Translator Disclaimer
1 July 2013 Daily Temperature Cycle Induces Daily Hatching Rhythm in Eastern Lubber Grasshoppers, Romalea microptera
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

In nature, Eastern Lubber Grasshoppers, Romalea microptera, tend to hatch in the morning, thus exhibiting a daily hatching rhythm. They also show high intra-pod hatching synchrony. We tested the hypotheses that both diel-hatching rhythmicity and intra-pod hatching synchrony are elicited by a daily temperature cycle. In the laboratory, we exposed egg pods to either a daily 15:26 °C temperature cycle (12 h at each temperature) or a constant 26 °C temperature regimen. Under the daily temperature cycle, hatching was strongly rhythmic, with peak hatching at 3 h after the beginning of the warm phase. Under the constant temperature, hatching rhythmicity was greatly reduced and eggs hatched throughout the 24-h period. There was little intra-pod hatching synchrony under either treatment. We propose that in nature both daily hatching rhythm and intra-pod hatching synchrony are controlled by a thermal threshold for hatching.

Introduction

Virtually all animals exhibit daily behavioral and physiological rhythms (Zaslavski 1988; Koukkari & Sothern 2006; Nelson et al. 2010). Daily rhythms can be expressed by individuals, such as when foraging, sexual, or roosting behaviors are repeated at the same time each day by an individual (Saunders 1976; Loher 1989). Daily rhythms can also be a property of the population, as with once-in-a-lifetime events, such as hatching, adult eclosion, or oviposition (Saunders 1976; Matthews & Matthews 2010; Nelson et al. 2010).

In general, daily rhythms in animals result from one of two main influences. In some cases the rhythmic activity is stimulated or elicited exogenously by an acute rhythmic environmental factor, such as when a threshold level of light, temperature, moisture, or mechanical disturbance is reached (Lockwood & Story 1985;Tomioka et al. 1991;Danks 2005;Bradshaw & Holzapfel 2010). In other cases, the timing of the activity is determined endogenously by an internal biological clock, which itself was previously set by a Zeitgeber (an external oscillating environmental factor that entrains a biological rhythm) (Bünning 1967; Danks 2006; Koštál 2011; Saunders & Bertossa 2011). Often, both exogenous and endogenous processes work together to determine the specific pattern; i.e., acute, current environmental stimuli alter the expression of existing circadian rhythms (Lockwood & Story 1985; Tomioka et al. 1991).

Insect hatching often exhibits a strong diurnal rhythm. Some insect species only hatch at night (Beck 1980; Raina 1982), some during the day (Michiyo 1989;Ramachandran 1989), some primarily at or just before dawn (Beck 1980; Itoh & Sumi 2000; Schilman et al. 2009), and others mainly at or just after dusk (Corbet 1962). In other species, hatching time is random, or it varies over the 24-h period, based on some non-rhythmic environmental factor (Chapman 1998; Vitek & Livdahl 2009).

Little is known about daily hatching rhythms in the approximately 11,100 species of grasshopper, despite the importance of hatching biology in gaining a broader understanding of the population dynamics of pest grasshoppers and locusts. Most of the few and often anecdotal reports about hatching patterns suggest that grasshoppers hatch in mid- to late morning (Kelly & Middlekauff 1961; Uvarov 1966, 1977; Farrow 1975). However, there are also scattered observations of grasshopper populations hatching primarily at or before dawn (Ashall & Ellis 1962; Wardhaugh et al. 1969; Hunter-Jones 1970), throughout the entire day (Pickford 1966), or with appreciable hatching after dark (Pickford 1976). It appears that immediate environmental factors such as temperature and moisture can greatly affect this timing (Ashall & Ellis 1962; Bernays 1971; Uvarov 1977). For example, the same population of Siberian grasshoppers hatched in late morning on a warm and sunny day, but hatched in the afternoon on a cool and cloudy day (Rubtzov 1935). A sudden strong decrease or increase in temperature, due to a sudden cooling rain or warming due to cloud dissipation, can terminate or initiate hatching of grasshoppers in the field (Pickford 1966, 1976; Uvarov 1977). In some desert grasshopper species, rain is reported to cause immediate hatching (Uvarov 1977), but this needs confirmation. Even mechanical stimuli can elicit hatching (Bernays 1971; Farrow 1975). Hence, at this time, we do not understandthe importance or priority of environmental factors that influence the timing of hatching in grasshoppers. In this laboratory study, we examine hatching rhythms in Eastern Lubber Grasshoppers, Romalea microptera (Beauvois), from the Everglades region of south Florida.

