Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2007 NEST-SITE SELECTION OF NORTHERN GOSHAWKS AND EURASIAN SPARROWHAWKS IN A FRAGMENTED LANDSCAPE IN NORTHERN JAPAN
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

We measured the characteristics of trees and sites of 14 Northern Goshawk (Accipiter gentilis) and 14 Eurasian Sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus) nests in the Ishikari Plain of Hokkaido, Japan, where their nesting habitats were fragmented into small woodlots. We also randomly located 25 plots (0.033 ha each) in unused woodlots to compare differences between nest and random sites. Goshawks nested in a variety of trees and diameters at breast height (dbh) of nest trees were significantly larger than the mean values for all trees in the nest sites, and were similar to the largest trees in these sites. The heights of nest trees were significantly larger than the mean values of all trees in the nest sites. Goshawks nested in a variety of forest types, in proportion to their availability. The dbh and tree heights of sparrowhawk nest trees were significantly larger than the mean values of all trees in the nest sites, and were significantly smaller than the largest trees in these sites. Sparrowhawks nested only in evergreen conifers, and their nests were more likely to occur in evergreen coniferous forests than in other forest types. Diameters of nest trees were larger for goshawks than sparrowhawks, but the tree density was higher for sparrowhawks. Goshawks and sparrowhawks nesting sites were further from human habitation than random sites, but averaged only 247 and 229 m from houses, respectively.

Finding a suitable place to live and reproduce is one of the ways that birds increase their fitness (Cody 1985), and features of the nest site directly affect breeding success in birds (Newton 1991). Because many raptors are long-lived and have large home ranges, they are likely to select nesting places that maximize breeding success and lifetime reproduction (Newton 1979).

Because of increasing human activity, the habitats of several raptors have either changed or disappeared (Bird et al. 1996). For example, timber harvesting activities have affected forest raptors by altering foraging areas and nest sites (McCarthy et al. 1989, Crocker-Bedford 1990, Lõhmus 2005). Furthermore, the changing of woodlands into farmlands and human residential areas can lead to disappearance of nest sites for forest raptors. In Japan, according to national policy for managing forests, natural forests were converted to single-species coniferous forests in the middle of the nineteenth century (Hokkaido Forestry Kaikan 1983). In addition, river modifications and dam construction have caused a decline in habitat and population of fish (Shimoda et al. 1993). Consequently, piscivorous Blakiston's Fish-Owls (Ketupa blakistoni) are threatened with extinction, because of the reduction in nest sites and food resources (Hayashi 1997, Takenaka 1998). Conversely, some raptor species have responded to human activities by colonizing areas in and near human habitation. For example, Peregrine Falcons (Falco peregrinus) and Eurasian Kestrels (Falco tinnunculus) have nested on human-made structures such as buildings and bridges (Newton 1979, Cade 1982).

Northern Goshawks (Accipiter gentilis) range across the holarctic region and Eurasian Sparrowhawks (Accipiter nisus) are distributed in Eurasia and northern Africa, and both species inhabit forests and prey primarily on birds (Brown and Amadon 1968). Goshawks have been considered an area-sensitive species, preferring deep and remote forest patches and requiring isolation from human disturbance (Marquiss and Newton 1982, Robbins et al. 1989, Krüger 2002). However, some recent studies report that goshawks nest in fragmented forests within more agricultural landscapes in Europe (Kenward 1982, 1996, Krüger 2002). Sparrowhawks are found closer to human habitation and often nest in fragmented smaller forests (Brown and Amadon 1968, Newton 1986, van Diermen 1996).

