Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
1 January 2013 Occurrence of an Intersexual Blacktip Shark in the Northern Gulf of Mexico, with Notes on the Standardization of Classifications for This Condition in Elasmobranchs
Jill M. Hendon
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

An intersexual Blacktip Shark Carcharhinus limbatus with a testis, immature female reproductive tracts (embedded), and claspers was caught in the Gulf of Mexico. Histology of the single gonad revealed that all stages of spermatogenesis were occurring; however, the absence of ovaries and a male duct system suggests that neither sex would have been functional in this individual. Intersexuality has been reported in 17 families and 36 species of elasmobranchs. The degree to which the different sexes are present in a given individual is often difficult to categorize by normal hermaphroditic standards, as this is typically an anomalous presentation in elasmobranchs. Therefore, this report provides three categories for classification (basic, incomplete, and complete intersexuality) to standardize terminology and allow for more precise comparisons to be made among elasmobranch examples. Basic intersexuals have gonadal tissue of only one sex and a combination of other male and female characters with neither or only one sex being complete. Incomplete intersexuals have gonadal tissue of both sexes and a combination of other male and female characters; however, neither or only one sex is complete. Complete intersexuals have claspers as well as gonadal tissue and tracts for both sexes. The majority of the reported intersexual elasmobranchs, including the shark described here, are basic intersexuals.

Intersexuality, or the presence of both male and female sex characters (including primary and secondary features) in an individual, has been reported in a wide range of taxa (Armstrong and Marshall 1964). Many intersexual vertebrates are also considered hermaphroditic because they possess the gonads of both sexes, implying that there could be functionality of both at some point during the individual's lifetime. Among vertebrates, teleost fishes have a relatively high occurrence of normal hermaphroditism, which is thought to have evolved as an adaptation to increase reproductive yield (Devlin and Nagahama 2002). However, intersexuality has rarely been reported in elasmobranch fishes. As sex designation for elasmobranchs is a genetically determined gonochoristic expression, the presence of both sexes in an individual is typically considered abnormal and an “unadaptive characteristic” (Atz 1964).

Many of the terms traditionally used to describe intersexuals are defined by normal hermaphroditic functionality (e.g., simultaneous and sequential; Sadovy and Shapiro 1987). Therefore, it is not possible to classify the typically gonochoristic elasmobranch examples by these means. The term pseudohermaphrodite, which describes a case in which the externally apparent sex is different from the internal anatomical designation, has been used (e.g., Irvine et al. 2002), and while this term does apply to known elasmobranch examples it does not fully capture the variation in intersexual expression that has been found in this group.

The Blacktip Shark Carcharhinus limbatus is one of themost abundant shark species in the western North Atlantic Ocean and an important commercial species in the southeastern United States (Castro 1996). As this shark is relatively abundant, well studied, and frequently encountered, we would expect that any normal hermaphroditic tendencies for this species would be well documented; however, only one case of intersexuality has been reported from a specimen caught in the Atlantic Ocean off the southeastern United States (Castro 1996). In this article we describe a second example of an intersexual Blacktip Shark that was collected during routine shark sampling in Mississippi waters. The literature on intersexual elasmobranchs was also compiled to put this Blacktip Shark into context with other reported specimens. As there were no existing terms for classifying the full range of expression of intersexuality found in elasmobranchs, three new terms are defined.

METHODS

On 12 June 2009, a Blacktip Shark was caught off Cat Island, Mississippi (30°09.223′N, 89°06.443′) during routine monthly longline sampling. The shark, which was identified in the field as a male due to the presence of claspers, was dead upon capture and therefore was measured, weighed, and placed on ice for further analysis. In the laboratory, an incision was made into the peritoneal cavity and the reproductive tissues were examined. A thin cross-section of tissue was taken from multiple sections of the right gonad, preserved in 10% formalin, and shipped to the University of New England for histological analysis. The tissue was processed according to routine paraffin procedures and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (Sulikowski et al. 2004); its spermatogenic development was classified based on Maruska et al. (1996).

