Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2012 Development and Evaluation of Methods to Assess Populations of Black Flies (Diptera: Simuliidae) at Nests of the Endangered Whooping Crane (Grus americana)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Hematophagous insects can negatively affect the reproductive success of their vertebrate hosts. To determine the influence of hematophagous insects on endangered vertebrates requires specially designed programs that minimize disturbance to the hosts and address problems associated with their small populations. We developed and evaluated a surveillance program for black flies potentially affecting a population of whooping cranes (Grus americana) introduced to central Wisconsin, U.S.A. In one of the few studies to survey host-seeking female black flies and their immature stages concurrently, we processed nearly 346,000 specimens and documented 26 species, of which only two, Simulium annulus and Simulium johannseni, were attracted to nesting whooping cranes. Attempts to assess black fly populations with artificial nests and real crane eggs were unsuccessful. Carbon-dioxide traps performed well in describing black fly taxa on the landscape. However, the number of black flies at whooping crane nests was consistently higher than the number captured in carbon-dioxide traps. The carbon-dioxide traps poorly described the presence/absence, population fluctuations, and periodicity of black flies at whooping crane nests. The weak performance of the carbon-dioxide traps might have resulted from microhabitat differences between trap locations and nests or from Simulium annulus and Simulium johannseni using sensory cues in addition to carbon dioxide to find hosts. Choice of trapping techniques, therefore, depends on the information required for the particular study objectives.

Richard S. King and Peter H. Adler "Development and Evaluation of Methods to Assess Populations of Black Flies (Diptera: Simuliidae) at Nests of the Endangered Whooping Crane (Grus americana)," Journal of Vector Ecology 37(2), 298-306, (1 December 2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7134.2012.00231.x
Received: 26 December 2011; Accepted: 1 February 2012; Published: 1 December 2012
JOURNAL ARTICLE
9 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top