Translator Disclaimer
12 January 2022 Importance of anthropogenic winter roosts for endangered hibernating bats
Przemysław Stachyra, Michał Piskorski, Mirosław Tchórzewski, Klaudia Łopuszyńska-Stachyra, Robert W. Mysłajek
Author Affiliations +

We aimed to assess the importance of anthropogenic roosts for bats hibernating in the Roztocze National Park (south-east Poland), based on data collected from 2009 to 2021. We recorded 310 bats from nine species hibernating in 27 artificial underground roosts (root cellars and basements of buildings). The most abundant and constantly recorded species were Plecotus auritus (60.2%), Barbastella barbastellus (20.6%) and Myotis nattereri (14.2%), while the remaining species can be considered of secondary importance; Plecotus austriacus (1.3%), Myotis myotis (1.9%), Myotis bechsteinii (1.3%), M. daubentonii (0.3%), Myotis mystacinus sensu lato (0.3%) and Eptesicus serotinus (1.3%). An estimate of the Shannon diversity index gave a mean H = 0.947 (SD = 0.247, range 0.377-1.352), while the Buzas and Gibson´s evenness index gave values of E = 0.695 (SD = 0.125, range 0.551-0.940). The Shannon index was positively correlated with the number of recorded bats and varied substantially among years.


Insectivorous bats have high metabolic rates while euthermic and, therefore, have substantial nutritional requirements (Kunz & Fenton 2003). This feature of their biology translates directly into the consumption of large quantities of insects, including pest species that cause significant losses in agriculture and forestry (Lacki et al. 2007, Puig-Montserrat et al. 2015), and they thereby provide significant ecosystem services (Boyles et al. 2011). Bats have relatively low reproduction rates (Barclay et al. 2004), thus have low rates of increase (Voigt & Kingston 2016). Unfortunately, in modern human-dominated landscapes they are endangered by disease, development of harmful human infrastructure and direct mortality, as well as loss and degradation of natural habitats (Frick et al. 2019).

The majority of bat species are primarily associated with forests (Kunz & Fenton 2003, Lacki et al. 2007). In European primeval temperate forests, bats mainly use hollows and spaces under protruding bark as roosts (Ruczyński & Bogdanowicz 2008, Gottfried et al. 2015, Dietz et al. 2018). A decrease in forest cover, increase in forest fragmentation, changes in tree species composition, simplification of stand age structure and finally, the scarcity of dead trees caused by forest management, has decreased the availability of natural roosts for bats (Jung et al. 2012, Russo et al. 2016, Treitler et al. 2016). Consequently, many bat species inhabiting forests utilize a variety of human-made structures as alternative roosts (Mazurska & Ruczyński 2008, Ruczyński et al. 2010, Kurek et al. 2020) and anthropogenic structures can, in some circumstances, be superior than natural roosts (Johnson et al. 2019).

In temperate latitudes winter is a critical season for bats, when lack of food and low temperatures force either a seasonal migration or a search for hibernation roosts that can ensure a stable temperature and high humidity. Bats hibernate in diverse natural shelters, both above ground (e.g. hollow trees) and below ground (e.g. animal burrows, caves). However, they also use various artificial structures, such as tunnels, fortifications, basements of buildings, storage cellars, sewage systems and wells (Kunz & Fenton 2003).

In this paper we assessed the importance of anthropogenic roosts for bats hibernating in Roztocze National Park (south-east Poland), based on data collected over 13 years. Combining this information with evidence from other parts of Europe (Lesiński et al. 2004, Lesiński 2009, Vintulis & Pētersons 2014), we hypothesise that artificial roosts serve as important sites for bat hibernation in this large forest tract.

Material and Methods

Study area

Roztocze National Park (50° 36′ 11.9″ N, 23° 01′ 31.0″ E; 84.8 km2), established in 1974, is situated in the southern Polish uplands. It protects fragments of mainly natural deciduous and mixed forests dominated by stands of Scots pine Pinus sylvestris (35%), European beech Fagus sylvatica (22%) and silver fir Abies alba (16%) (Tittenbrun & Radliński 2019). The climate is a transition between Atlantic and Continental with a mean temperature in January of –2.4 °C, a mean temperature in June of 19 °C, and an annual precipitation ca. 730 mm.

