Translator Disclaimer
1 January 2020 A new species of Goniacerini from Cameroon (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Pselaphinae)
Giulio Cuccodoro, Zi-Wei Yin
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Ogmocerodes navigator sp. n. is described from Cameroon. The habitus and other morphological characters relevant to taxonomy are illustrated with colour photographs. The entire foveal pattern is also shown for the first time in an African Goniacerini.

INTRODUCTION

Goniacerini are rather compact Pselaphinae with conspicuous, geniculate antennae. They occur in the Neotropics and in Africa south of the Sahara, and are usually collected from lowland forest leaf litter, close to or directly from decomposing wood, and several African species in association with ants or termites (Jeannel, 1959; Leleup, 1978). The most notable members of the tribe include the South African termitophile Kistneriella termitobia Leleup, holding the largest individual of the subfamily with a body size of 7.5 mm (Leleup, 1971, 1978), and the Neotropical genus Heptameron Comellini, which is one of the rare pselaphine genera in which the elytra cover the entire abdomen (Comellini, 1979).

The tribe shows an evolutionary trend towards reduction of the number of antenomeres, from eleven to five (Paragoniastes Comellini) in the Neotropics, and from eleven to six (Parasimus Jeannel) in Africa. In both regions the generic concepts of Goniacerini are largely based on this feature, often in combination with the sexually dimorphic antennae, legs, as well as other male features (Comellini, 1979; Jeannel, 1949a, b, 1959; Leleup, 1978, 1982; Raffray, 1882; Schaufuss, 1872), which in our opinion should not be used to define a taxon above the specific level. In fact, the number of antennal segments in Pselaphinae sometimes vary within a genus, as evidenced notably in Goniaceritae within Plagiophorus Motschuslky (Burckhardt & Löbl, 2002), or in other distantly-related groups such as the clavigerine genus Colilodion Besuchet (Löbl, 1998). Taking these facts into consideration, the current generic classification of Goniaerini in the Neo- and Afrotropical regions is believed largely artificial and should be thoroughly revised in the future.

Some hundred individuals of African Goniacerini are represented in scientific collections, placed in fourty-five species spanning sixteen genera, with eleven of them monotypic (Newton & Chandler, 1989). More than half of the known species are placed in the genera Ogmocerodes Jeannel (14 spp.) and Ogmocerus Raffray (12 spp.) – two of the fourteen genera that have eleven-segmented antennae. Separation of these two genera from each other is however based on the presence/absence of the pronotal antebasal suclus, which shows variations in depth and length when present (i.e. in Ogmocerodes), and on the location/presence/absence of the modifications on male legs and antennae.

In this paper we describe a new species of Ogmocerodes from Cameroon, taking the rare opportunity to have eight conspecific individuals at hand to illustrate for the first time the entire foveal pattern of the tribe.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Morphological terminology follows Chandler (2001), except our use of ‘ventrite’ instead of ‘sternite’ when describing meso- and metathoracic structures.

The following abbreviations are applied: AL–length of the abdomen along the midline; AW–maximum width of the abdomen; EL–length of the elytra along the sutural line; EW–maximum width of the elytra; HL–length of the head from the anterior clypeal margin to the occipital constriction; HW–width of the head across eyes; PL–length of the pronotum along the midline; PW–maximum width of the pronotum. Length of the body is a combination of HL + PL + EL + AL.

The material studied was collected under the Research Permit no 0000076/MINRESI/B00/C00/C10/nye of the Ministry of Scientific Research and Innovation of the Republic of Cameroon. It is deposited in the Muséum d'histoire naturelle de la Ville de Genève (MHNG).

TAXONOMY

Ogmocerodes navigator Cuccodoro & Zi-Wei Yin,
sp. n.
Figs 1-4

  • Holotype: Cameroon; ♂, labeled ‘Cameroon, Centre Region, 100 m SW of Ebogo Tourist Center <3°24′00.0″N; 11°28′00.0″E> 04.IX.2014, alt. 650 m, leg. G. Cuccodoro, #8 sifting leaf litter in wooden canoe abandoned in flood forest on the left shore of Nyong River’ (in MHNG; accession number MHNG ENTO 00008839).

