Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 January 2007 The Status of Lemur Species at Antserananomby: An Update
Elizabeth A. Kelley, Robert W. Sussman, Kathleen M. Muldoon
Author Affiliations +

Antserananomby Forest was once a refuge of the rare deciduous flora of western Madagascar. Through primate studies that were conducted in the late 1960s and early 1970s, it was discovered that the primate density and diversity in this forest was greater than any other known in western Madagascar. Although research at Antserananomby ceased in the 1980s, satellite images from 2000 indicated that the forests were still intact. In August 2004, we returned to Antserananomby to determine whether this site could feasibly become a location for long-term primate research and to assess whether efforts should be initiated to establish Antserananomby Forest as a national reserve. In addition to general assessments, we conducted diurnal primate surveys using the line transect sampling method. We found that the 8.6 ha of Antserananomby Forest have since been cleared. Due to recent demographic and attitudinal changes in the local human population, the surrounding forests are regularly burned, and at least some of the lemur species are hunted with lemur traps, dogs, and sling shots. In addition, the population densities of especially Eulemur fulvus rufus and Lemur catta, but also of Propithecus verreauxi verreauxi, Phaner furcifer, and Lepilemur ruficaudatus, have declined appreciably. We conclude that although all of the primate fauna appear to be present, the current rate of deforestation at Antserananomby is unsustainable. If no action is taken to conserve what is left and restore what has been lost, then the forests in this region and their inhabitants are likely to soon disappear.


The region of Antserananomby is 12 km north of the Mangoky River, 21.7°S, 44.1°E, in the Toliara province of Madagascar (Fig. 1). In the 1970s, one of the forests, Antserananomby, was the site of a comparative primate ecology study and several primate surveys (Fetter et al. 1971; Sussman 1972; Richard 1978). Antserananomby was an alluvial forest of dense, mainly deciduous vegetation with trees reaching a height of 25 to 30 m. The dominant tree was Tamarindus indica, but species such as Acacia rovumae, Ficus soroceoides, Terminalia mantaly, Quivisianthe papinae, and Vitex beraviensis were also relatively common (Sussman 1972).

Within the last thirty years, there has been very little contact between the villager s of Antserananomby and researchers. In addition to Sussman, the villagers remember Otto Appert, a Swiss missionary and naturalist who lived close to the area for many years. Appert produced multiple publications on bird species in the region (for example, Appert 1968, 1970a, 1970b, 1980), and one broad diurnal primate survey (Appert 1966). One of the main reasons so few other researchers have conducted studies in this area is that the entire region north of the Mangoky River becomes an island throughout the austral summer, when the Mangoky and Morondava rivers swell from the rains. In addition, the ability to reach Antserananomby has become increasingly problematic with the region's continuous decline in infrastructure (Sussman et al. 2003).

Despite its inaccessibility, Antserananomby has long been perceived as a site of great ecological importance. Specific to the primate fauna, Antserananomby has been the only forest found to contain all of the lemur species known to exist in this region of western Madagascar [Sussman, unpubl. data]. Moreover, the densities of these populations have been reported as exceptionally high. When A. Schilling and Sussman conducted surveys on Lepilemur ruficaudatus (red-tailed sportive lemurs) and Phaner furcifer (western fork-marked lemur) in the late 1960s, they found densities of 260 individuals/km2 and at least 550 individuals/km2 respectively (Fetter et al. 1971). Similarly, Sussman (1972, 1974) observed that Lemur catta lived in densities of 214 individuals/km2 and that Eulemur fulvus rufus lived in densities of 1,120 individuals/km2. Both densities are the highest ever recorded for any unprovisioned L. catta and E. f. rufus populations (Sussman 1972; Gerson 1999; Overdorff et al. 1999; Sussman et al. 2006). Last, in 1974, A. Richard accompanied Sussman to Antserananomby Forest and identified 86 Propithecus verreauxi verreauxi in mean group sizes of 7.8 (Richard 1978), with a conservative density estimate of 860 individuals/km2. These numbers are the highest mean group size and density numbers recorded for these taxa (Table 1).

At the time of these studies, it was not only the researchers who recognized the value of Antserananomby Forest. The people of this region were also aware of Antserananomby Forest's richness and would mention this forest whenever they were asked about local plants or animals. Hunting was forbidden within its boundaries by the inhabitants of the neighboring village (Antserananomby) because it was perceived as a sacred site (Sussman 1972).