In Japan, goshawks prefer nesting in low to middle elevations, and sparrowhawks are thought to nest primarily in highland areas (Higuchi et al. 1996). The latter also breed in low elevations of northern Japan, and the two hawks occasionally nest in the same forests (Morioka et al. 1995). In Hokkaido, the northernmost island of Japan, natural forests were replaced by farmlands and grasslands after the beginning of reclamation at the end of the nineteenth century (Takenaka 1998). As a result, the Ishikari Plain of Hokkaido contains many fragmented small or long and narrow woodlots such as shelterbelts, which do not appear suitable for nesting by forest species. Both goshawks and sparrowhawks commonly nest in those fragmented woodlots of the Ishikari Plain. The objectives of this study were to describe the characteristics of nest trees and nest sites for goshawks and sparrowhawks breeding in fragmented woodlots, and to determine the important factors for nest-site selection of each hawk species in this region.

Study Area

Our study was conducted from 2002–2006 on the Ishikari Plain, central Hokkaido (area: 920 km2, elevation: 5–80 m), including the northern margins of Sapporo city. The monthly mean temperature was −5.9°C in January and 20.5°C in August, and the annual precipitation was ca. 1000 mm, with snow cover from December to April (from the database of Japan Meteorological Agency,  http://www.data.jma.go.jp/obd/stats/etrn/index.php). The study area included agricultural lands (70%; rice paddy fields, croplands, and meadows), urban/suburban areas (15%), woodlots (7%), and rivers/oxbows (3%). Most of the woodlots were long and narrow shelterbelts adjacent to agricultural lands (Fig. 1), providing humans easy access to the woodlots through contiguous fields or roads. The woodlots consisted of deciduous broad-leaved trees including Manchurian ash (Fraxinus mandshurica var. japonica) and Japanese white birch (Betula platyphylla var. japonica), evergreen conifers including Norway spruce (Picea abies) and Sakhalin spruce (Picea glehnii), and a deciduous conifer Japanese larch (Larix kaempferi).

Figure 1

The study area in the Ishikari Plain of Hokkaido in Japan. (a) Land use in the study area, where dark shading indicates woodlands, including shelterbelts (represented by lines); gray shading indicates residence area; blank area indicates agricultural lands. Sapporo city is located southwest of the study area. (b) Schematic map of a nesting site: open circle, line, and shaded square indicate nest, road and house, respectively; distances from nest to nearest road and house are measured as r and h (m).

i0892-1016-41-4-299-f01.gif

Methods

Nest Surveys

We conducted nest searches on foot throughout woodlots in the study area except in woodlots consisting of only saplings which were unsuitable for nesting. We excluded large forests from our analysis and focused on fragmented habitats. Goshawks start incubation in late April and sparrowhawks in early May (F. Abe unpubl. data.). We checked the occupancy of goshawk nests from mid-May in 2002–2005 and sparrowhawk nests from mid-May in 2003–2005. We searched for nests until the end of July, by which time most sparrowhawk nestlings had fledged.

We located 34 goshawk nesting areas and 22 sparrowhawk nesting areas during the survey. Most nests were located in shelterbelts or isolated forests that had similar features. The nesting areas often contained several nests that were used at least once during the years of our study. To avoid biases due to preferences of individual birds, we selected one nest which was used at least one time between 2002–2005 from each nesting area for our study. Our final data set contained 14 goshawk and 14 sparrowhawk nests randomly selected from the study area.

Nest and Nest Site Measurements

Vegetation surveys were conducted during September to February, 2003–2006. We identified nest tree species and categorized them as evergreen conifer, deciduous conifer, or deciduous broad-leaved trees. We measured the diameter at breast height (dbh), tree height, nest height, nest position, and distance from each nest tree to the nearest woodlot margin for all nest trees. Nest height was measured to the nest's upper edge from the ground. Nest position was calculated as nest height in relation to tree height. The nest site was defined as immediate area surrounding the nest (0.033-ha hexagonal plot centered on each nest tree). The plot's diagonal line (22.6 m) was set to the same length as a diameter of the circular plots used by James and Shugart (1970). We measured all trees >5 cm dbh. Based on composition of tree types within each plot, we categorized nest sites into four forest types: (1) ≥70% dominated by evergreen conifers, (2) ≥70% dominated by deciduous conifers, (3) ≥70% dominated by deciduous broad-leaved trees, and (4) <70% dominated by evergreen conifers, deciduous conifers, or deciduous broad-leaved trees (mixed forest). We calculated the mean values of dbh and tree height, and noted the maximum values of those measurements at each nest site. We also calculated tree density and basal area at each nest site and width of the woodlot for each plot. Distances from a nest tree to the nearest house or road were estimated using 1∶25000 topographic maps (see Fig. 1; Geographical Survey Institute of Japan 1997).

