Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 April 2008 Permian brachiopods from the Mizukoshi Formation, central Kyushu, SW Japan: Systematics, palaeobiogeography and tectonic implications
Jun-Ichi Tazawa
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

This study describes a brachiopod fauna, consisting of 22 species in 19 genera, from the Upper Permian (Lopingian) Mizukoshi Formation in the Mizukoshi area of central Kyushu, southwest Japan. The fauna includes three new species: Anidanthus mizukoshiensis, Terrakea yanagidai and Rhynchopora matsumotoi. The Mizukoshi fauna is a Boreal-Tethyan mixed fauna allied with the Middle Permian brachiopod faunas of central Japan (Hida Gaien Belt), northeast Japan (South Kitakami Belt) and eastern Russia (South Primorye). Palaeobiogeographical data on the Mizukoshi fauna suggest that during the Middle-Late Permian the Mizukoshi area was located between the Hida Gaien region to the north and the South Kitakami region to the south, bordering the eastern margin of North China (Sino-Korea). This conclusion supports a strikeslip model that describes largescale sinistral strikeslip movement along the Tanakura Tectonic Line (TTL)-Median Tectonic Line (MTL) from the Early Cretaceous to Palaeogene.

Introduction

The Mizukoshi area, located approximately 20 km SE of Kumamoto, central Kyushu, southwest Japan (Figure 1), is one of the most famous Permian brachiopod fossil localities in Japan. Yanagida (1963) described the following three brachiopod species from the upper part of the Mizukoshi Formation in this area: Linoproductus cf. lineatus (Waagen), Neospirifer fasciger Keyserling and Spiriferella keilhavii (von Buch). Yanagida noted that the Mizukoshi fauna is comparable in specific composition to the Middle and Upper Permian brachiopod faunas of the lower Kanokura Formation in the South Kitakami Belt, northeast Japan; the Maizuru Group in the Maizuru Belt, southwest Japan; the Chandalaz Formation in South Primorye, Far East Russia; and the upper Toman Formation (= Kaishantun Formation) in eastern Jilin Province, Northeast China. On the basis of this work, Nakamura and Tazawa (1990) treated the Mizukoshi fauna as a Boreal-Tethyan mixed fauna, as with the Middle Permian brachiopod faunas of the South Kitakami, Hida Gaien, South Primorye and Jilin regions.

Figure 1.

Index map showing the study area and the fossil localities MZ-S1 and MZ-S2 (using the topographical map of “Mifune” scale 1:25,000 published by the Geographical Survey Institute of Japan).

i1342-8144-12-1-37-f01.gif

Tazawa (1993) proposed a tectonic model of Japan, the strike-slip model, which involved large-scale sinistral strike-slip movement from the Early Cretaceous to Palaeogene. According to Tazawa (2001a, 2004), the sinistral strike-slip movement generated 1,500–2,000 km of displacement along the Tanakura Tectonic Line (TTL)-Median Tectonic Line (MTL) and a marked rearrangement of the pre-Cretaceous terranes of Japan. Given the specifics of this hypothesis, it was expected that the Mizukoshi Formation, with its Boreal-Tethyan mixed brachiopod fauna, would provide important evidence for the strike-slip model as the link between the Permian rocks of the Hida Gaien Belt and the South Kitakami Belt; however, investigation by Yanagida (1963) and Tazawa and Hasegawa (2007) revealed only three species within the Mizukoshi fauna, making it too poor to provide meaningful evidence relevant to the strike-slip model.

With the help of a student (S. Hasegawa), I collected a number of brachiopod specimens from the upper part of the Mizukoshi Formation over the period from 2001 to 2005. The purpose of the present study is to describe all of the available brachiopod material of the Mizukoshi fauna and thereby discuss the age and palaeobiogeography of this fauna and its bearing on the pre-Neogene tectonics of Japan. All of the specimens described in this paper are housed in the following institutions, as indicated by the prefixes assigned to the registered specimen numbers: GK-D, Kyushu University Museum in Fukuoka; NU-B, Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Niigata University in Niigata.

Stratigraphy

Matsumoto and Huzimoto (1939) were the first to recognize fusulinoidean-bearing Permian rocks in the Mizukoshi area, naming the shale-dominated Permian sequence the Mizukoshi Formation. Subsequently, Yanagida (1958) compiled a geological map of this area, and assigned a late Middle Permian age for the Mizukoshi Formation based on some fusulinoideans, Lepidolina cf. gubleri (Kanmera), Lepidolina cf. toriyamai Kanmera and Pseudodoliolina cf. pseudolepida (Deprat), etc., recovered from limestone blocks enclosed in the shales within the upper part of the formation.

More recently, Tazawa and Hasegawa (2007) clarified the stratigraphy of the Mizukoshi Formation. The Mizukoshi Formation is distributed throughout the Mizukoshi area, with a general ENE-WSW trend and dip toward the NNW. The formation is approximately 1,690 m in total thickness and is composed chiefly of black shale with intercalated sandstone and conglomerate, and limestone blocks (Figure 2). The black shale is lithologically similar to shales of the Upper Permian Toyoma Formation (Onuki, 1969) in the South Kitakami Belt, northeast Japan, and the upper part of the Moribu Formation (Tazawa, 2001b) in the Hida Gaien Belt, central Japan. The conglomerate in the upper part of the formation is correlated with the Usuginu-type conglomerate of the South Kitakami Belt on the basis of lithology (Kano, 1967) and the K-Ar hornblende ages (260 ± 13 Ma) of granitic clasts (Tobe et al., 2000). Brachiopods occur as reworked fossils from thin beds of sandy shale and calcareous sandstone within thick shales in the upper part of this formation. The lithology and topographic and stratigraphic details of the fossil localities MZ-S1 and MZ-S2 are as follows (see also Figures 1, 2).

Figure 2.

Generalized columnar section of the Mizukoshi Formation, showing the fossil horizons MZ-S1 and MZ-S2 (adapted from Tazawa and Hasegawa, 2007).

i1342-8144-12-1-37-f02.gif
  • MZ-S1: Grey to light-brown sandy shale, 250 m above the thick sandstone of the upper part of the Mizukoshi Formation, exposed at a road-cutting along Root 219 (Yokono-Yabe Line) between Kanmegi and Mizukoshi and approximately 500 m SW of Tsuzumugi (Lat. 32°41′47″N, Long. 130°51′30″E). All of the brachiopod specimens described by Yanagida (1963) and Tazawa and Hasegawa (2007) were collected from this locality.

  • MZ-S2: rey sandy shale and dark-grey calcareous fine-grained sandstone, 80 m above the thick sandstone of the upper part of the Mizukoshi Formation, exposed within the western slope of a small tributary located approximately 500 m S of Tsuzumugi and 270 m SE of MZ-S1 (Lat. 32°41′41″N, Long. 130°51′39″E).

The Mizukoshi fauna

The brachiopod fauna described herein includes the following 22 species in 19 genera: Neochonetes (Zhongyingia) zhongyingensis Liao, Kitakamichonetes multicapillatus Afanasjeva and Tazawa, Capillomesolobus sp., Transennatia gratiosa (Waagen), Waagenoconcha krystofovichi (Fredericks), Waagenoconcha permocarbonica Ustritsky, Anidanthus ussuricus (Fredericks), Anidanthus mizukoshiensis sp. nov., Terrakea yanagidai sp. nov., Yakovlevia kaluzinensis Fredericks, Urushtenoidea crenulata (Ting), Permianella typica He and Zhu, Derbyia nipponica Nakamura, Acosarina cf. circular Xu, Orthotichia sp., Hustedia ratburiensis Waterhouse and Piyasin, Rhynchopora matsumotoi sp. nov., Rhynchopora sp., Gypospirifer volatilis Duan and Li, Alispiriferella lita (Fredericks), Elivina sp. and Dielasma sp. (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Brachiopod species of the Mizukoshi fauna and their occurrences in South Kitakami (Setamai, Kamiyasse-Imo and Takakurayama), Hida Gaien (Moribu and Oguradani), South Primorye (Vladivostok and Nakhodka), Northeast China (Jilin and Heilongjiang) and Inner Mongolia (Zhesi and Xiujimqinqi). Open circle is the Boreal (bipolar) species, and solid circle is the Tethyan species.

i1342-8144-12-1-37-f03.gif

Age and correlation

Brachiopods of the Mizukoshi fauna consist mostly of Middle Permian elements, although with some Late Permian genera and species. Neochonetes (Zhongyingia) zhongyingensis is known from the Upper Permian (Wuchiapingian) of Hunan, South China, and the Upper Permian (Lopingian) of Guizhou, South China. Acosarina cf. circular resembles A. circular, which occurs in the Upper Permian (Wuchiapingian) of Hunan, South China. It is noteworthy that all of the brachiopod fossils were reworked, probably by turbidity currents, in the Late Permian, as originally suggested by Yanagida (1958).

The following fusulinoideans and smaller foraminifers are found within limestone cobbles of the conglomerate in the upper part of the Mizukoshi Formation: Rauserella sp., Codonofusiella sp., Danbarula cascadensis (Thompson, Wheeler and Danner), Lantschichites cuniculata (Kanmera), Nankinella sp. Chusenella choshiensis Chisaka, Metadoliolina gravitesta (Kanmera), Lepidolina multiseptata (Deprat), Lepidolina shiraiwensis (Ozawa), Lepidolina kumaensis Kanmera and Colaniella sp. It is remarkable that most of the fusulinoideans are late Middle Permian (Capitanian) elements, and that the smaller foraminifer Colaniella mostly indicates a Wuchiapingian age, although it occurs also from Guadalupian beds. On the basis of these foraminifers, the age of the Mizukoshi Formation is considered to be Late Permian (Lopingian), probably Wuchiapingian, because all the foraminifers occur as reworked fossils from limestone clasts of conglomerate.

Furthermore, the K-Ar hornblende ages (260 ±13 Ma) of granitic clasts within the conglomerate in the Mizukoshi Formation indicates that the age of the conglomerate is younger than the late Middle Permian. The evidence provided by the age of the granitic clasts supports the above conclusion that a Late Permian (Lopingian), probably Wuchiapingian age can be attributed to the Mizukoshi Formation.

Palaeobiogeography and tectonic implication

Among the brachiopods listed above, Kitakamichonetes, Waagenoconcha, Anidanthus, Terrakea, Yakovlevia, Rhynchopora, Gypospirifer, Alispiriferella and Elivina are Boreal (including bipolar)-type genera, whereas Neochonetes (Zongyingia), Transennatia, Urushtenoidea, Permianella and Acosarina are Tethyan-type genera (see Figure 3); consequently, the Mizukoshi fauna is a typical Boreal-Tethyan mixed fauna, although the Boreal types are predominant. In terms of generic and specific composition, the Mizukoshi fauna has a close affinity with the Permian brachiopod faunas of northeast Japan (Setamai, Kamiyasse-Imo and Takakurayama in the South Kitakami Belt), central Japan (Moribu and Oguradani in the Hida Gaien Belt), eastern Russia (South Primorye), Northeast China (Jilin and Heilongjiang) and North China (Inner Mongolia), particularly those of the South Kitakami, Hida Gaien and South Primorye regions. All of these regions are included within the Southern Subzone of the Inner Mongolia-Japan Transitional Zone of Tazawa (1991). This subzone was probably a continental shelf bordering the northern and eastern margins of North China (Sino-Korea), located in the northern mid-latitudes during the Middle to Late Permian (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Middle-Late Permian reconstruction map of the world (adapted from Ziegler et al., 1997). Black areas are continental shelf or continental slope. AF: Africa, AN: Antarctica, AR: Arabia, AU: Australia, E: Eurasia, G: Greenland, IC: Indochina, IN: India, L: Lhasa, M: Mongolia, NA: North America, NC: North China, Q: Qiangtang, SA: South America, SC: South China, SI: Sibumasu, T: Tarim.

i1342-8144-12-1-37-f04.gif

The above data strongly suggest that the Mizukoshi Formation is the SW extension of the Permian rocks of the Hida Gaien Belt, thereby belonging to the South Kitakami Terrane which is characterised by Permian continental-shelf sediments with Boreal-Tethyan mixed faunas. The dominant Boreal-type assemblage in the Mizukoshi fauna indicates that during the Middle-Late Permian the Mizukoshi area was probably located between the Hida Gaien Belt to the north and the South Kitakami Belt to the south. A reconstruction of Middle-Late Permian Japan shows clearly that large-scale sinistral strike-slip faulting occurred subsequent to the Permian. This finding is in agreement with the strike-slip model proposed by Tazawa (1993, 2004), which describes large-scale (approximately 1,500–2,000 km of displacement) sinistral strike-slip faulting along the TTL-MTL during the Early Cretaceous to Palaeogene (Figure 5). The Mizukoshi fauna provides compelling evidence of large-scale sinistral strike-slip movement in Japan.

Figure 5.