Figure 1.

Location of Antserananomby.

Table 1.

Density estimates of Propithecus v. verreauxi and Eulemur fulvus rufus in the surrounding forests of the former site of Antserananomby.

In an effort to conserve the area's unique flora and fauna, Sussman and colleagues Ian Tattersall and Joelisoa Ratsirarson recently planned to begin the process to establish Antserananomby Forest and the surrounding forests as a national reserve. These plans were encouraged by satellite images from 2000, which indicated that the forests of Antserananomby, including Antserananomby Forest, were still intact (Sussman et al. 2003). In 2001 and 2004, surveys ware conducted to ground truth the information conveyed by the satellite images. During our surveys, however, we found that conditions in the region had changed radically since the 1970s–1980s. A number of major socio-economic changes had transformed the region, including the immigration of people who did not respect the taboos (fadys) of the previous local inhabitants and the introduction of new crops. In this paper, we present a vivid example of how drastic changes can occur within a very short period of time, forever eliminating unique ecological communities and habitats. Many of the extremely rich but small, mainly undisturbed, natural habitats are not perpetuated as recognized protected reserves but, instead, by the beliefs and practices of the local people (Smith 1997; Clark et al. 1998; Golding and Folke 2000; Harpet et al. 2000; Casse et al. 2004; Bodin et al. 2006; Green et al. unpubl. ms.). A greater attempt must be made to protect these areas. As stated by Smith (1997: pp.438 & 440) “It is evident that in Madagascar, as in many countries, reserves have been primarily located in areas unsuitable—or least suitable—for alternative use and development. This strategy is likely to have caused the extinction of many species and the loss of some of the best examples of Western dry forest.”


Earlier censuses were conducted at Antserananomby by Sussman and colleagues in 1970 and 1974. In 1970, all groups of L. catta and E. f. rufus living within the 9–10 ha gallery forest at Antserananomby were censused weekly or biweekly between July and September. There were 12 groups of red-fronted lemur with a total of approximately 112 animals, and 1 group of ringtailed lemurs containing 19 individuals (Sussman 1972). In 1974, all groups of R v. verreauxi inhabiting the same forest were identified and then censused repeatedly by A. Richard and R. W. Sussman during the month of July. There were 10 groups with a total of 58 individuals (Richard 1978). The forest was in a circumscribed area with a relatively low continuous canopy with exceptional visibility, and groups were easily observed and censused.

In August 2004, Kelley and Muldoon revisited Antserananomby to 1) determine whether this site could feasibly become a location for long-term ecological research and to 2) assess whether efforts to establish Antserananomby Forest as a national reserve should continue. In addition, we conducted a diurnal primate survey using Buckland et al. 's (2001) line-transect sampling method (see also Burnham and Anderson 1976; Burnham et al. 1980). This method was chosen over other methods, such as point transects, because line transect surveys are ideal for animals such as primates that 1) typically occur in low densities, 2) have large home ranges, and 3) are difficult to detect unless disturbed (Whitesides et al. 1988; Buckland et al. 2001; Ross and Reeve 2003). Since the gallery forest at Antserananomby no longer existed, the methods used in earlier years were no longer feasible. Permission to conduct this study was granted through the University of Antananarivo. The data collection methods are in compliance with the legal requirements for ecological research in Madagascar. Here we report on the census data collected on the diurnal lemur species in 2004.

Data collection

Data collection for the line-transect surveys took place from 8 August 2004 to 27 August 2004. A total of 122 hours were spent collecting line transect data within a total area of 5.9 km2. The hours of data collection coincided with the diurnal/cathemeral lemurs' peak activity (Sussman 1972; Ganzhorn 1995; Müller et al. 2000). Morning data were collected from 06:30 to 12:30. At 1500, we would survey a different forest fragment because it minimized the risk that the same group would be counted twice in the same day (Ross and Reeve 2003). We collected afternoon data until approximately 18:00 hr. For each lemur sighting, we collected the following data: a) the time of sighting, b) Geographic Positioning System (GPS) readings (latitude, longitude, elevation, accuracy), c) the distance between us and the individual or central member in the group of lemurs, d) the number of observed adults and subadults, e) the initial canopy height of the lemurs, f) the compass direction the team was traveling when the lemur(s) were spotted, g) the compass direction of the lemur(s) in relation to the field team, and h) the compass direction the lemur(s) were traveling if they were moving when seen. Notes on general behavior were also recorded ad libitum. Only actual sightings were counted (Ganzhorn 1995; Müller et al. 2000). If we suspected that a group or individual had already been counted, we did not record that sighting.

