Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
2 October 2020 Dracunculus Species in Meso-Mammals from Georgia, United States, and Implications for the Guinea Worm Eradication Program in Chad, Africa
Christopher A. Cleveland, Mark L. Eberhard, Kayla B. Garrett, Alec T. Thompson, Liandrie Swanepoel, Elizabeth A. Miller, Odin L. Stephens, Michael J. Yabsley
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The prevalence and diversity of parasitic nematodes in wildlife have been well studied for certain species, yet for others considerable gaps in knowledge exist. The parasitic nematode Dracunculus insignis infects North American wildlife, and past research on this species has led to an increased understanding of the potential host diversity and transmission of the closely related human Guinea worm, Dracunculus medinensis (which is currently the focus of a global eradication program). Many definitive hosts have been documented for D. insignis; however, the life cycle has been studied only in laboratories, and only a single phylogenetic study has been conducted on D. insignis (from Canada). The goals of the present study were to investigate the prevalence of infections with Dracunculus species among wildlife at a single site (Di-Lane plantation) in the southeastern United States, evaluate the genetic diversity of parasites at this site, and investigate potential paratenic hosts that may be involved in transmission. Over 3 yr, we sampled 228 meso-mammals, reporting an overall prevalence of infection with Dracunculus insignis of 20% (46/228). Amphibians and fish were sampled in the same geographic area as infected meso-mammals. Dracunculus insignis third-stage larvae were recovered from 2 different species of amphibians, but all fish sampled were negative. Phylogenetic analysis of the partial cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) gene showed very little diversity of Dracunculus at Di-Lane; however, we did recover a single nematode from a Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana) that falls outside of the D. insignis clade, more closely aligns with Dracunculus lutrae, and may represent an undescribed species. This work documents the occurrence of D. insignis in frogs, a potential transmission pathway for D. insignis at a single geographic site in nature. When applied to the global Guinea Worm Eradication Program, and Chad, Africa, in particular, this work increases our knowledge of the potential role of aquatic animals in the transmission of Dracunculus species and informs on potential intervention strategies that may be applied to the eradication of Guinea worm in Africa.

Dracunculus spp. are subcutaneous nematode parasites (Family Dracunculidae, Order Spirurida) of numerous reptile and mammalian species. Although natural history data are limited for reptile-infecting species, considerable data are available for Dracunculus medinensis, which infects people and causes Guinea worm disease in Africa. Considerable research also has been conducted on Dracunculus insignis, which infects wildlife species such as raccoons (Procyon lotor), mink (Neovison vison), skunks (Mephitis mephitis), weasels (Mustela spp.), and North American river otters (Lontra canadensis) in North America (Crites, 1963; Crichton and Beverly-Burton, 1974; Anderson, 2000; Cleveland et al., 2018; Williams et al., 2018). Dracunculus infections have been documented in a variety of hosts from multiple regions of North America; however, identification in most studies was limited to the morphology of female worms, which cannot be reliably identified to species without genetic characterization. Although male worms are morphologically distinguishable, they are rarely detected (Cleveland et al., 2018). The only previous study that examined the host range of D. insignis (confirmed by sequence analysis) was conducted in Canada and found that D. insignis recovered from raccoons, mink, fishers (Martes pennanti), and river otters had minimal sequence divergence among hosts, supporting the hypothesis that D. insignis is a host generalist (Elsasser et al., 2009). By contrast, Dracunculus lutrae was found to be a host specialist for river otters but exhibited a high degree of genetic diversity, and several individual otters were infected with multiple parasite lineages (Elsasser et al., 2009).