  • Paratypes: 5 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀, same label data as the holotype (in MHNG; accession numbers MHNG ENTO 00008840–00008846).

  • Differential diagnosis: Ogmocerodes navigator sp. n. shares markedly punctate pronotal disc with O. raffrayi Brauns, 1915, but the latter species lacks femoral spines in the male. The only other congener to possess metafemoral spines in the male is O. hustaerti Jeannel, 1949b, but it has no mesofemoral spines. The conformation of the antennal modification, and the shape of the aedeagus are also diagnostic.

  • Description: Male (Fig. 1). Length 4.41-4.79 mm. Head longer than wide, HL 1.00-1.09 mm, HW 0.80-0.83 mm, regularly punctate and setose on dorsal surface, with low, short frontal rostrum. Antennal tubercles slightly prominent and close, divided by a short, deep frontal sulcus; lacking frontal fovea, with deep, setose vertexal foveae (Fig. 2A); lacking postantennal notches at lateral margins; small areas just posterior to antennal tubercles glabrous, lacking setae and punctation; antennae (Fig. 4B) with eleven antennomeres, clubs formed by enlarged antennomeres VII-XI; scapes about as long as antennomeres II-VIII combined, distinctly sinuate near base, antennomeres II-VI each transverse, successively larger, antennomeres VII and VIII (Fig. 4C) strongly modified, each greatly enlarged and strongly concave at anteromedial margin of VII and posteromedial margin of VIII, antennomeres IX and X each transverse, narrowed at apex, XI as long as IX and X combined, with truncate base and round apex; reniform eyes each composed of about 200 small facets; ocular-mandibular carinae (Fig. 2B) present; maxillary palpi with palpomere I short, II elongate, narrowed at base and widest at truncate apex, III transversely triangular, IV largest, ovoidal, with small palpal cone at apex; gula (Fig. 2C) considerably depressed posteromedially, indistinct gular sulcus present, each gular fovea has two openings, posterior pair of openings larger than anterior pair.

  • Pronotum (Fig. 2D) about as long as wide, PL 0.85-0.91 mm, PW 0.85-0.90 mm, with slightly constricted base, regularly round margins at middle, apex constricted to form apical collar; deep antebasal sulcus connecting lateral antebasal foveae, sulcus interrupted by short longitudinal basomedian carina, with short, shallow sulcus anterior to carina; punctation and setation of pronotal disc similar to that of head. Prosternite (Fig. 2E) with two pairs of lateral procoxal foveae; lacking paranotal sulci or carinae.

  • Elytra (Fig. 2F) wider than long, EL 1.15-1.29 mm, EW 1.56-1.70 mm, disc more sparsely and finely punctate than pronotum, covered with recumbent setae; each elytron with two large, nude basal foveae; lacking subbasal fovea; sutural stria entire; discal stria extending to apical 4/5 of elytral length; lacking subhumeral foveae and marginal sulci. Mesoventrite (Fig. 3A) with single, large median mesoventral fovea, large lateral mesoventral foveae not forked; lateral mesocoxal foveae deep. Metaventrite (Fig. 3A) with large median fovea slightly forked inwards; with distinct projections (Fig. 4D); posterior margin convex medially.

  • Legs roughly punctate, densely setose; meso- (Fig. 4F) and metafemora (Fig. 4G) each spinose at their ventral margin near apex; third tarsomeres longer than second tarsomeres, protarsomeres II (Fig. 4E) acutely lobed, extending beneath III; with single tarsal claws, and one transparent bristle-like seta.

  • Abdomen (Fig. 3B-D) stout, AL 1.41-1.50 mm, AW 1.57-1.66 mm, coarsely punctate, regularly setose; tergite IV (first visible tergite, Fig. 3C) slightly longer than V, lateral margins sulcate, with broad basal impression, lacking mediobasal foveae, with one large and one tiny pair of basolateral foveae in large sockets at lateral margins of impression, lacking discal carinae; tergite V as long as VI, VII much shorter than previous tergite, tergites V-VII each with basal sulcus and one pair of basolateral foveae, and with sulcate lateral margins, tergite VIII roundly triangular, lacking fovea; paratergites accompanying tergites IV-VII (Fig. 3C). Sternite IV (second visible sternite, Fig. 3D) longest, with wide, densely setose basal sulcus, with three pairs of basolateral foveae, lateral pair smaller than mesal two pairs; sternites V-VII each with setose basal sulcus and two pairs of basolateral foveae, sternite VIII strongly transverse, lacking fovea, with broadly concaved posterior margin, sternite IX membranous, composed of lateral pair of triangular sclerites and one oval, elongate median plate.