We randomly located 25 hexagonal plots (0.033 ha; random sites) on unused woodlots in fragmented habitat. The random sites were located in a random direction and more than 500 m away from any nests. We measured distances from each centered tree to the nearest house or road, and made all other measurements as in the nest plots (above).

Data Analyses

We used paired t-tests to compare the values of dbh and height of each nest tree with the mean values and the maximum values of those measurements in each nest site and Fisher's exact test to compare composition of forest types in nest sites and random sites. We performed logistic regression analysis to compare the measurements of characteristics in nest sites with those in random sites. Explanatory variables were mean tree dbh, mean tree height, tree density, basal area, distance to the nearest house, distance to the nearest road, and width of woodlot. To detect multi-collinearity among variables, we checked the tolerance value for each variable. Tolerance for a variable was calculated as 1 - r2 from the OLS regression analysis of it against the remaining variables (Quinn and Keough 2002). When a tolerance value was <0.10, we checked correlations between variables and excluded one of two variables indicating correlation (r > 0.70). All tolerance values of variables were >0.10, indicating no multi-collinearity between variables. All seven variables were put in the logistic regression model and variable selection was conducted using Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC; Burnham and Anderson 1998). BIC were calculated for all possible subsets of models.

To compare nest tree/site selections between the two hawk species, logistic regression analyses were performed. For the nest trees comparison, explanatory variables including dbh of nest tree, nest tree height, nest height, nest position, and distance to the nearest woodlot margin were put into the analysis. Tolerance values of nest tree height, nest height and nest position were <0.10, and there was strong correlation between nest height and nest position (r  =  0.77); therefore, we excluded nest position from our analysis. For the nest sites comparison, explanatory variables including mean tree dbh, mean tree height, tree density, basal area, distance to the nearest house, distance to the nearest road, and width of woodlot were input into the logistic regression models. The statistic analyses were performed using the statistical package R ( http://www.r-project.org/). Significance level was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Nest Tree Characteristics

Goshawks nested in evergreen conifers, deciduous conifers, and deciduous broad-leaved trees (Table 1). Dbh values of nest trees were greater than mean dbh in the nest sites (t  =  7.01, df  =  13, P < 0.001; Table 2), and were similar to those of the largest trees in the nest sites (t  =  −1.75, df  =  13, P  =  0.10). Nest trees were taller than other trees in the nest sites (t  =  7.47, df  =  13, P < 0.001) but shorter than the tallest trees in the nest sites (t  =  −6.46, df  =  13, P < 0.001).

Table 1

Nest tree species of goshawks and sparrowhawks in the Ishikari Plain of Hokkaido, Japan, 2002–2005.

i0892-1016-41-4-299-t01.gif

Table 2

Characteristics of nest trees of goshawks and sparrowhawks in the Ishikari Plain of Hokkaido, Japan, 2002–2005. Nest tree dbh and nest tree height were compared with the largest tree (MAX) and mean measurement (MEAN) in each nest site.

i0892-1016-41-4-299-t02.gif

Sparrowhawks nested only in evergreen conifers (Table 1). Dbh and tree height of nest trees were greater than mean values in nest sites (t  =  2.84, df  =  13, P < 0.05 and t  =  3.60, df  =  13, P < 0.01, respectively; Table 2). Nest trees had smaller dbh and were shorter than the largest trees in each nest site (t  =  −5.38, df  =  13, P < 0.001 and t  =  −4.27, df  =  13, P < 0.01, respectively).