The Eastern Lubber Grasshopper ranges across the southeastern USA (Rehn & Grant 1961). They are univoltine, depositing underground egg pods in the summer and fall, containing anywhere from 15 to 78 eggs (Stauffer & Whitman 2007; Taylor & Whitman 2010). In the vertical egg pods, individual eggs can lie from 1 to 9 cm below the ground (Stauffer & Whitman 2007). In south Florida, the hatching period extends from the beginning of February through mid-March, but peaks at the end of February (Stauffer & Whitman 2007). Average daily low and high air temperatures for February in the Everglades area are 8.4 and 26.0 °C (NOAA). In the field, lubbers tend to hatch in the late morning (Whitman, unpub.). In addition, there is a tendency for the eggs in a single pod to hatch synchronously in the wild. For example, it is not uncommon for 15 to 25 insects to emerge from a single pod within a 30-min period (Whitman, unpub.). In nature, synchronous hatching would be highly advantageous. Lubbers are toxic to most vertebrates, and individuals benefit by hatching in unison, because most naïve vertebrate predators would not attack more than a single grasshopper (Whitman & Vincent 2008). Likewise, synchronous hatching could overwhelm the feeding capacity of those predators that are less deterred by lubber toxins, such as spiders (Whitman & Vincent 2008). In contrast to field observations, in the laboratory under fairly constant 26 °C, the grasshoppers tend to hatch individually and randomly throughout the 24-h day, rather than synchronously at a certain time of day. This suggests that in the field, daily cyclical environmental conditions may stimulate daily synchronous hatching rhythms in lubber grasshoppers, but that both rhythmicity and synchronicity of hatching are eliminated under uniform laboratory conditions. We therefore proposed and tested the following hypotheses and predictions:

Hypothesis 1: Daily hatching rhythms in lubber grasshoppers are set by daily temperature cycles. Prediction 1: When reared under a 12:12-h alternating temperature cycle, lubber eggs will exhibit a 24-h hatching cycle. When maintained at a constant temperature, eggs will exhibit no dielhatching rhythm.

Hypotheses 2: Daily temperature rhythms stimulate synchronous hatching within individual egg pods of lubber grasshoppers.

Prediction 2: When reared under a 12:12-h fluctuating temperature cycle, eggs within individual egg pods will tend to hatch in unison. Egg pods reared at a constant temperature will not show intra-pod hatching synchrony.

Methods

Study insect.Romalea microptera (Beauvois) grasshoppers (fam.: Romaleidae) were collected from the Everglades wetlands region in south Florida in 2008 and thereafter cultured continuously at Illinois State University as per Matuszak and Whitman (2001). We used eggs from laboratory-reared females because it allowed us to standardize their conditions and efficiently obtain high numbers of pods.

Egg cups.—We allowed gravid females to oviposit into 1-liter plastic cups filled ¾ full with damp sand(Chladny &Whitman 1997; 1998). Each cup contained a single egg pod consisting of approximately 20 to 75 eggs. Egg cups were sealed with a tight-fitting lid and stored on open shelves in the laboratory at 26 ± 1.5 °C; we periodically opened and added small amounts of tap water to the cups to maintain the sand at approximately 7% moisture level. In the laboratory, pods begin to hatch 4.5 to 6.5 months after laying, and individual pods may continue hatching for 1 to 3 weeks (Stauffer et al. 2011). Individual eggs can be as deep as 9 cm under the ground, and this depth causes some vermiform (fresh-hatched) nymphs to die before reaching the surface. We therefore removed approximately ⅔ of the sand from each cup, which made it easier for nymphs to survive the transit through the soil. For the experiment, we chose 80 egg cups that ranged from 4 to 6 months old. Hence, some of the oldest cups had already started hatching, whereas the youngest pods were not due to hatch for another month. Treatments 1 and 2 (see below) each received 40 cups, balanced for age. Note that each of the pods used in our experiment had been maintained in individual cups, at room temperature, on open laboratory shelves for 4–6 months prior to the start of the experiment.