Tectonic map of Japan in the present and the Early Cretaceous, showing the distribution of the Permian brachiopod faunas in the South Kitakami Terrane. Solid black arrow shows the direction of strike-slip motion. MTL: Median Tectonic Line, TTL: Tanakura Tectonic Line, 1: South Kitakami Terrane, 2: Akiyoshi Terrane, 3: Mino Terrane, 4: Shimanto Terrane, 5: Hida Nappe (made from Tazawa, 2007).

i1342-8144-12-1-37-f05.gif

Systematic descriptions

Order Productida Sarytcheva and Sokolskaya, 1959

Suborder Chonetidina Muir-Wood, 1955

Superfamily Chonetoidea Bronn, 1862

Family Rugosochonetidae Muir-Wood, 1962

Subfamily Rugosochonetinae Muir-Wood, 1962

Genus Neochonetes Muir-Wood, 1962

Subgenus Neochonetes (Zhongyingia) Shen and Archbold, 2002

Type species.Neochonetes zhongyingensis Liao, 1980.

Neochonetes (Zhongyingia) zhongyingensis Liao, 1980 Figures 6.1a–6.2b

Figure 6.

1a–2b. Neochonetes (Zhongyingia) zhongyingensis Liao, 1a, 1b, 1c: external mould and latex cast of a ventral valve, NU-B1007, (1b, 1c ×2), 2a, 2b: internal mould of a dorsal valve, NU-B1021, (2b ×2), 3a–4b. Kitakamichonetes multicapillatus Afanasjeva and Tazawa, 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d: external mould, external latex cast, internal mould and internal latex cast of a ventral valve, NU-B1031, 4a, 4b: external mould and latex cast of a ventral valve, NU-B1033, 5a, 5b. Capillomesolobus sp., internal mould of a ventral valve, NU-B1030, (5b ×2), 6a–7b. Transennatia gratiosa (Waagen), 6a, 6b, 6c, 6d, 6e: ventral, posterior, anterior and lateral views of internal mould of a ventral valve, NU-B767, (6a–6e ×2), 7a, 7b: internal mould of a ventral valve, NU-B769, (7b ×2), 8a–12b. Waagenoconcha permocarbonica Ustritsky, 8a, 8b, 8c: ventral external latex cast, ventral internal mould and dorsal internal mould of a composite valve, NU-B866, 9: internal latex cast of a dorsal valve, NU-B869, 10a, 10b: ventral and dorsal views of internal mould of a composite valve, NU-B870, 11: external mould of a dorsal valve, NU-B880, 12a, 12b: internal mould and latex cast of a dorsal valve, NU-B892. (Natural size unless otherwise indicated).

i1342-8144-12-1-37-f06.gif

Material.—Twenty-five specimens from locality MZ-S2: (1) external moulds of five ventral valves, NU-B1005–1009; (2) internal moulds of nine ventral valves, NU-B1010–1018; (3) external and internal moulds of two dorsal valves, NU-B1019, 1020; (4) internal moulds of nine dorsal valves, NU-B1021–1029.

Description.—Shell medium size for genus, transversely trapezoidal in outline; widest at hinge; cardinal extremities extended; length 11 mm, width 17 mm in the largest specimen (NU-B1007). Ventral valve moderately convex in lateral profile; umbo small; ears large, acute; sulcus broad and shallow, beginning from anterior to umbo, rapidly widening anteriorly. Dorsal valve gently concave in lateral profile; ears large, flat; fold low and broad. External surface of both valves ornamented by numerous weak capillae and irregular growth lines; 4–5 capillae in 1 mm at anterior margin of ventral valve. Internal structures are obscure.

Remarks.—These specimens are referred to Neochonetes (Zhongyingia) zhongyingensis Liao, 1980, originally described from the Longtan and Changhsingian beds of Guizhou, South China, on account of size, shape and external ornament of both valves, although the Mizukoshi specimens have weaker capillae than the Chinese material (see Shen and Archbold, 2002, figs. 4D, 4E, 4K, 4L. 4O).

Neochonetes (Zhongyingia) linshuiensis Campi and Shi (2005, p. 282, figs. 4B–4F, 4H, 4P–4R), from the Changhsingian of Sichuan, South China, differs from N. (Z.) zhongyingensis in its smaller size and in having coarser capillae on the ventral valve.

Distribution.—Upper Permian (Wuchiapingian) of South China (Hunan); Upper Permian (Lopingian) of South China (Guizhou) and southwest Japan (Mizukoshi).

Subfamily Chalimochonetinae Afanasjeva, 1988

Genus Kitakamichonetes Afanasjeva and Tazawa, 2007

Type species.—Kitakamichonetes multicapillatus Afanasjeva and Tazawa, 2007.

Kitakamichonetes multicapillatus Afanasjeva and Tazawa, 2007 Figures 6.3a–6.4b

Material.—Six specimens from locality MZ-S2: (1) external and internal moulds of a ventral valve, NU-B1031; (2) external moulds of three ventral valves, NU-B1032–1034; (3) external moulds of two dorsal valves, NU-B1035, 1036.

Description.—Shell medium size for genus, transversely trapezoidal to semicircular in outline; cardinal extremities acute; widest at hinge; length 18 mm, width 41 mm in the best preserved specimen (NU-B1031). Ventral valve gently convex in lateral profile; umbo small; ears large, triangular in shape and pointed; sulcus wide and shallow, arising at umbo and fairly broad near front margin. Dorsal valve slightly concave in lateral profile; fold wide and low, very weakly developed. External surface of both valves ornamented with numerous capillae and very weak, irregular concentric rugae; capillae numbering 4–5 in 1 mm near anterior margin of ventral valve. Ventral interior with long median septum, a pair of teeth and large muscle field. Other internal structures are obscure.

Remarks.—The Mizukoshi specimens are referred to Kitakamichonetes multicapillatus Afanasjeva and Tazawa, 2007, described from the Middle Permian Kanokura Formation of the South Kitakami Belt, northeast Japan in size, shape and surface ornamentation of the shells, especially in their enormously large size.

Comparison with other chonetid species has been fully discussed by Afanasjeva and Tazawa (2007, p. 73).

Distribution.—Middle Permian (Wordian-Capitanian) of northeast Japan (South Kitakami Belt); Upper Permian (Lopingian) of southwest Japan (Mizukoshi).

Subfamily Capillomesolobinae Pečar, 1986

Genus Capillomesolobus Pečar, 1986

Type species.—Capillomesolobus karavankensis Pečar, 1986.

Capillomesolobus sp. Figures 6.5a, 6.5b

Material.—One specimen from locality MZ-S2, external and internal moulds of a ventral valve, NU-B1030.

Remarks.—The single specimen from Mizukoshi is safely assigned to the genus Capillomesolobus by its small, wider subrectangular ventral valve (length 8 mm, width 9 mm), ornamented by numerous capillae (4–5 per 1 mm at the anterior margin of the valve), and by having a sulcus with a median lobe. This specimen most resembles Mesolobus sp. Tazawa (1979, p. 25, pl. 4, figs. 2a, 2b) from the Kanokura Formation of Matsukawa in the Kesennuma area, South Kitakami Belt and Capillomesolobus sp. Tazawa (2001b, p. 289, figs. 6.8a–6.10) from the Moribu Formation of the Moribu area, Hida Gaien Belt, in size, outline and external ornament of the ventral valve.

The shells described or figured from the Lower and Middle Permian of the South Kitakami Belt, northeast Japan as Chonetes sinuosa Schellwien, 1892 by Hayasaka (1925, p. 93, pl. 5, figs. 5, 6), Mesolobus mesolobus (Norwood and Pratten, 1855) by Nakamura (1959, p. 205, pl. 2, figs. 2, 3) and Mesolobus sinuosa (Schellwien, 1892) by Tazawa (1976, pl. 2, fig. 12) are clearly distinguished from the Mizukoshi species in their much larger dimensions.

Suborder Productidina Waagen, 1883

Superfamily Productoidea Gray, 1840

Family Productellidae Schuchert, 1929

Subfamily Marginiferinae Stehli, 1954

Tribe Paucispiniferini Muir-Wood and Cooper, 1960

Genus Transennatia Waterhouse, 1975

Type species.Productus gratiosus Waagen, 1884.

Transennatia gratiosa (Waagen, 1884) Figures 6.6a–6.7b

Material.—Five specimens from locality MZ-S2: (1) external and internal moulds of a ventral valve, NU-B767; (2) internal moulds of two ventral valves, NU-B768, 769; (3) external moulds of two dorsal valves, NU-B770, 771.

Description.—Shell small for genus, transversely subquadrate in outline, widest at hinge; length 13 mm, width 20 mm in the largest specimen (NU-B768). Ventral valve strongly and unevenly convex in lateral profile, most convex at umbonal region, strongly geniculated at anterior margin of visceral disc, with long trail; umbo small, slightly incurved; ears small, pointed; sulcus narrow and low; lateral slopes steep. Dorsal valve almost flat on visceral disc, geniculated at anterior margin of visceral disc, followed by short trail; fold narrow and low. External surface of ventral valve reticulate on visceral disc and costate on trail; costae converging into sulcus anteriorly, having a density of 7–8 per 5 mm at midvalve; spines or spine bases not observed. External ornament of dorsal valve similar to that of the opposite valve. Interior of both valves not well preserved and obscure.

Remarks.—These specimens are referred to Transennatia gratiosa (Waagen, 1884), on the basis of their small size, strongly convex ventral valve and reticulate ornament on the disks of both valves. The Mizukoshi specimens are smaller than the Salt Range specimens, and most resemble the smaller shells of T. gratiosa from the Middle Permian (Wordian) of the Ise and Moribu areas, Hida Gaien Belt, central Japan (Tazawa and Matsumoto, 1998; Tazawa, 2001b) and the Kesennuma and Setamai areas, South Kitakami Belt, northeast Japan (Hayasaka, 1960; Tazawa and Ibaraki, 2001).

Transennatia insculpta (Grant, 1976, p. 135, pl. 32, figs. 1–37; pl. 33, figs. 1–16) from the Rat Buri Limestone of Ko Muk, southern Thailand is close to T. gratiosa in general appearance, but it has a wider shell and more prominent ears.

Distribution.—Middle Permian (Wordian-Capitanian) of Nepal (Kumaon Himalayas), Cambodia (Sisophon), Vietnam (Quang Tri), South China (Guangxi, Hubei and Shaanxi), Northeast China (Jilin and Heilongjiang), eastern Russia (South Primorye) and Japan (Hida Gaien and South Kitakami Belts); Middle Permian (Wordian) to Upper Permian (Wuchiapingian) of Pakistan (Salt Range); Upper Permian (Wuchiapingian) of South China (Yunnan, Sichuan, Guizhou, Guangdong, Hunan, Hubei, Jiangxi, Zhejiang and Anhui); Upper Permian (Lopingian) of southwest Japan (Mizukoshi).

Superfamily Echinoconchoidea Stehli, 1954

Family Echinoconchidae Stehli, 1954

Subfamily Juresaniinae Muir-Wood and Cooper, 1960

Tribe Waagenoconchini Muir-Wood and Cooper, 1960

Genus Waagenoconcha Chao, 1927

Type species.Productus humboldti d’Orbigny, 1842.

Waagenoconcha krystofovichi (Fredericks, 1925) Figures 7.17a–7.18c

Figure 7.

1a–5. Anidanthus ussuricus (Fredericks), 1a, 1b: ventral and dorsal views of internal mould of a conjoined valve, NU-B732, 2a, 2b, 2c: posterior, anterior and lateral views of internal mould of a conjoined valve, NU-B735, 3: internal mould of a dorsal valve, NU-B738, 4: external mould of a dorsal valve, NU-B737, 5: external mould of a dorsal valve, NU-B736, 6a–8e. Anidanthus mizukoshiensis sp. nov., 6a, 6b: external mould of a dorsal valve, NU-B776, (6b ×2), 7a, 7b: external mould of a dorsal valve, NU-B777, (7b ×2), 8a, 8b, 8c, 8d, 8e: ventral and dorsal views of internal mould of a conjoined valve and external mould of a dorsal valve, NU-B775 (holotype), (8b, 8c, 8e ×2), 9a–13. Terrakea yanagidai sp. nov., 9a, 9b, 9c, 9d: ventral, posterior, anterior and lateral views of internal mould of a ventral valve, NU-B778 (holotype), 10a, 10b, 10c, 10d: ventral, posterior, anterior and lateral views of internal mould of a ventral valve, NU-B787, 11: external latex cast of a ventral valve, NU-B781, 12: external latex cast of a ventral valve, NU-B779, 13: external mould of a dorsal valve, NU-B852, 14. Yakovlevia kaluzinensis Fredericks, internal mould of a ventral valve, NU-B774, 15a–16. Urushtenoidea crenulata (Ting), 15a, 15b: external cast of a ventral valve, NU-B773, (15b ×2), 16: internal mould of a ventral valve, NU-B772, 17a–18c. Waagenoconcha krystofovichi (Fredericks), 17a, 17b: internal mould and external latex cast of a ventral valve, NU-B896, 18a, 18b, 18c: ventral, anterior and lateral views of internal mould of a ventral valve, NU-B898. (Natural size unless otherwise indicated).

i1342-8144-12-1-37-f07.gif

Material.—Seven specimens from locality MZ-S2: (1) external and internal moulds of two ventral valves, NU-B896, 897; (2) internal moulds of five ventral valves, NU-B898–902.

