Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 January 2016 Cytological studies of some Indian liverworts
Sunita Kapila
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Cytological studies are made in nine species of liverworts belonging to seven genera collected from different areas of Chakrata and Deoban in Uttarakhand, W. Himalaya. The chromosome numbers in four species (Calypogeia renistipula Steph., n = 9; Cephalozia gollani Steph., n = 9; Chiloscyphus campanulatus Steph., n = 9; C. coadunatus ( Sw.) Engel & Schust., n = 9) are recorded for the first time. In Porella platyphylla (L.) Pfeiff. n = 9 is counted for the first time in India. Precocious disjunction of one bivalent in the chromosome complement is observed in Frullania retusa Mitt. Laggards are observed in Calypogeia renistipula.

Of the nearly 9000 liverworts species (Crandall-Stotler and Stotler 2000), so far only 697 species representing 156 genera are known cytologically (Anand et al. 1989, Kumar and Anand 1990, Fritsch 1991, Kumar and Kapila 2003).

In India, so far 850 species of liverworts belonging to 140 genera and 52 families are reported (Norkett, cf. Chopra 1975). Despite the rich diversity of bryophytes in the Indian subcontinent, cytological study of this group has not received deserved attention.

Mehra (1938) initiated some work on Indian liverworts. He for the first time reported the chromosome numbers for three members of family Codoniaceae. Most of the earlier chromosome number reports (Kashyap and Pande 1922, Chavan 1937, Mehra and Mehra 1939, Srinivasan 1940, 1944, Mahabale and Bhate 1945, Mahabale and Gorji 1947, Mahabale and Deshpande 1947, Kachroo 1953, 1955, Mehra and Handoo 1953, Mehra and Sokhi 1972, 1977, Sokhi and Mehra 1973) were incidental to morphological and developmental studies on liverworts.

Studies focused on cytology of Indian liverworts were pioneered by Mehra (1948, 1959, 1977), Srinivasan (1940, 1944), Mahable and Gorji (1941), Chopra and Udar (1957), Udar and Chopra (1957), Mehra and Pathania (1959), Kanwal (1974, 1975, 1976a, 1976b), Mehra and Kumar (1979, 1980). Later, Anand et al. (1989), Kumar and Anand (1990) and Kumar and Kapila (2003) made significant contributions to the cytology of West Himalayan liverworts.

The goal of present study is to gain cytological information about the liverworts of Deoban and Chakrata in Uttarakhand and further see how far this data could be useful in taxonomy and phylogeny of the bryophytes.

Material and methods

Collections were from Deoban and Chakrata in Uttarakhand. To study the meiotic chromosomes, plants with suitable capsules of green colour were fixed in Farmer's fluid 1:3 acetic alcohol for 24 h and then stored in 90% alcohol. To prepare slides of dividing spore mother cells, the capsule was slightly punctured with a needle in a drop of 2% acetocarmine. The debris was removed with a fine tipped iron needle. A cover slip was put on and the slide was heated to 50–60° C for a few seconds and pressed in the folds of blotting paper to squeeze out the sporogenous tissue. To make a slide permanent, its cover slip was separated by placing the slide in absolute alcohol or n-butyl alcohol in a petri dish. Then the cover slip and the slide were passed separately through 1:3, 1:6, 1:9 acetic alcohol and finally through absolute alcohol and mounted separately in euparal.

The families and genera of liverworts are arranged according to Schuster (1984). The voucher specimens of the studied taxa are deposited in the herbarium of Dept of Botany, Panjab University, Chandigarh and their reference numbers with further relevant data are given in Table 1.

Table 1.

Summary of chromosome numbers of the studied taxa.

t01_07.gif

Observations and results

FAMILY: CALYPOGEIACEAE
Calypogeia renistipula Steph. — n = 9 (Fig. 1–2)

  • The plants with sporophytes in the right stage were collected in Deoban (altitude 2360 m), and found growing on wet soil. Shoots with more or less imbricate leaves, each leaf ovate entire and the reniform amphigastria distant helped in identification of the species.

