Translator Disclaimer
1 July 2021 Variability of colour pattern and genetic diversity of Salamandra salamandra (Caudata: Salamandridae) in the Czech Republic
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Two evolutionary lineages of the fire salamander occur in central Europe: the typically striped subspecies Salamandra salamandra terrestris (Bonnaterre, 1789) and the typically spotted Salamandra salamandra salamandra (Linnaeus, 1758). In the Czech Republic, fire salamanders have traditionally been viewed as belonging to the S. s. salamandra evolutionary lineage. Nevertheless, the colour pattern of some individuals in the westernmost part of the Czech Republic resembles that of S. s. terrestris in having parallel continuous bands along the back. In this study, we investigated whether in the Czech Republic the presence of striped fire salamander phenotype could be associated with the genotype of S. s. terrestris. We sequenced the mitochondrial D-loop and two nuclear markers, Rag2 and PDGFRα, of 61 fire salamander individuals from the Czech Republic. To describe the geographical distribution pattern of the striped and spotted fire salamander phenotype in the Czech Republic, we evaluated colour phenotypes of 398 individuals from ten localities distributed so as to cover the whole country. We found no evidence of presence of genotypes corresponding to the S. s. terrestris lineage. We did, however, find that the striped phenotype is found mostly in the northwest of the Czech Republic, where both the striped and the intermediate phenotype occur significantly more frequently than in the rest of the country, where the spotted phenotype seems dominant. This finding indicates that Czech and Polish populations of S. salamandra show a degree of phenotypic pattern variation comparable to that observed in German populations, although at a local level the frequencies of the striped and spotted phenotype vary. It would be interesting to test whether a genetic toolkit responsible for the colour pattern is shared via genetic introgression between populations, or whether the striped phenotype of Czech fire salamanders evolved independently.

Introduction

Coloration can aid animal survival and reproduction in various ways, including protection against solar radiation, crypsis, communication, and recognition of conspecifics (Cuthill et al. 2017). One evolutionarily important function of body coloration is its role in speciation (Andersson & Simmons 2006). For instance, once females develop preference for a particular colour patterns in males, coloration can – much like geographical isolation – function as a prezygotic reproductive barrier (Kirkpatrick & Ravigné 2002). On the other hand, the genetic toolkits responsible for colour and colour patterns can be shared via hybridisation bewtween distinct evolutionary lineages (Dasmahapatra et al. 2012, Taylor & Larson 2019) and can also lead to speciation (Mallet 2007). Identification of colour phenotypes in closely related evolutionary lineages is therefore important in understanding the functional role of coloration in a species.

Although fire salamander (Salamandra salamandra Linnaeus, 1758) coloration is limited to brown, black, red, and yellow, different lineages of fire salamanders display a range of distinct colour patterns (Seidel & Gerhardt 2016). Fire salamanders develop their colour pattern, i.e. the form and arrangement of spots and stripes, after metamorphosis (Pederzoli et al. 2003). During the course of their life the colour pattern of fire salamanders from the Balkan peninsula undergoes only subtle changes (Wisniewski & Wisniewski 1998), but some pattern changes have been reported in Slovak populations (Balogová et al. 2016) and the Corsican fire salamander (Salamandra corsica Savi, 1838) exhibits pronounced colour pattern changes (Beukema 2011). The colour pattern of fire salamanders in the Czech Republic has been used by researchers to distinguish individuals (Opatrný 1983, Peprný 2000).

Fig. 1.

Colour pattern phenotypes of fire salamanders (Salamandra salamandra) from the studied area. A) the striped phenotype from north-western Bohemia, Czech Republic. B) the spotted phenotype from central Bohemia, Czech Republic (photos Jiří Moravec).

img-z2-7_01.jpg

In central Europe, we find two evolutionary lineages of S. salamandra, which have traditionally been considered distinct subspecies (Veith 1992, Steinfartz et al. 2000, Dufresnes 2019). The banded fire salamander (Salamandra salamandra terrestris Bonnaterre, 1789), type locality Normandy (Eiselt 1958), is found from the Pyrenees to Germany. The spotted fire salamander (S. s. salamandra Linnaeus, 1758), type locality Nürnberg (Mertens & Müller 1928), is distributed throughout eastern Germany, central and eastern Europe, and the Balkans (Thiesmeier & Grossenbacher 2004, Seidel & Gerhardt 2016). As the vernacular names suggest, representatives of the two lineages differ in their dorsal colour pattern. Salamandra s. terrestris have two parallel stripes along their back, while spotted fire salamanders are characterised by an irregular distribution of isolated spots on their back (Boulenger 1911). Boulenger (1911) claimed that there are no transitions or intermediate phenotypes in-between the striped S. s. terrestris of western Europe and the spotted S. s. salamandra of eastern Europe. Later authors, however, demonstrated that intermediate phenotypes do exist and in fact occur widely in central Europe (Eiselt 1958, Steinfartz et al. 2000, Weitere et al. 2004). According to Arnold (2002), the two lineages share a contact zone, which – based on colour pattern phenotypes – appears to stretch from eastern Germany to the Czech Republic and Poland. To date, only a few studies have attempted to quantify the distribution of fire salamanders' colour phenotypes (Klewen 1985, Beukema et al. 2016, Najbar et al. 2018, Burgon et al. 2020) and even fewer have related it to the distribution of genetic lineages (Veith 1992, Beukema et al. 2016, Najbar et al. 2018, Burgon et al. 2020).

