Translator Disclaimer
1 September 2010 Population Systems of the Pelophylax esculentus Complex in the Southern Part of Its Range
Imre I. Krizmanić, Ana T. Ivanović
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

We explored the population systems of Pelophylax esculentus at the southern border of the distribution range for this complex. We used both morphological data and allozyme markers to describe population systems in this region. All three taxa in the complex, P. ridibundus, P. lessonae and their hybridogenetic form, P. kl. esculentus occurred in the research area. In four localities that were analysed near the Danube River, we found complex population systems of both the parent species and their hybridogenetic form. Southward from the border defined by the Sava and Danube riverbanks, only the P. ridibundusP. kl. esculentus (R-E) system was detected. Among these R-E populations, the abundance of the hybridogenetic form declines sharply from the north to the south. The most common and widespread system in Central Europe, the P. lessonaeP. kl. esculentus population system, was detected in only one locality near the Sava River.

Introduction

Pelophylax kl. esculentus is a widespread natural hybrid that is produced as offspring of the parent species P. lessonae (Camerano, 1882) and P. ridibundus (Pallas, 1771). The hybrids can reproduce by hybridogenesis, in which the set of chromosomes that is derived from one parental species is completely discarded, while the set from the other parental species undergoes compensatory duplication. Pelophylax kl. esculentus gametes thus contain an unrecombined genome derived from one parental species (Hotz et al. 1985, Graf & Polls-Pelaz 1989, Berger 1990, Tunner & Hepich Tunner 1992, Ragghianti et al. 2007).

The geographical patterns and population systems composition of the western Palearctic water frogs complex (P. esculentus complex) have been well-studied over a significant part of their distribution range, especially in areas where all three forms co-occur. Seven different systems have generally been described that differ in composition with respect to the presence of each taxon, their relative abundance and reproductive relationships (e.g. Graf & Polls-Pelaz 1989, Berger 1990, Plötner & Grunwald 1991, Plötner et al. 1994, Rybacki & Berger 2001, Borkin et al. 2002). Despite the considerable amount of available data, our knowledge about the occurrence, distribution and structure of western Palearctic water frog population systems at the southern border of their distribution range remains very limited (Spasić Bošković et al. 1999). Pelophylax ridibundus is a widespread species throughout Serbia. However, the location and population structure of P. lessonae in this area is largely unknown. The scarce data that do exist on the distribution of P. lessonae are from the region north of the Danube and Sava Rivers (e.g., Karaman 1948). The available data for the hybrid taxa (P. kl. esculentus) are also mostly from the northern Pannonian and peri-Pannonian parts of Serbia (Radovanović 1951, Radovanović 1964, Spasić 1996, Spasić Bošković et al. 1999, Džukić et al. 2001, Krizmanić 2008).

The aim of this study was to examine the presence, geographical distribution patterns, and species composition of the western group of Palearctic water frogs at the southern border of their range, which is partially within the territory of Serbia. More specifically, we attempted to establish the southern distribution limit of P. lessonae in the peri-Pannonian part of Serbia along its major rivers.

Material and Methods

We examined frog populations from 15 sites (Fig. 1). In total, 388 specimens were collected for morphometric analysis. For each frog, we measured ten traits: body length (L), femur length (F), tibia length (T), internasal distance (Spi), maximum head width (Ltc), length of the first toe of hind leg (DpPp), metatarsal tubercle length (Cint), minimal interorbital distance (Spp), snout-eye distance (Dro), diameter of the tympanic membrane (Ltym). All measurements were performed by the same person (I.K.) using digital callipers (0.1 mm accuracy). To explore morphological variation among taxa, we analyzed 18 indices of external morphological characteristics (L/F, L/T, L/Spi, L/Ltc, L/DpPp, L/Cint, L/Spp, L/Dro, L/Ltym, F/T, F/DpPp, F/Cint, T/DpPp, T/Cint, DpPp/Cint, SPi/Spp, Ltc/Dro, and Ltc/Lc) using one-way ANOVA and discriminant analysis (Krizmanić 2008). For all statistical analyses, we used the statistical software package Statistica for Windows 6.0 (StatSoft 2001).