  • Aedeagus (Fig. 4H, I) stout, length 0.51 mm, with symmetric median lobe and parameres, with large ovoidal dorsal diaphragm opening; anterior margin of median lobe (Fig. 4J) with membranous, finely setose fringe; parameres (Fig. 4H, I) each with rows of sparse setae from near base to apex, apex (Fig. 4K) with two large setae.

  • Female. Similar to male in general appearance, with simple antennomeres VII-VIII (Fig. 4A), protarsi, and meso- and metafemora, and metaventrite lacking projections; each eye with about 180 facets. Measurements: BL 4.41-4.51 mm, HL 0.96-0.99 mm, HW 0.77-0.78 mm, PL 0.84-0.87 mm, PW 0.84-0.85 mm, EL 1.18-1.23 mm, EW 1.55-1.59 mm, AL 1.40-1.45 mm, AW 1.57-1.64 mm.

  • Habitat: The type series was collected at an elevation of 650 m just before the main rainy season, from sifted leaf litter accumulated in an old wooden canoe abandoned in a flood forest some twenty meters from the waters of the Nyong River (Fig. 5).

  • Distribution: The new species is known only from the type locality in central Cameroon approximately 10 km southeast of the city of Mbalmayo.

  • Etymology: The epithet “navigator” means “sailor” in Latin, remembering that the type series was collected in a canoe.

  • Fig. 1.

    Dorsal habitus of Ogmocerodes navigator sp. n., holotype male. Scale: 1.0 mm.

    f01_415.jpg

    Fig. 2.

    Diagnostic characters of Ogmocerodes navigator sp. n. (A) Head, in dorsal view. (B) Same, in lateral view. (C) Same, in ventral view. (D) Pronotum. (E) Prosternite. (F) Left elytron. Scales: 0.5 mm. Abbreviations: as – antebasal sulcus, bef – basal elytral fovea, ds – discal stria, gf – gular fovea, laf – lateral antebasal fovea, lpcf – lateral procoxal fovea, ls – lateral sulcus, ss – sutural stria, vf – vertexal fovea.

    f02_415.jpg

    Fig. 3.

    Diagnostic characters of Ogmocerodes navigator sp. n. (A) Meso- and metaventrite. (B) Abdomen, in lateral view. (C) Same, in dorsal view. (D) Same, in ventral view. Scales: 0.5 mm. Abbreviations: blf – basolateral foveae, bs – basal sulcus, lmcf – lateral mesocoxal foveae, lmsf – lateral mesoventral foveae, mmsf – median mesoventral foveae, mmtf – median metaventral fovea.

    f03_415.jpg

    Fig. 4.

    Diagnostic characters of Ogmocerodes navigator sp. n. (A. Female. B–K. Male). (A, B) Left antenna. (C) Antennomeres VII-VIII. (D) Metaventral projection. (E) Fore leg. (F) Middle leg. (G) Hind leg. (H) Aedeagus, in dorsal view. (I) Same, in lateral view. (J) Apical portion of aedeagal median lobe, in dorsal view. (K) Apical portion of aedeagal right paramere, in dorsal view. Scales: A-C, E-G = 1.0 mm; D, H, I = 0.2 mm; J = 0.1 mm. K = 0.05 mm.

    f04_415.jpg

    Fig. 5.

    Collecting site (A) and habitat (B) of the type series.

    f05_415.jpg

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    Ivan Löbl (Geneva, Switzerland) and Joseph Parker (New York, U.S.A) critically reviewed the manuscript. The collecting permit was obtained with the assistance Ada Dominica Njom (Yaoundé, Cameroon). The present study was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (No. 31172134), the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (No. 15YF1408700), and a MHNG visiting grant awarded to the second author.

