Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2006 THE FOOD HABITS OF EURASIAN EAGLE-OWLS IN SOUTHERN PORTUGAL
Author Affiliations +

Knowledge of the food habits of a predator is essential for its conservation because diet may influence survival (Hakkarainen et al. 2002) and breeding performance (Viñuela and Veiga 1992, Arroyo 1998, Penteriani et al. 2002), or reveal possible conflicts with human activities (Thirgood and Redpath 2000). Moreover, the analysis of the diet of top predators may be particularly useful for species conservation when intraguild predation is occurring (Sergio et al. 2003).

The Eurasian Eagle-Owl (Bubo bubo) is a large predator with a Palearctic distribution and the diet of European populations has been widely studied in several countries (Penteriani 1996). However, the information on the diet of this species in the Iberian Peninsula is only available for Spanish regions (e.g., Hiraldo et al. 1975, Donázar 1989, Serrano 1998, Martínez and Zuberogoitia 2001), and no information is available for Portugal.

Lagomorphs, and more specifically European rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus), play an important ecological role in the food webs of western Mediterranean ecosystems (Delibes and Hiraldo 1981, Iborra et al. 1990). Iberian eagle-owls are rabbit specialists (Hiraldo et al. 1976, Donázar et al. 1989) and, due to the abundance of this prey, attain locally high population densities (Delgado et al. 2004, Ortego and Díaz 2004). In recent decades, myxomatosis and rabbit hemorrhagic disease were responsible for the large decline of rabbit populations in the Iberian Peninsula (Villafuerte et al. 1995). Consequently, rabbit-dependent species such as the Spanish Imperial Eagle (Aquila adalberti) and the Iberian lynx Lynx pardinus are presently in need of conservation action (Ferrer and Negro 2004). Although the large scale effects of rabbit diseases on Iberian eagle-owl populations have never been evaluated, rabbit declines have been shown to influence negatively both this owl (Martínez and Zuberogoitia 2001, Penteriani et al. 2002) and other raptors through direct and indirect effects (Tella and Mañosa 1993). The objective of this study was to describe the diet of eagle- owls in southern Portugal, and to analyze possible intrapopulation differences in diet.

Study Area and Methods

The study area is located in Alentejo and Algarve provinces (southern Portugal), in the Meso-Mediterranean and Thermo-Mediterranean bioclimatic belts, characterized by a hot, dry Mediterranean climate (Rivas-Martínez et al. 2002). The landscape is dominated by plains or low hills with the elevation ranging from sea level to 1000 m above sea level. The main habitats are agricultural fields (cereal steppes, olive groves, and vineyards) and Mediterranean scrublands, as well as holm oak (Quercus rotundifolia) and cork oak (Quercus suber) pastoral woodlands (montados).

Eagle-owl territories were searched from 1997 to 2004 by combining listening and playback sessions during the pre-laying period (November–February in the study area). From March to June, all suitable areas were visited to search for nests, roost sites, and feeding perches.

The diet of eagle-owls was studied in 23 territories and, in order to reduce disturbance, we only visited collecting sites at the end of the breeding season. During each visit, all prey remains (i.e., recent and old pellets, prey remains, and accumulated bones) were collected from recently used nests and feeding perches. The minimum number of individuals was determined following recommendations of (Marchesi et al. 2002) in order to avoid bias. Prey items were identified by comparison with the collection of the Laboratory of Archaeozoology (IPA - Portuguese Institute of Archaeology), and using identification keys for bones and feathers.

Principal Components Analysis (PCA) was used to examine variation in diets and place the different territories into subsets in terms of diet tendencies, based on the frequencies of 14 prey classes. In this analysis, the components (axes) revealed the correlations among variables (prey classes), and each territory was then related to these components (Tabachnick and Fidell 2001). Data in the cross-products matrix were centered by columns (variance/covariance), so that the variables contributed to the analysis in proportion to their variances (Jongman et al. 1995). Scores for column variables were calculated by weighted averaging (McCune and Mefford 1999).

Results

The 23 territories yielded 2666 prey items, belonging to 64 different species (Table 1). Lagomorphs (rabbit and Iberian hare [Lepus granatensis]) were the most frequent prey in the majority of the territories, ranging from 27–67% (x̅  =  47%). Among the other mammal species, the most frequent prey species were rodents (x̅  =  13%) and Hedgehogs Erinaceus europaeus (x̅  =  5%). Birds were present with frequencies ranging 14–48% (x̅  =  32%), of which passerines (x̅  =  9%), pigeons and doves (x̅  =  4%), owls (x̅  =  3%), the Common Moorhen (Gallinula chloropus; 91% of the overall Gruiformes, x̅  =  3%), and the Red-legged Partridge (Alectoris rufa ; 99% of the overall Galliformes, x̅  =  9%) were the most frequent.