A thorough literature search was conducted and all published records of intersexual elasmobranchs found were compiled. These reports were then grouped based on the degree to which the examples expressed male and female characters, and new classifications (basic, incomplete, and complete intersexuality) were defined.

Intersexuality classifications.—The three new classifications of elasmobranch intersexuals cover the range of male/female expression reported in the literature. Basic intersexuals have gonadal tissue of only one sex (nonhermaphroditic) and a combination of other male and female reproductive characters (primary and secondary); however, neither or only one sex is present completely. Incomplete intersexuals are hermaphroditic elasmobranchs that possess gonadal tissue of both sexes and a combination of other male and female reproductive characters (primary and secondary); however, neither or only one sex is present completely. Both basic and incomplete intersexuals have the potential to function as only one sex. Complete intersexuals are hermaphroditic elasmobranchs that exhibit claspers, gonadal tissue of both sexes, and both male and female reproductive tracts. These elasmobranchs have the potential to be functional as either sex.

RESULTS

The intersexual Blacktip Shark fromMississippiwaters had a FL of 83.8 cm, weighed 6.25 kg, and exhibited small, uncalcified claspers measuring 66 mm from the anterior cloacal opening to the tip of the clasper, which did not extend past the posterior edge of the pelvic fin. Externally, the shark appeared to be a normal juvenile male. When the peritoneal cavity was opened, both male and female reproductive structures were observed (Figures 1, 2A). Even though left and right gonads develop in normal males, only the right gonad was developing, while the left appeared undeveloped. The right gonad was 90 mm long (11 mm at the widest point), weighed 7 g, and exhibited patchy areas of development that were lobular in appearance, similar to that of maturing testicular tissue. Embedded in the dorsal wall on both the left and right sides were immature anterior and posterior oviducts with enlarging oviducal glands (left, 7.2 mm wide; right, 9.0 mm). Two undeveloped uteri were present, and the posterior portions, which were united at the cervix, were beginning to emerge from the dorsal wall. Epididymides, ductus deferentes, and seminal vesicles were not present. Histological analysis of the gonadal cross-sections revealed that the right gonad consisted exclusively of seminiferous tubules with all stages of spermatogenesis (germinal zone, early spermatocysts, spermatocytes, spermatids, immature sperm, mature spermatocyst, and a degenerate zone; Maruska et al. 1996) being present, indicating a maturing testis (Figure 2B). As this specimen did not have gonadal tissue from both sexes, it was considered a basic intersexual.

FIGURE 1.

Body cavity of the basic intersexual Blacktip Shark from Mississippi waters. Although a vertebral sample was removed prior to taking the photo, the immature female reproductive tract, including oviducal glands (Og) and uteri (U), as well as immature claspers (C) are apparent.

f01_174.jpg

Among the three types of intersexual elasmobranchs, basic intersexuality has been found in the most species, 17 (12 sharks, 2 rays, and 3 skates), from the families Squalidae, Centrophoridae, Etmopteridae, Somniosidae, Scyliorhinidae, Triakidae, Carcharhinidae, Torpedinidae, Rhinobatidae, Arhynchobatidae, Rajidae, and Dasyatidae (Table 1). Incomplete intersexuality has been identified in 15 species (11 sharks, 1 ray, and 3 skates) from the families Hexanchidae, Squalidae, Etmopteridae, Somniosidae, Squatinidae, Scyliorhinidae, Carcharhinidae, Arhynchobatidae, Rajidae, and Myliobatidae (Table 1). Complete intersexuality is the most integrated form and has been identified in 11 species (7 sharks, 3 rays, and 1 skate) from the families Squalidae, Etmopteridae, Heterodontidae, Scyliorhinidae, Carcharhinidae, Torpedinidae, Narcinidae, Rajidae, and Dasyatidae (Table 1).

FIGURE 2.

