Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 April 2010 Early Pleistocene Ostracods from the Hamada Formation in the Shimokita Peninsula, Northeastern Japan: the Palaeobiogeographic Significance of their Occurrence for the Shallow-Water Fauna
Hirokazu Ozawa, Hanako Domitsu
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The early Pleistocene ostracod fauna from the Hamada Formation (ca. 1.5–1.2 Ma) was investigated in the Shimokita Peninsula, northeastern Japan. Twelve samples of this fossil fauna yielded 184 species, many of which are representative upper-shelf ostracods in the modern northeastern Japan Sea. Three biofacies were defined by Q-mode cluster analysis. The two most abundant species for each biofacies are Neonesidea sp. and Schizocythere kishinouyei in biofacies N, Buntonia hanaii and Yezocythere hayashii in biofacies B, and Laperousecythere robusta and Finmarchinella daishakaensis in biofacies L. The depositional environment of the individual biofacies can be defined as (1) upper-shelf area under open-sea influence in relatively high salinity (biofacies N), (2) inner—central-bay area, with relatively low salinity (biofacies B), and (3) bay-mouth area with intermediate salinity levels between those of (1) and (2) (biofacies L). Water depth decreased from the upper-shelf area through to the bay-mouth and then to the inner-central-bay areas during the depositional period of the studied horizons. The palaeoceanographic setting during most of the depositional period was estimated as the conditions of a water mass similar to the present Japan Sea Central Water, while surface waters were influenced by currents similar to the modern Tsugaru Warm and Oyashio Cold Currents. Based on the species content of biofacies B, Buntonia and Yezocythere commonly inhabited shallow inner-bay areas around 1.2 Ma in this region, instead of the modern representative inner-bay taxa of Japan which first appeared in the northernmost Honshu region after 1.0 Ma. The occurrence mode for extant and now-extinct species of the families Hemicytheridae, Cytheruridae and Eucytheridae suggests that the ostracod fauna in the upper-shelf environment from the Hamada Formation was similar to those from the southwestern to northeastern Japan Sea coast during the same period, even though it is situated at the easternmost extremity of the Japan Sea coastline (ca. 141°E) near the Pacific.

Introduction

The shallow-water benthic faunas at the Northwest Pacific margin of the Japanese Islands including the Japan Sea changed drastically during the Pleistocene in response to marine climatic fluctuations (e.g., Cronin and Ikeya, 1987; Chinzei, 1991; Amano, 2004). Benthic ostracods provide good clues to understanding the relationship between environmental fluctuations and faunal changes because they are sensitive to environmental changes and have a high rate of endemism due to the lack of planktic growth stages in their life cycle (e.g., Boomer et al., 2003; Cronin and Dwyer, 2003).

Previous studies have documented the changes that have occurred since the late Pliocene in the shallow-marine ostracod faunas on the Japanese side of the Japan Sea coast (e.g., Ozawa et al., 2004a, 2008; Ozawa and Kamiya, 2005a, b). These studies discussed in detail the occurrence during the Pleistocene of selected shallow-water species from the Japan Sea coast in relation to coastal environmental fluctuations. However, there are no such detailed reports for the early Pleistocene ostracod fauna during the interval 1.5 to 1.0 Ma in the shallow-water area from the easternmost coast of the Japan Sea (ca. 141°E) in northeastern Japan around the Tsugaru Strait, which connects the Japan Sea and Pacific Ocean. To date, one detailed study has given an account of the early Pleistocene ostracod fauna around this area for the interval 1.0–0.8 Ma (Tabuki, 1986; age data from Nemoto, 1997), but the faunal composition of this region during the interval 1.5–1.0 Ma is uncertain.

Figure 1.

Location maps showing the study area and sample localities for fossil ostracods of the Hamada Formation in northeastern Japan, (a): Chikagawa area, (b): Tanabu Lowland area.

f01_01.eps

The early Pleistocene Hamada Formation exposed in the Shimokita Peninsula near the Tsugaru Strait (Figure 1) is well known to contain many shallow-water, calcareous fossils representing the interval ca. 1.5–1.2 Ma (e.g., Kanazawa, 1990; Sugawara et al., 1997). However, there exists just one preliminary report by Hanai and Yamaguchi (1987) for its ostracod fauna, which revealed ca. 20 taxa. This report investigated the palaeo-biogeography of these taxa and the palaeo-environment of this sequence, but did not present a species list or SEM images of the pertinent ostracods. Since the latter half of the 1980's, many new species in the Plio-Pleistocene ostracod fauna of northeastern Japan have been described and placed in palaeo-biogeographical context (e.g., Tabuki, 1986; Tsukagoshi and Ikeya, 1987; Hanai and Ikeya, 1991; Irizuki, 1993, 1996; Ozawa and Ishii, 2008; Ozawa and Kamiya, 2008, 2009), including several occurrence reports for a small number of particular species from this stratum (e.g., Ozawa and Kamiya, 2005a). Based on previous studies alone, we are unable to produce a precise overview of the species composition of the Hamada Formation.

This study aims to fill in the gaps in the knowledge of this important area for the history of the Japan Sea with a detailed ostracod faunal list, estimates of palaeo-environment, and SEM images of many of the species. Furthermore, we discuss the palaeo-biogeographical relevance for selected ostracod species in shallow-water areas, comparing their occurrence with other coastal regions along the Japanese Islands during the Plio-Pleistocene.

Geological setting and age

The Hamada Formation is exposed in the northeastern part of the Shimokita Peninsula, northeastern Japan (Figure 1). Since this formational name was introduced by Hanzawa (1954), many authors have described its geology and calcareous fossil fauna (e.g., Kuwano, 1956; Aoki and Kuwano, 1959; Yamaguchi, 1970; Hanai and Yamaguchi, 1987). According to Haga and Yamaguchi (1990), the Hamada Formation unconformably overlies the early Miocene Tomari Formation and the middle—late Miocene Gamanosawa Formation, and is overlain unconformably by the late Pleistocene Tanabu Formation.

The Hamada Formation is mainly composed of sandstone, calcareous sandstone, silty sandstone and siltstone, intercalated with many thin layers of pumice tuff (e.g., Kanazawa, 1990). Kanazawa and Yamaguchi (1988) divided this formation into five members by lithofacies and key tuff layers in and around the type locality at the eastern coast of Mutsu Bay, i.e., the Shijimisawa Sandstone, Sakaigawa Alternation, Hatazawagawa Sandstone, Chikagawa Silty Sandstone and Okunaigawa Siltstone Members. The geological age of the Chikagawa Silty Sandstone and Okunaigawa Siltstone Members of the Hamada Formation in and around the type locality was estimated at between 1.45 and 1.21 Ma based on calcareous-nannofossil biostratigraphy (Sugawara et al., 1997; age from Sato et al., 1999). Therefore these two members date to ca. 1.5–1.2 Ma on the basis of planktic microfossil records.

According to Kuwano (1957), a part of the Hamada Formation mainly consisting of sandy siltstone is also exposed at a seaside cliff in the Tanabu Lowland area on the northernmost side of the Shimokita Peninsula (Figure 1b). This is correlated to the uppermost part of the same facies in and around the type locality based on lithology, although there are presently no age data for these strata in the Tanabu area. The late Pleistocene Tanabu Formation and terrace deposits unconformably overlie the Hamada Formation in the Tanabu area, but there are no exposures showing their contact with it. No calcareous fossils occurred in the outcrops, and only casts of molluscan fossils and burrows were found. Only siltstone fragments found around the coastal cliff, which probably originated from outcrops of the Hamada Formation in this area, contained fossils with preserved calcareous parts. Kuwano (1957) examined several siltstone fragments and briefly reported occurrences of molluscan and foraminifer fossils.

Materials and methods

Ten sediment samples H1–H10 of the Hamada Formation in the Chikagawa area near its type locality were collected for microfossil analysis from outcrops along the lower reaches of the Chikagawa River, on the eastern coast of Mutsu Bay, northern Shimokita Peninsula, Aomori Prefecture, northeastern Japan (Figures 1a and 2). These samples were obtained from the calcareous fine—medium sandstone and silty sandstone in the Chikagawa Silty Sandstone Member and the siltstone in the Okunaigawa Siltstone Member.

We also examined for ostracods (Figure 1b) three samples (nos. 185, 210 and 204) from the Tanabu Lowland area that were numbered and studied by Kuwano (1957). These consist of sandy silt sediments that infilled burrow fossils; these sediments probably were supplied by outcrops of the Hamada Formation near the seaside cliff of three localities (nos. 9, 18 and 20, respectively) of Kuwano (1957).

Dried samples of about 20 g weight were washed through a 63-µm (250-mesh) sieve, and then oven-dried. Approximately 200 ostracod individuals were picked from these samples in fractions between 0.25–1.0 mm for each sample split, under a binocular microscope. All the specimens examined here were deposited at the Department of Geology, National Museum of Nature and Science, Tokyo, Japan.