The localisation of a contact zone between the western and eastern evolutionary lineages of fire salamanders, traditionally referred to as S. s. terrestris and S. s. salamandra, in central Europe remains an open question (Veith 1992, Arnold 2002, Najbar et al. 2018). This is despite the fact Weitere et al. (2004) described two contact zones based on mitochondrial D-loop sequences: one in south-western Germany, the other in northwestern Germany. The most recent genome-wide study confirmed the presence of two contact zones in Germany, one in the extreme south, the other in the north of the country, including the Elbe Valley (Burgon 2018, Supplementary Figure A4.6). The northern contact zone is not limited to north-western Germany, it extends across the north towards the northeast but the study did not include any sampling points further to the east so the full extent of the distribution remains unclear (Burgon 2018).

In the Czech Republic, fire salamanders have historically been believed to belong to the evolutionary lineage S. s. salamandra. On the other hand,thepresenceofS.s.terrestrishasbeenreported in Germany, near the north-western border of Bohemia, especially in the vicinity of Meißen, Dresden, and Zittau (Baruš & Oliva 1992, Zöphel & Steffens 2002), and striped phenotypes were found over a hundred years ago around Liberec, which is again in the north-western part of Bohemia (Pražák 1898). Phenotypical characteristics of some individuals in the westernmost part of the Czech Republic resemble those of S. s. terrestris in that they have parallel, more or less continuous stripes along the back (Baruš & Oliva 1992, Benda 2015, Moravec 2019). In the rest of the country, the spotted phenotype seems dominant (Fig. 1).

Hitherto, we do not have the data on either the exact distribution of colour phenotypes or the genetic variation of S. salamandra in the Czech Republic. In this study, we report our findings on the distribution of dorsal colour pattern phenotypes and genetic diversity of fire salamanders in the Czech Republic. Specifically, we ask whether the presence of the striped phenotype could be associated with the genotype of S. s. terrestris in the Czech Republic.

Material and Methods

Analysis of distribution of colour pattern phenotypes

To describe the geographical distribution of the striped and spotted phenotypes of fire salamanders in the Czech Republic (current distribution of S. salamandra in the Czech Republic, Jeřábková & Zavadil 2020), we collected photographs of 398 individuals (National Museum Praha (NMPP6V), voucher specimens and living individuals recorded in the field) from ten localities which cover the whole range of the country (Jablečno, Vaňov-Ústí nad Labem, Děčín, Roztoky, Praha-Troja, Kuroslepy, Velká nad Veličkou, Libavá; coordinates in Table 1, Fig. 2). Previous studies on fires salamanders in the Czech Republic showed that colour pattern can be used to discriminate individuals (Opatrný 1983, Peprný 2000), hence no individual marking was needed to avoid recaptures.

Eiselt (1958) divided the colour pattern phenotypes of S. salamandra into four categories: striped, striped-spotted, spotted-striped, and spotted. Klewen (1985) and Najbar et al. (2018) expanded this division by adding further categories. Because we were mostly interested in differences between the striped and the spotted phenotypes, we simplified the division and, based on photographs, sorted individual phenotypes into three colour pattern categories following Benda (2015) or Veith (1992). The categories were defined as follows: a) striped: a yellow dorsal pattern consisting of two continuous or mostly continuous dorsolateral bands (Fig. 1A), b) intermediate: a symmetric dorsal pattern consisting mostly of separate spots, some of which may be asymmetric, c) spotted: no obvious continuous symmetric bands can be discerned, the yellow dorsal pattern consists of irregular, randomly distributed spots (Fig. 1B), which can be accompanied by a single continuous asymmetric stripe along the body.

We calculated the ratio of each colour pattern category for each population and interpolated the values for the geographical space of the Czech Republic using the RCzechia package (Lacko 2020) and interpolation function idw in the gstat package (Pebesma 2004) in R software (R Core Team 2017). Then we compared the counts of colour pattern categories between all populations with Pearson's chi-squared test using chisq.test followed by a post hoc analysis based on the residuals of Pearson's chi-squared test for count data in the chisq.posthoc. test package (Ebbert 2019) in R.

Genetic analyses

Sampling (Fig. 3A, Table S1) was designed to cover the west-east latitudinal gradient of the fire salamander range in the Czech Republic, with focus on the north-western part of the country where individuals of the striped phenotype were previously reported. We collected 77 individuals of S. salamandra, 61 of whom were collected specifically for this study in the Czech Republic and four in Slovakia. Collection took place in 2017-2018. Samples were obtained from roadkill. Samples from the core area of distribution of S. s. terrestris (two individuals from Germany) were kindly provided by Professor Wolfgang Böhme from collections of the Zoologische Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig in Bonn (ZFMK). Samples from the core areas of distribution of S. s. salamandra (five samples from Greece-NHMC, three from Albania, one from Ukraine, and one from Slovenia) were obtained from roadkill collected during another study.