Fig. 1.

Distribution of population systems in the southern part of the complex range, with the proportion of each registered taxa.

f01_215.jpg

Electrophoretic variability was analysed for three loci in the total sample of 388 specimens and for one locus (PGDH) on a reduced sample of 357 specimens. Enzymes were evaluated on an 11.5% starch gel system using standard procedures (Murphy 1996). We analysed four enzyme loci: glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (G3PDH EC 1.1.1.8), (Formerly: a glycerophosphate dehydrogenase — a GPD or a GPDH); glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH, EC 1.1.1.49); L — lactate dehydrogenase (LDH-1 EC 1.1.1.27); phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (PGDH, EC 1.1.1.44) (Formerly: 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase — 6 PGD or 6 PGDH). The nomenclature of enzymes and E. C. numbers followed Murphy et al. (1996). For all genetic analyses, we used the TFPGA 1.3 software package (Miller 1997). Accordingly, identification of taxa was accomplished by combining both the distinctive morphometric indices (Schneider et al. 1984, Günther et al. 1991, Pagano & Joly 1999, Lode & Pagano 2000) and the selected polymorphic loci (Günther et al. 1991, Beerli 1994, Kotlík 1996).

List of localities with coordinates of latitude and longitude and numbers of investigated individuals

  1. Dubovački rit 44° 47.727′ /21° 12.779′ /20;

  2. Velika bara 44° 49.712′ /21° 18.921′ /30;

  3. Lokva 44° 50.365′ /21° 18.404′ /31;

  4. Dulin bara 44° 51.220′ /21° 18.299′ /28;

  5. Donji Milanovac 44° 27.995′ /22° 09.405′ /29;

  6. Kladovo 44° 36.692′ /22° 36.910′ /30;

  7. Negotin 44° 13.570′ /22° 32.182′ /28;

  8. Zaječar 43° 47.190′ /22° 18.818′ /30;

  9. Šalinci 44° 41.340′ /21° 00.800′ /30;

  10. Svilajnac 44° 13.950′/ 21° 12.105′ /23;

  11. Kruševac 43° 39.390′ /21° 23.390′ /29;

  12. Niš 43° 24.240′ /21° 47.100′ /30;

  13. Leskovac 42° 52.970′ /21° 53.425′ /21;

  14. Kraljevo 43° 47.770′/ 20° 35.620′ /10;

  15. Obedska Bara 44° 44.200′ /19° 59.620′ /19.

Table 1.

Descriptive characteristics and comparison of selected morphometric indices among examined taxa (SD, standard deviation; DpPp, length of the first toe of hind leg; Cint, metatarsal tubercle length; T, tibia length; L, body length; F, femur length).

t01_215.gif

Results

Results of ANOVA demonstrated that morphometric ratios differed significantly among taxa (Table 1). The indices producing the highest degree of separation between the taxa were DpPp/Cint, T/Cint, L/T and F/T. Discriminate analyses based on the ANOVA results showed clear separation of the parental species (Fig. 2, Fig. 3). The range of variation of the morphological features ratios in P. kl. esculentus populations was within the range of variation of both parent species (Fig. 3).

Table 2.

Allozymic variation detected among the three water frog taxa.

t02_215.gif

The relative electrophoretic mobility of the allelic products was used for diagnostic purposes (Table 2). The fastest alleles (a) for both LDH and G3PDH were characteristic of individuals that were identified as P. ridibundus based on morphometry. The second allozyme phenotype was a marker for P. lessonae and included homozygotes for the G3PDH (b), LDH (c) and PGDH (a). All animals heterozygotic for G3PDH and LDH, were P. kl. esculentus. The next group included individuals heterozygous for LDH (a/c or b/c) and homozygous for G3PDH (b), and, significant differences in morphometry were not recognized between this group and animals identified as P. lessonae. Pelophylax kl. esculentus revealed a heterozygotic (a/b) phenotype for G6PDH and a heterozygotic (a/c or a/b) phenotype for PGDH.