Description.—Shell small for genus, elongate subrectangular in outline, with greatest width slightly anterior to midvalve; length about 43 mm, width 33 mm in the largest specimen (NU-B898). Ventral valve strongly convex in lateral profile; umbo large, incurved; hinge nearly straight, slightly shorter than greatest width of valve; ears small, triangular; sulcus narrow and deep; lateral slopes steep. External surface of ventral valve ornamented with numerous, elongate, quincuncially arranged spine bases on venter, and smaller, rounded spine bases on umbonal slopes; several faint radial folds on lateral slopes. Ventral interior with small, elongate, faintly dendritic adductor scars and large, striated diductor scars on posterior one third of valve.

Remarks.—These specimens are referred to Waagenoconcha krystofovichi (Fredericks, 1925) from the Chandalaz Formation of Cape Kalouzin in the Vladivostok area, South Primorye, eastern Russia, on account of size, shape and external ornament of the ventral valve, especially in having radial folds on ventral lateral slopes.

Waagenoconcha purdoni (Davidson, 1862) from the Chhidru Formation of the Salt Range is similar in general shape and external ornament of the ventral valve, but it has a much larger and less convex ventral valve (see Waagen, 1884, pl. 73, figs. 1–3).

Distribution.—Middle Permian (Capitanian) of South Primorye, eastern Russia; Upper Permian (Lopingian) of Mizukoshi, southwest Japan.

Waagenoconcha permocarbonica Ustritsky in Ustritsky and Tschernjak, 1963 Figures 6.8a–6.12b

Material.—Thirty specimens from locality MZ-S2: (1) external mould of a conjoined valve, NU-B865; (2) external moulds of two ventral valves and associated internal mould of the conjoined valve, NU-B866, 867; (3) internal moulds of three conjoined valves, NU-B868-870; (4) external mouds of two ventral valves, NU-B871, 872; (5) internal moulds of four ventral valves, NU-B873-876; (6) external and internal moulds of two dorsal valves, NU-B877, 878; (7) external moulds of twelve dorsal valves, NU-B879-890; (8) internal moulds of four dorsal valves, NU-B891-894.

Description.—Shell large for genus, transversely subrectangular in outline, with greatest width slightly anterior to midvalve; length 33 mm, width about 54 mm in the largest specimen (NU-B874). Ventral valve strongly convex in both lateral and anterior profiles; umbo small, incurved; hinge slightly shorter than widest part at about midvalve; ears inconspicuous; cardinal extremities rounded; lateral slopes steep; sulcus moderately developed, commencing at about 10 mm from umbo, deepest at midvalve, and becoming shallower and wider toward anterior margin. Dorsal valve with flattened to slightly inflated and rounded visceral disc, strongly geniculated at anterolateral margins, and followed by short trail. External surface of ventral valve ornamented by irregular concentric rugae and numerous, quincuncially arranged spine bases; spine bases becoming fine at anterolateral parts; numbering 6–7 in 5 mm at midvalve, 14–16 in 5 mm near anterior margin. External ornament of dorsal valve similar to that of opposite valve. Ventral interior with small, elongate, posteriorly smooth and anteriorly dendritic adductor scars and large, flabellate, striated diductor scars. Dorsal interior with trilobed cardinal process followed by thick, long median septum, extending to about midvalve; adductor scars elongate oval in shape and dendritic.

Remarks.—These specimens are referred to Waagenoconcha permocarbonica Ustritsky, 1963, originally described by Ustritsky (in Ustritsky and Tschernjak, 1963) from the Bashkirian to the Sakmarian of Taimyr, on account of size, shape and external ornament of both valves.

Waagenoconcha waageni (Rothpletz, 1892) from the Middle Permian of Timor is close in general outline, but it has more numerous and stronger concentric rugae and coarser spine bases on the ventral valve (see Archbold and Bird, 1989, figs. 3C, 3D).

Waagenoconcha imperfecta Prendergast (1935, p. 15, pl. 4, figs. 1–3), from the Upper Permian (Wuchiapingian) of the Canning Basin, western Australia, differs from the present species in having very fine and closely arranged spine bases on both valves.

Waagenoconcha abichi (Waagen, 1884, p. 697, pl. 74, figs. 1–7) from the Middle Permian (Capitanian) Wargal Formation and the Upper Permian (Wuchiapingian-Changhsingian) Chhidru Formation of the Salt Range, is clearly distinguished from the present species by its smaller size and much coarser spine bases on the ventral valve.

Distribution.—Middle Carboniferous (Bashkirian) to Lower Permian (Sakmarian) of northern Russia (Taimyr); Lower Permian (Sakmarian) of western Canada (Yukon Territory); Middle Permian (Roadian to Wordian) of North China (Inner Mongolia) and central Japan (Hida Gaien Belt); Upper Permian (Lopingian) of southwest Japan (Mizukoshi).

Superfamily Linoproductoidea Stehli, 1954

Family Linoproductidae Stehli, 1954

Subfamily Anidanthinae Waterhouse, 1968b

Genus Anidanthus Hill, 1950

Type species.—Linoproductus springsurensis Booker, 1932.

Anidanthus ussuricus (Fredericks, 1924) Figures 7.1a–7.5

Material.—Seven specimens from locality MZ-S1: (1) internal moulds of two conjoined valves, NU-B732, 733; (2) internal mould of two ventral valves, NU-B734, 735; (3) external moulds of three dorsal valves, NU-B736–738.

Description.—Shell large for genus, transversely subquadrate in outline; hinge straight, equal to greatest width; length 9 mm, width about 34 mm in the largest ventral valve specimen (NU-B733); length 18 mm, width about 35 mm in the largest dorsal valve specimen (NU-B736). Ventral valve highly convex in both lateral and anterior profiles, with long trail; umbo tapering, pointed and strongly incurved beyond hinge; ears small; sulcus broad and shallow; flanks steep. Dorsal valve slightly concave on venter, strongly geniculated and followed by long trail; ears large, prominent and almost flattened; fold broad and low. External ornament of ventral valve obscure, but numerous capillae faintly observed. Dorsal valve ornamented by strong concentric lamellae and numerous capillae over visceral disc; lamellae only on ears; numbering 4 lamellae in 5 mm, and 7–8 capillae in 5 mm at about midvalve.

Remarks.—These specimens are poorly preserved and severely deformed but can be safely referred to Anidanthus ussuricus (Fredericks, 1924), originally described from the Chandalaz Formation of the Vladivostok area, South Primorye, Far East Russia by their large size and extremely developed long trail on both valves. The linoproductid shells, described and figured by Yanagida (1963, p. 74, pl. 10, figs. 8–14) as Linoproductus cf. lineatus (Waagen, 1884) from the same locality MZ-S1 of Mizukoshi, are probably conspecific with the present species by their strongly convex ventral valves with long trails. Stepanov (1935, p. 56) established the genus Pseudomarginifera with the present species, Productus ussuricus Fredericks, 1924, as type species. However, I tentatively treat Pseudomarginifera as a junior synonym of Anidanthus, owing to the poor state of preservation of both Frederick’s and the Mizukoshi specimens.

The type species, Anidanthus springsurensis (Booker, 1932) from the Cattle Creek Formation of Queensland, eastern Australia, differs from A. ussuricus in its much smaller size.

Distribution.—Middle Permian (Wordian-Capitanian) of North China (Zhesi and Xiujimqinqi, Inner Mongolia), Northeast China (Jilin) and eastern Russia (Vladivostok and Nakhodka, South Primorye); Upper Permian (Lopingian) of northeast Japan (Takakurayama in the Abukuma Mountains) and southwest Japan (Mizukoshi).

Anidanthus mizukoshiensis sp. nov. Figures 7.6a–7.8e

Etymology.—Named after the fossil locality, Mizukoshi.

Material.—Three specimens from locality MZ-S2: (1) external mould of a dorsal valve and associated internal mould of conjoined valve, NU-B775 (holotype); (2) external and internal moulds of a dorsal valve, NU-B776; (3) external mould of a dorsal valve, NU-B777.

Diagnosis.—Small, transverse Anidanthus, with fine, numerous costellae on dorsal valve, numbering 11–12 in 5 mm at about midvalve.

Description.—Shell small size for genus, transversely subrectangular in outline, with greatest width along hinge; length about 15 mm, width about 22 mm in the holotype (NU-B775). Ventral valve strongly and unevenly convex in lateral profile, most convex at umbonal region, slightly convex at venter, geniculated near anterior margin of visceral disc, and followed by short trail; umbo small, strongly incurved; sulcus broad and shallow, originating near umbo and extending to anterior margin. Dorsal valve slightly concave, without fold; ears large, prominent and flattened. External surface of dorsal valve ornamented by strong concentric rugae and numerous, fine costellae on visceral disc, rugae only on ears; numbering 6–7 rugae on visceral disc; costellae with a density of 11–12 per 5 mm at about midvalve. Internal structures not clearly observed in the present material.

Remarks.Anidanthus mizukoshiensis n. sp. is distinguished from the type species Anidanthus springsurensis (Booker, 1932) by its smaller and more transverse shell, and having much finer costellae on the dorsal valve.

Anidanthus aagardi (Toula, 1875, p. 235, pl. 7, figs. 2a–2c) from the Middle to Upper Permian (?) of Spitsbergen differs from A. mizukoshiensis in having a less transverse shell.

The preceding described species, Anidanthus ussuricus (Fredericks, 1924), differs from the present species in its much larger size and extremely long trail.

Subfamily Grandaurispininae Lazarev, 1986

Genus Terrakea Booker, 1930

Type species.—Productus brachythaerus Morris, 1845.

Terrakea yanagidai sp. nov. Figures 7.9a–7.13

Etymology.—Named for Prof. Juichi Yanagida.

Material.—Eighty-one specimens from locality MZ-S2: (1) external and internal moulds of a ventral valve, NU-B778 (holotype); (2) external moulds of three ventral valves, NU-B779-781; (3) internal mould of a ventral valve with external mould of the opposite dorsal valve, NU-B782; (4) internal moulds of sixty-seven ventral valves, NU-B783-849; (5) external and internal moulds of a dorsal valve, NU-B850; (6) external moulds of eight dorsal valves, NU-B851-858.

Diagnosis.—Small, transverse Terrakea, having highly arched ventral valve with long trail and flattened dorsal valve, strongly geniculated and followed by short trail.

Description.—Shell small for genus, transversely subrectangular in outline, with greatest width at hinge; length 12 mm, width 28 mm in the holotype (NU-B778); length 15 mm, width about 31 mm in the largest specimen (NU-B784). Ventral valve strongly convex, geniculated and followed by long trail; umbo large, tapering and incurved; venter slightly convex with shallow sulcus; flanks steep; ears small, triangular and clearly demarcated from visceral portion. Dorsal valve flat on visceral disc, strongly and sharply geniculated and followed by short trail. External surface of ventral valve ornamented by costellae and spine bases; costellae fine, numerous, numbering 11–12 in 5 mm at about midvalve; spine bases elongate, quincuncially arranged on venter and trail; erect spines numerous over ears. External surface of dorsal valve ornamented by numerous fine costellae, regular, rather weak rugae, and numerous quincuncially arranged spines. Internally, ventral valve with finely dendritic adductor scars and longitudinally striated diductor scars. Other internal structures are obscure.

Remarks.—The Mizukoshi specimens were first described by Tazawa (2008a) as Terrakea sp. B. This species is distinguished from the type species, T. brachythaera (Morris, 1845) by its much smaller size and fine costellae on the ventral valve.

Terrakea japonica Tazawa (2008b, figs. 3A–3L), from the lower Kanokura Formation (Wordian) of Imo, South Kitakami Belt, northeast Japan, is similar to T. yanagidai, but it differs from the latter in its larger size and stronger costellae on both valves.

Terrakea pollex Hill (1950, p. 20, pl. 9, figs. 6–12) from the Fairyland Member of the Buffel Formation in Cracow Homestead, Queensland, eastern Australia, differs from T. yanagidai in having a shell with a shorter hinge and a rounded oval-shaped dorsal valve with a long trail.

Terrakea borealis Ganelin (in Sarytcheva, 1977, p. 142, pl. 21, figs. 4–8; text-fig. 81) from the Omolonsky Horizon of the Kolyma-Omolon region, northeastern Russia, differs from the present new species in having ears with fewer spines.