Dracunculus insignis has been used as a model parasite for eradication efforts of D. medinensis because of its close genetic relationship, the presumed similarities in life cycles, the ability to acquire local specimens, and a history of successful experimental infections (Beverly-Burton and Crichton, 1976; Eberhard et al., 1988; Eberhard and Brandt, 1995; Elsasser et al., 2009). The effectiveness of the eradication program is limited by the state of knowledge on the life cycle of D. medinensis. For example, the epidemiology of D. medinensis has recognizably changed (Eberhard et al., 2014). Since 2012, there has been an increase in the number of peri-domestic dog and cat infections in Chad, Ethiopia, and Mali in Africa (Eberhard et al., 2014; Molyneux and Sankara, 2017). The geographic distribution and increasing number of animal infections led to the hypothesis that aquatic paratenic hosts (e.g., fish and amphibians) may play a role in the transmission of D. medinensis. This was recently supported by experimental work and the detection of a D. medinensis third-stage larvae (L3s) in a wild-caught frog in Chad (Eberhard et al., 2014, 2016a, 2016b; Cleveland et al., 2017). However, little work has been done on the natural cycle of transmission of D. medinensis in Chad among dogs, and no research has been conducted on potential susceptible wildlife. Understanding the natural history and genetic diversity of D. insignis in wildlife in North America may assist the eradication efforts for D. medinensis because, if amphibians are a reliable source of infection to definitive hosts, then this information can provide valuable insight into devising and implementing interventions to prevent infections of D. medinensis in Chadian dogs and cats.

One purpose of this study was to better understand the prevalence and genetic diversity of Dracunculus spp. in various meso-mammals—raccoons, opossums (Didelphis virginiana), coyotes (Canis latrans), bobcats (Lynx rufus), and armadillos (Dasypus novemcinctus)—at a single site in Georgia. To date, no multi-host surveys for Dracunculus spp. have been conducted in the southeastern United States, and the single study that investigated the genetic diversity of D. insignis was conducted on worms collected from throughout Ontario, Canada (Elsasser et al., 2009). In addition, little work has been done examining the natural transmission cycle. Although it has been hypothesized that Dracunculus can use aquatic paratenic host(s) (likely an amphibian), no natural infections of paratenic hosts have been reported for D. insignis and only limited frog species infected with D. medinensis (Crichton and Beverly-Burton, 1977; Anderson, 2000; Eberhard et al., 2016a, 2016b, Cleveland et al., 2019). Thus, we conducted surveillance of local fish and amphibians for D. insignis to identify any paratenic or transport hosts potentially involved in transmission at a site with suspected persistence of the parasite in raccoons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sampling site

Di-Lane plantation is a 3,278-ha wildlife management area located in Burke County, Georgia (32°58′12.2″N, 82°03′34.0″W) managed by the Georgia Department of Natural Resources for early successional habitat with an emphasis on bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus). In addition to habitat management, supplemental feeding and predator control programs currently are being conducted in an effort to increase bobwhite quail populations.

Animal collection

Meso-mammals: Predator removal at Di-Lane plantation was conducted by USDA APHIS Wildlife Services, and we examined the following adult animals (based on size) captured from 2015 to 2017: raccoons, opossums, coyotes, bobcats, and armadillos. In each year of trapping, 120 live capture traps (Tomahawk Live-Trap Company, Tomahawk, Wisconsin) and 120 double coil spring offset jaw foot-hold traps (MB-550, Minnesota Trapline Products Inc., Pennock, Minnesota) were used during 2 trapping sessions occurring from late February to mid-March and from mid-May to June (between 14 and 21 trapping nights per session). Trapping sessions were either right before or during the peak time of emergence of female D. insignis, an important consideration for retrieval of subcutaneous worms because it allows for easier detection of patent infections and determination of whether the females have been mated, are gravid, and may be sustaining the life cycle of Dracunculus spp. at Di-Lane plantation (Cleveland et al., 2018). Each trap was checked beginning at sunrise. Captured animals were euthanized following the American Veterinary Medical Association's guidelines for humane euthanasia of animals (Leary et al., 2013). The examination of animals for pathogens was included in a protocol reviewed and approved by University of Georgia, Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (UGA IACUC) (A2018 02-010).

