Translator Disclaimer
31 December 2003 First notice of the family Coleiidae Van Straelen (Crustacea: Decapoda: Eryonoidea) from the upper Triassic of Japan
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Coleia uzume sp. nov., a lobster of the polychelidan family Coleiidae, is described from the upper Triassic (Carnian) Nakatsuka Formation of the Mine Group in Yamaguchi Prefecture, southwest Japan. The discovery of C. uzume greatly extends the geologic range for the genus back to the late Triassic. This species represents the first and oldest records of a Triassic decapod in the western Panthalassic realm.

Introduction

The Coleiidae Van Straelen, 1924, an extinct family within the superfamily Eryonoidea De Haan, 1841, is a small group including five genera, Coleia Broderip, 1835, Hellerocaris Van Straelen, 1924, Proeryon Beurlen, 1928, Pseudocoleia Garassino and Teruzzi, 1993, and Tropifer Gould, 1857 (Glaessner, 1969; Duffin, 1978; Garassino and Teruzzi, 1993; Schweigert, 2000). In his review of the genus Coleia Broderip, 1835, Pinna (1968) recognized 13 species from the lower Jurassic of Europe. Subsequently, Teruzzi (1990) described two additional new species from the lower Jurassic of Italy. Coleia occurs outside Europe in the lower Jurassic of Siberia (Tschernyshev, 1930), the lower Jurassic of India (Feistmantel, 1877), and the upper Jurassic of Madagascar (Secretan, 1964). Schweigert and Dietl (1999) removed Eryon longipes Fraas, 1855, from the upper Jurassic of Germany, from Palaeopolycheles Von Knebel, 1907 (Polychelidae Wood-Mason, 1874) to Coleia based upon examination of well-preserved specimens. Garassino and Teruzzi (2001) assigned Proeryon banzensis Kuhn, 1952, from the lower Jurassic of Europe to Coleia. Thus, most members of Coleia are known from the lower-upper Jurassic in the western Tethys realm and only Coleia siberica Tschernyshev, 1930, occurs from the lower Jurassic in the northeast Panthalassic realm.

The purpose of this paper is to describe a new species of Coleia from the Nakatsuka Formation of the Mine Group (upper Triassic), deposited on the Akiyoshi Terrane, south-west Japan. The specimens were collected from shale of the Nakatsuka Formation exposed at Tsubuta (Loc. MN-1; 34°1′30″N, 131°7′20″E), Sanyo-cho, Yamaguchi Prefecture (Figure 1). Coleia occurred in association with fragments of a penaeoid, pelecypods, Halobia spp., ammonites, and plants. Tokuyama (1962) indicated based upon pelecypods that the geologic age of the Nakatsuka Formation was Carnian (late Triassic). The presence of Trachyceras cfr. T. desatoyense Johnston, 1941, from the formation further shows that its geologic age is early Carnian (Ishibashi et al., 1990).

Figure 1

Locality map.

i1342-8144-7-4-357-f01.gif

The described specimens are housed in the Mine City Museum of History and Folklore, Omine, Mine, Yamaguchi 759-2292, Japan.

Systematics

Infraorder Polychelida Wood-Mason, 1874

Superfamily Eryonoidea De Haan, 1841

Remarks.—The Eryonoidea has traditionally been included within the infraorder Palinura Latreille, 1802 (i.e., Glaessner, 1969; Holthuis, 1991; Martin and Davis, 2001). However, Scholtz and Richter (1995) and Schram (2001) showed based upon cladistic analysis that the Palinura was a paraphyletic taxon and the Polychelida was the most basal clade within the reptantian decapods. According to Scholtz and Richter (1995), the Eryonoidea is here placed within the Polychelida.

