Translator Disclaimer
9 October 2008 Pantholops Hodgsonii (Artiodactyla: Bovidae)
Author Affiliations +

Pantholops hodgsonii (Abel, 1826) is a bovid commonly called the chiru or Tibetan antelope. Pantholops is monotypic. This species inhabits high-elevation alpine and desert steppe with flat to rolling terrain in the Tibetan Plateau and only recently has been studied in any detail. At least 5 populations of P. hodgsonii are migratory, some moving up to 300–400 km; others are nonmigratory. This species is endangered because of exploitation and competition with domestic livestock of pastoralists; extant populations probably number about 100,000. It is virtually unknown in zoos, but young have been born and orphans have been reared successfully in a 200-ha fenced enclosure in native habitat.

Synonymies completed 14 April 2008

  • Pantholops Hodgson, 1834

  • Antelope Abel, 1826:234. Incorrect subsequent spelling of, but not Antilope Pallas, 1766.

  • Oryx Hamilton-Smith, 1827:196. Part; used as a subgenus of Antilope Pallas, 1766.

  • Pantholops Hodgson, 1834:81. Part; proposed as a subgenus of Antilope Pallas, 1766; type species Antilope hodgsonii Abel, 1826, by monotypy.

  • Pantholops: Hodgson, 1838:153. First use as a genus.

  • Kemas: Gray, 1843:157. Not Kemas Ogilby, 1837.

  • Pantolops Stein-Nordheim, 1884:109. Incorrect subsequent spelling of Pantholops Hodgson, 1834.

  • Context and Content. Order Artiodactyla, suborder Ruminantia, family Bovidae, subfamily Caprinae, tribe variously Pantholopini or Saigini. Pantholops is monotypic. Hodgson (1834) aligned P. hodgsonii with the “Antilopine” and “Gazelline” groups, but Gray (1872) created a new family, Pantholopidae, because of its “peculiarities” (Pocock 1910:899). Current molecular and morphological studies align P. hodgsonii most closely with Caprinae (e.g., Gatsey et al. 1997; Gentry 1992), although some contend that additional genetic resolution needs to be achieved (Lei et al. 2003; Schaller and Amato 1998). Based on behavior and various morphological characteristics, Vrba and Schaller (2000:220) concluded that Pantholops “has no close recent relatives and represents an ancient lineage that diverged during the Miocene from the closest living forms [Caprinae].” Grubb (2005) placed P. hodgsonii in the subfamily Caprinae.

  • Pantholops hodgsonii (Abel, 1826)

  • Chiru or Tibetan Antelope

  • Antelope hodgsonii Abel, 1826:233–234. Type locality “Tingri Maidan, a fine plain or valley, through which the Arrun flows … beyond the snows made by Kooti pass [ =  Tibet].”

  • A[ntilope (Oryx)]. kemas? Hamilton-Smith, 1827:196, 199. Type locality “Chandang, north-west of Digurgu, in the Himalaya mountains;” described as the “Unicorn Chiru of Bhote, in all likelihood, the Unicorn of the ancient Persians.”

  • Antilope [(Antilope)] chiru Lesson, 1827:371. Type locality “les habitans du Népaul [ =  Nepal].”

  • Antilope [(Pantholops)] hodgsonii: Hodgson, 1834:81. Name combination.

  • Antilope Hodgesonii Hodgson, 1838:154. Incorrect subsequent spelling of Antilope hodgsonii Abel, 1826.

  • Pantholops hodgsonii Hodgson, 1842:282. First use of current name combination.

  • Kemas hodgsoni: Gray, 1843:157. Name combination and incorrect subsequent spelling of Antilope hodgsonii Abel, 1826.

  • Context and Content. Context as for genus. P. hodgsonii is monotypic.

    Nomenclatural Notes. According to Sclater and Thomas (1887), the 1st description of this species was published by C. Abel in the Calcutta Government Gazette in 1826 and was formalized in his correspondence to The Philosophical Magazine and Journal in the same year. We were unable to locate the “article” in the Gazette, and following other zoologists who seemingly had the same difficulty and constructed synonymies of P. hodgsonii without it, we provide reference only to the article in the Philosophical Magazine. In the mid-1820s, specimens and descriptions of this species were being shared by naturalists such as Abel, Hodgson, Lesson, and Hamilton-Smith with follow-up “publications” and correspondences that overlapped one another in time (Sclater and Thomas 1887). We defer to the summary of Sclater and Thomas (1887:46–47) of the nomenclatural sequence of events and rely on Abel's correspondence in the Philosophical Magazine as the starting point of this synonymy.


    Pantholops hodgsonii is the only completely endemic species of large mammal on the Tibetan Plateau (Schaller 1998); it has no congeners and is unique among ungulates of comparable size. Unlike other caprids, female P. hodgsonii do not have horns (Pilgrim 1939). Enlarged snout and fine undercoat of the pelage of both sexes and long upright lyre-shaped horns of males (Fig. 1) distinguish P. hodgsonii from other ungulates, particularly the sympatric Procapra picticaudata (Tibetan gazelle—Schaller 1998) and other Asiatic gazelles, such as Gazella subgutturosa (goitered gazelle—Kingswood and Blank 1996) and Procapra gutturosa (Mongolian gazelle—Sokolov and Lushchekina 1997).

    Fig. 1

    Mature male Pantholops hodgsonii in nuptial pelage, Qinghai Province, China, November 2006. Photograph by G. B. Schaller.


    The related, but allopatric, Saiga tatarica (saiga antelope—Sokolov 1974) is of comparable mass, except the horns are straighter and about 2 times longer in P. hodgsonii. Although both species have pronounced nasal cavities, those of saiga antelope result in unique “large lacrimal bones forming lateral sides of nasal foramen” (Sokolov 1974:1). P. hodgsonii has short and broad nasals with large nasal apertures (Pilgrim 1939).

    General Characters

    Sexes of Pantholops hodgsonii are distinguished by the larger mass of males and male-only slender black horns of “wavy triple curvature, with circular rings towards their base, which project more before than behind” (Abel 1826:233) and are often lyre-shaped (Roosevelt and Roosevelt 1926) with “rapier-like tips” (Schaller 1998:43). Hodgson's (1833) early description has been amended through time: somewhat chunky with slender legs; no preorbital glands or associated lachrymal fossa and no pedal glands (Blanford 1888; Pocock 1910); large inguinal glands, developed to fist size in males (Prater 1980; Rawling 1905), and removed from mammae (Pocock 1910); pelage dense, wooly, and fine (Blanford 1888); coloration pale fawn with pink to red to brown hints ventrally, fading to a whitish on belly (Roosevelt and Roosevelt 1926; Sclater and Thomas 1887); as rut approaches, males ≥ 3.5 years of age attain “a striking white” nuptial pelage (Fig. 1) that contrasts an almost black face; muzzle conspicuously swollen by walnut-sized lateral nasal chambers, more so in males (Hodgson 1833; Prater 1980); coloration of muzzle swelling in males varies from grayish brown in Tibet and Qinghai Province, China, to white in Xinjiang Province, providing a sharp contrast to the black face (Schaller 1998); legs grayish but males have black stripes running down the front of all 4 (Lydekker and Blaine 1914; Sclater and Thomas 1887) that are particularly obvious during rut; no distinct rump patch in either sex; ears short, somewhat pointed, and white on the back; tail short (13–14 cm—Schaller 1998), not tufted, and colored like the rump and back.

