Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2008 The genus Aleuas (Acrididae, Copiocerinae, Aleuasini)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

A revision of the genus Aleuas is made, and the genus is redefined. Four known species are redescribed on the basis of the examination of their types and of newly collected specimens. Four new species are described from materials collected by the author or found in the collections of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia and the Museu Nacional of Rio de Janeiro. All species of the genus live in the southern part of S. America, east of the Andes. The genus Zygoclistron is closely related, and together with Aleuas, these genera constitute the tribe Aleuasini of the Acrididae Copiocerinae. The position of the Aleuasini within the Copiocerinae has been recently contested on the basis of certain anatomical and cytological evidence.

Introduction

The genus Aleuas includes a few species found in the southern part of South America. Its species are very distinctive: they cannot be mistaken for those of any other South American genus. Together with the genus Zygoclistron, they constitute the tribe Aleuasini of the Copiocerinae, as defined by Amedegnato (1974). The general aspect of Aleuas species is different from those of Zygoclistron, mainly because of the green or yellowish color and rather smooth integument of most species; those of Zygoclistron being mostly brown to straw-yellow, and their integument rugose. Also the color-pattern of the species of Zygoclistron is very different from that of the species of Aleuas.

For the making of the present revision, the types of all the described species were examined and compared with specimens recently collected. Among the latter, representatives of four undescribed species were found.

Index to specific names

Five species were described in the genus Aleuas from 1878 to 1911. One of these (A. brachypterus Bruner 1906) was later found to be the same as A. vitticollis Stål 1878 (Rehn 1913: 338; this work). To these four valid species we add now four new ones (A. albinae, A. paraguayensis, A. paranensis and A. uruguayensis). The genus as known at present is rather small, containing only the following eight species:

  • A. albinae n. sp.

  • A. brachypterus Bruner 1906 (= A. vitticollis Stål 1878)

  • A. curtipennis Bruner 1911

  • A. gracilis Stål 1878.

  • A. lineatus Stål 1878.

  • A. paraguayensis n. sp.

  • A. paranensis n. sp.

  • A. uruguayensis n. sp.

  • A. vitticollis Stål 1878.

  • Materials and methods

    Materials.— Most of the specimens used for this work have been collected by the author. Others were borrowed from the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia and the Museu Nacional de Rio de Janeiro. All existing types of the species previously described have been studied and photographed and some have been compared with specimens in the collection in Montevideo. Methods employed were those usual in taxonomic studies:

    Genitalia.— For some of the types and many other specimens these have been dissected, cleaned in a solution of KOH and preserved in glycerin. Details of the cleaning and preparation of genitalia are recorded in Carbonell 2004: 64.

    Measurements.— Measures were taken with a sliding stage, its displacement registered by an attached dial caliper. Accuracy is in the range of 1/10 of a millimeter. These measurements are indicated in Fig. 36.

    Colors.— Colors named (number designation in parens) according to the nomenclature given in Smithe (1975), have been used to compare to the colors of the specimens. These names are given as a general indication since tones and hues may vary in different specimens of the same species.

    Genus ALEUAS Stål 1878 Figs 1, 37

    Fig. 1.

    Genera Aleuas and Zygoclistron, differences most visible on head and pronotum indicated by arrows. A. Head frontal. B. Transverse section of metazona. A. vitticollis, male, from Argentina, Corrientes, Arroyo San Joaquin. Zygoclistron trachystictum, male, from Paraguay, Dept. Caaguazú, near Ihú. Scale line 5 mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f01.gif

    Etymology.—The derivation is probably Alevas or Aleuas, the name of a tyrant in ancient Thessaly.

    Size.—Among the specimens measured for this work, the largest male belongs to A. vitticollis, with a total length of 35.8 mm, the smallest to A. curtipennis (22 mm); among the females, the largest is A. albinae (60 mm) and the smallest A curtipennis (32.1 mm). See Tables 1 to 8.

    Caryology.—The species of Aleuas whose caryology have been studied have the following chromosomic formulae (Mesa et al. 1982:520):

  • A. gracilis, males 2n= 20, XY; females 2n=20, XX.

  • A. lineatus, males 2n=20, XY; females 2n=20, XX.

  • A. vitticollis, males 2n=20, XY; females 2n=20, XX

  • A. albinae (as n. sp. N° 1) males 2n, 20, XY; females 2n=20, XX.

  • A. paraguayensis (as n. sp. N° 2) males 2n=22; XY, females 2n=22, XX

  • A. paranensis (as n. sp. N° 3) males 2n=20, XY; females 2n=20, XX

  • Note that the only species with 2n=22 is A. paraguayensis, all the others having 2n=20.

    Origin.—The center of origin of the genus seems to be that part of southern S. America that includes northern and central Argentina, East Paraguay and the Brazilian states of Mato Grosso and Mato Grosso do Sul. In this area occurs the largest number of species of the genus.

    Distribution.— (Fig. 37). According to the data in the literature and by my own observations, the species of Aleuas have been found in southern South America east of the Andes, between parallels 14° 25′S (Diamantino, in State of Mato Grosso, Brasil,) and the province of Chubut in Argentina (approx. 44°S). Within this large territory, the concrete localities from which specimens of these insects have been available for this study or are mentioned in the literature, allow me to indicate the following geographical areas where species of this genus might be present. Those marked with an asterisk (*) are the ones where the species have been actually found:

  • Brasil: southern parts of Mato Grosso* and Goias*; the entire states of Mato Grosso do Sul*, Minas Gerais*, Sao Paulo, Parana, Santa Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul*.

  • Bolivia: Prov. Gutierrez* (ex Prov. Sara) of the Dept. of Santa Cruz.

  • Paraguay: eastern part*, probably whole country.

  • Uruguay: whole country*.

  • Argentina: Provinces of: Formosa*, Chaco*, Misiones*, Santiago del Estero, San Juan*, Santa Fe*, Corrientes*, Catamarca, La Rioja, Tucumán*, Mendoza*, San Luis, Córdoba*, Entre Rios*, La Pampa*, Buenos Aires*, Neuquén, Río Negro* and Chubut*.

  • Habitat.— There are few observations on the habitat of these species, which are found mostly in grasslands and other rather open plant formations. In the complex of acridoid species that is found in the mentioned area, the species of Aleuas are neither common nor abundant. On the map of Cabrera and Willink (1973) of the Botanical Provinces of South America it can be seen that the area occupied by this genus, as defined above, includes parts of the provinces of Cerrado, Paranense, Chaqueña, Espinal, Pampeana, Monte and Patagonica. All these biogeographical provinces have open areas covered with grasses and other herbaceous plants where the species of this genus are found. Some, as the Pampeana, are mostly grassland. Ronderos et al. (1981: 74) mention A. lineatus and A. vitticollis as belonging to the grassland acridid fauna; Sanchez says likewise (1981: 228–9), but also states that neither was numerically abundant in that plant formation.

    Food-plants.—My own observations indicate that A. lineatus feeds on grasses (Gramineae or Poaceae) and probably also on Cyperaceae. A. vitticollis and A. albinae live in dense associations of grasses (see below) where they probably do not have ready access to plants of other families. COPR (1982: 181) states that A. lineatus feeds on natural grasses, lucerne or alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and also on other (undetermined) cultivated plants. Gangwere and Ronderos (1975: 178), with reference to A. lineatus and A. vitticollis, state that their mandibles are of the graminivorous type, that their feces contain mostly residues of grasses, and that they are unselectively polyphagous. Liebermann (1948: 88, 1950: 10, 1967: 109), Sanchez and De Wysiecki (1993: 31), mention that A. lineatus is frequently found in cultures of alfalfa, but also on prairie dominated by Stipa brachychaeta, and on millet (Panicum miliaceum). I have no data on the food of other species, but the fact that they generally live on grasslands may point to similar feeding habits.

    Pathology.— All data on this subject refer to A. lineatus. Luna et al. (1981: 245) say that it is susceptible to infection with Nosema locustae (Microsporida, Nosematidae). Lange and De Wysieki (1996:27) did not find infection with that pathogen in one population of this species. Lange (1992) did not find specimens attacked by Perezia diochroplusiae (Microspora, Pereziidae) or Nosema locustae in Prov. of Buenos Aires. The same author (1996: 108) discovered that A. lineatus is apparently resistant to the fungus Entomophaga grylli, that attacks other grasshoppers.

    Taxonomy.— Most of the morphological characters of the species of this genus can be seen in the corresponding illustrations. Only a few of these features that are considered generically important will be mentioned here. Integument smooth on head, abdomen and legs; from impresso punctate to slightly rugose on pronotum. Head globose, slightly opisthognathous; antennae filiform; fastigium very short and blunt in some species, angular in others, always shorter than the width of interocular space. Pronotum: prozona longer than metazona in most known species, equal to it in A. albinae; median dorsal carina from slightly elevated to almost obsolete, lateral carinae absent; anterior margin evenly rounded to almost straight, posterior margin either rounded or slightly angulate in different species; prosternal tubercle spiniform, slightly retrorse. Tegmina and wings from well-developed and reaching or surpassing end of abdomen, to reduced to a variable extent, this more frequently in females than in males.