Gonads of the basic intersexual Blacktip Shark from Mississippi waters. Panel (A) shows the left (LG) and right gonads (RG) and epigonal organs (LE and RE) aswell as the digitiform gland (Dg). Panel (B) is a photomicrograph of a histological cross section through the right gonad (taken from the area of the break in [A]) stained with hematoxylin and eosin. It shows spermatocysts representative of two stages of spermatogenesis: stage IV, which is characterized by early spermatids (arrows); and stage V, which is characterized by spermatids undergoing spermiogenesis (asterisks). Stages based on Maruska et al. (1996); bar = 200 µm.

f02_174.jpg

DISCUSSION

The basic intersexual Blacktip Shark described here represents the first reported occurrence of intersexuality in an elasmobranch in the Gulf of Mexico and only the second report of this condition in the species. The length and noncalcified state of the claspers initially suggested that this specimen was an immature male developing in line with normal, similarly sized males for this species (see Castro 1996). An internal examination, however, provided different insight. Only the right gonad was developing, as is consistent with most female carcharhinids, but the histology of the tissue revealed it to be testicular. The length of the gonad was slightly larger than what Castro (1996) reported for similarly sized, normal males. Although spermatogenesis was occurring in the testis, the specimen was still likely a juvenile, as spermatogenesis is known to precede clasper maturation (Clark and von Schmidt 1965). The oviducal glands were still embedded in the dorsal wall of the peritoneal cavity and were of similar size to those of juvenile females as reported by Castro (1996). The absence of ovaries and a male duct system suggests that neither sex would have been functional in this individual.

The majority (>50%) of reported basic intersexuals exhibited claspers externally and a female reproductive tract and gonad internally (e.g., Yano and Tanaka 1989; Gianeti and Vooren 2007; Haas and Ebert 2008; Pérez-Jiménez and Sosa-Nishizaki 2008). This is the most minor form of intersexuality, as the primary gonad and tract was typically unaffected. Although the basic intersexual shark from Mississippi waters did have the external claspers and internal female tract, the gonad was testicular. A Longnose Spurdog (Kousteni and Megalofonou 2010) and Smalleye Smoothhound (Springer and Lowe 1963) are examples of the reverse formation, with male gonads internally and no claspers externally.

TABLE 1.

Reported intersexual elasmobranchs. Species are categorized by degree of intersexuality as follows: B = basic intersexuality, I = incomplete intersexuality, and C = complete intersexuality (see text for more details). This nomenclature follows Compagno (2005).

t01a_174.gif

continued

t01b_174.gif

Incomplete intersexuals have the greatest combinations of male and female characters. For example, Veríssimo et al. (2003) found a Portuguese Dogfish with no claspers but an ovary and oviduct on the right as well as a testis with no male or female tract on the left, while Templeman (1987) documented a Thorny Skate, with ovaries and oviducts as well as testes and claspers. Castro's (1996) report of an intersexual Blacktip Shark described a gravid female that also possessed a clasper and possibly a testis. An “ovotestis,” a gonad with bothmale and female tissue, was also commonly found in this type of intersexuality (e.g., Yano 1995; Dalù et al. 2003). Two hexanchids have shown another variation of incomplete intersexuality in which the females routinely present a rudimentary testis within the mesovarium (Semper 1875; Daniel 1934).

Complete intersexuals exhibited the most development of both sexes within one individual. The most common presentationwas of amale and female tract on both the left and right sides of the peritoneal cavity (e.g., King 1966; Capapé et al. 1979; Pratt 1979; Jones et al. 2005). Bilateral gynandromorphic-like arrangements were also found, as was the case in the Shortnose Spurdog, which had a male gonad and tract on the right side of the peritoneal cavity and a female gonad and tract on the left side (Braccini et al. 2009). As in the incomplete intersex group, ovotestes were common in this type of intersexuality (e.g., Vayssiere and Quintaret 1914; Capapé and Zahnd 1974). Although the structures for both sexes are present in this type of intersexuality, improper development or maturation was often reported, rendering one or both sexes nonfunctional.