Experimental design.— We employed three treatments, each in a temperature-controlled environmental chamber, with constant light: Treatment 1: 40 egg cups, each containing a single egg pod, maintained for 12 d at a 12:12-h thermoperiod of 15:26°C. Incubator temperature change was at 8 am and 8 pm, local time.

Treatment 2: 40 egg cups, maintained for 8 d at 26 ± 0.5°C.

Treatment 3: At the completion of Treatment 2, the conditions for the Treatment 2 egg cups were changed to Treatment 1 conditions, for 4 d - i.e., the egg cups were held for 8 d at constant 26°C, and then held for 4 d at a 12:12-h thermoperiod of 15:26°C.

We used 26°C as our warm temperature because it is far above the estimated threshold temperature for hatching (∼ 15°C), but far below the maximum soil surface temperature that can occur in Florida. We selected 15°C for our low temperature because we believe it to be near the hatching threshold temperature and because sub-soil temperatures in south Florida are generally below this temperature during the winter.

During the 12 d experiment, we recorded and removed all newly hatched nymphs from each cup, at the beginning of each hour. It is important to note that these data reflect the times that new hatchlings reached the soil surface, and not when they hatched. There is an approximately 30-min time lag between actual hatching from the egg, buried several centimeters under the sand, and when the struggling vermiform nymph finally reaches the soil surface. Hence, the actual hatching of the eggs occurs (on average) approximately 1 h prior to the recorded emergence time.

For Treatment 1, we also recorded the rate of temperature change inside the soil at the exact position of the eggs: beaded thermocouple probes were inserted into the soil of 5 sealed cups held inside the environmental chamber. Wire leads were threaded through a small hole to the outside of the chamber and connected to a Bailey BAT-12 digital thermometer (Physitemp Instruments, Clifton, NJ). This allowed us to determine how long it took the eggs to thermally equilibrate following the change in the environmental-chamber temperature change from 15 to 26 °C, or vice versa.

Statistical analysis.— For each treatment, we combined the data for all days into 24 consecutive 1-h bins. We used binomial tests to compare the number of individuals hatched during the warm phase vs. the cold phase for Treatments 1 and 3, and the equivalent time periods (from 8 am to 8 pm vs. from 8 pm to 8 am, local time) for Treatment 2.

Results

Treatment 1 egg pods, kept under a 15:26 °C daily temperature cycle and constant light, showed a strong daily hatching rhythm (Fig. 1A). During the 12 d of this treatment, significantly more eggs hatched during the warm than the cold phase (84 vs.7 eggs; binomial test, p < 0.0001). The daily hatching pattern was expressed as a highly right-skewed normal distribution with peak “hatching” recorded at 3 h after the beginning of the warm phase (i.e., at the 11am counting) (Fig. 1A). As noted in the Methods section these data represent when new hatchlings were observed on the soil surface; actual egg hatch (eclosion from the egg) was likely about 1 h earlier.

Treatment 2 egg pods kept at constant 26 °C and in constant light also showed a daily hatching rhythm (Fig. 1B), with significantly more eggs hatching between 8 am and 8 pm than between 8 pm and 8 am (59 vs. 32 eggs; binomial test, p = 0.006). However, rhythmicity in Treatment 2 was much muted compared to Treatment 1. For example, 60% of Treatment 1 eggs hatched between 9 am and 1 pm, vs. only 19% of Treatment 2 eggs during the same 4-h period. When these Treatment 2 egg pods were switched from a constant 26 °C temperature to a cyclical 15:26 °C daily temperature regime (Treatment 3), a very strong diel-hatching rhythm appeared, with 82 eggs hatching during the warm phase and no eggs hatching during the cool phase (binomial test, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 1C); this is similar to the hatching pattern seen in Treatment 1 (Fig. 1A). Furthermore, 56 of these hatchings (68%) occurred in the first day following the temperature regime change. This suggests that hatching rhythms can respond rapidly in response to changes in temperature cycles.

