Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 January 2020 Apharinodes sinensis sp. n. (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Pselaphinae) from China, and discovery of male wing dimorphism in Hybocephalini
Zi-Wei Yin, Ri-Xin Jiang
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Apharinodes sinensis sp. n. is described from Yunnan, and represents the first named species of the tribe Hybocephalini Raffray from China. Male wing dimorphism is for the first time reported for a hybocephaline. An identification key to the four known Apharinodes species is given.

INTRODUCTION

The ant-loving beetle tribe Hybocephalini Raffray (Pselaphinae: Pselaphitae) comprises some 70 species grouped in 10 genera (Newton & Chandler, 1989; Besuchet 2008). Within this tribe most members are found from the tropical forested areas of Africa and Oriental region (Raffray, 1908; Newton & Chandler, 1989), with two species (of Apharinodes Raffray and Stipesa Sharp, respectively) occurring in eastern Palaearctic region (Sharp, 1874; Nomura, 1989), and one species (of Stipesa) from Australia (Chandler, 2001). Hybocephalines can be distinguished from those of all other tribes of the Pselaphitae by the generally compact and convex habitus, relatively robust antennae, small maxillary palpi, and more noticeably, squamous setae that may partially to entirely cover the body surface (Raffray, 1890a; Chandler, 2001). The number of the antennomeres by which the clubs are formed, relative length(s) of the abdominal segments, presence/absence and number of the abdominal paratergites, and presence/ absence of elytral discal striae are frequently used to determine taxa at generic level (Raffray, 1908; Jeannel 1949a, b, 1959).

The genus Apharinodes Raffray is a small group currently including three species confined to East Asia (Raffray, 1911; Newton & Chandler, 1989; Nomura, 1989). Raffray (1890a) established Apharinodes with A. squamosa Raffray from Singapore (type species subsequently designated by Raffray, 1890b), and later described (Raffray, 1895) a second species A. miranda Raffray from the same country. Most recently, Nomura (1989) described a third species A. papageno Nomura from Okinawa Island, Japan, from where additional collecting data for the same species was later added (Sugaya, 2003). The actual diversity of Apharinodes is expected to be much higher than currently documented. At least eight additional species from China, Malaysia and Thailand were listed in several reports on the local pselaphine fauna of these areas, though none of these has been formally named (Nomura 2000; Nomura & Idris, 2005; Nomura & Mohamed, 2008; Nomura et al., 2008, 2010, 2013). Apharinodes has the antennal clubs composed of only the enlarged terminal antennomere (XI), the first two visible abdominal tergites (morphologically IV and V) are subequal in length, and almost the entire body surface is covered by thickened squamous setae. Such a combination of characters provides reliable means with regard to the identification of Apharinodes within the Hybocephalini.

Based on the third edition of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN, 1985), Nomura (1989) emendated the gender of Apharinodes to masculine, and changed the suffixes of the two known species accordingly. But according to the latest (fourth) edition of the ICZN (1999), the name Apharinodes was originally combined with adjectival species-group names that are feminine (i.e. squamosa and miranda), thus the gender of Apharinodes should be remained as feminine (Article 30.1.4.4.).

Wing dimorphism is long- and well-known in insects. However, for the megadiverse polyphagan family Staphylinidae, sex-related wing dimorphism was only recently documented and discussed in detail. Thayer (1992) firstly reported in Omalium flavidum Hamilton the presence of fully-winged and flightless males and flightless females, which belongs to a less common pattern of wing dimorphism. In Pselaphinae (formerly Pselaphidae, see Newton & Thayer, 1995), such pattern has been so far recorded for Batrisini (Nomura, 1991), Trichonychini (Nomura, 1988; Yin & Li, 2016), Bythinini (Kurbatov, 1994; Löbl et al., 1998), and Tyrini (Nomura, 1997). In these groups, the males with normally developed hind wings tend to have larger eyes, longer elytra and metaventrite, and stronger elytral humeri. Recently, two male specimens of an undescribed Apharinodes were collected from southwestern China (Yunnan) exhibiting male wing dimorphism in a group of the Pselaphinae (Hybocephalini) in which such a phenomenon has never been recorded.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Material studied in this paper is housed in the Insect Collection of Shanghai Normal University (SNUC).

Dissected parts were preserved in Euparal on plastic slides that were placed on the same pin with the specimen. The habitus image was taken using a Canon 5D Mark III camera in conjunction with a Canon MP-E 65 mm f/2.8 1-5X Macro Lens and a Canon MT-24EX Macro Twin Lite Flash. Images of the morphological details were made using a Canon G9 camera mounted on an Olympus CX31 microscope. Zerene Stacker (version 1.04) was used for image stacking. All images were modified and grouped in Adobe Photoshop CS5 Extended.

The label data of the material are quoted verbatim, with additional notes included in parentheses. The following abbreviations are applied: AL–length of the dorsally visible part of the abdomen (posterior to elytra) along the midline; AnL–length of the antenna; AnCL–length of the antennal club; AW–maximum width of the abdomen; EL–length of the elytra along the suture; EW–maximum width of the elytra; HL–length of the head from the anterior clypeal margin to the occipital constriction; HW–width of the head across eyes; PL–length of the pronotum along the midline; PW–maximal width of the pronotum. The length of the body (BL) is a combination of HL + PL + EL + AL. Terminology for morphological structures follows Chandler (2001) with the exception that the term ‘ventrite’ replaces ‘sternite’, except prosternum.