Family Coleiidae Van Straelen, 1924

Emended diagnosis.—Carapace ovate or rectangular, flattened dorsoventrally, longer than wide; rostrum indented medially; orbital sinus deep; cervical and postcervical incisions usually well developed; lateral margin convex; posterior margin concave; median postrostral carina and postorbital carinae distinct; cervical groove usually deep; postcervical groove shallow; median postcervical carina and branchial carinae distinct. Abdominal somites broad, depressed dorsoventrally; all terga with median tergal carina; pleura of somites 2–6 developed; telson lanceolate or triangular; uropodal endopod truncate or ovate; exopod ovate with diarensis. Eye present. Pereiopods 1–4 chelate.

Genus Coleia Broderip, 1835

Emended diagnosis.—Carapace ovate, flattened dorsoventrally, much longer than wide; rostrum indented medially; orbital sinus deeply concave or V-shaped; cervical and postcervical incisions deep; lateral margin convex; posterior margin concave; median postrostral carina and postorbital carinae present; cervical groove deep and postcervical groove shallow; median postcervical carina and branchial carinae present. Abdominal somites broad, depressed dorsoventrally; tergum of somite 1 short, fused pleura; all terga with median tergal carina; pleura of somites 2–6 well-developed; telson lanceolate or triangular; uropodal endopod and exopod ovate; exopod with diarensis. Antennal scaphocerite large, ovate. Eye present. Pereio-pods 1–4 chelate; pereiopod 1 usually slender, elongate.

Type species.—Coleia antiqua Broderip, 1835 by monotypy.

Other species.—Coleia cfr. antiqua (in Pinna, 1968); Coleia banzensis (Kuhn, 1952); Coleia cfr. C. banzensis (in Garassino and Teruzzi, 2001); Coleia barrovensis (McCoy, 1849); Coleia cfr. C. barrovensis (in Feistmantel, 1877); C. bredonensis Woods, 1925; C. brodiei (Woodward, 1866); C. crassichelis (Woodward, 1866); C. edwardsi (Moriére, 1864); C. escheri (Oppel, 1862); C. incerta Secretan, 1964; C. longipes (Fraas, 1855); C. mediterranea Pinna, 1968; C. morierei (Renault, 1889); C. pinnai Teruzzi, 1990; C. popeyei Teruzzi, 1990; C. siberica Tschernyshev, 1930; C. sinuata Beurlen, 1928; C. tenuichelis Woods, 1925; C. uzume sp. nov.; C. vialli Pinna, 1968; C. wilmcotensis (Woodward, 1866).

Geologic range.—Late Triassic to late Jurassic.

Coleia uzume sp. nov.

Figures 2.12.5, 3

Figure 2

Coleia uzume sp. nov. 1. MMHF-00039 (holotype), external mould. 2. MMHF-00040 (paratype), external mould. 3. MMHF-00043 (paratype), internal mould. 4. MMHF-00042 (paratype), internal mould. 5. MMHF-00041 (paratype), external mould. Scale bars = 1 cm. Abbreviations: Al, abdominal somite 1; A2, abdominal somite 2; A3, abdominal somite 3; A4, abdominal somite 4; A5, abdominal somite 5; A6, abdominal somite 6; be, branchial carina; C, carpus of pereiopod 1; ci, cervical incision; eg, cervical groove; D, dactylus of pereiopod 1; d, diarensis; eao, external angle of orbital sinus; ENP, uropodal endopod; EXP, uropodal exopod; ibc, inner branchial carina; M, merus of pereiopod 1; mpcc, median postcervical carina; mprc, median postrostral carina; mtc, median tergal carina; P, propodus of pereiopod 1; pc, postorbital carina; pi, postcervical incision; rt, rostral teeth; T, telson.

i1342-8144-7-4-357-f02.jpg

Figure 3

Reconstruction of Coleia uzume sp. nov.

i1342-8144-7-4-357-f03.gif

Diagnosis.—Moderate to small-sized Coleia. Carapace ovate, much longer than wide, widest at midlength, finely granulated dorsally. Rostrum with two triangular teeth. Orbital sinus V-shaped. Cervical and postcervical incisions deep. Median postrostral carina and postorbital carinae smooth, raised. Cervical groove deep, arcuate. Postcervical groove shallow. Median postcervical carina and branchial carinae smooth, raised. Inner branchial carina smooth, ridged, strongly convergent anteriorly. Terga of abdominal somites 1–6 finely granulated dorsally with smooth, ridged median tergal carina. Telson much longer than wide, lanceolate, tapering posteriorly, with median carina and submedian carinae. Pereiopod 1 chelate; dactylus and fixed finger slender, elongate, each about as long as palm; carpus short, about 1/3 propodus length; merus about equal to propodus length.