The results of logistic regression analyses for detecting differences between nest trees of goshawks and sparrowhawks are shown in Table 3. The best logistic regression model included dbh of nest tree; sparrowhawk nest trees were smaller in dbh than those of goshawks.

Table 3

The best five models to detect variables discriminating goshawk nests from sparrowhawk nests in logistic regression analysis. BIC, number of parameters (K) and ΔBIC for each model are provided.

i0892-1016-41-4-299-t03.gif

Nest Site Characteristics

Goshawk nests were located in all forest types, but were frequently in mixed forests (Table 4), and the composition of forest types did not differ between nest sites and random sites (P > 0.05). The measurements of characteristics in nest sites and random sites are shown in Table 5. The best logistic regression model discriminating goshawk nest sites and random sites included distance to the nearest house (Table 6), which was greater for nest sites than for random sites (Table 5).

Table 4

Comparison of forest type of nest sites used by goshawks and sparrowhawks with random sites in the Ishikari Plain of Hokkaido, Japan, 2002–2005.

i0892-1016-41-4-299-t04.gif

Table 5

Characteristics of nest sites of goshawks and sparrowhawks and random sites in the Ishikari Plain of Hokkaido, Japan, 2002–2005.

i0892-1016-41-4-299-t05.gif

Table 6

The models to detect variables discriminating nest sites and random sites in logistic regression analysis. BIC, number of parameters (K) and ΔBIC for each model are provided.

i0892-1016-41-4-299-t06.gif

Most sparrowhawk nests were located in evergreen coniferous forests (Table 4), and the composition of forest types at nest sites differed from that at random sites (P < 0.01). The best logistic regression model to distinguish nest sites from random sites included basal area and distance to the nearest house (Table 6), both of which were greater at nest sites than at random sites (Table 5).

The best logistic regression model detecting the difference between nest sites of each species included only tree density (Table 3). Sparrowhawk nest sites had a higher tree density than goshawk nest sites (Table 5).

Discussion

In the Ishikari Plain, goshawks nested in some of the largest-diameter trees within the nest site. Because a goshawk nest is usually used over several years (Brown and Amadon 1968) and often exceeds 1 m in diameter (Higuchi et al. 1996), a large tree with large branches is required to provide a stable platform for the nest. We suggest that goshawks selected their nesting sites based on stability of nest structure foundations.

Goshawks' nests in our study area were found in a variety of tree species, but nearly half of them were deciduous broad-leaved trees, which usually have larger total diameter of branches supporting a nest than conifers (Lõhmus 2006) and provide nest stability. However, goshawks in other regions in Japan generally nest in conifers (Higuchi et al. 1996) such as Japanese larch (Suzuki 1999) or red pine (Pinus densiflora; Horie et al. 2006). As goshawks appear to choose their nest tree based on structure rather than tree species (Marquiss and Newton 1982, Squires and Reynolds 1997, USFWS 1998), nest tree species vary widely among regions (Cooper and Stevens 2000, Penteriani 2002).

Deciduous broad-leaved trees provide less nest cover than evergreen conifers (Solonen 1982), but we suggest that goshawks in our study area selected trees that offered greater nest stability, rather than overhead cover. Overhead nest cover may not be important in areas with few aerial predators (Lõhmus 2006) or for larger raptors not susceptible to aerial predation. Except for occasional attacks on chicks by conspecifics, goshawks have very few natural aerial predators in the Ishikari Plain. Furthermore, females spend most of their time on or near their nest in early nestling periods (Schnell 1958, Cramp and Simmons 1980), so they are likely to protect their chicks from other goshawks. Goshawks also showed no preference for forest types for nesting in our study area, in contrast to previous studies in which goshawk nests were found primarily in evergreen coniferous forests (Reynolds et al. 1982, Siders and Kennedy 1996, Selås 1997). Our results, in combination with those of other goshawk studies, support the suggestion by Squires and Reynolds (1997) that goshawks nest in both coniferous and deciduous stands, depending on their availability.

