Translator Disclaimer
1 July 2010 Does Bird Predation Enhance the Impact of Green Muscle® (Metarhizium acridum) used for Grasshopper Control?
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

A study at Khelcom, Central Senegal, from September 2008 till June 2009 tested two different dose rates (25 and 50 g conidia/ha) of the mycoinsecticide Green Muscle® (Metarhizium acridum) and an untreated control, against grasshoppers in a field trial on nine 400-ha plots in three blocks. The study area was a deforested sylvo-pastoral reserve, 12.5% cultivated, whereas the remainder was fallow or grassland in succession. Grasshopper densities were calculated by executing transect and quadrat counts on plots. The grasshopper community structure was assessed by systematic sweep-net sampling on plots. From these data grasshopper biomass on plots was calculated for each sampling date. Bird numbers were counted on the same transects by the Distance Sampling technique and their densities calculated from Effective Strip Widths (ESW). Energetic requirements of individual bird species were calculated from digestibility-corrected Field Metabolic Rates (FMRs) and for acridivorous species their daily intake of grasshoppers was calculated. Grasshopper densities were very high, with up to 90 ind./m2 in September and 30–35 ind./m2 in October. Numbers and biomass decreased on treated plots as grasshoppers became infected, and remained significantly different from control plots for three months (until January). The relative importance of grasshopper consumption by birds increased between October (high grasshopper densities) and December (medium densities) from an initial 0.06 (±0.03) %/day to a ceiling of 1.6 (±0.9)% per day. Total grasshopper removal during the dry season was 70 %, whereas during the rainy season this was < 1%. Birds specifically captured large and medium-bodied grasshoppers, but rarely small-bodied species, whose numbers initially increased. These findings were corroborated by field observations and by analysis of regurgitated pellet contents of Montagu's Harriers, i.e., small-bodied grasshoppers were only 1.4 – 2.6% of all grasshoppers taken, whereas they constituted 61 – 68% of random samples from the field. Densities of acridivorous Palaearctic migratory birds, in particular White Stork, Ciconia ciconia, Montagu's Harrier, Circus pygargus and Lesser Kestrel, Falco naumanni, were very high and unprecedented elsewhere. Their numbers largely exceeded the 1% criterion for international importance.

Introduction

Locust and grasshopper control in the Sahel still heavily relies on chemical insecticides. During the 2003–05 Desert Locust, Schistocerca gregaria, upsurge in western and northern Africa, over 13 million liters of organophosphate and pyrethroid compounds were used, but no biopesticides (Brader et al. 2006). This is surprising because the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium acridum, formerly M. anisopliae var. acridum (Bischoff et al. 2009) (Green Muscle®, further GM) has been commercially available for operational use since 1999 (Lomer 1999) and has been assessed for use against Desert Locust at a dose rate of 50 g conidia (spores)/ha (PRG 2004). Its use in locust control has meanwhile been recommended by the FAO (Magor 2007, FAO 2009) and it obtained full registration from the “Comité Sahélien des Pesticides” (CSP-CILSS) in nine Sahelian countries in January 2010.

Despite the recommendations and registration, there is still very little operational use of GM in Africa because users a) consider the time lag before the onset of mortality as a constraint, b) find its price prohibitive at the recommended dose rate, c) consider the temperature dependency as a drawback and d) consider current oil-based formulations (OF) as too rapidly deteriorating under prevalent field conditions (e.g., van der Valk 2007).

Meanwhile, it has been shown that the dose rate of GM in grasshopper control can be reduced to 25 g conidia/ha (Mullié & Guèye 2009) without compromising efficacy, making it directly competitive with chemical insecticides. Following these results, the Senegalese Crop Protection Directorate used GM successfully in 2009 in ca 50% of its treatments against the Senegalese Grasshopper Oedaleus senegalensis at a dose rate of 25 g/ha (Khalifa Ndour, DPV Dakar, pers. comm.). New formulations with longer shelf-lives have also been tested and found to perform very well against Desert Locust under operational conditions (Ould Mohamed 2009).

Natural predation of locusts and grasshoppers by vertebrates can be so important that (chemical) control by man becomes redundant (Mullié 2009). Nevertheless, predation is rarely if ever considered in the decision-making processes applied to locust and grasshopper control.

The effect of entomopathogens on the predator-prey relationship is completely different from that of chemical insecticides. In a study design very much comparable with ours described hereafter, but by using the organophosphorous compounds fenitrothion and chlorpyrifos at two different dose rates, Mullié & Keith (1993a) found that apart from direct mortality of 2–7% of the avian community due to anticholinesterase poisoning, bird numbers on transects decreased significantly by as much as 50% following treatments and colonies of Buffalo Weavers, Bubalornis albirostris, were deserted. This was caused by the impact of the organophosphates on nontarget arthropods such that insectivores faced an immediate depletion of their food resources (Mullié & Keith 1991, 1993a, 1993b).

Biopesticides do not kill immediately, as the pathogens need time to develop after insects become infected (Langewald et al. 1999). Because mycopesticides are very selective, no impact on nontarget species occurs (Lomer 1999, Peveling et al. 1999, Mullié & Guèye 2009) and birds neither leave sprayed areas, nor do they become intoxicated. Instead, there are indications that their numbers may temporarily increase (Mullié 2007). The insects become sluggish, and an easy prey for birds, when basking to induce behavioral fever, i.e., by altered thermoregulatory behavior raising body temperature in reaction to infection by a pathogen (Blanford et al. 1998). There is indeed field evidence of synergy between the impact of entomopathogens and predation (Cheke et al. 2006a, 2006b; Mullié 2007), but this has never been tested experimentally.

The current article addresses the question of whether birds do indeed enhance the impact of M. acridum and if so, to what extent and under which conditions. Medium sized plots (400 ha) were sprayed with GM in a field trial and grasshopper and bird densities monitored over an 8-mo period posttreatment. Grasshopper consumption by birds over time was calculated for each of the treatments, based on energetic requirements and compared to available grasshopper biomass. Grasshopper removal rates were assessed to compare treatments.

Methods

Study area.— The study took place from September 2008 until June 2009 at Khelcom, also known under the name of Mbégué, central Senegal (lat 14°28′- 14°43′ N, long 15°22′ - 15°36′W).

Between 1991 and 2004, 55,400 ha (as measured by GPS) out of the 73,000 ha Mbégué Sylvo-pastoral Reserve was gradually deforested to allow for groundnut production. However, in 2008 the total cultivated area was only 12.5%, of which about 60% consisted of groundnut and the rest of millet and some smaller surface areas that were grown with crops such as maize, tapioca and sesame. Typically, a field cultivated with groundnut would be sown with millet during the following rainy season one year later, and thereafter left fallow for one or more years. As a consequence, Khelcom is now a mosaic of cropland, fallow and never-cultivated but deforested land, in various stages of succession, mainly with the shrub Guiera senegalensis (‘Nger’ in Wolof) and regrowth of Combretum glutinosum (‘Rat’).

Of special mention is the liana Leptadenia hastata (‘Thiakhat’). This evergreen plant, forming large green patches in an otherwise barren environment, harbors reproducing Pyrgomorphidae throughout the dry season, and is also exploited by other grasshopper species, most notably Cryptocatantops haemorrhoidalis, Metaxymecus gracilipes, Diabolocatantops axillaris and Heteracris annulosa. Hence stands of L. hastata are often favored by acridivorous birds during the dry season.

Except for 15 so-called Daras (small settlements each housing up to several hundred children who receive religious training and labor in the surrounding fields), there are no other permanent dwellings in the area. There are, however, dozens of temporary camps inhabited by seminomadic herders.