All three types of intersexuality have similar numbers of elasmobranch families represented. Themajority of the documented species are from the Squalidae, Etmopteridae, Scyliorhinidae, Triakidae, Arhynchobatidae, and Rajidae families. In most species only one type of intersexuality was identified; however, this number is heavily dependant on the low numbers of reported individuals, with most studies reporting only a single specimen. The Spotted Dogfish and the Longhead Catshark were the only elasmobranchs in which all three types of intersexuality were found (Table 1). Interestingly, the Longhead Catshark was also the species with the greatest number of identified intersexual specimens. Iglésias et al. (2005) reported that 85% of the 82 individuals sampled from the Indian and Pacific oceans were intersexual and suggested that this was a case of normal hermaphroditism. The incidence rate was also higher in a discrete population of Lantern Sharks in Sugura Bay, Japan, in which 21% of the 70 specimens were basic intersexuals (Yano and Tanaka 1989); however, the authors believe that this is a result of environmental contamination.

Although only one intersexual Blacktip Shark was found in all the years of routine sampling in the waters in and around Mississippi, the lack of knowledge about the occurrence of intersexuality in elasmobranchs and the rarity of the condition within the family make documentation of this information valuable for those studying the development, life history patterns, and population dynamics of elasmobranchs. It is not surprising that the majority of the reported cases are from species commonly encountered in classroom dissections (e.g., Spotted Dogfish and Spiny Dogfish) or fisheries sampling (e.g., rajids). The aqueous environment and lack of many highly visible, sexually distinguishing characters in elasmobranchs often allow such anomalies to be acknowledged only when close or internal examinations are conducted. Although the introduced classifications of basic, incomplete, and complete intersexuality clarify whether the structures necessary for reproduction are present, it is important to note that developmental and histological analysis of the structures is still necessary to determine actual functionality. It is hoped that these classifications will provide researchers with a more accurate and standardized means for assessing intersexuality in elasmobranchs.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank R. M. Simmons and B. Gregory of the Research Vessel Tom McIlwain; A. Karels and T. Holland for assistance in the collection of the Mississippi Blacktip Shark specimen; N. Brown-Peterson for histological review; J. Shaw for obtaining many of the sources; G. Poulakis, J. Mandelman, and an anonymous reviewer for their thorough evaluation of the manuscript; and J. Sulikowski for collaborative assistance. The shark discussed in this paper was collected while sampling for a NOAAfunded cooperative Southeast AreaMonitoring and Assessment Program (NA06NMF4250011). All sampling protocols were approved by University of Southern Mississippi's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (09031202 and 09031203).

REFERENCES

1.

C. N. Armstrong , and A. J. Marshall , editors. 1964. Intersexuality in vertebrates including man. Academic Press, New York.  Google Scholar

2.

D. R. Arthur 1950. Abnormalities in the sexual apparatus of the common dogfish. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London 162:52–56.  Google Scholar

3.

J.W. Atz 1964. Intersexuality in fishes. Pages 145–232 in C. N. Armstrong and A. J. Marshall , editors. Intersexuality in vertebrates including man. Academic Press, New York.  Google Scholar

4.

R. C. Bamber 1917. Note on a hermaphrodite dogfish. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 87:217–219.  Google Scholar

5.

J. M. Braccini 2009. An abnormal hermaphrodite Piked Spurdog, Squalus megalops, schooling with mature males. Marine Biodiversity Records 2:1–3.  Google Scholar

6.

J. Cadenat 1960. Notes d'ichtyologie Oust-Africaine sur un cas d'intersexualityé chez un requin de l'espèce Centrophorus lusitanicus Bocage et Capello, 1864. [West African ichthyology notes: a case of intersexuality in the shark species Centrophorus lusitanicus, Bocage and Capello, 1864. ] Bulletin de l'Institut Français d'Afrique Noire Serie A Sciences Naturelles 22:1428–1432.  Google Scholar

7.

C. Capapé 1974. Anomalie de l'appareil urogénital chez torpedo (Torpedo) marmorata Risso, 1810. [Anomaly of the urogenital tract in torpedo (Torpedo) marmorata Risso, 1810. ] Archives de l'Institut Pasteur de Tunis 51:321–328  Google Scholar

8.