Data analysis

GPS data on lemur sightings were plotted on a LANDSAT 7 ETM + image to indicate where these groups were found relative to: 1) the Ianandranto River, the only water source, 2) villages, and 3) other landmarks. Measurement errors were corrected by referring to notes on landscape features that fell within the accuracy ranges measured by the GPS.

Density estimates for P. v. verreauxi and E. f. rufus were analyzed using Distance 5.0 Beta 5 (Thomas et al. 2005). The sample size of L. catta was too low for this analysis (Buckland et al. 2001). Prior to density analyses, sightings distance data were visualized in box plots and histograms using SPSS 11.5. Based on these results, the observation width for P. v. verreauxi was truncated to 59 m, and the observation width for E. f. rufus was truncated to 25 m. Density estimates were obtained using the uniform + cosine (Fourier series) estimator (Grain et al. 1979;Burnham et al. 1980;Buckland et al. 2001). Group size and density estimates were the same regardless of whether group size estimates were obtained using mean cluster size or the size-regression method.


Upon arrival at Antserananomby, it immediately became apparent that a great deal of change had occurred in the region since the 1970s (Fig. 2). First, the site of the old Antserananomby village is now barren savanna. Second, Antserananomby Forest is gone. Third, lemur traps, of which we observed four, were found within the remaining fragmented forests.

Seven of the eight lemur species that were known to inhabit Antserananomby Forest were observed during the survey, however: E. f. rufus, L. catta, L. r. ruficaudatus, Microcebus murinus, Mirza coquereli, P. furcifer, and P. v. verreauxi. The only species that was not sighted, Cheirogaleus medius, hibernates during the austral winter (Sussman 1972; Hladik et al., 1980).

Since surveys were conducted only during the day, density estimates were not obtained for the nocturnal species. Among the three diurnal/cathemeral species, P. v. verreauxi was the most frequently sighted and widely dispersed. Over half of the 202 group sightings (which sometimes consisted of a single individual) were of Verreaux's sifaka (n = 134), and four sifaka females were observed with infants. While the mean observed group size for this species was 3.6 (Table 1), one group contained 12 individuals. This species could be observed as far as 250 m away in the hillier areas of the region. In addition, P. v. verreauxi was the only species to be observed in groups of three or more within 500 m of Antserananomby village. As of 2004, we estimate the population density of Verreaux's sifaka at Antserananomby to be 49 individuals/ km2. The second most frequently sighted of the three species was E. f. rufus (n = 58). These sightings often consisted of a lone individual or a pair, although the average group size was slightly higher (Table 1). The population density of this species was estimated to be 23.9 individuals/km2. Lemur catta was only observed 10 times. With the exception of a troop that we sighted almost 125 m away, the species reacted to our presence every time. Consequently, half of the L. catta sightings were of a single individual (n = 5).

Most notable during the surveys were the observations of two mixed species groups. In this context, we have defined mixed-species groups as groups with individuals of two species that travel, feed, and/or rest together as would one with individuals of a single species. Both groups that met this definition were seen together more than once over a 24-hour time period. The first group, of five Verreaux's sifakas and three red-fronted lemurs, was observed in a continuous canopy forest fragment just five minutes from camp. This forest fragment was near a burning forest patch, and parts of the forest near the camp were also smoldering. One of the two E. f. rufus infants that were sighted during the survey was observed in this group. The second mixed group was of seven red-fronted lemurs and eight ringtailed lemurs. It was seen traveling and feeding near the Ianadranto River, the only running water in the region during the austral winter. This mixed-species group had the largest number of E. f. rufus found near this river, and the only young ringtailed lemur seen throughout the study. Last, it is of interest to note that the second time the second group was observed, it was seen traveling through the exact same location with the same number of individuals, but with a single Verreaux's sifaka tailing the group.

Figure 2.