Q-mode cluster analysis was conducted to determine the fossil ostracod biofacies on the basis of similarities between samples with respect to ostracod species composition, based on the Pearson correlation coefficient and the unweighed pair-group average (UPGMA) using the free software PAST (Paleontological Statistics) version 1.82 ( http://folk.uio.no/ohammer/past/; Hammer et al., 2001). Samples containing more than ca. 200 specimens were used for this study. Within these samples, only specimens that were represented by more than three specimens in any one sample were utilized for this analysis.

Figure 2.

A columnar section with sample horizons of the Chikagawa area. Names of six tuff layers represent key tuff layers of Kanazawa and Yamaguchi (1988).

f02_01.eps

Results

Occurrence of ostracods

In total, 184 ostracod species (Figures 35; Table 1) were identified from the 12 samples. Ten samples H1–H9 from the Chikagawa area and no. 204 from the Tanabu Lowland area include more than ca. 200 individuals. Two samples nos. 185 and 210 contain small numbers of ostracods, less than 20 individuals, and one sample H10 yielded no ostracods. The total number of species for each sample, including more than ca. 200 individuals, ranged from 50 to 75 (Figure 6; Table 1). The range of species diversity in these samples, calculated by the Shannon—Wever function, was ca. 3.15–3.85, and the absolute abundance (=number of individuals per 10 gram sediment) for each sample was 180–1,660 (Figure 6) except for the two aforementioned samples nos. 185 and 210 from the Tanabu area which each yielded very few individuals (Table 1).

The eleven most abundant species are Neonesidea sp., Finmarchinella daishakaensis, Cythere sanrikuensis, Laperousecythere robusta, Schizocythere kishinouyei, Aurila tsukawakii, Cythere urupensis, Johnnealella nopporensis,Semicytherura subundata, Schizocythere okhotskensis and Yezocythere hayashii (Figure 6; Tables 1 and 2). They accounted for 45.6% of the total population. Another nine species, Aurila hataii, Baffinicythere ishizakii, Buntonia hanaii, Cytheropteron sawanense, Daishakacythere posterocostata, Finmarchinella japonica s.l., Hemicythere emarginata, Howeina sp. 2 and Yezocythere sp., are commonly found from many horizons (Tables 1 and 2). These twenty species accounted for ca. 60% of the total individuals. The rest of the other 164 species accounted for 40% of the total population.

Figure 3.

SEM images of fossil ostracods from the Hamada Formation (Part 1). LV: left valve, RV: right valve. 1. Acanthocythereis dunelmensis s.l. (Norman, 1865), male LV, from H9. 2. Acanthocythereis tsurugasakensis Tabuki, 1986, juvenile LV, from H3. 3. Acuticythereis? sp., juvenile LV, from H4. 4. Aponesidea? sp., juvenile LV, from H2. 5. Argilloecia sp., female RV, from H8. 6. Aurila hataii Ishizaki, 1968, female RV, from H7. 7. Aurila tsukawakii, female RV, from H7. 8. Baffinicythere ishizakii Irizuki, 1996, juvenile LV, from H2. 9. Baffinicythere reticulata Irizuki, 1996, juvenile LV, from H8. 10. Baffinicythere robusticostata Irizuki, 1996, female RV, from 204. 11. Buntonia hanaii Yajima, 1978, male RV, from H8. 12. Bythoceratina sp. 1, female LV, from H1. 13. Callistocythere setanensis Hanai, 1957, female LV, from H7. 14. Cornucoquimba alata (Tabuki, 1986), female RV, from H4. 15. Cornucoquimba sp. cf. C. moniwensis (Ishizaki, 1966), female RV, from H4. 16. Cornucoquimbu moniwensis (Ishizaki, 1966), male LV, from H4. 17. Cornucoquimbu saitoi (Ishizaki, 1963), male RV, from H2. 18. Cornucoquimba sp. 1, female antero-dorsally broken RV, from H8. 19. Cornucoquimba sp. 2, male RV, from H7. 20. Cythere hunaii Tsukagoshi & Ikeya, 1987, female LV, from H1. 21. Cythere sunrikuensis Tsukagoshi & Ikeya, 1987, female LV, from H6. 22. Cythere urupensis Schornikov, 1974, female LV, from H7. 23. Cytheropteron sp. cf. C. arcuatum Brady et al., 1874, female RV, from 204. 24. Cytheropteron sp. 1, female RV, from 204. 25. Cytheropteron sp. cf. C. eremitum Hanai, 1957, female RV, from H6. 26. Cytheropteron sp. 2, female RV, from 204. 27. Cytheropteron sp. 8, female RV, from 204. 28. Cytheropteron sp. 6, female LV, from 204. 29. Cytheropteron sp. 3, female RV, from H4. 30. Cytheropteron sp. 4, female RV, from H4. 31. Cytheropteron sp. 7, female LV, from H4. 32. Cytheropteron yujimui Tabuki, 1986, female LV, from H3.

f03_01.eps

Figure 4.

SEM images of fossil ostracods from the Hamada Formation (Part 2). LV: left valve, RV: right valve. 1. Cytheropteron? sp. 1, female posteriorly broken LV, from H8. 2. Cytheruru? sp. 1, female RV, from H8. 3. Daishakacythere abei (Tabuki, 1986), juvenile LV, from H7. 4. Daishakacythere posterocostata (Tabuki, 1986), juvenile RV, from H8. 5. Elofsonella sp. cf. E. concinna (Jones, 1857), female LV, from H8. 6. Finmarchinella daishakaensis Tabuki, 1986, male LV, from H8. 7. Finmarchinella hanaii Okada, 1979, male LV, from H1. 8. Finmarchinella japonica s.l. Ishizaki, 1966, male LV, from 204. 9. Finmarchinella rectangulata Tabuki, 1986, female RV, from H2. 10. Hemicythere emarginata (Sars, 1865), male LV, from H7. 11. Hemicythere sp. 1, juvenile LV, from H3. 12. Hemicythere kitanipponica (Tabuki, 1986), female RV, from H8. 13. Hemicythere orientalis Schornikov, 1974, female RV, from H4. 14. Hemicythere sp. cf. H. orientalis Schornikov, 1974, female RV, from H8. 15. Hemicythere ochotensis Schornikov, 1974, female RV, from H7. 16. Hemicythere quadrinodosa Schornikov, 1974, juvenile RV, from H8. 17. Hemicythere sp. 2, juvenile RV, from H3. 18. Hemicythere? sp. 1, male RV, from H6. 19. Howeina sp. 4, female RV, from H8. 20. Howeina sp. 1, male LV, from H9. 21. Howeina leptocytheroideu (Hanai, 1957), female RV, from H7. 22. Howeina sp. 3, male RV, from H8. 23. Howeina sp. 2, female RV, from H8. 24. Johnnealella nopporensis Hanai & Ikeya, 1991, female RV, from 204. 25. Kotoracythere sp. 1, female LV, from H3. 26. Krithe sp., male RV, from H3. 27. Luperousecythere robustu (Tabuki, 1986), female LV, from 204. 28. Laperousecythere sp. 4, juvenile LV, from H4. 29. Laperousecythere sasaokensis (Irizuki, 1993), female LV, from H5. 30. Laperousecythere sp. 2, juvenile RV, from H4. 31. Laperousecythere sp. 3, male RV, from H3. 32. Loxoconcha sp. cf. L. kitunipponica Ishizaki, 1971, male RV, from H6.

f04_01.eps

Figure 5.

SEM images of fossil ostracods from the Hamada Formation (Part 3). LV: left valve, RV: right valve. 1. Loxoconcha epeterseni Ishizaki, 1981, female LV, from H6. 2. Loxoconcha kumiyai Ozawa & Ishii, 2008, female RV, from H7. 3. Loxoconcha kumiyai Ozawa & Ishii, 2008, juvenile RV, from H8. 4. Loxoconcha ozawai Tabuki, 1986, juvenile LV, from H8. 5. Loxoconcha subkotoraforma Ishizaki, 1966, female LV, from H8. 6. Neonesidea sp., female LV, from H5. 7. Normunicythere juponica Tabuki, 1986, male RV, from H1. 8. Palmenella limicola (Norman, 1865), female LV, from H9. 9. Robertsonites reticuliformus (Ishizaki, 1966), juvenile LV, from H9. 10. Robustaurila sp. cf. R. salebrosa (Brady, 1869), female RV, from H4. 11. Schizocythere ikeyai Tsukagoshi & Briggs, 1998, female LV, from 204. 12. Schizocythere kishinouyei (Kajiyama, 1913), female LV, from H7. 13. Schizocythere okhotskensis Hanai, 1970, female RV, from 204. 14. Semicytherura hiberna Okubo, 1980, male LV, from H2. 15. Semicytherura subundata (Hanai, 1957), female LV, from H1. 16. Semicytherura robustundata Ozawa & Kamiya, 2008, female LV, from H1. 17. Semicytherura sp. 2, female RV, from H1. 18. Semicytherura tanimurui Ozawa & Kamiya, 2008, female RV, from H8. 19. Xestoleberis hanaii Ishizaki, 1968, female LV, from H6. 20. Xestoleberis iturupicu Schornikov, 1974, female RV, from H3. 21. Xestoleberis sagamiensis Kajiyama, 1913, female LV, from H7. 22. Xestoleberis setouchiensis Okubo, 1979, female LV, from H7. 23. Yezocythere hayashii Hanai & Ikeya, 1991, female LV, from H8. 24. Yezocythere sp., female LV, from 204.

f05_01.eps

Most of these species are found together in sandy and calcareous sandy sediments on the present-day upper shelf in the northeastern Japan Sea off Hokkaido (e.g., Ozawa et al., 1999, 2004a; Ozawa, 2003). Species of two genera, Cythere and Xestoleberis, commonly occur in all horizons (the graph of phytal species in Figure 6; Table 1). Species of these genera are phytal dwellers on calcareous algae of rocky shores and on the eelgrass Zostera in the sandy substrate near the intertidal zone along the modern Japanese coast (e.g., Tsukagoshi and Ikeya, 1987; Kamiya, 1988; Sato and Kamiya, 2007).

