Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2004 Preliminary Observations on the Mottledface Tamarin (Saguinus inustus) on the Lower Río Caquetá, Colombian Amazonia
Author Affiliations +

Introduction

Saguinus is the most diverse of the Neotropical primate genera, with 13 –15 species and 33 recognized forms (Hershkovitz, 1977; Rylands et al., 2000). There have been detailed studies of the feeding ecology, social organization, and behavioral ecology of the majority of the extant Saguinus species. S. leucopus is notable for the deficiency of information about it (Snowdon and Soini, 1988; Calle, 1992; Vargas and Solano, 1996; Poveda, 2000, and Cuartas-Calle, 2001), and perhaps the least known is S. inustus. The latter occurs in southeastern Colombia west of the Andes, between the Río Mesay and the frontier with Brazil, and between the Ríos Guayabero-Guaviare and Caquetá. There is still no accurate delimitation of the eastern and western boundaries of its geographical range in Colombia (Defler, 2003). S. inustus also occurs in western Brazil, between the Rios Negro and Japurá and the Colombian border. Here we present preliminary data on some aspects of the ecology of this species on the lower Río Caquetá, Colombian Amazonia and briefly discuss the importance of conducting further research on its ecology in the region.

Subjects, Study Site and Data Collection

Mottled-face tamarins are small: head-body = 208–259 mm (n = 10) with a tail slightly longer, between 330 and 410 mm (n = 10) (Hershkovitz, 1977). On the lower Río Caquetá they are known as “hueviblanco” because the males have naked external genitalia and a white scrotal sac. Otherwise black, they have white patches of skin on each side of the muzzle, which makes them easily recognizable from a distance.

The study was carried out in the interfluvial forests adjacent to the lower Ríos Caquetá and Apaporis, Colombian Amazonia. Observations were made in the vicinity of Comeyafú (1°17′S, 69°34′W), a 19,000-ha indigenous reserve on the left margin of the Río Caquetá in the state of Amazonas (Fig. 1). We first met with the community in order to tell them the purpose of conducting the study and to select people to participate in the fieldwork. With the help of field assistants we found a group of five animals frequently seen near the community. Existing trails in the area were used to search for and follow them, and additional trails were cut to cover the group's known range. We observed the group from March to June 2003, which included the end of the dry season (early rainy season) and the rainy season. For a period of 18 days we attempted to follow the group for the entire day, but this was achieved on only five days because of the lack of a more extensive trail grid. Daily ranges were drawn on a map scale 1:1000 and were measured using the distances between consecutive group positions recorded during the day. Home range size was calculated using the convex polygon method, which although possibly overestimating the range (Albernaz, 1997), was the most appropriate because the quadrate method requires a comprehensive trail grid. Trees used as feeding sources were marked with colored flagging tape and later revisited to obtain botanic specimens for identification. Information on feeding by S. inustus was limited to the animal and plant species we saw them eat.

Results and Discussion

Group size, use of space and daily ranges

Group size varied from three to six (mean 4.4, n = 5, sd = 1.14) at our study site, but larger groups were observed elsewhere. A group of 11 and another of nine were seen 22 km to the west (E. Palacios, pers. obs.). Including these two groups we have a mean group size of 6.0 (n = 7; sd = 2.7). Defler (2003) reported group sizes of three, seven, and eight individuals based on sightings in the same area. These figures are similar to those of other Saguinus species (Freese, 1975; Soini, 1987; Sussman and Kinzey, 1984; Janson and Terborgh, 1985; Kostrub, 1997; Peres, 2000). We never observed temporary associations between groups.

Our study group used an area of 35 ha, which included terra firma forest and flooded forest. The former included areas of primary and secondary forest (locally called rastrojo), and clearings abandoned after being farmed. Rastrojo alto was the local name for high secondary forest, and rastrojo bajo for low secondary forest. Flooded forest includes areas that suffer occasional flash floods (of one to a few days from overflowing creeks) as well as várzea (seasonally flooded for three to five months). A little more than half (54%) of the group's range was secondary forest, and of that mostly (93%) rastrojo bajo. Primary forest took up 34% of the home range, but we believe that this forest type would have come to comprise a larger portion of the group's home range if we had observed the group for longer. Only about 1% of the range was flooded forest. Approximately 12% of the area included in the forest matrix used by the mottled-face tamarins was occupied by the Indian's cultivation plots.

Mean daily range length was 961 m (range 750–1100 m; sd = 137; n = 5 complete days). Although the home range size is similar to S. nigricollis, S. fuscicollis, S. imperator and S. labiatus (Izawa, 1978; Terborgh, 1983; Kessler, 1995; Veracini, 2000), it is notably smaller than the ranges for S. mystax and S. fuscicollis reported by Peres (2000). This undoubtedly is a reflection of the short period of study — S. inustus range would be larger if recorded over an entire year.

