Open Access
Rachael L. Olliff-Yang, Jenn M. Yost
Author Affiliations +

If there were ever a time to study plant phenology, the time is now. Change is upon us in every regard and as a Society focused on the natural history of the flora of western North America, this special issue is focused on understanding the phenological responses of plants in our region. Western North America contains a diverse and highly endemic flora (Burge et al. 2016) that is also highly endangered. There are many threats to the flora, including rapid land use changes and anthropogenic climate change, which pose a heightened threat to California's endemic flora and beyond. Rising temperatures, predicted by climate models, are being observed in the West (Parmesan and Yohe 2003; Kelly and Goulden 2008), and precipitation patterns are becoming more variable (Swain et al. 2018). These changes are already impacting plants in this region, as shown in many of the articles presented here. Understanding how plant species, populations, and communities change over time and across space is critical to directing conservation efforts, land management, and future scientific inquiry.

Plant phenology—or the timing of life history events, such as bud break or flowering—is a critical component of an organism's biology, and links it to a myriad of other interacting organisms (such as Olliff-Yang and Mesler 2018; Mulder et al. 2021 this issue). What triggers plant phenological responses is a fundamental question of organismal biology and ecology, yet for most species, this remains a mystery. Recent advances in available data have made studying phenology of plants much more feasible, and we are pleased to have brought together a group of articles that advance our knowledge of the phenological patterns of our flora (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Examples of plants included in this Special Issue on phenology, in order of appearance. (A) Eschscholzia californica, photo: Katelin Pearson; (B) Calochortus plummerae, photo: Kimberlyn Williams; (C) Lasthenia gracilis, photo: Emily Cox; (D) Lasthenia californica, photo: Alexander C. Yang; (E) Clarkia unguiculata, photo: Susan Mazer; (F) Bodega congeners Camissoniopsis cheiranthifolia (top) and C. micrantha (bottom), photos: Sharon Strauss and Keir Morse (respectively); (G) Dirca occidentalis, photo: William R. Graves; (H) Quercus douglasii, photo: Prahlad Papper; (I) Quercus lobata, photo: Walt Koenig; (J) Quercus kelloggii, photo: Wendy Armstrong-Herniman; (K) Arctostaphylos andersonii, photo: Tom Parker; (L) Ceanothus cuneatus, photo: Tom Parker; (M) Fouquieria splendens, photo: Rhonda Spencer; (N) Olneya tesota, photo: Mark Dimmitt; (O) Empetrum nigrum, photo: Anne Ruggles; (P) Vaccinium vitis-idaea, photo: Anne Ruggles.


At its core, phenological research asks a basic question about an organism: “What environmental factors (e.g., temperature or precipitation) induce changes in the timing of a life history event (e.g., leaf drop, bud burst, flowering, fruiting, or senescence)?” The availability of climate data for the entire United States via Climate NA and PRISM provides many environmental variables with which to look for correlations with the phenological trait of interest (PRISM Climate Group 2004; Wang et al. 2016). Phenological data has traditionally come from in situ observations of plants in the field. However, to understand plant responses to in situ environmental conditions, observations must span many years, making these datasets rare. In this issue you will see the results of a 5-yr study of Dirca occidentalis (Graves and Gimondo 2021 this issue), a 10-yr study of Calochortus plummerae (Williams et al. 2021 this issue), a 30-yr dataset for six desert taxa (Zachmann et al. 2021 this issue), and a 30-yr study in Quercus (Koenig et al. 2021 this issue). Common gardens are also incredibly valuable for understanding how plants from different populations vary with respect to phenological responses. Two papers featured here present results from 30-yr old common gardens in Quercus (Papper and Ackerly 2021 this issue; Wright et al. 2021 this issue). These long-term projects require sustained effort over long time periods, and we are excited to present their findings in this issue.

A more recent way to generate phenological data is to engage the public in the process of making in situ observations of plants. The National Phenology Network empowers people to make phenological observations of species in the field and, as a network, volunteers currently monitor over 1,000 plant species with data going back to the early 2000's (USA National Phenology Network 2021). These are recorded and aggregated for research use. Armstrong-Herniman and Greenwood (2021 this issue) use these data to understand the flowering phenology of five oak species. Other networks, like the Winterberry Network in Alaska, provide data on fruit availability during the harsh winters of northern regions (Mulder et al. 2021 this issue). These crowd-sourcing approaches provide robust datasets to answer questions on larger spatial scales.

Herbarium specimens preserve phenological data of plants across time and space. Although most herbarium specimens were not generally collected with the purpose of conducting phenological research, the phenological status of a specimen can be seen by visually inspecting the specimen. The use of herbarium specimens to track the relationship between local climatic conditions and the collection dates of flowering specimens has a relatively short history (Willis et al. 2017). Nevertheless, herbarium-based phenological studies are dramatically increasing the temporal scale of phenological research.