    Fore and middle legs without particularities, the hind with carinae well-marked, smooth; hind tibiae with 7 to 9 external spines (exceptionally 6 or 10) and 8 to 10 internal ones (exceptionally 12); some in the apical part modified, as a part of the stridulatory apparatus. Intermesosternal space closed or very narrowly open in males, open in females; intermetasternal space closed in males, open in females. General coloration green in some species, light brown in others; some species having green and brown forms.

    Stridulatory mechanism. (Fig. 35) This apparatus and the sounds produced are described in detail by Lorier et al. (2002). It consists of modified spines on the internal side of the distal end of the hind tibiae, which are almost parallel to the tibial axis, and modified cross veins on the radial area of the tegmen, elevated over its general surface. Stridulation is produced by rapid movements of the hind tibia that run its modified apical spines over the said veinlets. The sounds produced are not very loud. Species of Zygoclistron have the same type of stridulating apparatus, but it is worth mentioning that, while the raised crossveins on the tegmina are very conspicuous, in that genus there are no modified spines on the hind tibiae; the normal spines seem to effect that function. A. curtipennis and A. uruguayensis lack the stridulatory mechanism.

    Key to species of the genus Aleuas.

    Males

    1 Cerci strongly incurved, apices spatulate2

    1′ Cerci slightly incurved or straight, apices acute3

    2 Large (Table 1), abdominal terminalia as in Fig. 25BA. albinae

    2′ Small (Table 4), abdominal terminalia as in Fig. 25AA. lineatus

    3 With lines of contrasting color along sides of pronotal disk4

    3′ With lines of contrasting color along sides of pronotal disk and median carina5

    4 Lines red, on prozona onlyA. paraguayensis

    4′ Lines black, on pro- and metazona6

    5 Fastigium in dorsal view with sides rounded, forming an obtuse angleA. vitticollis

    5′ Fastigium in dorsal view with sides forming an acute angleA. gracilis

    6 Short-winged, fastigium in dorsal view with sides carinated, its surface excavated, without median carinaA. curtipennis

    6′ Short-winged, fastigium in dorsal view with sides rounded, forming a right angle, median carina marked only at its apexA. paranensis

    6″ Long-winged, fastigium in dorsal view with sides converging in an acute angle, median carina well-marked on fastigium and vertexA. uruguayensis

    Females

    1 Pronotal disk with lines of contrasting color along sides only2

    1′ Pronotal disk with lines of contrasting color along sides and median carina4

    1″ Without the above lines on pronotal disk6

    2 Lines red, marked on prozona onlyA. paraguayensis

    2′ Lines black, marked on pro- and metazona3

    3 Large (Table 1), hind tibiae and tarsi vinaceousA. albinae

    3′. Smaller (Table 4), hind tibiae and tarsi greenA. lineatus

    4 Fastigium in dorsal view with sides converging in an obtuse angle, general color green or pale cinnamon, most specimens short-winged, rarely long-wingedA. vitticollis

    4′ Fastigium in dorsal view with sides converging in a right or slightly acute angle5

    5 Inner pagina of hind femur light-colored, with a barely marked dark line along region of pinnae (Fig. 24)A. gracilis

    5′ Internal pagina of hind femur mostly black (Fig. 23)A. paranensis

    6. Fastigium in dorsal view with sides converging in a right angle, median carina marked on fastigium and vertexA. uruguayensis

    6′. Fastigium with sides converging in an obtuse angle, its surface excavated, without median carina, inner pagina of hind femur partially marked with black (Fig. 23)A. curtipennis

    Aleuas albinae n.sp. Figs 2, 3, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25B, 27, 37. Table 1

    Fig. 2.

    Aleuas albinae n. sp. habitus. Male from Uruguay, Dept. Florida, Casupá. Length 41.8 mm. Scale line 5 mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f02.gif

    Fig. 3.

    Aleuas albinae n. sp. habitus. Female from Uruguay, Dept. Florida, Casupá. Length 60.2 mm. Scale line 5 mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f03.gif

    Etymology.— Specific name dedicated to my wife Albina, without whose help much of my work could not have been done.

    Taxonomy.— One of the largest species (Table 1). Fastigium in dorsal view projected forwards in a very obtuse angle; frontal margin of pronotum almost straight, slightly curved; sides of posterior margin in an almost right angle (Fig. 22); median carina of pronotum very slightly marked. Male cerci strongly incurved, with spatulate apices (Fig. 25), a character shared within the genus only with A. lineatus, but found in most species of Zygoclistron. Furculae of the 10th abdominal segment of males absent in this species (and in A. lineatus), though present in all the other species (Figs 25, 26). Stridulatory mechanism with three modified spines on hind tibiae in both sexes (as in A. paraguayensis, Fig. 35). Phallic complex (Fig. 27): characteristic are the massive apical valves of the endophallus.

    Chromatic characters.— General coloration light apple-green (61). Dusky-brown (19) lateral postocular bands continued on sides of pronotal disk; a white (slightly yellowish) band immediately below it on prozonal lateral lobes, that disappears on metazona; lower margins of lateral lobes narrowly fringed with white. Fore and middle legs light cinnamon; hind femora apple-green (61) with upper surface yellow in females, black markings on internal side (female) as shown in Fig. 23. Hind tibiae and tarsi vinaceous (4).

    Affinities.—This species seems very closely related to A. lineatus, from which, however, it can be readily separated by its much larger size and other characters as indicated in the respective descriptions and in the keys.

    Habitat.— The habitat of this species is the same as described below for A. vitticollis. Like the latter species, it is nocturnal and, being far less common, it is almost impossible to find specimens in the daytime. Unlike A. vitticollis, all specimens, male and female, are long-winged; we have never found a short-winged individual.

    Known distribution.— (Fig. 37). Uruguay: probably most of the country. The nocturnal habits of this species, its restricted habitat and the fact of its being rather scarce, make its presence probable in areas of Argentina and Brasil where it has not been found to date.

    Aleuas curtipennis Bruner 1911 Figs 4, 5, 20, 21, 22, 23, 26D, 28, 37, Table 2

    Fig. 4.

    Aleuas curtipennis Bruner 1911, habitus. Male from Brazil, Mato Grosso, Chapada dos Guimaraes. Length 22.5 mm. Scale line 5 mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f04.gif

    Fig. 5.

    Aleuas curtipennis Bruner 1911, habitus. Female from Brazil, Mato Grosso, Chapada dos Guimaraes. Length 32 mm. Scale line 5 mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f05.gif

    Etymology.— Latin, curtus, short and penna, wing or feather.

    Taxonomy.— A small-sized species (Table 2). Fastigium in dorsal view projected forwards in an obtuse angle; pronotum with tegument rugose, anterior margin evenly curved, posterior with sides in an obtuse angle (females) or an almost right angle (males), median dorsal carina marked, more prominent in females than in males (Figs 21, 22). Both sexes short-winged, tegmina reaching to about middle of abdomen. End of abdomen in males (Fig. 26): furculae prominent, triangular, divergent; epiproct with an acute caudal projection; cerci conical, short, slightly incurved, not surpassing end of epiproct. Without stridulatory mechanism. Phallic complex (Fig. 28): apical valves of archendophallus in dorsal view mark the most important difference with other species.

    Chromatic characters.— General coloration from raw-umber (23) on its darker parts, to buff (24) on lighter ones. Antennal segments mostly fuscous (21), narrowly banded with buff (124) at their apices: area of contact of metathoracic epimeron-episternum black; tegmina with buff (124) veins over a much darker (brown) membrane. All legs mostly buff (124), hind tibiae carmine (8). Inner side of hind femora in females widely marked with black (Fig. 23).

    Affinities.— This seems most closely related to A. uruguayensis, these two species lacking the stridulatory mechanism present in all the other species.

    Habitat.— Low places with herbaceous vegetation and shrubs.

    Known distribution.— Brasil: Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul and Goias. For what we know of the distribution of the species of Aleuas, this is the northernmost, being recorded between parallels lat 14° 24′S (Diamantino, Mato Grosso) and lat 19° 01′S (Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul) (Fig. 37).

    Aleuas gracilis Stål 1878 Figs 6, 7, 20, 21, 22, 24, 26B, 29, 37, Table 3

    Fig. 6.

    Aleuas gracilis Stål 1878, habitus. Male from Brazil, Minas Gerais, between Uberaba and Araxa. Length 32 mm. Scale line 5 mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f06.gif

    Fig. 7.

    Aleuas gracilis Stål 1878, habitus. Female from Paraguay, Dept. Paraguarí, Sapucay. Length 44.9 mm. Scale line 5 mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f07.gif

    Etymology.— Latin, gracilis, slim, slender.