Foods

The mottled-face tamarins were seen to eat the fruits of 23 plant species from 12 families and 13 genera (Table 1). These plant species were spread through terra firma (primary and secondary forest) and flooded forest, and all, except for the liana Mendoncia ovata, were trees.

Table 1.

Fruits eaten by a group of S. inustus on the lower Río Caquetá, Colombian Amazonia.

i1413-4705-12-3-123-t01.gif

Some of these fruits were typically found in the secondary forest. For instance, Mendoncia ovata was commonly seen growing in the low and high rastrojo, as was Inga thibaudiana. Other species, such as the two Pourouma spp., grow near large forest gaps and along the borders between the primary and secondary forest and the cultivated plots. Buchenavia sp. and two of the Inga species, on the other hand, were found only in the flooded forest.

As reported for other tamarins, S. inustus was also seen to eat small spiders, orthopterans, and ant larvae. These resources were commonly obtained as the tamarins foraged in the middle and lower levels of the forest, especially in the low rastrojo, where they were often seen moving about only 0.5 m above the forest floor.

Inter-specific associations

Twice we saw mottled-face tamarins interacting with groups of Callicebus torquatus. They were observed feeding together in a Pourouma cecropiifolia tree; titis and tamarins shared different levels of the tree crown, and no agonistic behaviors were seen. No encounters with other primates were recorded; continued hunting in the forests around Comeyafú and the neighboring community has extirpated the larger to middle-sized primate species such as woolly monkeys, Lagothrix lagothricha, and the tufted capuchin, Cebus apella (E. Palacios, unpubl. data). Although squirrel monkeys, Saimiri sciureus, and red howlers, Alouatta seniculus, are still present in the area, we never observed them during our time there.

Conservation Aspects

S. inustus is ranked as of Least Concern under the IUCN categorization (2001). It seems to be common around Indian villages along the lower Ríos Caquetá and Apaporis interfluvium. In general, one sees more tamarins in habitats that have been disturbed by human activities. Peres (1999), for example, found that densities of S. fuscicollis, S. mystax, and S. imperator were higher in areas subject to moderate to heavy hunting pressure than in those where hunting was minimal or non-existent. Density comparisons of the same set of species, and including S. geoffroyi, in protected and unprotected areas have shown that these species are more abundant and comprise a greater proportion of the total primate density in the latter (Freese et al., 1977; Soini, 1987). Nevertheless, some unprotected sites show densities as low or lower than those in protected sites (Muckenhirn et al., 1975; Freese et al., 1982). Plots cultivated by Indians, peasant crops, and small-scale logging have transformed many areas of the mottled-face tamarin's natural habitat. Slash-and-burn is the prevalent agricultural practice in the region, but can be considered of low impact in forest conversion only when human population densities are very low. Rural populations are growing considerably, concentrating their numbers in certain areas and making increasing demands on forest resources. The interfluvium between the Ríos Caquetá and Apaporis, east to the mouth of the Río Miriti, is a case in point, where a very large proportion of the region's indigenous population is concentrated (1.24 people/km2) and where numbers will continue to increase through immigration.

Much (60–70%) of the range of S. inustus in Colombia falls within the boundaries of indigenous reserves (Defler, 2003), along with smaller areas on the lower Río Caquetá settled by peasant families. It will be important to continue studying these tamarins and monitoring their densities along with current trends of forest clearing and other human activities, so that we can attain a better understanding of the ecology and conservation status of the species. These actions will, we hope, both continue our learning about the ecology of this interesting primate, and provide a mechanism to involve local people in joint conservation measures in their lands.

Acknowledgments

Conservation International provided funding through the Primate Action Fund, and we thank particularly Russell A. Mittermeier and William R. Konstant for their support. We also thank Rodolfo Yucuna, chief of the Comeyafú Yucuna Indigenous Community, and field assistants from the community who helped us during the study. Dairon Cárdenas from Instituto Sinchi provided valuable help with the identification of plants.

References

  1. A. L K. M. Albernaz 1997. Home range size and habitat use in the black lion tamarin (Leontopithecus chrysopygus). Int. J. Primatol 18:877–887. Google Scholar

  2. T. R. Defler 2003. Primates de Colombia, Tropical Field Guide Series. Conservación Internacional Colombia. Bogotá, DC. Google Scholar

  3. Z. Calle 1992. Informe de actividades y resultados: censo preliminar y recomendaciones para el manejo de una población natural de Saguinus leucopus en la zona de influencia del Proyecto Hidroeléctrico La Miel II. Unpublished manuscript. Google Scholar

  4. C. A. Cuartas-Calle 2001. Partial distribution of tamarins (Saguinus leucopus, Callitrichidae) in Departamento de Antioquia, Colombia. Neotrop. Primates 9:107–111. Google Scholar

  5. C. Freese 1975. A census of nonhuman primates in Peru. Report to the National Academy of Sciences, Project AMOR-0719, Washington, DC. Google Scholar