Table 1

Mean percentage contribution by number and by mass for prey items collected at 23 Eurasian Eagle-Owl territories in southern Portugal.

i0892-1016-40-4-297-t01.gif

The first two axes of the PCA explained 76% of the variance, and axis 1 was positively correlated with lagomorphs and negatively with birds, while axis 2 was positively correlated with lagomorphs and negatively with rodents (Fig. 1). No obvious subgroups in terms of diet tendency were apparent, and most territories were found along a gradient between diets dominated by lagomorphs, and diets based on lagomorphs and birds.

Figure 1

PCA scatter plot of prey remains found in 23 Eurasian Eagle-Owl territories in southern Portugal, analyzed using the frequency of the following 14 prey classes: mammals (all species), insectivores, rodents, southern water vole (Arvicola sapidus), rats (Rattus spp.), lagomorphs, Iberian hare (Lepus granatensis), birds (all species), Galliformes, Gruiformes, Charadriiformes, Columbiformes, Strigiformes, and Passeriformes.

i0892-1016-40-4-297-f01.gif

Discussion

The eagle-owl is considered a generalist top-predator that specializes in the most advantageous food and is therefore able to occupy several biomes (Donázar et al. 1989). In southern Portugal, as in other Mediterranean habitats, lagomorphs were the most common prey of this owl, probably due to their abundance and size. However, in this region, Iberian hares made up a significant fraction of the lagomorphs in the diet, and had a higher mean frequency (9%) than in most Spanish regions (e.g., Hiraldo et al. 1975, Donázar 1989, Serrano 1998, Martínez and Zuberogoitia 2001). On the other hand, some pairs showed more diverse diets, which included small mammals and birds, possibly as a response to lower availability of lagomorphs, as previously shown by other authors for this opportunistic predator (Serrano 1998, Penteriani et al. 2002).

The frequency of owls recorded as prey of the eagle-owls in this study may be relatively high, compared to values documented in a review of intraguild predation in Mediterranean eagle-owls (Serrano 2000). Such predation may indicate possible food limitation in some areas.

In the PCA analysis, food composition varied continuously along a gradient, and no major subgroups with specific dietary tendencies could be clearly discerned, probably as a consequence of the gradual landscape changes found in southern Portugal. At this regional scale, the observed gradient in diet did not coincide with a geographical gradient, which might indicate that habitat characteristics at the home-range scale are the main factors influencing eagle-owl food habits. However, further investigation will be needed to understand the role of these factors.

Acknowledgments

I am thankful to V. Penteriani, F. Sergio, J.A. Martínez, J.E. Rabaça, A. Mira, and M.M. Delgado for useful comments on previous versions of this paper, and L. Thompson for improving the English. M. Álvaro, M. Basto, S. Chollet, C. Franco, M. Pais, I. Prego, and J.P. Silva gave helpful field assistance. I am also thankful to S. Santos for support and comments.

Literature Cited

1.

B. E. Arroyo 1998. Effect of diet on the reproductive success of Montagu's Harrier Circus pygargus. Ibis 140:690–693. Google Scholar

2.

M. M. Delgado, C. Maggio, A. Basanta, C. Escot, and V. Penteriani . 2004. Preliminary data on an Eagle Owl Bubo bubo population in S-W Spain. 58–59. in R. D. Chancello and B-U. Meyburg , editors. eds. Raptors worldwide: proceedings of the VI world conference on birds of prey and owls. World Working Group of Birds of Prey and Owls. Berlin, Germany MME/BirdLife. Budapest, Hungary. Google Scholar

3.

M. Delibes and F. Hiraldo . 1981. The rabbit as prey in the Iberian Mediterranean ecosystem. 614–622. in K. Myers and C. D. MacInnes , editors. eds. Proceedings of the world lagomorph conference. University of Guelph and Wildlife Research, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. Toronto, Canada. Google Scholar

4.

J. A. Donázar 1989. Variaciones geográficas y estacionales en la alimentación del Búho Real Bubo bubo en Navarra. Ardeola 36:25–39. Google Scholar

5.

J. A. Donázar, F. Hiraldo, M. Delibes, and R. R. Estrella . 1989. Comparative food habits of the Eagle Owl Bubo bubo and the Great Horned Owl Bubo virginianus in six Palearctic and Nearctic biomes. Ornis Scand 20:298–306. Google Scholar

6.

M. Ferrer and J. J. Negro . 2004. The near extinction of two large European predators: super specialists pay a price. Conserv. Biol 18:344–349. Google Scholar

7.