According to both morphological and genetic data, three population systems occurred in our study area: P. ridibundus — P. lessonae — P. kl. esculentus (R-L-E), P. lessonae — P. kl. esculentus (L-E), and P. ridibundus — P. kl. esculentus (R-E) (Fig. 1). Pelophylax ridibundus was recorded almost throughout the entire research area and was the most abundant species of water frogs in the system as a whole (except for populations, No. 11 and 15). The second parental species (P. lessonae) was restricted to two systems, R-L-E and L-E. Interestingly, we did not find “pure” ridibundus populations. The L-E population system occurred in one locality only (Obedska bara, No. 15).

Fig. 2.

Position of the group centroids in the projection of the first and the second canonical variants.

f02_215.jpg

Discussion

Our results indicate that the R-E-L system could be the most frequent system in the border area towards the east. Pelophylax lessonae, which was the least abundant species in our study population, propagates along major rivers throughout Serbia (especially the Sava and the Danube Rivers), and thus it seems likely that P. lessonae inhabits a much wider area (Colganiceanu & Tesio 1993). The hybridogenetic species (P. kl. esculentus) occurred in all localities that we investigated with a level of relative abundance that varied between the localities. The R-E-L system is considered to be rare in Europe (Berger 1990, Lada et al. 1995, Rybacki & Berger 2001, Borkin et al. 2002). Formerly, it was found in Serbia only at the Obedska bara locality (Spasić Bošković et al. 1999). However, in our investigations, we found this system in four localities: 1, 2, 3 and 9, all within the Danube River area (Fig. 1).

Fig. 3.

Relative position of individuals in the projection of the first and the second canonical variants.

f03_215.jpg

Although the L-E system represents the most frequent genome combination encountered in central Europe (see Graf & Polls-Pelaz 1989, Berger 1990, Plötner & Grunwald 1991, Rybacki & Berger 2001, Pagano et al. 2001), we recorded this system in only one locality (Fig. 1). Previously, in the same region (Spasić 1996), P. ridibundus individuals were detected at a frequency 20% of the water frog population, while three years later, their frequency was only 3% in the population samples that we analysed (Spasić Bošković et al. 1999). It is important to point out that we found only P. kl. esculentus females at this locality. This finding indicates the possibility that the hybridogenetic females that cross with the males produce only esculentus females (Tunner 1974, 1980). At the same time, the L-E population system was found at only two localities close to the Danube River (Spasić Bošković et al. 1999). Longstanding uncontrolled hunting of and trade in water frogs (Džukić et al. 2001) are serious threats that could lead to the extinction of this taxa through causing changes to their population structures and to the type of population systems that are encountered. We believe that the L-E system might also be found towards the north, in the Vojvodina province. This presumption is based on the published records of similar population systems in the surrounding areas (Berger 1990, Gubányi & Korsós 1992, Tunner & Heppich Tunner 1992).

Populations belonging to the R-E system are less widespread than L-E populations (Graf & Polls-Pelaz 1989). Nevertheless, they have been found throughout a considerable part of the range of the water frog complex (Uzzell & Berger 1975, Berger 1990, Tunner & Heppich Tunner 1992, Plötner et al. 1994, Pagano et al. 2001, Rybacki & Berger 2001, Borkin et al. 2004a, b). R-E populations occurred predominately within the distribution area of their parent species. We found the R-E system only outside of the P. lessonae distribution range.