Wildfires occur annually at Khelcom between November and the end of the dry season. In Fig. 1, a map of Khelcom is given showing the layout of our experimental plots and of the areas being burnt.

Floristic composition.—The floristic composition of the study plots was assessed from the diagonals which also served as transects for counts of grasshoppers and birds (Fig. 1). In the middle of each subtransect of 100 m the herbs present on a 10×10-m quadrat were identified with Berhaut (1967), Terry (1993) and Sankara (2008), and their coverage (%), height (cm) and the percentage of bare soil noted. Trees and shrubs present were identified with von Maydell (1990) and counted on a 100 × 100-m bloc and their height and number noted.

Meteorology.—Data on rainfall, wind, temperature and relative humidity were obtained from the National Meteorological Station at Touba Khelcom (lat 14°34′N, long 15°30′W; Mr Moussa Sy, National Meteorological Service, Khelcom, pers. comm.) situated in the middle of our study area, Fig. 1. Ambient temperatures (T, ° C) and relative humidity (RH, %) values were also recorded with Hobo® Pro Series (Onset Computer Corporation, USA, 1998) weather recorders, placed on the ground in the center of each of our plots. The latter observations were believed to provide the best meteorological information of the grasshopper environment and thus for the action of the entomopathogen.

Plots and treatments.—Nine plots of 2 by 2 km, 400 ha per plot, in three blocks of three plots each were delimited. Each block, coded P, Q and R, received three replicate treatments of 0 g (control; P3, Q3, R1), 25 g (P1, Q1, R3) and 50 g (P2, Q2, R2) conidia of M. acridum (strain IMI 330189) per hectare. Plots were at least one kilometer apart to avoid contamination during treatments (Fig. 1).

GM was available in two OF formulations, respectively with 2.5 and 1.25 × 1013 conidia/l and was mixed in a 1:10 ratio with diesel fuel prior to treatment. Samples of the formulations before mixing were analyzed for viability and concentration of conidia. After calibration plots were treated with four Micronair™ AU 8115 rotary atomizers (Micron Sprayers Ltd, UK) mounted on four four-wheel drive pick-up vehicles, operating simultaneously at a speed of 10 km/h, with a track spacing of 50 m, dose rate of 1 l/ha and a flow rate of 833 ml/min. Treatments took place between 9 and 11 October 2008 from 8 till 11 AM and again from 4 till 7 PM. To prevent clogging of the spray system by conidia, filters and hoses of all Micronairs were cleaned repeatedly after several passes.

Deposition of droplets was measured in the center of each of the spray plots by placing oil-sensitive papers over a length of 600 m perpendicular to the spray paths and facing the wind at 15-m intervals, 60 cm above ground level.

Grasshopper availability.—Two monitoring periods were distinguished. A period of intensive monitoring was applied from 4 d before until 18 d after treatment, at three-day intervals, during the month of October 2008. Extensive monitoring (once a month) was applied from November 2008 until May 2009, with the exception of April, when no observations were made. In September, three more series of counts, respectively at 20, 18 and 14 d pretreatment, were made in nine other plots in the same study area, which were to be sprayed aerially. We will also refer to some of the data obtained from these plots.

All observations were done on transects. One of the 2800-m long diagonals of each plot, usually SE-NW, in a few cases NE-SW (Fig. 1), was divided in three transects of 700 m, starting at 250 m from the corner of the plot, with a 100-m buffer between successive transects and again 250 m at the end of the third transect. Each transect was divided in seven subtransects of 100 m to facilitate observations and to differentiate observations spatially. Observations on subsequent transects within the same plot were considered as being independent.

Fig. 1.

Map of the Khelcom study area. Squares are study plots with diagonals indicating transects and flashes (arrows) indicating the direction of the counts. Codes of plots sharing the same letter (P, Q and R) are in the same block. Hatchings are areas that were burnt during the study.

f01_139.eps

Density.—During the intensive monitoring period, two observers walked on either side of the transects, starting at about one to two hours after sunrise. On each subtransect of 100 m, and spaced at 20-m intervals, five open quadrats of 1 m2 were selected at random and total number of grasshoppers (nymphs plus imagos) counted. For each subtransect of 700 m this produced 35 observations or 105 observations for each plot. The densities for the two observers were averaged for each paired quadrat and these figures used in calculations.

During the extensive monitoring, counts were done by a single observer. As it was anticipated that grasshopper densities and proportion of nymphs would drop during the dry season, making the use of quadrat counts inappropriate, during the last count of the intensive monitoring period, both quadrat and full-transect counts (Cressman 2001) were executed successively on the same transects. All grasshoppers seen within 50 cm on either side of the walked track were counted and totals for each subtransect of 100 m were noted. Average numbers per m2 (x) were subsequently regressed against average numbers counted by the quadrat method (y) on the same subtransect. To make counts during both periods comparable, the regression equation (y = 1.0905x; r2 = 0.9388) was used to convert densities counted by transect counts into densities calculated by the quadrat method during the period of intensive monitoring.

Community structure.—As the transect counts did not produce information on individual species, after each count insects were captured with sweep nets. Over the entire diagonal, between the 250-m limits from each corner, on three repetitions each of 150 m, grasshoppers were captured in a way as representative as possible: to assure representation of the various habitats available on the plot and to assure the capture of “difficult” stages, such as first instars (less mobile, difficult to capture when on the ground) and such as adults of the larger grasshoppers, the latter particularly difficult when temperatures were elevated and imagos were highly mobile. To reduce variability among samples and dates and to standardize sampling, the capture continued until at least 500 individuals per plot were trapped during each sampling. To prevent interaction with counts, grasshoppers were captured on an imaginary line which was ca 100 m away from and parallel to the transects.

Grasshopper imagos were identified with Lecoq (1979, 1988, 2008) Mestre (1988) Launois & Launois-Luong (1989) and Launois-Luong & Lecoq (1989). If necessary they were compared to specimens in the reference collection of the Crop Protection Directorate. Nymphs were identified with Popov (1989).

Biomass. —A subsample of the grasshoppers captured for establishing community structure, to which were added individuals captured between September and December 2009 during a follow-up study on the same plots, was used to take both fresh and dry body masses to calculate grasshopper biomass.

Bird numbers.—The same transects and subtransects used for grasshopper counts (see under grasshopper availability) were used for bird counts. As birds were most active in the first hours of daylight and grasshoppers only after they had increased their body temperatures, the onset of bird counts on transects preceded those of grasshoppers, usually starting within the first hour after sunrise. The only exception was when heavy rains prevented an early start. We believe this did not influence the quality and comparability of the counts, as all three observers had the same delays and birds usually exhibited a peak of activity immediately following rains.

As the observers had only basic experience in field ornithology and in estimating distances, the senior author organized a three-day intensive practical training course in the field prior to the onset of the study. Individual performances, both on visual identification and by sound, were tested at the end of the training to assure that the most important and/or most common species could be properly identified. In the course of the monitoring period these training sessions were repeated several times to account for species having newly arrived, e.g., Palaearctic-African migrants. Forvisual identification of birds Brown et al. (1982), Urban et al. (1986, 1997), Fry et al. (1988, 2000), Keith et al. (1992) and Borrow & Demey (2001) were used. For identification of bird song the CD collections of Chappuis (2000) and Barlow et al. (2002) were used.