    Taxonomy.— Males small-sized, females considerably larger (Table 3). Fastigium in dorsal view projecting forwards, its sides forming a right angle (slightly acute in some specimens). Disk of pronotum with anterior margin curved, posterior one with sides in an obtuse angle, apex rounded; median dorsal carina well-marked, somewhat prominent in females. Tegmina reaching almost end of second abdominal segment in females, nearly apex of abdomen in males; end of male abdomen (Fig. 26): furculae placed close together, their inner margins contiguous; epiproct triangular, acutely pointed; cerci conical, very slightly incurved, not surpassing end of epiproct. Stridulatory mechanism with two modified pre-apical spines on hind tibiae in males and females. The latter have abbreviated tegmina lacking the corresponding stridulatory crossveins; this might mean that there are also long-winged females, as in the case of A. vitticollis, where the stridulatory apparatus may be functional. Phallic complex (Fig. 29): apical valves of endophallus arch in dorsal and lateral views are characteristic.

    Chromatic characters.— General color of body and legs light tawny (38). Postocular bands chestnut (32), continued on upper parts of lateral lobes of pronotum and on tegmina; in females a narrow median band of same color along median dorsal carina of pronotum, continued on terga of metanotum and first abdominal segment; caudal margins of abdominal segments narrowly margined with same color. Tegmina of males very pale apple-green (61) on area above R veins (cubital and vannal areas). Inner pagina of hind femora in females narrowly marked with black, this mark much wider and darker in males; hind tarsi in both sexes superiorly red, this color also on apices of hind tibiae.

    Affinities.— Seems closely related to A. vitticollis.

    Habitat.— Grassland with shrubs.

    Known distribution.— Brasil: Mato Grosso do Sul. Paraguay: eastern part (Fig. 37).

    Aleuas lineatus Stål 1878 Figs 8, 9, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25A, 30, 37. Table 4

    Fig. 8.

    Aleuas lineatus Stål 1878, habitus. Male from Argentina, Prov. Chaco, Arroyo Palometa at National Route 11. Length 31.5 mm. Scale line 5 mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f08.gif

    Fig. 9.

    Aleuas lineatus Stål 1878, habitus. Female from Argentina, Prov. Chaco, Arroyo Palometa at National Route 11. Length 40.3 mm. Scale line 5 mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f09.gif

    Etymology.— From Latin, linea, thread or line, referring to the dark lines on pronotum.

    Taxonomy.— In its general aspect and coloration, this species looks like a smaller form of A. albinae. Head: integument smooth, matte; fastigium in dorsal view (Figs 21, 22), short, blunt, sides converging in an obtuse angle. Pronotum (Figs 21, 22): anterior margin of disk slightly curved or straight, posterior one projecting caudad in an obtuse angle, its apex rounded. Tegmina and wings surpassing end of abdomen in both sexes. Male abdominal terminalia (Fig. 25) with furculae absent or barely marked as undulations of margin of 10th segment, placed far apart; epiproct subquadrate with small triangular projection in posterior edge; cerci very large, strongly incurved, their apices spatulate (similar to those of A. albinae). Stridulatory mechanism with three modified pre-apical spines in the hind tibiae of males, none in the females; where the crossveins that in other species are raised, these are flat and hence without sound-producing function. Phallic complex (Fig. 30) similar in general to that of A. albinae, main differences lie in shape of epiphallus and of cingulum in dorsal view.

    General coloration light apple-green (61) to straw-yellow (56). Cinnamon (39) postocular bands continued on sides of pronotum where there are, immediately below them, white bands continuous on pro- and metazona; lower margins of pronotal lobes narrowly fringed with white. All legs straw-yellow (56), including hind tibiae and tarsi. Tegmina light apple-green at sides, the discal or vannal part very pale flesh-color (5).

    Affinities.— As said above, very closely related to A. albinae.

    Habitat.— Usually found in rather humid places, where the vegetation of grasses and Cyperaceae is rather dense (but usually not in the places described below as the habitat of A. vitticollis). It is even abundant in hills and sierras, whenever a small spring makes a patch of denser vegetation grow surrounded by much drier grassland. But it seems tolerant of drier situations, since some specimens can also be found (but not abundantly) in drier places with less dense vegetation. It is a diurnal species but also shows some nocturnal activity.

    Known distribution.— Bruner (1906:668) wrote: “This is the most abundant and, at the same time, most widely distributed species of the genus”. Working about a hundred years later, I have verified Bruner's statement. Recorded from Argentina: Provinces of Buenos Aires, La Pampa, Formosa, Chaco, Corrientes, San Juan, Tucumán, Santa Fe, Entre Rios, Mendoza, Rio Negro and Chubut. Brasil: Rio Grande do Sul. Paraguay: eastern part. Uruguay: whole country. According to what is known of its distribution in Argentina and Paraguay, it is very probable that its distribution in Brasil is much larger than recorded and includes the large area between Mato Grosso and Rio Grande do Sul (Fig. 37).

    Aleuas paraguayensis n. sp. Figs 10, 11, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25C, 31, 37. Table 5

    Fig. 10.

    Aleuas paraguayensis n. sp. habitus. Male from Paraguay, Dept. Caaguazú, near Ihú. Length 25.8 mm. Scale line 5 mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f10.gif

    Fig. 11.

    Aleuas paraguayensis n. sp. habitus. Female from Paraguay, Dept. Caaguazú, near Ihú. Length 37.8 mm. Scale line 5 mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f11.gif

    Etymology.— Refers to the country of its origin.

    Taxonomy.— A medium-sized species (Table 5). Head rather large and globose, especially in females, its integument very smooth and shiny; fastigium very short, in superior view roundly curved in females (Fig. 22), obtusely angulate in males (Fig. 21). Pronotum (Figs 21, 22): median carina almost obsolete; integument impresso-punctate over most of the surface, except in discal part of prozona, that being covered with cicatricose depressions placed close together. Tegmina and wings reaching or surpassing end of abdomen in both sexes. Male terminalia (Fig. 25) with triangular furculae placed close together, epiproct subquadrate, with small triangular projection in middle of caudal edge; cerci conical, incurved, greatly surpassing caudal end of epiproct. Stridulatory mechanism (Fig. 35) has three pre-apical modified spines in hind tibiae of both sexes, and a long series of prominent crossveins on the tegmina. Phallic complex (Fig. 31): apical valves of archendophallus of characteristic shape, in lateral view similar to same in most species of Zygoclistron (as figured in Carbonell 1969).

    Chromatic characters: the most colorful member of the genus. Antennae, lateral areas on pronotal prozona, and hind tarsi, scarlet (14). General body color sulphur yellow (57) to straw-yellow (56). Head with small black areas above antennal sockets (Fig. 20), and the following black bands: from upper parts of antennal sockets, continued narrowly on front margin of eyes; two sets of postocular bands, one from upper part of eyes to occiput, bordered on both sides with sulfur-yellow (157), other from lower part of margin of eye, fading towards middle of genae; another along basis of mandibles, the latter with black apices. Fore legs: tibiae cinnamon-rufous (40), femora with tawny (38) bands on upper surface: middle legs with femora sulphur-yellow (57), tibiae tawny (38) to scarlet (14) on upper surface: hind legs straw-yellow (56) with black bands along upper lateral carinae, this color fading to gray on upper parts of region of pinnae: hind tibiae black at bases, becoming flesh-color (5) and scarlet (14) at their tips. Tegmina sulphur-yellow (57) with pale yellow veins.

    Affinities.—Not clear: epiproct of the same general shape as that of A. lineatus and A. albinae; cerci similar in form to those of A. curtipennis, A. gracilis and A. uruguayensis, but proportionally much longer.

    Habitat.— The place where the known specimens of this species were found was mostly grassland, with spots of bushy vegetation.

    Known distribution.— Has been found only once in the province of Caaguazú of Paraguay, a few kilometers south of the town of Ihú (Fig. 37).

    Aleuas paranensis n. sp. Figs 12, 13, 20, 21, 22, 23, 26C, 32, 37. Table 6

    Fig. 12.

    Aleuas paranensis n. sp. habitus. Male from Argentina, Prov. Corrientes, Arroyo San Joaquin at Provincial Route 126. Length 28 mm. Scale line 5 mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f12.gif

    Fig. 13.

    Aleuas paranensis n. sp. habitus. Female from Argentina, Prov. Corrientes, Arroyo San Joaquin at Provincial Route 126. Length 44.5 mm. Scale line 5 mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f13.gif

    Etymology.— From the name of the Paraná River, that flows in the area where the species was found.

    Taxonomy.— A medium-sized species, females much larger than males (Table 6). Head: integument smooth, matte; fastigium in dorsal view triangular, its sides forming a right angle in males, a slightly acute one in females (Figs 21, 22). Pronotum: integument impressopunctate; front edge of pronotal disk slightly curved, almost straight, caudal one more definitely curved, in both sexes (Figs 21, 22) Tegmina and wings: reduced, reaching first third of abdomen in females, a little over half of it in males. Abdominal end in males (Fig. 26) with triangular furculae placed close together, epiproct triangular with slightly curved sides, cerci simple, conical, not reaching end of epiproct. Stridulatory mechanism with two modified pre-apical spines on hind tibiae, the stridulatory cross veins very prominent, covering a much larger area of the tegmina of males than in any other species. The known females are short-winged and without stridulatory crossveins. Phallic complex (Fig. 32) seems close to that of A. vitticollis.