Though goshawks have shown a preference for sparse, open forests for nest sites in some previous studies (Penteriani and Faivre 1997, Suzuki 1999), we did not find such tendency in our present study. Goshawks require flight corridors to their nests and adequate flight space around the nests (Hayward and Escano 1989, Squires and Ruggiero 1996, Penteriani 2002); however, the shelterbelts in which most of the nests were located were narrow and the nests were located on the woodlot margins (mean 18.2 m from edge) in our study area; thus, goshawks would not need to choose sparse woodlots as they can easily access their nests in such fragmented habitat.

Sparrowhawks showed a strong preference for evergreen conifers. Dense foliage close to the nest is important as cover, which conceals nests and reduces the probability of predation (Reynolds et al. 1982, Martin 1993). Evergreen conifers may provide more effective cover from aerial predators than deciduous broad-leaved trees, especially at the beginning of incubation when deciduous broad-leaved trees do not have leaves. Sparrowhawks also nested in evergreen coniferous forests, which have a larger basal area and relatively higher tree density than randomly selected forests. Goshawks are one of the primary predators of sparrowhawks (Newton 1986, Selås 1997) and they nest close to sparrowhawks in the Ishikari Plain. It might be advantageous for sparrowhawks to nest in dense evergreen coniferous forests to reduce the probability of detection and attacks by goshawks. Further, sparrowhawks usually build a new nest each year and their nests are small (ca. 60 cm in diameter; Brown and Amadon 1968), so they don't require the large branches offered by deciduous trees for stability of their nests. Therefore, sparrowhawks in our study area appeared to select evergreen coniferous trees and forests that provide protective cover rather than deciduous broad-leaved trees that provide stable platform for building their nests.

In the Ishikari Plains, although nest sites were significantly farther from houses than were random sites, goshawks and sparrowhawks did nest fairly close to human habitations (mean of 247 m and 229 m, respectively). Possibly, the lack of persecution by humans in Japan may enable these species to nest and forage closer to human habitation. However, both species chose nest sites within relatively undisturbed portions of habitat near humans, rather than in places of high human activity. We recommend maintaining a variety of woodlots with an ample number of sufficiently large deciduous and coniferous trees for the conservation and management of goshawks and sparrowhawks in the Ishikari Plains and other areas where nesting habitat is limited.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to S. Shiraki for her helpful comments on this study. We especially thank T. Kubo and M. Akasaka for their advice and support on the statistical methods, and S. Tsuyusaki for his information on vegetation science.

Literature Cited

1.

D. M. Bird, D. E. Varland, and J. J. Negro , editors. 1996. Raptors in human landscapes. Academic Press. New York, NY, U.S.A. Google Scholar

2.

L. Brown and D. Amadon . 1968. Eagles, hawks, and falcons of the world. McGraw-Hill. New York, NY, U.S.A. Google Scholar

3.

K. P. Burnham and D. R. Anderson . 1998. Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag. New York, NY, U.S.A. Google Scholar

4.

T. J. Cade 1982. Falcons of the world. William Collins Sons and Co. Ltd. London, U.K. Google Scholar

5.

M. L. Cody 1985. An introduction to habitat selection in birds. 3–56. in M. L. Cody , editor. Habitat selection in birds. Academic Press. London, U.K. Google Scholar

6.

J. M. Cooper and V. Stevens . 2000. A review of the ecology, management and conservation of the Northern Goshawk in British Columbia. Ministry of Environment, Lands, and Parks, Wildlife Branch. Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. Google Scholar

7.

S. Cramp and K. E. L. Simmons , editors. 1980. Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa: the birds of the western palearctic. Vol. 2. Oxford Univ. Press. Oxford, U.K. Google Scholar

8.

