Translator Disclaimer
1 July 2017 The Contribution of Amenities to Landowner Income: Cases in Spanish and Californian Hardwood Rangelands
Jose L. Oviedo, Lynn Huntsinger, Pablo Campos
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Rangeland economists have noted that people tend to pay far more for ranches and rangelands than can be justified by the potential income from livestock operations alone. This gap in price can be explained when the value of the amenity benefits from owning a ranch and the capital gains from the rangeland investment are integrated as part of the “income” accruing to the landowner. In this paper, we apply an accounting framework that takes such values into account, the Agroforestry Accounting System, to three hardwood rangeland case studies in Andalucía (southern Spain) and three in California. We estimate how commercial operations, private amenities consumed by the landowner, and capital gains contribute to landowner income and rangeland investment profitability in these case studies. Results show that private amenity consumption and capital gains make the greatest contribution to landowner income.When these income components are included in the estimations, total real profitability ranges from 2.7% to 4.5% in the Spanish cases and from 4.5% to 7.8% in the California cases, rates that are competitive with alternative investments. Our results suggest that conservation programs may be strengthened by enhancing or building on amenity benefits to landowners, motivating them to engage in and continue with these programs. In addition, landowner willingness to pay for amenities may increase the costefficiency of programs that would enhance the provision of these, or of closely related, amenities.

© 2017 The Society for Range Management. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Jose L. Oviedo, Lynn Huntsinger, and Pablo Campos "The Contribution of Amenities to Landowner Income: Cases in Spanish and Californian Hardwood Rangelands," Rangeland Ecology and Management 70(4), 518-528, (1 July 2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2017.02.002
Received: 15 January 2016; Accepted: 1 February 2017; Published: 1 July 2017
JOURNAL ARTICLE
11 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top