H. Hakkarainen, E. Korpimaki, V. Koivunen, and R. Ydenberg . 2002. Survival of male Tengmalm's Owls under temporally varying food conditions. Oecologia 131:83–88. Google Scholar

8.

F. Hiraldo, J. Andrada, and F. F. Parreño . 1975. Diet of the Eagle Owl (Bubo bubo) in Mediterranean Spain. Doñana Acta Vertebrata 2:161–177. Google Scholar

9.

F. Hiraldo, F. F. Parreño, V. Andrada, and F. Amores . 1976. Variations in the food habits of the European Eagle Owl (Bubo bubo). Doñana Acta Vertebrata 3:137–156. Google Scholar

10.

O. Iborra, C. P. Arthur, and P. Bayle . 1990. Importance trophique du lapin du garenne pour les grands rapaces provençaux. Vie Milieu 40:177–188. Google Scholar

11.

R. H. G. Jongman, C. J. F. Ter Braak, and O. F. R. Van Tongeren . 1995. Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, U.K. Google Scholar

12.

L. Marchesi, P. Pedrini, and F. Sergio . 2002. Biases associated with diet study methods in the Eurasian Eagle-Owl. J. Raptor Res 36:11–16. Google Scholar

13.

J. A. MartÍnez and I. Zuberogoitia . 2001. The response of the Eagle Owl (Bubo bubo) to an outbreak of the rabbit haemorrhagic disease. J. Ornithol 142:204–211. Google Scholar

14.

B. McCune and M. J. Mefford . 1999. PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data. Version 4. MjM Software Design. Gleneden Beach, OR, U.S.A. Google Scholar

15.

J. Ortego and M. DÍaz . 2004. Habitat preferences models for nesting Eagle Owls Bubo bubo: how much can be inferred from changes with spatial scale? Ardeola 51:385–394. Google Scholar

16.

V. Penteriani 1996. The Eagle Owl. Calderini Edagricole. Bologna, Italy. (In Italian). Google Scholar

17.

V. Penteriani, M. Gallardo, and P. Roche . 2002. Landscape structure and food supply affect Eagle Owl (Bubo bubo) density and breeding performance: a case of intrapopulation heterogeneity. J. Zool. (Lond.) 257:365–372. Google Scholar

18.

S. Rivas-MartÍnez, T. E. DÍaz, F. Fernández-González, J. Izco, J. Loidi, M. Lousã, and A. Penas . 2002. Vascular plant communities of Spain and Portugal. Itinera Geobotanica 15:5–432. Google Scholar

19.

F. Sergio, L. Marchesi, and P. Pedrini . 2003. Spatial refugia and the coexistence of a diurnal raptor with its intraguild owl predator. J. Anim. Ecol 72:232–245. Google Scholar

20.

D. Serrano 1998. Diferencias interhabitat en la alimentación del Búho Real (Bubo bubo) en el Valle Medio del Ebro (NE de España): efecto de la disponibilidad de conejo (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Ardeola 45:35–46. Google Scholar

21.

D. Serrano 2000. Relationship between raptors and rabbits in the diet of Eagle Owls in southwestern Europe: competition removal or food stress? J. Raptor Res 34:305–310. Google Scholar

22.

B. G. Tabachnick and L. S. Fidell . 2001. Using multivariate statistics. 4th edition. Allyn and Bacon. Needham Heights, MA, U.S.A. Google Scholar

23.

J. L. Tella and S. Mañosa . 1993. Eagle Owl predation on Egyptian Vulture and Northern Goshawk: possible effect of a decrease in European rabbit availability. J. Raptor Res 27:111–112. Google Scholar

24.

S. Thirgood and S. Redpath . 2000. Raptors and Red Grouse: conservation conflicts and management solutions. Conserv. Biol 14:95–104. Google Scholar

25.

R. Villafuerte, C. Calvete, J. C. Blanco, and J. Lucientes . 1995. Incidence of viral haemorrhagic disease in wild rabbit populations in Spain. Mammalia 59:651–659. Google Scholar

26.

J. Viñuela and J. P. Veiga . 1992. Importance of rabbits in the diet and reproductive success of Black Kites in southwestern Spain. Ornis Scand 23:132–138. Google Scholar
Rui LourenÇo "THE FOOD HABITS OF EURASIAN EAGLE-OWLS IN SOUTHERN PORTUGAL," Journal of Raptor Research 40(4), 297-300, (1 December 2006). https://doi.org/10.3356/0892-1016(2006)40[297:TFHOEE]2.0.CO;2
Received: 4 May 2005; Accepted: 14 July 2006; Published: 1 December 2006
JOURNAL ARTICLE
4 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top