Table 1.

Occurrence list of fossil ostracods from the Hamada Formation.

t01a_01.gif

continued

t01b_01.gif

continued

t01c_01.gif

Table 2.

20 most abundant ostracod species, their individual numbers and their percentages against all individuals from the Hamada Formation.

t02_01.gif

Ostracod biofacies

Three fossil biofacies N, L and B were defined by the Qmode cluster analysis using 104 species based on a ca. 0.2 level (Figure 7). The three most abundant species of each biofacies are Neonesidea sp., Laperousecythere robusta and Buntonia hanaii (Table 3).

The most abundant species in biofacies N is Neonesidea sp., which forms ca. 16% on average of the seven samples (Table 3). It is commonly accompanied by Schizocythere kishinouyei, Aurila tsukawakii, Cythere sanrikuensis and Finmarchinella daishakaensis with common or rare occurrences for Aurila hataii, Baffinicythere spp., Cornucoquimbu alata, Cytheropteron sawanense, Daishakacythere spp., Finmarchinella japonica, Hemicythere orientalis, Johnnealella nopporensis, Laperousecythere robusta, Schizo-cythere okhotskensis and Xestoleberis iturupica (Figure 6; Tables 1 and 3). This biofacies characterizes the seven lower to middle horizons H1–H7 of the Chikagawa area in calcareous fine- to medium-grained sandstone (Figures 6 and 7).

Figure 6.

Vertical changes of the relative frequency (%) of selected ostracod taxa from the Hamada Formation (Chikagawa area) of each sample and data of the species number and absolute abundance (=ostracod individual number per 10 g sediment) of each sample, with a columnar section and sample horizons. Phytal species: Cythere spp. and Xestoleberis spp. JSCW (Japan Sea Central Water) species: Baffinicythere ishizukii, Baffinicythere robusticostata, Cornucoquimba alata, Daishakacythere abei, Daishakacythere posterocostata, Finmarchinella nealei, Hemicythere orientalis, Howeina camptocytheroideu, Howeina leptocytheroidea, Johnnealella nopporensis and Munseyella hatatatensis. JSI-PW (Japan Sea Intermediate-Proper Water) species: Acanthocythereis dunelmensis, Elofsonella sp. cf. E. concinna, Palmenella limicola and Robertsonites reticuliforma. Biofacies N, L and B are the same as those in Figure 7.

f06_01.eps

Neonesidea sp. has been mainly reported in calcareous sandy sediments on the present-day upper shelf in the northeastern Japan Sea off Hokkaido (e.g., Ozawa et al., 1999; Tsukawaki et al., 2001). Most of the other 15 taxa are typical of biofacies from the upper shelf under the influence of the open sea at a water depth of 50–100 m in calcareous sandy and sandy sediments in the northeastern Japan Sea. This area is under the influence of the Japan Sea Central Water mass, which has a water temperature of around 10°C in summer and less than 5°C in winter, salinity of around 34 psu, and a high dissolved oxygen content of 6–9 ml/1 (e.g., Kuwahara, 1990; Ikeya and Cronin, 1993; Ozawa, 2003). Biofacies N is characterized by relatively high numbers of species (62– 75) and a high species diversity of ca. 3.30–3.85 (Figure 6; Table 2).

The most abundant species of Biofacies L is Laperousecythere robusta, making up more than 12 % on average of the two samples (Table 3). It is accompanied by Finmarchinella daishakaensis, Johnnealella nopporensis, Yezocythere sp., Cythere sanrikuensis, Baffinicythere spp., Daishakacythere posterocostata and Yezocythere hayashii in common to rare occurrences (Figure 6; Tables 1 and 3). This biofacies is found from the upper horizon H8 of the Chikagawa area in the silty sandstone sample and no. 204 of the Tanabu area in the sandy siltstone sample (Figures 6 and 7). Another two samples from the Tanabu area (nos. 185 and 210), which include just small numbers of ostracod individuals, have a similar species composition to biofacies L (Table 1).

Laperousecythere robusta, Johnnealella nopporensis, Baffinicythere spp. and Daishakacythere posterocostata are mainly reported from the Recent upper shelf at 50–100 m water depth in sandy sediments in the northeastern Japan Sea off Hokkaido (e.g., Ozawa et al., 1999; Ozawa, 2003). Finmarchinella daishakaensis is an extinct species, which appears to have inhabited the upper-shelf area of the Japan Sea until the middle Pleistocene (e.g., Ozawa and Kamiya, 2005a). Yezocythere sp. is probably an extinct species, but often occurs in the fossil biofacies of shallow inner—central-bay areas from the early Pleistocene in and around the Japan Sea coasts (Paik and Lee, 1988; Ozawa, 1996; Ozawa and Kamiya, 2001). Cythere species inhabit calcareous algae near the intertidal zone (e.g., Tsukagoshi and Ikeya, 1987), and their carapaces are often found from central-bay and bay-mouth areas (e.g., Kamiya et al., 2001).

Figure 7.

Dendrogram showing the result of the Q-mode cluster analysis. H1–H9, 204: sample number. Biofacies N, L and B are the same as those in Figure 6.

f07_01.eps

Most of these extant species are commonly distributed in sandy sediments on the upper shelf in open sea areas at a present water depth of 50–100 m in the northeastern Japan Sea off Hokkaido. This area is under the prevailing conditions of the Japan Sea Central Water mass, which has a water temperature of around 10°C in summer and less than 5°C in winter, a salinity of around 34 psu, and a high dissolved oxygen content of 6–9 ml/l (e.g., Ozawa, 2003). Biofacies L is characterized by relatively high numbers of species (64– 74) and a high species diversity, ca. 3.36–3.69 (Figure 6; Table 2).

Biofacies B is dominated by Buntonia hanaii, at 17 % of the total number of specimens (Figure 6; Table 3). It is accompanied by Yezocythere hayashii, Robertsonites reticuliformus, Cythere sanrikuensis, Cythere urupensis, Yezocythere sp., Palmenella limicola, Amphileberis nipponica and Acanthocythereis dunelmensis in common occurrences (Figure 6; Tables 1 and 3). This biofacies was found just from the uppermost horizon H9 of the Chikagawa area in one siltstone sample (Figures 6 and 7).

Table 3.

Five dominant species of each biofacies, their average percentages in all samples of each assemblage, their maximum percentage in a single sample, and the range of species number and species diversity index from the Hamada Formation.

t03_01.gif

Buntonia hanaii is dominantly reported from present-day inner-central-bay areas in 30–10 m water depth from silty and sandy sediments in the northeastern Japan Sea, accompanied by Amphileberis nipponica (e.g., Ikeya et al., 1992). Water conditions consist of a temperature of around 20°C in summer and around 5°C in winter, a salinity of around 33 psu, and a dissolved oxygen content of 3–6 ml/l (e.g., Terazaki and Shikama, 1979; Nagamine et al., 1982; Ikeya and Itoh, 1991; Ikeya et al., 1992). Yezocythere hayashii is often found from the Recent upper shelf under open-water conditions in the Japan Sea off Hokkaido (e.g., Ozawa et al., 1999). However, it also dominantly inhabits central-bay areas, such as the modern Aomori Bay, at 20–50 m water depth (Ishizaki, 1971) near the Chikagawa area. In this area the water temperature is around 15°C in summer and less than 5°C in winter, salinity is around 33 psu due to a slight freshwater influence, and dissolved oxygen is relatively low at 3–6 ml/l (e.g., Nagamine et al., 1982; Ozawa et al., 2004a). Yezocythere sp., which is the same species as Yezocythere sp. in Biofacies L (Table 1), is possibly now extinct, but often occurs in the fossil biofacies of the inner central bay together with Yezocythere hayashii from early Pleistocene strata on the Japan Sea coast (e.g., Ozawa, 1996; Ozawa and Kamiya, 2001). Cythere species inhabit calcareous algae near the intertidal zone (e.g., Tsukagoshi and Ikeya, 1987), and their carapaces are often found from shallow central-bay and bay-mouth areas (e.g., Kamiya et al., 2001). Robertsonites reticuliformus, Palmenella limicola and Acanthocythereis dunelmensis are dominantly or commonly distributed in the Japan Sea in silty sediments on the lower shelf and continental slope in the deep-water region under the influence of the Japan Sea Intermediate—Proper Water mass (e.g., Ikeya and Suzuki, 1992; Ozawa, 2003, 2004). This water mass has a temperature of around or less than 5°C throughout the year, a salinity of around 34 psu, and relatively high dissolved oxygen levels of 5–6 ml/l (e.g., Ikeya and Cronin, 1993; Ozawa et al., 2004b; Ozawa and Kamiya, 2005b). This biofacies is characterized by the lowest number of species, 50, and lowest species diversity, ca. 3.15, among the studied samples (Figure 6; Tables 1 and 3).