Fig. 1.

Daily hatching patterns of Eastern Lubber Grasshopper eggs maintained under constant or cycling temperatures. Newly hatched individuals were tabulated hourly. A. Eggs maintained at 15:26 °C with a 12:12-h thermoperiod, collected over the course of 12 d. B. Eggs maintained at a constant 26 °C, collected over the course of 8 d. C. Eggs previously maintained at a constant 26 °C, then shifted to a 15:26 °C cycle with a 12:12-h thermoperiod, collected over the course of 4 d

f01_51.jpg

None of the three treatments exhibited high hatching synchrony. If we arbitrarily define hatching synchrony as eight insects hatching from a single pod within a 3-h period, we find that of the 40 cups in each treatment, only 3 Treatment 1 cups (during 12 d), 1 Treatment 2 cup (during 8 d), and 2 Treatment 3 cups (during 4 d) exhibited synchronous hatching. Hence, the conditions in our laboratory experiment failed to produce the intra-pod hatching synchrony observed in the field.

The sand inside the sealed egg cups, at the position of the buried eggs, required 47 ± 8.0 min (mean ± SD) to reach the new temperature, following a change in incubator air temperature from warm to cold or vice versa (i.e., 26 °C to 15 °C or 15 °C to 26 °C). However, half of the temperature difference (i.e., 20.5 °C) was achieved after only 16.0 ± 4.5 min.

Discussion

Our results support the hypothesis that daily hatching rhythms in lubber grasshoppers are set by daily temperature cycles. Eggs maintained under a daily thermal rhythm (Treatment 1) showed a pronounced daily hatching rhythm, whereas eggs maintained at a constant warm temperature (Treatment 2) showed low hatching rhythmicity. The results from Treatment 3 show that hatching patterns in the same egg pods can be rapidly changed from low to high rhythmicity by simply imposing a temperature cycle. Whether these conspicuous hatching rhythms derive primarily from endogenous or exogenous control, or their interaction, remains unexplored. However, the rapidity of rhythm establishment in Treatment 3 (i.e., within hours of switching the eggs from a constant to a fluctuating temperature, a very strong daily hatching rhythm was established, with no eggs hatching during the cold-phase), implies that acute (current) temperatures can immediately alter lubber hatching patterns.

Acute, direct thermal control of hatching has been shown for some insect species (Miyazaki et al. 2011; Tanaka & Watari 2011), including some grasshopper species (Parker 1929; Shotwell 1929, 1941 ; Rubtzov 1935; Padgham 1981 ). The physiological mechanism underlying such a process in temperate species may involve a thermal threshold for hatching. Hatching involves a series of behaviors, and, as such, requires muscle contraction, which, itself, is strongly temperature-dependent(Josephson 1981). Indeed,thermal-performance studies on the closely related Western Lubber Grasshopper, Taeniopoda eques (Burmeister), show that nymphs will not initiate molting below 25 °C, and die if moved to 21 °C after molting has started, because they are unable to complete the behavior at that low temperature (Whitman & Orsak 1985; Chappel & Whitman 1990). Hatching is similar to molting in that both require muscle activity, and both involve emerging from an external “covering”. To hatch, the insect must break the egg shell, wiggle out of the egg shell, struggle up through the soil to reach the surface, and then molt out of the provisional cuticle (Uvarov 1966). These behaviors are all muscle-based and require relatively warm temperatures for these cold-blooded insects.