Paratenic hosts: Amphibians and fish were caught at several permanent ponds at Di-Lane plantation using dip nets in shallow areas (1 m or less) March–June of 2016 and 2017. Animal choice was based on proximity to shallow areas of ponds that would be accessible to meso-mammals during hunting or scavenging events, rather than amphibians and fish that occur in water deeper than 1 m and were unlikely to be caught by meso-mammals. Each animal was euthanized via cervical dislocation, identified to species, eviscerated, and skinned. The remaining muscle tissue was bluntly dissected, facilitating release and recovery of any D. insignis larvae present as described previously (Eberhard et al. 2016a, 2016b; Cleveland et al., 2019). Tissue was placed in Petri dishes with Dulbecco's phosphate buffered saline (DPBS) for a minimum of 4 hr until microscopy was conducted for larval detection (Eberhard and Brandt, 1995). Capture and sampling of aquatic hosts were reviewed and approved by UGA's IACUC (A2018 02-010).

Parasite collection and identification: Meso-mammals were necropsied immediately or were frozen at –20 C until they were necropsied. Peritoneal cavities and subcutaneous tissues were examined for parasites. Subcutaneous parasites were stored in either 70% ethanol (EtOH) immediately or in DPBS overnight to allow L3s to exit for use in experimental infection trials (Cleveland et al., 2017). After the recovery of larvae, nematodes were stored in 70% EtOH for subsequent molecular analyses. Adult females were classified as Dracunculus sp. based on general characteristics such as location in the definitive host, size, morphology, and the presence of larvae (Anderson, 2000; Cleveland et al., 2018). After tissues from amphibians and fish were soaked, the DPBS was examined for larvae. Any larvae exhibiting gross morphologic similarity to Dracunculus spp. were removed, assessed under a compound microscope for the presence of a blunt, trifid tail, and then placed individually in 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tubes with 70% EtOH for molecular characterization. A generalized linear model was performed to analyze the relationship between binary infection status (0 = negative, 1 = infected) with Dracunculus species and the independent variables of species (raccoon or opossum) and sex (male or female). All analyses were performed in R (R Core Team 2019).

Molecular characterization: Adult nematodes were removed from EtOH, and several small (1–2 mm) pieces were placed into a microcentrifuge tube, which was left open for 12 hr to allow EtOH to evaporate. Suspect larvae were processed in the same way as adult nematodes except whole larvae were extracted and the 18S gene was amplified as described by Bimi et al. (2005). DNA was extracted from adult nematodes and larvae using a commercial DNA extraction kit (DNeasy, Qiagen, Valencia, California) following the manufacturer's instructions for tissue. The partial cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) gene was amplified using a cocktail of 6 M13-tagged primers as described (Prosser et al., 2013). Amplicons were purified from a 0.8% agarose gel stained with gel red (Biotium Inc., Hayward, California) using a commercial gel-purification kit (Qiagen). Purified amplicons were bi-directionally sequenced at the University of Georgia Genomics Facility (Athens, Georgia). Chromatograms were analyzed in Geneious R7 (Auckland, New Zealand), and consensus sequences were generated and compared to sequences in the GenBank database. Sequences were aligned using ClustalW (Thompson et al., 2002) in MEGA. Phylogenetic trees were constructed in MEGA X using maximum-likelihood algorithms with partial deletion and 1,000 bootstrap iterations (Kumar et al., 2018). Sequences from this study were deposited into GenBank (accession nos. MK085893–MK085902). For comparison, sequences from D. medinensis (AP017682, HQ216219), D. lutrae from Canada (EU646594, EU646593, EU646600, EU646602), and D. insignis from Canada (EU646534, EU646535, EU646559, EU646569) were obtained from GenBank and included in the phylogenetic analysis with Philometroides sanguinensis (NC024931) and Procamallanus slomei (MG948463) as outgroups to root the tree.