Discussion

Stratigraphical changes in the depositional environment in the Chikagawa area

The palaeo-environment for the seven lower to middle horizons H1–H7 based on the occurrence of biofacies N is the upper shelf at 50–100 m water depth influenced by the open sea (Figure 6) similar to the modern Japan Sea Central Water under conditions of relatively high salinity of around 34 psu and high dissolved oxygen levels of 6–9 ml/l. The palaeo-environment in the uppermost horizon of H9 (biofacies B) is the shallow inner—central—bay area (Figure 6) in 10–50 m water depth, under conditions of relatively low salinity of around 33 psu, slightly influenced by freshwater, and dissolved oxygen levels of 3–6 ml/l. The surmised water depth decreased upwards in the sequence during the depositional period in the studied horizons, from 50–100 m to 10–50 m. The influence of the open sea in this area became weaker during the time of deposition of the uppermost horizon H9 compared with the lower to middle horizons H1–H7.

Biofacies L, found in only one horizon, H8, indicates a bay-mouth palaeo-environment (Figure 6) in intermediate conditions of water depth, salinity and dissolved oxygen, between upper-shelf and inner—central-bay environments, i.e., around 50 m depth, salinity 33–34 psu, and dissolved oxygen level around 6 ml/l, estimated from biofacies N and B respectively.

The horizon H8 is characterized by a mixture of ostracod species characteristic of the inner-central-bay and upper shelf of the Japan Sea, with the highest absolute abundance of ostracods and the second highest number of species. One dominant species, Finmarchinella daishakaensis, probably is extinct, but is judged to have dwelled in shallow open-sea water, because it occurs in shallow open-sea assemblages of the early Pleistocene (e.g., Tabuki, 1986; Ozawa and Kamiya, 2005a). The horizon H8 is thus inferred to have been deposited during a regressive period based on changes in the ostracod assemblages (Figure 6).

The ostracods in this silty sandstone might signify a relatively low rate of deposition, due to a period of reduced sediment supply (e.g., Kamataki, 1999; Ozawa and Kamiya, 2005b), at least in part during the regressive phase from upper-shelf to inner—central-bay environments. A regressive phase could induce a period of relatively increased concentration of fossils due at least in part to reworking of upper-shelf species, e.g., Neonesidea sp. and Schizocythere kishinouyei, from strata exposed during the regression.

Species such as Buntonia hanaii, Yezocythere hayashii and Yezocythere sp. in the H8 horizon, however, cannot have been all reworked from the directly underlying strata, because they are absent or very rare in those layers (Figure 6). This implies that they lived at or around the site during the time of deposition of H8, although the relative abundance of Buntonia hanaii was similar to an earlier period (H3 horizon).

The palaeo-water temperature conditions for the two biofacies N and L in horizons H1–H8 are similar to those in the upper-shelf environment of the northeastern Japan Sea off Hokkaido based on the species composition of ostracods.

Biofacies B is characterized by an unique mixture of shallow inner—central-bay species (Buntonia hanaii and Amphileberis nipponica) and Japan Sea Intermediate-Proper Water (JSI-PW) species of the lower shelf and slope (Robertsonites reticuliformus, Palmenella limicola and Acanthocythereis dunelmensis) with species also inhabiting the central bay such as Aomori Bay (Yezocythere hayashii) and probable inner-bay species (Yezocythere sp.). The state of fossil preservation of the species listed above in biofacies B is almost the same (Figures 35). This type of biofacies is not known along the present coast of Japan, but a similar combination of ostracod species from these two different habitats was also reported from late Pliocene—early Pleistocene biofacies in other areas of the Japan Sea coast (e.g., Omma Formation, ca. 2.1–1.7 Ma; Ozawa and Kamiya, 2001).

In the modern Arctic region, Robertsonites reticuliformus, Palmenella limicola and Acanthocythereis dunelmensis are distributed in waters shallower than 50 m with a temperature of less than 6°C (Ikeya and Cronin, 1993). The latter two species are mainly found in the northern Pacific in waters 20–100 m in depth with a temperature of around 5°C, dissolved oxygen levels of 2–7 ml/l and salinity less than 33 psu (Brouwers, 1988, 1990, 1993). Athersuch et al. (1989) recorded Acanthocythereis dunelmensis from the shallow sea (at depths around 50 m) in the northern Atlantic and Arctic Oceans. Robinson (1978) reported characteristic occurrences of Acanthocythereis dunelmensis with shallow-water species from late Pleistocene strata in England, and inferred that this species occurred in shallower inshore environments in the cold periods of the Pleistocene. Buntonia hanaii mainly inhabits the shallow inner—central-bay area with a wide geographical range from the coasts of eastern China to northeastern Japan (e.g., Zhao and Wang, 1988; Ikeya et al., 1992). Therefore, the only environment where we could expect to see abundant occurrences of these species in biofacies B would be shallow inner—central-bay areas under conditions of lower temperatures in summer (around 5°C) than is the case in the present bays of northeastern Japan.

Common occurrences of phytal species of two genera, Cythere and Xestoleberis, from all the horizons H1–H9 (Figure 6) indicate the existence of abundant beds of the seaweed Zostera on the sandy bottom and calcareous algae on the rocky shore near the intertidal zone in this area throughout the depositional period.

Several studies have previously reconstructed the palaeoenvironment of the Hamada Formation, based on benthic ostracod, molluscan and foraminifer fossils. For example, Hanai and Yamaguchi (1987) preliminarily represented the occurrence data of ca. 20 ostracod taxa between our horizons H1–H10 from the same section (their horizons C33–C4). Generally, the faunal compositions of dominant/common species and estimates of palaeo-environments they arrived at are similar to those of our study. However, they reported one biofacies dominantly consisting of species that indicate a lower-shelf to upper continental slope area under the conditions of the JSI-PW (species of genera Acanthocythereis, Robertsonites and Elofsonella) from their samples C22 and C24. We have not found a similar type of biofacies, but our sample H3 shows a small peak in the percentage (ca. 5%) for species of these three genera (JSI-PW species in Figure 6). So, our sample H3 is the most similar to their samples C22 or C24 including the deep-water biofacies of Hanai and Yamaguchi (1987), although their and our samples were collected from slightly different horizons.

Kanazawa (1990) reported the species composition of the molluscan fauna between our horizons H5–H10 at the same section in detail (his horizons C20–C1). He judged the palaeo-environment for our horizons H5–H8 of the Chikagawa Sandstone Member as the upper-shelf area under open-water conditions. In the Okunaigawa Siltstone Member (our horizon H9), the palaeo-environment was inferred to be a shallow bay.

Nemoto and Yoshimoto (2001) reported the species composition of the benthic foraminifer fauna between our horizons H1–H10 at the same section in detail, and recognized three fossil biofacies of benthic foraminifers (their horizons CHI19–CHI1). Two of their biofacies from the Chikagawa Sandstone Member consist of many upper-shelf species, while the third one, from the Okunaigawa Siltstone Member, includes many shallow inner-bay species.

The palaeo-environmental change reconstructed from our new ostracod data of the Chikagawa area is almost consistent with that of previous ostracod, molluscan and benthic foraminifer studies. Furthermore, our ostracod study estimates three types of environments (Figure 6) with more detailed information on the water depth, salinity and dissolved oxygen levels than previous studies. We define three periods of decreasing water depth during the depositional period of the studied horizons (Figure 6), and the existence of a period of relatively low rate of sedimentation around horizon H8. Our ostracod data also reconstruct occurrences of calcareous algae on the rocky shore and beds of the seaweed Zostera on the sandy bottom near the intertidal zone in this area throughout the depositional period.

Palaeoceanographic conditions of surface water

Hanai and Yamaguchi (1987) reported the fossil occurrence of Cythere omotenipponica from this formation. They estimated a shallow-marine environment influenced by a warm-water current based on its occurrence from two localities (their horizons C18 and C12). However, our study has found no specimens of this species (Table 1), possibly because we studied fewer samples than they did. Instead of Cythere omotenipponica, we found many individuals of Cythere sanrikuensis and Cythere urupensis from all the horizons (Table 1). Hanai and Yamaguchi (1987) also reported the occurrences of these two species from here.

