Translator Disclaimer
1 January 2007 A New Population of De Brazza's Monkey in Kenya
Iregi Mwenja
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Until recently, de Brazza's monkey (Cercopithecus neglectus) was not known to occur east of the Great Rift Valley in Kenya. However, after eight months of intensive surveys in the remote and isolated Mathews Range Forest Reserve of Samburu, we were able to count a total of 162 de Brazza's monkeys in 24 groups; including 139 adults and sub-adults and 23 infants. They were found in ten separate laggas distributed throughout the mountain range, with the highest concentration in the central part of the reserve. By extrapolating information gathered on this study—from interviews and field observations—the population of the entire Mathews Range Forest Reserve was estimated at 200–300. Although the threats arising from the human activities in the forest ecosystem are generally minimal, they were considerable on the lower elevations, affecting especially this species. The most affected habitats are those near human settlements on the lower altitudes (where 75% of the total population of de Brazza's monkeys occurs) since they are easily accessible. During the onset of the dry season and periods of drought, communities invade these areas with large herds of livestock, where they feed them on leaves of evergreen tree species such as Faidherbia albida, Ficus sp., and Olea sp. The people cut the branches almost denuding the tree. These species are important in the diet of de Brazza's monkey. The study resulted in the first record of de Brazza's monkeys occurring above 2,100 m above sea level. They were seen in Olkaela in the Mathews range at an elevation of 2,203 m.

Introduction

De Brazza's monkey (Cercopithecus neglectus) is one of the most unusual species in the group of Old World monkeys commonly known as guenons (Nowak 1991; MacDonald 1993). They live in forests along the banks of streams and rivers, at the mid or lower canopy layers of the forest. De Brazza's are arboreal, spending 70% of their time in the understorey and 20% on the ground (Gautier-Hion 1988). They are good swimmers. They feed mainly on fruits and seeds, leaves, arthropods, flowers and mushrooms (Staaden 1996).

The species is fairly common in its core range, in riparian and swamp forests in the Congo Basin, in southeast Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea, and Angola. It is rare, and found only in isolated pockets, in some parts of extreme east and west Uganda, western Kenya and southwest Ethiopia (Brennan 1984; Decker 1995). Although large populations of de Brazza's monkey exist in central Africa (Gautier-Hion and Gautier 1978), the population in Kenya is small and under immense anthropogenic pressure (Brennan and Else 1984; Brennan 1985; Decker 1995).

In Kenya, knowledge on the distribution of de Brazza's monkey has expanded over the years, as interest has increased in the study of this species. Prior to a report by Booth (1962), the species was believed to be restricted to the western slopes of Mt. Elgon. Booth (1962) reported that it also occurred 60 km further east in the Cherangani Hills. Its range was found to extend northwards to southwest Ethiopia by Brown and Urban in 1969 (Wahome, 1993). Brennan (1984) found further groups in the western range of the species, between Mt. Elgon and Cherangani, while Wahome (1989) extended its southern range to Kisere forest, north of Kakamega forest. Mwenja (2004) added more new sightings in the region; more than tripling the known population in Kenya. Douglas-Dufresne (2005) reported a new population of the species in the Mathews Range, the first found east of the Rift Valley: before then, the species was believed to be restricted to western Kenya (Brennan 1985; Decker 1995; Karere 1995).

In Kenya, threats to the survival of de Brazza's monkey arise mainly from the rampant deforestation caused by the ever-increasing demand for firewood, timber and farmland, and accompanying growth of human settlements. Their diminishing forests result in small populations, reduced opportunities for dispersal, and heightened competition from other species (Brennan 1984; Olubayo 1998). Those that have survived have been, and continue to be, pushed to higher altitudes along the rivers, or are left in small, isolated remnant habitats that cannot sustain them, and expose them to poaching (Mwenja 2004). Today, the majority of the population is spread through very thin, increasingly fragmented, strips of riparian forest on private farms; usually in small, isolated groups. These pockets of habitat maintain populations of only a few individuals, which may not be genetically viable (Brennan 1984; Mwenja 2004). However, the situation in Mathews Range Forest Reserve is different, given that it suffers little anthropogenic pressure (Bronner 1990; Blackett 1994) when compared to western Kenya.