    Dentition of adult P. hodgsonii is not completely clear, but it is reduced by the loss of a pair of upper and lower premolars: i 0/3, c 0/1, p 2/2, m 3/3, total 28 (Fig. 2). Pilgrim (1939) contended that P2 and p2 were missing. In contrast, adult specimens of P. hodgsonii in the American Museum of Natural History, New York, and the mature male in Fig. 2 appear to lack P4 and p4 (N. Solounias, in litt.). Lydekker and Blaine (1914) contended that the missing pair of premolars in P. hodgsonii was similar in saiga, which lacks the anterior lower premolars; loss of such dentition through time could be related to diet (N. Solounias, in litt.). Canines are incisoriform. Upper molars have pronounced external folds; lobes are concave between and almost without medial ribs (Pilgrim 1939). Deciduous teeth are replaced first with permanent incisors beginning at about 12 months of age, 3rd molars begin to emerge at 12 months of age, and full permanent dentition is attained at 28–30 months (Schaller 1998). After 2.5 years, age of P. hodgsonii can be determined only by general wear in the center of molar cusps, which begins on the 1st molar and progresses to the 3rd molar as an individual ages; aging by counts of cementum annuli has not been satisfactory (Schaller 1998).

    Fig. 2

    Dorsal, ventral, and lateral views of skull and lateral view of mandible of adult male Pantholops hodgsonii (Bristish Museum [Natural History], specimen 1843.112.100). Greatest length of skull is 256 mm, but note that the tip of nasals is broken off.



    Pantholops hodgsonii is endemic to the Tibetan Plateau (Fig. 3) at elevations of 3,250–5,500 m (Blanford 1888; Bower 1894; Fox and Bårdsen 2005; Schaller 1998). It presently occurs, almost exclusively, in about 800,000 km2 of the Chinese provinces of Tibet (Xizang), Xinjiang, and Qinghai (Harris and Miller 1995; Ruan et al. 2005; Schaller 1998; Schaller et al. 1991) and in very small numbers in the Ladakh district of northwestern India, mainly during summer (Fox et al. 1991; Mishra et al. 2001; Ul-Haq 2002). Despite Lesson's (1827) type locality, P. hodgsonii rarely occurred in Nepal (Groves 2003; Heinen and Yonzon 1994; Schaller 1977, 1998).

    Fig. 3

    Current distribution of Pantholops hodgsonii in the Tibetan Plateau of the Chinese provinces of Tibet, Qinghai, and Xinjiang, modified from Schaller (1998) by reducing the eastern range in central Qinghai by about 150 km; boundaries of the Chang Tang Reserve depicted by the dotted line on the south and the provincial demarcation between Tibet and Xinjiang on the north; disputed boundaries between China and India depicted with heavy dashed line.


    The 300,000-km2 Chang Tang ( =  northern plain in Tibetan) Reserve, located in north-central Tibet, was established as a nature reserve in 1993 and upgraded to a national reserve in 1999. It is roughly the size of New Mexico (United States) or Germany, making it the second largest such reserve in the world, and conserves P. hodgsonii and other Tibetan biota. Relative to conservation, important contiguous reserves to the north in Xinjiang include West Kunlun Reserve (30,000 km2), Mid-Kunlun Reserve (32,000 km2), and Arjin Shan Reserve (45,000 km2). Kekexili Reserve (45,000 km2) and Sanjiangyuan Reserve (150,000 km2) occur east of Chang Tang in Qinghai, but P. hodgsonii only occurs in the western part of Sanjiangyuan. This network of reserves is important because migratory populations move north and south between Tibet and Xinjiang and west and east between Tibet and Qinghai. Nevertheless, extant populations are still threatened by human activities, including illegal harvest and competition with domestic sheep and goats (e.g., Harris 2008; Qiu and Feng 2004; Schaller 1998), and these threats have changed somewhat in the past 10–15 years (see “Conservation” section).

    Fossil Record

    Generally, Pantholops and closely related taxa are rare in the fossil record, perhaps because geological processes on the Tibetan Plateau are not conducive to fossilization (Pilgrim 1939). Miocene Qurliqnoria from the Qaidam Basin, China, is thought to be an extinct type of Pantholops (Gentry 1968, 1992:24). A “slightly smaller” extinct species, P. hundesiensis, is described from Hundes, Tibet, and is dated variously from the middle Pleistocene (Pilgrim 1939:61) about 1 million years ago to the late Pliocene (Lydekker 1901) about 2 million years ago. P. hundesiensis had a longer parietal and narrower skull, including frontals at the orbits, braincase, and occipitals, than extant P. hodgsonii (Pilgrim 1939).

    Pantholops hodgsonii is featured convincingly to some (Bate 1950), but not others (Guthrie 2000), in the 17,000-year-old Lascaux cave paintings of central France, leading to speculation that the species occurred westward into Europe through the upper Paleolithic, as did the saiga antelope, now considered an Asian steppe mammal (Sokolov 1974). Among Tibetan medicinal uses of P. hodgsonii, ground horns have been used for easing child birth and treating diarrhea, blood diseases, and ulcers (Wright and Kumar 1997), likely for several thousand years and currently by 95% of “amchis,” or shamans (Kala 2005).

    Form and Function

    Fine undercoat fibers (7–<10 µm in diameter) of Pantholops hodgsonii examined by Rollins and Hall (1999—collection site on the body not stated) were dark brown, but they can range from brown to beige and even white on the belly (Schaller 1998; Wright and Kumar 1997). Fibers have no medulla but do have internal voids; long guard hairs are “nearly snow white” with larger diameters (50–100 µm) than those of goats (50–60 µm—Rollins and Hall 1999:857). Under electron microscopy, guard hairs of P. hodgsonii show very thin walls and unique benzene-ring–like patterning; the rounded shape of the large medullar cells in the guard hairs permits forensic differentiation from goats (Donn and Yates 2002).

    Mean (± SD) body mass (kg) and mean shoulder heights (cm) of P. hodgsonii are: 4 month olds, 15.5 ± 0.9 (n  =  3), 63.4 ± 2.4 (n  =  7); 16-month-old females, 20.9 (n  =  1), 67.0 ± 2.8 (n  =  2); 16-month-old males, 25.5 ± 1.9 (n  =  2), 76.8 ± 1.6 (n  =  3); adult females, 25.9 ± 2.9 (n  =  9), 74.4 ± 2.2 (n  =  8); adult males, 38.8 ± 2.5 (n  =  2), 83.0 ± 1.4 (n  =  2—Schaller 1998; Schaller and Ren 1988). Skeletal characteristics of P. hodgsonii compared with other Bovidae suggest affinity with Caprinae (Gentry 1992). Horns on males are remarkably uniform, 54–60 cm in length with >70 cm being extreme (Sclater and Thomas 1887) and have no age rings (Fig. 3). Adult male horn tip-to-tip intervals (19–46 cm—Lydekker and Blaine 1914; Schaller 1998) display the greatest variation but are not correlated with age. Basal circumference of horns averages 12 cm, but, unlike caprids, there is no evidence that horns continue to grow after males reach adulthood at about 3.5 years of age (Schaller 1998).

    Specific skull measurements are lacking (Fig. 3). Pilgrim (1939:59) provided a general description of the skull: rather long slender braincase; frontals almost flat; orbital roof expanded laterally; supraorbital foramina almost flush with surface; no lachrymal fossa; horn cores long, slender, upright, and compressed laterally; parietal relatively long; basioccipital narrow and subtriangular and rectangular; and auditory bulla long, slender, and not inflated.

    The purpose of the walnut-sized bulbous nasal sacs on the muzzle of female and male P. hodgsonii (Pocock 1910) has been a matter of speculation. In his early description, Hodgson (1833:110) stated that the “nasal tumours” are “a round, firm, elastic swelling on each lip” that serve as “supplementary nostrils, designed to assist this exceedingly fleet animal in breathing when he is exerting all his speed [at high elevations].” Nasal sacs, which are particularly swollen in males (Prater 1980), may play a role in vocalizations during rut (Schaller 1998).

    Ontogeny and Reproduction

    Age at sexual maturity of Pantholops hodgsonii is not clearly understood but, as in other ungulates of comparable size, it probably occurs at 1.5–2.5 years of age with gestation of about 6–6.5 months (Grzimek 1990; Schaller 1998). Two mammae are present (Hodgson 1834; Schaller 1998). Neonates are precocial, can arise and nurse 12–15 min postpartum (Fig. 4), can follow their mother 1 h postpartum (Schaller et al. 2006), and are capable of outrunning ponies during their 1st day of life (Rawling 1905:53–54). Offspring grow rapidly: 15-month-old females are almost indistinguishable from adult females and males are identified by their developing horns. Males begin to leave their mothers at 10–11 months of age; some females also leave their mothers at about this age, but most remain until just before new offspring are born (Schaller 1998). Given the endangered status of P. hodgsonii, cloning has been investigated using goat and rabbit oocytes, with some blastocyst development noted (Zhao et al. 2006, 2007).