Because muscle power, contraction rate, and contraction speed all decline precipitously at cold temperatures (Josephson 1981), it would be disastrous for grasshopper eggs to hatch at cold temperatures. At low soil temperatures, the tiny vermiform nymphs would die, because they would be unable to push their way through several centimeters of soil or egg-pod foam (Stauffer & Whitman 1997) to reach the surface. Hence, as is the case with molting, there is probably a low-temperature limit (threshold temperature), below which R. microptera refuse to, or are unable to hatch. As such, we propose that in nature, lubber hatching is triggered acutely when mature embryos reach the temperature threshold for effective muscular activity. We further propose that embryos develop at both cool and warm soil temperatures, but then upon reaching full maturity, wait until a proper temperature to initiate hatching. This does not preclude an additional or dominant endogenous circadian component. As shown in many insects (Edwards 1964; Lockwood & Story 1985) and some grasshoppers (Rubtzov 1935; Padgham 1981), acute temperatures may interact with entrained circadian rhythms to determine time and pattern of hatching. Our hypothesized low-temperature threshold for lubber hatching must be close to 15°C, based on the fact that in our experiment only three eggs hatched at that low temperature (Fig. 1A). Note that in Fig. 1A, the three new hatchlings found at the 9 pm recording period (1 h after the temperature changed from cold to warm), probably initiated hatching while their surrounding soil was still warm, and hence, likely hatched before the change from 26 °C to 15 °C.

We were surprised to observe a statistically significant hatching rhythm inTreatment 2 egg cups held under constant temperature (26 °C) and light in an environmental chamber (Fig. 1B). Over the 8 d of this treatment, 59 eggs hatched during the local “day” (8 am – 8 pm), and 32 during the local “night” (8 pm – 8 am). We offer two hypotheses for this observation: (1) The eggs were entrained to a daily rhythm prior to being placed into constant conditions in the environmental chamber, and subsequently expressed rhythmicity, due to an internal biological clock. (2) The eggs buried in sand, inside sealed containers, inside an environmental chamber, received some sort of external stimulus associated with the outside diel pattern. We would not expect the first explanation, because the day/night temperature difference in our lab, where the eggs cups were kept for approximately 5 months prior to this experiment, was only 1°C. Alternatively, the eggs could have been entrained by the strong daily photoperiod in our lab. But we would not expect grasshopper eggs, which, in nature, are buried under ground (Stauffer & Whitman 1997), to have evolved to respond to light cycles.

Our experiment did not support the hypothesis that daily temperature rhythms stimulate synchronous hatching within individual egg pods. Indeed, we found very low levels of synchronous hatching among our 80 egg cups. Thus, our laboratory results were different than what occurs in nature. We suggest the following explanation: in many temperate grasshopper species, the eggs overwinter and are thus exposed to low temperatures for months (Uvarov 1977). Presumably, embryonic development proceeds at these low winter temperatures (Chapman 1998). Hence, by early spring, many of the buried lubber eggs (embryos) are mature and ready to hatch, but do not do so, because temperatures at that depth are below the threshold for hatching. When spring arrives, sub-soil temperatures begin to increase. Eventually, temperatures at the depth of the buried eggs surpass the thermal-threshold for hatching, eliciting synchronous intra-pod hatching in those eggs. In this scenario, the hatching threshold temperature acts as a thermal gate: over time, it retains a large number of mature embryos. When soil temperatures finally exceed the low-thermal threshold for hatching, the gate is opened, allowing large numbers of eggs to hatch synchronously from that pod. Likewise, when many nearby pods reach the thermal-hatching threshold simultaneously, multiple pods begin to hatch, producing inter-pod hatching synchrony, as well. In the field, this condition occurs in mid- to late morning, after heat from the morning sun conducts down to the level of the buried eggs. In contrast, in our laboratory experiment, eggs were exposed to optimal hatching temperatures daily, allowing daily hatching of any mature embryos. As such, there was little build-up of mature embryos behind a “thermal gate,” and, thus, little intra-pod hatching synchrony.