    Chromatic characters.— General coloration cinnamon (39), russet (34) in parts. Head: in front view russet (34), with black areas above antennal sockets (Fig. 20); dorsally with median longitudinal russet area that turns gradually cinnamon (39) to the sides; in lateral view, very wide postocular bands that take up most of genae, with narrow light cinnamon (39) bands above and below it. This wide russet band continues on pronotal lateral lobes, and so does the narrow light-colored band on lower edges of genae, that on inferior edge of pronotal lobes becoming almost white. The rest of the body, tegmina and most of legs are light cinnamon (39); hind tibiae and tarsi in males are red; in females almost black internally on the apical third, turning light cinnamon (39) towards femoral articulation. Inner pagina of femora light cinnamon (39) in males, mostly black (Fig. 23) in females.

    Affinities.— Not clear, but probably closer to A. vitticollis than to any other species of the genus.

    Habitat.— The place where the species was collected is mostly grassland.

    Known distribution.— Argentina: South of the Province of Corrientes. Brasil: State of Rio Grande do Sul (Fig. 37).

    Aleuas uruguayensis n. sp. Figs 14, 15, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25D, 33, 37. Table 7

    Fig. 14.

    Aleuas uruguayensis n. sp. Habitus. Male from Uruguay, Dept. Rivera, Lunarejo. Length 27.3 mm. Scale line 5 mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f14.gif

    Fig. 15.

    Aleuas uruguayensis n. sp. Habitus. Female from Uruguay, Dept. Rivera, Lunarejo. Length 44.7 mm. Scale line 5 mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f15.gif

    Etymology.— Refers to the country where it was found.

    Taxonomy.— A small species, particularly the males (Table 7). Head: integument smooth, matte; fastigium in dorsal view projected forwards in a slightly obtuse angle (Figs 21, 22), a distinct median carina running from fastigium to occiput. Pronotum: integument strongly rugose, a well-marked, prominent median carina on pro- and metazona; anterior margin of pronotal disk strongly curved, posterior one obtuse-angulate (Figs 21, 22). Tegmina and wings much reduced in female, reaching end of 2nd abdominal segment; well developed and reaching end of abdomen in males. Abdominal male terminalia (Fig. 25): furculae triangular, acute, placed close together; epiproct subtriangular, with curved sides; cerci conical, tips incurved, reaching end of epiproct. Stridulatory mechanism absent. Phallic complex does not show any close relationship with any of the other species, and its cingulum (Fig. 33E) has a peculiar shape.

    Chromatic characters.— The only specimens at hand are rather teneral, so their colors may not correspond to those in mature specimens. General coloration buff (24); eyes, posterior part of pronotal metazona and tegmina tawny (38); ends of hind tibiae in male reddish, in female dark brown. In both sexes, a distinct black area at limit of metathoracic epimeron-episternum, and in females the dorsal parts of metanotum and first abdominal terga, as seen between the bases of the tegmina, and also a median band on epiproct, are black.

    Affinities.—Seems close to A. curtipennis, with which it shares the absence of a stridulatory mechanism.

    Habitat.— Herbaceous vegetation near a small stream.

    Known distribution.— Has been found only in northern Uruguay, in the east of the Department of Rivera (Fig. 37).

    Aleuas vitticollis Stål 1878 (= A. brachypterus Bruner 1906) Figs 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 26A, 34, 37. Table 8

    Fig. 16.

    Aleuas vitticollis Stål 1878, habitus. Male from Argentina, Prov. Corrientes Arroyo San Joaquin at Provincial Route 126. Length 38 mm. Scale line 5 mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f16.gif

    Fig. 17.

    Aleuas vitticollis Stål 1878, habitus. Brachypterous female from Uruguay, Dept. Flores, Arroyo Pinto. Length 50.6 mm. Scale line 5 mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f17.gif

    Fig. 18.

    Aleuas vitticollis Stål 1878, habitus. Macropterous female from Uruguay, Dept. Rivera, Tranqueras. Length 52.2 mm. Scale line 5 mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f18.gif

    Fig. 19.

    Aleuas vitticollis Stål 1878. Variability of pattern on head and pronotum in males and females. A, female, green form, from Uruguay, Dept. Flores, Arroyo Pinto. B, female, brown form, from Argentina, Prov. Corrientes, Arroyo San Joaquin; C, male from Argentina, Chaco, Arroyo Palometa; D, male from Uruguay, Rivera, Tranqueras; E, male from Paraguay, Paraguarí, Sapucay. Scale line 5 mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f19.gif

    Fig. 20.

    Genus Aleuas, frontal views of head; species as indicated. Rows A, B, females; C, D, males. Scale line 5 mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f20.gif

    Fig. 21.

    Genus Aleuas, dorsal views of head + pronotum, males, species as indicated. Scale line 5 mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f21.gif

    Fig. 22.

    Genus Aleuas, dorsal views of head and pronotum, females, species as indicated. Scale line 5 mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f22.gif

    Etymology.— From Latin vitta a band or ribbon and collum, the neck, referring to the dark bands on the pronotum.

    Taxonomy.— A rather large species, especially the females (Table 8). Head (Figs 20, 21, 22): integument smooth, matte; fastigium in dorsal view short, rather rounded or slightly angulated forwards in a very obtuse angle. Pronotum (Figs 21, 22), integument markedly pitted throughout, in dorsal view the anterior margin very slightly curved, almost straight; posterior one curved or very obtusely angulate; most females short-winged, their tegmina reaching the hind margin of the third abdominal tergite; about 1% of them long-winged, though their tegminae do not quite reach the abdominal end, all males long-winged, tegmina not or barely reaching abdominal end. Stridulatory mechanism: only two subterminal spines on hind tibiae slightly modified; in males and long-winged females, very few (5–7) crossveins adapted for this function. Male abdominal terminalia (Fig. 26) with very acute triangular furculae, placed close together, subtriangular epiproct, cerci simple, acute, slightly outcurved at apices.

    Fig. 23.

    Genus Aleuas, internal view of hind legs, females, species as indicated. Scale line 5 mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f23.gif

    Fig. 24.

    Genus Aleuas, internal view of hind legs, females, species as indicated. Scale line 5 mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f24.gif

    Fig. 25.

    Genus Aleuas, end of male abdomen, dorsal and lateral views, species as indicated. Scale lines 1 mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f25.gif

    Chromatic characters.— Females of this species have two color forms, one pale apple-green (61), the other pale cinnamon (39). All long-winged specimens found are of the green form. All specimens of both forms have fuscous (21) postocular bands continued on the sides of the pronotum and on the tegmina; reaching almost the end of the tegmina in short-winged specimens of the cinnamon form; marked only on their bases and gradually fading away on first half of the tegmina in short and long-winged specimens of the green form; another fuscous band runs along median longitudinal prothoracic carina and continues on dorsum of abdominal segments I and II, visible between bases of tegmina.

    While in the green form genae and lateral lobes of the pronotum are apple-green, the latter narrowly fringed with white on their lower margin, in the cinnamon form, genae and lateral lobes of pronotum are marked with two or more tenuous longitudinal fuscous bands, not seen in green specimens; the lower part of the genae in these cinnamon specimens is cream-color (54); of this same color are wide bands along lower parts of lateral lobes, that continue on mesothoracic episterna. Fore and middle legs are of the prevalent body color; in the cinnamon form they are brownish, including the tarsi: hind femora are colored like the body, hind tibiae in all specimens have black bases, the rest of the tibiae and the tarsi are purple (101). No different color forms found in the males. Vertex of head mostly fuscous (21); yellow (157) bands begin on upper part of eyes and reach occiput above the fuscous postocular bands. Pronotal disk and upper (vannal) areas of tegmina light apple-green (61), rest of tegmina of a very pale hue of this color; lateral lobes of pronotum with same longitudinal fuscous bands as described for the female, a cream-color (54) wide band begins on lower parts of cephalic genae, covers the lower part of pronotal lateral lobes and continues on mesosterna and mesepimera; on pronotal lobes, above the mentioned cream-color band is a tenuous citrine (51) band, and between this and the upper piceous band the surfaces are mostly sulphur-yellow (57), with some irregular tenuous spots of citrine or cinnamon color. All legs buff-yellow (53), the fore and middle ones with indistinct cinnamon-rufous bands on upper parts of femora; hind tibiae buff-yellow (53) on external sides; interior and upper surfaces, and tarsi mostly scarlet; tibial spines white with black apices.

    As indicated in the second part of this work, Stål's type of this species is a long-winged female, while in Bruner's type series according to his description, there is a short-winged one of the same species, hence the specific name (brachypterus) given to it by Bruner.

    Fig. 26.

    Genus Aleuas, end of male abdomen, dorsal and lateral views, species as indicated. Scale lines 1 mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f26.gif

    Fig. 27.