To standardize counts temporally (monitoring per plot) and spatially (comparison with other plots), each subtransect of 100 m was counted in 5 min.(cf. Mullié & Keith 1993a), or 35 min per transect. All birds that could be seen with the naked eye or heard at unlimited distance on either side of the transect, were noted on field forms. Binoculars (8×40, 10×40) were used to identify species that otherwise were too distant to be properly identified, or to distinguish between similar species. It was decided not to apply a maximum observation distance à priori, because otherwise the sample of raptors and storks might become too small. However, during analysis (see under statistics) observation width was sometimes limited à posteriori.

For each observation, i.e., a single bird or a group of two or more individuals close together, the number and the distance perpendicular to the transect was noted, according to the methodology of distance sampling (Buckland et al. 1993). Nonidentified species were noted with a description. In many cases these species could later be identified. The Distance software (Thomas et al. 2006) allows for a calculation of true densities, as it accounts for the probability of detection: small or secretive species will only be observed at rather short distances, whereas flocks, large species or species with a conspicuous behavior tend to be noticed at larger distances.

Grasshopper consumption by birds.—Based on existing knowledge of the food and feeding behavior of the bird species present on our transects (cf. Morel & Morel 1978, Mullié & Keith 1993a, Mullié 2009), as well as on the basis of visual observations during the study, on gizzard contents of birds found dead, e.g., as road victims in our study area, and on the contents of regurgitated pellets (see also next paragraph) collected in roosts of communal species such as White Stork, Montagu's Harrier and Lesser Kestrel, Falco naumanni, observed species were classified as acridivorous or nonacridivorous.

As the total observation period, from September till June, included both a part of the rainy season and the major part of the dry season, some species were present in only a part of this period. Certain species such as the Village Weaver, nested and fed their young with insect prey. During the dry season they became granivorous. The Village Weaver is considered as one of the principal predators in Senegal of the Senegalese grasshopper Oedaleus senegalensis during the rainy season (Axelsen et al. 2009). Other common species, such as the Singing Bushlark, Mirafra cantillans, and the White-billed Buffalo Weaver, are acridivorous during the rainy season, feeding themselves and their young with grasshoppers (Mullié & Keith 1993), but become granivorous during the dry season (pers. obs. WCM). Other species may change the proportion of grasshopper prey in their diet throughout the season. As yet, we do not have sufficient information to estimate accurately for each species which proportion of its diet consists of grasshoppers throughout the year.

To be on the conservative side, we assume here that the diet of any species considered to be acridivorous does not consist by more than 50 % of grasshopper prey, even if we know for certain species (Montagu's Harrier, Lesser Kestrel; Mullié 2009) or suspect for others (White Stork, Abyssinian Roller, Coracias abyssinica, Woodchat Shrike, Lantus senator) (this study) that the proportion by weight of grasshoppers in their diet may be as high as 80–90%. Furthermore we follow Axelsen et al. (2009) that any breeding granivorous species only feeds on grasshoppers during the rainy season and from November onwards only feeds on grains.

Individual field metabolic rates (FMRs) of birds were calculated by using an allometric analysis of log-log transformed data of fresh body mass (Mb) in g and FMR in kJ/day of 229 vertebrate species (p<0.007, F1,227=547;FMR=2.25Mb0.808) (Nagy2005). A database was developed in Excel (Microsoft Inc.) containing for each record, along with bird species name, number observed and distance, information on bird body mass, FMR, FMR corrected for food digestibility, effective strip width (ESW; see under statistics), origin (Palaearctic or Afro-tropical) and detection probability (Table 1). From these data, bird densities/km2 and their grasshopper consumption were calculated.

To estimate the percentage of grasshopper biomass taken daily by the acridivorous bird community, the calculated daily consumption (kg DM/km2) was divided by the calculated daily total biomass of grasshoppers present + daily consumption (kg DM/km2) and multiplied by 100.

Food remains in regurgitated pellets.—Only data on pellet contents from Montagu's Harriers became available during the study; data from other species will be published elsewhere. All Montagu's Harriers feeding in Khelcom used up to 4 communal roosts within the area. During the extensive monitoring period regurgitated pellets were randomly collected in the roosts (ca 100 pellets per roost and pervisit), individually wrapped in plastic foil and labelled for future analysis and identification of the prey remains. As the main orthopteran remains in pellets are mandibles, a key had to be developed to identify individual species (Franck Noel, in prep.), taking into account the wear of the mandibles (cf. Chapman 1964, Zouhourian-Saghiri et al. 1983, Gangwere & Spiller 1995, Smith & Capinera 2005). Prey remains per pellet were counted (using maxima of left or right mandibles, tibiae, femurs, and other identifiable parts) and biomass of grasshoppers calculated from data in Appendix 1.

Statistics: grasshopper densities.—Count data were log transformed before analysis. Because data were not independent in time, a BACI (Before-After-Control-Impact) design was applied (Stewart-Oaten et al. 1986). In this design, the effect parameter [Log (n+1)treated - Log (n+1)control]before was tested against [Log(n+1)treated - Log(n+1)control]after* It was thus implicitly assumed that the log difference of ‘to be treated’ and control plots was constant in time before treatments and that any change in this ratio, after spraying of GM, was caused by a treatment effect.

Statistics: bird densities.—The results from the transect counts were analyzed with the software Distance 5.0, release 2 (Thomas et al. 2006). For each individual species (for common species) or group of species (for less common species) Effective Strip Width (ESW) was calculated, a measure that depends on the probability of detecting a bird. To obtain a larger sample size, the less-common species were grouped into three categories: from 1 (low) to 3 (high) probability of detection. These categories corresponded approximately with detection distances of 0–100 m (1), 0–200 m (2) and 0->400 m (3). For about half the number of bird species, a Hazard Rate model was used to calculate ESW, for the others a Half-normal with Cosine Expansion model. The chosen observation interval was manual in half of the cases and automatic in the others, whereas truncation of observation distance was applied in most cases to allow for a better fit of the chosen model. Details are given in Table 1.

To transform count data into densities, the following formula was applied: Density (ind./km2) = number counted / (2 × 2.1 × ESW). In this formula the factor 2 corrects for the two sides of the transect counted and the factor 2.1 is the total length in km of the three subtransects per plot. As an example we can take 9 Singing Bush-larks counted on a plot, which would give a density of 9/(2 × 2.1 × 0.0326) = 65.73 ind./km2. Calculated densities were neither corrected for breeding females nor for nestlings, as was done by Axelsen et al. (2009).

Table 1.

Information on body mass, (corrected) field metabolic rates (FMR), origin, detection probabilities, effective strip width (ESW) and model parameters used in calculations of species considered as acridivorous during at least a part of the study period.

t01_139.gif

Fig. 2.

Daily and cumulative rainfall (mm) during the 2008 rainy season at Touba Khelcom.

f02_139.eps

Treatment effects were analyzed by Repeated Measures ANOVA (SPSS, v. 13.0; SPPS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, LISA). Missing values on day-1 for plots R1 and R2 were obtained by interpolation of count data on days -4 and +3.