  • The chromosome number of this species was not known previously.

  • Of the nine darkly stained and well spread bivalents observed at metaphase-I (Fig. 1), two were larger in size and the remaining ones showed gradation in size. One laggard was observed at telophase-I (Fig. 2).

  • Fourteen species of Calypogeia are known cytologically. The distribution of chromosome numbers: n = 9 (11 species) and n = 18 (6 species) indicates the base number to be x = 9 and doubling of chromosomes has played a significant role in the evolution within the genus.

  • FAMILY: CEPHALOZIACEAE
    Cephalozia gollani Steph. — n = 9 (Fig. 3)

  • This species, also collected in Deoban (altitude 2360 m), grew on moist soil. Leaves were imbricate, the lack of amphigastria and a capsule borne on a long seta helped in identification of the plant.

  • The chromosomes of this species are also studied for the first time.

  • The chromosome complement comprises nine darkly stained bivalents at metaphase-I (Fig. 3). One bivalent was relatively small, the remaining members of the set were of variable size. The course of meiosis was observed to be normal.

  • Cephalozia sp. Dumort. — n = 9 (Fig. 4)

  • This taxon, collected at Chakrata (altitude 1814 m), was found growing on soil mixed with humus. Leaves were obliquely inserted, succubous, generally bilobed and with entire margin.

  • The chromosome complement comprised nine darkly stained bivalents at metaphase-I (Fig. 4). The course of meiosis was observed to be normal.

  • Of the 43 species included in the genus, only six are known cytologically. The recorded chromosome numbers are: n = 9 (2 species), n = 18 (3 species) and n = 27 (1 species). The frequent occurrence of multiplied genomes (n = 18 and n = 27) shows that polyploidy is fairly widespread in the genus.

  • Figure 1–11.

    (1) Calypogeia renistipula — n = 9, metaphase - I, showing nine bivalents, (2) telophase - I, showing a laggard; (3) Cephalozia gollani — n = 9, metaphase - I, showing nine bivalents; (4) Cephalozia sp. — n = 9, metaphase - I, showing nine bivalents; (5) Chiloscyphus campanulatus — n = 9, metaphase - I, showing nine bivalents; (6) C. coadunatus — n = 9, metaphase - I, showing nine bivalents, (7) note the precociously disjoined one bivalent; (8) Radula complanata — n = 9, metaphase - I, showing nine bivalents; (9) Porella platyphylla — n = 9, metaphase - I, showing nine bivalents; (10) P. plumosa — n = 9, metaphase - I, showing eighteen bivalents; (11) Frullania retusa — n = 9, metaphase - I, showing nine bivalents. Note the precociously disjoined one bivalent.

    f01_07.jpg

    FAMILY: GEOCALYCACEAE
    Chiloscyphus campanulatus Steph. — n = 9 (Fig. 5)

  • The plants with sporophytes of the right stage were collected from Chakrata (altitude 1814 m) and were found growing on soil. This species is characterized by small amphigastria divided at apex, with a v-shaped notch and long ellipsoidal capsule.

  • This species is also studied cytologically for the first time.

  • The nine bivalents observed at metaphase-I were fastly stained and well spread (Fig. 5). The bivalents varied from one large to five of median and three of smaller size.

  • C. coadunatus ( Sw.) Engel & Schust. — n = 9 (Fig. 6–7)

  • This taxon is characterized by alternate leaves, small underleaves with a long, widely spreading, subulate tooth on both sides. The material from Deoban (altitude 2360 m) grew on stony soil.

  • The chromosome number of this species was not known previously.

  • Of the nine bivalents observed at metaphase-I, the smallest one showed precocious disjunction (Fig. 7). The bivalents of the chromosome complement showed clumping and stickiness.

  • Of the twelve cytologically known species of Chiloscyphus, eleven had n = 9 which is considered the base number in the genus. The occurrence of n = 18 in one species, C. pallescens (Enrh ex Hoffm.) Dumort. was shown to be the result of doubling (autodiploidy) (Newton 1973).