Family Yakovleviidae Waterhouse, 1975

Genus Yakovlevia Fredericks, 1925

Type species.Chonetes (Yakovlevia) kaluzinensis Fredericks, 1925.

Yakovlevia kaluzinensis Fredericks, 1925 Figure 7.14

Material.—One specimen from locality MZ-S2, internal mould of a ventral valve, NU-B774.

Remarks.—The Mizukoshi specimen is large in size (length about 43 mm, width about 46 mm), transversely subquadrate in outline, and having a pair of small, elongate subtrigonal adductor scars and two large diductor scars which are striated anteriorly and demarcated by a strong ridge posterolaterally. This specimen is referred to Yakovlevia kaluzinensis Fredericks, 1925, originally described by Fredericks (1925) from the Chandalaz Formation of the Vladivostok area, South Primorye in size, shape and internal structure of the ventral valve. It most resembles the specimens of Y. kaluzinensis, described by Tazawa (2001b, p. 291, figs. 6.20–6.25) from the Moribu Formation of Moribu, Hida Gaien Belt, central Japan.

Distribution.—Middle Permian (Kungurian-Capitanian) of southeastern Mongolia (near Mt. Dzhirem-Ula), eastern Russia (South Primorye) and central Japan (Hida Gaien Belt); Upper Permian (Lopingian) of Mizukoshi, southwest Japan.

Suborder Strophalosiidina Schuchert, 1913

Superfamily Aulostegoidea Muir-Wood and Cooper, 1960

Family Aulostegidae Muir-Wood and Cooper, 1960

Subfamily Chonosteginae Muir-Wood and Cooper, 1960

Genus Urushtenoidea Jin and Hu, 1978

Type species.—Urushtenia chaoi Jin, 1963.

Urushtenoidea crenulata (Ting in Yang et al., 1962) Figures 7.15a–7.16

Material.—Two specimens from locality MZ-S2: (1) external and internal moulds of a ventral valve, NU-B772; (2) external cast of a ventral valve, NU-B773.

Description.—Shell medium size for genus, transversely subquadrate in outline; length about 15 mm, width about 18 mm in the larger specimen (NU-B773). Ventral valve slightly convex in venter, strongly geniculated at right angle, and followed by long trail. External ornament of ventral valve consisting of few weak concentric rugae and costae on visceral disc, numerous strong costae on trail, numbering 6 in 5 mm at middle of trail. Internal structure of ventral valve obscure in the present specimen.

Remarks.—The single ventral valve specimen from Mizukoshi can be referred to Urushtenoidea crenulata (Ting in Yang et al., 1962) in size, shape and external ornament of the ventral valve. This specimen most resembles the ventral valve specimen (NU-B409; Tazawa, 2001b, fig. 7.2) of U. crenulata, described from the lower Moribu Formation of Moribu, Hida Gaien Belt, central Japan.

Distribution.—Middle Permian (Kungurian-Capitanian) of Cambodia (Sisophon), South China (Guizhou, Sichuan, Hunan, Guangdong, Jiangxi, Fujian, Jiangsu, Hubei and Shaanxi), Northwest China (Qinghai and Gansu), and Japan (South Kitakami and Hida Gaien Belts); Upper Permian (Lopingian) of Mizukoshi, southwest Japan.

Suborder Lyttoniidina Williams, Harper and Grant, 2000

Superfamily Permianelloidea He and Zhu, 1979

Family Permianellidae He and Zhu, 1979

Genus Permianella He and Zhu, 1979

Type species.Permianella typica He and Zhu, 1979.

Permianella typica He and Zhu, 1979 Figure 8.1

Figure 8.

1. Permianella typica He and Zhu, internal mould of a dorsal valve, NU-B895, 2a–6b. Hustedia ratburiensis Waterhouse and Piyasin, 2a, 2b, 2c: ventral and dorsal views of internal mould of a conjoined valve, NU-B1037, (2b, 2c ×2), 3: internal mould of a ventral valve, NU-B1045 (×2), 4: internal mould of a ventral valve, NU-B1046 (×2), 5: external latex cast of a dorsal valve, NU-B1047 (×2), 6a, 6b: external latex cast and external mould of a ventral valve, NU-B1040 (×2), 7a–8b. Acosarina cf. circular Xu, 7a, 7b: internal mould of a ventral valve, NU-B861, (7b ×2), 8a, 8b: internal mould of a ventral valve, NU-B863, (8b ×2), 9a, 9b. Orthotichia sp., internal mould of a ventral valve, NU-B864, (9b ×2), 10a–10c. Rhynchopora matsumotoi sp. nov., 10a, 10b, 10c: ventral view of internal mould of a conjoined valve and external latex cast of a dorsal valve, NU-B1052 (holotype), (10b, 10c ×2), 11a, 11b. Rhynchopora sp., internal mould of a ventral valve, NU-B1053, (11b ×2), 12–16c. Derbyia nipponica Nakamura, 12: internal mould of a ventral valve, NU-B905, 13a, 13b, 13c: external mould, external latex cast and internal mould of a ventral valve, NU-B906, 14a, 14b, 14c: external mould, external latex cast and internal mould of a dorsal valve, NU-B911, 15: internal mould of a dorsal valve, NU-B912, 16a, 16b, 16c: external mould, external latex cast and internal mould of a ventral valve, NU-B904. (Natural size unless otherwise indicated).

i1342-8144-12-1-37-f08.gif

Material.—One specimen from locality MZ-S2, internal mould of a dorsal valve, NU-B895.

Remarks.—The material available is lacking the posterior half of the dorsal valve, but it resembles well the specimens of Permianella typica He and Zhu, 1979, described by Shen and Tazawa (1997, p. 288, figs. 2–5), from the lower Kanokura Formation of the southern Kitakami Mountains (South Kitakami Belt), northeast Japan. It is characterized by its large size (length over 25 mm, width 17 mm) and by having a deep anterior incision.

Distribution.—Middle Permian (Wordian-Capitanian) of northeast Japan (South Kitakami Belt) and Malaysia (Pahang); Upper Permian (Wuchiapingian) of South China (Zhejiang, Jiangxi and Sichuan); Upper Permian (Lopingian) of southwest Japan (Mizukoshi).

Order Orthotetida Waagen, 1884

Suborder Orthotetidina Waagen, 1884

Superfamily Orthotetoidea Waagen, 1884

Family Derbyiidae Stehli, 1954

Genus Derbyia Waagen, 1884

Type species.Derbyia regularis Waagen, 1884.

Derbyia nipponica Nakamura, 1972a Figures 8.12–8.16c

Material.—Twelve specimens from locality MZ-S2: (1) internal mould of a conjoined valve, NU-B903; (2) external and internal moulds of four ventral valves, NU-B904-907; (3) internal moulds of three ventral valves, NU-B908-910; (4) external and internal moulds of a dorsal valve, NU-B911; (5) internal moulds of three dorsal valves, NU-B912-914.

Description.—Shell medium to large for genus, transversely subelliptical in outline; hinge much shorter than greatest width at about midvalve; length 48 mm, width 54 mm in the largest specimen (NU-B904). Ventral valve slightly convex to nearly flat, ornament consisting of numerous fine costellae and 5–8 irregular strong rugae; costellae with narrow interspaces, increasing by intercalation, numbering 9–11 in 5 mm at midvalve. Dorsal valve gently but more strongly convex than ventral valve, ornament same as opposite valve. Internally, ventral valve having thin, long median septum, extending to near midvalve; dorsal valve with divergent, strong crural plates.

Remarks.—These specimens can be referred to Derbyia nipponica Nakamura, 1972a, from the lower Kanokura Formation of the South Kitakami Belt, northeast Japan, on account of their medium to large, transverse shells with short hinge and regular, fine costellae on both valves.

Derbyia schellwieni Frech (1911, p. 125, pl. 18, figs. 3a–3d), from the Upper Permian (Lopingian) of Jiangxi, East China, is similar in size and outline, but the Chinese species is clearly distinguished from D. nipponica by its distinct parvicostellate ornament with strong first-order costellae.

Derbyia buchi (d’Orbigny, 1842), as illustrated in Kozlowski (1914, pl. 8, figs. 1–6), is similar in size, transverse outline, and slightly convex ventral valve, but differs in having fewer and stronger costellae on both valves.

The type species, Derbyia regularis Waagen (1884, p. 594, pl. 53, figs. 1, 2, 4), from the Amb and Wargal Formations of the Salt Range, differs from D. nipponica in having a wider hinge and much stronger and more regular costellae on both valves.

Distribution.—Middle Permian (Wordian-Capitanian) of central and northeast Japan (Hida Gaien and South Kitakami Belts); Upper Permian (Lopingian) of southwest Japan (Mizukoshi).

Order Orthida Schuchert and Cooper, 1932

Suborder Dalmanellidina Moore, 1952

Superfamily Enteletoidea Waagen, 1884

Family Schizophoriidae Schuchert and LeVene, 1929

Genus Acosarina Cooper and Grant, 1969

Type species.Acosarina dorsisulcata Cooper and Grant, 1969.

Acosarina cf. circular Xu, 1987 Figures 8.7a–8.8b

  • Cf. Acosarina circular Xu, 1987, p. 216, 318, pl. 13, figs. 12, 13, 17.

Material.—Five specimens from locality MZ-S2: (1) external moulds of two ventral valves, NU-B859, 860; (2) internal moulds of three ventral valves, NU-B861–863.

Description.—Shell small for genus, subcircular or slightly wider than long, with greatest width at midvalve; length 10 mm, width 11 mm in the largest specimen (NU-B861). Hinge short, about half of width; anterior margin rounded, rectimarginate. Ventral valve slightly convex, no fold. External surface multicostellate, 4–5 costellae in 1 mm near anterior margin. Internally, ventral valve with short dental plates and low but long median septum, extending over two-thirds of length.

Remarks.—These specimens are safely assigned to the genus Acosarina by their small, subcircular, rectimarginate and multicostellate shell. In size, shape and internal structure of the ventral valve, especially its having a long median septum, the Mizukoshi specimens most resemble Acosarina circular Xu, 1987, originally described from the Wuchiapingian of Hunan, South China. Accurate comparison is, however, difficult due to the lack of examples of the dorsal valve.

The type species, Acosarina dorsisulcata Cooper and Grant (1969, p. 2, pl. 5, figs. 19–23; 1976, p. 2621, pl. 667, figs. 1–26; pl. 673, figs. 1–6) is also small in size, but the Texan species differs from the present species in having a relatively shorter ventral median septum.

Genus Orthotichia Hall and Clarke, 1892

Type species.Orthis? morganiana Derby, 1874.

Orthotichia sp. Figures 8.9a, 8.9b

Material.—One specimen from locality MZ-S2, internal mould of a ventral valve, NU-B864.

Remarks.—The single ventral valve specimen from Mizukoshi is small in size (length 10 mm, width about 11 mm), subcircular in outline, and it has a pair of strong dental plates and a long median septum, extending slightly anterior to the ends of the dental plates. The surface ornament of the ventral valve is faintly imprinted, being multicostellate. This specimen is safely assigned to the genus Orthotichia on the basis of its small, subcircular ventral valve, with strong dental plates and long median septum. In Orthotichia the median septum is much shorter than that of Acosarina. The Mizukoshi specimen well resembles Orthotichia sp. Huang (1933, p. 6, pl. 1, figs. 6a–6d) from the Changhsingian of Guizhou, South China in size and outline of the ventral valve, but the poor preservation of the present material makes accurate comparison difficult.

Order Athyridida Boucot, Johnson and Staton, 1964

Suborder Retziidina Boucot, Johnson and Staton, 1964

Superfamily Retzioidea Waagen, 1883

Family Neoretziidae Dagys, 1972

Subfamily Hustediinae Grunt, 1986

Genus Hustedia Hall and Clarke, 1893

Type species.—Terebratula mormoni Marcou, 1858.

Hustedia ratburiensis Waterhouse and Piyasin, 1970 Figures 8.2a–8.6b

Material.—Fifteen specimens from locality MZ-S2: (1) internal mould of a conjoined valve, NU-B1037; (2) external moulds of four ventral valves, NU-B1038–1041; (3) internal moulds of five ventral valves, NU-B1042–1046; (4) external mould of a dorsal valve, NU-B1047; (5) internal moulds of four dorsal valves, NU-B1048–1051.

Description.—Shell medium size for genus, suboval in outline, with greatest width slightly anterior to midvalve; length 9 mm, width 7 mm in the largest ventral valve specimen (NU-B1038); length 6 mm, width 7 mm in the best preserved dorsal valve specimen (NU-B1047). Ventral valve moderately convex in lateral profile, most convex at umbonal region, without sulcus. External surface of ventral valve ornamented by simple, broad and rounded costae; 2 close-set costae medianly and 4 pairs of costae laterally. Dorsal valve slightly transverse, moderately but more weakly convex than the opposite valve, without fold. Surface ornament same as ventral one, consisting of a median costa and 4 pairs of lateral costae. Internal structures are not well preserved in the present specimens.