The above scenario explains both the rhythmic and synchronous hatching pattern observed in lubber grasshoppers in the Everglades region of south Florida. In mid-February in the Everglades, daily high air temperatures average approximately 26 °C, whereas night temperatures reach lows of 0 to 14.4 °C (NOAA). Hence, soil surface temperatures are coolest at dawn, but then begin to warm as solar radiative heating and air temperatures increase in the morning. Eventually those warmer temperatures are conducted to the level of the buried eggs, stimulating the late morning hatching peak that we observed in nature. Although their habitat is densely vegetated, lubbers tend to lay in open, less shaded habitats (Stauffer & Whitman 2007), where the soil would be heated by direct sunlight. In such cases, the soil surface can heat far in excess of the air temperature (e.g., Whitman 1987; Stauffer & Whitman 2007 ). These hot, sun-exposed soils could conceivably elicit hatching, even on cold days. Thus, it is possible for some Florida lubbers to hatch in early February when soil temperatures in sunny spots are hot, but air temperatures are actually below the low-thermal hatching threshold. Note that this laboratory study eliminated the chaotic conditions that exist in nature, where individual females and egg pods experience different and varying conditions. Future field studies will sort out these variables, as well as help to identify the fitness consequences of variation in hatching time of lubbers in nature.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the ISU Insect Biology Research Program, the ISU Undergraduate Research Training Program, the ISU School of Biological Sciences, and by the ISU Animal Behavior class. We thank the many individuals and organizations who have funded these programs.

References

  1. C. Ashall , P. Ellis 1962. Studies on numbers and mortality in field populations of the Desert Locust (Schistocerca gregaria Forskål). Anti-Locust Bulletin 38: 1–59. Google Scholar

  2. S.D. Beck 1980. Insect Photoperiodism. Academic Press, New York. Google Scholar

  3. E.A. Bernays 1971. Hatching in Schistocerca gregaria (Forskal) (Orthoptera, Acrididae). Acrida 1: 41–60. Google Scholar

  4. W.E. Bradshaw , C.M. Holzapfel 2010. What season is it anyway? Circadian tracking vs. photoperiodic anticipation in insects, fournal of Biological Rhythms 25: 155–165. Google Scholar

  5. E. Bünning 1967. The Physiological Clock. Springer-Veerlag, New York. Google Scholar

  6. R.F. Chapman 1998. The Insects Structure and Function. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar

  7. M.A. Chappel , D.W. Whitman 1990. Grasshopper Thermoregulation, pp. 143–172. In: R.F. Chapman , A. Joern (Eds). Biology of Grasshoppers. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Google Scholar

  8. T.A. Chladny , D.W. Whitman 1997. A simple method to culture grasshopper eggs with long egg diapause. Journal of Orthoptera Research 6: 82. Google Scholar

  9. T.A. Chladny , D.W. Whitman 1998. The effects of temperature, soil moisture, and ventilation on the eggs of the grasshopper Romalea guttata. Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Sciences 91: 155–159. Google Scholar

  10. P. Corbet 1962. A Biology of Dragonflies. Witherby Limited, London. Google Scholar

  11. H.V. Danks 2005. How similar are daily and seasonal biological clocks? Journal of Insect Physiology 51: 609–619. Google Scholar

  12. H.V. Danks 2006. Key themes in the study of seasonal adaptations in insects II. Life-cycle patterns. Applied Entomology and Zoology 41: 1–13. Google Scholar

  13. D.K. Edwards 1964. Activity rhythms of lepidopterous defoliators II. Halisidota argentata Pack. (Arctiidae), and Nepytia phantasmaria STKR. (Geometridae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 42: 939–958. Google Scholar

  14. R.A. Farrow 1975. The African Migratory Locust in its main outbreak area of the Middle Niger: quantitative studies of solitary populations in relation to environmental factors. Locusta 11: 1–198. Google Scholar

  15. P. Hunter-Jones 1970. Factors affecting egg-survival in Acridoidea. Proceedings of the International Study Conference: Current and Future Problems of Acridology, London: 111–115. Google Scholar

  16. M.T. Itoh , Y. Sumi 2000. Circadian clock controlling egg hatchling in the cricket (Gryllusbimaculatus). Journal of Biological Rhythms 15: 241–245. Google Scholar

  17. R. K. Josephson 1981. Temperature and the mechanical performance of insect muscle, pp. 19–44. In: B. Heinrich (Ed.) Insect Thermoregulation. Wiley, New York. Google Scholar

  18. G.D. Kelly , W.W. Middlekauff 1961. Biological studies of Dissosteria spurcata Saussure with distributional notes on related California species(Orthoptera-Acrididae). Hilgardia 30: 395–424. Google Scholar