According to Tsukagoshi (1996), Recent specimens of Cythere sanrikuensis only inhabit the intertidal zone of the Pacific coast of northern Honshu and southern Hokkaido in areas influenced by the Tsugaru Warm Current, a branch of the Tsushima Warm Current. Recent specimens of Cythere urupensis are only found in the intertidal zone of the Pacific coast of eastern Hokkaido under the influence of the Oyashio Cold Current. So, these fossil occurrences indicate that the surface water environment during the interval 1.5 to 1.2 Ma in the study area was influenced by currents similar to both the Tsugaru Warm and Oyashio Cold Currents, like the modern oceanographic setting around the Shimokita Peninsula. Therefore, in the shallow-marine environment of this area, a water mass similar to the present Japan Sea Central Water existed under two kinds of surface waters, similar to the modern Tsugaru Warm and Oyashio Cold Currents.

In regard to the palaeoceanography of the surface water in the northwestern Pacific margin since the late Pliocene, Koya (1995) analyzed diatom assemblages from deep-sea cores of DSDP Sites 436, 438 and 440 off the Sanriku region of northern Honshu Island. His study concluded that the surface-water environment in the northwestern Pacific off northern Honshu had shifted to an oceanographic setting resembling the modern water-current conditions ca. 2 Ma (age scale cited from Motoyama et al., 2004), probably related to the climatic cooling in the Northern Hemisphere since the late Pliocene.

Furthermore, in relation to the Japan Sea coast, Ozawa and Kamiya (2001) studied early Pleistocene ostracod assemblages from central Japan. According to their study, the influx during interglacials of the Tsushima Warm Current from the East China Sea into the Japan Sea at a volume comparable to the present began 1.5 Ma at the latest. Thus, the volume of the Tsugaru Warm Current, which is a branch of the Tsushima Warm Current, through the Tsugaru Strait from the Japan Sea to the northwestern Pacific margin, has been similar to modern conditions since 1.5 Ma.

Therefore our results for ostracod occurrences in the Hamada Formation (ca. 1.5–1.2 Ma) for two Cythere species (Table 1), inhabiting intertidal areas under the influence of both the Tsugaru Warm and Oyashio Cold Currents, respectively, are concordant with previous palaeoceanographic studies around northern Honshu during this period.

Age and depositional environment of the fragment samples from the Tanabu area

From three samples of sandy siltstone fragments (nos. 185, 204 and 210 of Kuwano, 1957) in the Tanabu Lowland area, planktic foraminifer fossils of Neogloboquadrina pachyderma, which first appeared at 1.25±0.04 Ma (Domitsu and Oda, 2008), were obtained in sediment fractions between 0.125–1.0 mm for each sample, by one of the authors in this study (H. Domitsu). Additionally, Neogloboquadrina inglei, which has a last occurrence age of 0.73±0.05 Ma (Domitsu and Oda, 2008), was obtained from one of these samples (no. 204). No calcareous nannofossils were found from these samples. Therefore, these Tanabu samples were dated to younger than ca. 1.3 Ma at the latest based on the occurrence of Neogloboquadrina pachyderma. Furthermore, one of the three samples (no. 204) was dated to ca. 1.3–0.7 Ma, based on the cooccurrence of the above two planktic foraminifer species and biostratigraphy of ODP Site 1150 (located at 39°11′N, 143°20′E and 2,681 m water depth) in the Pacific off northeastern Japan (Domitsu and Oda, 2008).

In the biofacies L of the Tanabu area in sample no. 204, Laperousecythere robusta, Yezocythere sp. and Yezocythere hayashii are dominantly or commonly found (Table 1). So the palaeo-environment there during a restricted period between ca. 1.3–0.7 Ma is judged to have been a bay-mouth area around 50 m depth, salinity 33–34 psu, and dissolved oxygen level around 6 ml/l, based on occurrences both of upper-shelf species, e.g., Laperousecythere robusta (50–100 m water depths in the Japan Sea off Hokkaido; e.g., Ozawa et al., 1999) and central-bay species Yezocythere hayashii (20–50 m in Aomori Bay; Ishizaki, 1971) with the probable inner—central-bay species Yezocythere sp. (e.g., Ozawa, 1996).

Significant occurrences of bay species

The biofacies B in the siltstone from the Chikagawa area commonly includes several inner—central-bay species such as Buntonia hanaii, Yezocythere spp. and Amphileberis nipponica. However, it contains no individuals of the taxa which today dominate silty sediments in the shallow innerbay environment around Japan as reported by Ikeya and Shiozaki (1993), i.e., the Bicornucythere species group and Spinileberis quadriaculeata (Figure 6; Tables 1 and 3). At present, Buntonia hanaii and Yezocythere hayashii dominantly or commonly inhabit the inner-central-bay environments in northern Honshu (ca. 40–41°N), such as Aomori and Otsuchi Bays, alongside the above taxa (e.g., Ishizaki, 1971; Ikeya et al., 1992).

Figure 8.

Temporal changes of occurrences of the selected now-extinct ostracod species at the Japan Sea coast, modified from Ozawa and Kamiya (2005a) and Ozawa (2007), with the location map of strata. Cited literature for ostracod occurrences; a: Ishizaki and Matoba (1985), b: Tabuki (1986), c: Cronin and Ikeya (1987), d: Irizuki (1993), e: Irizuki (1996), f: Ishida (unpubl. data), g: Irizuki and Ishida (2007), h: Ozawa and Kamiya (2008), i: this study (Chikagawa area). Cited literature for age data; Takayama et al. (1988), Kato et al. (1995), Okubo et al. (1995), Nemoto (1997), Shirai et al. (1997), Sugawara et al. (1997), Nojo et al. (1999), Sato et al. (1999), Takata (2000), and Yamada et al. (2002). Age of epochs; (A): -1.5 Ma, (B): 1.2–1.0 Ma, (C): 0.9 Ma, (D): 0.8–0.5 Ma, (E): 0.4–0.25 Ma, (F): 0.1 Ma.

f08_01.eps

Table 4.

Synonym list of ostracod species from the Hamada Formation.

t04_01.gif

Fossils of the Bicornucythere species group and Spinileberis quadriaculeata are mainly found from deposits dating from the late Pliocene (ca. 3 Ma) onwards along the Pacific and Japan Sea coasts of central Honshu-Kyushu (south of ca. 36°N) (Abe, 1983; Ishizaki, 1983; Cronin et al., 1994; Kamiya et al., 2001; Nakao et al., 2001; Iwatani and Irizuki, 2008). Many individuals of Yezocythere hayashii, Yezocythere sp. and the Bicornucythere species group are found together in the shallow-bay biofacies between 2.1–1.2 Ma from the Japan Sea coast, central Honshu (Ozawa, 1996; Ozawa and Kamiya, 2001). Buntonia hanaii, the Bicornucythere species group and Spinileberis quadriaculeata are found together in a shallow-bay biofacies sample taken from a Lower Pleistocene formation (ca. 1.4 Ma) of the Kazusa Group in the Tama Hills, central Honshu (Ozawa, unpubl. data).

Therefore Buntonia hanaii and Yezocythere spp. commonly inhabited the inner—central-bay environment in the Shimokita area around 1.2 Ma, instead of the Bicomucythere species group and Spinileberis quadriaculeata. The latter taxa must have migrated from south to northernmost Honshu (41°N) after ca. 1.0 Ma, based on their fossil occurrences from south of Aomori City near the Shimokita area (Daishaka Formation, 1.0–0.8 Ma; Tabuki, 1986; age from Nemoto, 1997). Fossil records of Spinileberis quadriaculeata during or before 1.5–1.2 Ma are reported just from south of 36°N, i.e., central Honshu and the Okinawa Islands (e.g., Nohara, 1987; Ozawa, unpubl. data). So its late appearance in northernmost Honshu might simply be a function of the migration distance from southern Japan to central and then to northernmost Honshu. The reasons are still uncertain for the late appearance in northernmost Honshu of the Bicor nucythere species group, which had already colonized northeastern Japan (ca. 40°N) by around 2 Ma along the Japan Sea coast (Ishizaki and Matoba, 1985). Thus the late appearance of this genus in northernmost Honshu might be caused by other factors.

Significant occurrences of now-extinct species

Temporal changes of now-extinct species of the three ostracod families Hemicytheridae, Cytheruridae and Eucytheridae from the southwestern to northeastern Japan Sea coast of Japan since the late Pliocene (ca. 2 Ma) have previously been reported in detail (Figure 8, Table 4; Ozawa and Kamiya, 2005a; Ozawa, 2006, 2007). According to Ozawa and Kamiya (2008), Semicytherura tanimurai is also a now-extinct species of Cytheruridae, and has a pattern of fossil occurrence similar to that of other now-extinct species as indicated by Ozawa and Kamiya (2005a) and Ozawa (2006, 2007). Their data are added to Figure 8 of this study, which shows occurrences of now-extinct species of the three families. According to previous studies (Ozawa and Kamiya, 2005a; Ozawa, 2006, 2007), these species were present until 2 Ma at the latest along the Japan Sea coast, and then most of them became extinct during the middle Pleistocene within this isolated marginal sea, probably due to the appearance of low-salinity environments, especially during glacial low-stands.