Remarks.—The Mizukoshi specimens can be referred to Hustedia ratburiensis Waterhouse and Piyasin, 1970 by their size, outline and external ornament. This species was described and compared in detail by Waterhouse and Piyasin (1970) and Grant (1976).

Hustedia indica (Waagen, 1883, p. 493, pl. 35, figs. 1, 2) from the Wargal Formation of the Salt Range differs from H. ratburiensis in its more elongate shell with broader plicae.

The type species, Hustedia grandicosta (Davidson, 1862, p. 28, pl. 1, fig. 5; Waagen, 1883, p. 491, pl. 34, figs. 6–12) from the Productus Limestone of the Salt Range differs from the present species in having more numerous, finer costae on both the ventral and dorsal valves.

Distribution.—Lower Permian (Kungurian) to Upper Permian (Wuchiapingian) of Thailand (Khao Phrik, Khao Nong Ta On and Khao Hin King); Middle Permian (Wordian) to Upper Permian (Lopingian) of Japan (Moribu and Mizukoshi).

Order Rhynchonellida Kuhn, 1949

Superfamily Rhynchoporacea Muir-Wood, 1955

Family Rhynchoporidae Muir-Wood, 1955

Genus Rhynchopora King, 1865

Type species.Terebratula geinitziana de Verneuil, 1845.

Rhynchopora matsumotoi sp. nov. Figures 8.10a–8.10c

Etymology.—Named for Prof. Tatsuro Matsumoto.

Material.—One specimen from locality MZ-S2, external mould of a dorsal valve and associated internal mould of the conjoined valve, NU-B1052 (holotype).

Diagnosis.—Small, transverse Rhynchopora, with 5 costae in ventral sulcus and 6 costae on dorsal fold.

Description.—Shell small for genus, transversely pentagonal in outline, with greatest width slightly anterior to midvalve; length about 10 mm, width 12 mm in the holotype specimen (NU-B1052). Ventral valve gently convex in lateral profile; sulcus wide and shallow. Dorsal valve gently convex, with a broad and low fold. External surface of both valves ornamented by simple numerous costae; 5 in ventral sulcus, 5–6 on each flank of ventral valve; 6 on dorsal fold, 4–5 on each flank of dorsal valve. Internal structures of both valves are obscure.

Remarks.Rhynchopora matsumotoi n. sp. most resembles Rhynchopora tschernyschae Koczyrkevicz (1979, p. 47, pl. 11, figs. 1–4) from the Barabashevka Formation of South Primorye, Far East Russia in size and shape of the shell, but it differs from the Russian species in having more numerous costae on the ventral sulcus and dorsal fold.

Rhynchopora scorsa Reed (1944, p. 129, pl. 21, figs. 5–8) from the Wargal Formation of the Salt Range, Pakistan differs from the Mizukoshi species in its larger and less transverse shell.

Rhynchopora sp. Figures 8.11a, 8.11b

Material.—One specimen from locality MZ-S2, internal mould of a ventral valve, NU-B1053.

Remarks.—This specimen is safely assigned to the genus Rhynchopora by its small size (length 10 mm, width 11 mm), pentagonal outline, fine simple costae and broad and shallow ventral sulcus with 3 rounded costae in the bottom. The Mizukoshi specimen well resembles shells described as Rhynchopora tschernyshae Koczyrkevicz, 1979 from the upper Oyakejima Formation of the Ogatsu area, South Kitakami Belt, northeast Japan (Tazawa et al., 2000, p. 10, pl. 1, figs. 6a–6d), and Rhynchopora sp. from the lower Moribu Formation of the Moribu area, Hida Gaien Belt, central Japan (Shi and Tazawa, 2001, p. 756, figs. 2.2a, 2.2b; Tazawa, 2001b, p. 299, figs. 8.5a–8.5c) in size, shape and surface ornament of the ventral valve. But accurate comparison is difficult for the poorly preserved specimen.

Order Spiriferida Waagen, 1883

Suborder Spiriferidina Waagen, 1883

Superfamily Spiriferoidea King, 1846

Family Trigonotretidae Schuchert, 1893

Subfamily Neospiriferinae Waterhouse, 1968a

Genus Gypospirifer Cooper and Grant, 1976

Type species.Gypospirifer nelsoni Cooper and Grant, 1976, p. 2214, pl. 591, figs. 6–9.

Gypospirifer volatilis Duan and Li, 1985 Figures 9.3–9.7

Figure 9.

1a–2b. Elivina sp., 1a, 1b: internal mould of a ventral valve, NU-B915, (1b ×2), 2a, 2b: internal mould of a dorsal valve, NU-B919, (2b ×2), 3–7. Gypospirifer volatilis Duan and Li, 3: internal mould of a ventral valve, NU-B726, 4: external latex cast of a ventral valve, GK-D31003, 5: external latex cast of a dorsal valve, GK-D31005, 6: external latex cast of a ventral valve, NU-B723, 7: internal latex cast of a ventral valve, NU-B724, 8a–14. Alispiriferella lita (Fredericks), 8a, 8b: external mould and external latex cast of a ventral valve, NU-B934, 9: external latex cast of a ventral valve, NU-B936, 10: external latex cast of a ventral valve, GK-D31017, 11: internal mould of a ventral valve, NU-B714, 12a, 12b: internal mould and internal latex cast of a ventral valve, NU-B950, 13a, 13b, 13c: external latex cast of a ventral valve and ventral and dorsal views of internal mould of a conjoined valve, NU-B924, 14: external latex cast of a ventral valve, NU-B935, 15a–18c. Dielasma sp., 15a, 15b: ventral and dorsal views of internal mould of a conjoined valve, NU-B1054, 16a, 16b, 16c: ventral, dorsal and lateral views of internal mould of a conjoined valve, NU-B1055, 17: internal mould of a ventral valve, NU-B1060, 18a, 18b, 18c: ventral, dorsal and lateral views of internal mould of a conjoined valve, NU-B1057. (Natural size unless otherwise indicated).

i1342-8144-12-1-37-f09.gif

Material.—Sixteen specimens from locality MZ-S1: (1) external moulds of two conjoined valves, GK-D31003, 31008; (2) external moulds of a ventral valve, NU-B723; (3) internal moulds of ten ventral valves, GK-D31001, 31002, NU-B724–731; (4) external moulds of three dorsal valves, GK-D31004, 31005, 31009.

Description.—Shell medium to large for genus, transversely semielliptical in outline with greatest width at hinge, and slightly alate; length about 50 mm, width more than 70 mm in the largest specimen (NU-B726); length about 38 mm, width about 60 mm in the best preserved specimen (GK-D31005). Ventral valve gently convex in lateral and anterior profiles, most convex at umbonal region; umbo slightly extended and strongly incurved; interarea moderately high, broad and gently concave; sulcus deep, narrow, and rapidly widening anteriorly, with U-shaped bottom. External surface of ventral valve ornamented by numerous costae and very fine growth lines; costae subridged, added by bifurcation, and weakly fasciculated, numbering 10–12 in 10 mm at about midvalve. Dorsal valve gently convex in both profiles, having a high and narrow fold. External ornament of dorsal valve similar to that of opposite valve. Ventral valve interior with a pair of thick, short dental plates and a deeply impressed muscle field.

Remarks.—The Mizukoshi specimens are not so well preserved but they can be identified with Gypospirifer volatilis Duan and Li, 1985, originally described from the Middle Permian Zhesi (Jisu) Formation of the Zhesi area, Inner Mongolia, by their size, outline, and surface ornamentation, especially the deep ventral sulcus and high dorsal fold. Tazawa (2001b, p. 302) has discussed this species and its comparison with related forms.

A single ventral specimen, described and figured by Yanagisawa (1967, p. 90, pl. 2, fig. 18) as Neospirifer cf. fasciger (Keyserling) from the Kashiwadaira Formation (= upper Takakurayama Formation) of the Takakurayama area, Abukuma Mountains, northeast Japan, is referred to Gypospirifer volatilis in its large size and having a fold rapidly widening anteriorly.

Distribution.—Middle Permian (Wordian-Capitanian) of North China (Zhesi and Xiujimqinqi, Inner Mongolia) and central Japan (Moribu in the Hida Gaien Belt); Upper Permian (Lopingian) of Northeast China (Jilin), northeast Japan (Takakurayama) and southwest Japan (Mizukoshi).

Family Spiriferellidae Waterhouse, 1968a

Genus Alispiriferella Waterhouse and Waddington, 1982

Type species.Spirifer (Spiriferella) keilhavii (von Buch) var. ordinaria Einor in Licharew and Einor, 1939.

Alispiriferella lita (Fredericks, 1924) Figures 9.8a–9.14

Material.—Seventy specimens from localities MZ-S1 and MZ-S2: (1) external and internal moulds of a conjoined valve (from MZ-S1), NU-B711; (2) external mould of a conjoined valve (from MZ-S2), NU-B923; (3) external mould of a ventral valve with internal mould of a conjoined valve (from MZ-S2), NU-B924; (4) internal moulds of nine conjoined valves (from MZ-S2), NU-B925–933; (5) external and internal moulds of a ventral valve (from MZ-S1), NU-B712; (6) external moulds of nine ventral valves (five specimens from MZ-S1), GK-D31013, 31014, 31017, 31022, 31023, (four specimens from MZ-S2), NU-B934–937; (7) internal moulds of forty-five ventral valves (eleven specimens from MZ-S1), NU-B713–721, GK-D31011, 31021, (thirty-four specimens from MZ-S2), NU-B938–971; (8) external and internal moulds of three dorsal valves (from MZ-S2), NU-B972–974; (9) external moulds of five dorsal valves (from MZ-S2), NU-B975–979; (10) internal moulds of twenty-six dorsal valves (one specimen from MZ-S1), NU-B722, (twenty-five specimens from MZ-S2), NU-B980–1004.

Description.—Shell large for genus, transversely trapezoidal in outline; hinge straight, equal to widest part; length about 27 mm, width about 70 mm in the largest specimen (NU-B713); length about 34 mm, width about 58 mm in another large specimen (NU-B934). Ventral valve moderately convex in lateral profile, with maximum convexity at umbonal slope; interarea moderately high, broad and gently concave, with large delthyrium; sulcus deep, wide and having smooth V-shaped bottom; 5 pairs of strong, simple, broad and rounded costae on each side of sulcus. Dorsal valve moderately convex in both lateral and anterior profiles; fold high, wide and having a median groove; 4–5 pairs of simple or bifurcated costae on each side of fold.

Ventral interior with a pair of high dental plates and a deeply impressed heart-shaped muscle field. Dorsal interior with small, laminated cardinal process and subhorizontal socket plates. Other internal structures are obscure.

Remarks.—These specimens are referred to Alispiriferella lita (Fredericks, 1924), originally described from the Middle Permian of the Vladivostok area, South Primorye, by their large, transverse shells, ventral sulcus with smooth V-shaped bottom and strong, simple and rounded costae on the ventral valves.

The type species, Alispiriferella ordinaria (Einor in Licharew and Einor, 1939) from the Lower Permian of Novaya Zemlya is clearly distinguished from A. lita by its smaller and less transverse shell with ventral sulcus bearing two prominent sulcal costae and more often fasciculate costae on both ventral and dorsal valves.

The smaller specimens, described by Tazawa (2001b) as A. ordinaria and Alispiriferella japonica Tazawa, 2001b from the Middle Permian of Moribu, central Japan seem to be young shells of A. lita, in that they have a smooth-bottomed ventral sulcus.

Distribution.—Middle Permian (Wordian-Capitanian) of North China (Zhesi and Xiujimqinqi, Inner Mongolia), Northeast China (Heilongjiang), eastern Russia (South Primorye), northeast Japan (Kesennuma in the South Kitakami Belt), central Japan (Moribu in the Hida Gaien Belt); Upper Permian (Lopingian) of northeast Japan (Ogatsu in the southern Kitakami Mountains) and southwest Japan (Mizukoshi).

Genus Elivina Fredericks, 1924

Type species.Spirifer tibetana Diener, 1897.

Elivina sp. Figures 9.1a–9.2b

Material.—Eight specimens from locality MZ-S2: (1) internal mould of a ventral valve, NU-B915; (2) external and internal moulds of a dorsal valve, NU-B916; (3) external moulds of two dorsal valves, NU-B917, 918; (4) internal moulds of a dorsal valve with posterior fragment of the ventral valve, NU-B919; (5) internal moulds of three dorsal valves, NU-B920-922.