    Aleuas albinae n. sp. Phallic complex. Scale line 1 mm. A, lateral view, without epiphallus; B, cingulum, lateral; C endophallus, lateral; D, dorsal view, without epiphallus; E, cingulum, dorsal; F, endophallus, dorsal; G, epiphallus, dorsal; H, same, frontal; I, same, lateral.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f27.gif

    Fig. 28.

    Aleuas curtipennis Bruner. Phallic complex. Scale line 1 mm. Letters A to I, see caption to Fig. 27.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f28.gif

    Fig. 29.

    Aleuas gracilis Stål. Phallic complex. Scale line 1 mm. Letters A to I, see caption to Fig. 27.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f29.gif

    Fig. 30.

    Aleuas lineatus Stål. Phallic complex. Scale line 1 mm. Letters A to I, see caption to Fig. 27.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f30.gif

    Fig. 31.

    Aleuas paraguayensis n. sp. Phallic complex. Scale line 1 mm. Letters A to I, see caption to Fig. 27.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f31.gif

    Fig. 32.

    Aleuas paranensis n. sp. Phallic complex. Scale line 1 mm. Letters A to I, see caption to Fig. 27.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f32.gif

    Known distribution.— Brasil: Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul (probably from this state south to Rio Grande do Sul). Paraguay (east). Uruguay: whole country. Argentina: from Formosa and Misiones south to Buenos Aires and La Pampa (Fig. 37).

    Affinities.— Closer to A. paranensis than to any other species.

    Habitat.— The habitat and ethology of this species have been described by Carbonell (1956). It has been found only in a particular habitat, formed by dense associations of tall grasses (about 1 m high) in low and humid places near water. The species was rare in collections, until the discovery that it is active only at night; in the daytime the insects are hidden at the base of the dense grass formations. At night the insects climb to the upper parts of the vegetation to feed and to mate. In the same places where it was very difficult to find one specimen in the daytime, they could be collected by the hundred at night. The grasses on which this species live are Panicum grumosum and Paspalum exaltatum. Another grass species that forms dense associations in low places is Cortaderia selloana, but A. vitticollis was not found in this habitat. Aleuas albinae shares this particular habitat with A. vitticollis, but is considerably scarcer. Both species are, in Uruguay at least, late developing ones; the first adults are usually found late in January or in the first days of February.

    Fig. 33.

    Aleuas uruguayensis n. sp. Phallic complex. Scale line 1 mm. Letters A to I, see caption to Fig. 27.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f33.gif

    Fig. 34.

    Aleuas vitticollis Stål. Phallic complex. Scale line 1 mm. Letters A to I, see caption to Fig. 27.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f34.gif

    Fig. 35.

    Stridulatory mechanism in Aleuas. A, Left tegmen, arrow indicates area of crossveins which are part of the stridulatory mechanism; B, region of the tegmen where these crossveins are located, arrow indicates the area; C, superior view of this area on right tegmen, arrows indicate the crossveins projecting from tegmen surface; D, apical part of right hind tibia, dorsal; E, same, lateral: arrows indicate the three tibial spines involved in stridulation. The species is A. paraguayensis. Scale lines 1 mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f35.gif

    Fig. 36.

    Measurements taken, as registered in Tables 1 to 8.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f36.gif

    Fig. 37.

    Genus Aleuas Stål. Geographical distribution of genus and species.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-f37.gif

    It is worth mentioning here that a species of the related genus Zygoclystron (Z. trachystictum Rehn 1905) also has nocturnal habits. It does not live on grasses but in patches of the composite plant, Vernonia nodiflora. Like A. vitticollis, it stays hidden during the day, and becomes active at night, when it climbs the Vernonia plants and can be easily found (Carbonell 1969).

    Discussion on the taxonomy of the genus and its species

    As already mentioned in the introduction of this work, the genus Aleuas is very closely related to Zygoclistron. The species of these genera look different, and cannot be confused. However, when trying to define their differences, one finds they are not so great as they seem at first sight; they look different mainly because of their different colors and color patterns. The most important differences are given in the following table; some are shown in Fig. 1.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-t01.gif

    The relationships among the species of Aleuas are difficult to interpret. A. albinae and A. lineatus are so much alike, that the first seems to be a larger version of the second. The most important morphological difference lies in the abdominal terminalia of the males, (Figs 25, A, B) but even these are small. On the other hand, these male terminalia are different from those of the rest of the species of the genus, and similar to those of the genus Zygoclistron. The females, except for their different sizes, are so much alike that the most visible difference lies in the colors of their hind tibiae. A. gracilis, A. paranensis and A. vitticollis show clear affinities. A. paraguayensis seems rather isolated; its male terminalia have an epiproct like that in A. albinae and A. lineatus, but the cerci are different, shaped as in the rest of the species. Its chromatic characters are also peculiar. A. curtipennis and A. uruguayensis are different from the rest of the species of the genus, and the males of both species lack the stridulatory mechanism present in all the others.

    Acknowledgments

    Preliminary work related to this paper was carried on in the museums where the types of the studied species are kept. The last stage was done in the Universidad de la República, Uruguay, under the auspices of the “Programa para el Desarrollo de las Ciencias básicas” (PEDECIBA). I gratefully acknowledge the help of the curators and collection managers of the museums mentioned in this work for their assistance during my visits and the loan of specimens. Among them particularly to Dr. Daniel Otte of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, and Dr. Miguel A. Monné, of the Museu Nacional of Rio de Janeiro. Dr. Sonia Turk of the Fundación Miguel Lillo in Tucumán gave me data on the distribution of some species in that province. My thanks too, to the reviewers of the text. And, as always, to my wife Albina and other members of my family for their permanent help on the domestic front.

    References

    1. C. Amedegnato 1974. Les genres d'acridiens néotropicaux, leur classification par familles, sous-familles et tribus. Acrida 3:193–204. Google Scholar

    2. O. Baucke 1954. Catalogo dos insetos encontrados no Rio Grande do Sul (Orthoptera, Acridoidea). Revista Agronomica, Porto Alegre 17:2–11. pl. 1–7. Google Scholar

    3. A. Bentos-Pereira and E. Lorier . 1995. Taxonomic value of the cuticular structures of the stomodeum in Acridomorpha. Journal of Orthoptera Research 4:185–195. Google Scholar

    4. L. Bruner 1900. The second report of the Merchant's Locust Investigation Commission of Buenos Aires. Lincoln. Nebraska. pp. Google Scholar

    5. L. Bruner 1906. Synoptic list of Paraguayan Acrididae or locusts, with descriptions of new forms. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 30:613–694. Google Scholar

    6. L. Bruner 1911. South American Acridoidea. Annals of the Carnegie Museum 8:15–147. Google Scholar

    7. K. Brunner von Wattenwyl 1893. Révision du système des Orthoptères et description des espèces rapportés par M. Leonardo Fea de Birmanie. Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Genova, Ser. 2 13:5–230. lam. 1–6. Google Scholar

    8. A. L. Cabrera and A. Willink . 1973. Biogeografía de América Latina Organización de los Estados Americanos, Monografía N° 13, Serie de Biología. pp. Google Scholar

    9. M. J. Campodonico and F. H. Santoro . 1971. Identificación de acridios (Orthoptera) por las esculturas del corion. Revista de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, Ser.5, Patología Vegetal 8:63–82. Google Scholar

    10. C. S. Carbonell 1956. Sobre el habitat y la etología de las especies uruguayas de Aleuas (Orthoptera, Acrid.). Revista de la Sociedad Uruguaya de Entomología 1:49–55. Google Scholar

    11. C. S. Carbonell 1969. Revision of the genus Zygoclistron Rehn, 1905 (Orthoptera, Acridoidea). Transactions of the American Entomological Society 95:571–602. Google Scholar

    12. C. S. Carbonell 1974. Una nueva especie del género Zygoclistron Rehn 1905 (Orthoptera, Acrididae, Aleuinae) del Monte Roraima. Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina 34:271–275. Google Scholar

    13. M. M. Cigliano, S. Torrusio, and M. L. de Wysiecki . 2002. Grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) community composition and temporal variation in the pampas, Argentina. Journal of Orthoptera Research 11:215–221. Google Scholar

    14. M. M. Cigliano, M. L. de Wysiecki, and C. E. Lange . 1995. Disminución de la abundancia de Dichroplus maculipennis (Orthoptera: Acridoidea) en comunidades del sudoeste de la provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina 54:41–42. Google Scholar

    15. M. M. Cigliano, M. L. de Wysiecki, and C. E. Lange . 2000. Grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acridoidea) species diversity in the Pampas, Argentina. Diversity and Distributions 6:81–91. Google Scholar

    16. COPR 1982. The Locust and Grasshopper Agricultural Manual. Published by the Centre for Overseas Pest Research. London. vii +. pp. Google Scholar