Etymology.—The specific name is formed from “uzume”, the name of a god of dancing in the Japanese language.

Description.—Body moderate to small for genus. Carapace ovate, flattened dorsoventrally, much longer than wide, width about 3/4 its length, widest at midlength. Rostrum consisting of two triangular teeth, separated by wide, sulcate, V-shaped emargination. Orbital sinus deep, V-shaped. External angle of orbital sinus triangular, much shorter than rostral teeth. Anterolateral margin gently convex. Cervical and postcervical incisions deep, well developed. Lateral margin gently convex with small spines posterolaterally. Posterior margin concave. Dorsal surface covered with fine granules. Median postrostral carina and postorbital carinae well developed without tubercles and spines; postorbital carinae gently converging anteriorly. Cervical groove deep, arcuate, well defined. Postcervical groove shallow. Median postcervical carina swollen, well developed, without tubercles and spines. Branchial carinae swollen, slightly converging anteriorly, without tubercles and spines. Inner branchial carina smooth, ridged, strongly convergent anteriorly, diverged from posterior end of branchial carina, but not joining cervical groove.

Abdomen about as long as carapace. Abdominal somites broad, depressed dorsoventrally, poorly preserved. Terga of somites 1–6 finely granulate dorsally, with marginal furrow and smooth, ridged median tergal carina. Tergum of somite 1 short, fused pleura; ventrolateral margin slightly convex with sharp posteroventral corners. Pleura of somites 2–4 not preserved; pleura of somites 5 and 6 poorly preserved; pleura of somite 6 bounding tergum by weak, transverse ridge, with rounded ventrolateral margin. Telson much longer than wide, lanceolate, tapering posteriorly, with median carina and submedian carinae dorsally. Uropodal endopod and exopod poorly preserved; exopod with diarensis.

Pereiopod 1 chelate, slender. Dactylus slender, elongate, about as long as palm, with ventrally hooked tip. Fixed finger also slender, elongate, equal to dactylus length, with upturned tip. Carpus short, about 1/3 propodus length. Merus about as long as propodus.

Pereiopods 2–5 unknown.

Material examined.—MMHF-00039 (holotype), MMHF-00040-00043 (paratype).

Discussion.—Coleia uzume sp. nov. possesses characters of the carapace and pereiopods 1 most like those of C. tenuichelis Woods, 1925, from the lower Sinemurian of Lyme Regis, England. However, the presence of inner branchial carinae on the dorsal carapace readily distinguishes the present species from C. tenuichelis. Coleia uzume resembles Coleia antiqua Broderip, 1835 from the lower Sinemurian of Lyme Regis (Broderip, 1835; Woods, 1925), but differs in having inner branchial carinae on the carapace and shorter propodi of pereiopods 1. In Coleia antiqua, the dactyli and fixed fingers are much shorter than the palm, while in C. uzume they are about half the propodus length.

In his review of Mesozoic decapods from Japan, Karasawa (2001) listed 22 species in 17 genera from lower Jurassic (Toarcian)-upper Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) deposits. Among these, Uncina pacifica Schweigert et al., 2003 (Uncinidae Beurlen, 1928), described from the Toarcian Toyora Group in Yamaguchi Prefecture by Karasawa (2002) and Schweigert et al. (2003), has been the previously known oldest record in Japan. Coleia uzume is the first and oldest recorded occurrence of a Triassic decapod in Japan.

