Translator Disclaimer
1 February 2010 A Conservation Institution for the 21st Century: Implications for State Wildlife Agencies
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The wildlife conservation institution (Institution) needs to reform to maintain legitimacy and relevancy in the 21st century. Institutional reform is inherently slow. Limitations resulting from historical and resource dependencies between state wildlife agencies and hunters have left the Institution poorly positioned to meet changing ecological and social complexities. In this paper, we suggest that an ideal Institution would have the following 4 components: broad-based funding, trustee-based governance, multidisciplinary science as the basis of recommendations from professional staff, and involvement of diverse stakeholders and partners. Our suggestions reflect the fundamental tenets of the Public Trust Doctrine, which we believe is the foundation of the Institution. In bringing forth these ideas, we hope to encourage discussion about how the Institution should reform to meet the changing needs of society.

Cynthia A. Jacobson, John F. Organ, DANIEL J. DECKER, Gordon R. Batcheller, and Len Carpenter "A Conservation Institution for the 21st Century: Implications for State Wildlife Agencies," Journal of Wildlife Management 74(2), 203-209, (1 February 2010). https://doi.org/10.2193/2008-485
Published: 1 February 2010
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top