  • FAMILY: RADULACEAE
    Radula complanata (L.) Dumort. — n = 9 (Fig. 8)

  • This taxon, collected from Deoban (altitude 2360 m), was found growing on soil mixed with pebbles. Imbricate and strongly spreading leaves helped in easy identification of the species.

  • The present chromosome count, n = 9 differs from earlier reports from Japan (n = 6; Tatuno 1935), France (n = 8), Germany (n = 8; Müller 1951–1958, Fritsch 1984), India (n = 12; Mehra and Pathania 1959), Europe (n = 16; Heitz 1942) and Caucasus (n = 16; Fritsch 1987).

  • Nine darkly stained and well spread bivalents were observed at metaphase-I (Fig. 8). The course of meiosis was normal.

  • Sixteen species of Radula are known cytologically. Of these, eight species counted to n = 6 and ten species had n = 8. The base number of this genus could be x = 6 or x = 8. The present finding of n = 9 may be the result of an aneuploid gain of one chromosome from x = 8.

  • FAMILY: PORELLACEAE
    Porella platyphylla ( L.) Pfeiff. — n = 9 (Fig. 9)

  • This taxon is characterized by large lobed leaves, dentate female bracts and a ciliate perianth mouth. The plants were found growing on soil at Deoban (altitude 2360 m).

  • This species is studied for the first time in India.

  • The present chromosome count n = 9 agrees with the previous findings in some European populations (Newton 1973, Fritsch 1984, Kuta et al. 1984). Nine darkly stained and well spread bivalents were observed at metaphase-I (Fig. 9). The course of meiosis was normal.

  • Porella plumosa ( Mitt.) Parihar — n = 18 (Fig. 10)

  • This taxon is characterized by having leaves with small ovate lobule and by having amphigastria slightly larger than the lobule of the leaves. The fertile material, collected from Deoban (altitude 2360 m), was found growing on stony soil.

  • The present chromosome count n = 18, varies from an earlier finding (n = 7+m, Mehra and Pathania 1959) from an Indian population. Of the 18 bivalents observed at metaphase-I 6 (Fig. 10) two were relatively larger in size. The course of meiosis was normal.

  • The genus Porella includes 108 species, of which chromosomes have been counted in only 20. The chromosome numbers vary from n = 6 (1 species), n = 8 (17 species) and n = 9 (4 species). The prevalence of n = 8 suggests that to be the base number in this genus, which might in four species have given rise to n = 9 through aneuploid gain of one chromosome.

  • FAMILY: JUBULACEAE
    Frullania retusa Mitt. — n = 9 (Fig. 11)

  • This taxon, collected from Deoban (altitude 2360 m), was found growing on soil. The species is characterized by entire leaves and narrowly inserted amphigastria.

  • The chromosome number n = 9 agrees with the previous findings (Mehra and Pathania 1959). Of the nine darkly stained bivalents observed at metaphase-I (Fig. 11), one showed precocious disjunction. The course of meiosis was normal.

  • The genus Frullania includes 613 species, of which 62 are known cytologically. The chromosome numbers vary from n = 8 (23 species), n = 9 (57 species), n = 10 (4 species) and n = 17 (2 species). The cited cytological data suggest that x = 9 probably is the base number of the genus and n = 8 and n = 10 having arisen from it through aneuploidy. Polyploidy followed by aneuploid loss of one chromosome has given rise to n = 17 in two species.

  • The frequent occurrence of n = 9 accompanied by its multiples (n = 18, 27) also known from other taxa of Jungermanniales indicates it to be the basic chromosome number of the order.

  • Since cytological data are known for less than 8% of all liverworts, it is desirable to continue such studies to gain more of such information from this group of plants.

  • References

    1.

    Anand, S., Kumar, S. S. and Kaur, B. 1989. Cytological observations on some West Himalayan Liverworts II. — Lindbergia 15: 99–102. Google Scholar

    2.

    Chavan, A. R. 1937. A morphological study of Cyathodium barodae. — Am. J. Bot. 24: 484—492. Google Scholar

    3.