Remarks.—These specimens are safely assigned to the genus Elivina by their small, elongate oval shell (length about 18 mm, width about 16 mm in the single ventral valve specimen, NU-B922) with short hinge and 3 or 4 simple coarse costae on each side of both the ventral and dorsal valves. The Mizukoshi species resembles Elivina bishaini Archbold and Barkham (1989, p. 132, figs. 6A–6Z, 6AA–6LL) from the Maubisse Formation of Bisnain, West Timor in size and outline of the shell, but it differs from the Timor species in having coarse simple costae on both valves.

The type species, Elivina tibetana (Diener, 1897, p.45, pl. 6, figs. 1–7) from the Chitichun Limestone is also elongate oval in outline, but it is much larger in size.

Order Terebratulida Waagen, 1883

Suborder Terebratulidina Waagen, 1883

Superfamily Dielasmatoidea Schuchert, 1913

Family Dielasmatidae Schuchert, 1913

Subfamily Dielasmatinae Schuchert, 1913

Genus Dielasma King, 1859

Type species.Terebratulites elongatus Schlotheim, 1816.

Dielasma sp. Figures 9.15a–9.18c

Material.—Nine specimens from locality MZ-S2: (1) internal moulds of five conjoined valves, NU-B1054–1058; (2) internal moulds of four ventral valves, NU-B1059–1062.

Description.—Shell medium size for genus, elongate subpentagonal in outline, with greatest width slightly anterior to midvalve; length 31 mm, width about 20 mm in the largest specimen (NU-B1062). Ventral valve gently and unevenly convex in lateral profile, rather strongly convex in umbonal region but flattened on venter; sulcus broad and shallow on anterior one-third of the valve. Dorsal valve less convex; fold absent. Surface ornament not well preserved in the present specimens. Ventral interior with a pair of strong, subparallel dental plates. Internal structures of dorsal valve obscure.

Remarks.—These specimens are safely assigned to the genus Dielasma by their size and shape of the shell and in having strong dental plates in the ventral valve. The Mizukoshi species superficially resembles Dielasma timanica Tschernyschew (1902, p. 38, 459, pl. 1, fig. 2; pl. 2, fig. 9) from the Lower Permian of Timan and the Urals, although it is smaller in size than the Russian species.

Dielasma sp. (Tazawa, 2001b, p. 303, figs. 8.27, 8.28) from the lower Moribu Formation of Moribu, Hida Gaien Belt, central Japan is clearly distinguished from the present species in having a narrow but distinct median fold on the ventral valve.

Acknowledgments

Sincere thanks are due to S. Hasegawa, Yachiyo Engineering Co., Ltd., Fukuoka, for his help in the field; T. Kurihara, Department of Geology, Niigata University for his help drawing figures; and G. R. Shi, Deakin University, Melbourne and S. Z. Shen, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Academia Sinica for their critical review of the manuscript by which this paper is greatly improved.

References

1.

G. A. Afanasjeva 1988. Brakhiopody otryada Chonetida. Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta vol. 228:p. 1–122. (in Russian). Google Scholar

2.

G. A. Afanasjeva and J. Tazawa . 2007. New large chonetids (Brachiopoda) from the Middle Permian of the southern Kitakami Mountains, northeast Japan. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal, 2007 no. 4p. 71–74. (in Russian). Google Scholar

3.

N. W. Archbold 1999. Additional records of Permian brachiopods from near Rat Buri, Thailand. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria vol. 111:p. 71–86. Google Scholar

4.

N. W. Archbold and S. T. Barkham . 1989. Permian Brachiopoda from near Bisnain Village, West Timor. Alcheringa vol. 13:p. 125–140. Google Scholar

5.

N. W. Archbold and P. R. Bird . 1989. Permian Brachiopoda from near Kasliu Village, West Timor. Alcheringa vol. 13:p. 103–123. Google Scholar

6.

F. W. Booker 1930. A review of some of the Permo-Carboniferous Productidae of New South Wales, with a tentative reclassification. Journal of the Royal Society of New South Wales vol. 64:p. 65–77. Google Scholar

7.

F. W. Booker 1932. A new species of Productus from the Lower Bowen Series—Queensland. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Queensland vol. 43:p. 66–72. Google Scholar

8.

A. J. Boucot, J. G. Johnson, and R. D. Staton . 1964. On some atrypoid, retzioid and athyridoid Brachiopoda. Journal of Paleontology vol. 38:p. 805–822. Google Scholar

9.

H. G. Bronn 1862. Die Klassen und Ordnungen der Weichthiere (Malacozoa) vol. 3:no. 1518. p. C. F. Winter'sche Verlagshand-lung. Leipzig u. Heidelberg. Google Scholar

10.

M. J. Campi, S. Z. Shen, M. S. Leman, and G. R. Shi . 2000. First record of Permianella He & Zhu, 1979 (Permianellidae; Brachiopoda) from Peninsular Malaysia. Alcheringa vol. 24:p. 37–43. Google Scholar

11.

M. J. Campi and G. R. Shi . 2005. New Lopingian (Late Permian) rugosochonetid species from Sichuan, South China. Alcheringa vol. 29:p. 275–285. Google Scholar

12.

L. Chan (Zhan) and L. Lee . 1962. Early Permian Maokouan brachiopods from eastern Qinling. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica vol. 10:p. 472–493. (in Chinese). Google Scholar

13.

Y. T. Chao 1927. Productidae of China, pt. 1. Producti. Palaeontologia Sinica, Ser. B vol. 5:p. 1–244. Google Scholar

14.

T. T. Chi-Thuan 1962. Les brachiopodes permiens de Cam-Lo (Province de Quang-Tri). Annales de la Faculté des Sciences, Université de Saigon, 1962 p. 485–498. Google Scholar

15.

M. M. Colani 1919. Sur quelques fossiles ouralo-permiens de Hongay. Bulletin du Service Géologique de l'Indochine vol. 6:p. 1–27. Google Scholar

16.

G. A. Cooper and R. E. Grant . 1969. New Permian brachiopods from West Texas. Smithsonian Contribution to Paleobiology no. 1p. 1–20. Google Scholar

17.

G. A. Cooper and R. E. Grant . 1976. Permian brachiopods of West Texas, 4. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology no. 21p. 1923–2607. Google Scholar

18.

A. S. Dagys 1972. Morfologiya i sistema mezozoyskikh rettsioidnykh brakhiopod. Trudy Institut Geologii i Geofiziki, Sibirskoe Otdelenie, Akademiya Nauk SSSR vol. 112:p. 94–105. (in Russian). Google Scholar

19.

T. Davidson 1862. On some Carboniferous Brachiopoda, collected in India by A. Fleming, M. D., and W. Purdon, Esq., F.G.S. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London vol. 18:p. 25–35. Google Scholar

20.

O. A. Derby 1874. On the Carboniferous Brachiopoda of Itaituba, Rio Tapajos, Province of Para, Brazil. Cornell University Scientific Bulletin, Ser. 2 vol. 1:p. 1–63. Google Scholar

21.

C. Diener 1897. The Permocarboniferous fauna of Chitichun, no. 1. Palaeontologia Indica, Ser. 15 vol. 1:p. 1–105. Google Scholar

22.

P. Ding and W. Qi . 1983. Carboniferous and Permian Brachiopoda. In, Xian Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources ed. Palaeontological Atlas of Northwest China; Shaanxi, Gansu and Ninxia Volume, pt. 2. Upper Palaeozoic p. 244–425. Geological Publishing House. Beijing. (in Chinese). Google Scholar

23.

C. Duan and W. Li . 1985. Description of fossils, (4) Phylum Brachiopoda. In Y. Ding, G. Xia, C. Duan, W. Li, X. Liu, and Z. Liang , editors. Study on the Early Permian stratigraphy and fauna in Zhesi district, Nei Mongol Zizhiqu (Inner Mongolia). Bulletin of the Tianjin Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources no. 10p. 99–145. 199–214. (in Chinese). Google Scholar

24.

R. Feng and Z. Jiang . 1978. Phylum Brachiopoda. In, Geological and Palaeontological Team of Guizhou ed. Palaeontological Atlas of Southwest China; Guizhou, pt. 2. Carboniferous to Quaternary Volume p. 231–305. Geological Publishing House. Beijing. (in Chinese). Google Scholar

25.

F. Frech 1911. Die Dyas. In Fvon Richthofen , editor. China, Bd. 5 p. 103–202.D. Reimer. Berlin. Google Scholar

26.

G. Fredericks 1924. Ussuriyskiy verkhniy paleozoy, 1. Brachiopoda. Materiali po Geologii i Poleznim Iskopaemim Dalnego Vostoka no. 28p. 1–52. (in Russian). Google Scholar

27.

G. Fredericks 1925. Ussuriyskiy verkhniy paleozoy, 2. Permskie brakhiopodi s misa Kaluzina. Materiali po Geologii i Poleznim Iskopaemim Dalnego Vostoka no. 40p. 1–28. (in Russian). Google Scholar

28.

R. E. Grant 1976. Permian brachiopods from southern Thailand. The Paleontological Society Memoir no. 9p. 1–269. Google Scholar

29.

J. E. Gray 1840. Synopsis of the contents of the British Museum 42nd edition370. p. British Museum. London. Google Scholar

30.

A. D. Grigorjeva and G. V. Kotlyar . 1977. Sistematicheskoe opisanie; Semeystvo Anidantidae. In T. G. Sarytcheva , editor. ed. Pozdnepaleozoyskie produktidy Sibiri i Arktiki. Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta vol. 161:p. 53–65. (in Russian). Google Scholar

31.

T. A. Grunt 1986. Sistema brakhiopod otryada Atiridida. Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta vol. 215:p. 1–200. (in Russian). Google Scholar

32.

F. Gu 1992. Carboniferous and Permian Brachiopoda. In, Jilin Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources ed. Palaeontological Atlas of Jilin p. 210–255. Jilin Science and Technology Publishing House. Changchun. (in Chinese). Google Scholar

33.

J. Hall and J. M. Clarke . 1892. An Introduction to the Study of the Genera of Palaeozoic Brachiopoda, Palaeontology of New York vol. 8:pt. 1367. p. Charles van Benthuysen & Sons. Albany. Google Scholar

34.

J. Hall and J. M. Clarke . 1893. An Introduction to the Study of the Genera of Palaeozoic Brachiopoda, Palaeontology of New York vol. 8:pt. 2317. p. Charles van Benthuysen & Sons. Albany. Google Scholar

35.

I. Hayasaka 1925. On some brachiopods from the Lyttonia horizon of the Kitakami Mountains. Japanese Journal of Geology and Geography vol. 4:p. 89–103. Google Scholar

36.

I. Hayasaka 1960. On the occurrence of Neospirifer fasciger (Keyserling) in Japan, and a note on some associate Permian brachiopods from around Kesennuma City, northeast Japan. In, Shimane University ed. Collection of Essays in Commemoration of the Tenth Anniversary (1959) of Shimane University (Natural Science) p. 34–57.Shimane University. Matsue. Google Scholar

37.

I. Hayasaka and M. Minato . 1956. Some brachiopods from the lower Kanokura Series of the Kitakami Mountains, Japan. Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, N. S no. 21p. 141–147. Google Scholar

38.

X. He and M. Zhu . 1979. A new form of brachiopods and its systematical classification. Journal of China Institute of Mining Technology no. 4p. 131–140. (in Chinese). Google Scholar

39.

D. Hill 1950. The Productinae of the Artinskian Cracow fauna of Queensland. University of Queensland Papers, Department of Geology vol. 3:p. 1–36. Google Scholar

40.

E. Horikoshi, J. Tazawa, N. Naito, and J. Kaneda . 1987. Permian brachiopods from Moribu, north of Takayama City, Hida Mountains, central Japan. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan vol. 93:p. 141–143. (in Japanese). Google Scholar

41.

S. Hu 1983. Brachiopods from the Hsiaochiangpien Limestone, southern Jiangxi. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica vol. 22:p. 338–345. (in Chinese). Google Scholar

42.

T. K. Huang 1933. Late Permian Brachiopoda of southwestern China, pt. 2. Palaeontologia Sinica, Ser. B vol. 9:p. 1–131. Google Scholar

43.

Y. Jin 1963. Urushtenia from the Lower Permian of China. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica vol. 11:p. 1–31. (in Chinese). Google Scholar

44.

Y. Jin 1985. Permian Brachiopoda and palaeogeography of the Qinghai-Xizang (Tibet) Plateau. Palaeontologia Cathayana no. 2p. 19–71. Google Scholar

45.

Y. Jin and S. Hu . 1978. Brachiopods of the Kuhfeng Formation in south Anhui and Nanking Hills. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica vol. 17:p. 101–127. (in Chinese). Google Scholar

46.

H. Kano 1967. On the Usuginu granitic rocks in Kyushu, Japan— Studies on the granite-bearing conglomerate in Japan, no. 17—. Journal of the Mining College, Akita University vol. 4:p. 1–37. Google Scholar

47.

W. King 1846. Remarks on certain genera belonging to the class Palliobranchiata. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Ser. 1 vol. 18:p. 26–42. 83–94. Google Scholar

48.