    REFERENCES

    1.

    Brauns H. 1915. Descriptions of some new species of myrme-cophilous beetles from southern Rhodesia, with a description of a new species of Acritus by Dr. H. Bickhardt (Cassel). Proceedings of the Rhodesia Scientific Association (1914) 13: 32–42. Google Scholar

    2.

    Burckhardt D., Löbl I. 2002. Redescription of Plagiophorus paradoxus Motschulsky with comments on the pselaphine tribe Cyarthigerini (Coleoptera: Pselaphinae). Revue suisse de Zoologie 109: 397–406. Google Scholar

    3.

    Chandler D.S. 2001. Biology, morphology, and systematics of the ant-like litter beetle genera of Australia (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Pselaphinae). Memoirs on Entomology, International 15: viii + 1–560. Google Scholar

    4.

    Comellini A. 1979. Notes sur les Psélaphides néotropicaux (Coleoptera). 1, Deux nouveaux genres de la tribu des Goniacerini. Revue suisse de Zoologie 86: 681–689. Google Scholar

    5.

    Jeannel R. 1949a. Psélaphides de la Côte d'Ivoire recueillis par MM R. Paulian et Cl. Delamare-Deboutteville (1945). Revue française d'Entomologie 16: 99–127. Google Scholar

    6.

    Jeannel R. 1949b. Faune du Congo Belge et du Ruanda-Urundi, II.- Pselaphidae. Annales du Musée Royal du Congo Belge, Tervuren (Série 8o: Siences Zoologiques) 2: 1–275. Google Scholar

    7.

    Jeannel R. 1959. Révision des Psélaphides de l'Afrique inter-tropicale. Annales du Musée Royal du Congo Belge, Tervuren (Série 8o: Siences Zoologiques) 75: 1–742. Google Scholar

    8.

    Leleup N. 1971. Contribution à l'étude des Coléoptères Psélaphides de l'Afrique. 9. Batrisini, Goniacerini et Tmesipho-rini termitobies de l'Afrique australe nouveaux ou rarement signalés. Considérations sur l'évolution des Psélaphides symphiles. Bulletin et Annales de la Société Royale d'Ento-mologie de Belgique 107: 149–185. Google Scholar

    9.

    Leleup N. 1978. Contribution à l'étude des Coléoptères Psélaphides de l'Afrique. 26. Révision des Goniacerini de la région éthiopienne. Chapitre 1. Définition de la tribu, description de Basilewskiella jeanneli nov. gen., n.sp., et tableau des genres. Revue de Zoologie Africaine 92: 317–340. Google Scholar

    10.

    Leleup N. 1982. Contribution à l'étude des Coléoptères Psélaphides de l'Afrique. 37. Un nouveau genre de Goniacerini des Monts Usambara. Revue de Zoologie Africaine 96: 200–206. Google Scholar

    11.

    Löbl I. 1998. A new species of Colilodion (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Pselaphinae) from China. Mitteilungen der Schwei-zerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft 71: 467–470. Google Scholar

    12.

    Newton A.F. Jr. , Chandler D.S. 1989. World catalog of the genera of Pselaphidae (Coleoptera). Fieldiana: Zoology (New Series) 53: 1–93. Google Scholar

    13.

    Raffray A. 1882. Psélaphides nouveaux ou peu connus, 1er mémoire. Revue d'Entomologie 1: 1-16, 25-40, 49-4, 73-85, pls 1-2. Google Scholar

    14.

    Schaufuss L.W. 1872. Tabellen-Entwurf zur Bestimmung de Pselaphiden-Gattungen. Nunquam Otiosus 2: 243–248. Google Scholar
    Giulio Cuccodoro and Zi-Wei Yin "A new species of Goniacerini from Cameroon (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Pselaphinae)," Revue suisse de Zoologie 122(2), 415-421, (1 January 2020). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.30011
    Accepted: 6 July 2015; Published: 1 January 2020
    JOURNAL ARTICLE
    7 PAGES


    SHARE
    ARTICLE IMPACT
    Back to Top