    Fig. 4

    One-month-old Pantholops hodgsonii suckling in early August (top), and a newborn calf laying in open steppe habitat in late July (bottom), Tibet. Photographs by G. B. Schaller.


    In Tibet, migratory females move south to north to their calving grounds in May–June, give birth to a single offspring in late June–early July, and return south almost immediately in late July–early August to their autumn–winter range (Schaller 1998). At least 1 population migrates east to west in Qinghai. Little information exists on the number of resident populations. Ratios of young-of-the-year to adult females vary, but under normal conditions, are 30–50 offspring : 100 adult females 1–2 months postpartum (Schaller 1998). Years of near complete reproductive failure occur from extreme weather before, during, and after parturition (Schaller 1998; Schaller et al. 2006).


    Population Characteristics

    Densities of Pantholops hodgsonii are difficult to estimate because of the expansive nature of the Tibetan Plateau and variable intersexual herding behavior, movements (migratory or resident), and space use at different times of the year. Weather, particularly snow (Schaller and Ren 1988), affects grouping behavior and area occupied, often confining populations to limited areas. These factors and demarcation and size of survey areas greatly influence density estimates, so the many published figures (e.g., Achuff and Petocz 1988; Fox and Bårdsen 2005; Schaller 1998; Schaller and Ren 1988) should not be construed to represent the entire metapopulation of P. hodgsonii. For example, during a recent winter survey of 3,384 km2 across the Chang Tang (Tibet), Kekexili, and Sanjiangyuan (Qinghai) nature reserves during the rutting season in November–December, densities of P. hodgsonii varied considerably by location, ranging from 0.03 to 9.21 individuals/km2 with an overall density of 1.77 individuals/km2 (Schaller et al. 2007). Regardless of site-specific estimates, overall densities of P. hodgsonii are clearly lower now than they were historically (Schaller 1998).

    Human presence affects densities of P. hodgsonii. In Chang Tang Nature Reserve in April 1999, October 2000, and October 2002, densities decreased as human presence (indexed by herd and tent counts) increased: low human influence, 8.15–10.98 P. hodgsonii/km2; medium, 1.07–1.74 P. hodgsonii/km2; and overall, 3.30 P. hodgsonii/km2 (Fox and Bårdsen 2005). Similarly, encounter rates of P. hodgsonii decreased from 0.59–1.28 individuals/km2 with low human influence to 0.15–0.33 individuals/km2 with medium human influence and 0.06 individuals/km2 with high human influence (Fox and Bårdsen 2005).

    As with other ungulates of comparable size, maximum life span of P. hodgsonii in the wild is likely 10+ years. Schaller (1998:68) examined 88 jaws from Tuotuohe, Qinghai, and only 3 individuals were “old,” which suggested that few P. hodgsonii “reach an advanced age.” No individuals have been maintained long enough in captivity to document longevity (Su et al. 2003). Monthly adult sex ratios suggest differential mortality of males, not uncommon to ungulates. For example, winter sex ratios of migratory P. hodgsonii in Chang Tang, where females and males occupy the same area, are 35–75 males : 100 females (Schaller 1998). Ratios of young P. hodgsonii to adult females suggest that typically up to two-thirds of individuals of ≤2 years of age die (Schaller 1998). Extreme weather, even a single snowfall event (Schaller and Ren 1988), can result in disproportionate death of young, subadults, and females, presumably from malnutrition.

    Space Use

    Pantholops hodgsonii occupies open high-elevation alpine and desert steppe habitats with flat to rolling terrain, and it infrequently occurs in mountainous terrain (Hodgson 1833; Schaller 1998; Schaller et al. 2006). Occupied habitats often have sparse vegetative cover (e.g., only about 10–15% in Chang Tang—Schaller and Ren 1988) with low primary productivity (80–160 kg/ha dry matter—Schaller 1998; Schaller et al. 2005). In the Chang Tang Nature Reserve, overall encounter rates of P. hodgsonii under low levels of human influence in April and October were twice as high at elevations > 4,900 m (0.94 individuals/km2) than at elevations of 4,700–4,900 m (0.46 individuals/km2Fox and Bårdsen 2005).

    Extant populations of P. hodgsonii are either migratory or sedentary (perhaps facultative), and both types generally display sexual segregation during the nonrutting period from January through October (Bower 1894; Schaller 1998). Deep snows can cause P. hodgsonii to modify traditional migratory movements in search of forage and as a means of avoidance; it is not suited for efficient travel through snow with a supporting area ( =  total mass/hoof area) of 411 g/cm2 (Schaller 1998). Oddly, migratory individuals of both sexes often leave winter ranges just when forage quality is beginning to increase in spring and move north into areas where vegetation is still dormant and apparently of lower quality (Schaller 1998). Satellite imagery between 2000 and 2004 in Xinjiang showed that primary production was more than twice as high on winter range of P. hodgsonii as on calving grounds when females arrived to give birth (Schaller et al. 2006), in contrast to space used by Mongolian gazelles (Leimgruber et al. 2001; Sokolov and Lushchekina 1997). Such northward migration to calve seems ill-timed relative to phenology, weather, stage of pregnancy, and ease of movement. This behavior could be vestigial from times when glacial and vegetative patterns established traditional migratory patterns that are still followed (Schaller 1998). Females also may be moving to calving grounds with low numbers of predators and other ungulates and less insect harassment (Schaller et al. 2006).

    Migratory females move greater distances than males, particularly in late spring–early summer when they can travel 300–400 km north to traditional calving grounds (Schaller 1998; Schaller et al. 2006). Movement patterns of male P. hodgsonii are more diverse and leisurely than females, seemingly taking advantage of favorable forage availability, particularly in spring. Some males move up in elevation in spring, apparently following new growth of vegetation. Other males move little between winter, summer, and rutting areas; others move short distances between winter and summer ranges; still others move northward after winter and disperse widely, returning to rut in autumn.


    Pantholops hodgsonii is an herbivorous ruminant. Foraging preferences are understood mainly from limited microhistological analyses of feces (Cao et al. 2008; Harris and Miller 1995; Schaller 1998). P. hodgsonii is a mixed feeder (Cao et al. 2008), seasonally eating grasses, sedges, forbs, and select parts of dwarf woody vegetation, although dietary diversity is constrained substantially by limited forage availability and diversity on the Tibetan Plateau (Schaller 1998). In Chang Tang Nature Reserve, annual percent use of various plants is graminoids: Stipa, 3.7–47.3%; Kobresia, 1.1–33.1%; Carex moorcroftii, 0.5–22.8%; herbaceous plants: Potentilla bifurca, 0.3–31.1%, Leontopodium, 0.2–11.9%; and dwarf shrubs: Ceratoides compacta, 0.2–63.5%, Ajania fruiticolosa, 21.2% (Schaller 1998).

    Overall, grasses and sedges represent 33–66% of the diet, being most abundant in winter diets when P. hodgsonii will dig through snow to obtain forage (Schaller 1998; Fig. 5). Seasonally, the grass Stipa is important in winter; the sedge Kobresia is eaten most often in alpine meadows and steppe habitats in summer; and the dwarf shrub C. compacta is eaten most often in desert steppe (63.5%) and less so in alpine steppe (Schaller 1998). In Kekexili Nature Reserve, Qinghai, the grass Poa accounts for 36.9% of summer diets and 26.3% of winter diets (Cao et al. 2008). Summer diets of spatially segregated male and female P. hodgsonii in Yeniugou, Qinghai, were somewhat disparate; males selected Kobresia and forbs, and females selected forbs, notably Potentilla, and avoided grasses and sedges (Harris and Miller 1995). On calving grounds in desert steppe in the western Kunlun Mountains of Xinjiang, ruminal contents of adult females had 57% C. compacta and 43% grasses and sedges, principally C. moorcroftii (Schaller et al. 2006).

