Translator Disclaimer
1 February 2018 Range extensions for the rare moss Plagiothecium handelii, and its transfer to the resurrected genus Ortholimnobium
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Plagiothecium handelii is newly recorded for Europe (Austria and Romania) and eastern North America (Tennessee, USA). This dainty species was previously known only from Yunnan and Sichuan Provinces, China. Morphologically, the disjunctive populations belong to a single species. A 27-taxon phylogeny of Plagiothecium based on nuclear ITS and plastid rpl16 intron DNA sequence data resolved Austrian and Chinese populations of P. handelii as sisters, in a clade with P. paleaceum, a julaceous Himalayan species with cochleariform leaves. In contrast, P. handelii is a filiform plant with distant, ovate-acuminate leaves. In sequence identity the three terminals have a similar level of variation, suggesting that the geographic disjunction between the two populations of P. handelii is quite old. Morphologically and genetically the clade is a well defined lineage (Ortholimnobium) that is transitional between Plagiothecium s.str. and Struckia. The new combinations O. paleaceum and O. handelii are made. In Europe, O. handelii should be classified as vulnerable.

Plagiothecium handelii Broth, is a poorly known pleurocarpous moss. It was described by Brotherus (1929) from several collections made by Heinrich von Handel-Mazzetti in northwestern Yunnan Province, China, in 1915 and 1916. It resembles an etiolated form of P. cavifolium (Brid.) Z. Iwats. with concave, ovate-acuminate leaves with attenuate tips. It differs from the latter species in its pseudo-stipitate habit, narrower leaf cell net, and cortical hyalodermis composed of rectangular stem cells that detach with the leaves alongside the large leaf decurrencies that are typical of the genus (Fig. 1). In these respects, P. handelii also resembles an etiolated form of the closely related Sino-Himalayan species P. paleaceum (Mitt.) A. Jaeger, which differs in its slightly larger stature and broader, circular-ovate, concave-cochleariform leaves. The erect sporophytes of P. handelii and P. paleaceum are also very similar.

In the course of a recent phylogenetic study of Plagiothecium Bruch & Schimp. (Wynns et al. in press), the first author received several collections of a delicate, feltlike moss collected by the second author in Austria and identified by him as Plagiothecium cavifolium var. gracile Breidl. After comparison with several collections of P. handelii from Yunnan, China, including three syntypes, we identified the Austrian moss as the latter species. A herbarium study of global collections of Plagiothecium (Wynns 2015) uncovered additional specimens of P. handelii from Romania and the eastern United States.

Collections of Plagiothecium handelii from Austria and China were included in Wynns et al. s molecular study of the genus. Here, we performed phylogenetic analyses of combined nuclear ITS and plastid rpl16 intron DNA sequence data from 27 collections of Plagiothecium and related pleurocarpous mosses (Table 1), in order to establish the conspecificity of Chinese and Austrian populations of P. handelii, and to place the species in a phylogenetic framework.

Methods

For the DNA analyses we included 20 collections of Plagiothecium (sensu Zuo et al. 2011), six collections of other Plagiotheciaceae (Isopterygiopsis Z. Iwats. and Platydictya Berk.), and one collection of Fabronia pusilla Raddi, which was used as the outgroup (Table 1). DNA extraction, PCR amplification and DNA sequencing were performed with the protocol of Wynns et al. (in press). Sequence alignment was performed manually in MEGA4 (Tamura et al. 2007). Next, indel data were generated for each alignment in SeqState ver. 1.4.1 (Müller 2005) using simple indel coding (Simmons and Ochoterena 2000). A single data file including both nucleotide and indel data for each DNA region was assembled in NEXUS format and analyzed by maximum parsimony (branch-an d-bound search) in PAUP ver. 4.0.10b (Swofford 2002). A bootstrap (BS) analysis was also performed (2000 replicates) using branch-and-bound. A partition homogeneity test was performed (1000 branch-an d-bound replicates), This work is licensed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY) < http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/>. The license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. to confirm that the two data sets were congruent and appropriate for a combined analysis.

Figure 1.