Results

Detailed information on the quality and efficacy of the treatments, droplet deposition, germination and persistence of conidia of M. acridum and of meteorological conditions during treatments is given elsewhere (Mullié & Guèye 2009) and will be summarized here. Germination of spores just prior to the first treatments was 93.6 (±1.8) % (n=14) in the 500 g/l formulation and 92.4 (±2.5) % (n=17) in the 250 g/l formulation (SenBiotech in litt.). Droplet distribution was regular and similar on all treated plots, with an average of 13 droplets/cm2. Efficacy of treatments, corrected according-to Henderson-Tilton (1955) for grasshopper counts on control plots, was 83.8–87.1%. Median Lethal Times (MLT) were 8.24 (95% CL 5.97–10.07) and 8.19 (95% CL 6.58–9.74) days and LT80 values were 15.85 (95% CL 11.99–28.00) and 13.06 (95% CL 10.93–17.11) days respectively for 25 and 50 g/ha, with no differences between the two dose rates. The maximum effect of GM was between 6 and 12 d posttreatment. Mortality of >90% due to Metarhizium infection (confirmed by sporulation) of untreated grasshoppers placed in persistence cages on treated plots for 72 h, showed that M. acridum activity persisted for at least 18 d post treatment.

Fig. 3.

Average daily minimum and maximum temperatures (n=7) at ground level in study plots at Khelcom in October 2008.

f03_139.eps

Meteorological conditions.—Daily and cumulative rainfall during the 2008 rainy season are given in Fig. 2. Minimum and maximum daily temperatures at ground level during October are given in Fig. 3. The 2008 rainy season at Khelcom was characterized by extremely wet conditions and a cumulative rainfall of 935 mm, which is well above normal and approximately twice the annual amount of the past 20 y in the same area. No rains were recorded during treatments and the following period of intensive monitoring. The interval of minimum and maximum daily temperatures during treatments and thereafter was favorable for a rapid development of M. acridum, as the optimum ambient temperature range for the pathogen development is between 24 and 38°C (C. Kooyman, FAES Dakar, pers. comm.).

Floristic composition.—Average shrub density in our plots was 17.9 shrubs/ha and consisted of G. senegalensis, C. glutinosum, Balanites aegyptica, Calotropis procera, Cassia occidentalis and Bauhinia rufescens. Tree density was 1.3 trees/ha, the commonest tree being C. glutinosum. Locally stands of Baobabs, Adansonia digitata, had been saved to provide shade for man and livestock. More rarely Tamarindus indica, Piliostigma reticulatum, Mitragyna inermis (in temporary flooded depressions), Acacia (Faidherbia) albida or Sterculia setigera were still present. The few remaining trees are heavily exploited for firewood and browse.

The herbaceous layer was mainly composed of Gramineae, such as Andropogon sp., Cenchrus biflorus (‘Cram cram’), Ctenium elegans, Eragrostis tremula, E. tenella and Digitaria sp. Adventives such as Mitracarpus villosus and Spermacoce (Borreria) radiata dominated on sites which had been cultivated in recent years.

Wildfires.—In November 6046 ha of Khelcom was burnt, whereas throughout the dry season, but in particular during April-May, an additional 1307 ha fell prey to wildfires, making a total of 13.4 % of Khelcom being burnt during the study. Some of our plots were partially affected by the fires. Based on our monitoring, this concerned 5.3% of the transects in November, 13.2% from December till March and 18.0% in May.

Grasshopper densities.—Immediately prior to treatments, average densities of grasshoppers (all stages confounded) were between 30 and 35 ind./m2 in all plots (Fig. 4). At the end of second decade of September (not shown in Fig. 4), three weeks prior to treatments, average densities of 90 ind./m2 were even recorded. Densities remained at pretreatment levels in the control plots until 15 d posttreatment, after which date they gradually decreased due to natural factors related to the end of the rainy season.

Fig. 4.

Average density of grasshoppers (ind./m2) per treatment in time. Bars indicate Standard Errors.

f04_139.eps

Starting from day 6 after treatment, grasshopper densities in both the 25 and 50 g/ha treated plots decreased rapidly as a result of exposure to M. acridum conidia, which was confirmed by sporulation of M. acridum on caged individuals.

Grasshopper numbers remained low in treated plots and were statistically different from densities in control plots until 74 d after treatment. Only from 109 d posttreatment onwards (January), densities on all plots were no longer different from each other (Fig. 4).

Grasshopper community structure.—In total, 79,480 grasshoppers were captured and identified. The grasshopper community consisted of at least 32 species. In addition, 5 taxa could only be identified to the genus level and at least one or more species remained unidentified. The latter category was only 0.3 % of the total number captured. For 31 species and seven stages (adult and 6 larval stages) fresh body mass (WW, n=1731) and dry body mass (DW, n=908) were taken (Appendix 1). For species and stages for which only fresh body masses were available, these were multiplied by 0.3 to obtain DW values (based on Appendix 1; n=908, ratio DW/WW=0.295). For two rarely captured species lacking field information on body mass (Aiolopus simulatrix and Homoxyrrhepes punctipennis), a regression analysis was obtained from body length vs DW of the captured specimens and the regression equation applied to body-length data from the literature (Mestre 1988), to calculate corresponding DW (imagos only).

On the basis of numbers captured, the Senegalese grasshopper Oedaleus senegalensis (producing diapausing eggs at the end of the rainy season) dominated during the rainy season (58–66%), and was absent from February onwards. Species with diapausing adults or continuous reproduction were present during the entire period (Fig. 5). Numerically the most important species were Acorypha clara, Acrotylus blondeli, Ornithacris cavroisi, Pyrgomorpha cognata complex and P. vignaudi. These species, together with O. senegalensis, comprised 75–85 % of grasshopper numbers in the community at any moment.

On the basis of body mass, the situation is slightly different. O. senegalensis dominated during the rainy season (47%), followed by O. cavroisi (14%), Acorypha glaucopsis (9%) and A. clara (7%).These four species represented 77% of the grasshopper community. During the dry season, from December onwards, O. cavroisi (53%) A. clara (23%) and Diaolocatantops axillaris (6 %), represented 82% of the grasshopper community by biomass. From December onwards Catantopinae (D. axillaris, Harpezocatantops stylifer, Catantops stramineus, Cyptocatantops haemorhoidalis) and Pyrgomorphidae replaced species laying diapausing eggs (O. senegalensis, A. glaucopsis). In Fig. 6, the grasshopper biomass in time in kg DW/km2 is given.

Fig. 5.

Densities (ind./m2) overtime of the grasshopper Community according to life history strategy.

f05_139.eps

Birds.—During transect counts, 83 bird species were identified. Of these, 42 were classified as acridivorous, at least during a part of the time (Table 1). In Table 1, details are also given on the various parameters used for calculating densities. Tables with detailed count results per plot and per species can be found in Mullié & Guèye (2009) and are summarized in Appendix 2.

The bird community consisted of a mix of Palaearctic-African (all migratory) and afro-tropical (both migratory and resident) species. Consequently, during the course of the study some species arrived, while others left our study area.

Fig. 6.

Average grasshopperbiomass (kg DW/km2) over time per the three treatments. Bars indicate Standard Errors.

f06_139.eps

Commensalistic feeding associations were common and contributed to an efficient removal of grasshoppers from plots. Species implicated were White-billed Buffalo Weaver, White-throated Bee-eater Merops albicollis, White Stork, Lesser Kestrel, Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis (Fig. 7) and Abyssinian Roller.

The results from the repeated measures ANOVA applied to acridivorous bird species on transects, showed a significant time effect (F=8.582, df=4.562 (Huynh-Feldt correction), p<0.001) but independent of treatment (N.S.): bird numbers gradually increased overtime on all plots, with no differences between treatments (Mullié & Guèye 2009).

Although bird numbers were not influenced by treatments, absolute grasshopper consumption by birds increased on all plots, whereas daily removal rates increased on treated plots only. From day -4 until day 6, treated and control plots were not different. Starting from day 9 until day 18, daily removal of the available grasshopper biomass on treated plots increased tenfold from 0.04–0.08% to 0.48%, whereas grasshopper consumption on control plots remained at a low 0.03–0.04% daily removal in the same period (Fig. 8).