D. C. Crocker-Bedford 1990. Goshawk reproduction and forest management. Wildl. Soc. Bull 18:262–269. Google Scholar

9.

Geographical Survey Institute of Japan 1997. Digital Map 25000 (Map Image) CD-ROM.  Google Scholar

10.

Y. Hayashi 1997. Study on the conservation biology of Blakiston's Fish Owl (Ketupa blakistoni). Ph.D. dissertation,. Hokkaido Univ. Sapporo, Japan. (In Japanese). Google Scholar

11.

G. D. Hayward and R. E. Escano . 1989. Goshawk nest-site characteristics in western Montana and northern Idaho. Condor 91:476–479. Google Scholar

12.

H. Higuchi, H. Morioka, and S. Yamagishi , editors. 1996. The encyclopedia of animals in Japan Vol. 4 Birds. Heibonsha Ltd. Press. Tokyo, Japan. (In Japanese). Google Scholar

13.

Hokkaido Forestry Kaikan 1983. Hokkaido forest history. Hokkaido Forestry Kaikan Press. Sapporo, Japan. (In Japanese). Google Scholar

14.

R. Horie, K. Endo, J. Nonaka, H. Funatsumaru, and M. Koganezawa . 2006. Nest site selection of Northern Goshawk Accipiter gentilis in Nasunogahara, Tochigi Prefecture, central Japan. Jpn. J. Ornithol 55:41–47. (In Japanese with English summary). Google Scholar

15.

F. C. James and H. H. Shugart Jr . 1970. A quantitative method of habitat description. Audubon Field Notes 24:30–37. Google Scholar

16.

R. E. Kenward 1982. Goshawk hunting behaviour and range size as a function of food and habitat availability. J. Anim. Ecol 51:69–80. Google Scholar

17.

R. E. Kenward 1996. Goshawk adaptation to deforestation: does Europe differ from North America. 233–243. in D. M. Bird, D. E. Varland, and J. J. Negro , editors. Raptors in human landscapes. Academic Press. New York, NY, U.S.A. Google Scholar

18.

O. Krüger 2002. Analysis of nest occupancy and nest reproduction in two sympatric raptors: Common Buzzard Buteo buteo and goshawk Accipiter gentilis. Ecography 25:523–532. Google Scholar

19.

A. Lõhmus 2005. Are timber harvesting and conservation of nest sites of forest-dwelling raptors always mutually exclusive. Anim. Conserv 8:443–450. Google Scholar

20.

A. Lõhmus 2006. Nest-tree and nest-stand characteristics of forest-dwelling raptors in east-central Estonia: implications for forest management and conservation. Proc. Est. Acad. Sci. Biol. Ecol 55:31–50. Google Scholar

21.

M. Marquiss and I. Newton . 1982. The goshawk in Britain. Br. Birds 75:243–260. Google Scholar

22.

T. E. Martin 1993. Nest predation and nest sites: new perspectives on old patterns. BioScience 43:523–532. Google Scholar

23.

C. McCarthy, W. D. Carrier, and W. F. Laudenslayer . 1989. Coordinating timber management activities with raptor nesting habitat requirements. 229–235. in B. G. Pendleton , editor. Proceedings of the Western Raptor Management Symposium and Workshop. Natl. Wildl. Fed. Sci. Tech. Ser., No. 12. Port City Press, Inc. Baltimore, MD, U.S.A. Google Scholar

24.

T. Morioka, T. Kanouchi, T. Kawata, and N. Yamagata . 1995. The bird of prey in Japan. Bun-ichi Co. Ltd. Press. Tokyo, Japan. (In Japanese). Google Scholar

25.

I. Newton 1979. Population ecology of raptors. T. and A.D. Poyser Ltd. Berkhamsted, U.K. Google Scholar

26.

I. Newton 1986. The sparrowhawk. T. and A.D. Poyser Ltd. Calton, U.K. Google Scholar

27.

I. Newton 1991. Habitat variation and population regulation in sparrowhawks. Ibis 133:76–88. Google Scholar

28.

