Translator Disclaimer
5 March 2012 Genome-Wide Transcription Responses to Synchrotron Microbeam Radiotherapy
Carl N. Sprung, Yuqing Yang, Helen B. Forrester, Jason Li, Marina Zaitseva, Leonie Cann, Tina Restall, Robin L. Anderson, Jeffrey C. Crosbie, Peter A. W. Rogers
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The majority of cancer patients achieve benefit from radiotherapy. A significant limitation of radiotherapy is its relatively low therapeutic index, defined as the maximum radiation dose that causes acceptable normal tissue damage to the minimum dose required to achieve tumor control. Recently, a new radiotherapy modality using synchrotron-generated X-ray microbeam radiotherapy has been demonstrated in animal models to ablate tumors with concurrent sparing of normal tissue. Very little work has been undertaken into the cellular and molecular mechanisms that differentiate microbeam radiotherapy from broad beam. The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the whole genome transcriptional response of in vivo microbeam radiotherapy versus broad beam irradiated tumors. We hypothesized that gene expression changes after microbeam radiotherapy are different from those seen after broad beam. We found that in EMT6.5 tumors at 4–48 h postirradiation, microbeam radiotherapy differentially regulates a number of genes, including major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II antigen gene family members, and other immunity-related genes including Ciita, Ifng, Cxcl1, Cxcl9, Indo and Ubd when compared to broad beam. Our findings demonstrate molecular differences in the tumor response to microbeam versus broad beam irradiation and these differences provide insight into the underlying mechanisms of microbeam radiotherapy and broad beam.

Carl N. Sprung, Yuqing Yang, Helen B. Forrester, Jason Li, Marina Zaitseva, Leonie Cann, Tina Restall, Robin L. Anderson, Jeffrey C. Crosbie, and Peter A. W. Rogers "Genome-Wide Transcription Responses to Synchrotron Microbeam Radiotherapy," Radiation Research 178(4), 249-259, (5 March 2012). https://doi.org/10.1667/RR2885.1
Received: 2 December 2011; Accepted: 1 March 2012; Published: 5 March 2012
JOURNAL ARTICLE
11 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top