    Chopra, N. and Udar, R. 1957. Cytotaxonomic studies in the genus Riccia (Mich.) L. II. R. crystallina L. and R. cruciata Kash. — J. Indian Bot. Soc. 36: 535—538. Google Scholar

    4.

    Chopra, R. S. 1975. Taxonomy of Indian mosses (an introduction). — CSIR, New Delhi. Google Scholar

    5.

    Crandall-Stotler, B. and Stotler, R. E. 2000. Morphology and classification of the Marchantiophyta. — In: Shaw, A. J. and Goffinet, B. (eds), Bryophyte biology. Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 21—70. Google Scholar

    6.

    Fritsch, R. 1984. Zytologische Untersuchungen an Bryophyten aus dem Harz II. Chromosomenzahlen weiterer Lebermoose. — Herzogia 6: 345—353. Google Scholar

    7.

    Fritsch, R. 1987. Chromosomes of some liverworts from the Caucacus. — Abstracta Bot. 9, Suppl. 2: 241—244. Google Scholar

    8.

    Fritsch, R. 1991. Index to Bryophyte chromosome counts. — Bryophyt. Biblioth. 40: 1—352. J. Cramer, Berlin. Google Scholar

    9.

    Heitz, E. 1942. Über die Beziehungen zwischen Polyploidie und Gemischtgeschlechtlichkeit bei Moosen. — Schr. JuliusKlaus-Stiftung 17: 444–448. Google Scholar

    10.

    Kachroo, P. 1953. Observations on Aneura indica St. — J. Univ. Gauhati. 4: 313–317. Google Scholar

    11.

    Kachroo, P. 1955. A note on the morphology of some species of Riccia. — Bryologist 58: 134–136. Google Scholar

    12.

    Kanwal, H. S. 1974. The chromosome numbers in Conocephalum conicum (L.) Dum. — Curr. Sci. 43: 664–665. Google Scholar

    13.

    Kanwal, H. S. 1975. Evidence of polyploidy in Stephensoniella brevipedunculata Kash. — Curr. Sci. 44: 367–368. Google Scholar

    14.

    Kanwal, H. S. 1976a. Cytology of Reboulia hemisphaerica (L.) Raddi. — Geobios 3: 58–59. Google Scholar

    15.

    Kanwal, H. S. 1976b. Cytology of Asterella mussuriensis (Kash.) Kachroo. — Geobios 3: 106–107. Google Scholar

    16.

    Kashyap, S. R. and Pande, S. K. 1922. A contribution to the life history of Aneura indica St. — J. Indian Bot. 3: 79–89. Google Scholar

    17.

    Kumar, S. S. and Anand, S. 1990. Cytological observations on some West Himalayan Liverworts-I. — J. Cytol. 25: 1–11. Google Scholar

    18.

    Kumar, S. S and Kapila, S. 2003. Cytomorphological observations on Lunularia cruciate (L.) Dum. — Phytomorphology 53: 197–200. Google Scholar

    19.

    Kuta, E., Przywara, L. and Ochyra, R. 1984. Chromosome studies on Polish bryophytes. — Bryologische Beit. 3: 28–45. Google Scholar

    20.

    Mahabale, T. S. and Gorji, G. H. 1941. Chromosomes of Riccia himalayensis Steph. — Curr. Sci. 10: 25–29. Google Scholar

    21.

    Mahabale, T. S. and Bhate, D. D. 1945. The structure and life history of Fimbriaria angusta St. — J. Univ. Bombay 13: 5–15. Google Scholar

    22.

    Mahabale, T. S. and Deshpande, S. R. 1947. Life-history of Plagiochasma articulatum Kash. — J. Univ. Bombay 15: 23–37. Google Scholar

    23.

    Mahabale, T. S. and Gorji, G. H. 1947. On the chromosome complex of two species of Riccia. — J. Univ. Bombay 16: 1–6. Google Scholar

    24.

    Mehra, P. N. 1938. A study of the chromosome number in some Indian members of the family Codoniaceae. — Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci. B 8: 1–7. Google Scholar

    25.

