How to translate text using browser tools
1 April 2013 ORAL RABIES VACCINATION VARIATION IN TETRACYCLINE BIOMARKING AMONG OHIO RACCOONS
Timothy P. Algeo, Gary Norhenberg, Robert Hale, Andrew Montoney, Richard B. Chipman, Dennis Slate
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Oral rabies vaccination (ORV) programs have traditionally relied on tetracycline marking as an index to bait uptake. Whether tetracycline serves well in this capacity depends on its deposition affinity and ability to be detected consistently among tissues selected for analysis from target species. We evaluated samples from 760 hunter-harvested raccoons (Procyon lotor) from areas in Ohio where ORV had been conducted during 1998, 1999, and 2001. Tetracycline marking was evaluated within and among first premolar (PM1), second premolar (PM2), and canine (CN) teeth, and mandibular bone (MB) by side (left versus right); and by tissue type. Tetracycline detection ranged from 6.5% in PM1 in 1998 to 56.3% in right-side MB in 2001. PM1 teeth were less frequently marked (21.7%) than PM2 (27.7%), CN (33.0%), or MB (42.0%). Tetracycline detection was similar in left and right PM1, PM2, and CN teeth, but differed in MB. Tetracycline marking was significantly different among all tissue types.

Timothy P. Algeo, Gary Norhenberg, Robert Hale, Andrew Montoney, Richard B. Chipman, and Dennis Slate "ORAL RABIES VACCINATION VARIATION IN TETRACYCLINE BIOMARKING AMONG OHIO RACCOONS," Journal of Wildlife Diseases 49(2), 332-337, (1 April 2013). https://doi.org/10.7589/2011-11-327
Received: 16 November 2012; Accepted: 1 December 2012; Published: 1 April 2013
KEYWORDS
Bait uptake
biomarker
oral rabies vaccination
ORV
Procyon lotor
raccoon
tetracycline hydrochloride
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top