Jarunee Siengsanan, Kridsada Chaichoune, Rassameepen Phonaknguen, Ladawan Sariya, Phirom Prompiram, Waraporn Kocharin, Sririporn Tangsudjai, Sarin Suwanpukdee, Witthawat Wiriyarat, Rattapan Pattanarangsan, Ian Robertson, Stuart D. Blacksell, Parntep Ratanakorn
Journal of Wildlife Diseases 45 (3), 740-747, (1 July 2009) https://doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-45.3.740
KEYWORDS: H5N1, highly pathogenic avian influenza, surveillance, wild birds
Wild bird surveillance for highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 virus from 2004 to 2007 in Thailand indicated that the prevalence of infection with avian influenza H5N1 virus in wild birds was low (1.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.7–1.2, 60/6,263 pooled samples). However, the annual prevalence varied considerably over this period, with a peak of 2.7% (95% CI: 1.4, 4.1) in 2004. Prevalence dropped to 0.5% (95% CI: 0.3, 0.8]) and 0.6% (95% CI: 0.3, 1.0) in 2005 and 2006, respectively, and then increased to 1.8% (95% CI: 1.0, 2.6) in 2007. During this period, 16 species from 12 families of wild birds tested positive for H5N1 virus infection. All samples from juvenile birds were negative for H5N1 virus, whereas 0.6% (95% CI: 0.4, 0.9) of pooled samples from adult birds were positive. Most positive samples originated from peridomestic resident species. Infected wild bird samples were only found in provinces where poultry outbreaks had occurred. Detection of H5N1 virus infection in wild birds was reported up to 3 yr after eradication of the poultry outbreaks in those provinces. As observed with outbreaks in poultry, the frequencies of H5N1 outbreaks in wild birds were significantly higher in winter. Further understanding of the mechanisms of persistence and ongoing HPAI H5N1 transmission between wild birds and domestic poultry is needed.