    Fig. 5

    Adult male Pantholops hodgsonii pawing for scant forage (top), and adult male and female foraging in snow (bottom), Qinghai, late October. Photographs by G. B. Schaller.


    Nutritionally, diets of P. hodgsonii probably are deficient in protein (<6%) from October to May because of low forage quality on the Tibetan Plateau. During the growing season from June to August, forages eaten by P. hodgsonii have crude protein levels of 3.3–20.8% (Schaller 1998). On calving grounds, the dwarf shrub Ceratoides contained more protein (22.7–27.0%) than did grasses (13.2%), but the latter were preferred by female P. hodgsonii (Schaller et al. 2006). Forage may be deficient in minerals such as phosphorus and potassium depending on local soil fertility (Schaller 1998).

    Diseases and Parasites

    Although no known pathogen or disease singularly limits contemporary populations of P. hodgsonii, early accounts by visitors and pastoralists suggest that large disease-related die-offs occurred (Rockhill 1894), perhaps from hemorrhagic septicemia. Severe bacterial lung infections resulting in pneumonia were found in 1 dead and 1 near-dead female P. hodgsonii in Chang Tang Reserve in late summer (Schaller 1998). Feces of P. hodgsonii from Chang Tang Reserve contained light-to-moderate levels of 2 species of protozoan (also found in other Tibetan ungulates) and the nematode Enterobius, unique to P. hodgsonii (Schaller 1998).

    Ectoparasites include ≥2 species of oestrid flies: larvae of 1 species burrow under the skin and consume flesh on the rump and lower back before emerging and the other species infects nasal sinuses and the throat (Schaller 1998). Harassment by these flies can cause P. hodgsonii to stand in groups of 50+ in knee-deep water or on mudflats, ice patches, and high ridges and perhaps to dig its characteristic summer “bowl-shaped hollows” in sand and silt for near-total concealment (Schaller 1998:64–65). The latter behavior also had been thought to involve predator avoidance (Rawling 1905).

    Interspecific Interactions

    The Tibetan Plateau has a rich ungulate fauna (Sclater 1896), although it has been diminished by human activities. P. hodgsonii can be sympatric with P. picticaudata (Tibetan gazelle), Bos mutus (wild yak—Schaller and Liu 1996), Equus kiang (Tibetan wild ass or kiang), Pseudois nayaur (blue sheep or bharal—Wang and Hoffman 1987), Ovis ammon hodgsoni (Tibetan argali—Fedosenko and Blank 2005), and occasionally others, such as Przewalskium albirostris (white-lipped deer—Harris and Miller 1995; MacKinnon 2008; Schaller 1998). As in mixed ungulate assemblages elsewhere, Tibetan species likely partition food and space, relative to size and digestive capabilities, to minimize competition (Harris and Miller 1995; Schaller 1998; Schaller et al. 1991). For example, P. hodgsonii shares flatlands with Tibetan gazelle, but yak and argali tend to use hilly to mountainous areas, and the wild ass uses both (Schaller et al. 1991). During periods of sexual segregation in Yiniugou, Qinghai, female P. hodgsonii and male Tibetan gazelles use high-elevation habitats, in contrast to male P. hodgsonii and female Tibetan gazelles, which use lower-elevation habitats (Harris and Miller 1995).

    Scant information exists on predator–prey dynamics on the Tibetan Plateau, and current dynamics are a product of reduced populations of both due to various human activities. At present, P. hodgsonii does not constitute a large percentage of prey in any predator's annual diet, but it can be seasonally important. Many P. hodgonsii probably are scavenged after dying from other causes (Schaller 1998; Schaller et al. 2006). Scavengers included Ursus arctos pruinosus (Tibetan brown bear, also a predator), Vulpes ferrilata (Tibetan sand fox), Buteo hemilasius (upland buzzards), Corvus corax (ravens), and other avian species (Lian et al. 2007; Schaller 1998). In Kekexili Nature Reserve, analysis of brown bear feces suggested a summer diet consisting of 17% P. hodgsonii, presumably, mostly from scavenging dead calves (Xu et al. 2006). Forty-nine legs from 36 individual (based on DNA analyses) P. hodgsonii calves were found at 1 upland buzzard nest; calves presumably died from other causes (Lian et al. 2007). Aquila chrysaetos (golden eagles) or Aegypius monachus (cinereous vultures) were suspected predators of newborn calves in Xinjiang (Schaller et al. 2006). One of us (GBS) observed upland buzzards using horns and leg bones of P. hodgsonii to construct their nests, likely because of the scarcity of branches for nesting material.

    Canis lupus (wolf) preys on P. hodgsonii. Schaller (1998) observed a large wolf pursuing about 50 P. hodgsonii and successfully killing a pregnant female; 8 fresh wolf kills were noted elsewhere on different occasions. Wolf feces in Kunlun Shan, Xinjiang, contained 9.6% P. hodgsonii (Schaller 1998), and on calving grounds in Xinjiang, feces contained 54% (Schaller et al. 2006). Lian et al. (2007) observed 17 instances of wolves attacking and killing P. hodgsonii during seasonal migration in Kekexili Nature Reserve, Qinghai, when individuals were concentrated in herds. Vulpes vulpes (red fox) on calving grounds had 10% P. hodgsonii in their feces. Schaller (1998) reported 1 case of predation by Lynx lynx (lynx) and 1 case of P. hodgsonii in feces of Uncia uncia (snow leopard) in Chang Tang Nature Reserve. Domestic dogs killed 19 mostly young and yearling P. hodgsonii that were malnourished and impeded by deep snow near a highway in Qinghai (Schaller 1998). Presumably in response to predation risk, vigilance by P. hodgsonii decreased and time spent foraging increased as group size increased to 30 individuals (Lian et al. 2007).


    Grouping Behavior

    Pantholops hodgsonii is a herding ungulate, and grouping behavior varies considerably depending on sex, time of year, migratory patterns, weather, and insect harassment; probably the only long-lasting association is between a female and her young-of-the-year into its 2nd year (Lian et al. 2005, 2007; Schaller 1998; Schaller et al. 2006). Other group types included adult and yearling males, female and offspring, and mixed; males and females also occur singly (Lian et al. 2005; Schaller 1998).

    Among 1,000 male P. hodgsonii dispersed in the Aru Basin of the Chang Tang Nature Reserve in summer 1992, mean group size was 6.6 individuals (range: 1–82 individuals, 50% of groups 2–20 individuals); during autumn and spring migration, female herds can exceed 1,000 individuals, but they disperse into small groups of generally ≤20 individuals, with as many as 15–20% of females occurring singly (Schaller 1998). Yearling males begin to leave their mothers at 10–11 months of age and associate more regularly with males of their own age or older (Schaller 1998).

    Reproductive Behavior

    All male P. hodgsonii attain comparable body and horn size at about 3.5 years of age, and unlike related caprids, they lack a “graded system of rank” based on horn length (Schaller 1998:266). Mature male P. hodgsonii are not territorial but form harems (Fig. 6) with 1–4 females in 70% of harems, 5–8 females in 25% of harems, and >9 females in 5% of harems in Chang Tang Nature Reserve (n  =  312 harems—Schaller 1998). Lian et al. (2005) noted harems each with 2–12 females during rut in the Kekexili region of Qinghai.

    Fig. 6

    Mature male Pantholops hodgsonii tending a harem in December with a typical Tibetan backdrop (top), and mature males sparring, Qinghai, late October (bottom). Photographs by G. B. Schaller.