Study Area and Methods

The Mathews Range Forest Reserve was originally gazetted in 1956 as a Crown Forest, due to its importance as a water catchment area (Fig. 2). In 1964, it was declared a Central Forest with an area of 93,765 ha. The mean annual rainfall is 700 mm at lower elevations and 1100 mm at the top of the range, with a peak in October and April. The minimum temperatures range from 14°C–20°C in the dry season. Daily maximum temperature exceeds 30°C in the dry season (Bronner 1990; Blackett 1994). There are three main forest types found in Mathews Range: those dominated by Croton megalocarpus; Juniperus/Juniperus-Olea; and mixed Podocarpus (Beentje 1990; Blackett 1994).

The Mathews Range forms the southern part of a mountain chain (formed since the Precambrian) that crosses the savannah plains of Samburu. The soils, developed on an undifferentiated basement system, are somewhat excessively drained, shallow to moderate deep, reddish brown, friable sandy clay loams. The lower slopes of the mountains are rocky, and at the higher elevation the soils are quite acidic (Blackett 1994).

The survey was carried out from 14 May 2007 to 28 December 2007, covering a total of 53 km within the selected survey transects (Table 1). I used general survey methods suitable for collection of data on geographical distribution, estimating densities, and assessing habitat, as well as obtaining limited information on age and sex composition, as described by Struhsaker (1981). Given that de Brazza's monkey is largely riparian (Hill 1966; Kingdon 1974; Gautier-Hion and Gautier 1978), all field visits were directed at surveying river valleys (laggas). I surveyed in the morning hours, from 08:00 to 11:00, and in the afternoon from 15:00 to 17:00 when the monkeys are active. I walked along the laggas slowly and quietly, at less than 1 km/hr, stopping every 60 m for 50 seconds (Butynski 1984).

Time spent on each lagga depended on its length and accessibility. Adjacent laggas were surveyed concurrently to avoid the error of double counting. Each lagga was surveyed at least twice during both the dry and wet seasons to increase the chances of sighting the monkeys. Surveys were made throughout the altitudinal range of 800 m to 2,400 m above sea level. The data collected included: date, name of the location, time spent (starting and finishing time), number sighted (adults and young), activity, association with other animals, tree species, elevation, GPS co-ordinates, mode of detection, and any other aspects of interest. Each data sheet represented one lagga, which in turn represented a single transect or sampling unit.

Interviews targeted people living near the forest and those who would visit it regularly. The livelihoods of the Dorobo depend on the forest, and they were the key respondents given their knowledge and understanding of its biodiversity. Interviews complimented the data collected from the field surveys.

Results

A total of 162 de Brazza's monkeys in 24 groups were counted during the survey. These included 139 adults and sub-adults and 23 infants (Table 1). These were found in ten separate laggas throughout the mountain range, save for the northwestern part where the presence of the species needs to be investigated further. By extrapolating information gathered on this study—from interviews and field observations—the population of the entire Mathews Range Forest Reserve was estimated at 200–300. The first ever record of de Brazza's monkey occurring above 2,100 m above sea level was recorded in the Mathews Range at 2,203 m at Olkaela.

Figure 1.

The map of distribution of de Brazza's monkey (Cercopithecus meglectus) in Africa, showing the newly discovered population in Mathews Range Forest Reserve (black dot), the first record of the species east of the Great Rift Valley.

The areas where these 24 groups were found at high elevations and in the interior of the forest, included Napuruwaso, Olkaera, Manoea, Rapaelpapit Nachapa, Kiserian, Kojos, Ntukuda and Wamba. At Nkii, Murit, Miwaa, Sitin, Ngare narok and Ngare naibor, they were found at lower elevations and along forest edges.