C. Capapé , A. Chadli , and A. Baouendi . 1979. Cas d'hermaphrodisme chez Scyliorhinus stellaris (Linné, 1758) (Pisces, Scyliorhinidae): etude morphologique et histologique. [A case of hermaphroditism in Scyliorhinus stellaris (Linnaeus, 1758) (Pisces, Scyliorhinidae): a morphological and histological study. ] Archives de l'Institut Pasteur Tunis 56:343–351.  Google Scholar

9.

C. Capapé , and M. Desoutter . 1979. Nouvelle description de Aetomylaeus nichofii (Bloch et Schneider, 1801) (Pisces, Myliobatidæ). Premières observations biologiques. [New description of Aetomylaeus nichofii (Bloch and Schneider, 1801) (Pisces,Myliobatidae). Initial biological observations.] Cahiers de l'Indo-Pacifique 1:305–322.  Google Scholar

10.

C. Capapé , O. El Kamel-Moutalibi , N. Mnasri , M. Boumaïıza , and C. Reynaud . 2012. A case of hermaphroditism in Tortonese's Stingray, Dasyatis tortonesei (Elasmobranchii: Rajiformes: Dasyatidae) from the lagoon of Bizerte, Tunisia. Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria 42:141–149.  Google Scholar

11.

C. Capapé , and J. Zahnd . 1974. Cas d'hermaphrodisme chez Scyliorhinus canicula (Linné, 1758). [A case of hermaphroditism in Scyliorhinus canicula (Linnaeus, 1758).] Bulletin de l'Institut National Scientifique et Technique D'Océanographie et de Pêche de Salammbô 3:131–137.  Google Scholar

12.

J. I. Castro 1996. Biology of the Blacktip Shark, Carcharhinus limbatus, off the southeastern United States. Bulletin of Marine Science 59:508–522.  Google Scholar

13.

G. Chapman 1951. An abnormal reproductive system in the common dogfish (Scyliorhinus caniculus). Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 121:511–513.  Google Scholar

14.

E. Clark , and K. von Schmidt . 1965. Sharks of the central Gulf coast of Florida. Bulletin of Marine Science 15:13–83.  Google Scholar

15.

L. J. V. Compagno 2005. Checklist of living Chondrichthyes. Pages 503–548 in W. C. Hamlett , editor. Reproductive biology and phylogeny of Chondrichthyes. Science Publishers, Enfield, New Hampshire.  Google Scholar

16.

L. J. V. Compagno , and S. Springer . 1971. Iago, a new genus of carcharhinid sharks, with a redescription of I. omanensis. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 69:615–626.  Google Scholar

17.

J. F. Daniel 1934. The elasmobranch fishes. University of California Press, Berkeley.  Google Scholar

18.

M. Dalù , G. C. Consalvo , and M. Romanelli . 2003. A hermaphrodite specimen of Torpedo torpedo (Chondrichthyes, Torpedinidae). Biologia Marina Mediterranea 10:792–794.  Google Scholar

19.

R. H. Devlin , and Y. Nagahama . 2002. Sex determination and sex differentiation in fish: an overview of genetic, physiological, and environmental influences. Aquaculture 208:191–364.  Google Scholar

20.

J. R. Ellis , and S. E. Shackley . 1997. The reproductive biology of Scyliorhinus canicula in the Bristol Channel, UK. Journal of Fish Biology 51:361–372.  Google Scholar

21.

M. P. Francis 2006. Distribution and biology of the New Zealand endemic catshark, Halaelurus dawsoni. Environmental Biology of Fishes 75:295– 306.  Google Scholar

22.

A. S. Fuller, and J.M. Zacharov . 1960. Abnormalities in the urinogenital system of the common dogfish. Nature 185:50.  Google Scholar

23.