The park is inhabited by at least 16 bat species (Jurczyszyn 1994, Kasprzyk et al. 2004, Bashta et al. 2011, Stolarz & Lesiński 2017, Stachyra et al. 2019), all of which are strictly protected in Poland. Additionally, the national park is also protected as a Natura 2000 site “Roztocze Środkowe” (PLH060017) dedicated to the protection of four bat species: Barbastella barbastellus, Myotis myotis, Myotis bechsteinii and Myotis dasycneme (Standard Data Form 2021).

Table 1.

Characteristics of bat assemblages wintering in Roztocze National Park, 2009-2021.


Table 2.

Species composition of bat assemblages wintering in Roztocze National Park, 2009-2021.


Data collection

We conducted bat monitoring in both root crop cellars and basements of buildings in Roztocze National Park from 2009 to 2021. Field work was conducted mainly during February each year. The number of structures checked for bats varied from 15 to 27 per year (mean = 24, SD = 3.2), depending on the identification of new roosts and their accessibility during winter (Table 1). Species identification was based on external features (Dietz et al. 2009) and as identification of cryptic species from the Myotis mystacinus group (M. mystacinus, M. brandtii, M. alcathoe) during hibernation may lead to some doubts (von Helversen et al. 2001, Bashta et al. 2011), we counted all individuals of these species together and named them Myotis mystacinus sensu lato.

Data analysis and statistics

We described assemblages of bats hibernating in Roztocze National Park using the following parameters:

(1) Dominance D% according to the formula:


where: ni = number of individuals from species i, N = number of individuals from all species.

(2) Constancy C% according to the formula:


where: qi = number of years when species i was recorded, Q = number of years when monitoring was conducted.

(3) Shannon diversity index (H) according to the formula:


where: ni = number of individuals from species i; n = number of individuals from all species (Shannon 1948).

(4) Buzas and Gibson´s Evenness index (E) according to the formula:


where: H = Shannon diversity index; e = base of the natural logarithm; S = number of species (Buzas & Gibson 1969).

We applied the Whittaker index (Whittaker 1960, Wilson & Shmida 1984) to assess differences between diversity indexes among years, following the formula:


where: S = number of species recorded during our study, fi01_01.gif = mean number of species in given year.

Diversity indices were calculated in the Past 3.0 software (Hammer et al. 2001), while correlations were calculated in Statistica 13.3 (TIBCO Software, USA).


We recorded 310 bats from nine species hibernating in artificial underground roosts in Roztocze National Park from 2009 to 2021. On average, we recorded 24 individuals (SD = 12.4, range 8-49) from four species (SD = 1.1, range 2-6) each year (Tables 1 and 2). Neither the number of individuals nor the number of species was correlated with the number of shelters examined in a given year. The number of recorded species was, however, correlated with number of individuals (y = 0.077x + 2.097, R2 = 0.78, P < 0.001).

Table 3.

Differences between species diversity indices of winter assemblages of bats in Roztocze National Park, 2009-2021, characterised by the Whittaker index.


Among bats recorded in winter roosts, Plecotus auritus was by far the most common (D = 60.2%) and was recorded during all years (C = 100%). A substantial proportion of the bat assemblages also contained B. barbastellus (D = 20.6%) and Myotis nattereri (D = 14.2%), which were recorded almost every year (C = 91.7% for both species). The remaining species can be considered of secondary importance, both because of their small contribution to the assemblages and their low constancy – Plecotus austriacus (D = 1.3%, C = 15.4%), M. myotis (D = 1.9%, C = 38.5%), M. bechsteinii (D = 1.3%, C = 15.4%), Myotis daubentonii (D = 0.3%, C = 7.7%), M. mystacinus sensu lato (D = 0.3%, C = 7.7) and Eptesicus serotinus (D = 1.3, C = 23.1%) (Table 2).