  19. V. Koštál 2011. Insect photoperiodic calendar and circadian clock: independence, cooperation, or unity? Journal of Insect Physiology 57: 538–556. Google Scholar

  20. W.L. Koukkari , SothernR.B . 2006. Introducing Biological Rhythms. Springer, NY. Google Scholar

  21. J.A. Lockwood , R.N. Story 1985. Photic, thermic, and sibling influences on the hatching rhythm of the southern green stink bug, Nezara viridula (L.). Environmental Entomology 14: 562–567. Google Scholar

  22. W. Loher 1989. Temporal organization of reproductive behavior, pp. 83–113. In: F. Huber , T.E. Moore , W. Loher (Eds). Cricket Behavior and Neurobiology. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY. Google Scholar

  23. J.R. Matthews , R.W. Matthews 2010. Insect Behavior. Springer, Dordrecht. Google Scholar

  24. J.V. Matuszak , D.W. Whitman 2001. Captive rearing of eastern lubber grasshopper Romalea microptera , pp. 56–65. In: Proceedings: Invertebrates in Captivity Conference, 2001. Sonoran Arthropod Studies Institute, Ron Rico, AZ, USA. Google Scholar

  25. G. Michiyo 1989. Ecological study on a barnyard grass stem borer, Emmalocera sp. VI. Control of hatching time of eggs (in Japanese). Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology 33: 115–121. Google Scholar

  26. Y. Miyazaki , S.G. Goto , K. Tanaka , O. Saito , Y. Watari 2011. Thermoperiodic regulation of the circadian eclosion rhythm in the flesh fly, Sarcophaga crassipalpis. Journal of Insect Physiology 57: 1249–1258. Google Scholar

  27. R.J. Nelson , D.L. Denlinger , D.E. Somers (Eds). 2010. Photoperiodism. The Biological Calendar. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Google Scholar

  28. NOAA. 2001–2012. (  www.noaa.gov ). Google Scholar

  29. D.E. Padgham 1981. Hatching rhythms in the desert locust, Schistocera gregaria. Physiological Entomology 6: 191–198. Google Scholar

  30. J.R. Parker 1929. Some effects of temperature and moisture upon Melanoplus mexicanus mexicanus Saussure and Camnula pellucida Scudder (Orthoptera). University of Montana Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin No. 223: 1–132. Google Scholar

  31. R. Pickford 1966. The influence of date of oviposition and climatic conditions on hatching of Camnula pellucida (Scudder) (Orthoptera: Acrididae). The Canadian Entomologist 98: 1145–1159. Google Scholar

  32. R. Pickford 1976. Embryonic growth and hatchability of eggs of the TwoStriped Grasshopper, Melanoplus bivittatus (Orthoptera: Acrididae), in relation to date of ovipostion and weather. The Canadian Entomologist 108: 621–626. Google Scholar

  33. A.K. Raina 1982. Daily rhythms in the sorghum shootfly, Atherigona soccata: oviposition, egg-hatch and adult eclosion. Physiological Entomology 7: 65–70. Google Scholar

  34. R. Ramachandran 1989. Hatching pattern and survival of first instars of Ectropis excursaria (Guenee) (Geometridae: Lepidoptera). International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 10: 507–511. Google Scholar

  35. J.A.G. Rehn , H.J. Grant 1961. A Monograph of the Orthoptera of North America. Volume I. Monographs of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia No. 12: 1–257. Google Scholar

  36. I. A. Rubtzov 1935. Regularities in the development and behavior of Siberian Acrididae in connection with climate factors (In Russian with German summary). Izvestiya Akademii Nauk. Pp. 789–824. Google Scholar

  37. D.S. Saunders 1976. Insect Clocks. Pergamon, Oxford. Google Scholar

  38. D.S. Saunders , R.C. Bertossa 2011. Deciphering time measurement: the role of circadian ‘clock’ genes and formal experimentation in insect photoperiodism. Journal of Insect Physiology 57: 557–566. Google Scholar