Overall, the R-E population system was found to spread southwards from the Sava and the Danube Rivers, apart from locality No. 4 that was located on the left bank of the Danube River. At all of the investigated localities where the R-E population systems were recorded, P. ridibundus was the numerically more abundant species (Fig. 1). Abundance of the hybrid “species” was considerably lower towards the south, where it was found at a frequency of approximately 20% overall. In particular, hybrids were found southwards from the Western Morava River and the town of Zaječar. However, in locality No. 12, further to the south, the abundance of P. kl. esculentus increased (26%). Contrary to our expectation to find the R-E-L and L-E population systems of water frogs north of the Sava and the Danube Rivers along with the “pure” esculentus-esculentus populations (Spasić Bošković et al. 1999), we did not find any record of “pure” populations of any of the taxa that we studied at any locality.

The sex ratio of the hybrid taxa is an important characteristic of the R-E system (Uzzell et al. 1977, Rybacki 1994a, b, Pagano et al. 1997, Ragghianti et al. 2007). There was a declining trend in the number of females compared to males P. kl. esculentus from the north to the south. In northern populations the percentage of females varied from 33.3% (loc. 1.) to 100% (loc. 15.). In southern populations, these percentages varied from 20% (loc. 10.) to 0% (localities 11, 13 and 14). The source of this sex-ratio variation is unknown. Previous studies suggested that R-E systems with hybrid males may experience exclusion of both the ridibundus and lessonae genomes, such that, they will produce sperm only containing the lessonae or ridibundus genome, or, possibly, containing a mixture of both genomes (see Ragghianti et al. 2007). Investigations of the R-E system have also indicated the existence of populations with different sex and genetic structures and the possibility of exclusion of either the ridibundus or lessonae genomes in male hybrid forms (Uzzell et al. 1977, Rybacki 1994a, b, Pagano et al. 1997, Ragghianti et al. 2007).

In conclusion, our investigations suggest that areas north of the Danube and Sava Rivers are inhabited with all three taxa. However, the proportion of taxa in mixed populations and their sex ratios varied substantially within the study area. The limited presence of a hybrid “species” with extremely rare females, in the central and southern parts of the investigated area, may indicate that (1) P. ridibundus fluctuate geographically in the capability of its genome to induce hybridogenetic gametogenesis (Hotz et al. 1985) and (2) lessonae and ridibundus genomes were either excluded or mixed in male hybrid forms (Ragghianti et al. 2007).

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the useful comments and careful reading of the manuscript by M. Kalezić. The collection of specimens from the analysed localities was approved by licence for collection No. 02-868/2 issued to order by the Nature Protection Institute of Serbia. This study was financed by the Serbian Ministry for the Protection of Natural Resources and Environment, No. 401-00-00468/2003-01.

Literature

1.

Beerli P. 1994: Genetic isolation and calibration of an average protein clock in western Palearctic water frogs of the Aegean region. Inaugural Dissertation, Philosophischen Fakultat, Zurich: 92Google Scholar

2.

Berger L. 1990: On the origin of genetic system in European water frog hybrids. Zoologica Poloniae 35 (1–4): 5–31. Google Scholar

3.

Borkin L.J., Litvinchuk S.N., Mannapova E.I., Pestov M.V. & Rosanov J.M. 2002: The distribution of green frogs (Rana esculenta complex) in Nizhny Novgorod Province, Central European Russia. Russian J. Herpetol. 9 (3): 195–208. Google Scholar

4.

Borkin L.J., Litvinchuk S.N., Rosanov J.M. & Skorinov V.D. 2004a: On cryptic species (an example of Amphibians). Entomol. Rev. 84: S75–S98. Google Scholar

5.

Borkin L.J., Korshunov V.A., Lada A.G., Litvinchuk S.N., Rosanov J.M., Shabanov A.D. & Zinenko I.A. 2004b: Mass occurrence of polyploid green frogs (Rana esculenta complex) in eastern Ukraine. Russian J. Herpetol. 11 (3): 194–213. Google Scholar

6.

Colganiceanu D. & Tesio C. 1993: On the presence of Rana lessonae in Rumania. Amphibia-Reptilia 14: 90–93. Google Scholar

7.