RESULTS

Meso-mammals

A total of 228 meso-mammals were sampled for infection with Dracunculus (Table I), of which 46 were infected with subcutaneous nematodes grossly identified as Dracunculus species. The highest prevalence was noted in raccoons (31%, 38/122, 95% CI 23–40%). Prevalence in male raccoons is 39.5% (95% CI 30–51%), and in female raccoons 11% (95% CI 4–26%). Opossums had the second-highest prevalence (9.9%, 8/81, 95% CI 5%–18%), for male opossums 18% (95% CI 8–35%) and for female opossums 4.2% (95% CI 0.7–14%). Sample sizes were low for coyotes (n = 11), bobcats (n = 7), and armadillos (n = 7), and all individuals were negative. A total of 90 female Dracunculus were recovered, 77 from raccoons and 13 from opossums. Of the 90 recovered specimens, 71% (55/77) were found in the hind limbs of raccoons, and 54% (7/13) were on hind limbs of the opossums. We recovered 5 female Dracunculus from the abdominal (3) and pectoral (2) musculature of opossums. Male Dracunculus spp. were not recovered during this study.

Table I

Prevalence of adult female Dracunculus in meso-mammals sampled at Di-Lane plantation, Waynesboro, Georgia, during 2015–2017.

img-z3-2_616.gif

The generalized linear model showed that the probability of being infected with Dracunculus species was significantly higher among raccoons (z = 3.38, P < 0.001) and males (z = 3.01, P < 0.01) (full model outputs presented in  Suppl. Table S1 (616_para-106-04-15_s01.docx)) compared to opossums and females, and males of both species were more frequently infected than females. However, the highest worm burden was recorded in a female raccoon (n = 9), and female raccoons had a higher average worm burden and range (4.3, n = 1–9, respectively) compared to male raccoons (average 2.7 worms, range n = 1–7). Male opossums had an average of 2.2 worms with a range of 1–5, whereas we recovered only single Dracunculus female worms from female opossums.

Paratenic hosts

During the peak transmission seasons of 2 yr (March–June 2015/2016) of Dracunculus species in Georgia, we sampled 68 frogs representing 5 species (Table II). Dracunculus larvae were detected in 2 species, Rana [Lithobates] catesbeiana (6/43) and Rana [Lithobates] sphenocephala (5/11). The intensity was generally low (mean of 1.6 and 15, respectively) but 1 R. [Lithobates] sphenocephala harbored 45 larvae. A single larva from each positive frog was confirmed to be D. insignis by sequence analysis of the 18S gene and was 99% similar to D. insignis. We also sampled 68 Centrarchus macropterus (Flier sunfish) from ponds on Di-Lane plantation, and all were negative for Dracunculus larvae.

Table II

Prevalence of Dracunculus insignis third-stage larvae (L3) recovered from fish and amphibians at Di-Lane plantation, Waynesboro, Georgia during 2015–2017.

img-z4-2_616.gif

Molecular and phylogenetic analyses

A total of 50/90 adult female nematodes recovered from definitive hosts (38 raccoons, 12 opossums) yielded useable sequence via Sanger sequencing and were genetically characterized. All were confirmed to be Dracunculus species. The maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree revealed no geographic or host clustering of D. insignis sequences. Sequences from all but 1 worm from Di-Lane were 99.9% similar to one another and D. insignis sequences derived in various hosts from Canada (Elsasser et al., 2009). A single worm from an opossum (MK085893) was only 92% similar to D. insignis and 91% similar to D. lutrae (our study and from Elsasser et al. [2009]). The unique Dracunculus sequence from the opossum clustered with other sequences of D. lutrae outside of the D. insignis clade (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Genetic relationships of 50 Dracunculus adult females from raccoons (n = 38) and Virginia opossums (n = 12) from Di-Lane plantation (Georgia) compared with other Dracunculus spp. based on partial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene sequences. The text in bold in the figure represents specimens analyzed in this study. The shaded portion indicates specimens that fall into the Dracunculus insignis clade. Color version available online.