Two coleiid genera have been previously known from upper Triassic deposits: Pseudocoleia Garassino and Teruzzi, 1993, from the Norian-Rhaetian of Italy (Garassino and Teruzzi, 1993; Garassino et al., 1996) and Tropifer Gould, 1857, from the Rhaetian of England (Duffin, 1978). The discovery of Coleia uzume from the Carnian of Japan represents the oldest record for not only the genus but also the family.

The Eryonoidea is represented by four families, Coleiidae, Eryonidae De Haan, 1841 (late Triassic-early Cretaceous), Polychelidae Wood-Mason, 1874 (middle Jurassic-Recent), and Tetrachelidae Beurlen, 1930 (late Triassic). Most genera excluding polychelids have been known from the western Tethys realm. Fossil members of the Polychelidae are recorded from the middle-upper Jurassic of Europe (Glaessner, 1969), the upper Jurassic of Antarctica (Aguirre-Urreta et al., 1990), and the lower Oligocene of western North America (Schweitzer and Feldmann, 2001). The recent polychelids are cosmopolitan in distribution (Galil, 2000). Among eryonoid genera Rosenfeldia Garassino et al., 1996, Pseudocoleia, Tetrachela Reuss, 1858, and Tropifer are known from upper Triassic deposits. The recognition of Coleia from Japan greatly extends the known geographic range for the Triassic Eryonoidea to the west side of the Panthalassic Ocean.

Acknowledgments

We thank J. S. H. Collins (London), A. Garassino (Museo Civico di Storia Naturale, Milan), and G. Schweigert (Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde, Stuttgart) for providing literature. We are deeply indebted to C. E. Schweitzer (Kent State University, Ohio) for reading our manuscript and providing useful comments. Special thanks are due to H. Kato (Natural History Museum and Institute, Chiba) for his review of the manuscript.

References

  1. M. B. Aguirre-Urreta, L. A. Buatois, G. Ch B. Chernoglasov, and F. A. Medina . 1990. First Polychelidae (Crustacea, Palinura) from the Jurassic of Antarctica. Antarctic Science 2:157–162. Google Scholar

  2. W. J. Broderip 1835. Description of some fossil Crustacea and Radiata. Proceedings of the Geological Society of London2:201–202. Google Scholar

  3. K. Beurlen 1928. Die Decapoden des Schwäbischen Jura mit Ausnahme der aus den oberjurassischen Plattenkalken stammenden. Palaeontographica Bd. 70. 115–278. Google Scholar

  4. K. Beurlen 1930. Vergleichende Stammesgeschichte. Grundlagen, Methoden, Probleme unter besonderer Beriicksichtigung der hoheren Krebse. Fortschritte in der Geologie und Paläion-tologie 8:317–586. Google Scholar

  5. W. De Haan 1833–1850. Crustacea. In P. F. von Siebold , editor. Fauna Japonica, sive, descriptio animalium, quae in Itinere per Japoniam, Jussu et auspiciis superiorum, qui summum in India Batava Imperium tenent, suscepto, annis 1823-1830 collegit, notis, observationibus et adumbrationibus illustravit i-xvii+i-xxxi+ix-xvi+1-243pls. A-J+L-Q+l-55. Lugduni-Batavorum. Google Scholar

  6. C. J. Duffin 1978. Tropifer laevis Gould (Coleiidae: Crustacea) and a new crustacean from the Rhaetian Bone Bed of Aust Cliff, Avon. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 64:177–185. Google Scholar

  7. O. Feistmantel 1877. Note on “Eryon comp. barrovensis” McCoy from the Sripermatur Group.near Madras. Records of the Geological Survey of India 10:193–196. Google Scholar

  8. O. Fraas 1855. Beiträge zum obersten weissen Jura in Schwaben. Jahreshefte des Vereins für vaterländische Naturkunde in Wiirttemberg 11:76–106. Google Scholar

  9. A. Garassino and G. Teruzzi . 1993. A new decapod crustacean assemblage from the Upper Triassic of Lombardy (N. Italy). Paleontologia Lombarda, n.s 1:27. Google Scholar