Džukić G., Kalezić M.L., Ljubisavljević K.M. & Krizmanić I. 2001: The integrative analysis of exploitation of the green frogs in SR Yugoslavia. The Final Reports I & II. Federal Secretariat of Labour, Health and Social Care, Serbia: 99. (in Serbian)  Google Scholar

8.

Graf J.D. & Polls-Pelaz M. 1989: Evolutionary genetics of the Rana esculenta complex. In: Dawley R.M. & Bogart J.P. (eds.), Evolution and ecology of unisexual vertebrates. New York State Mus Bull 466 , New York : 289–302. Google Scholar

9.

Gubányi A. & Korsós Z. 1992: Morphological analysis of two Hungarian water frog (Rana lessonae-esculenta) populations. Amphibia — Reptilia 13: 235–243. Google Scholar

10.

Günther R., Plötner J. & Tetzlaff I. 1991: Zu einigen Merkmalen der Wasserfrösche (Rana synkl. esculenta) des Donau — Deltas. Salamandra 27: 246–265. Google Scholar

11.

Hotz H., Mancino G., Bucci-Innocenti S., Ragghianti M., Berger L. & Uzelli T. 1985: Rana ridibunda varies geographically in inducing clonal gametogenesis in interspecies hybrids. J. Exp. Zool. 236: 199–210. Google Scholar

12.

Karaman L.S. 1948: Prilog herpetologiji sjeverne Srbije. Prirodoslovna istraživanja JAZU 24: 51–73. Google Scholar

13.

Kotlík P. 1996: Hybridogenesis in water frogs: Genetic analysis of populations of Rana esculenta complex in the Czech Republic (Amphibia, Ranidae). Thesis, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in PragueGoogle Scholar

14.

Krizmanić I. 2008: Water frogs (Rana esculenta complex) in Serbia — morphological data. Arch. Biol. Sci. 60: 449–457. Google Scholar

15.

Lada G.A., Borkin L.J. & Vinogradov E.A. 1995: Distribution, population system and reproductive behavior of green frogs hybridogenetic (Rana esculenta complex) in Central chernozem territory of Russia. Russian J. Herpetol. 2: 146–157. Google Scholar

16.

Lode T. & Pagano A. 2000: Variations in call and morphology in male water frogs: Taxonomic and evolutionary implications. C. R. Acad. Sci., Ser. III 323: 995–1001. Google Scholar

17.

Miller M.P. 1997: Tools for population genetic analysis (TFPGA) 13. Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University , FlagstaffGoogle Scholar

18.

Murphy R.W., Sites J.W., Buth D.G. & Haufler C.H. 1996: Proteins — isozyme electrophoresis. In: Hillis et al. (eds.), Molecular systematics. Sunderland, Sinauer Associates Inc , 2nd ed. Massachusetts : 51–120. Google Scholar

19.

Pagano A. & Joly P. 1999: Limits of the morphometric method for field indentication of water frogs. Alytes 16 (3–4): 130–138. Google Scholar

20.

Pagano A., Crochet P.A., Graf J.D., Joly P. & Lode T. 2001: Distribution and habitat use of water frog hybrid complexes in France. Global Ecology & Biogeography 10: 433–441. Google Scholar

21.

Pagano A., Joly P. & Hotz H. 1997: Taxon composition and genetic variation of water frogs in the Mid-Rhone floodplain. C. R. Acad. Sci., Ser. III 320: 759–766. Google Scholar

22.

Plötner J. & Grunwald C. 1991: A mathematical model of the structure and the dynamics of Rana ridibunda/esculenta -♂♂- populations (Anura, Ranidae). Z. Zool. Syst. Evolut.-forsch. 29: 201–207. Google Scholar

23.

Plötner J., Becker C. & Plötner K. 1994: Morphometric and DNA investigations into European water frogs Rana kl. esculenta synklepton (Anura, Ranidae) from different population systems. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 32: 193–210. Google Scholar

24.

