Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2015 Assessment of the habitat quality of the forest dormouse (Dryomys nitedula) in Daghestan, Russia: role of foods and vegetation structure
Author Affiliations +

The suitability of two forest biotopes (oak and hornbeam-beech forests) for occupation by D. nitedula in Daghestan, Russia is considered. Biotopes have been characterized according to 11 parameters. All 11 vegetation parameters were significantly different between study areas. The indices of D. nitedula success in the studied biotopes demonstrated that numbers were higher in an oak forest than in a hornbeam-beech forest. Estimates of microhabitat distribution showed that D. nitedula individuals prefer to live in shrub associations and in areas with young trees in both biotopes. The body weight of adults and reproduction rate were similar in both biotopes. We concluded that in situation when the body weight and reproduction rates of individual D. nitedula were similar but the numbers of species in the both forest biotopes significantly differ, the structure of woody-shrub vegetation becomes a significant factor.


Arboreal rodents are one of the specialized and numerous groups of animals inhabiting the forest canopy, finding both refuge and food there (Malcolm & Ray 2000, Vasquez et al. 2002). The presence of natural hollows in trees or the possibility of convenient movement among the crowns of trees and shrubs can determine the occurrence or absence of a species in a biotope (Adler 2000, Di Bitetti 2001).

The forest dormouse (Dryomys nitedula Pallas, 1779) is a semi-arboreal species, the most widely distributed species of the family Gliridae (Airapetyants 1983, Rossolimo et al. 2001). Regrettably there are many areas where information about it is scarce. In Daghestan D. nitedula is widespread, but the main population occurs in the foothill zone (Airapetyants 1983, Magomedov et al. 2012). Daghestan, especially its mountain part, is characterized by a hilly landscape, even nearby sites located on different slopes can differ in microclimatic conditions, vegetation structure and productivity. Such a wide spectrum of habitat conditions should affect forest dormice in different areas of Daghestan.

In this paper the role of the forest canopy structure and its productivity are assessed as factors capable of determining the state of D. nitedula in different forest biotopes. Food is a fundamental factor determining the state of any species (Magomedov & Magomedov 2008) and at the same time, the structure of woody shrub vegetation could be no less important in one or another part of the forest (Likhachev 1972). The purpose of this study was to estimate the suitability of two typical forest biotopes for the forest dormouse in Daghestan.

Material and Methods

Study area — selection of experimental plots

Daghestan is the southernmost region of Russia, located in the northeastern Caucasus. The study was performed in the foothill zone of Daghestan during five years (2002–2004, 2009–2010). Two typical areas were selected: lower foothill (250–400 m a.s.l., 45° 54′ 34′′ N, 47° 27′ 37′′ E) - oak forest and upper foothill (750–800 m a.s.l., 41° 39′ 21′′ N, 47° 59′ 59′′ E) - hornbeam-beech forest (Fig. 1).

The foothill zone of Daghestan forms a multitude of ridges separated by valleys, basins, and canyons (Akaev et al. 1996). The climate here is moderately warm. Winters are characterized by comparatively mild temperatures with the average of three winter months around +1.5 °C, and a summer average of +17 °C (Akaev et al. 1996). The vegetation is composed mainly of oak, beech, and beech-hornbeam types of forest (Lvov 1964).

Fig. 1.

Study area.


Handling of animals

To estimate the relative abundance of D. nitedula, standard trap-lines of Gero traps were used (Kucheruk 2006). Each night from 50 to 100 traps were set at 3–5 m intervals. All abundance data were standardized “as catch per 100 trap-nights”. During the entire period of the studies there were 4870 trap-nights employed and 173 animals were caught. In addition, numbers of D. nitedula nests per route line (10 km) were recorded. In order not to count accidentally the nests of birds, each nest was checked to determine its inhabitants. All the animals captured were weighed, had their body length measured and sex determined. To describe rates of reproduction, the following parameters were used: size (volume) of testes (using sliding calipers accurate to 0.01 cm), sex ratio and percentage of breeding females. Volume of testes were calculated using formula of ellipse V = 4/3 π*a*b*c, where a, b, c are axes of testes. The percentage of females participating in reproduction was determined from the relationship between the number of reproducing, lactating females and the total number of females caught. Animals were divided into two age groups: juvenile (≤ 19.5 g) and adult (> 19.5 g), following Kryštufek (1985).