The increase of grasshopper removal was due to a combination of two factors. Firstly, and most importantly, GM treatments caused a strong reduction of grasshopper densities, while densities of acridivorous birds did not significantly change. Secondly, although acridivorous bird densities remained in the same order of magnitude, the species composition changed due to migration, with generally heavier migrant species such as Montagu's and Marsh Harriers (C. aeruginosus) arriving and smaller species such as White-throated Bee-eaters and Woodland Kingfishers (Halcyon senegalensis) leaving (Appendix 2).

From 18 till 74 d posttreatment, treated and control plots remained significantly different. In this period both removal rates and consumption continue to increase, as more and heavier bird species arrived, White Storks in particular. From January (day 109) onwards, grasshopper removal rates level off at 1.58 (±0.25)% daily removal and are no longer different between treatments.

To verify the validity of our approach, we also calculated grasshopper removal from monthly decreases in densities on control plots from December onwards (interval between dashed lines in Fig. 8). Control plots were taken to avoid confounding factors such as a prolonged mortality due to persistence of viable M. acridum conidia. The results are very much in agreement with the calculations based on enegetic requirements, although the grasshopper removal rate is slightly lower at 1.07 (±0.63)%.

As the community structure data did not provide any evidence for major grasshopper immigration to or emigration from the plots from December onwards, it was assumed that population declines on plots in this period were mainly resulting from predation. The daily population decline, as calculated by regression analysis on Log n ind./m2 (y) in time (x): (y=-0.0882x + 0.7427, r2=0.9304; ANOVA: df=524, F=7.097, p=0.008; Fig. 9) showed that the rate of decrease of grasshopper densities between December and May was constant. In December, average densities had fallen to below 5 ind./m2.

The composition of the bird community changed considerably during the course of the study. During the rainy season it consisted of about 90% acridivores, dropping to ca 10% in May (Fig. 10). However, this change was not caused by decreasing densities of acridivorous birds ((ANOVA; df=9, F= 1.671, N.S.), but by a very strong increase of granivorous species during the dry season, most notably Golden Sparrows (ANOVA; df=9, F=48.456, p<0.001).

Pellet contents.—Based on numbers of prey items recovered from Montagu's Harrier pellets in the period January to March, grasshoppers constitute 87.4–91.0% of the diet, whereas on the basis of biomass, they constitute 51.0–61.0% (Mullié & Koks unpub. data). In Table 2, recovered grasshopper species are given from high to low body mass. The harriers do not take grasshoppers proportionally to their occurrence (χ2 (13, n=1623) = 3701.04, p< 0.0001). Common species (i.e., > ca 5% of the community) with a body mass > 0.73g are taken significantly more often than smaller species. The latter represent only 1.4–2.6% of all grasshoppers being taken by the harriers, whereas they represent 61–68% of the grasshopper community in the field.The three preferred prey species in order of importance are Acorypha clara (57–65%), Ornithacris cavroisi (23–26%) and Diabolocatantops axillaris (9–15%).

Fig. 7.

Cattle Egret with Acorypha clara as prey. Cattle Egrets, Bubulcus ibis, often in commensalistic feeding associations with Lesser Kestrels, Falco naumanni, exploited medium-sized grasshoppers in green patches of the liana Leptadenia hastata.

f07_139.eps

Discussion

The 2008 rainy season at Khelcom was characterized by exceptionally abundant rainfall (935 mm) and very high grasshopper densities (up to 90 ind./m2 in September, 30–35 in October) showing a low mobility. This low mobility can be explained by the presence of a well-developed herbaceous layer, due to abundant rainfall and by the absence of favorable winds at the right moment for the second generation of the Senegalese Grasshopper to migrate north (J. Bak, National Environmental Research Institute, DMU, Denmark, pers. comm.). This resulted in two subsequent generations of O. senegalensis reproducing at Khelcom, leading to very high densities. The treatments with GM were executed against a population of O. senegalensis of which adults predominantly belonged to the second generation, and nymphs to the third generation.

The composition of the grasshopper community, consisting of 32+ species, was dominated numerically by the Senegalese grasshopper (58–66%) before treatments and during the intensive monitoring period at the end of the rainy season, but in terms of both numbers and biomass, species with diapausing adults such as O. cavroisi and A. clara, were common throughout the entire study period (Fig. 5). Their continuous presence is likely the main reason that they form an important part of the diets of many acridivorous birds (Mullié 2009). Nymphs were the dominant life-form until mid-October. Starting from December onwards, only nymphs of continuously reproducing species were present.

Fig. 8.

Average percentage of the grasshopper community (by weight) removed per day per treatment by acridivorous birds. Bars indicate Standard Errors. The dashed lines indicate minimum and maximum biomass reduction, based on the difference in availability on successive monitoring dates. The time scale changes in the middle of the x-axis. See text for further explanation.

f08_139.eps

In recent years Khelcom has become an important reproduction area for an array of grasshopper species, some of which are important pests to rain-fed agriculture. Until 1991, Khelcom was part of the 73,000-ha protected Mbégué Sylvo-Pastoral Reserve, of which 55,400 ha were gradually cleared until 2004 to make way for groundnut production. Grasshopper problems were unknown from the area before 1991 (data from Crop Protection Directorate). The resulting mosaic of cropped areas (not exceeding 12.5% of the surface area during the study), fallow and cleared land and partially regenerating former forest, has become an ideal habitat for grasshopper development. This in turn has attracted acridivorous bird species, such as Montagu's Harrier, characteristic for areas rather low in the succession cycle. Numbers of Montagu's Harriers that use Khelcom either for foraging or as a night roost are maximally 5000–6000 individuals (Mullié & Guèye 2009). These numbers are unprecedented elsewhere and are among the highest recorded anywhere in the world (Clarke 1996). They constitute about 16% of the population of about 37,000 individuals estimated to migrate via Spain to the African mainland (B. Koks, SWGK, The Netherlands, pers. comm.) and 2% of the entire world population estimated at 300,000 individuals (C. Trierweiler, Groningen University, The Netherlands, in litt.).

Fig. 9.

Decrease in grasshopper densities (Log n ind./m2) on control plots between December and May. Bars indicate Standard Errors.

f09_139.eps

Some of the other acridivorous species reach very high densities, rarely found in such concentrations elsewhere in the Sahel, e.g., White Stork (3,500 ind.; 1.75% of the flyway population) and Lesser Kestrel (5,000; 10%) (Mullié & Guèye 2009). All these species exceed the 1% criterion for areas of international ornithological importance (Ramsar Convention-COP9 2005;  www.ramsar.org/key_criteria) and are protected under the Bonn Convention of which Senegal is signatory (CMS-COP9 2008).

Fig. 10.

Average bird densities (ind./km2) in time according to diet.

f10_139.eps

The consistent data of the temporal composition of the structure of the community supports the hypothesis that grasshopper movements during the entire study period were rather limited and that continuously decreasing densities between December and May were largely caused by predation. They logarithmically decreased (all species combined) from 4.66 ind./m2 in December to 1.51 ind./m2 in May, or a reduction of 67.2%. A constant decrease of grasshoppers due to predation started at densities below ca 5 ind./m2, which can be considered as a medium density. Total grasshopper biomass was reduced from 1,256 kg DW/km2 in December to 352 kg DW/km2 in May, a reduction of 71.9%. Some local displacements, might have occurred as dead grasshoppers, in particular Diabolocatantops axillaris, showing sporulation of M. acridum, were found up to 12km from the nearest treated plots in October and November (Mullié & Guèye 2009), and also the small increase of densities on treated plots between December and January may have been the result of either local redistribution of grasshoppers or of small-scale immigration.