V. Penteriani 2002. Goshawk nesting habitat in Europe and North America: a review. Ornis Fenn 79:149–163. Google Scholar

29.

V. Penteriani and B. Faivre . 1997. Breeding density and nest site selection in a goshawk Accipiter gentilis population of the central Apennines (Abruzzo, Italy). Bird Study 44:136–145. Google Scholar

30.

G. P. Quinn and M. J. Keough . 2002. Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge Univ. Press. U.K. Google Scholar

31.

R. T. Reynolds, E. C. Meslow, and H. M. Wight . 1982. Nesting habitat of coexisting Accipiter in Oregon. J. Wildl. Manage 46:124–138. Google Scholar

32.

C. S. Robbins, D. K. Dawson, and B. A. Dowell . 1989. Habitat area requirements of breeding forest birds of the middle Atlantic states. Wildl. Monogr 87:1–64. Google Scholar

33.

J. H. Schnell 1958. Nesting behavior and food habits of goshawks in the Sierra Nevada of California. Condor 60:377–403. Google Scholar

34.

V. Selås 1997. Nest-site selection by four sympatric forest raptors in southern Norway. J. Raptor Res 31:16–25. Google Scholar

35.

K. Shimoda, S. Nakano, M. Inoue, and Y. Ono . 1993. Present condition of stream fish assemblage in the Shiretoko peninsula with special reference to human impacts. Hokkaido Univ. Bull. Grad. School Environ. Sci 6:17–27. (In Japanese with English summary). Google Scholar

36.

M. S. Siders and P. L. Kennedy . 1996. Forest structural characteristics of Accipiter nesting habitat: is there an allometric relationships. Condor 98:123–132. Google Scholar

37.

T. Solonen 1982. Nest-sites of the Common Buzzard Buteo buteo in Finland. Ornis Fenn 59:191–192. Google Scholar

38.

J. R. Squires and R. T. Reynolds . 1997. Northern Goshawk (Accipiter gentilis). in A. Poole and F. Gill , editors. The birds of North America, No. 298. The Academy of Natural Sciences. Philadelphia, PA and The American Ornithologists' Union. Washington, DC, U.S.A. Google Scholar

39.

J. R. Squires and L. F. Ruggiero . 1996. Nest-site preference of Northern Goshawks in southcentral Wyoming. J. Wildl. Manage 60:170–177. Google Scholar

40.

T. Suzuki 1999. Nesting habitat of the Northern Goshawk Accipiter gentilis in the Tokachi plain, eastern Hokkaido. Jpn. J. Ornithol 48:135–144. (In Japanese with English summary). Google Scholar

41.

T. Takenaka 1998. Distribution, habitat environments, and reasons for reduction of the endangered Blakiston's Fish Owl (Ketupa blakistoni). Ph.D. dissertation. Hokkaido Univ. Sapporo, Japan. Google Scholar

42.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1998. Status review of the Northern Goshawk in the forested west. U.S.D.I. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Technical Support–Forest Resources. Portland, OR, U.S.A.  http://pacific.fws.gov/news/pdf/gh_sr.pdf.  Google Scholar

43.

J. van Diermen 1996. Sparrowhawks (Accipiter nisus) breeding in village, rural landscape and forest. Levende Nat 97:43–52. (In Dutch with English summary). Google Scholar
Fumiko Abe, Osamu Hasegawa, Takuma Kudo, and Seigo Higashi "NEST-SITE SELECTION OF NORTHERN GOSHAWKS AND EURASIAN SPARROWHAWKS IN A FRAGMENTED LANDSCAPE IN NORTHERN JAPAN," Journal of Raptor Research 41(4), 299-306, (1 December 2007). https://doi.org/10.3356/0892-1016(2007)41[299:NSONGA]2.0.CO;2
Received: 4 June 2006; Accepted: 1 July 2007; Published: 1 December 2007
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top