W. King 1859. On Gwynia, Dielasma and Macandrevia, three new genera, etc. Dublin Zoological and Botanical Association, Proceedings vol. 1:p. 256–262. Google Scholar

49.

W. King 1865. Remarks of the history of two species of Rhynchopora geinitziana de Verneuil, from near the River Oukhla, Province of Archangel. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Ser. 3 vol. 16:p. 124–128. Google Scholar

50.

B. V. Koczyrkevicz 1979. Novie permskie Rhynchopora (Brachiopoda) Yuzhnogo Primorya i nekotorie voprosi ikh morfologii. In V. T. Petrashevskaya , editor. ed. Iscopaemie bespozvonochnie Dalnego Vostoka p. 41–49. DVNTS AN SSSR. Vladivostok. (in Russian). Google Scholar

51.

G. V. Kotlyar 1961. Rod Yakovlevia Fredericks. Dokladi Akademii Nauk SSSR vol. 140:p. 459–461. (in Russian). Google Scholar

52.

R. Kozlowski 1914. Les brachiopodes du Carbonifère supérieur de Bolivie. Annales de Paléontologie vol. 9:p. 1–100. Google Scholar

53.

O. Kühn 1949. Lehrbuch der Paläozoologie 326. p. E. Schweizerbart. Stuttgart. Google Scholar

54.

S. S. Lazarev 1986. Osnovnye napravleniia evoliutsii i sistema brakhiopod podotriada Productidina 41. p. Paleontologicheskii Institut, Akademiya Nauk SSSR. Moskva. (in Russian). Google Scholar

55.

L. Lee and F. Gu . 1976. Carboniferous and Permian Brachiopoda. In, Geological Bureau of Nei Mongol and Geological Institute of Northeast China eds. Palaeontological Atlas of Northeast China; Nei Mongol, pt. 1. Palaeozoic Volume p. 228–306. Geological Publishing House. Beijing. (in Chinese). Google Scholar

56.

L. Lee, F. Gu, and Y. Su . 1980. Carboniferous and Permian Brachiopoda. In, Shenyang Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources ed. Palaeontological Atlas of Northeast China, pt. 1. Palaeozoic Volume p. 327–428. Geological Publishing House. Beijing. (in Chinese). Google Scholar

57.

M. S. Leman 1994. The significance of Upper Permian brachiopods from Merapoh area, northwest Pahang. Geological Society of Malaysia, Bulletin vol. 35:p. 113–121. Google Scholar

58.

Z. Liao 1980. Upper Permian brachiopods from western Guizhou. In, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology ed. Stratigraphy and Palaeontology of the Upper Permian coal-bearing formation in western Guizhou and eastern Yunnan p. 241–277. Science Press. Beijing. (in Chinese). Google Scholar

59.

B. K. Licharew 1932. Fauna permskikh otlozheniy Severnogo Kavkaza 1: Brachiopoda podsemeystvo Orthotetinae Waagen. Trudy Vsesoyuznyi Geologo-Razvedochnyi Obedineriya NKTP SSSR vol. 215:p. 1–54. (in Russian). Google Scholar

60.

B. K. Licharew and O. L. Einor . 1939. Materialy k poznaniyu verkhnepaleozoyskikh faun Novoy Zemli Brachiopoda. Trudy Arkticheskogo Nauchno-Issledovatelskogo Instituta vol. 127:p. 1–245. (in Russian). Google Scholar

61.

B. K. Licharew and G. V. Kotlyar . 1978. Permskie brakhiopody Yuzhnogo Primorya. In L. I. Popeko , editor. ed. Verkhniy paleozoy Severo-vostochnoy Azii p. 63–75. DVNTS AN SSSR. Vladivostok. (in Russian). Google Scholar

62.

Z. Liu, Z. Tan, and Y. Ding . 1982. Phylum Brachiopoda. In, Geological Bureau of Hunan ed. The Palaeontological Atlas of Hunan p. 172–216. Geological Publishing House. Beijing. (in Chinese). Google Scholar

63.

I. N. Manankov 1998. Verkhnepermskie produktidy (brakhiopody) Yugo-Vostochnoy Mongolii. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal, 1998 no. 5p. 49–55. (in Russian). Google Scholar

64.

H. Mansuy 1913. Faunes des Calcaires à Productus de l'Indochine, Première Série. Mémoires du Service Géologique de l'Indochine vol. 2:p. 1–133. Google Scholar

65.

J. Marcou 1858. Geology of North America, with two reports on the prairies of Arkansas and Texas, the Rocky Mountains of New Mexico and the Sierra Nevada of California 144. p. Zürcher and Furrer. Zürich. Google Scholar

66.

T. Matsumoto and H. Huzimoto . 1939. On a formation belonging to the Titibu System in Kamimasuki-gun, Kumamoto-ken, Kyushu. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan vol. 46:p. 189–192. (in Japanese). Google Scholar

67.

R. C. Moore 1952. Brachiopoda. In R. C. Moore, C. G. Lalicker, and A. G. Fischer , editors. Invertebrate Fossils p. 197–267.McGraw-Hill. New York. Google Scholar

68.

J. Morris 1845. Description of fossils. In P. E. Strzelecki , editor. ed. Physical description of New South Wales and Van Diemens Land p. 278–285.Longmans. London. Google Scholar

69.

H. M. Muir-Wood 1955. A History of the Classification of the Phylum Brachiopoda 124. p. British Museum (Natural History). London. Google Scholar

70.

H. M. Muir-Wood 1962. On the morphology and classification of the brachiopod suborder Chonetoidea 132. p. British Museum (Natural History). London. Google Scholar

71.

H. M. Muir-Wood and G. A. Cooper . 1960. Morphology, classification and life habits of the Productoidea (Brachiopoda). Geological Society of America, Memoir no. 81p. 1–447. Google Scholar

72.

K. Nakamura 1959. Some Lower Permian Sakamotozawa brachiopods. Journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Ser. 4 vol. 10:p. 199–207. Google Scholar

73.

K. Nakamura 1972a. Permian Davidsoniacea from the southern Kitakami Mountains, Japan. Journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Ser. 4 vol. 15:p. 361–426. Google Scholar

74.

K. Nakamura 1972b. Anidanthus and Megousia (Brachiopoda) from the Permian of Japan and Cambodia. Journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Ser. 4 vol. 15:p. 427–445. Google Scholar

75.

K. Nakamura 1979. Additional occurrence of Urushtenoidea (Brachiopoda) from the Permian of Asia. Journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Ser. 4 vol. 19:p. 221–233. Google Scholar

76.

K. Nakamura and J. Tazawa . 1990. Faunal provinciality of the Permian brachiopods in Japan. In K. Ichikawa, S. Mizutani, I. Hara, S. Hada, and A. Yao , editors. eds. Pre-Cretaceous Terranes of Japan p. 213–320. Publication of IGCP Project No. 224. Nippon Insatsu Shuppan. Osaka. Google Scholar

77.

M. Noda 1956. Stratigraphical and palaeontological studies of the Toman Formation in the Kaishantun and Kamisanbo districts. Reports on Earth Science, Department of General Education, Kyushu University no. 2p. 1–22. Google Scholar

78.

J. Nonaka 1944. Some Permian brachiopods from Inner Mongolia. Japanese Journal of Geology and Geography vol. 19:p. 83–87. Google Scholar

79.

J. G. Norwood and H. Pratten . 1855. Notice of the genus Chonetes, as found in the Western states and territories with descriptions of eleven new species. Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences Journal, N. S vol. 3:p. 23–32. Google Scholar

80.

Y. Onuki 1969. Geology of the Kitakami Massif, northeast Japan. Contributions from the Institute of Geology and Paleontology, Tohoku University no. 69p. 1–239. (in Japanese). Google Scholar

81.

Ad' Orbigny 1842. Voyages dans l'Amérique Méridionale. Géologie, Paléontologie; Foraminifères vol. 3:p. 50–56.Pitois-Levrault. Paris. Google Scholar

82.

J. Pečar 1986. Upper Carboniferous and Permian mesolobid chonetacean brachiopods of Karavanke Mountains (Yugoslavia) and Carnian Alps (Italy). Geologija vol. 28/29:p. 9–53. Google Scholar

83.

K. L. Prendergast 1935. Some western Australian Upper Palaeozoic fossils. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia vol. 21:p. 9–35. Google Scholar

84.

F. R C. Reed 1944. Brachiopoda and Mollusca from the Productus Limestones of the Salt Range. Palaeontologia Indica, N. S vol. 23:p. 1–678. Google Scholar

85.

A. Rothpletz 1892. Die Perm-, Trias- und Jura-Formation auf Timor und Rotti im indischen Archipel. Palaeontographica vol. 39:p. 57–106. Google Scholar

86.

T. G. Sarytcheva 1977. Pozdnepaleozoyskie produktidy Sibiri i Arktiki. Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta vol. 161:p. 1–219. (in Russian). Google Scholar

87.

T. G. Sarytcheva and A. N. Sokolskaya . 1959. O klassifikatsii lozhnoporistykh brakhiopod. Dokladi Akademii Nauk SSSR vol. 125:p. 181–184. (in Russian). Google Scholar

88.

E. Schellwien 1892. Die Fauna des karnischen Fusulinenkalks, 1 Theil. Geologische Einleitung und Brachiopoda. Palaeontographica vol. 39:p. 1–56. Google Scholar

89.

E. F von Schlotheim 1816. Beiträge zur Naturgeschichte der Versteinerungen in geognostischer Hinsicht. Denkschriften der Wissenschaften in München, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse vol. 6:p. 13–36. Google Scholar

90.

C. Schuchert 1893. Classification of the Brachiopoda. American Geologist vol. 11:p. 141–167. Google Scholar

91.

C. Schuchert 1913. Class 2. Brachiopoda. In Avon Zittel , editor. ed. Text-book of Palaeontology vol. 1:pt. 12nd ed.p. 355–420.Macmillan. London. Google Scholar

92.

C. Schuchert 1929. Classification of brachiopod genera, fossil and recent. In C. Schuchert and C. M. LeVene , editors. Animalia pars 42, Fossilium Catalogus, vol. 1 p. 10–25.W. Junk. Berlin. Google Scholar

93.

C. Schuchert and G. A. Cooper . 1932. Brachiopod genera of the suborders Orthoidea and Pentameroidea. Memoirs of the Peabody Museum of Natural History vol. 4:p. 1–270. Google Scholar

94.

C. Schuchert and C. M. LeVene . 1929. Brachiopoda (Generum et genotyporum index et bibliographia). In J. F. Pompeckj , editor. ed. Fossilium Catalogus, vol. 1. Animalia, pars 42 140. p. W. Junk. Berlin. Google Scholar

95.

S. Z. Shen and N. W. Archbold . 2002. Chonetoidea (Brachiopoda) from the Lopingian (Late Permian) of South China. Alcheringa vol. 25:p. 327–349. Google Scholar

96.

S. Z. Shen, G. R. Shi, and Z. Fang . 2002. Permian brachiopods from Baoshan and Simao blocks in western Yunnan, China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences vol. 20:p. 665–682. Google Scholar

97.

S. Z. Shen and J. Tazawa . 1997. Two permianellids (Brachiopoda) from the Middle Permian of the southern Kitakami Mountains, northeast Japan. Paleontological Research vol. 1:p. 285–290. Google Scholar

98.

G. R. Shi and J. Tazawa . 2001. Rhynchopora and Blasispirifer (Brachiopoda) from the Middle Permian of the Hida Gaien Belt, central Japan, and their paleobiogeographical significance. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan vol. 107:p. 755–761. Google Scholar

99.

G. R. Shi and J. B. Waterhouse . 1996. Lower Permian brachiopods and molluscs from the upper Jungle Creek Formation, northern Yukon Territory, Canada. Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin no. 424p. 1–241. Google Scholar

100.

F. G. Stehli 1954. Lower Leonardian Brachiopoda of the Sierra Diablo. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History vol. 105:p. 262–358. Google Scholar

101.

D. L. Stepanov 1934. Brakhiopody mshankovykh izvestnyakov Kolvinskogo rayona (Severny Ural). 1. Strophomenacea. Trudy NGRI, Ser. A vol. 37:p. 1–63. (in Russian). Google Scholar

102.

J. Tazawa 1976. The Permian of Kesennuma, Kitakami Mountains: A preliminary report. Earth Science (Chikyu Kagaku) vol. 30:p. 175–185. Google Scholar

103.

J. Tazawa 1979. Middle Permian brachiopods from Matsukawa, Kesennuma region, southern Kitakami Mountains. Saito Ho-on Kai Museum Research Bulletin no. 47p. 23–35. Google Scholar

104.