Comparison of the general Antserananomby area. Figure 2a was taken on the dried Beangily river bed and is an image of Antserananomby Forest in 1970. Figure 2b is a view of the same general area in 2004 as it looked from the bank of the Beangily River. Notice the fire smoldering across the remaining forest fragments in the 2004 photograph.


Primate survey

Based on six years of observations, Appert (1966) wrote that the most widespread and frequently sighted of the diurnal primate species in the Mangoky/Antserananomby region was Verreaux's sifaka, and the least frequently sighted was the redfronted lemur. Although it does not appear that Appert surveyed our area, our results are relatively consistent. Since in western Madagascar red-fronted lemurs are restricted largely to the dense middle canopies of deciduous and gallery forests (Sussman 2003; Müller et al. 2000), habitat type may be an important reason why the red-fronted lemur had a high local density at Antserananomby Forest but not elsewhere.

However, the results of our survey clearly indicated that the overall densities of red-fronted lemurs and ringtailed lemurs have declined appreciably within the last few decades. Even Verreaux's sifaka, which appeared to be faring somewhat better relative to the other two species in this region, was found at a much lower density than is typical for this species (49 individuals/km2 compared with 80–550 individuals/km2, Table 1), when approximately 30 years earlier it had the highest recorded density for sifakas (Sussman 2003). Similarly, although we did not systematically conduct nocturnal surveys, due to the complete loss of rich gallery forest habitat where the high density of these species was observed in earlier surveys, there is no doubt that the L. ruficaudatus and P. furcifer populations have also declined markedly. These two species are largely restricted to undisturbed primary canopy forests in this region (Smith et al. 1997, Sussman pers. obs.).

Last, we believe that the mixed species groups are the residual results of crowding (Hagan et al. 1996). In the example of the sifaka and red-fronted lemur group, fires were burning in the surrounding forest fragments. It is likely that what was observed was a demographic “concussion” in which individuals from both species were forced to reside within the same fragmented forest patch (Hagan et al. 1996). This is the only group of red-fronted lemurs that was found near camp. Similarly, since running drinking water is very important for red-fronted lemurs (Scholz and Kappeler 2004); it is of note that the mixed species group that inhabited the fragment by the river had the largest number of E. f. rufus. It is possible that cohabitation with L. catta was the best opportunity these red-fronted lemurs had for gaining access to the water.

Causes of the recent changes at Antserananomby

Appert (1966) noted unsustainable rates of deforestation within the Mangoky/Antserananomby region as early as the 1960s. Antserananomby Forest was always an exception, however, because it was protected by the local villagers (Sussman, 1972). There is evidence that the causes for the forest's recent demise are human migration and the introduction of maize.

In the late 1970s, many of the original inhabitants of Antserananomby Village died from an epidemic disease, and the village was abandoned (Sussman unpubl. data), and the town of Vondrove, which used to be the closest center of economic activity to Antserananomby, also started to decline (Sussman et al. 2003). Today, all that remains of Vondrove is a small village. The Antserananomby area, which has been sparsely inhabited for many years, has recently been resettled by immigrants who lack the restrictions on clearing the forest and hunting the lemurs that were maintained by earlier inhabitants (R. W. and L. K. Sussman, unpubl. data). Given this, it is interesting to note that Verreaux's sifaka, the largest and most visible species at this site, is also the only species that could readily be found resting there, and at ease in close proximity to the village.

In addition, maize is a new crop to Antserananomby that was not present during the 1970s research (R. W. and L. K. Sussman, unpubl. data). Unlike crops such as cassava and sweet potatoes, maize requires hatsaka (Horning 2000; Horning 2003; Sussman et al. 2003). Hatsaka is a type of slashand-burn agriculture in which forests are cut in one to six ha patches and burned (Ferguson 2002; Sussman et al. 2003; Casse et al. 2004). As this agricultural practice is technically illegal in Madagascar, hatsaka is more commonly practiced in isolated areas (Jarosz 1993; Casse et al. 2004]. Economists who have studied the effects of maize cropping south of the Antserananomby region have found that hatsaka is the primary reason for forest clearance [Casse et al. 2004]. During our 2004 survey, hatsaka was the major crop in the area surrounding Antserananomby. Although maize was not yet being grown on the plot that was once the Antserananomby gallery forest, future maize cropping is undoubtedly the reason for its recent clearance (Bernard Tsiefatao pers. comm.).