M. D. Gianeti , and C.M. Vooren . 2007.Ahermaphrodite guitarfish, Rhinobatos horkelii (Müller and Henle, 1841) (Rajiformes: Rhinobatidae), from southern Brazil. Cahiers de Biologie Marine 48:407–409.  Google Scholar

24.

D. L. Haas , and D. A. Ebert . 2008. First record of hermaphroditism in the Bering Skate, Bathyraja interrupta. Northwestern Naturalist 89:181– 185.  Google Scholar

25.

P. P. C. Hoek 1894. Die op een hermaphrodiet exemplar van de rog (Raja clavata) betrekking hebben. [A hermaphroditic example of the ray (Raja clavata).] Tijdschrift der Nederlandsche Dierkundlge Vereeniging 4:45–46.  Google Scholar

26.

S. P. Iglésias , D. Y. Sellos , and K. Nakaya . 2005. Discovery of a normal hermaphroditic chondrichthyan species: Apristurus longicephalus. Journal of Fish Biology 66:417–428.  Google Scholar

27.

S. B. Irvine , L. J.B. Laurenson , and J.D. Stevens . 2002. Hermaphroditism in the Southern Lanternshark, Etmopterus granulosus. Pages 49–54 in R. A. Martin and D. MacKinlay , editors. Biology of deep sea elasmobranchs. University of British Columbia, Vancouver.  Google Scholar

28.

A. A. Jones , W. T. White , and I. C. Potter . 2005. A hermaphroditic Port Jackson shark, Heterodontus portusjacksoni, with complete and separate female and male reproductive tracts. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 85:1171–1172.  Google Scholar

29.

A. D. King 1966. Hermaphroditism in the common dogfish (Scyliorhinus caniculus). Journal of Zoology 148:312–314.  Google Scholar

30.

V. Kousteni , and P. Megalofonou . 2010. Reproductive biology of Squalus blainvillei (Risso, 1826) in the eastern Mediterranean Sea. Rapport Commission International pour l'Exploration Scientifique de la MerMediterranée 39:562.  Google Scholar

31.

K. P. Maruska , E.G. Cowie , and T.C. Tricas . 1996. Periodic gonadal activity and protracted mating in elasmobranch fishes. Journal of Experimental Zoology 276:219–232.  Google Scholar

32.

M. E. Matta 2006. Aspects of the life history of the Alaska Skate, Bathyraja parmifera, in the eastern Bering Sea. Master's thesis. University ofWashington, Seattle.  Google Scholar

33.

J. D. Matthews 1885. Oviduct in an adult male skate. Journal of Anatomy (London) 19:144–149.  Google Scholar

34.

D. Merriman , and Y. H. Olsen . 1949. The Angel Shark, Squatina dumeril, in southern New England waters. Copeia 1949:221–222  Google Scholar

35.

P. D. F. Murray , and J. R. Baker . 1924. A hermaphrodite dogfish (Scyliorhinus canicula). Journal of Anatomy 58:335–339.  Google Scholar

36.

R. V. Nair , and R. Soundararajan . 1973. On an instance of hermaphroditism in the electric ray Narcine timlei (Bloch and Schneider). Indian Journal of Fisheries 20:260–264.  Google Scholar

37.

J. C. Pérez-Jiménez , and O. Sosa-Nishizaki . 2008. Reproductive biology of the Brown Smoothhound Shark, Mustelus henlei, in the northern Gulf of California, Mexico. Journal of Fish Biology 73:782–792.  Google Scholar

38.

H. L. Pratt 1979. Reproduction in the Blue Shark, Prionace glauca. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 77:445–470.  Google Scholar

39.

J. P. Quignard , and C. Capapé . 1972. Cas d'hermaphroditisme chez Raja miraletus L. 1758. [A case of hermaphroditism in Raja miraletus L. 1758. ] Travaux du Laboratoire de Biologie Halieutique de l'Université de Rennes 6:133–140.  Google Scholar

40.

J. P. Quignard , and N. Negla . 1971. Anomalies au niveau du système genital chez les sélaciens Rajiformes. [Abnormalities of the genital system in selachians of the order Rajiformes. ] Travaux du Laboratoire de Biologie Halieutique de l'Université de Rennes 5:121–124.  Google Scholar

41.