    Male P. hodgsonii tend to space themselves individually throughout rutting areas and avoid serious horn-to-horn combat with various head-up (28% of 54 interactions), neck-low (28%), and exaggerated head-down (18%) displays and chases (22%); only 4% of male-to-male interactions during rut were sparring (Schaller 1998; Fig. 6). During 6 extensive surveys by GBS in the range of P. hodgsonii during the November–December rut, only 1 mature male was found with what appeared to be a fatal puncture wound to the abdomen. Most aggressive interactions involve 1 male trotting or lunging with head down and horns aimed at a rival; such behavior often terminates the interaction, but as rut intensifies, chases of up to 1 km are not uncommon (Schaller 1998). In contrast, early accounts claimed that rutting males fought with vigor, often resulting in serious injury and death (Rawling 1905). Vocalizations of rutting males may involve the enlarged nasal sinuses that serve as “resonators” and include “growl or croak like muffled toads” (Schaller 1998:263) or “deep-toned roar[s] of rage and defiance” (Rawling 1905:311).

    Courtship and mating of P. hodgsonii are abrupt and brief, with cursory displays and contacts (Schaller 1998). Early in rut, males spend considerable time chasing females to maintain a harem, and females seem disinterested; as rut progresses, females tolerate closer proximity of males and may circle back toward them when chased. When the female is receptive, the male approaches her with his head up and in a distinctive walking gait with stiff forelegs raised high (Schaller 1998). While in close proximity to females, male P. hodgsonii do not display many of the courting behaviors common among ungulates; front-leg kicks that skim a female's thigh are common, but crouching, low-stretch behavior upon approach and vulva sniffing, nuzzling, and licking were not observed (Schaller 1998). Occasionally, males display a lip-curl after inspecting an area where a female had previously urinated or defecated. A male copulates by rearing upright, balancing on its hind legs, with minimal contact with its mate (Schaller 1998).

    Miscellaneous Behavior

    Pantholops hodgsonii is virtually unknown in zoos. Some P. hodgsonii have been born and orphans have been reared successfully in a 200-ha fenced enclosure in native habitat in Qinghai; one of us (GBS) noted 4 adult males, 1 yearling male, 5 females, and 9 orphaned young lived in that enclosure in November 2007. One P. hodgsonii lived among a Tibetan herdsman's sheep and goats for 17 months (Su et al. 2003).


    All chromosomes of Pantholops hodgsonii are acrocentric with a diploid number (2n)  =  60 (Zhao et al. 2006). Analyses of 12S and 16S rRNA mitochondrial (Kuznetsova et al. 2002), the entire cytochrome-b (Xu et al. 2005), and hemoglobin alpha-chain (Yang et al. 2007) genes suggest phylogenetic affinity of P. hodgsonii with Ovis and various caprids (e.g., Capra hircus). Evaluation of the entire control region of the mitochondrial DNA suggests closer affinity to domestic sheep than to domestic goats, both of Tibetan breeds (Feng et al. 2008). Combined rDNA and morphological analyses suggest placement of P. hodgsonii as a sister clade to Caprinae (Gatesy et al. 1997). Positive selection for the cytochrome-c oxidase subunit I gene in P. hodgsonii and the yak may reflect an adaptation for living at high elevations (Xu et al. 2005).

    Three extant populations of P. hodgsonii have levels of mitochondrial DNA nucleotide diversity (π  =  2.18%) comparable to that of other antelopes and show high levels of gene flow among them relative to migration routes, calving grounds, and early expansion from ancestral populations (Ruan et al. 2005). In Qinghai, genetic assessments of a population of P. hodgsonii showed that 9 of 25 microstallite loci examined had high levels of genetic diversity, with 7–12 alleles per locus (Zhou et al. 2007). Forensically, partial DNA fragments of cytochrome b in fibers from the pelage of P. hodgsonii can be differentiated from those in fibers of sheep and goats (Lee et al. 2006).


    Pantholops hodgsonii is a Class I protected species in China, and hunting has been prohibited since the early 1990s (Schaller 1998). P. hodgsonii also is protected as endangered in India and Nepal (Wright and Kumar 1997) and by laws and conventions of, for example, the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (2006), Appendix I of the Convention on International Trade of Endangered Species (2007), the European Union's (2008) Council Resolution restricting trade, and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (2006). From a high of perhaps a million or more, the range-wide population was estimated at only 65,000–72,500 in the mid-1990s (Schaller 1998) and currently may be about 100,000, but no adequate census of the total number of P. hodgsonii has ever been conducted. Schaller et al. (2005) noted increased numbers of P. hodgsonii in some areas of Chang Tang between the 1990s and 2003, but recent local extirpations of subpopulations also have been noted (Harris and Loggers 2004; Harris et al. 1999). Clearly, the great herds of P. hodgsonii and other Tibetan ungulates are a distant memory, and substantial conservation challenges have emerged with changing governmental policies and their impact on culture and ecology.

    Based on lithic assemblages with specialized blade technology from the northern Chang Tang (Schaller 1998), humans probably have occupied the Tibetan Plateau since the late Pleistocene–early Holocene 15,000–25,000 years ago (Brantingham et al. 2001). Given sparse resources for subsistence on the Plateau, humans have been dependent on hunting ungulates to varying degrees since initial occupation (Ekvall 1968; Huber 2005). Traditional hunting techniques for P. hodgsonii vary by season (Huber 2005) and include leghold traps made with a circular base of horn, soaked until pliable (Goldstein and Beall 1990), and pegs of bone (Bower 1894) or wood (Rawling 1905) that radiate toward the center of the base; such traps are placed over a hole for deep penetration of a leg and do not permit a captured animal from withdrawing its leg after stepping through it. Drive lines with diversionary barriers also were used to funnel P. hodgsonii toward waiting hunters and leghold traps; P. hodgsonii is reluctant to cross barriers of even low stature (J. L. Fox and D. Tsechoe, in litt.; Huber 2005).

    Since the mid-1900s, significant changes have occurred in the traditional lifestyles of Tibetan pastoralists (Fig. 7) and their grazing livestock, primarily sheep and goats followed by domestic yaks and horses (Ekvall 1968; Goldstein and Beall 1990; Harris 2008; Miller 2000; Schaller 1998; Yan et al. 2005). Before that time, pastoralists were relatively limited in their movements, bound by heredity to a monastery or elite family, and operated under a triennial pasture-allocation system based on numbers of family members and livestock (Goldstein and Beall 1990; Miller 2000; Schaller 1998; Schaller et al. 2005). In the 1950s, roads began to penetrate the Plateau, and in the late 1960s, the government of China abolished most private property rights, established cooperatives, and began ongoing relocation of families. In the early 1980s, cooperatives were changed to a household-responsibility system (Banks 2003; Banks et al. 2003) with livestock becoming private again. Most recently, parcels of previously communal land have been divided into household-based rangeland used by a single family or a group of related families on 30- to 70-year leases, which effectively turned the nomad into a sedentary private rancher (Schaller et al. 2005).

    Fig. 7

    Poacher's camp with a pile of carcasses and heads of Pantholops hodgsonii in Tibet, December (top), and nomad tents and herds of sheep and goats occupy traditional range of P. hodgsonii in western Tibet, July (bottom). Photographs by G. B. Schaller.


    Some of these changes have improved the socioeconomic status of pastoralists (e.g., dwelling in houses instead of tents, using electricity from solar panels, and traveling by motorcycles instead of horses), but others have modified traditional ways of life and affected wildlife adversely (Fox et al. 2004; Harris 2008). Reminiscent of the western United States in the 1800s, land “ownership” has led to construction of fences to delineate household and rangeland boundaries (Miller 2000). This in turn limits movements of domestic animals and hinders movements of wild ones, in the latter sometimes causing mortality from entanglement in fences. Roads encroach into heretofore remote areas, which can lead to increased poaching and affect wildlife movement (Yin et al. 2006). Improvements invariably increase densities of humans and domestic livestock—often on the most productive rangeland (Schaller et al. 2005), and they can cause unintentional habitat degradation (Banks 2003; Banks et al. 2003) and reduced carrying capacity for wildlife (Schaller 1998). Wildlife in the Chang Tang region now shares rangeland with >8 million head of livestock (Harris 2008).