img-z5-2_616.jpg

DISCUSSION

Dracunculus insignis has been well documented in raccoons across a wide geographic area of North America (Crichton and Beverly-Burton, 1974, 1977; Cleveland et al., 2018); however, detailed investigation into the range of susceptible wildlife, associated phylogenetic relationships, and the role of paratenic and transport hosts in the transmission cycle at endemic locations had yet to be investigated. Our study supports the role of raccoons as the most common definitive host for D. insignis (Crichton and Beverly-Burton, 1974) but also indicates the potential involvement of opossums in supporting sylvatic transmission. The diet of opossums is similar to raccoons (McManus, 1974; Kasparian et al., 2002), therefore transmission of D. insignis via consumption of a potential paratenic host could occur. Our finding of D. insignis in R. [Lithobates] catesbeiana and R. [Lithobates] sphenocephala provides further support that paratenic hosts may be important in the life cycle of Dracunculus spp. as revealed by experimental studies and a recent finding in Chad (Eberhard et al., 2016a, 2016b; Cleveland et al., 2017).

The significant difference between the prevalence of infection in male versus female animals could be a result of behavioral differences during the seasonality of sampling (spring); females of both raccoons and opossums are with young during these sampling periods and may have decreased movement while increasing localized foraging bouts. Additionally, female raccoons exhibit greater site fidelity than their male counterparts (Gehrt and Fritzell, 1998), which could limit the use of multiple water sources across the landscape and may explain the lower prevalence of infection among female raccoons in this study. Male raccoons and opossums often have larger territories than females (Holmes and Sanderson, 1965; Lotze and Anderson, 1979; Gehrt and Fritzell, 1998) and could be foraging more broadly across the landscape. Finally, the relationship between raccoons and water is supported by the documented behavior of raccoons utilizing water sources to “wash” their prey, resulting in raccoons at water sources and in proximity to amphibian populations and potential predation of amphibians (Lyall-Watson, 1963; Lotze and Anderson, 1979).

We found no infection in coyotes and bobcats; however, sample sizes were low. Further work is needed to determine if these animals are possibly unrecognized hosts of D. insignis (Cleveland et al., 2018). A recent review of Dracunculus infections in domestic dogs and cats highlights that canids and felids are susceptible to infection (Williams et al., 2018). Furthermore, given the diversity of known hosts for D. insignis, it would seem that infection with D. insignis in coyotes and bobcats is possible and warrants further investigation. Phylogenetic analysis of Dracunculus species recovered from raccoons and opossums showed little sequence divergence, reiterating the role of D. insignis as a host generalist.

The life cycle of D. medinensis was first determined in 1871 (Fedchenko, 1871), and since that time it was considered a human parasite with only rare spill-over events to animals. However, the changing epidemiology in Chad led to the suggestion that aquatic hosts could be involved based on previous experimental data, indicating tadpoles (Rana [Lithobates] pipiens, Rana [Lithobates] clamitans, R. [Lithobates] catesbeiana) are susceptible to infection with D. insignis (Crichton and Beverly-Burton 1977; Eberhard and Brandt, 1995; Eberhard et al., 2014). Despite these experimental data, a published report has documented a single frog in Chad that was found infected with D. medinensis (Eberhard et al., 2016a), and similar findings in 2 additional frog species in Chad have been documented (Cleveland et al., 2019.). Our finding of D. insignis L3s in 11 frogs provides support that paratenic hosts may be involved in the life cycle of Dracunculus spp. (Eberhard and Brandt, 1995; Anderson, 2000). The high number of L3s (n = 45) recovered from the tissue of a single frog from Di-Lane may also partially explain high worm burdens that may occur in some raccoons and opossums. The intensity of infection was generally low among frogs in this study, however, and further work is required to better appreciate the relationship between D. insignis, frogs, and definitive hosts (Table I).