  10. A. Garassino and G. Teruzzi . 2001. I crostacei decapodi del Toarciano (Giurassico inferiore) di Sogno (Bergamo, N Italia). Atti delta Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano 141:187–197. Google Scholar

  11. A. Garassino, G. Teruzzi, and F. M. Dalla Vecchia . 1996. The macruran decapod crustaceans of the Dolomia di Forni (Norian, Upper Triassic) of Carnia (Udine, NE Italy). Atti della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano 136:15–60. Google Scholar

  12. B. S. Galil 2000. Crustacea Decapoda: Review of the genera and species of the family Polychelidae Wood-Mason, 1874. In A. Crosnier , editor. (ed.). Résultats des Campagnes MUSORSTOM, vol. 21. Mémoires du Museum national d'Histoire naturelle, tome 184. 285–387.Paris. Google Scholar

  13. M. F. Glaessner 1969. Decapoda. in R. C. Moore , editor. (ed.). Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part R, Arthropoda 4 R399-R533, R626-R628Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press. Google Scholar

  14. C. Gould 1857. On a new fossil crustacean (Tropifer laevis C. Gould) from the Lias bone bed. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 13:360–363. Google Scholar

  15. L. B. Holthuis 1991. FAO species catalogue. Vol. 13. Marine lobsters of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of species of interest to fisheries known to date. FAO Fisheries Synopsis /125:292. Google Scholar

  16. T. Ishibashi, K. Hashimoto, M. Nohara, and K. Yoshida . 1990. Triassic ammonites newly discovered in the western district of Yamaguchi Prefecture, Japan. The Journal of the Geological Society of Japan 96:771–774. in Japanese. Google Scholar

  17. F. N. Johnston 1941. Triassic at New Pass, Nevada (new Lower Karnic ammonoids). Journal of Paleontology 15:447–491. Google Scholar

  18. H. Karasawa 2001. Mesozoic decapod crustacean fauna of Japan. Kaiyo Monthly, Supplement /26:197–200. in Japanese and title translated. Google Scholar

  19. H. Karasawa 2002. Fossil uncinidean and anomalan Decapoda (Crustacea) in the Kitakyushu Museum and Institute of Natural History. Bulletin of the Kitakyushu Museum of Natural History /21:13–16. Google Scholar

  20. O. Kuhn 1952. Neue Crustacea Decapoda und Insekta aus dem Untersten Lias von Nordfranken. Palaeontographica, Abt. A Bd. 101. 153–166. Google Scholar

  21. P. A. Latreille 1802–1803. Histoire naturelle, générate et parti-culière, des crustacés et des insectes. 3:467. F. Dufart. Paris. Google Scholar

  22. J. W. Martin and G. B. Davis . 2001. An updated classification of the recent Crustacea. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Science Series /39:1–124. Google Scholar

  23. F. McCoy 1849. On the classification of some British fossil Crustacea with notices of new forms in the University Collection at Cambridge. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, ser. 2 4.161–179, 330–335 Google Scholar

  24. J. Moriére 1864. Note sur les Crustacés du terrain jurassique du Calvados. Bulletin de la Societé Linnéenne de Normandie 8:89–96. Google Scholar

  25. A. Oppel 1862. Über jurassische Crustaceen. Paläontologische Mittheilungen aus dent Museum des Koeniglichen Bayerischen Staates Bd. 1. 1–120. Google Scholar

  26. G. Pinna 1968. Gli Erionidei della nuova fauna sinemuriana a crostacei decapodi di Osteno in Lombardia. Atti della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano 107:93–134. Google Scholar

  27. Ch Renault 1889. Note sur une Eryonidée nouvelle trouvée à St. Honorine-la-Guillaume (Orne) dans le grès liasique. Bulletin de la Societé Linnéenne de Normandie, ser. 4 2:13–19. Google Scholar

  28. A. Reuss 1858. Über fossile Krebse aus den Raibler Schichten. Beiträge zur Päldontographie Oesterreichs 1:1–6. Google Scholar