Although the threats arising from the human activities in the forest are generally minimal, their impact at the more easily accessible lower elevations of Ngare narok, Nkii, Sitin Miwaa and Murit during the dry season is significant. During the dry season and periods of drought, these areas are invaded, and when the browse is exhausted cattle are taken into the interior of the forest, where they are fed leaves of evergreen trees such as Faidherbia albida, Ficus spp., and Olea spp. by cutting the branches and practically denuding the trees. These species happen to be some of the most preferred by de Brazza's monkeys; hence the conflict.

The forest and the vegetation along the rivers are often burnt, either by the honey collectors or livestock keepers, in order to trigger pasture regeneration and control ticks. Areas near settlements are largely grazed, but more distant areas are also affected by honey harvesting—often leading to forest fires. We found no signs of direct persecution of the de Brazza's monkeys by the local people: poaching/hunting, poisoning, or snaring were not evident in the area. As a result the Forest Reserve is currently one of the least disturbed habitats for de Brazza's monkeys in Kenya. The people living there are pastoralists, and their culture does not allow them to kill wildlife for food. Its cousin, Colobus guereza percivali, listed as Endangered on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, on the other hand, is killed for the beautiful skins it provides.

Discussion

Obviously, this relatively large population of an otherwise rare species has been thriving in the Mathews Range for many years. The species' quiet nature, large inter-individual distances within groups (Gautier-Hion and Gautier 1978), relatively small group sizes, and, unlike other primates, rare use of group calls, and lack of alarm calls (Maté et al. 1995), explain why so little is known about it there. The area is also remote and has a history of insecurity that has made it difficult for biologists to work there. According to Kingdon (1974), Brennan (1984) and Wahome (1989), de Brazza's monkeys keep close to water ranging not farther than 200 m. away. All the de Brazza's monkeys seen in the Mathews Range were within 200 m of water, except for one group at Ntukuda that was seen 1,000 m away from the nearest water, probably the first such record.

Seven of the ten most preferred plants, which make up 80% of the de Brazza's monkey's diet in Kisere Forest Reserve (Wahome 1989) are also found in the Mathews Range (Blackett 1994) where they are also among the most preferred species (see Table 2). This implies that the habitat of this satellite population is similar to those occupied by de Brazza's monkeys in western Kenya. It also explains why the species is present in Kisere but absent in neighboring forests in western Kenya, such as South Nandi, Buyangu and Isecheno forests of the wider Kakamega forest (Mwenja 2006) which have significant differences in their floristic communities and lacking de Brazza's monkeys' most preferred plant species (Karere 2000).

Figure 2.

Map of Kenya's Forest Reserves showing Mathews range Forest Reserve.

Figure 3.

Livestock grazing at Sitin, adjacent to an important area for de Brazza's monkeys in the Mathews Range, Kenya. Photo by Iregi Mwenja.

Other species exploited by de Brazza's monkeys in Kisere (Wahome 1989) and also found in Mathews Range Forest Reserve include: Ficus sur, Ficus sycomorus, Ficus natalensis, Trichilia emetica, Strychnos usambarensis, Dombeya spp., Diospyros abyssinica, and Croton megalocarpus.

The species is known to avoid polyspecific associations (Gautier-Hion and Gautier 1978; Wahome 1989), but I noted some association of de Brazza's monkey with other primates at Mathews Range, including the vervets and guereza colobus. This contrasts with my observations in western Kenya, where vervet monkeys keep a safe distance from de Brazza's monkeys (Mwenja 2006). At Ngare narok, vervet groups were seen on three occasions feeding in the same tree with de Brazza's monkeys. At Ntukuda, a group of guereza colobus was found together with a group of de Brazza's monkeys. This confirms Mwenja (2004), Wahome (1989) and Decker (1995) that the de Brazza's monkeys sometimes tolerate the colobus. The guereza colobus specialized on feeding at the top of the canopy, while the de Brazza's monkeys forage in the lower canopy layer (Gautier-Hion 1988; Wahome 1989). This niche differentiation between the colobus and de Brazza's monkeys is no doubt a key aspect in allowing them to coexist.

Table 1.