  6. C. H. Freese, M. A. Freese, and N. Castro . 1977. The status of callitrichids in Peru. In Biology and Conservation of the Callitrichidae. D. G. Kleiman , editor. (ed.), pp. 121–130.Smithsonian Institution Press. Washington, DC. Google Scholar

  7. C. H. Freese, P. G. Heltne, N. Castro, and G. Whitesides . 1982. Patterns and determinants of monkey densities in Peru and Bolivia with notes on distributions. Int. J. Primatol 3:53–59. Google Scholar

  8. P. Hershkovitz 1977. Living New World Monkeys (Platyrrhini): With an Introduction to Primates. Vol. 1.University of Chicago Press. Chicago. Google Scholar

  9. IUCN 2001. IUCN Red List Categories: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC). Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK. Google Scholar

  10. K. Izawa 1978. A field study of the ecology and behavior of the black-mantle tamarin (Saguinus nigricollis). Primates 19:241–274. Google Scholar

  11. C. Janson and J. Terborgh . 1985. Censando primates en el bosque lluvioso, con referencia a la Estación Biológica de Cocha Cashu, Parque Nacional de Manu. Capítulo 15, Centro de Datos para la Conservación, Universidad Nacional Agraria. La Molina, Peru. Google Scholar

  12. P. Kessler 1995. Revierverhalten, nahrungsstrategie und habitatpraferenzen des Rothändtamarins (Saguinus midas midas) in Franzosish-Guayana. Diplomarbeit Anthropologisches Institut und Museum der Universität Zürich. Zürich. Google Scholar

  13. C. E. Kostrub 1997. Preliminary field observations of golden-mantled tamarins, Saguinus tripartitus, in eastern Ecuador. Neotrop. Primates 5:4102–103. Google Scholar

  14. N. A. Muckenhirn, S. Mortenson, S. Vessey, C. E O. Fraser, and B. Singh . 1975. Report on a primate survey in Guyana. PanAmerican Health Organization. Washington, DC. Google Scholar

  15. C. A. Peres 1999. Effects of hunting and habitat quality on Amazonian primate communities. In Primate Communities. J. G. Fleagle, C. Janson, and K. E. Reed , editors. (eds.), pp. 55–74.Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. Google Scholar

  16. C. A. Peres 2000. Territorial defense and the ecology of group movements in small-bodied neotropical primates. In On the Move: How and Why Animals Travel in Groups. S. Boinski and P. A. Garber , editors. (eds.), pp. 100–123.University of Chicago Press. Chicago. Google Scholar

  17. K. Poveda 2000. Uso de hábitat de dos grupos de tití de pies blancos (Saguinus leucopus) en Mariquita, Colombia. Bachelor's thesis. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Bogotá, DC. Google Scholar

  18. A. B. Rylands, H. Schneider, A. Langguth, R. A. Mittermeier, C. P. Groves, and E. Rodríguez-Luna . 2000. An assessment of the diversity of New World primates. Neotrop. Primates 8:261–93. Google Scholar

  19. C. Snowdon and P. Soini . 1988. The tamarins, genus Saguinus. In Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates. Vol. 2: R. A. Mittermeier, A. B. Rylands, A. F. Coimbra-Filho, and G. A B. da Fonseca , editors. (eds.), pp. 223–298.World Wildlife Fund – US. Washington, DC. Google Scholar

  20. P. Soini 1987. Ecology of the saddle-back tamarin Saguinus fuscicollis illigeri on the Rio Pacaya, northeastern Perú. Folia Primatol 49:11–32. Google Scholar

  21. R. W. Sussman and W. G. Kinzey . 1984. The ecological role of the Callitrichidae: A Review. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol 64:419–449. Google Scholar

  22. J. Terborgh 1983. Five New World Primates: A Study in Comparative Ecology. Princeton University Press. Princeton, NJ. Google Scholar

  23. T. N. Vargas and C. I. Solano . 1996. Evaluación del estado de dos poblaciones de Saguinus leucopus para determinar areas potenciales de conservación en un sector del Valle del Magdalena Medio, Colombia. Neotrop. Primates 4:113–15. Google Scholar

  24. C. Veracini 2000. Dados preliminares sobre a ecología de Saguinus niger na Estação Científica Ferreira Penna, Caxiuanã, Pará, Brasil. Neotrop. Primates 8:3108–113. Google Scholar

Notes

[1] Erwin Palacios, Adriana Rodríguez and Claudia Castillo, Conservation International Colombia, Bogotá DC, Colombia, e-mails: <epalacios@conservation.org>, <arodriguez@conservation.org>; <clauscas@hotmail.com>.

Erwin Palacios, Adriana Rodríguez, and Claudia Castillo "Preliminary Observations on the Mottledface Tamarin (Saguinus inustus) on the Lower Río Caquetá, Colombian Amazonia," Neotropical Primates 12(3), (1 December 2004). https://doi.org/10.1896/1413-4705.12.3.123
Published: 1 December 2004
JOURNAL ARTICLE
4 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top