In contrast to frogs, we did not find any larvae in tissues of the sampled fish species C. macropterus. These fish were caught near the shore in the same water bodies as the sampled amphibians and were the only species readily caught via the use of dip nets. It is possible that there are other fish species available to and consumed by meso-mammals at Di-Lane plantation; however, we were not able to catch or sample any other species. The lack of natural infection supports previous experimental work highlighting the difficulty of experimentally infecting fish (Crichton and Beverly-Burton, 1977). However, experimental work does show that fish may have a role as transport hosts instead of paratenic hosts (Cleveland et al., 2017). The ability of a fish to act as a transport host could be a result of the short transit time of larvae and copepods (the intermediate host) through fish gastrointestinal (GI) tracts or the narrow probability of detection of D. insignis L3s within short intervals of fish predating upon infected copepods. For example, previous experimental work has shown that beyond 3 hr from initial ingestion, various species of fish will either digest copepods and larvae or they will pass through the GI system (Cleveland et al., 2017). To date, no fish investigated in the wild has had a true infection in musculature with D. insignis L3s. The role of fish in the transmission of infection to definitive hosts continues to be an important research topic due to the high numbers of fish that are consumed by humans, dogs, and cats in Chad and may be supporting transmission despite eradication efforts.

One purpose of this study was to investigate the diversity of hosts that may be infected with D. insignis at a single geographic site and to evaluate the genetic differences of D. insignis recovered from those infected animals. Overall, we found infections in 2/5 species (raccoons and opossums) and that there was very little genetic difference among the female D. insignis recovered. However, a single recovered worm (OPO MK085893) was not similar to either of the 2 described mammalian Dracunculus species in North America (Fig. 1). This raises numerous questions, including the host range, geographic range, and life cycle of this parasite, highlighting the need for increased molecular characterization work on parasites, especially those like Dracunculus for which few morphological features on adult female worms are useful for distinguishing species. The results of our work and the new influx of publicly available sequences represent a significant contribution to a rather understudied group of parasites of increasing interest and importance. It is our hope that future findings can illustrate the hidden diversity and natural history of the Dracunculus genus.

Finally, we recovered D. insignis L3s from 2 species of amphibians (R. catesbeiana and R. sphenocephala) that may be acting as a common food source among raccoons and opossums (Lotze and Anderson, 1979; Kasparian et al, 2002) and potentially supporting transmission of D. insignis at Di-Lane plantation. When placed in the context of Guinea worm eradication in Chad, it is important to appreciate that sylvatic transmission of D. medinensis may be occurring in wildlife, and this could be responsible for the increasing incidence and prevalence of infections in dogs and cats despite comprehensive intervention strategies. The finding of naturally occurring paratenic hosts for D. insignis coupled with the previous report of a naturally infected frog in Chad (Eberhard et al., 2016a) show that transmission to dogs, cats, and wildlife in Chad may be possible outside of the classical route of ingestion of infected copepods from drinking water. If eradication of D. medinensis is to be achieved, consideration of a wildlife reservoir with potential transmission routes similar to that of D. insignis must be considered.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The Carter Center's work to eradicate Guinea worm disease was made possible by financial and in-kind contributions from many donors. A full listing of supporters is available at  http://www.cartercenter.org/donate/corporate-government-foundation-partners/index.html. We would also like to thank J. Bearden, Georgia Department of Natural Resources, for support and access while on Di-Lane plantation. Additional support for C.C. was received from the ARCS (Achievement Rewards for College Scientists) Atlanta chapter.

LITERATURE CITED

1.

Anderson R. C. 2000. Nematode parasites of vertebrates: Their development and transmission. CABI Publishing, New York, New York, 672 p. Google Scholar

2.

Beverly-Burton, M., and V. F. J. Crichton. 1976. Attempted experimental cross infections with mammalian Guinea worms, Dracunculus spp. (Nematoda: Dracunculoidea). American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 25: 704–708. Google Scholar

3.