Ortholimnobium handelii (Broth.) C. Schröck & J.T. Wynns. (A) (in oval) and (B) in situ, Austria. (C) Handel-Mazzetti 8314 (lectotype of Plagiothecium handelii Broth., S no. B160040). (D-I). Leaves: (D, E) Handel-Mazzetti 7817, Yunnan (syntype of P. handelii, S no. B160038); (F) Long 34930, Yunnan (E no. E00387864); (G) Vajda s.n., Transylvania, Romania (C no. C-M-9099); (H) Schröck 17477, Austria (C no. CP0010623); (I) Anderson 10524, Tennessee, USA (DUKE no. 78480); scale bar= 1 mm.

f01_01.jpg

In addition to the parsimony analysis, a Bayesian analysis was performed using the program MrBayes ver. 3.2 (Ronquist et al. 2012). The data were divided into four partitions, two of nucleotide sequence data (rpl16 and ITS) and two respective partitions of binary indel data. The partitions were unlinked and were allowed to evolve at different rates. Based on the Akaike information criterion and the results of the hierarchichal likelihood ratio tests, the program Modeltest ver. 3.06 (Posada and Crandall 1998), selected the K81uf+I+Г (Kimura 1981) model of DNA sequence evolution. However, this model is not implemented in MrBayes, so for the nucleotide data partitions we used the GTR+I+Г model (cf. Lecocq et al. 2013), which in fact had the best overall log likelihood score. For the indel data partitions the default model was used, a Г-shaped rate variation was assumed (Yang 1993), and the coding bias was set to variable. A Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analysis was then run for 11 000 000 generations under the default settings. The results of the Bayesian analysis including posterior probability (PP) support values were visualized as a 50%-compromise phylogram based on average branch lengths using the program TreeGraph 2.1.0-386 beta (Stover and Müller 2010).

Results

The rpl16 data set included 986 characters, of which 54 were indel characters. The ITS data set included 682 characters, of which 22 were indel characters. Thus, the molecular analyses included 1744 characters in total, of which 1668 were nucleotide characters and 76 were indel characters (4.4%); 1384 characters were constant, 153 were variable but not parsimony-informative and 207 were parsimony-informative (20.6% variable characters). The strict consensus of two equally-parsimonious trees of 550 steps was well-resolved, with consistency index (CI, Kluge and Farris 1969) = 0.735, CI excluding uninformative characters = 0.627, retention index = 0.790, and rescaled consistency index = 0.581 (Farris 1989). The 50%-compromise Bayesian tree (Fig. 2) was identical to the parsimony tree in topology, with an additional unsupported node. The results of the partition homogeneity test (p = 0.190) indicated that the plastid and nuclear data sets reflect the same underlying phylogeny.

Table 1.

Specimens used in the DNA study. Barcode numbers are for the herbaria where the specimens are housed. Herbarium acronyms are from Index Herbariorum (Thiers, continuously updated). The last two columns are GenBank accession numbers. *We lacked an ITS sequence for Ortholimnobium paleaceum, and substituted a consensus of two Chinese O. paleaceum ITS sequences from GenBank.

t01_01.gif

The two populations of Plagiothecium handelii formed a clade (BS = 79, PP = 0.88) that was sister to P. paleaceum (BS = 100; PP = 1). This clade was sister (BS = 100, PP = 1) to a Struckia Müll. Hal. sensu Ignatov et al. (2007) clade. The branches leading to these clades were relatively long (Fig. 2). All together, this early-diverging clade (Struckia sensu Huttunen et al. 2013) was intercalated between P. piliferum (Sw.) Schimp, and the rest of Plagiothecium.

The two populations of Plagiothecium handelii had some variation in both DNA regions (cf. Fig. 2). In ITS, the Chinese population had two autapomorphic transitions and four synapomorphic changes, while the Austrian population had a single synapomorphic transversion. In rpl16, the Chinese population had three autapomorphic changes (one transversion and two transitions) as well as three synapomorphic changes, while the Austrian population had a single autapomorphic transition. In the Chinese population, rpl16 included a variable 10–21 base pair insertion that was also present in P. laetum Schimp., P. draytonii (Sull.) E.B. Bartram, P. paleaceum, P. piliferum from Russia, Isopterygiopsis pulchella (Hedw.) Z. Iwats. and I. alpicola (Lindb.) Hedenäs (Table 1).

Discussion

When Brotherus (1929) described Plagiothecium handelii from Yunnan, he was not aware that the same plant had been recorded much earlier from the Alps by Lorentz (1860; 24), who described a delicate, distinctly flagelliform form of P. sylvaticum (Brid.) Schimp, growing in dark fissures, with narrow, almost knife-shaped leaves. Subsequently, Molendo (1865; 173) described P. sylvaticum var. laxum from Zwingsteg, Freiberg near Oberstdorf, Germany: “Forma cavernarum ut in omnibus analogis eximia longitudine axium et internodiorum; cespite laxissimo, e caulibus prostratis pro maxima parte flagelliformibus contexto.” Finally, Breidler (1892) described P. roeseanum var. gracile growing between boulders in Alpine woods and cited numerous Austrian localities. Plagiothecium handelii has concave leaves and microscopically could be taken for a small form of the polymorphic, circumboreal species P. cavifolium [= P. roeseanum Schimp., P. sylvaticum (Brid.) Schimp. pro parte]. This similarity is apparently the reason that P. handelii has been overlooked in Europe.