  39. P.E. Schilman , S.A. Minoli , C.R. Lazzari 2009. The adaptive value of hatching towards the end of the night: lessons from eggs of the haematophagous bug Rhodnius prolixus. Physiological Entomology 34: 231–237. Google Scholar

  40. R.L. Shotwell 1929. Some notes on the grasshopper situation in north central Montana. Journal of Economic Entomology 22: 581–588. Google Scholar

  41. R.L. Shotwell 1941. Life histories and habits of some grasshoppers of economic importance on the great plains. U.S. Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin No. 774: 1–47. Google Scholar

  42. T.W. Stauffer , D.W. Whitman 1997. Grasshopper Oviposition, pp. 231–280. In: S.K. Gangwere , M.C. Muralirangan , M. Muralirangan (Eds). The Bionomics of Grasshoppers, Katydids and their Kin. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. Google Scholar

  43. T.W. Stauffer , D.W. Whitman 2007. Divergent oviposition behaviors in a desert vs a marsh grasshopper. Journal of Orthoptera Research 16: 103–114. Google Scholar

  44. T.W. Stauffer , J.D. Hade , D.W. Whitman 2011. Divergent egg physiologies in two closely related grasshopper species: Taeniopoda eques versus Romalea microptera (Orthoptera: Romaleidae). Environmental Entomology 40: 157–166. Google Scholar

  45. K. Tanaka , Y. Watari 2011. The onion fly modulates the adult eclosion time in response to amplitude of temperature cycle. Naturwissenschaften 98: 711–715. Google Scholar

  46. B. J. Taylor , D.W. Whitman 2010. A test of three hypotheses for ovariole number determination in the grasshopper Romalea microptera. Physiological Entomology 35: 214–221. Google Scholar

  47. K. Wakatsuki T. Tomioka , K. Shimono , Y. Chiba 1991. Circadian control of hatching in the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. Journal of Insect Physiology 37: 365–371. Google Scholar

  48. B. Uvarov 1966. Grasshoppers and Locusts. Volume I. Cambridge University Press, London. Google Scholar

  49. B. Uvarov 1977. Grasshoppers and Locusts. Volume II. Centre for Overseas Pest Research, London. Google Scholar

  50. C.J. Vitek , T. Livdahl 2009. Hatch plasticity in response to varied inundation frequency in Aedes albopictus. Journal of Medical Entomology 46:766–771. Google Scholar

  51. K. Wardhaugh , Y. Ashour , A.O. Ibrahim , A.M. Khan , M. Bassonbol 1969. Experiments on the incubation and hopper development periods of the desert locust (Schistocerca gregaria Forskål) in Saudi Arabia. Anti-Locust Bulletin 45: 9–14. Google Scholar

  52. D.W. Whitman 1987. Thermoregulation and daily activity patterns in a black desert grasshopper, Taeniopoda eques. Animal Behaviour 35: 1814–1826. Google Scholar

  53. D.W. Whitman , L.J. Orsak 1985. Biology of Taeniopoda eques (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in southeastern Arizona. Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 78: 811–825. Google Scholar

  54. D.W. Whitman , S. Vincent 2008. Large size as an antipredator defense in an insect. Journal of Orthoptera Research 17: 353–371. Google Scholar

  55. V.A. Zaslavski 1988. Insect Development, Photoperiodic and Temperature Control. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Google Scholar

Amanda R. Smith, Ashley Nowak, Patrick Wagner, Rebekah Yates, Elise Janci, Ryan Bernales, Taelor Dietz, Alex Earhart, Ariel Fogle, Nigel Fullerton, Kyle Gromer, Brien Kliver, Will Larson, Jessica Ludwikowski, Tony Martini, Joe Mcgrath, Alex Polino, Molly Schumacher, Shannon Weick, Joseph M. Casto, and Doug W. Whitman "Daily Temperature Cycle Induces Daily Hatching Rhythm in Eastern Lubber Grasshoppers, Romalea microptera," Journal of Orthoptera Research 22(1), 51-55, (1 July 2013). https://doi.org/10.1665/034.022.0108
Published: 1 July 2013
JOURNAL ARTICLE
5 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top