. Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin 27:1–431. Google Scholar

    23. S. Salman 1978. Ağrı, Kars ve Artvin illerinin Orthoptera (Insecta) faunası üzerine taksonomik araştırmalar Atatürk üniversitesi, Fen Fakültesi yayınları, no. 82. pp. Google Scholar

    24. H. Saussure 1884. Prodromus Oedipodiorum, Insectorum ex Ordine Orthopterorum. Mémoires de la Société de Physique et d'Histoire Naturelle Genève 28:1–256. Google Scholar

    25. E. M. Shumakov 1949. Species and subspecies of the genus Asiotmethis Uv. (Orthoptera, Acrididae) and their geographical distribution. Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 30:321–325. Google Scholar

    26. E. M. Shumakov 1963. Acridoidea of Afghanistan and Iran. Horae Societatis Entomologicae Unionis Soveticae 49:3–248. Google Scholar

    27. H. Steinmann 1966a. A New Asiotmethis Uv. (Orthoptera, Pamphaginae) from Central Asia. Annales Historico-Naturales Musei Nationalis Hungarici 58:281–283. Google Scholar

    28. H. Steinmann 1966b. Asiotmethis tauritus flavipes ssp.n. (Orth., Pamphaginae) from Kasahstan. Folia Entomologica Hungarica 19:143–147. Google Scholar

    29. M. V. Stolyarov 1997. Peculiarities of the Genesis of the Orthopteran Fauna in Transcaucasia: 5. Endemism and Some General Peculiarities of the Genesis of the Fauna in this Region. Entomological Review 77:66–74. Google Scholar

    30. Systax 2003 Taxonomic database.  http://www.biologie.uni-ulm.de/systaxGoogle Scholar

    31. B. P. Uvarov 1925. Notes on the Acrididae (Orthoptera) of Central Asia, with descriptions of new species and races. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 30:260–272. Google Scholar

    32. B. P. Uvarov 1926. A preliminary key to the Central-Asiatic species of the genus Tmethis Fieb. (Orth. Acrid.). Konowia 5:179–185. Google Scholar

    33. B. P. Uvarov 1943. The tribe Thrinchini of the subfamily Pamphaginae, and the interrelations of the Acridid subfamilies (Orthoptera). Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 93:1–72. Google Scholar

    34. M. Ünal 2003. Checklist of the Turkish Orthoptera.  http://www.members.tripod.com/Cesa88/orthtr.htmGoogle Scholar

    35. M. Ünal 2007. Revision of the genus Glyphotmethis (Orthoptera: Pamphagidae). Zootaxa 1581:1–36. Google Scholar

    36. H. Weidner 1969. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Feldheuschrecken (Caelifera) Anatoliens. Entomologische Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum Hamburg 66:145–226. Google Scholar

    37. F. Willemse 1984. Catalogue of the Orthoptera of Greece Fauna Greciae. pp. Google Scholar

    38. F. Willemse 1985. Supplementary Notes on the Orthoptera of Greece Fauna Greciae. pp. Google Scholar

    39. D. C. Zhang, H. Yin, and X. C. Yin . 2003. On the taxonomic system of Eurasian Pamphagidae (Orthoptera: Caelifera). Acta Entomologica Sinica 46:218–221. Google Scholar

    Mustafa Ünal "Genus Asiotmethis Uvarov (Orthoptera, Pamphagidae) from Turkey, with a checklist of known taxa," Journal of Orthoptera Research 16(2), (1 December 2007). https://doi.org/10.1665/1082-6467(2007)16[191:GAUOPF]2.0.CO;2
    Accepted: 1 September 2007; Published: 1 December 2007
    JOURNAL ARTICLE
    7 PAGES


    SHARE
    ARTICLE IMPACT
    Back to Top