A summary of the distribution and abundance of de Brazza's monkey (Cercopithecus neglectus) in Mathews Range, Kenya.

Table 2.

The top ten most important species used by the de Brazza's monkey in Kisere Forest.

Figure 4.

De Brazza's monkey (Cercopithecus neglectus) at Ngare narok in the Mathews Range Forest Reserve, Kenya. Photo by Iregi Mwenja.

Kingdon (1971, 1997) put the highest elevation of the species at 2,100 m, but this was not the case for one group which I found at slightly above 2,200 m at Olkaela. However the overwhelming majority of the population inhabited areas below 2,100 m. Seventy-five percent of the population was concentrated between the elevations of 900 m to 1,300 m above sea level. The remaining 25% occurred at elevations between 1,300 m and 2,200 m.

Polygamous groups were the case for most of the groups in the Mathews Range, with most having a dominant male, making this population similar to others in Kenya (Brennen 1984; Wahome 1989; Mwenja 2004), but unlike those in the Gabon basin where they are evidently monogamous (Quris 1976; Gautier-Hion and Gautier 1978). Group sizes recorded ranged from 1–18, similar in size to those observed by Wahome (1993) in the Kisere Forest Reserve: 1–16 with an average of 10.1. Although the Mathews Range Forest Reserve recorded a higher population of de Brazza's monkeys than in any other Protected Area in Kenya, most people who live around the forest were unfamiliar with the species—22 (75%) of the 29 people interviewed had never seen it, a rather higher percentage than in western Kenya, where 40 (60%) of 67 people interviewed had no knowledge of the species (Mwenja 2006). The few people who know the animals are the ‘Dorobo’ people of the Samburu, who rely on forest products for their livelihood.

Richard Leakey (pers. comm.) suggests that a population that has been isolated for over 500,000 years is likely to speciate or at least exhibit genetic divergence from the mainstream population, and for this reason special value may need to be given to these de Brazza's monkeys, which may even have been isolated for a time sufficient for them to be considered a distinct subspecies.

Acknowledgments

I acknowledge the generous assistance from Fauna and Flora International (FFI) Flagship Species Fund (FSF) Small Grants Programme, Conservation International's Primate Action Fund, and Rufford Small Grants for Nature Conservation for funding this project; the Institute of Primate Research of the National Museums of Kenya, the Milgis Trust, Namunyak Wildlife Conservancy and East African Wildlife Society (EAWLS) for logistical support; and my mentor Dr. Richard Leakey for his guidance and invaluabe support.

Literature Cited

1.

H. J. Beentje 1990. The forests of Kenya. Mitteilingen des Instituts für Allgemeine Botanik Hamburg 23(a):265–286. Google Scholar

2.

R. Bernie 2005. Creating Sustainable Living in Kenya's Indigenous Forests. Report, Wilderness Foundation, UK. Google Scholar

3.

H. L. Blackett 1994. Forest inventory report of the Mathews Range Forest Reserve. KIFCON, Nairobi (8): 1–14. Google Scholar

4.

C. Booth 1962. Some observations of Cercopithecus monkeys. N. Y.Acad. Sci. 102: 477–487. Google Scholar

5.

E. J. Brennan 1985. De Brazza's monkeys (Cercopithecus neglectus) in Kenya: census, distribution and conservation. Am. J. Primatol. 8: 271–277. Google Scholar

6.

E. J. Brennan 1989. Demographics of captive de Brazza's guenons. Zoo Biol. 8: 37–47. Google Scholar

7.

E. J. Brennan and J. G. Else. 1984. Can Kenya's de Brazza's monkeys survive? Swara Magazine 7(3): 12–14. East African Wildlife Society (EAWLS), Nairobi. Google Scholar

8.

G. Bronner 1990. Vegetation and land use in Mathews Range area, Samburu District, Kenya. Dissertationes Botanicae 160: 1–182. Google Scholar

9.

T. M. Butynski 1985. Primates and their conservation in the Impenetrable (Bwindi) Forest, Uganda. Primate Conserv. (6): 68–72. Google Scholar

10.