Small tissue samples were preserved in 96% molecular grade ethanol. DNA was extracted using the Tissue Genomic DNA Mini Kit (GT300, Geneaid) according to the manufacturer's instructions. To barcode the salamanders, we used three DNA markers: the mitochondrial D-loop and two nuclear markers, Rag2 and PDGFRα, because it has been reported that these are sufficiently variable to enable a comparison between closely related evolutionary lineages (Vences et al. 2014). We used L-PRO-ML and H-12S1-ML to amplify the D-loop, PDGFRa2F and PDGFRa2R-F primers to amplify the PDGFRα, and RAG2-SAL-F2 and RAG2-SAL-R1 to amplify Rag 2 (Vences et al. 2014). PCR was performed in a final volume of 25 µl. PCR conditions were as follows: 120 s at 94 °C for initial incubation; 39 cycles of 20 s at 94 °C, 50 s at 60 °C, 180 s at 72 °C, and a final extension for 10 min at 72 °C. This was followed by PCR product purification (Šanda et al. 2008). Sequencing was carried out by Macrogen Service Centre Europe (Amsterdam, Netherlands) using amplification primers.

From the GenBank database (Sayers et al. 2019), we downloaded the sequences of Salamandra salamandra gallaica (D-loop – KX094979.1, PDGFRα – KF645649, Rag2 – KF645724.1) and Salamandra salamandra longirostris (D-loop – KF645599.1, PDGFRα – KF645651.1, Rag2 – KF645726.1) to use as outgroups when assessing the differentiation between S. s. terrestris and S. s. salamandra. All sequences were checked for quality manually and homologous regions were aligned using the ClustalW algorithm implemented in Geneious 9.0.5. (Kearse et al. 2012). Haplotypes of the mitochondrial D-loop were determined using DNAsp 5.10 (Librado & Rozas 2009) and the haplotype network was calculated in TCS 1.21 (Clement et al. 2002) using 95% connection limit and gap as the fifth character. The network was visualised using tcsBU (Múrias dos Santos et al. 2016). Sequences were concatenated and the neighbour joining tree calculated in Geneious 9.0.5 using the Juke-Cantor genetic distance model and bootstrap resampling (random seed = 467,663, with 10,000 replicates). The partition scheme was determined by Partitionfinder 2.1.1 (Lanfear et al. 2017). A Bayesian inference tree was calculated using MrBayes 3.2.6 (Ronquist et al. 2011). The analysis consisted of two simultaneous runs, four MCMC chains, and ten million generations. The trees were sampled every 100 generations, whereby the first 25% of trees were discarded. Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) were estimated from the post burn-in samples, and the 50% majority-rule consensus tree was generated from the retained posterior distribution trees.

Fig. 2.

The distribution of proportions of colour pattern phenotypes of fire salamanders in the Czech Republic as extrapolated in geographical space. A) striped phenotype, B) intermediate phenotype, C) spotted phenotype. Note that the scale for different phenotypes differs.

img-z4-9_01.jpg

Table 1.

Differences between populations and the rest of the Czech Republic after post hoc analysis based on residuals of Pearson's chi-squared test for counts of individuals belonging to one of the three colour pattern phenotypes.

img-z5-3_01.gif

Results

Analysis of distribution of colour pattern phenotypes

Table S2 presents a categorisation of individuals based on photographs. A distribution of ratios of colour pattern as well as interpolation of values onto the geographical space of the Czech Republic are shown in Fig. 2. Localities in the north-western part of the country (Děčín and Ústí nad Labem-Vaňov) clearly show an increase in the presence of striped and intermediate individuals and a decrease in the occurrence of spotted individuals compared to the rest of the country. The presence of the intermediate phenotype was also increased at locality Kuroslepy and slightly elevated in Velká nad Veličkou and Praha-Troja. The highest occurrence of the spotted phenotype was observed in Jablečno, Praha-Troja, and Roztoky in the central part of Bohemia, whereby two of these localities, namely Jablečno and Roztoky, also had the lowest recorded presence of the striped and the intermediate phenotype.

Fig. 3.

Sampling design and the results of genetic analyses. A) Sampling design, where circles represent individuals and colour coding represents haplotype membership: blue – Salamandra salamandra terrestris from Germany, red – Salamandra salamandra salamandra from the Balkan peninsula and Ukraine, reddish purple – fire salamanders from the Czech Republic and Slovakia that bear “haplotype 1”, the most common found in this study, orange – two individuals from Děčín (SS14, SS18) that bear “haplotype 2”, black – individual SS59 from Oderské vrchy that bear “haplotype 3”, yellow – individual SS61 that bears “haplotype 4”. B) A statistical parsimony haplotype network (connection limit 95%) for 699 bp partial D-loop sequence of studied salamanders calculated using the TCS algorithm. In this network, branches represent mutations, small blank circles represent missing hypothetical haplotypes. C) Neighbour joining tree based on a concatenated sequence of mitochondrial D-loop and nuclear Rag2 and PDGFRα sequences (1,335 bp), where node numbers show consensus percentage support, while branches are of equal length. Individual samples are colour coded according to haplotype membership. D) Bayesian inference tree based on a concatenated sequence of mitochondrial D-loop and nuclear Rag2 and PDGFRα sequences (1,335 bp). Node numbers show probability, the scale bar represents the number of nucleotide substitutions per site, individual samples are colour coded by haplotype membership.