For botanical description, 11 parameters were selected: density, height and diameter of trees (at the chest level), closeness of their crowns, production of seeds. For shrubs, the density, height and diameter (at the chest level), closeness of their crowns and protective cover were recorded, as well as the production of grasses (Voronov 1973). Six sites were selected and in each one geobotanical description was performed in four plots. Trees and shrubs were described at plots with an area of 50 × 50 m, and grass vegetation, 1 × 1 m. Production of seeds and root crops was determined by using plots of 1.0 m2, and samples were dried to constant mass and weighed. STATISTICA 5.0 was used for r analysis of the empirical data obtained (Borovikov 2001).

Fig. 2.

Vertical distribution of D. nitedula nests in an oak forest (а, n = 90 per 10 km transect) and in a hornbeam-beech forest (b, n = 36 per 10 km transect).


Table 1.

Vegetation characteristic of habitats of D. nitedula.


Table 2.

Dynamics of numbers of D. nitedula (ind./100 trap-nights).


Table 3.

Microhabitat distribution of D. nitedula individuals (ind./100 trap-nights).



Characteristics of forest biotopes

Table 1 provides data characterizing the state of the vegetation in habitats of D. nitedula. Oak forest as a whole consisted of Quercus sessiliflora and Quercus pubescens (up to 80 %) with an admixture of Pinus sosnovsky and Acer campestre. In the understory well developed shrubby vegetation was recorded: Crataegus pseudogeterophilla, Mespilus germanica, Cornus mas, Prunus spinosa, Paliurus spina-christi, Rosa canina, etc. The hornbeam-beech forest consisted of Carpinus betulus, Fagus orientalis, Quercus sessiliflora, Quercus pubescens, and Tilia caucasica. The shrubby vegetation was sparse, consisting of Crataegus pseudogeterophilla, Rosa canina, Rubus sanctum, and Corylus avellana (Table 1).

The sites differed significantly from each other. The densities of trees and shrubs were higher in oak forest than in hornbeam-beech forest, whereas linear sizes of trees and shrubs were higher in the latter (Table 1). Production of trees and grass vegetation was higher in oak forest.

Populations and habitat

Table 2 shows the dynamics of D. nitedula numbers in both forest biotopes. For a given study period, average numbers of these dormice in oak forest was 1.7 times higher than in hornbeam-beech forest (t = 5.7, p < 0.0002).

To assess microhabitat distribution of D. nitedula individuals the forest canopy was divided into five microhabitats: open sites, forest edge, high-standing forest, undergrowth, and shrubby vegetation. Table 3 shows that maximum numbers of D. nitedula were found in shrub associations and in parts of a forest dominated by young trees in both forest area types. Minimal numbers of the species were found in high forest microhabitats (Table 3).

Additionally we estimated vertical distribution of D. nitedula nests and found optimal height of nests in both forest biotopes was 2–3 m above the ground surface (Fig. 2).

Table 4.

D. nitedula reproduction characteristics. %♀ - reproductively active females.


Table 5.

Spearman rank correlations between D. nitedula state and forest habitats structure attributes in both habitats. Significant values are in bold (p < 0.05).