The ostracod fauna from the Hamada Formation in the Chikagawa area includes 15 now-extinct species of the above three families (Figure 8) from shallow-water sediments. However, this fauna lacks several now-extinct species of two genera in these three families, i.e., Laperousecythere sp. cf. L. ishizakii, Laperousecythere sp. A, Laperousecythere sp. D and Cornucoquimba sp. C (Figure 8). This occurrence mode of now-extinct species with extant species in the three ostracod families during the interval 1.5 to 1.2 Ma is similar to that observed in coastal deposits from the southwestern to northeastern Japan Sea (Figure 8) during the same period. These facts suggest that the ostracod fauna living under open sea conditions of the upper-shelf regions in the Chikagawa area was similar to those of other areas of the Japan Sea during this period, even though the Chikagawa area is located at the easternmost part of the Japan Sea near the Pacific, ca. 141°E.

Conclusions

  • (1) The ostracod fauna from the early Pleistocene Hamada Formation in the Chikagawa and Tanabu Lowland areas of the Shimokita Peninsula, northeastern Japan, consists of 184 species, based on the examination of a total of twelve samples.

  • (2) Three biofacies were recognized by Q-mode cluster analysis. The depositional environment of each biofacies can be defined as (a) upper-shelf area under the influence of the open sea in relatively high salinity (biofacies N), (b) inner— central-bay area with relatively low salinity (biofacies B) and (c) bay-mouth area with intermediate salinity level between those of (a) and (b) (biofacies L).

  • (3) The palaeo-environment changed during the depositional period in the Chikagawa area with a decrease in water depth, from the upper shelf through the bay mouth to the inner central bay. It is estimated that the palaeoceanographic setting of this area was a water mass similar to the present Japan Sea Central Water mass under surface water influenced by currents similar to the modern Tsugaru Warm and Oyashio Cold Currents.

  • (4) Based on planktic foraminifers, the probable geological age of the Hamada Formation in the Tanabu Lowland area is ca. 1.3–0.7 Ma. During a restricted period of 1.3–0.7 Ma the palaeo-environment was a bay-mouth area there.

  • (5) The occurrence of Buntonia hanaii and Yezocythere spp. in biofacies B of the Chikagawa area indicates that they commonly inhabited the inner—central-bay environment along the coast of northernmost Honshu around 1.2 Ma, instead of modern representative inner-bay taxa, e.g., Spinileberis quadriaculeata, that first appeared in northernmost Honshu after 1.0 Ma.

  • (6) The fossil ostracod fauna from the Chikagawa area of 1.5–1.2 Ma contains in the upper-shelf region 15 now-extinct species and 14 extant species of Hemicytheridae, Cytheruridae and Eucytheridae, but lacks several now-extinct species of Laperousecythere and Cornucoquimba. These results suggest that the ostracod fauna of the upper-shelf environment in this area was similar to those from southwestern to northeastern Japan Sea coasts during the same period, even though this area is located at the easternmost extremity of the Japan Sea coast (ca. 141°E) near the Pacific.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Y. Tanimura (National Museum of Nature and Science, Tokyo) and the late Y. Kuwano for kind assistance in various aspects of preparing the manuscript and in examination for sediment samples. Thanks are also due to A. Tsukagoshi (Shizuoka University) and M. Oda (Tohoku University) for giving valuable advice concerning the species identification of ostracods and planktic foraminifers. We thank T. M. Cronin (United States Geological Survey), K. Ishida (Shinshu University) and R. J. Smith (Lake Biwa Museum) for critically reviewing the manuscript and providing much helpful advice. This research was partly supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) from MEXT, No. 20740291 to H. Domitsu.

References

1.

K. Abe , 1983: Population structure of Keijellu bisanensis (Okubo) (Ostracoda, Crustacea)—an inquiry into how far the population structure will be preserved in the fossil record. Journal of the Faculty of Science, University of Tokyo Bulletin , vol. 20, p. 443–488. Google Scholar

2.

K. Amano , 2004: Biogeography and the Pleistocene extinction of neogastropods in the Japan Sea. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology , vol. 202, p. 245–252. Google Scholar

3.

S. Aoki and Y. Kuwano , 1959: Neogene molluscan fauna of Shimokita Peninsula, northern Honshu, Japan (preliminary report). Miscellaneous Reports of the Research Institute for Natural Resources , no. 50, p. 30–34. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

4.

J. Athersuch , D. J. Home and J. E. Whittaker , 1989: Marine and Brackish Water Ostracods (Superfamilies Cypridacea and Cytheracea) , 359 p. E. J. Brill, Leiden. Google Scholar

5.

I. Boomer , D. J. Home and I. J. Slipper , 2003: The use of ostracodes in paleoenvironmental studies or what can you do with an ostracode shell? In , L. E. Park and A. J. Smith eds., Bridging the gap: trends in the ostracode biological and geological sciences . The Paleontological Society Papers 9, p. 153–179. Google Scholar

6.

E. M. Brouwers , 1988: Palaeobathymetry on the continental shelf based on examples using ostracods from the Gulf of Alaska. In , P. D. De Deckker , J.-P. Colin and J.-P. Peypouquet eds., Ostracoda in the Earth Sciences , p. 55–76. Elsevier, Amsterdam. Google Scholar

7.

E. M. Brouwers , 1990: Systematic paleontology of Quaternary ostracode assemblages from the Gulf of Alaska, Part 1 : Families Cytherellidae, Bairdiidae, Cytheridae, Leptocytheridae, Limnocytheridae, Eucytheridae, Krithidae, Cushmanideidae. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper , vol 1510, p. 1–43. Google Scholar

8.

E. M. Brouwers , 1993: Systematic paleontology of Quaternary ostracode assemblages from the Gulf of Alaska, Part 2: Families Trachyleberididae, Hemicytheridae, Loxoconchidae, Paracytheridae. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper , vol. 1531, p. 1–47. Google Scholar

9.

K. Chinzei , 1991: Late Cenozoic zoogeography of the Sea of Japan area. Episodes , vol. 14, p. 231–235. Google Scholar

10.

T. M. Cronin and G. S. Dwyer , 2003: Deep-sea ostracodes and climate change. In , L. E. Park and A. J. Smith eds., Bridging the gap: trends in the ostracode biological and geological sciences. The Paleontological Society Papers 9, p. 247–264. Google Scholar

11.

T. M. Cronin and N. Ikeya 1987: The Omma Manganji ostracode fauna (Plio-Pleistocene) of Japan and the zoogeography of circumpolar species. Journal of Micropalaeontology , vol. 6, p. 65–88. Google Scholar

12.

T. M. Cronin , A. Kitamura , N. Ikeya , M. Watanabe and T. Kamiya , 1994: Late Pliocene climate change 3.4–2.3 Ma: paleoceanographic record from the Yabuta Formation, Sea of Japan. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology , vol. 108, p. 437–455. Google Scholar

13.

H. Domitsu and M. Oda , 2008: Pleistocene planktic foraminifer events in the northwest Pacific near Japan. The Open Paleontology Journal , vol. 1, p. 1–6. Google Scholar

14.

M. Haga and T. Yamaguchi , 1990: Stratigraphy and fossil diatoms of the Neogene to Quaternary formations in the eastern Shimokita Peninsula, Aomori Prefecture. Bulletin of National Science Museum, Tokyo, Series C , vol. 16, p. 55–78. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

15.

Ø Hammer ., D. A. T. Harper and P. D. Ryan , 2001: PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologica Electronica , vol. 4, 9 p. [available from website at  http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htmGoogle Scholar

16.

T. Hanai and N. Ikeya , 1991: Two new genera from the Omma-Manganji ostracode fauna (Plio—Pleistocene) of Japan—with a discussion of theoretical versus purely descriptive ostracode nomenclature. Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, New Series , no. 163, p. 861–878. Google Scholar

17.

T. Hanai and T. Yamaguchi , 1987: Plio-Pleistocene ostracod fauna of Shimokita, Aomori Prefecture (preliminary report). Memoirs of National Science Museum, Tokyo , no. 20, p. 45–51. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

18.

S. Hanzawa , 1954: Regional Geology of Japan: Tohoku Region , 344 p. Asakura-Shoten Co., Tokyo, (in JapaneseGoogle Scholar

19.

N. Ikeya and T. M. Cronin , 1993: Quantitative analysis of Ostracoda and water masses around Japan: Application to Pliocene and Pleistocene paleoceanography. Micropaleontology , vol. 39, p. 263–281. Google Scholar

20.

