How to translate text using browser tools
1 June 2009 Between-population Similarity in Intestinal Parasite Community Structure of Pike (Esox Lucius)—Effects of Distance and Historical Connections
Anssi Karvonen, E. Tellervo Valtonen
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The effect of geographical distance on similarity in parasite communities of freshwater fish has received considerable attention in recent years, and it has become evident that these apparently simple relationships are influenced by, among other things, colonization ability of parasites and degree of connectivity between the populations. In the present paper, we explored qualitative and quantitative similarity in the intestinal parasite communities of pike (Esox lucius) in a particular system where previously interconnected groups of lakes became isolated ca. 8,400 yr ago. Contrary to our expectations, we did not find differences in similarity between the lake groups or a negative effect of distance among the populations. This supports the role of common ancestral colonization events and shows that no significant loss of species has occurred during the past 8,000 yr. However, the communities were dominated by a single parasite species, the cestode Triaenophorus nodulosus. The exclusion of this species from the data had a significant negative impact on the community similarities and also revealed a negative relationship between distance and quantitative similarity. This suggests that patterns of community organization may be obscured by a single dominant species. We also highlight the need for further studies in different systems and host species, as well as detailed re-analysis of existing data sets, to unravel the controversy in the relationship between distance and similarity in parasite communities.

Anssi Karvonen and E. Tellervo Valtonen "Between-population Similarity in Intestinal Parasite Community Structure of Pike (Esox Lucius)—Effects of Distance and Historical Connections," Journal of Parasitology 95(3), 505-511, (1 June 2009). https://doi.org/10.1645/GE-1564.1
Received: 3 January 2008; Accepted: 1 October 2008; Published: 1 June 2009
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top