    17. M. K. Mda Costa and L. J. Jantsch . 1999. Acridóideos (Orthoptera, Caelifera, Acridoidea) ocorrentes no Rio Grande do Sul. Biociências (Porto Alegre) 7:135–155. Google Scholar

    18. M. Descamps 1976. Le peuplement acridien d'un pèrimétre d'Amazonie colombienne. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France (N.S.) 12:291–318. Google Scholar

    19. M. Descamps 1984. Revue préliminaire de la tribu des Copiocerini (Orth. Acrididae). Mémoires du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, Sér. A, Zoologie 130:1–72. Google Scholar

    20. V. M. Dirsh 1956. The phallic complex in Acridoidea (Orthoptera) in relation to taxonomy. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 108:223–356. 66 pl. Google Scholar

    21. V. M. Dirsh 1957. The spermatheca as a taxonomic character in Acridoidea (Orthoptera). Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London, A 32:107–114. Google Scholar

    22. V. M. Dirsh 1961. A preliminary revision of the families and subfamilies of Acridoidea (Orthoptera, Insecta). Bulletin of the British Museum (N.H.) Entomology 10:351–419. Google Scholar

    23. V. M. Dirsh 1968. The post-embryonic ontogeny of Acridomorpha (Orthoptera). EOS, Madrid 43:413–514. Google Scholar

    24. Ml de Wysiecki, N. Sanchez, and S. E. Ricci . 2000. Grassland and shrubland grasshopper community composition in northern La Pampa province, Argentina. Journal of Orthoptera Research 9:211–221. Google Scholar

    25. A. Ferreira 1975. Estudos citologicos em acridoideos brasileiros. Aleuas gracilis, uma espécie com um sistema de determinaçao sexual do tipo neo XY altamente evoluido. Ciência e Cultura 27:426–432. Google Scholar

    26. A. Ferreira 1978. DNA content in species belonging to the families Acrididae, Ommexechidae, Romaleidae (superfamily Acridoidea) and Proscopiidae (superfamily Proscopiodea). Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina 36:197735–40. Google Scholar

    27. A. Ferreira and A. Mesa . 1979. Neo-XY sex chromosomes in Zygoclistron nasicum (Orthoptera, Acridoidea). Caryologia, Firenze 32:53–59. Google Scholar

    28. S. K. Gangwere and R. A. Ronderos . 1975. A synopsis of food selection in Argentine Acridoidea. Acrida 4:173–194. Google Scholar

    29. E. Giglio-Tos 1898. Viaggio del Dr. Enrico Festa nella Republica dell'Ecuador e regioni vicine. VI, Ortotteri. Bollettino dei Musei di Zoologia ed Anatomia Comparata della R. Universitá di Torino 13:1–108. Google Scholar

    30. D. J. Greathead 1963. A review of the insect enemies of Acridoidea (Orthoptera). Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 114:437–517. Google Scholar

    31. W. F. Kirby 1910. A synonymic catalogue of Orthoptera. Vol. 3. Orthoptera Saltatoria. Part. 2. (Locustidae vel Acrididae). British Museum. London. pp. Google Scholar

    32. C. E. Lange 1992. Espectro hospedador natural y persistencia de Perezia dichroplusae y Nosema locustae (Protozoa: Microspora) en acridios argentinos (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Neotropica 38:65–74. Google Scholar

    33. C. E. Lange 1996. Melanoplinos (Orthoptera: Acrididae) afectados por micosis en la provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina 55:107–109. Google Scholar

    34. C. E. Lange and M. L. De Wysiecki . 1996. The fate of Nosema locustae (Microsporida: Nosematidae) in Argentine grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Biological Control 7:24–29. Google Scholar

    35. J. Liebermann 1928. Preliminares para el estudio de los acridoideos argentinos. Anales de la Sociedad Científica Argentina 104:137–158. Google Scholar

    36. J. Liebermann 1939. Catálogo sistemático y biogeográfico de acridoideos argentinos. Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina 10:125–230. Google Scholar

    37. J. Liebermann 1941a. Contribución a la Zoogeografía, taxonomía y ecología de los acridoideos de Entre Rios. Publicación del Ministerio de Hacienda, Justicia e Instrucción Pública de Paraná. Entre Rios. pp., 9 pl. Google Scholar

    38. J. Liebermann 1941b. Lista de los acridoideos de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Anuario Rural, Dirección de Agricultura Ganadería e Industrias, La Plata 9:155–158. Google Scholar

    39. J. Liebermann 1948. Los acridios de Santa Fe. Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina 14:56–114. Google Scholar

    40. J. Liebermann 1949a. Los acridios de la zona subandina de Neuquén, Rio Negro y Chubut. Revista del Instituto Nacional de Investigación de las Ciencias Naturales, Buenos Aires. Ciencias Zoológicas 1:127–160. Google Scholar

    41. J. Liebermann 1949b. Sobre una colección de acridios argentinos del Naturhistorischen Museum de Viena (Orth. Acrid.). Instituto de Sanidad Vegetal, Buenos Aires, año 5, Ser. A, N° 46. pp. Google Scholar

    42. J. Liebermann 1950. Los acridios de San Juan. Instituto de Sanidad Vegetal, Buenos Aires, año 6, Ser. A, N° 50. pp. Google Scholar

    43. J. Liebermann 1951a. Acridios del territorio del Chubut y la zona militar de Comodoro Rivadavia. IDIA, Buenos Aires 37–38–3921–32. Google Scholar

    44. J. Liebermann 1951b. Los acridios de Corrientes. IDIA, Buenos Aires 42–4339–48. Google Scholar

    45. J. Liebermann 1955. Primeira relaçao sistemática dos acridoideos do Brasil. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 53:329–344. Google Scholar

    46. J. Liebermann 1957. Materiales típicos de acridios en las colecciones entomológicas de la Argentina. IDIA, Buenos Aires 116:17–20. Google Scholar

    47. J. Liebermann 1958a. Los acridios de Formosa (Orth. Caelif. Acridoidea). Instituto de Patología Vegetal, Buenos Aires, Año 1, Publicación Técnica N° 5. pp., 1 map. Google Scholar

    48. J. Liebermann 1958b. Zoogeografía, sistemática y economía de los acridoideos de la Patagonia. Instituto de Patología Vegetal, Buenos Aires, Año 1, Publicación Técnica N° 6. pp, 4 pl. Google Scholar

    49. J. Liebermann 1960. Las tucuras del Tandil (Orth. Catantopidae). IDIA, Buenos Aires 151:37–40. Google Scholar

    50. J. Liebermann 1963. Nueva contribución al conocimiento de las tucuras (Orth. Acrid.) de la provincia de Chubut. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Buenos Aires, Serie Informes Técnicos N° 56. pp. [mimeograph.]. Google Scholar

    51. J. Liebermann 1967. Contribución al conocimiento de las tucuras de La Pampa (Orth. Acrididae). Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina 29:101–113. Google Scholar

    52. J. Liebermann 1968. Sobre algunas colecciones de tucuras en la provincia de Córdoba. IDIA Buenos Aires N° 251:44–48. Google Scholar

    53. J. Liebermann 1972a. Identificación de tucuras recolectadas en 1971 por el Ministerio de Agricultura de Santa Fe en el Departamento de San Jerónimo. IDIA Buenos Aires N° 290:6–8. Google Scholar

    54. J. Liebermann 1972b. The current state of the locust and grasshopper problem in Argentina. pp. 191–198. In. Proceedings of the International Study Conference on the Current and Future Problems of Acridiology. Centre for Overseas Pest Research. London. Google Scholar

    55. J. Liebermann and A. A. Piran . 1941. Primera lista de acridios uruguayos. Dirección General y de Contralor de la Lucha Contra la Langosta, Montevideo. pp. Google Scholar

    56. J. Liebermann and A. Ruffinelli . 1946. Catálogo de acridoideos uruguayos. Revista de la Asociación de Ingenieros Agrónomos, Montevideo 74:9–21. Google Scholar

    57. E. Lorier, M. D. García, M. E. Clemente, and J. J. Presa . 2002. Calling behavior and morphology of the stridulatory apparatus in Neotropical grasshoppers (Aleuas Stål; Orthoptera). Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 37:71–78. Google Scholar

    58. G. C. Luna, J. E. Henry, and R. A. Ronderos . 1981. Infecciones experimentales y naturales con protozoos patógenos en acridios de la República Argentina (Insecta, Orthoptera). Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina 40:243–247. Google Scholar

    59. A. Mesa 1956. Los cromosomas de algunos acridoideos uruguayos (Orthoptera, Caelifera, Acridoidea). Agros, Revista de la Asociación de Estudiantes de Agronomía, Montevideo 141:32–45. Google Scholar

    60. A. Mesa, A. Ferreira, and C. S. Carbonell . 1982. Cariología de los acridoideos neotropicales: estado actual de su conocimiento y nuevas contribuciones. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France (N.S.) 18:507–526. Google Scholar

    61. D. Otte 1978. The primary types of Orthoptera (Saltatoria, Mantodea, Phasmatodea and Blattodea) at the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 130:26–87. Google Scholar