J. Tazawa 1991. Middle Permian brachiopod biogeography of Japan and adjacent regions in East Asia. In K. Ishii, X. Liu, K. Ichikawa, and B. Huang . eds. Pre-Jurassic Geology of Inner Mongolia, China: Report of China-Japan Cooperative Research Group, 1987–1989 p. 213–230.Matsuya Insatsu. Osaka. Google Scholar

105.

J. Tazawa 1993. Pre-Neogene tectonics of the Japanese Islands from the viewpoint of palaeobiogeography. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan vol. 99:p. 525–543. (in Japanese). Google Scholar

106.

J. Tazawa 1999. Boreal-type brachiopod Yakovlevia from the Middle Permian of Japan. Paleontological Research vol. 3:p. 88–94. Google Scholar

107.

J. Tazawa 2000. Permian brachiopod faunas and pre-Neogene tectonics in the Inner Side of Southwest Japan. Monograph (Chidanken Senpoh) no. 49p. 5–22. (in Japanese). Google Scholar

108.

J. Tazawa 2001a. Middle Permian brachiopod faunas of Japan and South Primorye, Far East Russia: their palaeobiogeographic and tectonic implications. Geosciences Journal vol. 5:p. 19–26. Google Scholar

109.

J. Tazawa 2001b. Middle Permian brachiopods from the Moribu area, Hida Gaien Belt, central Japan. Paleontological Research vol. 5:p. 283–310. Google Scholar

110.

J. Tazawa 2004. The strike-slip model: A synthesis on the origin and tectonic evolution of the Japanese Islands. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan vol. 110:p. 503–517. (in Japanese). Google Scholar

111.

J. Tazawa 2007. Middle Permian brachiopod faunas of Japan and their significance for understanding the Paleozoic-Mesozoic tectonics of the Japanese Islands. In ThE. Wong , editor. ed. Proceedings of the XVth International Congress on Carboniferous and Permian Stratigraphy. Utrecht, the Netherlands, 10–16 August 2003 p. 565–573.Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. Amsterdam. Google Scholar

112.

J. Tazawa 2008a. Permian bipolar-type brachiopod genus Terrakea from the South Kitakami and Hida Gaien belts, Japan: Palaeobiogeographical implications. Earth Science (Chikyu Kagaku) vol. 62:p. 63–67. (in Japanese). Google Scholar

113.

J. Tazawa 2008b. A bipolar brachiopod genus Terrakea from the Middle Permian of the South Kitakami Belt, northeast Japan. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria (in press). Google Scholar

114.

J. Tazawa and Z. Q. Chen . 2006. Middle Permian brachiopods from the Tumenling Formation in the Wuchang area, southern Heilongjiang, NE China, and their palaeobiogeographical implications. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences vol. 26:p. 327–338. Google Scholar

115.

J. Tazawa and S. Hasegawa . 2007. Anidanthus, Gypospirifer and Alispiriferella (Brachiopoda) from the Upper Permian Mizukoshi Formation, central Kyushu, SW Japan. Science Reports of NiigataUniversity (Geology) no. 22p. 1–14. Google Scholar

116.

J. Tazawa and Y. Ibaraki . 2001. Middle Permian brachiopods from Setamai, the type locality of the Kanokura Formation, southern Kitakami Mountains, northeast Japan. Science Reports of Niigata University, Ser. E no. 16p. 1–33. Google Scholar

117.

J. Tazawa and T. Matsumoto . 1998. Middle Permian brachiopods from the Oguradani Formation, Ise district, Hida Gaien Belt, central Japan. Science Reports of Niigata University, Ser. E no. 13p. 1–19. Google Scholar

118.

J. Tazawa, F. Takizawa, and K. Kamada . 2000. A Middle Permian Boreal-Tethyan mixed brachiopod fauna from Yakejima, southern Kitakami Mountains, NE Japan. Science Reports of Niigata University, Ser. E no. 15p. 1–21. Google Scholar

119.

E. Tobe, H. Takagi, and K. Shibata . 2000. K-Ar ages of the granitic clasts from the Mizukoshi Formation in the Higo Belt, western Kyushu. Memoirs of the Geological Society of Japan no. 56p. 221–228. (in Japanese). Google Scholar

120.

Z. Tong 1978. Carboniferous and Permian Brachiopoda. In, Geological Institute of Southwest China ed. Palaeontological Atlas of Southwest China; Sichuan, Part 2. Carboniferous to Mesozoic p. 210–267. Geological Publishing House. Beijing. (in Chinese). Google Scholar

121.

F. Toula 1875. Permo-Carbon-Fossilien von der Westküste von Spitzbergen. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie, Jahrgang, 1875 p. 255–264. Google Scholar

122.

Th Tschernyschew 1902. Verkhnekamennougolnye brakhiopody Urala i Timana. Trudy Geologicheskago Komiteta vol. 16:p. 1–749. (in Russian). Google Scholar

123.

V. I. Ustritsky and G. E. Tschernjak . 1963. Biostratigrafiya i brakhiopodi verkhnego paleozoya Taymira. Trudy Instituta Geologii Arktiki vol. 134:p. 1–139. (in Russian). Google Scholar

124.

Ede Verneuil 1845. Paléontologie, mollusques, brachiopodes. In R. I. Murchison, Ede Verneuil, and Ade Keyserling , editors. Géologie de la Russie d'Europe et des Montagnes de l'Oural p. 37–294.John Murray. London and Bertrand, Paris. Google Scholar

125.

W. Waagen 1883–1884. Productus-Limestone fossils. Palaeontologia Indica, Ser. 13 vol. 1:p. 391–546.547–728. Google Scholar

126.

C. Wang and S. Zhang . 2003. Zhesi Brachiopod Fauna 210. p. Geological Publishing House. Beijing. (in Chinese). Google Scholar

127.

G. Wang, Q. Liu, Y. Jin, S. Hu, W. Liang, and Z. Liao . 1982. Phylum Brachiopoda. In, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources ed. Palaeontological Atlas of East China, pt. 2. Late Palaeozoic Volume p. 186–256. Geological Publishing House. Beijing. (in Chinese). Google Scholar

128.

H. Wang and Y. Jin . 1991. On permianellids (Brachiopoda). Acta Palaeontologica Sinica vol. 30:p. 481–501. (in Chinese). Google Scholar

129.

Y. Wang, Y. Jin, and D. Fang . 1964. Brachiopod fossils of China, pt. 1 354. p. Science Press. Beijing. (in Chinese). Google Scholar

130.

J. B. Waterhouse 1968a. The classification and descriptions of Permian Spiriferida (Brachiopoda) from New Zealand. Palaeontographica, Abt. A vol. 129:p. 1–94. Google Scholar

131.

J. B. Waterhouse 1968b. New species of Megousia Muir-Wood and Cooper and allied new genus from the Permian of Australia and North America. Journal of Paleontology vol. 42:p. 1171–1185. Google Scholar

132.

J. B. Waterhouse 1975. New Permian and Triassic brachiopod taxa. University of Queensland Papers, Department of Geology vol. 7:p. 1–23. Google Scholar

133.

J. B. Waterhouse and S. Piyasin . 1970. Mid-Permian brachiopods from Khao Phrik, Thailand. Palaeontographica, Abt. A vol. 135:p. 83–197. Google Scholar

134.

J. B. Waterhouse and J. Waddington . 1982. Systematic descriptions, paleoecology and correlations of the late Paleozoic subfamily Spiriferellinae (Brachiopoda) from the Yukon Territory and the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin 289 p. 1–73. Google Scholar

135.

A. Williams, D. A T. Harper, and R. E. Grant . 2000. Lyttoniidina. In A. Williams, C. H C. Brunton, S. J. Carlson, F. Alvarez, A. D. Ansell, P. G. Baker, M. G. Bassett, R. B. Blodgett, A. J. Boucot, J. L. Carter, L. R M. Cocks, B. L. Cohen, P. Copper, G. B. Curry, M. Cusack, A. S. Dagys, C. C. Emig, A. B. Gawthrop, R. Gourvennec, R. E. Grant, D. A T. Harper, L. E. Holmer, H-F. Hou, M. A. James, Y-G. Jin, J. G. Johnson, J. R. Laurie, S. Lazarev, D. E. Lee, S. Mackay, D. I. MacKinnon, M. O. Mancenido, M. Mergl, E. F. Owen, L. S. Peck, L. E. Popov, P. R. Racheboeuf, M. C. Rhodes, J. R. Richardson, J-Y. Rong, M. Rubel, N. M. Savage, T. N. Smirnova, D-L. Sun, D. Walton, B. Wardlaw, and A. D. Wright , editors. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part H Brachiopoda Revised, vol. 3: Linguliformea, Craniiformea, and Rhynchonelliformea (part) , p. 619–642.Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado and University of Kansas. Lawrence, Kansas. Google Scholar

136.

G. Xu 1987. Systematic descriptions; Brachiopoda. In Z. Yang , editor. et al. Permian-Triassic Boundary Stratigraphy and Fauna of South China p. 215–235. 317–326. Geological Publishing House. Beijing. (in Chinese). Google Scholar

137.

J. Yanagida 1958. The Upper Permian Mizukoshi Formation. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan vol. 64:p. 222–231. (in Japanese). Google Scholar

138.

J. Yanagida 1963. Brachiopods from the Upper Permian Mizukoshi Formation, central Kyushu. Memoirs of the Faculty of Science, Kyushu University, Ser. D vol. 14:p. 69–78. Google Scholar

139.

J. Yanagida 1970. Permian brachiopods from Khao Phrik, near Rat Buri, Thailand. Geology and Palaeontology of Southeast Asia vol. 3:p. 46–97. Google Scholar

140.

J. Yanagida and N. Nakornsri . 1999. Permian brachiopods from the Khao Hin Kling area near Phetchabun, north-central Thailand. Bulletin of the Kitakyushu Museum of Natural History no. 18p. 105–136. Google Scholar

141.

I. Yanagisawa 1967. Geology and paleontology of the Takakurayama-Yaguki area, Yotsukura-cho, Fukushima Prefecture. Science Reports of the Tohoku University, 2nd Ser vol. 39:p. 63–112. Google Scholar

142.

D. Yang 1984. Systematic description of palaeontology; Brachiopoda. In, Yichang Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources ed. Biostratigraphy of the Yangtze Gorge area, vol. 3 p. 203–239. 330–333. Geological Publishing House. Beijing. (in Chinese). Google Scholar

143.

D. Yang, S. Ni, M. Chang, and R. Zhao . 1977. Phylum Brachiopoda. In, Geological Institute of Hubei et al., eds.. Palaeontological Atlas of South-central China, pt. 2. Late Palaeozoic Volume Beijing. (in Chinese). Google Scholar

144.

S. Yang and J. Gao . 1996. Systematic description; Brachiopods. In X. Zeng, W. Zhu, X. He, F. Teng, et al , editors. Permo-Carboniferous biostratigraphy and sedimentary environment of West Qinling p. 211–218. 271–274. Geological Publishing House. Beijing. (in Chinese). Google Scholar

145.

Z. Yang, P. Ting (Ding), H. Yin, S. Zhang, and J. Fang . 1962. Carboniferous, Permian and Triassic brachiopod faunas from Chilianshan region. In, Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Geological Institute, Academia Sinica and Beijing University of Geology eds. Monograph on Geology of Chilianshan Mountains vol. 4:pt. 4129. p. Science Press. Beijing. (in Chinese). Google Scholar

146.

L. Zhan 1979. Descriptions of fossils; Brachiopoda. In H. Hou, L. Zhan, B. Chen, et al , editors. The coal-bearing strata and fossils of Late Permian from Guangtung p. 61–100. Geological Publishing House. Beijing. (in Chinese). Google Scholar

147.

Y. Zhang and Y. Ching . 1961. An Upper Permian Brachiopoda fauna from Jiangxian, Anhui Province. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica vol. 9:p. 401–417. (in Chinese). Google Scholar

148.

T. Zhu 1990. The Permian Coal-bearing Strata and Palaeobiocoenosis of Fujian 127. p. Geological Publishing House. Beijing. (in Chinese). Google Scholar

149.

A. M. Ziegler, H. L. Hulver, and D. B. Rowley . 1997. Permian world topography and climate. In I. P. Martini , editor. ed. Late Glacial and Postglacial Environmental Changes—Quaternary, Carboniferous-Permian and Proterozoic p. 111–146.Oxford University Press. New York. Google Scholar
Jun-Ichi Tazawa "Permian brachiopods from the Mizukoshi Formation, central Kyushu, SW Japan: Systematics, palaeobiogeography and tectonic implications," Paleontological Research 12(1), 37-61, (1 April 2008). https://doi.org/10.2517/1342-8144(2008)12[37:PBFTMF]2.0.CO;2
Received: 7 July 2007; Accepted: 1 November 2007; Published: 1 April 2008
KEYWORDS
Boreal-Tethyan mixed fauna
brachiopod
Kyushu
Mizukoshi Formation
Permian
southwest Japan
Back to Top