N. Ikeya and H. Itoh , 1991: Recent Ostracoda from the Sendai Bay region, Pacific coast of northeastern Japan. Report of Faculty of Science, Shizuoka University , vol. 25, p. 93–141. Google Scholar

21.

N. Ikeya and M. Shiozaki , 1993: Characteristic of the inner bay ostracodes around the Japanese Islands: The use of ostracodes to reconstruct paleoenvironments. Memoirs of the Geological Society of Japan , no. 39, p. 15–32. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

22.

N. Ikeya and C. Suzuki , 1992: Distributional patterns of modern ostracodes off Shimane, southwestern Japan Sea. Report of Faculty of Science, Shizuoka University , vol. 26, p. 91–137. Google Scholar

23.

N. Ikeya , B. C. Zhou and J. Sakamoto , 1992: Modem ostracode fauna from Otsuchi Bay, the Pacific coast of Northeastern Japan. In , K. Ishizaki and T. Saito eds., Centenary of Japanese Micropaleontology , p. 339–354. Terra Scientific Publishing Company, Tokyo. Google Scholar

24.

T. Irizuki 1993: Morphology and taxonomy of some Japanese hemicytherin Ostracoda—with particular reference to ontogenetic changes of marginal pores. Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, New Series , no. 170, p. 186–211. Google Scholar

25.

T. Irizuki , 1996: Ontogenetic change in valve characters in three new species of Baffinicythere (Ostracoda, Crustacea) from Northern Japan. Journal of Paleontology , vol. 70, p. 450–462. Google Scholar

26.

T. Irizuki and K. Ishida , 2007: Relationship between Pliocene ostracode assemblages and marine environments along the Japan Sea side regions in Japan. Fossils (Palaeontological Society of Japan) , no. 82, p. 13–20. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

27.

K. Ishizaki , 1971: Ostracodes from Aomori Bay, Aomori Prefecture, Northeast Honshu, Japan. Tohoku University, Science Report, 2nd Series (Geology) vol. 43, p. 59–97. Google Scholar

28.

K. Ishizaki , 1983: Ostracoda from the Pliocene Ananai Formation, Shikoku, Japan—Description. Transactions und Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan , no. 131, p. 135–158. Google Scholar

29.

K. Ishizaki and Y. Matoba , 1985: Early Pleistocene cold, shallow water Ostracoda. Guidebook of Excursions , Excursion 5: Akita International Symposium of Ostracoda, Shizuoka, p. 1–12. Google Scholar

30.

H. Iwatani and T. Irizuki , 2008: Geology and fossil ostracode assemblages from the Pliocene Miyazaki Group in the northern part of the Miyazaki Plain, Southwest Japan. Fossils (Palaeontological Society of Japan), no. 84, p. 61–73. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

31.

T. Kamataki , 1999: Molluscan shell assemblage under the influence of depositional rate: An example of the middle Pleistocene Yabu Formation, Shimosa Group, central Japan. Memoirs of the Geological Society of Japan , no. 54, p. 175–184. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

32.

T. Kamiya , 1988: Morphological and ethological adaptations of Ostracoda to microhabitats in Zostera beds. In , T. Hanai , N. Ikeya and K. Ishizaki eds., Evolutionary Biology of OstracodaIts Fundamentals and Applications , p. 303–318. Kodansha, Tokyo and Elsevier, Amsterdam. Google Scholar

33.

T. Kamiya , H. Ozawa and M. Obata , 2001: Quaternary and Recent marine Ostracoda in Hokuriku district, the Japan Sea coast. In , N. Ikeya ed., Field Excursion Guidebook; 14th International Symposium of Ostracoda, Shizuoka , p. 73–106. Organising Committee of 14th ISO, Shizuoka. Google Scholar

34.

K. Kanazawa , 1990: Early Pleistocene glacio-eustatic sea-level fluctuations as deduced from periodic changes in cold- and warm-water molluscan associations in the Shimokita Peninsula, northeast Japan. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology , vol. 79, p. 263–273. Google Scholar

35.

K. Kanazawa and T. Yamaguchi , 1988: Geology of the Plio-Pleistocene Hamada Formation in the Shimokita Peninsula, Aomori Prefecture. Bulletin of the Nationul Science Museum, Tokyo, Series C , vol. 14, p. 45– 57. (in Jupanese with English abstract)  Google Scholar

36.

M. Kato , K. Akada , T. Takayama , T. Goto , T. Sato , T. Kudo and K. Kameo , 1995: Calcareous microfossil biostratigraphy of the uppermost Cenozoic Formation distributed in the coast of the Japan Sea—“Sawane Formation”. Annuls of Science, College of Liberal Arts, Kanazawa University , vol. 32. p. 21–38. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

37.

K. Koya , 1995: Marine environmental changes since late Pliocene, recorded in the diatom fossil assemblage of the DSDP cores off Sanriku, Northeast Japan. The Journal of the Geological Society of Japan , vol. 101, p. 148–161. (in Jupanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

38.

A. Kuwahara , 1990: Chemical features of coastal area of Sanin region (Chapter 34-III). In , Coastal Oceanography Research Committee, Oceanographical Society of Japan ed., Coastal Oceanography of Japanese Islands/ Supplementary Volume , p. 768–771. Tokai University Press, Tokyo, (in JapaneseGoogle Scholar

39.

Y. Kuwano , 1956: Quaternary system in the environs of Tanabu-Machi, Aomori Prefecture, Japan. Miscellaneous Reports of the Reseurch Institute for Nuturul Resources , no. 40, p. 29–40. (in Japanese with English ubstractGoogle Scholar

40.

Y. Kuwano , 1957: Quaternary system of the northern part of Tanabu Lowland area, Aomori Prefecture, Japan. Miscellaneous Reports of the Research Institute for Natural Resources , nos. 43–44, p. 178–194. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

41.

I. Motoyama , N. Niitsuma , T. Maruyama , H. Hayashi , S. Kamikuri , M. Shiono , T. Kanamatsu , C. Morishita , K. Aoki , K. Hagino , H. Nishi and M. Oda , 2004: Middle Miocene to Pleistocene magnetobiostratigraphy of ODP Sites 1150 and 1151, northwest Pacific: sedimentation rate and updated regional geologic time scale. The Island Arc , vol. 13, p. 289–305. Google Scholar

42.

F. Nagamine , T. Mitsuya , K. Amano , N. Takabayashi , Y. Nara, T. Shiratori , M. Yamamoto , K. Hamada , H. Fukikoshi and H. Kindaichi , 1982: Report of the result for the research on the shallow sea survey lines (Mutsu Bay), Fiscal year report of the preliminary project on the fishery and marine condition. Report of Aomori Prefectural Fishery and Aquiculture Center, p. 1–24. (in JapaneseGoogle Scholar

43.

Y. Nakao , G. Tanaka and S. Yamada , 2001: Pleistocene and living marine Ostracoda in Shizuoka district, Japan. In , N. Ikeya ed., Field Excursion Guidebook; 14th International Symposium of Ostrucoda, Shizuoka , p. 127–147. Organising Committee of 14th ISO, Shizuoka. Google Scholar

44.

N. Nemoto , 1997: Palaeoenvironment around Tsugaru Strait in the early Quaternary based on the foraminifer fossils. Oshimanography , vol. 4, p. 22–27. (in JapaneseGoogle Scholar

45.

N. Nemoto and N. Yoshimoto , 2001: Foraminiferal fossils from the Pleistocene Hamada Formation in the Chikagawa area, eastern Shimokita Peninsula, Northeast Japan. Fossils (Palaeontological Society of Japan) , no. 69, p. 1–24. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

46.

T. Nohara , 1987: Cenozoic ostracodes of Okinawa-jima. Bulletin of College of Education, Ryukyu University , no. 30, p. 1–105. Google Scholar

47.

A. Nojo , S. Hasegawa , H. Okada , Y. Togo , A. Suzuki and T. Matsuda , 1999: Interregional lithostratigraphy and biostratigraphy of the Pleistocene Setana Formation, southwestern Hokkaido, Japan. The Journal of the Geological Society of Japan , vol. 105, p. 370–388. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

48.

R. Okubo , H. Oda , T. Takayama and A. Kitamura , 1995: Paleomagnetic polarity and calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy of the Pleistocene Sawane Formation on Sado-Island, Niigata Prefecture, central Japan. The Journal of the Geological Society of Japan , vol. 101, p. 443–450. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

49.

H. Ozawa , 1996: Ostracode fossils from the late Pliocene to early Pleistocene Omma Formation in the Hokuriku district, central Japan. Science Report of Kanazawa University , vol. 41, p. 77–115. Google Scholar

50.

H. Ozawa , 2003: Japan Sea ostracod assemblages in surface sediments: their distribution and relationships to water mass properties. Paleontological Research , vol. 7, p. 257–274. Google Scholar

51.

H. Ozawa , 2004: Okhotsk Sea ostracods in surface sediments: depth distribution of cryophilic species relative to oceanic environment. Marine Micropaleontology , vol. 53, p. 245–260. Google Scholar

52.