Reproduction rates and sex ratio

Sexual activity of D. nitedula males was measured by the size of testes. The first signs of sexual activity among males were recorded soon after the animals came out of hibernation in both forest biotopes. The maximum size of testes was seen in April in both forest biotopes: 0.834 ± 0.99 cm3 (n = 49) in oak forest and 0.872 ± 0.11 cm3 (n = 18) in hornbeambeech forest. Subsequently sexual activity of males began to decline and, by August, the size of testes was 0.195 ± 0.06 cm3 in oak forest and 0.185 ± 0.09 cm3 in hornbeam-beech forest. Thus, sexual behavior of D. nitedula males was not significantly different in the two biotopes (t = 0.02, p = 0.98). Sex ratios showed domination of males in both forest biotopes: 1.18:1 (n = 118) in oak forest and 1.11:1 (n = 55) in hornbeambeech forest (Table 4).

Age groups of D. nitedula did not differ significantly between biotopes (p > 0.05). The spring population of D. nitedula consisted only of adult individuals in both biotopes. By the end of summer (August juveniles formed 48 % and 43 % of the population in oak and hornbeam-beech forests respectively.


We found a wide spectrum of items in the diet of forest dormice including animal material, along with fruit and seeds of almost all species of trees and shrubs occurring at the study sites. The main types of food of D. nitedulа were animals and seeds; 29.6, 24.05 %, respectively, in oak forest and 30.88, 27.06 %, respectively, in hornbeam-beech forest.

Species composition of the diet was revealed by analyzing food remains. The diet of individuals of the species from oak forest consisted of 18 species of foods, and in individuals from hornbeam-beech forest of 19 species. The degree of similarity between diets of dormice from both forest biotopes was 86 %. In both biotopes the animals attained similar body weight during the active phase of the year: 35.63 ± 0.79 g (n = 73) in oak forest and 34.33 ± 1.14 g (n = 46) (p > 0.05) in hornbeam-beech forest. Thus, food cannot be a key factor limiting numbers and distribution of the species in the study areas.

We used numbers and body weight of adult individuals to indicate relative “success” in the two habitats. Table 5 shows values of Spearman Rank correlations comparing the state of the dormouse population and vegetation parameters. Body weight significantly correlates with production of seeds and protective cover provided by grassy vegetation in both biotopes. The second indicator of the species success (numbers) demonstrated significant dependence on six parameters of the vegetation in both biotopes. Numbers of D. nitedula positively correlate with an increase in the density of trees, shrubs, and closeness of crowns and negatively correlates with the height of trees, shrubs, and the diameter of trees in both biotopes. Thus, D. nitedula does well in areas with abundant vegetable foods, although the numbers of dormice are higher in oak forest.


According to several authors the key condition for the existence of D. nitedula is well developed shrubby vegetation (Likhachev 1972, Airapetyants 1983). Studies performed in Moldova and the Ukraine have shown that the density of D. nitedula in biotopes with a well developed shrubby vegetation was 20–25 individuals per hectare, in young oak groves up to 8/ ha and in high forests with sparse undergrowth 1–3 individuals per hectare (Airapetyants 1983, Kryštufek & Vohralík 1994, Nowakowski & Boratyński 1997, Pilāts et al. 2012). Similar results were found in our studies, with D. nitedula numbers higher in the biotope oak forest with greatest density of shrubby vegetation. We suppose that the structure of the oak forest is more suitable for D. nitedula offering more convenient movement, and nest locations than the structure of the hornbeam-beech forest. Despite the great vegetation productivity of the oak forest, D. nitedula individuals reached similar body weights in hornbeam-beech forest. One may conclude that when body weights and the intensity of reproduction are similar, but numbers of forest dormice significantly differ, the structure of woody-shrub vegetation becomes more important as a factor determining the state of D. nitedula populations in Daghestan.


The study was supported by PTES Foundation Nfi01_356.gif 274206 and Russian Fund Fundamental Researches Nfi01_356.gif13-04-00222.