img-z6-2_01.jpg

The counts of individuals belonging to individual colour pattern categories differed significantly between populations χ2 (df = 14, n = 398) = 133.41, P < 0.001. Results of a post hoc analysis based on the residuals of Pearson's chi-squared test for count data are summarised in Table 1. Our results confirm that localities in the north-western part of the Czech Republic (Děčín and Ústí nad Labem-Vaňov) differ significantly in the counts of both striped and spotted colour pattern phenotypes from the rest of the country (all P < 0.001). At these localities there is a high proportion of striped individuals. On the other hand, the Praha-Troja locality differs significantly from the rest of the country (P < 0.001) as there are no striped individuals. The Roztoky locality differs significantly in the count of spotted individuals (P < 0.001). We can thus conclude that localities in the north-western part of the Czech Republic harbour a higher proportion of the striped phenotype of S. salamandra than the rest of the country.

Genetic analyses

The sequencing and postprocessing of sequences resulted in a concatenated alignment of total length 1,335 bp (D-loop – 699 bp, GenBank accession numbers MZ436191-MZ436263; PDGFRα – 404 bp, GenBank accession numbers MZ436264-MZ436336; Rag2 – 232 bp, GenBank accession numbers MZ436337-MZ436397). We identified 11 single-nucleotide mutations in the D-loop region only one of which was parsimony-informative; the rest were singletons. Once we took the gaps into account, both the DNAsp and TCS identified eight mitochondrial haplotypes. One haplotype, represented by S. s. longirostris (S. longirostris sensu Frost 2020), turned out to be unconnected to the haplotype network because the probability of its connection to the network did not reach the 95% connection limit. One haplotype, represented by S. s. terrestris, was clearly separate from a group formed by the haplotype consisting of S. s. salamandra samples from eastern and south-eastern Europe. Then we also found a haplotype represented by S. s. gallaica and four haplotypes represented by individuals from the Czech Republic and Slovakia. One of these four haplotypes contained individuals from the northwestern region of the Czech Republic (haplotype 2, locality Ludvíkovice), two haplotypes were represented by one individual each (both of which came from northern Moravia, namely haplotype 3, Libavá and haplotype 4, Týn nad Bečvou). All remaining individuals from the Czech Republic and Slovakia turned out to belong to the remaining fourth haplotype (haplotype 1, haplotype network in Fig. 3B).

We found only one single-nucleotide mutation in the partial PDGFRα sequence and two single-nucleotide mutations in the partial Rag2 sequence, but only one of those was parsimony-informative. The single-nucleotide mutation in the partial PDGFRα sequence was shared by the two individuals from the localities in Germany. The parsimony informative single-nucleotide mutation in Rag2 was shared by seven individuals sequenced in this study (the two individuals from Germany, four individuals from north-west of the Czech Republic, one individual from the central part of the country and one individual from the Czech-Moravian highlands) and sequence of S. s. longirostris downloaded from GeneBank. Both neighbour joining (Fig. 3C) and Bayesian inference-based (Fig. 3D) trees based on these concatenated data revealed a clear separation between individuals of S. s. terrestris and the rest of the samples studied. We therefore conclude that individuals from the Czech Republic included in our study do not belong to the S. s. terrestris lineage.

Discussion

We found that the striped phenotype of S. salamandra is most abundant in the north-western part of the Czech Republic (Fig. 2), where frequencies of the striped and intermediate phenotype differ significantly from the rest of the country (Table 1). Our finding supports and elaborates on previous reports according to which both fire salamander phenotypes are sympatric at least in a small part of the Czech Republic (Benda 2015, Moravec 2019; Fig. 1). Our results thus provoke questions regarding the historical evolutionary mechanisms which lead to the coexistence of the striped and spotted salamander phenotypes in the Czech Republic.

Different authors mention the varying distribution of the three phenotypes (striped, intermediate, and spotted) throughout Germany. The distribution of colour pattern phenotypes of S. salamandra in central Europe has been studied quantitatively in Germany by Klewen (1985) and in Poland by Najbar et al. (2018). In Leiberg (Germany, approximately 270 km west of the Czech Republic), most fire salamanders belong to the striped phenotype (80%), with spotted individuals making up only a small proportion of the population (< 1%) (Klewen 1985). This shows that the striped phenotype is characteristic of an area west of the Czech Republic. It has recently been reported that in eastern Upper Lusatia, the westernmost part of Poland – which is likewise adjacent to the German border (the locality is approximately 20 km from German Zittau) – there is a higher frequency of both the striped (15%) and the intermediate phenotype (57.9%) than in other Polish fire salamander populations (Najbar et al. 2018). Our data show that both the striped and the intermediate phenotype occur with the highest frequency at localities in the furthest northwest of Bohemia, Děčín (striped 53%, intermediate 40%) and Ústí nad Labem-Vaňov (striped 52%, intermediate 44%). These localities are in areas adjacent to the German border (e.g. Děčín is approximately 50 km from Zittau) in the Elbe Valley (Fig. 2A, B). Benda (2015) showed that the striped phenotype occurs with a higher frequency (48%) than either the intermediate (22%) or the spotted form (30%) in Saxon-Bohemian Switzerland, Děčín highlands, which is similarly in the north-western part of the country, close to the German border. These results indicate that both the Czech and Polish populations of S. salamandra show a degree of phenotypic pattern variation comparable to that observed in the German populations, although the frequencies of the striped and spotted phenotype differ locally.