    Mehra, P. N. 1948. Chromosome number in Cryptomitrium himalayense Kash. — J. Indian Bot. Soc. 27: 103–105. Google Scholar

    26.

    Mehra, P. N. 1959. Cytological investigations on some Marchantiales of the Western Himalayas and Punjab Plain. — Proc. 9th Int. Bot. Congr. 2: 259. Google Scholar

    27.

    Mehra, P. N. 1977. Cytology of some Indian dioecious and monoecious hepatics. — J. Hatt. Bot. Lab. 43: 137—156. Google Scholar

    28.

    Mehra, P. N. and Mehra, H. L. 1939. Life history of Stephensoniella brevipedunculata Kash. — Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci. 9: 287–315. Google Scholar

    29.

    Mehra, P. N. and Handoo, O. N. 1953. Morphology of An thoceros erectus and A. himalayensis and the phylogeny of the Anthocerotales. — Böt. Gaz. 114: 371–382. Google Scholar

    30.

    Mehra, P. N. and Pathania, R S. 1959. Chromosome numbers in some western Himalayan acrogynous Jungermanniales. — Bryologist 62: 242–247. Google Scholar

    31.

    Mehra, P. N. and Sokhi, J. K. 1972. Embryology of Cyathodium flabellatum Mehra. — J. Hatt. Bot. Lab. 36: 17–53. Google Scholar

    32.

    Mehra, P. N. and Sokhi, J. K. 1977. Embryology of Cryptomitri um himalayense Kash. — J. Hatt. Bot. Lab. 43: 157–190. Google Scholar

    33.

    Mehra, P. N. and Kumar, D. 1979. Chromosomes in Aneura indica St. Misc. — Bryol. Lichenol. 8: 85–86. Google Scholar

    34.

    Mehra, P. N. and Kumar, D. 1980. Cytology of two Indian Calobryales. — J. Hatt. Bot. Lab. 47: 57–61. Google Scholar

    35.

    Müller, K. 1951–1958. Die Lebermoose Europas. — In: L. Rabenhorst's Kryptogamenflora von Deutschland. Osterreich und der Schweiz. Band VI. 3 Aufl. Leipzig. Google Scholar

    36.

    Newton, M. E. 1973. Chromosome studies in some British and Irish bryophytes II. — J. Bryol. 7: 379–398. Google Scholar

    37.

    Schuster, R. M. 1984. Evolution, Phylogeny and classification of the Hepaticae. — In: Schuster, R. M. (ed.), New manual of bryology. Vol. II. Hattori Bot. Lab. Nichinan, Miyazaki, Japan, pp. 892–1070. Google Scholar

    38.

    Sokhi, J. K. and Mehra, P. N. 1973. Comparative embryology of Athalamia pinguis Falc. and A. pusilla ( St.) Kash. — J. Hatt. Bot. Lab. 37: 1–54. Google Scholar

    39.

    Srinivasan, K. S. 1940. On the morphology, life-history and cytology of Riccia himalayensis St. — J. Madras Univ. B 12: 59–80. Google Scholar

    40.

    Srinivasan, K. S. 1944. The developmental morphology and cytology of Marchantia palmata. — J. Madras Univ. 15: 101–132. Google Scholar

    41.

    Tatuno, S. 1935. Heterochromosomen der Lebermoosen I. Heterochromosomen bei einigen Arten unter Jungemanniales. — Bot. Mag. Tokyo 49: 628–635. Google Scholar

    42.

    Udar, R. and Chopra, N. 1957. Cytotaxonomic studies in the genus Riccia (Mich.) L. I. R. billardieri Mont. et N and R. gangetica Ahmad. — J. Indian Bot. Soc. 36: 191–195. Google Scholar
    © 2016 The Authors. This is an Open Access article.
    Sunita Kapila "Cytological studies of some Indian liverworts," Lindbergia 39(4), 7-11, (1 January 2016). https://doi.org/10.25227/linbg.01067
    Accepted: 11 March 2016; Published: 1 January 2016
    Back to Top