    Although legal actions are in place to protect P. hodgsonii, many challenges remain. Notably, illegal trade in the hides of P. hodgsonii is an ongoing threat because of the black market for its wool (Wright and Kumar 1997), which is finer than cashmere and used to make expensive “shahtoosh” shawls and scarves (Li et al. 2000; Næss et al. 2004; Schaller 1998; Traffic Network 1999). Shahtoosh is Persian for “from nature and fit for a king,” or shortened to “king of wools” (Traffic Network 1999:1). The only way to get wool from P. hodgsonii is by killing, and it can take 3–5 hides to make a single shawl. Wool cannot be sheared or combed because the fibers are very short and attached to the base of guard hairs, making husbandry infeasible.

    According to the Chinese government, about 20,000 P. hodgsonii were poached annually in the late 1990s, primarily to make shahtoosh shawls and scarves (Schaller et al. 2005; Traffic Network 1999; Fig. 7). Such garments can sell for U.S.$1,000–5,000 a piece (Traffic Network 1999) and sometimes as much as U.S.$15,000–17,600 depending on length (Schaller et al. 2005; Wright and Kumar 1997). Amazingly, black-market bartering, with profit margins approaching 600%, often results in movement of bones and other parts of endangered Indian tigers (Panthera tigris) to Asian markets in exchange for wool of P. hodgonsii that moves illegally into Nepal and India (Wright and Kumar 1997). Legal inroads have been made in thwarting traditional black-market routes and worldwide demand for shahtoosh garments (Traffic Network 1999), but continued vigilance and education are needed (Donn and Yates 2002; Wright and Kumar 1997).

    Current conservation challenges for P. hodgsonii include minimizing habitat degradation from pastoralist activities (e.g., overgrazing by domestic species) and threats from development (e.g., road, fences, and mining) that disrupt movement of wildlife; eliminating poaching and trade in hides; and establishing and appropriately managing reserves to protect extant populations of all Tibetan fauna. Remarkable progress has been made by the Chinese government in expanding the contiguous reserve network in the Chang Tang region, which already includes about 600,000 km2 and all the migratory routes of P. hodgsonii. The challenge will be to manage the reserve network well. Basic ecological insights on P. hodgsonii and associated fauna and flora of the Tibetan Plateau are still needed to establish the most effective and lasting conservation strategies.


    The etymology of Pantholops hodgsonii is “all” (pans, Greek) “antelope” (antholops, Greek), which is now misleading because of its phylogenetic affiliation with Caprinae. Along with chiru ( =  Tibetan for antelope), other common names of P. hodgsonii include tsus (male), chus (female), chuhu, tso, tsi, and tsod (Tibetan), orongo or orong (Mongolian), zangling yang (Chinese), and Tibetan antelope (English). The importance of P. hodgsonii to native Tibetans is reflected in their year-specific names given to females and males, in part based on dentition and horn growth; for example, 1-year-old, gtsod-ris, ris-thog, or ri'u both sexes; 2-year-old, tshe-ris-ma and ra-bzhi for females, sgam-gtsod and rna-bzhi for males; 4-year-old, so-drug meaning 6 teeth, both sexes; and 8+ years old, chib-gsum, both sexes, meaning 3 units of measurement, likely related to horn growth in males (Huber 2005).

    When viewed in profile, the upright and symmetrical horns on adult male P. hodgsonii led to early descriptions like “Unicorn of the ancient Persians” (Abel 1826; Hamilton-Smith 1827:196; Prater 1980). P. hodgsonii was once prized by explorers of the Tibetan highland for its excellent meat and ease of hunting (Bower 1894; Roosevelt and Roosevelt 1926; Sclater and Thomas 1887). A caricature of a chiru, named Yingying, was used as 1 of 5 mascots for the 2008 Summer Olympics in Beijing, China.


    We are particularly grateful to N. Solounias, New York Institute of Technology, for graciously examining skull specimens in the American Museum of Natural History to assess premolar dentition. We also thank J. A. Jenks, W. P. Smith, and W. D. Walter for comments on this account; A. L. Fettes and the entire staff of Interlibrary Loan Services, Oklahoma State University, and D. Wingreen-Mason, Cullman Collection, Smithsonian Libraries, Washington, D.C., for providing electronic copies of many seminal pages from rare literature; and K. Anderson and L. Tomsett of the British Museum (Natural History) for their able assistance with preparation of the skull images. The Oklahoma Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit (Oklahoma State University, Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, United States Geological Survey, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, and Wildlife Management Institute cooperating) provided technical support during the preparation of this account. G. B. Schaller's work was sponsored by the Wildlife Conservation Society, and in China, the cooperation of the State Forestry Administration, the Forestry Departments of Tibet, Qinghai, and Xinjiang, and the Tibet Plateau Institute of Biology was greatly appreciated. Since 1895, the Wildlife Conservation Society ( has been dedicated to preserving biodiversity, teaching ecology, and inspiring care of our wildlife heritage.

    Literature Cited

    1. C. Abel 1826. On the supposed unicorn of the Himalayas. Philosophical Magazine and Journal 68:232–234. Google Scholar

    2. P. Achuff and R. Petocz . 1988. Preliminary resource inventory of the Arjin Mountains Nature Reserve, Xinjiang, People's Republic of China. Gland, Switzerland World Wide Fund for Nature. Google Scholar

    3. T. Banks 2003. Property rights reform in rangeland China: dilemmas on the road to the household ranch. World Development 31:2129–2142. Google Scholar

    4. T. Banks, C. Richard, P. Li, and Z. Yan . 2003. Community-based grassland management in western China. Mountain Research and Development 23:132–140. Google Scholar

    5. D. M. A. Bate 1950. The “Licorne” of Lascaux. Is it Pantholops. Archaeological News Letter, London 2:182–184. Google Scholar

    6. W. T. Blanford 1888. The fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Mammalia. London, United Kingdom Taylor and Francis. Google Scholar

    7. H. Bower 1894. Diary of a journey across Tibet. London, United Kingdom Rivington, Percival and Company. Google Scholar

    8. P. J. Brantingham, J. W. Olsen, and G. B. Schaller . 2001. Lithic assemblages from the Chang Tang region, northern Tibet. Antiquity 75:319–327. Google Scholar

    9. Y. Cao, J. Su, X. Lian, T. Zhang, and Q. Cui . 2008. Food habits of Tibetan antelope (Pantholops hodgsonii) in the Kekexili Nature Reserve. Acta Theriologica Sinica 28:14–19. Google Scholar

    10. Convention on International Trade of Endangered Species 2007. Appendices I, II, and III. (16 January 2008).  Google Scholar

    11. T. Donn and B. C. Yates . 2002. Identification guidelines for shahtoosh and pashmina. Identification Notes of Wildlife Law Enforcement No. M-02-01. National Fish and Wildlife Forensics Laboratory, Ashland, Oregon.  Google Scholar

    12. R. B. Ekvall 1968. Fields on the hoof: nexus of Tibetan nomadic pastoralism. Case Studies in Cultural Anthropology. New York Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Google Scholar

    13. European Union 2008. Endangered species of wild fauna and flora. (20 January 2008).  Google Scholar

    14. A. K. Fedosenko and D. A. Blank . 2005. Ovis ammon. Mammalian Species 773:1–15. Google Scholar

    15. Z. Feng, B. Fan, K. Li, Q. D. Zhang, Q. S. Yang, and B. Liu . 2008. Molecular characteristics of Tibetan antelope (Pantholops hodgsonii) mitochondrial DNA control region and phylogenetic inferences with related species. Small Ruminant Research 75:236–242. Google Scholar

    16. J. L. Fox and B-J. Bårdsen . 2005. Density of Tibetan antelope, Tibetan wild ass and Tibetan gazelle in relation to human presence across the Chang Tang Nature Reserve of Tibet, China. Acta Zoologica Sinica 51:586–597. Google Scholar

    17. J. L. Fox, P. Mathiesen, T. T. Drolma, M. W. NÆss, and B. Xu . 2004. Modern wildlife conservation initiatives and the pastoralist/hunter nomads in northwestern Tibet. Rangifer, Special Issue 15:17–27. Google Scholar