In Austria, Plagiothecium handelii colonizes humus-rich, cool and moist scree slopes in the montane belt dominated by spruce forests. It occurs in small cavities filled by humus under boulders (Fig. 1, A). The bedrock is mostly granite, gneiss or schist. Other plants found at these sites include ferns, Lycopodium annotinum L., Vaccinium myrtillus L., and bryophytes characteristic of montane boulder-rich forests such as Hylocomium splendens (Hedw.) Schimp., Plagiochila asplenioides (L.) Dumort., P. porelloides (Torr. ex Nees) Lindenb., Polytrichum formosum Hedw., P. longisetum Sw. ex Brid., Plagiothecium denticulatum (Hedw.) Schimp., P. succulentum (Wils.) Lindb., Rhytidiadelphus loreus (Hedw.) Warnst., R. subpinnatus (Lindb.) T.J. Kop., and R. triquetrus (Hedw.) Warnst. In contrast, P. neckeroideum Schimp., which also has a main distribution in Asia and occurs disjunctively in the Alps, grows in colder, more dynamic sites with larger boulders on the same mountainsides. Unlike P. neckeroideum, P. handelii also grows on (less acidic) shale, and thus the distribution of P. handelii in Europe is likely to be slightly wider.

Figure 2.

50%-compromise phylogram based on average branch lengths generated from a Bayesian analysis of of plastid rpl16 intron and nuclear ribosomal ITS data from 27 collections of hypnalean mosses (Table 1). Gaps were coded as separate characters, using simple indel coding (Simmons and Ochoterena 2000). For P. paleaceum, we lacked an ITS sequence and substituted a consensus of two sequences from a public database (GenBank). Posterior probability support values are indicated above the branches, and bootstrap support values (2000 branch-and-bound replicates) from the parsimony analysis are indicated below the branches. The consensus parsimony tree (not shown) lacked one node (indicated with *), but was otherwise identical in topology. The node without a bootstrap value near the bottom of the tree was present in the parsimony tree but not in the bootstrap tree.

f02_01.jpg

The sister relationship between the Chinese and Austrian populations of Plagiothecium handelii that was found in the molecular analyses (Fig. 2) corroborates their conspecificity. Although the populations from Romania and USA were not included in the molecular sampling, the unusual growth form of this species (felt-like mats of etiolated stems, cf. Fig. 1, A, B) is quite easy to recognize, so we have confidence in their identity. Plagiothecium handelii thus has an unusual distribution pattern. While there are several bryophytes that occur disjunctively between the Alps and the Sino-Himalayan region, including P. neckeroideum, Distichophyllum carinatum Dixon & W.E. Nicholson (Dixon and Nicholson 1909, Redfearn et al. 1994), Tayloria rudolphiana (Garov.) Bruch & Schimp. (Koponen 1992), and (possibly) Brotherella lorentziana (Molendo ex Lorentz) Loeske (Frahm 2013), none of these species occur disjunctively in the eastern USA. Similarly, some bryophytes occur disjunctively between the eastern USA and southwest China, for example Entodon macropodus (Hedw.) Müll. Hal. (Iwatsuki and Sharp 1967), Brothera leana (Sull.) Müll. Hal., Grimmia pilifera P. Beauv. and Acrobolbus ciliatus (Mitt.) Schiffn. (Iwatsuki 1972), but these species are not found in Europe. This suggests either the European or American populations of P. handelii may have arisen through long-distance dispersal (cf. Frahm 2013).

On the other hand, Plagiothecium handelii is a dioicous species that is seldom collected in fruit, reducing the likelihood of dispersal by spores. Furthermore, it is restricted to pristine habitats which apparently have a similar ecology at all of the stations. Also, the plants occur in discontinuous localities, both in Europe and America. Last, the relatively large genetic divergence (Fig. 2) between Austrian and Chinese collections is suggestive of a very old disjunction. These facts support a hypothesis that extant populations of P. handelii are relicts of a pre-Pleistocene flora that once had a much broader distribution (Steere 1937, Iwatsuki 1972, Schuster and Damsholt 1974, Manos and Stanford 2001, Hedenäs 2008, Patiño et al. 2016). We believe this explanation is more likely. Many authors (Herzog 1926, Müller 1954, Schuster 1983, Schönswerter et al. 2005, Damsholt 2013) suggest that certain small Alpine localities must have remained uncovered during the Pleistocene glaciations and thus served as refugia for older floras.

Phylogenetic position of Plagiothecium handelii

The sister relationship between Plagiothecium handelii and P. paleaceum was first identified by Zuo et al. (2011), as was the sister relationship between this lineage and Struckia. Huttunen et al. (2013) subsequently transferred P. handelii and P. paleaceum to Struckia. Wynns et al. (in press) found P. handelii and P. paleaceum morphologically closer to Plagiothecium than to Struckia, and like Zuo et al. they included Struckia in Plagiothecium.