    62. J. A. G. Rehn 1905. Records of some Paraguayan Orthoptera, with the description of a new genus and species. Entomological News 16:37–42. Google Scholar

    63. J. A. G. Rehn 1907. Nonsaltatorial and acridoid Orthoptera from Sapucay, Paraguay. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 59:151–192. Google Scholar

    64. J. A. G. Rehn 1909. On Brazilian grasshopppers of the subfamilies Pyrgomorphinae and Locustinae (Acridinae of authors). Proceedings of the United States National Museum 36:109–163. Google Scholar

    65. J. A. G. Rehn 1913. A contribution to the knowledge of the Orthoptera of Argentina. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 63:273–379. Google Scholar

    66. J. A. G. Rehn 1915. A further contribution to the knowledge of the Orthoptera of Argentina. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 67:270–292. Google Scholar

    67. R. A. Ronderos 1959. Identificación de las especies de tucuras mas comunes en la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Agro, Buenos Aires 1:1–31. 4 pl. Google Scholar

    68. R. A. Ronderos 1964. Contribución al conocimiento del complejo fálico en especies de los géneros Aleuas Stål y Dichroplus Stål de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (Orthoptera, Acrididae). Revista de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, Buenos Aires, Ser.5, Patología Vegetal 1:55–96. 2 tab. Google Scholar

    69. R. A. Ronderos, M. O. Arriaga, and N. E. Sanchez . 1981. Estudio preliminar sobre la selectividad alimenticia en especies de acridios de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (Argentina). Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina 40:73–82. Google Scholar

    70. A. Ruffinelli and C. S. Carbonell . 1944. Primera lista sistemática de insectos relacionados con la agricultura nacional. Revista de la Asociación de Ingenieros Agrónomos, Montevideo 1:13–32. Google Scholar

    71. A. Ruffinelli and C. S. Carbonell . 1954. Segunda lista de insectos y otros artrópodos de importancia económica en el Uruguay. Revista de la Asociación de Ingenieros Agrónomos, Montevideo 94:33–82. Google Scholar

    72. F. A. Saez 1956. Estudios citogenéticos en ortópteros sudamericanos. Biología, Chile 22:21–26. Google Scholar

    73. N. E. Sanchez 1981. Variaciones estacionales de la fauna de acrididos en un pastizal sucesional de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (Argentina). Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina 39:227–234. Google Scholar

    74. N. E. Sanchez and M. L. De Wysiecki . 1993. Abundancia y diversidad de acridios (Orthoptera: Acrididae) en pasturas de la provincia de La Pampa, Argentina. Revista de Investigaciones Agropecuarias 24:29–39. Google Scholar

    75. A. Silveira-Guido, J. F. Carbonell-Bruhm, O. Nuñez, and E. Valdes . 1958. Investigaciones sobre acridoideos del Uruguay. Facultad de Agronomía, Montevideo. pp. Google Scholar

    76. Y. Sjöstedt 1933. Orthopterentypen im Naturhistorischen Reichsmuseum zu Stockholm. 2, Acrididae. Arkiv för Zoologi 24:1–89. 20 pl. Google Scholar

    77. F. B. Smithe 1975. Naturalists' Color Guide. American Museum Natural History. New York. pp., 7pl. Google Scholar

    78. C. Stål 1878. Systema acridiodeorum. Essai d'une systematisation des acridoidées. Bihang till Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-akademiens Handlingar 5:1–100. Google Scholar

    Appendices

    Appendix I.

    The genus Aleuas and its species: taxonomy, synonymy, localities of collection, repositories, references

    Repositories of the specimens are designated in the text as follows: ANN ARBOR / Museum of Zoology of the University of Michigan, USA. LA PLATA / Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, La Plata, Argentina. MONTEVIDEO / Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Uruguay. PARIS / Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France. PHILADELPHIA / Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, USA. RIO DE JANEIRO / Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. VIENNA / Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, Vienna, Austria.

    Genus ALEUAS Stål 1878

    Typus generis: Aleuas vitticollis Stål 1878, as selected by Rehn 1907

    Stål 1878: 25 (in key of genera), 69. Brunner von Wattenwyl 1893 (in key of genera). Giglio-Tos 1898: 47 (in key). Rehn 1905: 39 (relationship with Zygoclistron Rehn 1905). 1907: 184 (type selection). Bruner 1906: 667 (key to species), 1911: 100 (key to species). Liebermann 1939: 83. Dirsh 1956:256, 1961: 397. Ronderos 1964:55, 96 (phallic complex). Carbonell 1956: 49–55 (habitat, ecology), 1969: 575 (comparison with Zygoclistron Rehn). Descamps 1976: 203 (ecol. of spp.). Ferreira, Mesa & Carbonell 1979: 53–54 (relationship with Zygoclistron).

    Species of the genus Aleuas (in alphabetical order)

    Aleuas albinae n.sp.

  • Carbonell 1956: 50 (as Aleuas sp.). Mesa et al. 1982 (as n. sp. N° 1).

  • Holotype.— A male labeled “Uruguay, Florida, Casupá, 9 Mar. 1961, C.S. Carbonell and A. Mesa”, in MONTEVIDEO.

    Paratypes.— Same data as holotype, 5 males and 14 females. “Uruguay, Rivera, Sierra de la Aurora, 14 Mar. 1961, 2 males, 1 female.“Uruguay, Rivera, Tranqueras, Bañado de Zanja Honda, 14 Mar. 1961, C.S.Carbonell”, 2 females. “Uruguay, Paysandú, Puerto Pepeají, Carbonell, Morey, Monné”, 2 females. Distributed in MONTEVIDEO, LA PLATA, RIO DE JANEIRO, ANN ARBOR, PARIS, PHILADELPHIA.

    Aleuas curtipennis Bruner 1911

  • Bruner 1911: 101 (descr.). Liebermann 1955: 341 (distr.). Otte 1978:28 (location of type).

  • Hololectotype.— A male in PHILADELPHIA , from Brasil, Mato Grosso, Chapada dos Guimaraes, labeled “Aleuas curtipennis, Type, Bruner” “Chapada, April, H.H. Smith” marked as lectotype by J. Liebermann, here selected as such. Paratype (marked as allotype by Liebermann) a female from same locality as above male, also marked as “type” by Bruner, “Chapada, May, H.H. Smith”.

    Other specimens examined.— 2 males and 2 females from Brasil, Mato Grosso, Chapada dos Guimaraes, Mar 1979, O. Roppa & B. Silva: 1 male from Brasil, Mato Grosso, BR 364, km. 349, Feb 1978, B. Silva: 1 male, 2 females from Brasil, Goias, Mineiros, Feb 1979, O. Roppa & B. Silva. In MONTEVIDEO and RIO DE JANEIRO.

    Aleuas gracilis Stål 1878

    Stål 1878: 70 (descr.). Rehn 1905: 39 (distr.), 1907: 184 (distr.), 1915: 285 (distr). Bruner 1906: 668 (distr.), 1911: 101(distr.). Kirby 1910: 427. Sjöstedt 1933: 63 (type, illustr.). Liebermann 1939: 195 (distr.), 1955: 341 (distr.). Dirsh 1956: 279, pl. 50, Fig. 9 (epiphallus). Ferreira 1975: 427 (caryology, illustr. chromosomes), 1978: 36–39 (caryology). Mesa et al. 1982: 520 (caryology).

    Holotype.— A male in VIENNA, labeled “A. gracilis Stål” “1270 Brasil” “Coll. Br. v. W. Brasilien” “76–1270”. This specimen, (like all the other types of Stål in the Vienna collection) was not marked as type. In 1966 I marked it as holotype of the species.

    Other specimens examined.— 1 male, 1 female, “Paraguay, Sapucay, 11 Mar 1905 A. Foster” in PHILADELPHIA. 3 males, Brasil, Mato Grosso do Sul, Corguinho, 2 Feb 1969, H. Ferreira” in MONTEVIDEO.

    This species seems to be rather uncommon. It has been found so far in: Argentina: Misiones. Brasil: Mato Grosso do Sul. Paraguay: eastern part.