B. S. Decker 1995. Survey of de Brazza's in Tororo district of eastern Uganda and Trans-Nzoia and west Pokot districts of western Kenya. J. East African Nat. Hist. 84(1): 25–34. Google Scholar

11.

H. Douglas-Dufresne 2005. Proof positive. Swara Magazine 28(2): 68. East African Wildlife Society (EAWLS), Nairobi. Google Scholar

12.

A. Gautier-Hion and J. P. Gautier . 1978. Le singe de Brazza: une strategie originale. Z. Tierpsychol. 46: 84–104. Google Scholar

13.

A. Gautier-Hion , F. Bourlière , J. P. Gautier and J. Kingdon (eds.). 1988. A Primate Radiation: Evolutionary Biology of the African Guenons. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Google Scholar

14.

G. M. Karere 1995. Survey of de Brazza's monkeys in Mt. Elgon and the Cherangani Hills, Western Kenya. Report, Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) and Institute of Primate Research, Nairobi. Google Scholar

15.

G. M. Karere 2000. Some Ecological Studies of De Brazza's Monkey (Cercopithecus neglectus) and its Habitat Prior to Translocation. MSc thesis, University of Nairobi, Nairobi. Google Scholar

16.

J. Kingdon 1997. The Kingdon Field Guide to African Mammals. Academic Press, London. Google Scholar

17.

D. W Macdonald (ed.). 1993. The Encyclopaedia of Mammals. Facts on File, New York. Google Scholar

18.

R. A. Mittermeier and D. L. Cheney. 1987. Conservation of primates and their habitats. In: Primate Societies , B. B. Smuts , D. L. Cheney , R. M. Seyfarth , R. W Wrangham and T. T. Struhsaker (eds.), pp.477–490. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago Google Scholar

19.

I. Mwenja 2004. National rapid durvey on the status and distribution of de Brazza's monkeys in Kenya. Swara Magazine 27(4): 18–21. East African Wildlife Society (EAWLS), Nairobi. Google Scholar

20.

I. Mwenja 2006. A detailed survey of de Brazza's monkey in western Kenya: focus on vulnerable groups outside protected areas. Report to East African Wildlife Society (EAWLS), Nairobi. Google Scholar

21.

R. M. Nowak 1991. Walker's Mammals of the World. Vol. 1. 5th edition. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. Google Scholar

22.

P. Quris 1976. Données comparatives sur la socioécologie de huit espèces de Cercopithecidae vivant dans une même zone de forêt primitive periodiquement inondée (nord-est du Gabon). Terre et Vie 30: 193–209. Google Scholar

23.

S. Staaden 1996. North American Regional Studbook for de Brazza's monkey, Cercopithecus neglectus. 1st edition. North Carolina Zoological Park, Asheboro, NC. Google Scholar

24.

T. T. Struhsaker 1981. Census methods for estimating densities. In: Techniques for the Study of Primate Population Ecology , pp.36–80. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. Google Scholar

25.

J. M. Wahome 1989. The Ecology of the De Brazza's Monkey (Cercopithecus neglectus Schlegel) in Kisere Forest Reserve. MSc Thesis University of Nairobi, Nairobi. Google Scholar

26.

J.M. Wahome 1993. The de Brazza's monkey: A species under siege in Kenya. Swara 16:33–34. Google Scholar

27.

J. H. Wolfheim 1983. Primates of the World: Distribution, Abundance, and Conservation.University of Washington Press, Seattle. Google Scholar

Notes

[1] Author's address:

Iregi Mwenja, Associate Research Scientist, Institute of Primate Research of the National Museums of Kenya, P.O. Box 606, Ruaraka, 0618, Kenya. E-mail: <iregim@yahoo.com>.

Iregi Mwenja "A New Population of De Brazza's Monkey in Kenya," Primate Conservation 22(1), 117-122, (1 January 2007). https://doi.org/10.1896/052.022.0111
Received: 1 July 2007; Accepted: 1 October 2007; Published: 1 January 2007
JOURNAL ARTICLE
6 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top