Struckia sensu Ignatov et al. (2007) includes two species. Struckia argentata (Mitt.) Müll. Hal. is not uncommon on tree trunks in the Sino-Himalayan region, while S. enervis (Broth.) Ignatov, T.J. Kop. & D.G. Long occurs on rocks, and has a restricted distribution in boreal Asia with a disjunctive occurrence in southwest China (Tan et al. 1990, Hedenäs 1996). Struckia differs from Plagiothecium in several respects. In general, species of Plagiothecium are prostrate satiny mosses with spreading leaves, whereas both species of Struckia are small erect mosses with appressed leaves and a shaggy appearance (produced by the long-attenuate leaf tips). Microscopically, the leaves are hardly decurrent in Struckia, while this is a defining feature of Plagiothecium. Also unlike Plagiothecium, the leaves in Struckia have a large number of quadrate alar cells (reminiscent of Entodon Müll. Hal.). Struckia argentata further differs from Plagiothecium in its epiphytic habit, denticulate upper leaf margins, and shiny, small-mouthed capsules with conic-mammillate opercula. On the other hand, S. argentata resembles the sympatric species P. handelii and P. paleaceum in having short erect capsules and ovate-acuminate, concave, subplicate leaves that are often subtended by cells of the cortical hyalodermis when detached.

Struckia enervis is peculiar in that it forms erect defoliated shoots topped with clusters of shortly ligulate, costate gemmae (reduced leaves) (cf. Abramova and Abramov 1981). The specialized morphology of S. enervis promotes vegetative spread and probably arose with the transition away from the epiphytic habitat. It is presumably the more derived species of Struckia (Tan et al. 1990).

Paraphyletic taxa are the real result of evolution (Hörandl 2006) and should not automatically be rejected as the basis for names. In this case Plagiothecium would be rendered paraphyletic by retaining P. handelii and P. paleaceum but excluding Struckia as a distinct genus that evolved rapidly under adaptive pressures associated with a change to epiphyty. This is a plausible hypothesis that is consistent with the morphological and genetic (Fig. 2) differences between Plagiothecium and Struckia. However, this classification hides the close relationship between the P. handelii + P. paleaceum clade and Struckia. Morphologically P. handelii and P. paleaceum share features of both genera and are clearly a transitional taxon that can itself be treated as a distinct genus. The type of the genus Ortholimnobium Dixon belongs to P. paleaceum (Enroth et al. 1992), so this name is available.

Taxonomy

Ortholimnobium Dixon. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 39: 787. 1937.

Type species: O. borii Dixon. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 39: 788, pl. 1, f. 15. 1937. Type: INDIA. Assam, Aka Hills, Piri, 2300 m, 17 November 1934, N. L. Bor 252 (BM).

Plants glossy, pseudo-stipitate; branches more or less terete, with cortical hyalodermis; leaves imbricate to distant, symmetric, ovate-acuminate, concave, weakly plicate, decurrent, with short narrow cells; capsules short, erect.

Included species:

Ortholimnobium paleaceum (Mitt.) C. Schröck & J.T. Wynns, comb. nov. Basionym: Stereodon paleaceus Mitt. J. Proc. Linn. Soc., Botany, Suppl. 1: 103. 1859. Plagiothecium paleaceum (Mitt.) A. Jaeger. Bericht über die Thätigkeit der St. Gallischen Naturwissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft 1876– 77: 452 (Gen. Sp. Musc. 2: 518). 1878. Struckia paleacea (Mitt.) Hedenäs & Huttunen. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 171(2): 344. 2013.

Lectotype (designated by Enroth et al. 1992). CHINA, Thibet, Yatsen tebo, 17000 ft., J. D. Hooker 1075, ex herb. Mitten (NY no. 00913410).

Syntypes: INDIA. Himalaya, Sikkim, Tonglo, 7–—8000 ft., Hooker 1006, ex herb. Mitten (NY nos. 00913411, 00913412!), Singalehah, 11000 ft., Hooker 1007 (NY nos. 00913413, 00913414, P no. PC0132613).

Enroth et al. (1992) reported that the lectotype specimen was probably collected by T. Thomsen, not J. D. Hooker. Here we have simply followed the information given by Mitten (1859), which corresponds with the label data.