In the volume accompanying the vegetation map published in 1965, Humbert and Cours Darne described the type of forest represented by Antserananomby Forest as almost totally destroyed with only rare vestiges still remaining (Humbert, 1965, p.70). Moreover, deciduous dry forests in Madagascar have declined from 12.5% of the original cover in 1950 to only 2.8% in 1990 (Smith, 1997, p.426). Since Antserananomby Forest and some of the remaining forests were likely included in the 1990 percentage, its recent disappearance suggests that current estimates of remaining dry forests in Madagascar are even smaller.

Since forest regeneration in southwest Madagascar is slow to non-existent once large portions of a forest have been cleared (Sussman et al. 2003 ; Casse et al. 2004), future conservation efforts at Antserananomby could serve as a case study for whether an environment that has rapidly degenerated in recent years can be repaired. In the best case scenario, future research with applied conservation efforts at Antserananomby could result in environmentally sustainable sustenance alternatives for the local human population, the protection of lemur species, and the initiation of collaborative interests among the local community, the Malagasy government, and the scientific community. Yet achieving these aims will be a major challenge. Logistically, this area is often inaccessible for nine months of the year and a follow-up attempt to visit this site in 2005 failed, partly because of its remoteness. In addition, it is possible that the densities of some of the primate species, most notably red-fronted lemurs and ringtailed lemurs are already too low for successful recovery. Yet if the remaining forests in the region of Antserananomby disappear, then the region's villagers will likely have to move to forested areas with fertile land, if any still exist, where the destructive processes that are occurring at Antserananomby will be perpetuated. Conserving what is left of the region's biodiversity will not only benefit the immediate area, it will also benefit three of the world's most unique and critically endangered ecosystems—the spiny and succulent xerophytic forests of southern Madagascar, the rapidly disappearing deciduous forests of the northwest, and especially the extremely rare, lush forests of the small transition area that contains the unique flora and fauna between the two.

The loss of the gallery forest of Antserananomby offers another example of the importance of local beliefs and practices, and of “sacred forest” in the preservation of small but extremely rich and unique ecological communities and habitats throughout Madagascar and elsewhere. In the region between the Morondava and Mongoky rivers, we are observing a rich and unique habitat disappear before our eyes. The question is whether anything can, or will, be done to prevent this irreversible tragedy.


Transportation, letter of intent, and permission to conduct this research was provided by the University of Antananarivo's School of Agronomy, notably by Prof. Joelisoa Ratsirarson. We warmly thank him for his support and assistance. Ony Andrianasolondraibe played an integral role at the field site as translator, and her assistance in collecting the data is greatly appreciated. We also thank Brad Kelley and two anonymous reviewers who gave us very useful suggestions. This project was supported in part by the Washington University Anthropology Summer Travel Grant [EAK]. We wish to thank Washington University's Graduate School of Arts and Sciences for providing this funding. This project adhered to the research protocols of Madagascar.

Literature Cited


O. Appert 1966. La distribution geographique des lemuriens diurnes de la region du Mangoky au sud-ouest de Madagascar. Bull. l' Académie Malgache 44: 43–45. Google Scholar


O. Appert 1968. Neues zur lebensweise und verbreitung des kurols, Leptosomus discolour (Hermann). J. Ornitologie 109: 116–126. Google Scholar


O. Appert 1970a. Zur biologie der Vangawürger (Vangidae) südwest-Madagaskars. Der Ornithologische Beobachter 67: 101–133. Google Scholar


O. Appert 1970b. Zur biologie einiger kua-arten Madaskars. Zoologische Jahrbu'cher. Abteilung für System 97: 424–453. Google Scholar


O. Appert 1980. Erste farbaufnahmen der rachenzeichnung junger kuas von Madagaskar (Cuculi, Couinae). Der Ornithologische Beobachter 77: 85 –101. Google Scholar


Ö Bodin , M. Tengö , A. Norman , J. Lundberg and T. Elmqvist . 2006. The value of small size: Loss of forest patches and ecological thresholds in southern Madagascar. Ecol Applications 16: 440 – 451. Google Scholar


S. T. Buckland , D. R. Anderson , K. P. Burnham , J. L. Laake , D. L. Borchers and L. Thomas . 2001. Introduction to Distance Sampling. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Google Scholar


K. P. Burnham and D. R. Anderson . 1976. Mathematical models for nonparametric inferences from line transect data. Biometrics 32: 325–336. Google Scholar