    Aleuas lineatus Stål 1878

    Stål 1878: 70 (descr.). Bruner 1900: 66 (distr. illustr.), 1906: 668 (distr. illustr.). Kirby 1910: 427. Rehn 1913: 338 (distr). Liebermann 1928: 153 (distr.), 1939: 195 (distr.), 1941a: 33 (distr.), 1948: 88 (distr.), 1949a: 144 (distr.), 1949b: 5 (distr.), 1950: 10 (distr.), 1951a: 26 (distr.), 1951b: 46 (distr.), 1958a: 13 (distr.), 1958b: 39 (distr), 1960: 38 (distr.) 1963: 7 (distr.), 1967: 109 (distr.), 1968: 48 (distr), 1972a: 7 (distr.) 1972b: 194 (distr. econ.). Sjöstedt 1933: 36 pl.7, Fig. 9 (type, illustr.). Liebermann-Piran 1941: 11 (distr.). Liebermann-Ruffinelli 1946: 13 (distr.). Baucke 1954: 2 (distr., illustr.). Ruffinelli-Carbonell 1954: 39 (distr.). Carbonell 1956: 49–53 (habitat, ecol.). Mesa 1956: 36 (caryology). Silveira et al. 1958: 386 (ecol. econ.). Ronderos 1959: 18 (in key), 1964: 64 (redescr., phallic complex). Greathead 1963: 495 (insect enemies). Ferreira 1975: 432 (caryology). Campodonico-Santoro 1971: 66,68, Fig. 17 (eggs). Gangwere-Ronderos 1975: 178 (food selection). Ferreira 1975: 432 (caryol.) Santoro 1976: 2 (antennae, ontogeny). Luna et al. 1981: 245 (pathol.). Ronderos et al. 1981: 74 (biol. ecol.). Sanchez 1981: 228 (biol. ecol.). Mesa et al. 1982: 520 (caryology). COPR 1982: 180 (distr, ecol. econ. Illustr.). Lange 1992: 65–74 (pathol.), 1996: 108 (pathol.). Sanchez-De Wysiecki 1993: 31–39 (distr. ecol.). Bentos Pereira-Lorier 1995: 191, 195, Fig. 40 (anat. stomodeum) Cigliano et al. 1995: 41 (ecol.). Lange-De Wysiecki 1996: 24–39 (pathol.). Costa-Jantsch 1999: 145 (distr.). De Wysiecki et al. 2000: 212 (ethol. distr). Cigliano et al. 2000: 88 (ethol.). Lorier et al. 2002: 71 (ethol. stridulation, anat.). Cigliano et al. 2002: 215 (ecol.).

    Type-series.— A male and a female in STOCKHOLM, labeled as this species and also “Buen. Ayr.” “Berg” [Buenos Aires, Argentina] of which the male may be considered as the holotype. Paratypes: the above-mentioned female, and 1 male with the same data as the holotype, and 1 male labeled “Banda Oriental, C.Berg”, (Banda Oriental is an old name for Uruguay). There is also another female labeled “Buen. Ayr.” “Kinb.” that is probably also a paratype. This last female must have been collected by Kinberg, the physician on board the frigate “Eugenie”, who collected the insects during its trip. These paratypes are conspecific with the specimens mentioned in the first place but, except for the female mentioned, do not have identification labels.

    This is the most common and widespread species of the genus. It would be of little use and a waste of space to give full information of the specimens examined. It has been found in Argentina: Provinces of Santa Fe, Buenos Aires, La Pampa, Formosa, Chaco, Tucumán, Corrientes, San Juan, Entre Rios, Mendoza, Rio Negro, Chubut. Brasil: Rio Grande do Sul. Paraguay: eastern part. Uruguay: whole country.

    Aleuas paraguayensis n. sp. Mesa et al. 1982 (as n. sp. N° 2).

    Holotype.— A male from Paraguay, Dpto. Caaguazú. 40 km N. of town of Caaguazú, near Ihú. 13 Mar 1965, Carbonell, Mesa & Monné, in MONTEVIDEO. Paratypes: 3 males and 7 females, same data as holotype. In MONTEVIDEO; LA PLATA; RIO DE JANEIRO; PARIS; PHILADELPHIA.

    Aleuas paranensis n. sp. Mesa et al. 1982 (as n. sp. N° 3).

    Holotype.— A male from Argentina: Prov. Corrientes, Ruta Provincial 126, Arroyo San Joaquín, 20 Mar 1965, Carbonell, Mesa & Monné, in LA PLATA. Paratypes: 3 males and 5 females, same data as holotype: 1 female Argentina, Corrientes, 30 km N. of Paso de los Libres, 20 Mar 1965, Carbonell, Mesa & Monné: From Brasil: Rio Grande do Sul, Pelotas; 1 female 21 Apr 1967, G. Toques; 1 female 13 Mar 1961, B. Silva; 2 males 15 May 1960, C. Biezanko, 1 female 7 May 1962, C. Biezanko; 1 female 7 Apr. 1966, Pierubum; 1 female 3 Apr 1967, Germano. In MONTEVIDEO, RIO DE JANEIRO, PARIS, PHILADELPHIA

    Aleuas uruguayensis n. sp.

    Holotype.— A male from Uruguay, Dpto. Rivera, Lunarejo, Cañada Las Yeguas, 30.X. 1995, M.E. Martínez. Paratypes: 1 male, 1 female, same data as holotype, All in MONTEVIDEO.

    Aleuas vitticollis Stål 1878 (=Aleuas brachypterus Bruner 1906)

    Stål 1878: 69 (descr.). Rehn 1905: 39 (distr.), 1907: 184 (design. as typus generis) 1909: 144 (distr.), 1913: 338 (distr.). Bruner 1906: 667 (distr.), 1911: 101 (distr.), 1919: 74 (distr.). Kirby 1910: 427. Sjöstedt 1933: 36, pl.17, Fig. 8 (type, illustr.). Liebermann 1939: 195 (distr.), 1955: 341 (distr.). Liebermann-Piran 1941: 11 (distr.). Liebermann-Ruffinelli 1946: 13 (distr.). Ronderos 1964: 67 (phallic complex). Mesa et al. 1982: 520 (caryology). Carbonell 1956: 50 (habitat, ethol.). Ferreira 1975: 432 (caryol.). Gangwere-Ronderos 1975: 178 (food selection). Sanchez 1981: 228 (bionom. ecol.). Ronderos et al. 1981: 74 (bionom. ecol.). Costa-Jantsch 1999: 145 (distr.) Lorier et al. 2002: 71 (ethol. anat.).

    Aleuas brachypterus Bruner 1906

    Bruner 1906: 667 (descr.). Rehn 1907: 184 (distr.), 1913: 338 (distr., prob. syn. of A. vitticollis). Kirby 1910: 427. Liebermann 1939: 196 (distr.), 1941a: 33 (distr.), 1941b: 157 (distr.), 1948: 89 (distr.), 1957: 19 (distr., descr. male), 1968: 48, 1972a: 7. Liebermann-Piran 1941: 11 (distr.). Liebermann-Ruffinelli 1946: 13 (distr.). Carbonell 1956: 50 (habitat, ecol.). Mesa 1956: 36 (caryology). Saez 1956: 24 (caryology). Ferreira 1975: 432 (caryology). Costa-Jantsch 1999: 145 (distr.). Cigliano et al. 2000: 88 (distr, ecol.).

    Holotype of A. vitticollis.— A male in STOCKHOLM, labeled “Sao Leopoldo” Stahl”. Sao Leopoldo is a town in the Brazilian State of Rio Grande do Sul. There is a long-winged female of the species in VIENNA, that might be a paratype, from “Montevideo”, labeled as Aleuas vitticollis. Holotype of Aleuas brachypterus: a male in WASHINGTON, with Bruner's label with the name of the species and the word “Cotype”. Also another label “Sapucay, Paraguay, WTF, March, 85” [WTF stands for W.T. Foster]. Bruner (1906: 668) mentions a female specimen in his collection, and 3 males and 3 females in the U.S. Nat. Museum. I have been unable to find the mentioned female specimens. However, to these short-winged females is due the specific name. Long-winged specimens (like the type of A.vitticollis) were rare in the populations I have examined and collected, while the short-winged ones made up the bulk of the population.

    This species has been collected in Argentina: Misiones, Santa Fe, Entre Ríos, Buenos Aires. Brasil: Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul. Paraguay: (east). Uruguay: (whole country). Distribution in Argentina and Brasil must be far larger than that indicated above.

    Appendix II. Tables of measurements.

    Table 1.

    Aleuas albinae n. sp. Measurements in tenths of a mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-ta01.gif

    Table 2.

    Aleuas curtipennis Bruner. Measurements in tenths of a mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-ta02.gif

    Table 3.

    Aleuas gracilis Stål. Measurements in tenths of a mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-ta03.gif

    Table 4.

    Aleuas lineatus Stål. Measurements in tenths of a mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-ta04.gif

    Table 5.

    Aleuas paraguayensis n. sp. Measurements in tenths of a mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-ta05.gif

    Table 6.

    Aleuas paranensis n. sp. Measurements in tenths of a mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-ta06.gif

    Table 7.

    Aleuas uruguayensis n. sp. Measurements in tenths of a mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-ta07.gif

    Table 8.

    Aleuas vitticollis Stål. Measurements in tenths of a mm.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-ta08.gif

    Appendix III.

    Geographical coordinates of localities of collection.

    i1082-6467-17-1-1-ta301.gif
    Carlos S. Carbonell "The genus Aleuas (Acrididae, Copiocerinae, Aleuasini)," Journal of Orthoptera Research 17(1), 1-27, (1 June 2008). https://doi.org/10.1665/1082-6467(2008)17[1:TGASAC]2.0.CO;2
    Accepted: 1 January 2008; Published: 1 June 2008
    JOURNAL ARTICLE
    27 PAGES


    SHARE
    ARTICLE IMPACT
    Back to Top