Additional specimens examined: CHINA. Yunnan, Yangbi Co., vic. Dajiuping, on shaded boulder in ravine in mixed broadleaf-evergreen forest, 25.50°N, 99.59°E, 2800 m, 1 July 2004, P. L. Redfearn & Y.-G. Su 950 (ex SMS, DUKE no. 0156745, NY no. 1596230). INDIA. NO-Indien, Darjeeling, Tiger Hill, an Felsen, 2800 m, 18 March 1909, M. Fleischer B 3270 p.p. (ex B, DUKE no. 0156913), Sikkim, West Distr., Rathong Chhu Valley, on mossy boulder in Quercus lamellosa forest, 27°24′N, 88°12′E, ca. 2315 m, 8 July 1992, D. G. Long 22443 (E no. E00387897). NEPAL. Sankhuwasabha Distr., E bank of Sal dim Khola, near bridge, on bank under stump in mossy Tsuga forest, 27°46′N, 87°16′E, ca. 2920 m, 12 Oct 1991, D. G. Long 21152 (E no. E00387890).

Ortholimnobium handelii (Broth.) C. Schröck & J.T. Wynns, comb. nov. Basionym: Plagiothecium handelii Broth. Symbolae Sinicae 4: 115. 1929. Struckia handelii (Broth.) Huttunen & Hedenäs. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 171(2): 344. 2013.

Lectotype (designated here): CHINA. NW Yunnan, Am Wegrand auf Schiefer im tp. Regenwalde des Doyon-lumba am Salwin, 28°2′, 3150 m, 23 Sep 1915, c. fr., Diar. Nr. 1536, H. F. von Handel-Mazzetti 8314 (S no. B160040!, isolectotypes H no. H3112713, P no. PCO 132634).

Syntypes: CHINA. NW Yunnan, In Tannenwäldern auf dem Nguka-la sw von Dschungdien (“Chungtien”) auf Diabas, 3750–3800 m, 25 Aug 1915, Diar. Nr. 1429, Handel-Mazzetti 7817 (E no. E00049113!, H no. H3112711, P no. PC0132633, S nos. B160036!, B160038!, US no. 00070394), In Tannenwäldern der ktp. St. unter dem Doker-la an der tibetischen Grenze auf Granit, 28°15′N, 3800–4100 m, 17 Sep 1915, c. fr., Diar. Nr. 1502, Handel-Mazzetti 8101 (H no. 3112712), An granit in der str. St. des birm. Mons. in der Seitenschlucht Naiwanglong des Djiou-djiang (e Irrawadi-Oberlaufes), 27°53′N, 2130 m, 5 July 1916, Diar. Nr. 1768, Handel-Mazzetti 9339 (H no. 3112714).

= Plagiothecium roeseanum var. gracile Breidl. Mitteilungen der Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereines für Steiermark 28: 195. 1891. Plagiothecium roeseanum fo. gracile (Breidl.) Jedl. Spisy Vydávané Přírodovfi01_01.gifdeckou Fakultou Masarykovy University 308: 37. 1948.

Lectotype (designated here): AUSTRIA. Steiermark, bei Schladming, Wald am Rissachfall [Riesachfall], 1080 m, 30 July 1876, sub P. denticulatum, P. roeseanum var. gracile (GJO 0071175!).

Syntypes (all leg. and det. J. Breidler as P. roeseanum var. gracile): AUSTRIA. Salzburg, Pinzgau, 12–1500 m, Wald am Krimmler Fall, 1879, sub P. denticulatum (GJO 0071166!), Felstrümmerwerk im Walde in der Ammerthaler Öd n. Mittersill, 1879, sub P. denticulatum (GJO 0071164!), Steiermark, bei Schladming, Wald unterhalb der Ursprungalm im Preuneggthal, 1880 (GJO 0071157!), ca. 1300 m, 7 Aug 1876, sub P. denticulatum (GJO 0071174!), Unterthal, 1870, sub P. sylvaticum (GJO 0071171!), Felstrümmer beim Kreutzsteg [Kreuzsteg südlich Bräualm] b. St. Nikolai in der Sölk, 1200 m, 1883, sub P. roeseanum var. tenellum (GJO 0071176!), Seewieggraben bei Aich, 8–900 m, 1888, sub P. roeseanum var. tenellum (GJO 0071172!).

=? Plagiothecium sylvaticum var. laxum Molendo. Bericht des Naturhistorischen Vereins in Augsburg 18: 173. 1865.

Syntypes: GERMANY. Algäu, in Sandsteinklüften beim Zwingsteg 3100′ nw. und am Freiberge 2800′ nö, leg. Molendo [?].