C. C. Ribeiro-Prado , M. C. Oddone , A. Ferreira de Amorim , and C. Capapé . 2009. An abnormal hermaphrodite Pelagic Stingray Pteroplatytrygon violacea (Dasyatidae) captured off the southern coast of Brazil. Cahiers de Biologie Marine 50:91–96.  Google Scholar

42.

W. Rowan 1929. A hermaphrodite Spiny Dogfish (Squalus suchlei). Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 99:441–443.  Google Scholar

43.

Y. Sadovy , and D. Y. Shapiro . 1987. Criteria for the diagnosis of hermaphroditism in fishes. Copeia 1987:136–156.  Google Scholar

44.

L. B. Scenna , J. M. Díaz de Astarloa , and M. B. Cousseau . 2007. Abnormal hermaphroditism in the Multispine Skate, Bathyraja multispinis. Journal of Fish Biology 71:1232–1237.  Google Scholar

45.

C. Semper 1875. Das Urogenitalsystem der Plagiostomen und seine Bedeutung Für das der übrigen Wirbeltiere. [The urogenital system of elasmobranchs and its significance for that of other vertebrates.] Pages 195–492 in C. Semper , editor. Arbeiten aus dem Zoologisch-Zootomischen Institut W¨urzburg. [Works from the Zoological Institute at Würzburg.] Druck und Verlag der Stahelschen Buch- und Kunsthandlung, Würzburg, Germany. Google Scholar

46.

S. Springer , and R. H. Lowe . 1963. A new Smooth Dogshark, Mustelus higmani, from the equatorial Atlantic coast of South America. Copeia 1963:245– 251.  Google Scholar

47.

J. A. Sulikowski , P. C. Tsang , and W. H. Howell . 2004. Annual changes in steroid hormone concentrations and gonad development in the Winter Skate, Leucoraja ocellata. Marine Biology 144:845–853.  Google Scholar

48.

W. Templeman 1987. Differences in sexual maturity and related characteristics between populations of Thorny Skate (Raja radiata) in the Northwest Atlantic. Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Science 7:155– 167.  Google Scholar

49.

A. Vayssière , and G. Quintaret . 1914. Sur un cas d'hermaphrodisme d'un Scyllium stellare L. [On a case of hermaphroditism in a Scyllium stellare L. ] Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences 158:2013–2014.  Google Scholar

50.

A. Veríssimo , L. Gordo , and I. Figueiredo . 2003. Reproductive biology and embryonic development of Centroscymnus coelolepis in Portuguese mainland waters. ICES Journal of Marine Science 60:1335–1341.  Google Scholar

51.

B. M. Wetherbee 1996. Distribution and reproduction of the Southern Lantern Shark from New Zealand. Journal of Fish Biology 49:1186–1196. Google Scholar

52.

K. Yano 1985. Studies on morphology, phylogeny, taxonomy, and biology of Japanese squaloid sharks, order Squaliformes. Doctoral dissertation. Tokai University, Shimizu, Shizouka, Japan.  Google Scholar

53.

K. Yano 1995. Reproductive biology of the Black Dogfish, Centroscyllium fabricii, collected from waters off western Greenland. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 75:285–310.  Google Scholar

54.

K. Yano , and S. Tanaka 1989. Hermaphroditism in the Lantern Shark, Etmopterus unicolor, (Squalidae, Chondrichthyes). Japanese Journal of Ichthyology 36:338–345. Google Scholar
© American Fisheries Society 2013
Jill M. Hendon "Occurrence of an Intersexual Blacktip Shark in the Northern Gulf of Mexico, with Notes on the Standardization of Classifications for This Condition in Elasmobranchs ," Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science 5(5), 174-180, (1 January 2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/19425120.2013.799618
Received: 30 September 2012; Accepted: 17 April 2013; Published: 1 January 2013
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


Share
SHARE
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top