    18. J. L. Fox, C. Nurbu, and R. S. Chundawat . 1991. The mountain ungulates of Ladakh, India. Biological Conservation 58:167–190. Google Scholar

    19. J. Gatesy, G. Amato, E. Vrba, G. Schaller, and R. DeSalle . 1997. A cladistic analysis of mitochondrial ribosomal DNA from the Bovidae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 7:303–319. Google Scholar

    20. A. W. Gentry 1968. The extinct bovid genus Qurliqnoria Bohlin. Journal of Mammalogy 49:769. Google Scholar

    21. A. W. Gentry 1992. The subfamilies and tribes of the family Bovidae. Mammal Review 22:1–32. Google Scholar

    22. M. C. Goldstein and C. M. Beall . 1990. Nomads of western Tibet: the survival of a way of life. Berkeley University of California Press. Google Scholar

    23. J. E. Gray 1843. List of the specimens of Mammalia in the collection of the British Museum. London, United Kingdom George Woodfall and Son. Google Scholar

    24. J. E. Gray 1872. Catalogue of ruminant mammals (Pecora, Linnaeus) in the British Museum. London, United Kingdom Taylor and Francis. Google Scholar

    25. C. Groves 2003. Taxonomy of ungulates of the Indian subcontinent. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 100:314–362. Google Scholar

    26. P. Grubb 2005. Order Artiodactyla. 637–722. in D. E. Wilson and D. M. Reeder , editors. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Baltimore, Maryland Johns Hopkins University Press. 3rd ed.  Google Scholar

    27. B. Grzimek 1990. Grzimek's encyclopedia of mammals. Vol. 5. New York McGraw-Hill Publishing Company. Google Scholar

    28. R. D. Guthrie 2000. Paleolithic art as a resource in artiodactyl paleobiology. 96–127. in E. Vrba and G. B. Schaller , editors. Antelopes, deer, and relatives: fossil record, behavioral ecology, systematics, and conservation. New Haven, Connecticut Yale University Press. Google Scholar

    29. C. Hamilton-Smith 1827. The class Mammalia. Supplement to the order Ruminantia. 196–200. in E. Griffith, C. Hamilton-Smith, and E. Pidgeon , editors. The animal kingdom, arranged in conformity with its organization, by the Baron Cuvier, with additional descriptions of all the species hitherto named, and of many not before noticed. London, United Kingdom G. B. Whittaker. Vol. IV.  Google Scholar

    30. R. B. Harris 2008. Wildlife conservation in China: preserving the habitat of China's Wild West. Armonk, New York M. E. Sharpe. Google Scholar

    31. R. B. Harris and C. O. Loggers . 2004. Status of Tibetan plateau mammals in Yeniugou, China. Wildlife Biology 10:91–99. Google Scholar

    32. R. B. Harris and D. J. Miller . 1995. Overlap in summer habitats and diets of Tibetan Plateau ungulates. Mammalia 59:197–212. Google Scholar

    33. R. B. Harris, D. H. Pletscher, C. O. Loggers, and D. J. Miller . 1999. Status and trends of Tibetan plateau mammalian fauna, Yeniugou, China. Biological Conservation 87:13–19. Google Scholar

    34. J. T. Heinen and P. B. Yonzon . 1994. Review of conservation issues and programs in Nepal: from single species focus toward biodiversity protection. Mountain Research and Development 14:61–76. Google Scholar

    35. B. H. Hodgson 1833. Further illustrations of the Antilope Hodgsonii, Abel. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, Part 1:110–111. Google Scholar

    36. B. H. Hodgson 1834. Letter on various zoological subjects, with additional observations on the chiru antelope (Antilope Hodgsonii, Abel). Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 2:81–82. Google Scholar

    37. B. H. Hodgson 1838. A classified catalogue of Nepalese Mammalia. Proceedings of Learned Societies. Linnaean Society. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 11:152–154. Google Scholar

    38. B. H. Hodgson 1842. Notice of the mammals of Tibet. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 11:282–283. Google Scholar

    39. T. Huber 2005. Antelope hunting in northern Tibet: cultural adaptations to wildlife behaviour. Memorie della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano 23:5–17. Google Scholar

    40. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources 2006. IUCN Red list of threatened species. (27 June 2007).  Google Scholar

    41. C. P. Kala 2005. Health traditions of Buddhist community and role of amchis in trans-Himalayan region of India. Current Science 89:1331–1338. Google Scholar

    42. S. C. Kingswood and D. A. Blank . 1996. Gazella subgutturosa. Mammalian Species 518:1–10. Google Scholar

    43. M. V. Kuznetsova, M. V. Kholodova, and A. A. Luschekina . 2002. Phylogenetic analysis of sequences of the 12S and 16S rRNA mitochondrial gene in the family Bovidae: new evidence. Russian Journal of Genetics 38:942–950. [Translated from Genetika 38:1115–1124.]. Google Scholar

    44. J. C-I. Lee, et al 2006. DNA profiling of shahtoosh. Electrophoresis 27:3359–3362. Google Scholar

    45. R. Lei, Z. Jiang, Z. Hu, and W. Yang . 2003. Phylogenetic relationships of Chinese antelopes (subfamily Antilopinae) based on mitochondrial ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Journal of Zoology (London) 261:227–237. Google Scholar

    46. P. Leimgruber, W. J. McShea, C. J. Brookes, L. Bolor-Erdene, C. Wemmer, and C. Larson . 2001. Spatial patterns in relative primary productivity and gazelle migration in the eastern steppes of Mongolia. Biological Conservation 102:205–212. Google Scholar

    47. R-P. Lesson 1827. Manuel de mammalogie, ou histoire naturelle des mammiferes. Paris, France Roret Libraire. Google Scholar

    48. Y-M. Li, Z. Gao, X. Li, S. Wang, and J. Niemelä . 2000. Illegal wildlife trade in the Himalayan region of China. Biodiversity and Conservation 9:901–918. Google Scholar

    49. X-M. Lian, J-P. Su, T-Z. Zhang, and Y-F. Cao . 2005. The characteristics of social groups of the Tibetan antelope (Pantholops hodgsonii) in the Kekexili region. Acta Ecologica Sinica 25:1341–1346. Google Scholar

    50. X. Lian, T. Zhang, Y. Cao, J. Su, and S. Thirgood . 2007. Group size effects on foraging and vigilance in migratory Tibetan antelope. Behavioural Processes 76:192–197. Google Scholar

    51. R. Lydekker 1901. On the skull of a chiru-like antelope from the ossiferous deposits of Hundes (Tibet). Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society 57:289–292. Google Scholar

    52. R. Lydekker and G. Blaine . 1914. Catalogue of the ungulate mammals in the British Museum (Natural History). Vol. III. London, United Kingdom Trustees of the British Museum. Google Scholar

    53. J. MacKinnon 2008. Order Artiodactyla. 451–480. in A. T. Smith and Y. Xie , editors. A guide to the mammals of China. Princeton, New Jersey Princeton University Press. Google Scholar

    54. D. J. Miller 2000. Tough times for Tibetan nomads in western China: snowstorms, settling down, fences and the demise of traditional nomadic pastoralism. Nomadic Peoples 4:83–109. Google Scholar

    55. C. Mishra, H. H. T. Prins, and S. E. van Wieren . 2001. Overstocking in the trans-Himalayan rangelands of India. Environmental Conservation 28:279–283. Google Scholar

    56. M. W. NÆss, D. Lhagyal, D. Yangsom, P. Mathiesen, J. L. Fox, and B. J. Bårdsen . 2004. Nomadic pastoralism in the Aru Basin of Tibet's Chang Tang. Rangifer, Special Issue 15:39–46. Google Scholar

    57. P. S. Pallas 1766. Miscellanea zoological quibus novae imprimis atque obscurae animalium species describuntur et observationibus iconibusque illustrantur. Hague comitun. The Hague, Netherlands Petrum van Cleef. Google Scholar