Plants bright green, delicate, pseudo-stipitate, in loose trailing felt-like mats over rock or humus. Rhizoids fasciculate, smooth, reddish-brown. Stems with cortical hyalodermis, often etiolated and threadlike with leaves poorly developed, or appearing thickened by small clasping leaves; branches frequent, somewhat flattened. Leaves distant, or somewhat overlapping, 1-1.4 × 0.35-0.65 mm, concave, erect-spreading, twisted when dry, shortly ovate- to oblong-lanceolate, weakly striate, acuminate with slender tip, clasping at base, decurrent; leaf margins entire, erect toward base; median leaf cells narrow, (75)85-125 × 7.5-10 µm; basal cells sometimes brownish; decurrent cells inflated, ovoid-rectangular, irregularly thick-walled, flanking thin-walled rectangular stem cortical cells that detach with leaves. Dioicous [fide Brotherus 1929]. Seta orangish- or reddish-brown. Capsules erect or slightly inclined, cylindric, slightly constricted below mouth, not or weakly furrowed when dry, ca 1 mm long without lid. Operculum shortly rostrate. Annulus present.

Additional specimens examined (in herb. Schröck where not otherwise indicated): AUSTRIA. Kärnten, Gössgraben, Kärnthen, leg. J. Breidler, 1880, sub P. roeseanum var. tenellum, P. roeseanum var. gracile (GJO 0071168), Ritteralpbachfall, leg. J. Glowacki, 1903, sub P. roeseanum var. gracile (GJO 0071152), Niederösterreich, Aspanger Klause, 1882, leg. K. Fehlner, sub P. nitidulum (GJO 0071165), Salzburg, Pinzgau, Hohe Tauern, Venediger-Gruppe, Krimmler Wasserfälle, 1999, C. Schröck 2456, Habachtal, Blockwerk, Humus, 47.19°N, 12.35°E, ca 1360–1500 m, 2000, C. Schröck 9209, 9375, Untersulzbachtal, 2001, C. Schröck 10944, 14499, 14502, 14503, 14504, 2014, C. Schröck s.n., Goldberg-Gruppe, Seidlwinkltal, 1999, C. Schröck 2637, 4258, Granatspitz-Gruppe, Stubachtal, Ödbachtal, Blockwerk, Spalten, Gneis, 47.20°N, 12.59°E, ca 1050 m, 25 Aug 2000, C. Schröck 7902, Dörfer Öd, Blockwerk, Gneis, 47.18°N, 12.58°E, ca 1300–1400 m, 25 Aug 2000, C. Schröck 7921 (NY no. 02467330), Ammerthaler Öd, Felstrümmerwerk im Walde, 1879, leg. J. Breidler, sub P. denticulatum, P. roeseanum var. tenellum (GJO 0071163), Zillertaler Alpen, Wildgerlostal, 2001, C. Schröck 14500, Steiermark, Preuneggthal bei Schladming, Wald unterhalb der Ursprungalm, 1880, leg. J. Breidler, sub P. roeseanum var. tenellum (GJO 0071173), Ostabdachung des Knallstein in der Sölk, 2100 m, 1884, leg. J. Breidler, sub P. roeseanum fo. erecta (GJO 0071156), Vorarlberg, Montafon, NW-hang, Fichtenwald, Blockwerk, Silikat, 46.96°N, 10.08°E, ca 1372 m, 10 Aug 2010, C. Schröck 17477 (C no. CP0010623), Allgäuer Alpen, Kleinwalsertal, valley of the Wildenbach, 2011, C. Schröck 20284. CHINA: Yunnan Prov., Pe yen tsin, 3000 m, 1922, S. Ten s.n., sub P. paleaceum var. laxirete Dix. (S no. B192147), Fugong Co., E slope of Gaoligong Shan (Nu Jiang catchment), in mossy litter under bamboo, 27°03′4.6″N, 98°45′10.7″E, 3190 m, 13 Aug 2005, D. G. Long 34719 (E no. E00387866), N bank of North Fork Yamu River, between Shibali and Yaping Pass, steep hillside with dense Abies-Rhododendron-bamboo forest, on rotten stump, 27°12′03.4″N, 98°42′48.3″E, 3230 m, 17 Aug 2005, D. G. Long 34930 (E no. E00387864). ROMANIA: Transylvania, montes Biharhegység, in rupibus umbrosis vallis Drágánvölgy pr. pag. Poieni, L. Vajda s.n., 6 July 1963, sub P. roeseanum fo. tenue Jedl. (C no. C-M-9099). UNITED STATES: Tennessee, Roane Co., Cumberland Plateau, Rockwood, Mammys Creek, on peaty soil, 1500 ft., 6 Oct 1929, A. J. Sharp 36, sub P. roeseanum, ex hb. Grout (DUKE no. 78475), Sevier Co., Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Clingmans Dome, on humus of forest floor, 21 July 1959, L. E. Anderson 10524, sub P. cavifolium (DUKE no. 78480).

Variation

In general Ortholimnobium handelii is quite stenotypic. However, a form with wider cells occurs at high elevations. We noticed this both in Austrian (Breidler s.n., 2100 m, GJO 0071156) and American (Anderson 10524, ca 2000 m, DUKE no. 78480) populations. Occasional collections of most species of Plagiothecium s.l. have a laxer leaf areolation, perhaps in response to environmental factors.