An estimate of the Shannon diversity index gave a mean of H = 0.947 (SD = 0.247, range 0.377-1.352), while the Buzas and Gibson´s Evenness index gave values of E = 0.695 (SD = 0.125, range 0.551-0.940). The Shannon diversity index was positively correlated (y = 0.015x + 0.596, R2 = 0.54, P < 0.001) with the number of bats recorded in winter roosts (Table 1), but it did not correlate with evenness indices. Diversity indices were not associated with either the mean temperature in February or the number of days with temperatures below zero in February. Pairwise comparison of diversity indices varied greatly among years from βw = 0 to βw = 0.600, though on average this parameter was moderate βw = 0.266 (SD = 0.132) (Table 3).


In line with our expectations, small anthropogenic roosts, such as storage cellars and basements, were used for hibernation by several species of bats wintering in the Roztocze National Park. The most numerous species recorded wintering in the park was P. auritus, which is also one of the most common bats in Poland (Sachanowicz et al. 2006). Furthermore, this species is the most abundant bat hibernating in cellars and basements in northern and western Poland (Lesiński et al. 2004, Lesiński 2009) and Latvia (Vintulis & Pētersons 2014).

Among bat species hibernating in anthropogenic roosts in Roztocze National Park there are three listed as conservation targets for the Natura 2000 site “Roztocze Środkowe”, i.e. B. barbastellus, M. myotis and M. bechsteinii (Standard Data Form 2021). Moreover, the abundance of B. barbastellus in cellars and basements in the national park was higher than in similar winter roosts in other parts of Poland (Lesiński et al. 2004, Lesiński 2009), underlining the importance of such shelters for local populations of this species.

Barbastella barbastellus prefers to hibernate at lower temperatures than M. myotis and M. bechsteinii (Bogdanowicz & Urbańczyk 1983, Webb et al. 1996). Recent studies have indicated that a warming climate will likely hamper the use of well-insulated winter roosts by species preferring colder conditions, such as B. barbastellus (Gottfried et al. 2020). Thus conservation action regarding management of underground bat roosts (Mitchell-Jones et al. 2007) should take into consideration environmental changes (Rydell et al. 2018, 2020). De Bruyn et al. (2021) predicted that under climate change, when winter conditions are expected to be milder, bats such as B. barbastellus may begin hibernating in trees, therefore the availability of old-growth forests will be essential for their long-term survival. Roztocze National Park offers patches of old beech forests, mainly in the strict protection zone, so the reduction of old tree extraction in the remaining zones, where active forest management is allowed, would seem to be crucial for bat conservation in the future.

Our data confirmed earlier observations that protection of anthropogenic roosts is important for bat conservation in forest tracts, including protected woodlands (Lacki et al. 2007). The composition of bat assemblages hibernating in anthropogenic roosts varied considerably between years. Therefore, we suggest that conservation action should be based on long-term data on the number and species composition of hibernating bats rather than single surveys of roosts (Mitchell-Jones et al. 2007).


We are grateful to Paweł Marczakowski, Bogusław Radliński and Andrzej Tittenbrun from the Roztocze National Park for the assistance. We are grateful to Dr. Chris Young for linguistic advice, and an anonymous reviewer for comments that improved our manuscript. Author contributions: P. Stachyra – conceptualization, methodology, investigation, writing original draft; M. Piskorski – investigation; M. Tchórzewski – investigation; K. Łopuszańska-Stachyra – investigation; R.W. Mysłajek – conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis, writing original draft, review and editing.



Barclay R.M.R., Ulmer J., MacKenzie C.J.A. et al. 2004: Variation in the reproductive rate of bats. Can. J. Zool. 82: 688–693. Google Scholar


Bashta A.-T., Piskorski M., Mysłajek R.W. et al. 2011: Myotis alcathoe in Poland and Ukraine: new data on its status and habitat in Central Europe. Folia Zool . 60: 1–4. Google Scholar


Bogdanowicz W. & Urbańczyk Z. 1983: Some ecological aspects of bats hibernating in city of Poznań. Acta Theriol . 28: 371–385. Google Scholar


Boyles J.G., Cryan P.M., McCracken G.F. & Kunz T.H. 2011: Economic importance of bats in agriculture. Science 332: 41–42. Google Scholar