An important finding of this study is that GM did not have an impact on bird numbers and densities; these changed significantly over time, but were unrelated to treatments. [Treatments of grasshoppers with the organophosphates (OPs) chlorpyrifos and fenitrothion in Senegal were shown to have large and significant negative effects on bird displacements, apart from direct mortality and reproduction effects (Mullié & Keith 1993).]

While numbers of acridivorous bird species did not change, their biomass did when heavier migrant species arrived. This increased grasshopper removal rates on all plots, but more steeply on treated plots, because grasshopper densities had already been affected by GM. It is only at 3.5 mo posttreatment that grasshopper removal rates level off and are no longer different from controls. Hence by increasing the duration of the GM impact (Fig. 8), bird predation enhanced its action.

When taking body size into account, we observed that large (O. cavroisi) and medium-bodied (A. clara) species significantly declined, whereas small-bodied species (Pyrgomorphidae) first increased adult population levels, to decline only during the last count. Grasshopper remains from Montagu's Harrier pellets show the same tendency: small bodied grasshoppers (< 0.73 g) represented < 2.6% of the prey by body mass, while they represented 61–68% of the grasshopper community in the field. Montagu's Harriers preyed preferentially on A. clara, O. cavroisi and other medium bodied species such as D. axillaris. [Lesser Kestrels also prey preferentially on O. cavroisi (Mullié 2009).]

Our data also confirm earlier findings of Branson (2005b) who reported that birds reduced the proportion of medium-bodied grasshoppers, while small-bodied grasshoppers increased in abundance. Belovsky & Slade (1993) found a predation-mediated reduction of large-bodied grasshoppers, whereas changes in abundance of medium and small-bodied species that they observed could not be explained by predation.

There was a large difference between grasshopper removal during the rainy season and during the dry season. Because most grasshoppers reproduced between September and November, predation by birds could not be calculated in the same way as during the dry season. Therefore, cumulative daily predation rates were integrated over time (September – November) to obtain an estimate of the total predation during this period. As vegetation development started at the onset of the first significant rains (i.e., > ca 20 mm), which was in mid-June (Fig. 2) and grasshopper reproduction soon afterwards, our data do not cover the entire reproductive period and the importance of predation may have been underestimated. Nevertheless, predation did not remove more than 1% from the community, which can be considered as insignificant. This is in contrast with modelling results presented by Axelsen et al. (2009) that birds reduce O. senegalensis populations in Senegal and Niger during the rainy season by 20–25%. It should be mentioned that bird densities in their study have been corrected for breeding females and for nestlings as well as for reduced reproductive output of the grasshopper population, but this alone does not explain the large difference.

Data from North American studies are much more variable. Predation rates of 30–50% have been reported at low and medium grasshopper densities (Joern 1986, 1992; Fowler et al. 1991; Bock et al. 1992). However, in some cases no measurable effect of predation was present (Joern 2000). Our data are corroborated by those of Branson (2005) who states that bird predation becomes less important at high grasshopper densities, which was also the case during the rainy season in our study. However, when grasshopper densities decreased to medium levels (ca 5 ind./m2), bird predation became very important.

Table 2.

Species composition of grasshoppers captured in the field by sweep-net sampling and found as prey remains in regurgitated pellets of Montagu's Harriers, collected in night roosts, at Khelcom between January and March 2009.

t02_139.gif

The removal of grasshoppers by birds was calculated under some broad assumptions about diet composition (maximum 50% of the diet of acridivorous species supposed to be composed of grasshoppers) and temporal aspects of predation (granivorous species which were known to feed on acridids during their breeding season were supposed not to do so from December onwards). As compared to calculations derived from grasshopper densities in successive months, calculations from bird consumption produced very similar results, supporting the idea that under conditions of less stable grasshopper populations, bird consumption of grasshoppers can be approximated by a few rough assumptions about predation rates, if the densities of acridivorous species have been assessed. The peak in consumption in November and December (days 47–74) in Fig. 8 is due to the presence of large concentrations of White Storks on some of the plots treated with 50 g conidia/ha, which has a strong influence on calculated biomass removal. The shape of the curves of grasshopper removal calculated from monthly biomass reduction (dashed lines in Fig. 8) strongly suggests that White Storks had also been present on control plots, but were not seen during the monthly count.

Commensalism may be an advantageous strategy for feeding on orthopterans in particular, in dense vegetation and at high grasshopper densities. In addition to our observations, Cheke et al. (2006a, b) observed Lanners, Falco biarmicus, exploiting Desert Locust by following men and camels in dense Schouwia thebaica vegetation in Northern Niger and stooping on locusts being flushed. Jensen et al. (2008) very frequently observed Lanners exploiting grasshoppers (probably O. senegalensis) flushed by Abdim's Storks, Ciconia abdimii, in SE Niger. In Waza National Park (Extreme North of Cameroon), Ralph Buij (in litt.) observed Yellow-billed Kites, Milvus parasitus, doing the same when people flushed grasshoppers in high grass. He also observed Northern Carmine Bee-eaters, Merops nubicus, with goats (they also travel on goatbacks) and Arabian Bustards, Ardeotis arbabs, and Piapiacs, Ptilostomus afer, with small livestock, and Abyssinian Rollers with Abdim's Storks at the start of the rains. Only once two adult Montagu's Harriers were observed flying amongst a herd of over 200 cattle catching flushed grasshoppers (Ralph Buij, in litt.).

Deforestation for expansion of groundnut production destroyed the formerly protected forest at Khelcom, reputedly with a high biodiversity (Schoonmaker-Freudenberger 1991). In turn it also created a habitat low in the succession cycle and rich in orthopterans and their predators. Some of them, such as the Montagu's Harrier, are so abundant that their numbers are unprecedented anywhere else in the world. The semi-arid Sahelian agricultural habitat is currently under a severe human pressure (Zwarts et al. 2009) and avian predators in the Sahel have faced a decline of over 90% in the last 30 years (Thiollay 2006a, b). Biopesticides and predators can play a vital role in controlling grasshoppers considered to be a pest to agriculture without compromising agro-ecosystem functioning. Therefore their complementary role should be exploited instead of neglected.

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank the more than 30 people who participated in the field work for this study. The study would not have been possible without the financial support of the Japanese Embassy in Dakar, through the KR2 programme. The Dutch Foundation Working Group Montagu's Harrier (SWGK) contributed financially to the pellet analysis. Special thanks are due to the directors of the Agriculture Directorate, Mr Samba Kanté and Mamadou Diallo, and director of the Crop Protection Directorate, Mrs Mariétou Diawarra for logistic support and for providing human resources. Kemo Badji provided untold assistance during treatments and throughout the intensive monitoring period. We thank Aliou Badji and Kalilou Bodiang who formed part of the team which executed the extensive monitoring, Franck Noel who analyzed the pellets and developed a key for mandible identification and Christiane Trierweiler who gave statistical advice. Helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper were provided by Drs Michel Lecoq, Bo Svenning Petersen, Christiane Trierweiler, Glenn Morris and three anonymous referees. They are kindly acknowledged.

References

1.

J.A. Axelsen , B.S. Petersen , I.H. Maiga , A. Niassy , K. Badji , Z. Ouambama , M. Sønderskov , C. Kooyman 2009. Simulation studies of Senegalese Grasshopper ecosystem interactions II: the role of egg pod predators and birds. International Journal of Pest Management 55: 99–112. Google Scholar

2.