H. Ozawa , 2006: An overview of the geographical distribution and ecological significance of species in the three families of cryophilic ostracods (Crustacea: Ostracoda) in and around the Japan Sea—with special reference to distribution of species in relation to water temperature-salinity ranges. Taxa, Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology , vol. 20, p. 26–40. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

53.

H. Ozawa , 2007: Faunal changes of cryophilic ostracods (Crustacea) in the Japan Sea, in relation to oceanographic environment: an overview. Fossils (Palaeontological Society of Japan) , no. 82, p. 22–30. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

54.

H. Ozawa , K. Ikehara and H. Katayama , 1999: Recent ostracod fauna in the northeastern part of the Japan Sea, off northwestern Hokkaido. In , K. Ikehara and Y. Okamura eds, Preliminary report on researches in the 1998 Fiscal year, GSJ Interim Report, no. MG/99/1 , p. 103–117. Geological Survey of Japan, Tsukuba. (in JapaneseGoogle Scholar

55.

H. Ozawa and T. Ishii , 2008: Taxonomy and sexual dimorphism of a new species of Loxoconchu (Podocopida: Ostracoda) from the Pleistocene of the Japan Sea. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society , vol. 153, p. 239–251. Google Scholar

56.

H. Ozawa and T. Kamiya , 2001: Palaeoceanographic records related to glacio-eustatic fluctuations in the Pleistocene Japan Sea coast based on ostracods from the Omma Formation. Palaeogeogruphy, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology , vol. 170, p. 27–48. Google Scholar

57.

H. Ozawa and T. Kamiya , 2005a: The effects of glacio-eustatic sea-level change on Pleistocene cold-water ostracod assemblages from the Japan Sea. Murine Micropaleontology , vol. 54, p. 167–189. Google Scholar

58.

H. Ozawa and T. Kamiya , 2005b: Ecological analysis of benthic ostracods in the northern Japan Sea, based on water properties of modern habitats and late Cenozoic fossil records. Marine Micropaleontology , vol. 55, p. 255–276. Google Scholar

59.

H. Ozawa and T. Kamiya , 2008: Taxonomy and palaeobiogeographical significance for four new species of Semicytherura (Ostracoda, Crustacea) from the Early Pleistocene Omma Formation at the Japan Sea coast. Journal of Micropalaeontology , vol. 27, p. 135–146. Google Scholar

60.

H. Ozawa and T. Kamiya , 2009: A new species of Aurila (Crustacea: Ostracoda: Cytheroidea: Hemicytheridae) from the Pleistocene Omma Formation on the coast of the Sea of Japan. Species Diversity , vol. 14, p. 27–39. Google Scholar

61.

H. Ozawa , T. Kamiya , H. Itoh and S. Tsukawaki , 2004a: Water temperature, salinity ranges and ecological significance of the three families of Recent cold-water ostracods in and around the Japan Sea. Paleontologicul Research , vol. 8, p. 11–28. Google Scholar

62.

H. Ozawa , T. Kamiya , T. Kato and S. Tsukawaki , 2004b: A preliminary report on the Recent ostracodes in sediment samples from the R.V. Tanseimara Cruise KT01-14 in the southwestern Okhotsk Sea and the northeastern Japan Sea off Hokkaido. Bulletin of the Japan Seu Research Institute , no. 35, p. 33–46. Google Scholar

63.

H. Ozawa , H. Nagamori and T. Tanabe , 2008: Pliocene ostracods (Crustacea) from the Togakushi area, central Japan; palaeobiogeography of trans-Arctic taxa and Japan Sea endemic species. Journal of Micropalaeontology , vol. 27, p. 161–175. Google Scholar

64.

K. H. Paik and E. H. Lee , 1988: Plio-Pleistocene ostracods from the Sogwipo Formation, Cheju Island, Korea. In , T. Hanai , N. Ikeya and K. Ishizaki eds., Evolutionary Biology of Ostrucoda-Its Fundamentals and Applicutions , p. 541–556. Kodansha, Tokyo and Elsevier, Amsterdam. Google Scholar

65.

E. Robinson , 1978: The Pleistocene. In , R. Bate and E. Robinson eds., A stratigraphic index of British Ostracodu. Geological Journal Special Issue 8, p. 451–472. Google Scholar

66.

T. Sato , K. Kameo and I. Mita , 1999: Validity of the latest Cenozoic calcareous nannofossil datums and its implication to the tephrachronology. Earth Science (Chikyu-Kuguku) , vol. 53, p. 265–274. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

67.

T. Sato and T. Kamiya , 2007: Taxonomy and geographical distribution of recent Xestoleberis species (Cytheroidea, Ostracoda, Crustacea) from Japan. Paleontological Research , vol. 11, p. 183–227. Google Scholar

68.

M. Shirai , R. Tada and K. Fujioka , 1997: Identification and chronostratigraphy of Middle to Upper Quaternary marker tephras occurring in the Anden coast based on comparison with ODP cores in the Japan Sea. Quaternary Research (Daiyonki-Kenkyu) , vol. 36, p. 183–196. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

69.

H. Sugawara , T. Yamaguchi and T. Kawabe , 1997: Geological age of the Hamada Formation in the eastern Shimokita Peninsula, Aomori Prefecture. Fossils (Palaeontolological Society of Japan) , no. 62, p. 15–23. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

70.

R. Tabuki , 1986: Plio-Pleistocene Ostracoda from the Tsugaru Basin, North Honshu, Japan. Bulletin of College of Education, University of Ryukyus , vol. 29, p. 27–160. Google Scholar

71.

H. Takata 2000: Paleoenvironmental changes during the deposition of the Omma Formation (late Pliocene to early Pleistocene) in Oyabe area, Toyama Prefecture based on the analysis of benthic and planktonic foraminiferal assemblages. Fossils (Palaeontological Society of Japana) , no. 67, p. 1–18. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

72.

T. Takayama , M. Kato , T. Kudo and K. Kameo , 1988: Calcareous microfossil biostratigraphy of the uppermost Cenozoic Formations distributed in the coast of the Japan Sea—part 2: Hokuriku Sedimentary Basin. Journal of Japanese Association of Petroleum Technology , vol. 53, p. 9–27. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

73.

M. Terazaki and N. Shikama , 1979: Monthly variation of water temperature and salinity in Otsuchi Bay. Report of Otsuchi Marine Research Center , no. 5, p. 9–14. (in JapaneseGoogle Scholar

74.

A. Tsukagoshi , 1996: Recommendation of paleontology—phylogeny demonstrated fossils. In , K. Iwatsuki and S. Mawatari eds., Species Diversity, Biodiversity Series 1, p. 173–187. Shokabo, Tokyo, (in Japanese, title translatedGoogle Scholar

75.

A. Tsukagoshi and N. Ikeya , 1987: The ostracod genus Cythere O. F. Müller, 1785 and its species. Transactions und Proceedings of the Palaeontologicul Society of Japan, New Series , no. 148, p. 197–222. Google Scholar

76.

S. Tsukawaki , H. Ozawa , H. Domitsu , K. Hirano , T. Maeda , Y. Tomii , S. Saito , X. Xu , T. Kamiya , M. Kato and M. Oda , 2001: Preliminary results from the R.V. Tansei-maru Cruise KT99-14 in the central and northeastern marginal parts of the Japan Sea—Sediments, benthic and planktonic foraminifers and ostracodes (Part I: Surface sediments). Bulletin of the Japan Sea Research Institute , no. 32, p. 1–28. Google Scholar

77.

K. Yamada , T. Irizuki and Y. Tanaka , 2002: Cyclic sea-level changes based on fossil ostracode faunas from the upper Pliocene Sasaoka Formation, Akita Prefecture, central Japan. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology , vol. 185, p. 115–132. Google Scholar

78.

T. Yamaguchi , 1970: The Neogene of the northeastern part of the Shimokita Peninsula, northeast Honshu, Japan. The Journal of the Geological Society of Japan , vol. 76, p. 185–197. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

79.

Q. Zhao and P. Wang , 1988: Distribution of modern Ostracoda in the shelf seas off China. In , T. Hanai , N. Ikeya and K. Ishizaki eds., Evolutionary Biology of Ostrucoda—Its Fundamentals and Applications , p. 805–821. Kodansha, Tokyo and Elsevier, Amsterdam. Google Scholar
© by the Palaeontological Society of Japan
Hirokazu Ozawa and Hanako Domitsu "Early Pleistocene Ostracods from the Hamada Formation in the Shimokita Peninsula, Northeastern Japan: the Palaeobiogeographic Significance of their Occurrence for the Shallow-Water Fauna," Paleontological Research 14(1), 1-18, (1 April 2010). https://doi.org/10.2517/1342-8144-14.1.001
Received: 17 February 2009; Accepted: 1 October 2009; Published: 1 April 2010
KEYWORDS
Early Pleistocene
extinct species
Hamada Formation
Japan Sea
Ostracods
palaeo-biogeography
Back to Top