Buzas M.A. & Gibson T.G. 1969: Species diversity: benthonic Foraminifera in Western North Atlantic. Science 163: 72–75. Google Scholar


De Bruyn L., Gyselings R., Kirkpatrick L. et al. 2021: Temperature driven hibernation site use in the Western barbastelle Barbastella barbastellus (Schreber, 1774). Sci. Rep. 11: 1464. Google Scholar


Dietz M., Brombacher M., Erasmy M. et al. 2018: Bat community and roost site selection of tree-dwelling bats in a well-preserved European lowland forest. Acta Chiropt . 20: 117–127. Google Scholar


Dietz C., von Helversen O. & Nill D. 2009: Bats of Britain, Europe and Northwest Africa. A & C Black , London, UK . Google Scholar


Frick W.F., Kingston T. & Flanders J. 2019: A review of the major threats and challenges to global bat conservation. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1469: 5–25. Google Scholar


Gottfried I., Gottfried T., Fuszara E. et al. 2015: Breeding sites of the barbastelle Barbastella barbastellus (Schreber, 1774) in Poland. NorthWest. J. Zool. 11: 194–203. Google Scholar


Gottfried I., Gottfried T., Lesiński G. et al. 2020: Long-term changes in winter abundance of the barbastelle Barbastella barbastellus in Poland and the climate change – are current monitoring schemes still reliable for cryophilic bat species? PLOS ONE 15: e0227912. Google Scholar


Hammer Ø., Harper D.A.T. & Ryan P.D. 2001: PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 4: 1–9. Google Scholar


Johnson J.S., Treanor J.J., Slusher A.C. & Lacki M.J. 2019: Buildings provide vital habitat for little brown myotis (Myotis lucifugus) in a high-elevation landscape. Ecosphere 10: e02925. Google Scholar


Jung K., Kaiser S., Böhm S. et al. 2012: Moving in three dimensions: effects of structural complexity on occurrence and activity of insectivorous bats in managed forest stands. J. Appl. Ecol. 49: 523–531. Google Scholar


Jurczyszyn M. 1994: Bats (Chiroptera) of the Roztoczański National Park and the surrounding. Fragm. Faun. 37: 389–399. ( in Polish with English summary ) Google Scholar


Kasprzyk K., Kitowski I., Czochra K. & Krawczyk R. 2004: Bats in the diet of owls from the southern part of the Lublin region (SE Poland). Myotis 41–42: 75–80. Google Scholar


Kunz T.H. & Fenton M.B. 2003: Bat ecology. University of Chicago Press , Chicago, USA . Google Scholar


Kurek K., Gewartowska O., Tołkacz K. et al. 2020: Home range size, habitat selection and roost use by the whiskered bat (Myotis mystacinus) in human-dominated montane landscapes. PLOS ONE 15: e0237243. Google Scholar


Lacki M., Hayes J.P. & Kurta A. 2007: Bats in forests. Conservation and management. Johns Hopkins University Press , Baltimore, USA . Google Scholar


Lesiński G. 2009: Bats at small subterranean winter roosts: effect of forest cover in the surrounding landscape. Pol. J. Ecol. 57: 761–767. Google Scholar


Lesiński G., Kowalski M., Domański J. et al. 2004: The importance of small cellars to bat hibernation in Poland. Mammalia 68: 345–352. Google Scholar


Mazurska K. & Ruczyński I. 2008: Bats select buildings in clearings in Białowieża Primeval Forest. Acta Theriol . 10: 331–338. Google Scholar


Mitchell-Jones A.J., Bihari Z., Masing M. & Rodrigues L. 2007: Protecting and managing underground sites for bats. EUROBATS publication series no. 2 , Bonn, Germany . Google Scholar


Puig-Montserrat X., Torre I., López-Baucells A. et al. 2015: Pest control service provided by bats in Mediterranean rice paddies: linking agroecosystems structure to ecological functions. Mamm. Biol. 80: 237–245. Google Scholar