The consortium of California Herbaria has a robust record of curating the state's herbarium specimens and currently specimens are being imaged as part of the California Phenology Thematic Collections Network (Yost et al. 2019;; NSF Project #1802163). Phenological status is being recorded on each of these images. As of 2021, there are now over 1.3 million phenological records in the data portal, which are available for research use. These records will dramatically increase phenological research by creating a historical record going back to the 1800's. Here, we present two papers that use phenological data from herbarium specimens. Mazer et al. (2021 this issue) used herbarium records spanning the last 115 yr for Clarkia species. Pearson et al. (2021 this issue) uses the historical record to study how California's state flower, Eschscholzia californica, is responding across its range.

The variation observed in these papers and others clearly indicates that generalizations about shifts in phenology due to climatic changes are too early at this point. In this issue, Zachmann et al. (2021 this issue) find that for some desert taxa, warming promotes earlier flowering, yet individual species still varied in their response to several climate variables. Williams et al. (2021 this issue) find that for a rare geophyte, rainfall and time since fire, were most correlated with flowering. Armstrong-Herniman and Greenwood (2021 this issue) find that winter rainfall drives budburst in five long lived perennial tree species (Quercus spp.). Yet for one of the same species, Quercus lobata, warming temperatures were shown to advance flowering times (Koenig et al. 2021 this issue). For two other woody perennials, Ceanothus and Arctostaphylos, there was no evidence for an advance in flowering time over that last century (Parker 2021 this issue). For the winter flowering species Dirca occidentalis, fall rainfall and fall and winter temperatures drove flowering (Graves and Gimondo 2021 this issue). Water availably drove the intensity and duration of flowering of Lasthenia gracilis, a spring annual (Cox and Olliff-Yang 2021 this issue). In a second paper on Lasthenia, we find that germination date and competition from neighboring plants are important predictors of the flowering season of L. californica (Olliff-Yang and Ackerly 2021 this issue). In Eschscholzia californica, long term temperatures were more important than long term precipitation in predicting flowering time (Pearson et al. 2021 this issue). Plants may also exhibit a plastic response to flowering, whereby changes in the environment can be tolerated to a certain extent. We show here that responses are variable among close relatives, as Mazer et al. (2021 this issue) found in Clarkia and Strauss et al. (2021 this issue) found across a wide variety of taxa in a community context in Bodega Bay, California. We also see variation in phenological responses within populations of the same species, as in the Blue Oak (Papper and Ackerly 2021 this issue), and California Poppy (Pearson et al. 2021 this issue). Given this variation, future predictions across ecosystems are difficult to make at this time. More widely available data for a larger number of taxa and across more temporal and geographic scales will help to illuminate general trends, if there are any.

As more phenological studies are conducted, we can begin to make comparisons across taxonomic groups and across climates. Many papers in this issue are focused on plants in the Mediterranean climate of western California. These responses can be contrasted with responses from the far north (Alaska – Mulder et al. 2021 this issue) to those of the southwest (Sonoran Desert – Zachmann et al. 2021 this issue).

There has been extensive work done on phenology across the world, but we are still just beginning to understand the complexity of timing that can occur within and between species, across landscapes and in different ecological contexts. This understanding is essential as climate change continues to alter the environmental cues that plants are responding to, and many species may need to shift rapidly to track optimal conditions.

Regardless of the drivers of a phenological event, the timing of plant resources—such as nectar, pollen, and fruit—strongly influence interacting organisms. For example, in this issue we see that when the fall season is extended and fruit ripen earlier, food resources in the winter and spring will be lower (Mulder et al. 2021 this issue). Environmental variables influence flowering season duration (Cox and Olliff-Yang 2021 this issue; Olliff-Yang and Ackerly 2021 this issue) and determine the conditions when flowers may be available for pollination (Graves and Gimondo 2021 this issue), which can result in higher or lower overlap in time with active pollinator species. Additionally, differences in timing between species and across habitats will have consequences for pollination and competition (Mazer et al. 2021 this issue; Strauss et al. 2021 this issue). For these reasons, shifts in phenology with climate change may have cascading effects within ecosystems, and will be important to continue to track.

In this issue, fourteen works are presented, covering a wide array of taxa representative of a small slice of our extremely diverse flora (Fig. 1). These manuscripts include historical, observational, and experimental studies of the timing of various plant stages, from leaf out and flowering to fruit set. Many authors from across western North America and beyond contributed manuscripts for this issue, and we are pleased to present a collection of papers spanning a diverse set of species.