Conservation

In Austria, Ortholimnobium handelii is apparently rare to scattered in mountainous areas with siliceous bedrock. It has a wider distribution than the sympatric Plagiothecium neckeroideum, which is rare or absent in the western Alps. Most populations of O. handelii are not currently threatened, but the complex local climate of scree slopes can certainly be disturbed by road construction and logging. Although numerical population data are missing, O. handelii can be categorized as VU D1 (Vulnerable) under current IUCN criteria, on the basis of small population sizes. Now that O. handelii is known to occur in Europe, future floristic studies should improve our knowledge of the frequency and distribution of this species.

Acknowledgements

We thank Kell Damsholt and Ken McFarland for providing information on bryophyte geography, and Conny Asmussen Lange, who supervised the first authors PhD study in which the DNA sequence data were obtained. We also thank Derick Poindexter for helpful suggestions to improve the manuscript.

References

  1. Abramova, A. L. and Abramov, I. I. 1981. De muscis endemicis URSS. 1. Cephalocladium zerovii Lazar. — Novosti Sist. Nizsh. Rast. 18: 179–187. Google Scholar
  2. Breidler, J. 1892. Die Laubmoose Steiermarks und ihre Verbreitung. — Mitt. Naturwiss. Vereines Steiermark 28: 3–234. Google Scholar
  3. Brotherus, V. F. 1929. Musci. Symbolae Sinicae 4. — J. Springer. Google Scholar
  4. Damsholt, K. 2013. The liverworts of Greenland. — Nordic Bryological Society. Google Scholar
  5. Dixon, H. N. and Nicholson, W. E. 1909. Distichophyllum carinatum Dixon et Nicholson, a species and genus of mosses new to Europe. — Rev. Bryol. 36: 21–26. Google Scholar
  6. Enroth, J., Koponen, T. and Li, X.-J. 1992. Contributions to the bryoflora of China 1. Taxonomic status of Ortholimnobium. — Ann. Bot. Fenn. 29: 315–318. Google Scholar
  7. Farris, J. S. 1989. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. — Cladistics 5: 417–419. Google Scholar
  8. Frahm, J. P. 2013. Are there endemic bryophyte species in the Alps? — The range of Brotherella lorentziana (Lor.) Loeske. — Arch. Bryol. 183: 1–7. Google Scholar
  9. Hedenäs, L. 1996. On the taxonomic position of Struckia C. Müll. — J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 80: 241–245. Google Scholar
  10. Hedenäs, L. 2008. Molecular variation and speciation in Antitrichia curtipendula s.l. (Leucodontaceae, Bryophyta). — Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 156: 341–354. Google Scholar
  11. Herzog, T. 1926. Geographie der Moose. — Gustav Fischer. Google Scholar
  12. Hörandl, E. 2006. Paraphyleric versus monophyletic taxa— evolutionary versus cladistic classification.— Taxon 55: 564–570. Google Scholar
  13. Huttunen, S., Ignatov, M. S., Quandt, D. et al. 2013. Phylogenetic position and delimitation of the moss family Plagiotheciaceae in the order Hypnales. — Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 171: 330–353. Google Scholar
  14. Ignatov, M. S., Milyutina, I. A., Koponen, T. et al. 2007. Taxonomy of Struckia (Plagiotheciaceae, Bryophyta) based on morphological and molecular data. Chenia — 9: 117–125. Google Scholar
  15. Iwatsuki, Z. 1972. Distribution of bryophytes common to Japan and the United States — In: Graham, A. (ed.), Floristics and Paleofloristics of Asia and eastern North America. — Elsevier. Google Scholar
  16. Iwatsuki, Z. and Sharp, A. J. 1967. The bryogeographical relationships between eastern Asia and North America. — J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 30: 152–170. Google Scholar
  17. Kimura, M. 1981. Estimation of evolutionary distances between homologous nucleotide sequences. — Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78: 454–458. Google Scholar
  18. Kluge, A. G. and Farris, J. S. 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. — Syst. Zool. 18: 1–32. Google Scholar
  19. Koponen, A. 1992. European—Asiatic connections in Tayloria (Splachnaceae, Musci). Bryobrothera — 1: 57–62. Google Scholar
  20. Lecocq, T., Vereecken, N. J., Michez, D. et al. 2013. Pattens of genetic and reproductive traits differentiation in mainland vs Corsican populations of bumblebees. PloS One — 8(6): e65642. Google Scholar
  21. Lorentz, P. G. 1860. Beiträge zur Biologie und Geographie der Laubmoose. — PhD thesis, Univ. of Munich. Google Scholar