K. P. Burnham , D. R. Anderson and J. L. Laake . 1980. Estimation of density from line transect sampling of biological population. Wildl. Monog. 72: 1–202. Google Scholar


T. Casse , A. Milhøj , S. Ranaivoson and J. R. Randriamanarivo . 2004. Causes of deforestation in southwestern Madagascar: What do we know? For. Policy. Econ. 6: 33–48. Google Scholar


C. D. Clark , S. M. Garrod and M. Parker Pearson . 1998. Landscape archaeology and remote sensing in southern Madagascar. Int. J. Remote Sensing 19: 1461 –1477. Google Scholar


B. R. Grain , K. P. Burnham , D. R. Anderson and J. L. Laake . 1979. Nonparametric estimation of population density for line transect sampling using Fourier series. Biom. J. 21: 731–748. Google Scholar


B. Ferguson 2002. Opportunities for Community Based Conservation in the Androy Region of Madagascar's Southern Spiny Forest. The Tandroy Conservation Trust, Ifotaka, Androy, Madagascar. 25pp. Google Scholar


J. U. Ganzhorn 1995. Low-level forest disturbance effects on primary production, leaf chemistry, and lemur populations. Ecology 76: 2084–2096. Google Scholar


J. S. Gerson 1999. Social relationships in wild red-fronted lemurs (Eulemur fulvus rufus). Doctoral dissertation, Duke University, Durham, NC. Google Scholar


J. Golding and C. Folke . 2000. The taboo system: lessons about informal institutions for nature management. The Georgetown International Law Review 12: 413–445. Google Scholar


G. M. Green , R. W. Sussman and S. P. Sweeney . Undated. Stability in a convolving mosaic of land-cover change episodes: conservation by sacred forests in southwestern and southern Madagascar. Unpublished manuscript. Google Scholar


J. M. Hagan , W. M. V. Haegen and P. S. McKinley . 1996. The early development of forest fragmentation effects on birds. Conserv. Biol. 10: 188–202. Google Scholar


C. Harpet , J. Vololoniaina and C. M. Hladik . 2000. Sacred lemur sites in the Sakalava region of north-west Madagascar; updated data and implications for sustained development and conservation., Rev. d'Ecol. La Terre et la Vie 55: 291–295. Google Scholar


C. M. Hladik , P. Charles-Dominique and J. J. Petter . 1980. Feeding strategies of five nocturnal prosimians in the dry forest of the west coast of Madagascar. In: Nocturnal Malagasy Primates: Ecology, Physiology, and Behavior , P. Charles-Dominique , H. M. Cooper , A. Hladik , C. M. Hladik , E. Pages , G. F. Pariente , A. Petter-Rousseaux , J. J. Petter (eds.), pp.41–73. Academic Press, New York. Google Scholar


N. R. Horning 2000. Explaining compliance with rules governing common-pool forest resource use and conservation: dynamics in Bara country, southwestern Madagascar. Meetings paper for the International Association for the Study of Common Property , Bloomington, Indiana 31 May - 4 June 2000. 29pp. Available at: <;. Accessed 26 January 2007. Google Scholar


N. R. Horning 2003. How rules affect conservation outcomes. In: The Natural History of Madagascar, S. M. Goodman and J. P. Benstead (eds.), pp.146–153. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. Google Scholar


H. Humbert 1965. Description des types de végétation. In: Notice de la Carte Madagascar , H. Humbert and G. Cours Darne (eds.), pp.46–78. L'Institut Francais de Pondichery, Pondichery. Google Scholar


L. Jarosz 1993. Defining and explaining tropical deforestation: shifting cultivation and population growth in colonial Madagascar (18961940). Econ. Geogr. 69: 366–379. Google Scholar


A. Jolly , H. Gustafson , W. L. R. Oliver and S. M. O'Connor . 1982. Propithecus verreauxi population and ranging at Berenty, Madagascar. 1975 and 1980. Folia Primatol 39: 124–144. Google Scholar


P Müller , A. Velo , E. O. Raheliarisoa , A. Zaramody and D. J. Curtis . 2000. Surveys of sympatric lemurs at Anjamena, north-west Madagascar. Afr. J. Ecol 38: 248–257. Google Scholar