Within the Czech Republic, localities in northwestern Bohemia are characterised by a high frequency of both the striped and the intermediate phenotype. In central Bohemia, we can observe a sort of hiatus, where the striped phenotype is virtually missing (< 5%) and the spotted phenotype reaches its maximum frequency (> 70%). In the eastern part of the country (Libavá), both the striped and the intermediate phenotypes are again found at slightly increased frequencies (20% and 27% respectively; compare Fig. 2A, C). This geographical trend is similar to that observed in the Polish populations, where after low occurrence in the western populations between Lusatia and Opawskie Mountains, the striped phenotype increases in frequency in the Opawskie Mountains (8%) (Najbar et al. 2018). The distance between the Czech Libavá and Polish Opawskie Mountains is less than 80 km, which means it is possible that the Salamandra populations of these regions are related. Our results did not, however, show a statistically significant difference between Libavá and other populations in the Czech Republic. It is thus also possible that the difference in frequency of the colour pattern phenotypes merely reflects naturally occurring random variation. Variability of colour pattern phenotypes in populations of the usually spotted S. s. salamandra remains virtually unknown. Future studies should attempt to quantify the abundance of colour pattern phenotypes in fire salamanders throughout their range to test the adaptive significance of colour patterns.

We found no evidence of the presence of genotypes corresponding to the S. s. terrestris lineage on Czech territory (Fig. 3) (for comparison between haplotypes presented in this study and haplotypes published on GenBank; Fig. S1), although S. s. terrestris and S. s. salamandra do share a contact zone in central Europe (Veith 1992, Steinfartz et al. 2000, Thiesmeier & Grossenbacher 2004, Weitere et al. 2004, Burgon 2018). Given that the contact zone between S. s. terrestris and S. s. salamandra is located at some distance from the Czech Republic any expectation of the presence of S. s. terrestris in the country might be unfounded. Nevertheless, estimates regarding the position of the contact zone have changed significantly over time (e.g. Freytag 1955, Gauckler 1980, Klewen 1991, reviewed in Veith 1992). Some relatively recent studies localise the contact zone only to eastern Germany or even to eastern France, Switzerland, or southern Austria (Veith 1992, Thiesmeier & Grossenbacher 2004). Weitere et al. (2004) concluded that there are two contact zones between S. s. terrestris and S. s. salamandra: one in south-western Germany, restricted to the vicinity of Karlsruhe, the other in north-western Germany, spanning several hundred kilometres from Ahaus to the Deister, near Hannover. The most recent genome-wide study suggests the presence of a lineage that shares its evolutionary history with individuals from France (i.e. individuals that would have traditionally been considered S. s. terrestris) in the very south of Germany and another lineage in the north, including the Elbe Valley (Burgon 2018, Supplementary Figure A4.6). Based on this high-throughput data, the putative contact zone thus would not have been limited to the northwestern parts of Germany: it would extend across to the northeast. It remains unclear whether the distribution of the S. s. terrestris lineage reaches the very east of Germany, which may be possible given the presence of this lineage in the Elbe Valley in the north. However, at this point it must be noted that not only the distribution of central European lineages but also their subspecific status is a matter of discussion (Burgon 2018, Burgon et al. 2021).

An interesting question to be answered in the future is whether the colour pattern phenotypes are the result of shared or independent evolution of the German and Czech fire salamanders. The genetic toolkits responsible for the colour pattern of S. s. terrestris may be shared by genetic introgression from S. s. terrestris to Czech salamanders with the striped phenotype, which is a process known in other organisms (e.g. Zhang et al. 2016, Dannemann & Kelso 2017, Andrade et al. 2019). This scenario could be the case although the loci analysed in this study are not shared between the Czech fire salamanders and the S. s. terrestris lineage and the geographical distance between the non-admixed populations is rather long. On the other hand, the localities characteristic by an increased ratio of striped individuals are also characterised by presence of private haplotypes (Děčín – “haplotype 2”, Fig. 3A, B; and Libavá and Týn nad Bečvou – haplotypes 3 and 4, Fig. 3A, B). This finding might suggest that these salamander populations have a more pronounced structure than those in the rest of the Czech Republic. It is possible that at these localities the striped phenotype evolved independently of the striped phenotype of S. s. terrestris. This is because 1) according to our results (Fig. 3C, D) the Czech salamanders and S. s. terrestris do not share any recent evolutionary history and 2) increased genetic structuring at these localities may have arisen via selection on colour pattern, as is the case in the Iberian fire salamanders (Burgon et al. 2020). The polymorphic Iberian fire salamander populations do not, however, exhibit a neutral genetic structure. This observation may imply the possibility that the Czech polymorphic populations are more ancient. However, we do not know whether any haplotype is specific for any colour pattern phenotype, because we did not examine the colour patterns of individuals that were used for genetic sampling. More detailed sampling, including reference individuals from Germany and Poland, would be needed to place our findings in a broader context of genetic variability of fire salamanders in central Europe. Moreover, different molecular techniques – such as nuclear microsatellite data or genome-wide next-generation sequencing – should be employed to improve the description of genetic variability of fire salamanders in central Europe.