    58. G. E. Pilgrim 1939. The fossil Bovidae of India. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India, New Series 26:1–356. + plates I–VIII. Google Scholar

    59. R. I. Pocock 1910. On the specialised cutaneous glands of ruminants. Proceedings of the General Meetings for Scientific Business of the Zoological Society of London 1910:840–986. Google Scholar

    60. S. H. Prater 1980. The book of Indian animals. Bombay, India Bombay Natural History Society. Google Scholar

    61. L. Qiu and Z-J. Feng . 2004. Effects of traffic during daytime and other human activities on the migration of Tibetan antelope along the Qinghai–Tibet highway, Qinghai–Tibet plateau. Acta Zoologica Sinica 50:669–674. Google Scholar

    62. C. G. Rawling 1905. The great plateau: being an account of exploration in central Tibet, 1903, and of the Gartok Expedition, 1904–1905. London, United Kingdom Edward Arnold. Google Scholar

    63. W. W. Rockhill 1894. Diary of a journey through Mongolia and Tibet in 1891 and 1892. Washington, D.C Smithsonian Institution. Google Scholar

    64. C. K. Rollins and D. M. Hall . 1999. Using light and scanning electron microscopic methods to differentiate ibex goat and Tibetan antelope fibers. Textile Research Journal 69:856–860. Google Scholar

    65. T. Roosevelt and K. Roosevelt . 1926. East of the sun and west of the moon. New York Charles Scribner's Sons. Google Scholar

    66. X-D. Ruan, P-J. He, J-L. Zhang, Q-H. Wan, and S-G. Fang . 2005. Evolutionary history and current population relationships of the chiru (Pantholops hodgsonii) inferred from mtDNA variation. Journal of Mammalogy 86:881–886. Google Scholar

    67. G. B. Schaller 1977. Mountain monarchs: wild sheep and goats of the Himalaya. Chicago, Illinois University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar

    68. G. B. Schaller 1998. Wildlife of the Tibetan steppe. Chicago, Illinois University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar

    69. G. B. Schaller and G. Amato . 1998. Phylogeny of Tibetan steppe bovids. 245–259. in. Wildlife of the Tibetan steppe. Chicago, Illinois University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar

    70. G. B. Schaller, A. Kang, I. X. Cai, and Y. Liu . 2006. Migratory and calving behavior of Tibetan antelope population. Acta Theriologica Sinica 26:105–113. Google Scholar

    71. G. B. Schaller, A. Kang, T-D. Hashi, and P. Cai . 2007. A winter wildlife survey in the northern Qiangtang of Tibet Autonomous Region and Qinghai Province, China. Acta Theriologica Sinica 27:309–316. Google Scholar

    72. G. B. Schaller and W. Liu . 1996. Distribution, status, and conservation of wild yak Bos grunniens. Biological Conservation 76:1–8. Google Scholar

    73. G. B. Schaller, Z. Lu, H. Wang, and T. Su . 2005. Wildlife and nomads in the eastern Chang Tang Reserve, Tibet. Memorie della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano 23:59–67. Google Scholar

    74. G. B. Schaller and J. Ren . 1988. Effects of a snowstorm on Tibetan antelope. Journal of Mammalogy 69:631–634. Google Scholar

    75. G. B. Schaller, J. Ren, and M. Qiu . 1991. Observations on the Tibetan antelope (Pantholops hodgsonii). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 29:361–378. Google Scholar

    76. W. L. Sclater 1896. The geography of mammals: no. V. The Oriental Region (continued). Geographical Journal 8:378–389. Google Scholar

    77. W. L. Sclater and O. Thomas . 1887. The book of antelopes. Vol. I. London, United Kingdom R. H. Porter. Google Scholar

    78. V. E. Sokolov 1974. Saiga tatarica. Mammalian Species 38:1–4. Google Scholar

    79. V. E. Sokolov and A. A. Lushchekina . 1997. Procapra gutturosa. Mammalian Species 571:1–5. Google Scholar

    80. Stein-Nordheim, von (translator) 1884. Reisen in Tibet und am oberen Lauf de Gelben Flusses in den Jahren 1879 bis 1880. Jena, Germany H. Costenoble. [“Freely transferred to the German and annotated” by Stein-Nordheim from the original Russian version by N. M. Przheval'skii.]. Google Scholar

    81. J. Su, X. Lian, Y. Cao, and T. Zhang . 2003. AILING: the first domesticated Tibetan antelope. Acta Theriologica Sinica 23:83–84. Google Scholar

    82. Traffic Network 1999. Fashion statement spells death for Tibetan antelope. World Wide Fund for Nature and The World Conservation Union. (24 December 2007).  Google Scholar

    83. S. Ul-Haq 2002. Mountain ungulates of Ladakh, Jammu, and Kashmir. ENVIS Bulletin: Wildlife and Protected Areas 1:27–29. Google Scholar

    84. United States Fish and Wildlife Service 2006. Final rule to list the Tibetan antelope as endangered through its range. Federal Register 71:15620–15629. Google Scholar

    85. E. Vrba and G. B. Schaller . 2000. Phylogeny of Bovidae based on behavior, glands, skulls, and postcrania. 203–220. in Antelopes, deer, and relatives: fossil record, behavioral ecology, systematics, and conservation. E. Vrba and G. B. Schaller , editors. New Haven, Connecticut Yale University Press. Google Scholar

    86. X. Wang and R. S. Hoffman . 1987. Pseudois nayaur and Pseudois schaeferi. Mammalian Species 278:1–6. Google Scholar

    87. B. Wright and A. Kumar . 1997. Fashioned for extinction: an exposé of the shahtoosh trade. New Delhi, India Wildlife Protection Society of India. Google Scholar

    88. A. Xu, Z. Jiang, C. Li, J. Guo, G. Wu, and P. Cai . 2006. Summer food habits of brown bears in Kekexili Nature Reserve, Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau, China. Ursus 17:132–137. Google Scholar

    89. S-Q. Xu, et al 2005. A mitochondrial genome sequence of the Tibetan antelope (Pantholops hodgsonii). Genomics, Proteomics and Bioinformatics 3:5–17. Google Scholar

    90. Z. Yan, N. Wu, D. Yeshi, and J. Ru . 2005. A review of rangeland privatisation and it implications in the Tibetan Plateau, China. Nomadic Peoples 9:31–51. Google Scholar

    91. Y. Yang, et al 2007. Molecular cloning of hemoglobin alpha-chain gene from Pantholops hodgsonii, a hypoxic tolerance species. Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 40:426–431. Google Scholar

    92. B. Yin, H. Huai, Y. Zhang, L. Zhou, and W. Wei . 2006. Influence of the Qinghai–Tibetan railway and highway on the activities of wild animals. Acta Ecologica Sinica 26:3917–3923. Google Scholar

    93. Z-J. Zhao, et al 2006. Rabbit oocyte cytoplasm supports development of nuclear transfer embryos derived from the somatic cells of the camel and Tibetan antelope. Journal of Reproduction and Development 52:449–459. Google Scholar

    94. Z-J. Zhao, et al 2007. Interspecies nuclear transfer of Tibetan antelope using caprine oocyte as recipient. Molecular Reproduction and Development 74:412–419. Google Scholar

    95. H. Zhou, D. Li, Y. Zhang, T. Yang, and Y. Liu . 2007. Genetic diversity of microsatellite DNA loci of Tibetan antelope (chiru, Pantholops hodgsonii) in Hoh Xil National Nature Reserve, Qinghai, China. Journal of Genetics and Genomics 34:600–607. Google Scholar


    [1] Associate editors of this account were David A. Zegers and Pamela Owen. Synonymies were reviewed by Alfred L. Gardner and Colin P. Groves. Editor was Meredith J. Hamilton.

    David M. Leslie and George B. Schaller "Pantholops Hodgsonii (Artiodactyla: Bovidae)," Mammalian Species 2008(817), (9 October 2008).
    Published: 9 October 2008
    13 PAGES

    Back to Top