Bimi, L., A. R. Freeman, M. L. Eberhard, E. Ruiz-Tiben, and N. J. Pieniazek. 2005. Differentiating Dracunculus medinensis from D. insignis, by the sequence analysis of the 18S rRNA gene. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 99: 511–517. Google Scholar

4.

Cleveland, C. A., M. L. Eberhard, A. T. Thompson, K. B. Garrett, L. Swanepoel, H. Zirimwabagabo, T. Moundai, P. T. Quakou, E. Ruiz-Tiben, and M. J. Yabsley. 2019. A search for tiny dragons (Dracunculus medinensis third-stage larvae) in aquatic animals in Chad, Africa. Scientific Reports 9: 375. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37567-7Google Scholar

5.

Cleveland, C. A., M. L. Eberhard, A. T. Thompson, S. J. Smith, H. Zirimwabagabo, R. Gringolf AND M. J. Yabsley. 2017. Possible role of fish as transport hosts or Dracunculus spp. larvae. Emerging Infectious Diseases 23: 1590–1592. Google Scholar

6.

Cleveland, C. A., K. B. Garrett, R. A. Cozad, B. M. Williams, M. H. Murray, and M. J. Yabsley. 2018. The wild world of Guinea Worms: A review of the genus Dracunculus in wildlife. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 7: 289–300. Google Scholar

7.

Crichton, V. F. J., and M. Beverley-Burton. 1974. Distribution and prevalence of Dracunculus spp. (Nematoda: Dracunculoidea) in mammals in Ontario. Canadian Journal of Zoology 52: 163–167. Google Scholar

8.

Crichton, V. F. J., and M. Beverley-Burton. 1977. Observations on the seasonal prevalence, pathology and transmission of Dracunculus insignis (Nematoda: Dracunculoidea) in the raccoon (Procyon lotor (L.)) in Ontario. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 13: 273–280. Google Scholar

9.

Crites, J. L. 1963. Dracontiasis in Ohio carnivores and reptiles with a discussion of the Dracunculid taxonomic problem (Nematoda: Dracunculidae). Ohio Journal of Science 63: 1–6. Google Scholar

10.

Eberhard, M. L., and F. H. Brandt. 1995. The role of tadpoles and frogs as paratenic hosts in the life cycle of Dracunculus insignis (Nematoda: Dracunculoidea). Journal of Parasitology 81: 792–793. Google Scholar

11.

Eberhard, M. L., C. A. Cleveland, H. Zirimwabagabo, M. J. Yabsley, P. Ouakou, and E. Ruiz-Tiben. 2016a. Guinea worm (Dracunculus medinensis) infection in a wild-caught frog, Chad. Emerging Infectious Diseases 22: 1961–1962. Google Scholar

12.

Eberhard, M. L., E. Ruiz-Tiben, D. R. Hopkins, C. Farrell, F. Toe, A. Weiss, P. C. Withers JR., M. H. Jenks, E. A. Thiele, J. A. Cotton, ET AL. 2014. The peculiar epidemiology of dracunculiasis in Chad. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 90: 61–70. Google Scholar

13.

Eberhard, M. L., E. Ruiz-Tiben, and S. V. Wallace.1988. Dracunculus insignis: Experimental infection in the ferret, Mustela putorius furo. Journal of Helminthology 62: 265–270. Google Scholar

14.

Eberhard, M. L., M. J. Yabsley, H. Zirimwabagabo, H. Bishop, C. A. Cleveland, J. C. Maerz, R. Bringolf, and E. Ruiz-Tiben. 2016b. Possible role of fish and frogs as paratenic hosts of Dracunculus medinensis, Chad. Emerging Infectious Diseases 22: 1428–1430. Google Scholar

15.