Conclusions

Our data indicate that the striped phenotype of S. salamandra occurs more frequently in the north-western regions of the Czech Republic, which are closer to the contact zone with S. s. terrestris. Nevertheless, we found no evidence for the presence of genotypes corresponding to S. s. terrestris in Czech Salamandra populations. More research on the distribution of fire salamander colour patterns may reveal interesting facts about the distribution of their distinct evolutionary lineages and their evolutionary history, and perhaps also demonstrate some more general rules of evolutionary genetics.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the editor and two reviewers for their comments and suggestions. We would like to thank Martin Cyprich, Václav Gvoždík, Jan Hošek, Kristýna Hošková, Petros Lymberakis, Vít Ladányi, and Edvárd Mizsei for their assistance during collection of tissue samples and Wolfgang Böhme and Morris Flecks for samples of S. s. terrestris. This study was supported by the National Museum as project P17/01IG-BR “Genetická struktura populací mloka skvrnitého (Salamandra salamandra) na území České republiky” (Genetic structure of spotted salamander (Salamandra salamandra) populations in the territory of the Czech Republic). J. Brejcha is employed within the framework of Charles University Research Centre program No. 204056. The work of J. Moravec was financially supported by the Ministry of Culture of the Czech Republic (DKRVO 2019–2023/6.V.b, National Museum Praha, 00023272). D. Jablonski received support from the Slovak Research and Development Agency. The manuscript was proofread by Anna Pilátová. J. Brejcha dedicates this study to his son Jindra. Author contributions: J. Brejcha, J. Moravec, and P. Benda conceived the study; J. Brejcha and J. Moravec designed the study; J. Brejcha, P. Benda, D. Jablonski, and J. Moravec collected the samples; J. Brejcha, K. Kodejš, T. Holer, J. Chmelař, and J. Moravec collected the photographs; J. Brejcha and K. Kodejš analysed the photographs; J. Brejcha and D. Jablonski conducted the laboratory work; J. Brejcha analysed the genetic data; J. Brejcha and J. Moravec drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to editing the manuscript.

Literature

1.

Andersson M. & Simmons L.W. 2006: Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21: 296–302. Google Scholar

2.

Andrade P., Pinho C., Pérez i de Lanuza G. et al. 2019: Regulatory changes in pterin and carotenoid genes underlie balanced color polymorphisms in the wall lizard. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 116: 56633–5642. Google Scholar

3.

Arnold E.N. 2002: Reptiles and amphibians of Europe. Princeton University Press , New Jersey . Google Scholar

4.

Balogová M., Kyselová M. & Uhrin M. 2016: Changes in dorsal spot pattern in adult Salamandra salamandra (Linnaeus, 1758). Herpetozoa 28: 167–171. Google Scholar

5.

Baruš V. & Oliva O. 1992: Fauna of CSFR. Amphibians. Academia , Praha . Google Scholar

6.

Benda P. 2015: Towards the understanding subspecies of fire salamander in the Bohemian and Sachsen Switzerland. Živa 6: 309–310. Google Scholar

7.

Beukema W. 2011: Ontogenetic pattern change in amphibians: the case of Salamandra corsica. Acta Herpetol . 6: 169–174. Google Scholar

8.

Beukema W., Nicieza A.G., Lourenço A. & Velo-Antón G. 2016: Colour polymorphism in Salamandra salamandra (Amphibia: Urodela), revealed by a lack of genetic and environmental differentiation between distinct phenotypes. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 54: 127–136. Google Scholar

9.

Boulenger E.G. 1911: A contribution to the study of the variations of the spotted salamander (Salamandra maculosa). Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 81: 323–347. Google Scholar

10.

Burgon J.D. 2018: Evolutionary and genomic associations of colour and pattern in fire and Alpine salamanders (Salamandra spp.). PhD thesis, University of Glasgow , Glasgow . Google Scholar

11.

Burgon J.D., Vences M., Steinfartz S. et al. 2021: Phylogenomic inference of species and subspecies diversity in the Palearctic salamander genus Salamandra. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 157: 107063. Google Scholar

12.

Burgon J.D., Vieites D.R., Jacobs A. et al. 2020: Functional colour genes and signals of selection in colour polymorphic salamanders. Mol. Ecol. 27: 1284–1299. Google Scholar

13.

Clement M., Snell Q., Walke P. et al. 2002: TCS: estimating gene genealogies. Proceedings 16th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, Ft. Lauderdale . Google Scholar

14.

Cuthill I.C., Allen W.L., Arbuckle K. et al. 2017: The biology of color. Science 357: 470. Google Scholar

15.

Dannemann M. & Kelso J. 2017: The contribution of Neanderthals to phenotypic variation in modern humans. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 101: 578–589. Google Scholar

16.