C. Barlow , J. Hammick , P. Sellar 2002. Bird song of The Gambia & Senegal. An aid to identification. Boxed 3 CD set. Mandarin productions, UK. Google Scholar

3.

G. E. Belovsky , J.B. Slade 1993. The role of vertebrate and invertebrate predators in a grasshopper community. Oikos 68: 193–201. Google Scholar

4.

J. Berhaut 1967. Flore du Sénégal, 2e Ed. Editions Clairafrique, Dakar. Google Scholar

5.

J.F. Bischoff , S.A. Rehner , R.A. Humber 2009. A multilocus phylogeny of the Metarhizium anisopliae lineage. Mycology 101: 512–530. Google Scholar

6.

S. Blanford , M.B. Thomas , J. Langewald 1998. Behavioural fever in a population of the Senegalese grasshopper, Oedaleus senegalensis, and its implications for biological control using pathogens. Ecological Entomology 23: 9–14. Google Scholar

7.

C.E. Bock , J.H. Bock , M.C. Grant 1992. Effects of bird predation on grasshopper densities in an Arizona grassland. Ecology 73: 1706–1717. Google Scholar

8.

N. Borrow , R. Demey 2001. Birds of Western Africa. Christopher Helm, London. Google Scholar

9.

L. Brader , H. Djibo , F.G. Faye , S. Ghaout , M. Lazar , P.N. Luzietoso , Babah M.A. Ould 2006. Towards a more effective response to Desert Locusts and their impacts on food security, livelihoods and poverty. Multilateral evaluation of the 2003–05 Desert Locust campaign. FAO, Rome. Google Scholar

10.

D.H. Branson 2005a. Effects of fire on grasshopper assemblages in a northern mixed-grass prairie. Environmental Entomology 34: 1109–1113. Google Scholar

11.

D.H. Branson 2005b. Direct and indirect effects of avian predation on grasshopper communities in northern mixed-grass prairie. Environmental Entomology 34: 1114–1121. Google Scholar

12.

L.H. Brown , E.K. Urban , K. Newman (Eds) 1982. The Birds of Africa. Vol. 1. Academic Press, London. Google Scholar

13.

S.T. Buckland , D.R. Anderson , K.P. Burnham , J.L. Laake 1993. Distance sampling: estimating abundance of biological populations. Chapman and Hall, London. Reprinted 1999 by RUWPA, University of St Andrews, Scotland. Google Scholar

14.

C. Chappuis 2000. African Bird Sounds Vol. 2, West and Central Africa. Boxed 11 CD set, Société d'Etudes Ornithologiques de France, Paris / British Library of Wild Sounds/National Sound Archive, London. Google Scholar

15.

R.A. Cheke , W.C. Mullié , A.B. Ibrahim 2006a. Avian predation of adult Desert Locust Schistocerca gregaria affected by Metarhizium anisopliae vat. acridum (Green Muscle®) during a large scale field trial in Aghéliough, northern Niger, in October and November 2005. NRI, Chatham Maritime; FAO, Dakar. Google Scholar

16.

R.A. Cheke , W.C. Mullié , A.B. Ibrahim 2006b. Synergy between bird predation and locust control with Metarhizium. pp. 87–88. In: ANCAP/SETAC Int. Conf. on Pesticide Use in Developing Countries: Environmental Fate, Effects and Public Health Implications, Arusha, Tanzania, 16–20 October 2006. Google Scholar

17.

R. Clarke 1996. Montagu's Harrier. Chelmsford, Arlequin Press. Google Scholar

18.

K. Cressman 2001. Desert Locust Guidelines. 2. Survey. 2nd edition. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Google Scholar

19.

J.B. Dunning 1993. Handbook of Avian Body Masses. CRC, Boca Raton. Google Scholar

20.

FAO 2009. Second International Workshop on the Future of Biopesticides for Desert Locust Management (Rome, 10–12 February 2009). FAO, Rome. Google Scholar

21.

A.C. Fowler , L. Knight , T.L. George 1991. Effects of avian predation on grasshopper populations in North Dakota grasslands. Ecology 72: 1775–1781. Google Scholar

22.

C.H. Fry , S. Keith , E.K. Urban (Eds) 1988. The Birds of Africa. Vol. III. Academic Press, London. Google Scholar

23.

C.H. Fry , S. Keith , E.K. Urban , (Eds) 2000. The Birds of Africa. Vol. VI. Academic Press, London. Google Scholar

24.

C.F. Henderson , E.W. Tilton 1955. Test with acaricides against the brown wheat mite. Journal of Economic Entomology 48:157–161. Google Scholar

25.

F.P. Jensen , K.D. Christensen , B.S. Petersen 2008. The avifauna of southeast Niger. Malimbus 30: 30–54. Google Scholar

26.

A. Joern 1986. Experimental study of avian predation on coexisting grasshopper populations (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in sandhills grasslands. Oikos 46: 243–249. Google Scholar

27.

A. Joern 1992. Variable impact of avian predation on grasshopper assemblies in sandhills grasslands. Oikos. 64:458–463. Google Scholar

28.

A. Joern 2000. What are the consequences of non-linear ecological interactions for grasshopper control strategies?, pp. 131–144. In: J.A. Lockwood , A.V. Latchininsky , M.G. Sergeev (Eds) Grasshoppers and Grassland Health: Managing Grasshopper Outbreaks Without Risking Environmental Disaster. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordecht. Google Scholar

29.

S. Keith , E.K. Urban , C.H. Fry (Eds) 1992. The Birds of Africa. Vol. IV. Academic Press, London. Google Scholar

30.

J. Langewald , Z. Ouambama , A. Mamadou , R. Peveling , I. Stolz , R. Bateman , S. Attignon S. Blanford , S. Arthurs , C. Lomer 1999. Comparison of an organophosphate insecticide with a mycoinsecticide for the control of Oedaleus senegalensis Krauss (Orthoptera: Acrididae) and other Sahelian grasshoppers in the field at operational scale. Biocontrol Science and Technology 9: 199–214. Google Scholar

31.

M. Launois , M. H. Launois-Luong 1989. Oedaleus senegalensis (Krauss, 1877) sauteriau ravageur du Sahel,- Collection Acridologie Opérationnelle °4, CILSS-DFPV, Niamey. Google Scholar

32.

M.H. Launois-Luong , M. Lecoq 1989. Vade-mecum des criquets du Sahel. Collection Acridologie Opérationnelle N°. 5. CILSS-DFPV, Niamey. Google Scholar

33.

M. Lecoq 1979. Clés de détermination des acridiens des zones sahéliennes et soudaniennes en Afrique de l'Ouest. Bulletin de l'Institut fondamental d'Afrique noire (Série A) 41: 531–595. Google Scholar

34.

M. Lecoq 1988. Les criquets du Sahel. Collection Acridologie Opérationnelle N°. 1. CILSS-DFPV, Niamey. Google Scholar

35.

M. Lecoq , 2008. Biologie et Dynamique des acridiens d'Afrique de l'Ouest. Cours de 3éme Cycle en Acridologie. Institut Hassan II. Agadir, Maroc. Google Scholar

36.

C. Lomer 1999. LUBILOSA Phase III, final Report. UTA, Cotonou, DFPV, Niamey & CABI, Wallingford. Google Scholar

37.