Ruczyński I. & Bogdanowicz W. 2008: Summer roost selection by tree-dwelling bats Nyctalus noctula and N. leisleri: a multiscale analysis. J. Mammal. 89: 942–951. Google Scholar


Ruczyński I., Nicholls B., MacLeod C.D. & Racey P.A. 2010: Selection of roosting habitats by Nyctalus noctula and Nyctalus leisleri in Białowieża Forest – adaptive response to forest management? Forest Ecol. Manag. 259: 1633–1641. Google Scholar


Russo D., Billington G., Bontadina F. et al. 2016: Identifying key research objectives to make European forests greener for bats. Front. Ecol. Evol. 4: 87. Google Scholar


Rydell J., Eklöf J., Fransson H. & Lind S. 2018: Long-term increase in hibernating bats in Swedish mines – effect of global warming? Acta Chiropt . 20: 421–426. Google Scholar


Rydell J., Elfström M., Eklöf J. & Sánchez-Navarro S. 2020: Dramatic decline of northern bat Eptesicus nilssonii in Sweden over 30 years. R. Soc. Open Sci. 7: 191754. Google Scholar


Sachanowicz K., Ciechanowski M. & Piksa K. 2006: Distribution patterns, species richness and status of bats in Poland. Vespertilio 9–10: 151–173. Google Scholar


Shannon C.E. 1948: A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27: 379–423, 623–656 . Google Scholar


Stachyra P., Marczakowski P. & Tchórzewski M. 2019: Fauna protection plan of the Roztocze National Park. In: Tittenbrun A. (ed.), Protection plan of the Roztocze National Park along with the materials for its creation. Roztoczański Park Narodowy, Zwierzyniec , Poland : 153–183. ( in Polish ) Google Scholar


Standard Data Form 2021: Roztocze Środkowe PLH PLH060017. Downloaded December 2021. Google Scholar


Stolarz P. & Lesiński G. 2017: The Bechstein's bat Myotis bechsteinii as a prey of the long-eared owl Asio otus in Western Roztocze. Kulon 22: 142–145. ( in Polish with English summary ) Google Scholar


Tittenbrun A. & Radliński B. 2019: Protection plan of forest ecosystems of the Roztocze National Park. In: Tittenbrun A. (ed.), Protection plan of the Roztocze National Park along with the materials for its creation. Roztoczański Park Narodowy, Zwierzyniec , Poland : 101–122. ( in Polish ) Google Scholar


Treitler J.T., Heim O., Tschapka M. & Jung K. 2016: The effect of local land use and loss of forests on bats and nocturnal insects. Ecol. Evol. 6: 4289–4297. Google Scholar


Vintulis V. & Pētersons G. 2014: Root cellars are important winter roosts for brown long-eared bats (Plecotus auritus) and northern bats (Eptesicus nilssonii) in Latvia. Mammalia 78: 85–91. Google Scholar


Voigt C.C. & Kingston T. 2016: Bats in the Anthropocene: conservation of bats in a changing world. Springer , Heidelberg, Germany . Google Scholar


von Helversen O., Heller K.-G., Mayer F. et al. 2001: Cryptic mammalian species: a new species of whiskered bat (Myotis alcathoe n.sp.) in Europe. Naturwissenschaften 88: 217–223. Google Scholar


Webb P.I., Speakman J.R. and Racey P.A. 1996. How hot is a hibernaculum? A review of the temperatures at which bats hibernate. Can. J. Zool. 74: 761–765. Google Scholar


Whittaker R.H. 1960: Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol. Monogr. 30: 279–338. Google Scholar


Wilson M.V. & Shmida A. 1984. Measuring beta diversity with presence-absence data. J. Ecol. 72: 1055–1064. Google Scholar
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited.
Przemysław Stachyra, Michał Piskorski, Mirosław Tchórzewski, Klaudia Łopuszyńska-Stachyra, and Robert W. Mysłajek "Importance of anthropogenic winter roosts for endangered hibernating bats," Journal of Vertebrate Biology 71(21071), 21071.1-7, (12 January 2022).
Received: 27 October 2021; Accepted: 2 December 2021; Published: 12 January 2022

Back to Top