Adler G.H. 2000: Tropical diversity forest structure and demography of a frugivorous rodent the spiny rat (Proechimys semispinosus). J. Zool. Lond. 250: 57–74. Google Scholar


Airapetyants A.E. 1983: Dormice. Leningrad Press , Leningrad . (in Russian) Google Scholar


Akaev B.A. 1996: The relief. Physiography of Daghestan. School Press , Moscow. (in Russian)  Google Scholar


Borovikov V.P. 2001: Program STATISTICA for students and engineers. Computer Press , 2nd ed., Moscow. (in Russian)  Google Scholar


Di Bitetti M.S. 2001: Home-range use by the tufted capuchin monkey (Cebus apella nigritus) in a subtropical rainforest of Argentina. J. Zool. Lond. 253: 33–45. Google Scholar


Kryštufek B. 1985: Forest dormouse Dryomys nitedula (Pallas, 1778) - Rodentia, Mammalia - in Yugoslavia. Scopolia 9: 1–35. Google Scholar


Kryštufek B. & Vohralík V. 1994: Distribution of the forest dormouse Dryomys nitedula (Pallas, 1778) (Rodentia, Myoxidae) in Europe. Mammal Rev. 24: 161–177. Google Scholar


Kucheruk V.V. 2006: Census of some important rodent and shrew species. In: Rojnov V.V., Khlap L.A. & Korenderg E.I.(eds.), Selected works. Union of scientific publications KMK , Moscow : 125–160. (in Russian) Google Scholar


Likhachev G.N. 1972: Distribution of dormice in the European USSR. Fauna and Ecology of Rodents 2: 71–115. (in Russian) Google Scholar


Lvov P.L. 1964: Forest of Daghestan. Daghestan State University Press , Makhachkala . (in Russian) Google Scholar


Magomedov M.-R.D. & Magomedov M.Sh. 2008: An assessment of feeding of the forest dormouse (Dryomys nitedula, Rodentia) and yellow niked mouse (Apodemus flavipectus, Murinae, Rodentia) related to their seasonal activity. Zool. Zh. 87: 748–753. (in Russian) Google Scholar


Magomedov M.Sh., Mamaeva S.K. & Saypueva E.B. 2012: Analysis of qualitative and qualitative diet of forest dormouse (Dryomys nitedula Pallas, 1779) in different forest types in the foothill zone of Daghestan. The South of Russia: Ecology, Development 2: 46–49. (in Russian) Google Scholar


Malcolm J.R. & Ray J.C. 2000: Influence of timber extraction routes on Central African small-mammal communities, forest structure, and tree diversity. Conserv. Biol. 14: 1623–1638. Google Scholar


Nowakowski W.K. & Boratyński P. 1997: Habitat preferences of the forest dormouse (Dryomys nitedula) in lowland forests. Pol. Ecol. Stud. 23: 199–207. Google Scholar


Pilāts V., Pilāte D., Ornicāns A. & Kārkliņš A. 2012: Microhabitat utilization by forest dormice (Dryomys nitedula) in boreo-nemoral forest - preliminary results. Peckiana 8: 77–85. Google Scholar


Rossolimo O.L., Potapova E.G., Pavlinov I.Y., Kruskop S.V. & Voltzit O.V. 2001: Dormice (Myoxidae) of the world. Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta , Moskva . (in Russian) Google Scholar


Vasquez R.A., Ebensperger L.A. & Bozinovic F. 2002: The influence of habitat on travel speed, intermittent locomotion, and vigilance in a diurnal rodent. Behav. Ecol. 13: 182–187. Google Scholar


Voronov A.G. 1973: Geobotany, 2nd ed. High School , Moscow . (in Russian) Google Scholar
Magomedrasul Magomedov "Assessment of the habitat quality of the forest dormouse (Dryomys nitedula) in Daghestan, Russia: role of foods and vegetation structure," Folia Zoologica 64(4), 356-360, (1 December 2015).
Received: 14 December 2014; Accepted: 1 July 2015; Published: 1 December 2015

Back to Top