Literature Cited


Armstrong-Herniman, W. and S. Greenwood. 2021. The role of winter precipitation as a climatic driver of the spring phenology of five California Quercus species (Fagaceae). Madroño 68: 450–460. Google Scholar


Burge, D. O., J. H. Thorne, S. P. Harrison, B. C. O'brien, J. P. Rebman, J. R. Shevock, E. R. Alverson, L. K. Hardison, J. D. Rodríguez, S. A. Junak, T. A. Oberbauer, H. Riemann, S. E. Vanderplank, and T. Barry. 2016. Plant diversity and endemism in the California Floristic Province. Madroño 63:3–206. Google Scholar


Cox, E. T. and R. L. Olliff-Yang. 2021. Growth responses of Lasthenia gracilis to simulated drought over a geographic gradient. Madroño 68:366–376. Google Scholar


Graves, W. R. and A. Gimondo. 2021. Phenology of annual dormancy release and its association with fruit set of Dirca occidentalis (Thymelaeaceae). Madroño 68: 416–424. Google Scholar


Kelly, A. E. and M. L. Goulden. 2008. Rapid shifts in plant distribution with recent climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 105:11823–11826. Google Scholar


Koenig, W. D., M. B. Pesendorfer, I. S. Pearse, W. J. Carmen, and J. M. H. Knops. 2021. Budburst timing of Valley Oaks at Hastings Reservation, central coastal California. Madroño 68: 434–442. Google Scholar


Mazer, S. J., N. R. Love, I. W. Park, T. Ramirez-Parada, and E. R. Matthews. 2021. Phenological sensitivities to climate are similar in two Clarkia congeners: indirect evidence for facilitation, convergence, niche conservatism, or genetic constraints. Madroño 68:388–405. Google Scholar


Mulder, C. P. H., K. V. Spellman, and J. Shaw. 2021. Berries in winter: a natural history of fruit retention in four species across Alaska. Madroño 68: 487–510. Google Scholar


Olliff-Yang, R. L. and D. D. Ackerly. 2021. Late planting shortens the flowering period and reduces fecundity in Lasthenia californica. Madroño 68:377–387. Google Scholar


Olliff-Yang R.L., M. R. Mesler. 2018. The potential for phenological mismatch between a perennial herb and its ground-nesting bee pollinator. AoB Plants 10:ply040. Google Scholar


Papper, P. D. and D. D. Ackerly. 2021. Partitioning genetic and environmental components of phenological variation in Quercus douglasii (Fagaceae). Madroño 68:425–433. Google Scholar


Parker. V. T. 2021. Absence of flowering shifts in Arctostaphylos and Ceanothus over the past century of climate warming. Madroño 68: 461–472. Google Scholar


Parmesan, C. and G. Yohe. 2003. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42. Google Scholar


Pearson, K. D., N. R. Love, T. Ramirez-Parada, S. J. Mazer, and J. M. Yost. Phenological trends in the California Poppy (Eschscholzia californica): digitized herbarium specimens reveal intraspecific variation in the sensitivity of flowering date to climate change. Madroño 68:343–359. Google Scholar


PRISM Climate Group. 2004. Oregon State University. Website [created 4 Feb 2004]. Google Scholar


Strauss, S. Y., A. M. Truszczinski, and B. L. Anacker. 2021. Do habitat shifts alter flowering phenology overlap in close relatives? Implications for local coexistence. Madroño 68:406–415. Google Scholar


Swain, D. L., B. Langenbrunner, J. D. Neelin, and A. Hall. 2018. Increasing precipitation volatility in twenty-first-century California. Nature Climate Change 8:427–433. Google Scholar


USA National Phenology Network. 2021. Plant and animal phenology data. USA-NPN, Tucson, Arizona. Website [accessed 04 November 2021]. Google Scholar


Wang, T., A. Hamann, D. Spittlehouse, and C. Carroll. 2016. Locally downscaled and spatially customizable climate data for historical and future periods for North America. PLoS ONE 11:e0156720. Google Scholar


Williams, K., E. Burck, and C. L. Garcia. 2021. Causes and correlates of interannual variation in flowering of Calochortus plummerae (Liliaceae). Madroño 68:360–365. Google Scholar


Willis, C. W., E. R. Ellwood, R. B. Primack, C. C. Davis, K. D. Pearson, A. S. Gallinat, J. M. Yost, G. Nelson, S. J. Mazer, N. L. Rossington, T. H. Sparks, and P. S. Soltis. 2017. Old plants, new tricks: phenological research using herbarium specimens. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 32:531–546. Google Scholar


Wright, J. W., C. T. Ivey, C. Canning, and V. L. Sork. 2021.Timing of bud burst is associated with climate of maternal origin in Quercus lobata progeny in a common garden. Madroño 68:443–449. Google Scholar


Yost et al. 2019. The California phenology collections network: using digital images to investigate phenological change in a biodiversity hotspot. Madroño 66:130–141. Google Scholar


Zachmann, L., J. F. Wiens, K. Franklin, S. D. Crausbay, V. A. Landau, and S. M. Munson. Dominant Sonoran Desert plant species have divergent phenological responses to climate change. Madroño 68:473–486. Google Scholar
Rachael L. Olliff-Yang and Jenn M. Yost "INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIAL ISSUE ON PHENOLOGICAL PATTERNS IN THE FLORA OF WESTERN NORTH AMERICA," Madroño 68(4), 339-342, (23 December 2021).
Published: 23 December 2021
Back to Top