D. J. Overdorff , P. T. Merenlender , A. Telo and Z. A. Forward . 1999. Life history of Eulemur fulvus rufus from 1988–1998 in southeastern Madagascar. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol 108:295–310. Google Scholar


J. J. Petter , A. Schilling and G. Pariente . 1971. Observations eco-ethologiques sur deux lemuriens Malgaches nocturnes: Phaner furcifer et Microcebus coquereli. Extrait de la Terre et la Vie 3. 287–327. Google Scholar


A. F. Richard 1978. Behavioral Variation: Case Study of a Malagasy Lemur. Associated University Presses, Inc., Cranbury, NJ. Google Scholar


A. F. Richard , P. Rakotomanga and M. Schwartz . 1993. Dispersal by Propithecus verreauxi at Beza Mahafaly, Madagascar. Am. J. Primatol. 30: 1–20. Google Scholar


C. Ross and N. Reeve . 2003. Survey and census methods. In: Field and Laboratory Methods in Primatology , J. M. Setchell and D. J. Curtis (eds.), pp.90–109. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Google Scholar


F. Scholz and P. M. Kappeler . 2004.Effects of seasonal water scarcity on the ranging behavior of Eulemur fulvus rufus. Int. J. Primatol. 25: 599–613. Google Scholar


A. P. Smith 1997. Deforestation, fragmentation, and reserve design in western Madagascar. In: Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management, and Conservation of Fragmented Communities , W. F. Lawrence and R. O. Bierregaard Jr. (eds.), pp.415–441. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. Google Scholar


A. P. Smith , N. Horning and D. Moore 1997. Regional biodiversity planning and lemur conservation with GIS in western Madagascar. Conserv. Biol 11: 498–512. Google Scholar


R. W. Sussman 1972. An ecological study of two Madagascan primates: Lemur fulvus rufus (Audebert) and Lemur catta (Linnaeus). Doctoral dissertation, Duke University Durham, NC. Google Scholar


R. W. Sussman 1974. Ecological distinctions in sympatric species of Lemur. In: Prosimian Biology , R. D. Martin , G. A. Doyle , A. C. Walker (eds.), pp.75–108. Duckworth, London. Google Scholar


R. W. Sussman 2003. Primate Ecology and Social Structure , Vol. 1. Pearson Custom Publishing, Needham Heights, MA. Google Scholar


R. W. Sussman , G. M. Green , I. Porton , O. L. Andrianasolondraibe and J. Ratsirarson . 2003. A survey of the habitat of Lemur catta in southwestern and southern Madagascar. Primate Conserv. (19): 32–57. Google Scholar


R. W. Sussman , S. Sweeney S , G. M. Green , I. Porton , O. L. Andrianasolondraibe and J. Ratsirarson . 2006. A preliminary estimate of Lemur catta population density using satellite imagery. In: Ring-tailed Lemur Biology , A. Jolly , R. W. Sussman , N. Koyama , and H. R. Rasamimanana (eds.), pp. 16–31. Springer, New York. Google Scholar


L. Thomas , J. L. Laake , S. Strindberg , F. F. C. Marques , S. T. Buckland , D. L. Borchers , D. R. Anderson , K. P. Burnham , S. L. Hedley , J. H. Pollard , J. R. B. Bishop and T. A. Marques . 2005. Distance 5.0. Release Beta 5. Research Unit for Wildlife Population Assessment, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, UK: Available at: <>. Accessed 14 February 2007. Google Scholar


G. H. Whitesides , J. F. Oates , S. M. Green and R. P. Kluberdanz . 1988. Estimating primate densities from transects in a West African rain forest: A comparison of techniques. J. Anim. Ecol 57: 345–367. Google Scholar


[1] Authors ' addresses:

Elizabeth A. Kelley and Robert W. Sussman, Department of Anthropology, Campus Box 1114, 112 McMillan Hall, Washington University, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO, 63130–4899, USA. E-mail:<>.

Kathleen M. Muldoon, Department of Anatomy, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, USA.

Elizabeth A. Kelley, Robert W. Sussman, and Kathleen M. Muldoon "The Status of Lemur Species at Antserananomby: An Update," Primate Conservation 22(1), 71-77, (1 January 2007).
Received: 12 March 2007; Accepted: 29 June 2007; Published: 1 January 2007
critically endangered ecoregion
sacred forests
Back to Top