How to translate text using browser tools
1 January 2007 Secondary Carcinogenesis in Patients Treated with Radiation: A Review of Data on Radiation-Induced Cancers in Human, Non-human Primate, Canine and Rodent Subjects
Herman Suit, Saveli Goldberg, Andrzej Niemierko, Marek Ancukiewicz, Eric Hall, Michael Goitein, Winifred Wong, Harald Paganetti
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Suit, H., Goldberg, S., Niemierko, A., Ancukiewicz, M., Hall, E., Goitein, M., Wong, W. and Paganetti, H. Secondary Carcinogenesis in Patients Treated with Radiation: A Review of Data on Radiation-Induced Cancers in Human, Non-human Primate, Canine and Rodent Subjects. Radiat. Res. 167, 12–42 (2007).

Concern for risk of radiation-induced cancer is growing with the increasing number of cancer patients surviving long term. This study examined data on radiation transformation of mammalian cells in vitro and on the risk of an increased cancer incidence after irradiation of mice, dogs, monkeys, atomic bomb survivors, occupationally exposed persons, and patients treated with radiation. Transformation of cells lines in vitro increased linearly with dose from ∼1 to ∼4–5 Gy. At <0.1 Gy, transformation was not increased in all studies. Dose–response relationships for cancer incidence varied with mouse strain, gender and tissue/organ. Risk of cancer in Macaca mulatta was not raised at 0.25–2.8 Gy. From the atomic bomb survivor study, risk is accepted as increasing linearly to 2 Sv for establishing exposure standards. In irradiated patients, risk of cancer increased significantly from 1 to 45 Gy (a low to a high dose level) for stomach and pancreas, but not for bladder and rectum (1–60 Gy) or kidney (1–15 Gy). Risk for several organs/tissues increased substantially at doses far above 2 Gy. There is great heterogeneity in risk of radiation-associated cancer between species, strains of a species, and organs within a species. At present, the heterogeneity between and within patient populations of virtually every parameter considered in risk estimation results in substantial uncertainty in quantification of a general risk factor. An implication of this review is that reduced risks of secondary cancer should be achieved by any technique that achieved a dose reduction down to −0.1 Gy, i.e. dose to tissues distant from the target. The proportionate gain should be greatest for dose decrement to less than 2 Gy.

Herman Suit, Saveli Goldberg, Andrzej Niemierko, Marek Ancukiewicz, Eric Hall, Michael Goitein, Winifred Wong, and Harald Paganetti "Secondary Carcinogenesis in Patients Treated with Radiation: A Review of Data on Radiation-Induced Cancers in Human, Non-human Primate, Canine and Rodent Subjects," Radiation Research 167(1), 12-42, (1 January 2007). https://doi.org/10.1667/RR0527.1
Received: 29 December 2005; Accepted: 1 September 2006; Published: 1 January 2007
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top