J. Magor 2007. L'avenir des biopesticides en lutte contre le criquet pèlerin. Rapport de l'Atelier International, Saly, Sénégal, 12–15 février 2007. FAO, Rome. Google Scholar

38.

J. Mestre 1988. Les Acridiens des Formations Herbeuses d'Afrique de l'Ouest, CIRAD/PRIFAS, Montpellier. Google Scholar

39.

G.J. Morel , M-Y. Morel 1978. Recherches écologiques sur une savane sahélienne du Ferlo septentrional, Sénégal, Étude d'une communauté avienne. Cahiers de l'ORSTOM (Bondy), XIII, série Biologie (1) : 3–34 Google Scholar

40.

G. Morel , F. Roux 1966. Les migrateurs paléarctiques au Sénégal. I. Nonpassereaux, Terre Vie 20: 19–72. Google Scholar

41.

W.C. Mullié 2007. Synergie entre prédation et entomopathogènes - un élément essentiel de la lutte biologique, p. 31. In: L'avenir des biopesticides en lutte contre le criquet pèlerin. Atelier international, Saly, Sénégal, 12–15 février 2007. Abstract booklet. FAO, Dakar. Google Scholar

42.

W.C. Mullié 2009. Chapter 14. Birds, locusts and grasshoppers, pp 202–223. In: L. Zwarts , R.G. Bijlsma , der Kamp J. van , E. Wymenga (Eds) Living on the Edge: Wetlands and Birds in a Changing Sahel. KNNV Publishing, Zeist. Google Scholar

43.

W.C. Mullié , Y. Guèye 2009. Efficacité du Green Muscle (Metarhizium anisopliae var. acridum) en dose réduite en lutte antiacridienne au Sénégal en 2008 et son impact sur la faune non-cible et sur la prédation par les oiseaux. Ministère de l'Agriculture, Dakar. Google Scholar

44.

W.C. Mullié , J.O. Keith 1991. Notes on the breeding biology, food and weight of the Singing Bush-Lark Mirafra javanica in northern Senegal. Malimbus 13: 24–39. Google Scholar

45.

W.C. Mullié , J.O. Keith 1993a. The effects of aerially applied fenitrothion and chlorpyrifos on birds in the savannah of northern Senegal. Journal of Applied Ecology 30: 536–550. Google Scholar

46.

W.C. Mullié , J.O. Keith 1993b. Locusticide impact on birds in Northern Senegal. Annales Musée Royal Afrique Centrale - Sciences Zoologiques 268: 617–620. Google Scholar

47.

K.A. Nagy 2005. Review: field metabolic rate and body size. The Journal of Experimental Biology 208: 1621–1625. Google Scholar

48.

Mohamed S. Ould 2009. Rapport final des activités du projet FIDA en Mauritanie (Station d'Akjoujt). Projet CGP/INT/964/IFA. Ministère de l'Agriculture et d'Elevage, Centre National de Lutte Antiacridienne, Nouakchott. Google Scholar

49.

B.S. Petersen , K.D. Christensen , K. Falk , F.P. Jensen , Z. Ouambama 2008. Abdim's Stork Ciconia abdimii exploitation of Senegalese Grasshopper Oedaleus senegalensis in South-eastern Niger. Waterbirds 31: 159–168. Google Scholar

50.

R. Peveling , S. Attignon , J. Langewald , Z. Ouambama 1999. An assessment of the impact of biological and chemical grasshopper control agents on ground-dwelling arthropods in Niger, based on presence/absence sampling. Crop Protection 18: 323–339. Google Scholar

51.

G.B. Popov 1989. Nymphs of Sahelien grasshoppers. Overseas Development Natural Ressources Institute, CILSS-DFPV, Niamey. Google Scholar

52.

PRG (Pesticide Referee Group). 2004. Evaluation of field trials data on the efficacy and selectivity of insecticides on locusts and grasshoppers. FAO, Rome. Google Scholar

53.

P. Sankara 2008. Cours de malherbologie pour ingénieurs en Protection des Végétaux. Université de Ouagadougou / Centre Régional Agrhymet, Niamey. Google Scholar

54.

K. Schoonmaker-Freudenberger 1991. L'habile destruction d'une forêt sahélienne. Programme Réseaux des Zones arides. Dossier no. 29. Institut International pour l'Environnement et le Développement, Londres. Google Scholar

55.

A. Stewart-Oaten , W.W. Murdoch , K.R. Parker 1986. Environmental Impact acessment: “pseudoreplication” in time? Ecology 67: 92–940. Google Scholar

56.

P.J. Terry , 1993. Quelques Adventices Banales des Cultures de l'Afrique Occidentale et la lutte contre celles-là. USAID. Dakar. Google Scholar

57.

J.-M. Thiollay 2006a. The decline of raptors in West Africa: long-term assessment and the role of protected areas. Ibis 148: 240–254. Google Scholar

58.

J.-M. Thiollay 2006b. Severe decline of large birds in the Northern Sahel of West Africa: a long-term assessment. Bird Conservation International 16: 353–365. Google Scholar

59.

L. Thomas , J.L. Laake , S. Strindberg , F.F.C. Marques , S.T. Buckland , D.L. Borchers , D.R. Anderson , K.P. Burnham , S.L. Hedley , J.H. Pollard , J.R.B. Bishop , T.A. Marques 2006. Distance 5.0. Release 2. Research Unit for Wildlife Population Assessment, University of St. Andrews, UK.  http://www.ruwpa.st-and.ac.uk/distance/ Google Scholar

60.

E.K. Urban , C.H. Fry , S. Keith (Eds) 1986. The Birds of Africa. Vol. II. Academic Press, London. Google Scholar

61.

E.K. Urban , C.H. Fry , S. Keith (Eds) 1997. The Birds of Africa. Vol. V. Academic Press, London. Google Scholar

62.

H. van der Valk 2007. Review of the efficacy of Metarhizium anisopliae var. acridum against the Desert Locust. Desert Locust Technical Series AGP/ DL/TS/34. FAO, Rome. Google Scholar

63.

H.-J. von Maydell 1990. Arbres et arbustes du Sahel. Leurs caractéristiques et leurs utilisations. GTZ / Verlag Josef Margraf, Eschborn. Google Scholar

64.

WRI (World Resources Institute). 2009. Drylands, forage and livestock.  http://www.wri.org/publication/content/823 8). Google Scholar

65.

L. Zwarts , R.G. Bijlsma , der Kamp J. van , E. Wymenga (Eds) 2009. Living on the edge: Wetlands and Birds in a Changing Sahel. KNNV Publishing, Zeist. Google Scholar

Notes

[1] *Paper delivered as part of a symposium: Integrated pest management for locusts and grasshoppers: are alternatives to chemical pesticides credible? Antalya, Turkey, 21–25 June 20090.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Appendix 1.

Fresh (WW) and dry body mass (DW) of grasshoppers captured on plots and used for calculations of grasshopper biomass.

tA01a_139.gif

continued

tA01b_139.gif

Appendix 2

Appendix 2.

Number of birds observed per species and per count from 18 d before until 233 d after treatment. Acridivorous and nonacridivorous species are given separately.

tA02a_139.gif

continued

tA02b_139.gif
Wim C. Mullié and Youssoupha Guèye "Does Bird Predation Enhance the Impact of Green Muscle® (Metarhizium acridum) used for Grasshopper Control?," Journal of Orthoptera Research 19(1), 139-155, (1 July 2010). https://doi.org/10.1665/034.019.0109
Received: 7 February 2010; Accepted: 1 June 2010; Published: 1 July 2010
JOURNAL ARTICLE
17 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top