  29. G. Scholtz and S. Richter . 1995. Phylogenetic systematics of the reptantian Decapoda (Crustacea, Malacostraca). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 113:289–328. Google Scholar

  30. F. R. Schram 2001. Phylogeny of decapods: moving towards a consensus. Hydrobiologia 449:1–20. Google Scholar

  31. G. Schweigert 2000. News about Jurassic eryonid decapods (Coleiidae, Eryonidae) from southern Germany. In. 1st Workshop on Mesozoic and Tertiary Decapod Crustaceans, Montecchio Maggiore-Vicenza, Italy 6-8 October 2000. Extended abstracts — Studi e Richerche 63–65.Associazione Amici del Museo-Museo Civico “G. Zannato”. Google Scholar

  32. G. Schweigert and G. Dietl . 1999. Neubeschreibung von “Eryon longipes O. Fraas” (Crustacea, Decapoda, Eryonidea) aus dem Nusplinger Plattenkalk (Ober-Kimmeridgium, Schwäbische Alb). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, Ser. B (Geologie und Paläontologie) /274:1–19. Google Scholar

  33. G. Schweigert, A. Garassino, R. L. Hall, and H. Karasawa . 2003. The lobster genus Uncina Quenstedt, 1851 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Astacidea: Uncinidae) from the Lower Jurassic. Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, Ser. B (Geologie und Paläontologie) /332:1–43. Google Scholar

  34. C. E. Schweitzer and R. M. Feldmann . 2001. New Cretaceous and Tertiary decapod crustaceans from western North America. Bulletin of the Mizunami Fossil Museum /28:173–210. Google Scholar

  35. S. Secretan 1964. Les crustacés décapodes du Jurassique supérieur et du Crétacé de Madagascar. Mémoires du Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris, n. sér. C (Sciences de la Terre) tome 14. 1–226. Google Scholar

  36. G. Teruzzi 1990. The genus Coleia Broderip, 1835 (Crustacea, Decapoda) in the Sinemurian of Osteno in Lombardy. Atti della Società ltaliana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano 131:84–104. Google Scholar

  37. A. Tokuyama 1962. Triassic and some other organic sediments of the Akiyoshi cycle in Japan, with special reference to their evo lution. Journal of the Faculty of Science, University of Tokyo, ser. II 13:379–469. Google Scholar

  38. B. Tschernyshev 1930. Novie Eryonidae s r. Viliuia. Izvestiya Vsesojuznogo Geologo-razvedochnogo Upravleniya 49:375–384. in Russian. Google Scholar

  39. V. Van Straelen 1924. Contribution à l'étude des crustacés décapodes de la période Jurassique. Memoires de l' Académie Royale de Belgique, Classe des Sciences, Collection in-4, Deuxième sér tome 7. 462. Google Scholar

  40. W. Von Knebel 1907. Die Eryoniden des oberen Weissen Jura. Archiv für Biontologie 2:195–233. Google Scholar

  41. J. Wood-Mason 1874. On blind crustaceans. Proceedings of the Asiatic Society of Bengal1874:180–181. Google Scholar

  42. H. Woods 1925–1931. A monograph of the fossil macrurous Crustacea of England. Palaeontographical Society, Monograph. 122. London. Google Scholar

  43. H. Woodward 1866. Notes on the species of the genus Eryon Desmarest from the Lias and Oolite of England and Bavaria. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 22:494–502. Google Scholar

HIROAKI KARASAWA, FUMIO TAKAHASHI, EIJI DOI, and HIDEO ISHIDA "First notice of the family Coleiidae Van Straelen (Crustacea: Decapoda: Eryonoidea) from the upper Triassic of Japan," Paleontological Research 7(4), (31 December 2003). https://doi.org/10.2517/prpsj.7.357
Received: 14 May 2003; Accepted: 1 August 2003; Published: 31 December 2003
JOURNAL ARTICLE
6 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top