  22. Manos, P. S. and Stanford, A. M. 2001. The historical biogeography of Fagaceae: tracking the Tertiary history of temperate and subtropical forests in the Northern Hemisphere. — Int. J. Plant Sci. 162(6 suppl.): S77–S93. Google Scholar
  23. Mitten, W. 1859. Musci Indiae Orientalis, an enumeration of the mosses of the East Indies. — J. Proc. Linn. Soc., Bot., suppl. 1: 1–171. Google Scholar
  24. Molendo, L. 1865. Moos-Studien aus den Allgäuer Alpen. Beiträge zur Phytogeographie. — Ber. Naturhist. Vereins Augsburg 18: 77–240. Google Scholar
  25. Müller, Kai 2005. SeqState — primer design and sequence statistics for phylogenetic DNA data sets. — Appl. Bioinf. 4: 65–69. Google Scholar
  26. Müller, Karl 1954. Die Lebermoose. — In: Dr. L. Rabenhorst's Kryptogamen-Flora von Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz, VI. Band, 1. Abtlg., 3. Auflage. — Geest & Portig. Google Scholar
  27. Patiño, J., Goffinet, B., Sim-Sim, M. and Vanderpoorten, A. 2016. Is the sword moss (Bryoxiphium) a preglacial Tertiary relict? — Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 96: 200–206. Google Scholar
  28. Posada, D. and Crandall, K. A. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. — Bio informatics 14: 817–818. Google Scholar
  29. Redfearn, P. L., Jr ., Allen, B. and He, S. 1994. New distributional records for Chinese mosses. — Bryologist 97: 275–276. Google Scholar
  30. Ronquist, F., Teslenko, M., van der Mark, P et al. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. — Syst. Biol. 61: 539–542. Google Scholar
  31. Schuster, R. M. 1983. Phytogeography of the Bryophyta. — In: Schuster, R. M. (ed.), New manual of Bryology, vol. 1. — Hattori Bot. Lab. Google Scholar
  32. Schuster, R. M. and Damsholt, K. 1974. The Hepaticae of West Greenland from ca 66°N to 72°N. — Meddel. Grønland 199: 1–373. Google Scholar
  33. Schönswetter, P., Stehlik, I., Holderegger, R. et al. 2005. Molecular evidence for glacial refugia of mountain plants in the European Alps. — Mol. Ecol. 14: 3547–3555. Google Scholar
  34. Simmons, M. P. and Ochoterena, H. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. — Syst. Biol. 49: 369–381. Google Scholar
  35. Steere, W. C. 1937. Bryoxiphium norvegicum, the sword moss, as a preglacial and interglacial relict. — Ecology 18: 346–358. Google Scholar
  36. Stöver, B. C. and Müller, K. F. 2010. TreeGraph2: combining and visualizing evidence from different phylogenetic analyses. — BMC Bioinf. 11: 7. Google Scholar
  37. Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP* — Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods) version 4.0.10b. — Sinauer. Google Scholar
  38. Tamura, K., Dudley, J., Nei, M. et al. 2007. MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software ver. 4.0. — Mol. Biol. Evol. 24: 1596–1599. Google Scholar
  39. Tan, B. C., Buck, W. R. and Ignatov, M. S. 1990. On the Himalayan Struckia C. Muell. and the Russian Cephalocladium Lazar. (Musci, Hypnaceae). — Lindbergia 16: 100–104. Google Scholar
  40. Thiers, B. [continuously updated]. Index Herbariorum: A global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden's Virtual Herbarium. < www.sweetgum.nybg.org/science/ih/> accessed 15 September 2017. Google Scholar
  41. Wynns, J. T. 2015. Molecular phylogeny and systematic revision of the pleurocarpous moss genus Plagiothecium. — PhD thesis, Univ. of Copenhagen. Google Scholar
  42. Wynns, J. T., Munk, K. R. and Lange, C. B. A. Molecular phylogeny of Plagiothecium and similar hypnalean mosses, with a revised sectional classification of Plagiothecium. — Cladistics https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12210Google Scholar
  43. Yang, Z. 1993. Maximum likelihood estimation of phylogeny from DNA sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. — Mol. Biol. Evol. 10: 1396–1401. Google Scholar
  44. Zuo Q., Higuchi, M., Wang, Y.-F. et al. 2011. The status of Struckia Müll. Hal. (Plagiotheciaceae, Bryopsida) inferred from multiple nuclear and chloroplast loci. — J. Bryol. 33: 221–228. Google Scholar
© 2018 The Authors. This is an Open Access article This work is licensed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY) < http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ >. The license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Justin T. Wynns and Christian Schröck "Range extensions for the rare moss Plagiothecium handelii, and its transfer to the resurrected genus Ortholimnobium," Lindbergia 41(1), (1 February 2018). https://doi.org/10.25227/linbg.01087
JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top