Dasmahapatra K.K., Walters J.R., Briscoe A.D. et al. 2012: Butterfly genome reveals promiscuous exchange of mimicry adaptations among species. Nature 487: 94. Google Scholar

17.

Dufresnes C. 2019: Amphibians of Europe, North Africa & the Middle East: a photographic guide. Bloomsbury Publishing , London . Google Scholar

18.

Ebbert 2019: chisq.posthoc.test: a post hoc analysis for Pearson's chi-squared test for count data.  https://github.com/ebbertd/chisq.posthoc.test Google Scholar

19.

Eiselt J. 1958: Der Feuersalamander, Salamandra salamandra (L.). Beiträge zu einer taxonomischen Synthese. Abhandlungen und Berichte für Naturkunde und Vorgeschichte 10: 77–154. Google Scholar

20.

Freytag G.E. 1955: Feuersalamander und Alpensalamander. Die Neue Brehm-Bücherei 142 , Wittenberg-Lutherstadt , Ziemsen . Google Scholar

21.

Frost D.R. 2020: Amphibian species of the world: an online reference. Version 6.1 (downloaded on 10 January 2021). American Museum of Natural History , New York .  https://doi.org/10.5531/db.vz.0001 Google Scholar

22.

Gauckler K. 1980: Die Verbreitung der Rassen des Feuersalamanders in den Landschaften Nordbayerns. Nat. Mensch 80: 43–47. Google Scholar

23.

Jeřábková L. & Zavadil V. 2020: Atlas of distribution of amphibians of the Czech Republic. Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic , Praha . Google Scholar

24.

Kearse M., Moir R., Wilson A. et al. 2012: Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28: 1647–1649. Google Scholar

25.

Kirkpatrick M. & Ravigné V. 2002: Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. Am. Nat. 159: S22–S35. Google Scholar

26.

Klewen R. 1985: Untersuchungen zur Ökologie und Populationsbiologie des Feuersalamanders (Salamandra salamandra terrestris Lacépède 1788) an einer isolierten Population im Kreise Paderborn. Abhandlungen aus dem Westfälisches Museum für Naturkunde , Münster . Google Scholar

27.

Klewen R. 1991: Die Landsalamander Europas, Teil 1. Wittenberg Lutherstadt, Ziemsen-Verlag . Google Scholar

28.

Konowalik A., Najbar A., Babik W. et al. 2016: Genetic structure of the fire salamander Salamandra salamandra in the Polish Sudetes. Amphib.-Reptil. 37: 405–415. Google Scholar

29.

Lacko J. 2020: RCzechia: spatial objects of the Czech Republic.  https://github.com/jlacko/RCzechia Google Scholar

30.

Lanfear R., Frandsen P.B., Wright A.M. et al. 2017: PartitionFinder 2: new methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34: 772–773. Google Scholar

31.

Librado P. & Rozas J. 2009: DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25: 1451–1452. Google Scholar

32.

Mallet J. 2007: Hybrid speciation. Nature 446: 279–283. Google Scholar

33.

Mertens R. & Müller L. 1928: Liste der Amphibien und Reptilien Europas. Abh. Senckenb. Naturforsch. Ges. 41: 1–62. Google Scholar

34.

Moravec J. 2019: Amphibians and reptiles of the Czech Republic. Academia , Praha . Google Scholar

35.

Múrias dos Santos A., Cabezas M.P., Tavares A.I. et al. 2016: tcsBU: a tool to extend TCS network layout and visualization. Bioinformatics 32: 627–628. Google Scholar

36.

Najbar A., Konowalik A., Najbar B. & Ogielska M. 2018: Yellow patterns polymorphism of the fire salamander Salamandra salamandra in Poland. Acta Herpetol . 13: 101–108. Google Scholar

37.

Opatrný E. 1983: Individuelle Identifikation vom Feuersalamander, Salamandra salamandra (Linnaeus, 1758), nach den Hautpigmentzeichnungen. Biologica 78: 107–111. Google Scholar

38.

Pebesma E.J. 2004: Multivariable geostatistics in S: the gstat package. Comput. Geosci. 30: 683–691. Google Scholar

39.

Pederzoli A., Gambarelli A. & Restani C. 2003: Xanthophore migration from the dermis to the epidermis and dermal remodeling during Salamandra salamandra salamandra (L.) larval development. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res . 16: 50–58. Google Scholar

40.

Peprný M. 2000: Spatial and seasonal activity of fire salamander, Salamandra salamandra. MSc thesis, Charles University , Praha . Google Scholar

41.

Pražák J.P. 1898: Systematische Uebersicht der Reptilien und Batrachier Böhmens. Zool. Jahrb. Abt. Syst. Geog. Biol. Thiere 11: 173–234. Google Scholar

42.

R Core Team 2017: R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing , Vienna, Austria . Google Scholar

43.

Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J.P. & Teslenko M. 2011: MrBayes version 3.2 manual: tutorials and model summaries.  https://github.com/NBISweden/MrBayes/blob/develop/doc/manual/Manual_MrBayes_v3.2.pdf Google Scholar

44.