Radovanović M. 1951: Vodozemci i gmizavci naše zemlje [Amphibians and reptails our country]. Naučna knjiga , Beograd . (in Serbian)  Google Scholar

25.

Radovanović M. 1964: Die Verbreitung der Amphibien und Reptilien in Jugoslawien. Senck. Biol. 45 (3/5): 553–561. Google Scholar

26.

Ragghianti M., Bucci S., Marracci S., Casola C., Mancino G., Hotz H., Guex D.G., Plötner J. & Uzell T. 2007: Gametogenesis of intergroup hybrids of hemiclonal frogs. Genet. Res. 89: 39–45. Google Scholar

27.

Rybacki M. ( 1994a): Structure of water frogs populations (Rana esculenta complex) of the Wolin Island, Poland. Zoologica Poloniae 39 (3–4): 345–364. Google Scholar

28.

Rybacki M. ( 1994b): Water frogs (Rana esculenta compleks) of the Bornholm Island, Denmark. Zoologica Poloniae 39 (3–4): 331–344. Google Scholar

29.

Rybacki M. & Berger L. 2001: Types of frog populations (Rana esculenta complex) in Poland. Mitt. Mus. Natkd. Berl. Zool. Reiche 771: 51–57. Google Scholar

30.

Schneider H., Sofianidou T.S. & Kyriakopoulou-Sklavounou P. 1984: Bioacustic and morphometric studies in water frogs (genus Rana) of Lake Ioannina in Grece, and description of a new species (Anura, Amphibia). Z. Zool. Syst. Evolut.-forsch. 22: 349–366. Google Scholar

31.

Spasić O. 1996: Komparativna citogenetička analiza hromozomskih komplementa vrsta roda Rana (Anura, Amphibia) sa područja Jugoslavije [Comparative cytogenetic analysis of species of the genus Rana (Anura, Amphibia) from Yugoslavia]. Magister thesis, Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade. (in Serbian)  Google Scholar

32.

Spasić Bošković O., Krizmanić I. & Vujošević M. 1999: Population composition and genetic variation of water frogs (Anura: Ranidae) from Yugoslavia. Caryologia 52: 9–20. Google Scholar

33.

StatSoft INC. 2001: Statistica for Windows 6.0 (Computer program manual). Tulsa 3rd ed.  Google Scholar

34.

Tunner H.G. 1974: Die Klonale struktur einer Wasserfrösche population. Z. Zool. Syst. Evolut.-forsch. 10: 127–132. Google Scholar

35.

Tunner H.G. 1980: Kreuzungsexperimente mit Wasserfröschen aus österreichischen und polnischen Mischpopulationen (Rana lessonae + Rana esculenta) — Eine Analyse biochemischer und morphologischer Merkmale. Z. Zool. Syst. Evol. 18: 257–297. Google Scholar

36.

Tunner H.G. & Heppich Tunner S. 1992: A new population system of water frogs discovered in Hungary. In: Korsós Z. & Kiss I. (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Ordinary General Meeting of the Societas Europaea Herpetologica, Budapest : 453–460. Google Scholar

37.

Uzzell T. & Berger L. 1975: Electrophoretic phenotypes of Rana ridibunda, Rana lessonae and their hybridogenetic associate Rana esculenta. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 127 (2): 13–24. Google Scholar

38.

Uzzell T., Günther R. & Berger L. 1977: Rana ridibunda and Rana esculenta: A leaky hybridogenetic system (Amphibia, Salientia). Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 128: 147–171. Google Scholar
Imre I. Krizmanić and Ana T. Ivanović "Population Systems of the Pelophylax esculentus Complex in the Southern Part of Its Range," Folia Zoologica 59(3), 215-222, (1 September 2010). https://doi.org/10.25225/fozo.v59.i3.a7.2010
Received: 10 March 2008; Accepted: 1 July 2010; Published: 1 September 2010
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top