Elsasser, S. C., R. Floyd, P. D. N. Hebert, and A. I. Schulte-Hostedde. 2009. Species identification of North American guinea worms (Nematoda: Dracunculus) with DNA barcoding. Molecular Ecology Resources 9: 707–712. Google Scholar

16.

Fedchenko, A. P. 1871. Concerning the structure and reproduction of the Guinea worm (Filaria medinensis L.). American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 20: 511–523. Google Scholar

17.

Gehrt, S. D., and E. K. Fritzell. 1998. Resource distribution, female home range dispersion and male spatial interactions: Group structure in a solitary carnivore. Animal Behaviour 55: 1211–1227. Google Scholar

18.

Holmes, A. C. V., and G. C. Sanderson. 1965. Populations and movements of opossums in east-central Illinois. Journal of Wildlife Management 29: 287–295. Google Scholar

19.

Kasparian, M. A., E. C. Hellgren, and S. M. Ginger. 2002. Food habits of the Virginia opossum during raccoon removal in the Cross Timbers Ecoregion, Oklahoma. Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science 82: 73–78. Google Scholar

20.

Kumar, S., G. Stecher, M. Li, C. Knyaz, and K. Tamura. 2018. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35: 1547–1549. Google Scholar

21.

Leary, S., W. Underwood, R. Anthony, S. Cartner, D. Corey, T. Grandin, C. Greenacre, S. Gwaltney-Brant, M. A. Mccrackin, R. Meyer, ET AL. 2013. AVMA guidelines for the euthanasia of animals. American Veterinary Medical Association, Schaumburg, Illinois, 102 p. Google Scholar

22.

Lotze, J. H., and S. Anderson. 1979. Procyon lotor. Mammalian Species 119: 1–8. Google Scholar

23.

Lyall-Watson, M. 1963. A critical re-examination of food “washing” behaviour in the raccoon (Procyon lotor Linn.). Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 141: 371–393. Google Scholar

24.

Mcmanus, J. J. 1974. Didelphus virginana. Mammalian Species 40: 1–6. Google Scholar

25.

Molyneux, D., and D. P. Sankara. 2017. Guinea worm eradication: Progress and challenges-should we beware of the dog? PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 11: e0005495. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal/pntd.0005495Google Scholar

26.

Prosser, S. W., M. G. Velarde-Aguilar, V. León-Règagnon, and P. D. N. Hebert. 2013. Advancing nematode barcoding: A primer cocktail for the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene from vertebrate parasitic nematodes. Molecular Ecology Resources 13: 1108–1115. Google Scholar

27.

R Core Team. 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: https://www.R-project.org/ . Accessed 1 July 2019. Google Scholar

28.

Thompson, J. D., T. J. Gibson, and D. G. Higgins. 2002. Multiple sequence alignment using ClustalW and ClustalX. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics 00: 2.3.1–2.3.22. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471250953.bi0203s00Google Scholar

29.

Williams, B. M., C. A. Cleveland, G. G. Verocai, L. Swanepoel, K. D. Niedringhaus, K. L. Paras, Y. Nagamori, S. E. Little, A. Varela-Stokes, N. Nemeth, ET AL. 2018. Dracunculus infections in domestic dogs and cats in North America: An under-recognized parasite? Veterinary Parasitology: Regional Studies and Reports 13: 148–155. Google Scholar
© American Society of Parasitologists 2020 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Christopher A. Cleveland, Mark L. Eberhard, Kayla B. Garrett, Alec T. Thompson, Liandrie Swanepoel, Elizabeth A. Miller, Odin L. Stephens, and Michael J. Yabsley "Dracunculus Species in Meso-Mammals from Georgia, United States, and Implications for the Guinea Worm Eradication Program in Chad, Africa," Journal of Parasitology 106(4), 616-622, (2 October 2020). https://doi.org/10.1645/18-178
Published: 2 October 2020
KEYWORDS
amphibians
Dracunculus
Fish
Georgia
Guinea Worm
nematode
raccoons
Back to Top