Rozas J., Librado P., Sánchez-DelBario J.C. et al. 2010: DNA sequence polymorphism version 5.10.01.  http://www.ub.es/dnasp Google Scholar

45.

Sayers E.W., Cavanaugh M., Clark K. et al. 2019: GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res . 47: D94–D99. Google Scholar

46.

Seidel U. & Gerhardt P. 2016: The genus Salamandra: history, biology, systematics, captive breeding. Chimaira , Frankfurt am Main . Google Scholar

47.

Steinfartz S., Veith M. & Tautz D. 2000: Mitochondrial sequence analysis of Salamandra taxa suggests old splits of major lineages and postglacial recolonizations of Central Europe from distinct source populations of Salamandra salamandra. Mol. Ecol. 9: 397–410. Google Scholar

48.

Šanda R., Vukić J., Choleva L. et al. 2008: Distribution of loach fishes (Cobitidae, Nemacheilidae) in Albania, with genetic analysis of populations of Cobitis ohridana. Folia Zool . 57: 42–50. Google Scholar

49.

Taylor S.A. & Larson E.L. 2019: Insights from genomes into the evolutionary importance and prevalence of hybridization in nature. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3: 170–177. Google Scholar

50.

Thiesmeier B. & Grossenbacher K. 2004: Handbuch der Reptilien und Amphibien Europas, Band 4/I: Schwanzlurche (Urodela) I. Aula-Verlag , WiebelsheimGoogle Scholar

51.

Veith M. 1992: The fire salamander, Salamandra salamandra L., in central Europe: subspecies distribution and intergradation. Amphib.-Reptil. 13: 297–313. Google Scholar

52.

Vences M., Sanchez E., Hauswaldt J.S. et al. 2014: Nuclear and mitochondrial multilocus phylogeny and survey of alkaloid content in true salamanders of the genus Salamandra (Salamandridae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 73: 208–216. Google Scholar

53.

Vörös J., Ursenbacher S., Kiss I. et al. 2017: Increased genetic structuring of isolated Salamandra salamandra populations (Caudata: Salamandridae) at the margins of the Carpathian Mountains. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 55: 138–149. Google Scholar

54.

Weitere M., Tautz D., Neuman D. & Steinfartz S. 2004: Adaptive divergence vs. environmental plasticity: tracing local genetic adaptation of metamorphosis traits in salamanders. Mol. Ecol. 13: 1665–1677. Google Scholar

55.

Wisniewski P.J. & Wisniewski L.M. 1998: Can a salamander change its spots? British Herpetological Society Bulletin 62: 27–28. Google Scholar

56.

Zhang W., Dasmahapatra K.K., Mallet J. et al. 2016: Genome-wide introgression among distantly related Heliconius butterfly species. Genome Biol . 17: 25. Google Scholar

57.

Zöphel U. & Steffens R. 2002: Atlas der Amphibien Sachsens. Sächsisches Landesamt für Umwelt und Geologie , DresdenGoogle Scholar

Appendices

Supplementary online material

Fig. S1. Consensus neighbour joining tree (bootstrap-resampled, random seed = 237534, 10,000 replicates; reconstructed using Geneious 9.0.5, Biomatter Ltd.) of D-loop haplotypes, node numbers show consensus percent support, branches show nucleotide substitutions per site. 2,135 (Balkan and Ukraine individuals, red), SST1(Germany, Salamandra salamandra terrestris), SS1 (Czech and Slovak widespread “haplotype 1”, purple), SS14 (“haplotype 2” from localities at Děčín, Czech Republic, orange), SS59 (“haplotype 3” from locality at Oderské vrchy, Czech Republic, black), SS61 (“haplotype 4” from locality at Lipník nad Bečvou, Czech Republic, yellow) represent haplotypes of samples sequenced in this study that were determined using DnaSP 5.10 (Rozas et al. 2010, Universitat de Barcelona); KY055013.1 and KY055014.1 represent haplotypes from Sudetes and Carpathians respectively in Poland determined by Konowalik et al. (2016); KT3359XX.X represent clade C haplotypes throughout of the Germany determined by Steinfartz et al. (2000); KX9519XX.X represent haplotypes from the Carpathians determined by Vörös et al. (2017). Sslongi (S. s. longirostris) and SSgallaica (S. s. gallainca) represent haplotypes of outgroup evolutionary lineages published by Vences et al. (2014).

Table S1. Tissue sampling sites and isolates identification.

Table S2. Phenotype sampling sites and colour pattern identification (1 – striped, 2 – intermediate, 3 – spotted).

https://www.ivb.cz/wp-content/uploads/JVB-vol.-70-2-2021-Brejcha-et-al.-Fig.-S1-Tables-S1-S2-1.pdf)

Jindřich Brejcha, Karel kodejš, Pavel Benda, Daniel Jablonski, Tomáš Holer, Jan Chmelař, and Jiří Moravec "Variability of colour pattern and genetic diversity of Salamandra salamandra (Caudata: Salamandridae) in the Czech Republic," Journal of Vertebrate Biology 70(2), 21016.1-12, (1 July 2021). https://doi.org/10.25225/jvb.21016
Received: 10 March 2021; Accepted: 18 May 2021; Published: 1 July 2021
JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top