TAXONOMY

Apharinodes sinensis , new species
Figs 12

  • Type material: Holotype: macropterous male: ‘China: Yunnan Province, Lincang City, Yun Hsien (fi01_09.gif), Manwan Town (fi02_09.gif), Caozidicun (fi03_09.giffi04_09.gif), 24°40′27″N, 100°23′09″E, under stone, 1757 m, 9.iv.2016, Zi-Chun Xiong leg.’ (SNUC). Paratype: 1 apterous male, same label data as the holotype (SNUC).

  • Diagnosis: BL 2.28-2.39 mm; postocular region longer than eye (Fig. 2A); anterolateral branches (Fig. 2A-1) of squamous scales on pronotum distinct but shorter than basolateral branches (Fig. 2A-2), basolateral branches and mediobasal branch (Fig. 2A-3) separated anteriorly; male antennomere XI with large, shallow semicircular excavation on mesal surface; aedeagus (Fig. 2G-H) weakly sclerotized, median lobe with large basal capsule, endophallus with three sclerites, parameres thick and short.

  • Description: Macropterous male (Fig. 1A). Body length 2.39 mm. Body light reddish brown, mouthparts and tarsi lighter in color (the light color of the two males available are possibly due to immature adult status); most part of dorsal surface covered with thick squamous setae.

    Head (Fig. 2A) slightly longer than wide, HL 0.53 mm, HW 0.46 mm, small vertexal and frontal fovea largely covered by setae; eyes large, each composed of about 32 facets; postocular margins (Fig. 2B) longer than eyes, roundly narrowed toward head base; antennae (Fig. 2C) robust, scapes as long as combined length of next two antennomeres, antennomeres II transversely quadrate, III to X strongly transverse, successively wider, XI largest, mesal surface with large, shallow, semicircular excavation, AnL 0.95 mm, AnCL 0.33 mm, AnCL/AnL = 0.35; maxillary palpi small and short, three-segmented, with distinct conical palpal cone; gular area flat, densely covered with setae basolaterally.

    Pronotum (Fig. 2A) slightly wider than long, PL 0.48 mm, PW 0.52 mm, lateral margins nearly straight at basal half, narrowed from middle toward apex; anterolateral branches of squamous scales distinct but short, extending less mesally than basolateral branches, mediobasal branch and basolateral branches clearly separated at anterior ends. Whole surface of prosternum (Fig. 2B) covered with dense setae.

    Elytra convex, wider than long, EL 0.73 mm, EW 0.88 mm, posterior margin with band of dense setae; two basal foveae covered by squamous scales; with complete discal and sutural striae. Metathoracic wings fully developed. Mesoventrite densely covered with small squamous setae; metaventrite densely covered with setae at middle, areas posterior to mesocoxae with two elongate projections that extend to metaventral posterior margin.

    Abdomen subglobose, wider than long, AL 0.65 mm, AW 0.86 mm; tergite IV (first visible tergite) as long as tergite V, with pair of lateral sulci, tergites VI and VII slightly shorter than V, VIII (Fig. 2D) circular viewed posteriorly; sternite IV (second visible sternite) to VII successively shorter, VIII (Fig. 2E) shallowly emarginate at middle, IX (Fig. 2F) well-sclerotized at apex, membranous at posterior half.

    Aedeagus (Fig. 2G-H) weakly sclerotized, length 0.38 mm; median lobe broad, with large basal capsule, broadly emarginate along apical margin; parameres short and thick, each with three thick apical setae; endophallus composed of three sclerites, left sclerite longest, curved toward right, middle sclerite shortest, membranous, right sclerite broad, weakly sclerotized, narrowed at apex. Apterous male (Fig. 1B). Similar to macropterous male in general habitat, except eyes smaller, each composed of about 11 facets; elytra and metaventrite shorter; and metathoracic wings absent. Measurements: BL 2.28 mm, HL 0.50 mm, HW 0.44 mm, PL 0.47 mm, PW 0.52 mm, EL 0.65 mm, EW 0.87 mm, AL 0.66 mm, AW 0.85 mm, AnL 0.97 mm, AnCL 0.34 mm, AnCL/AnL = 0.35, length of aedeagus 0.35 mm.

    Female. Unknown.

  • Distribution: Southwestern China: Yunnan.

  • Etymology: The specific epithet indicating the country where the new species was collected.

  • Fig. 1.

    Dorsal habitus of Apharinodes sinensis. (A) Macropterous male. (B) Apterous male. Scale bars: 0.5 mm.

    f01_09.jpg

    Key to species of Apharinodes Raffray

    1 Body less than 2 mm; anterolateral branches of squamous scales on pronotum extending more mesal (closer to midline) than basolateral branches. (Singapore) A. squamosa Raffray

    – Body no less than 2 mm; anterolateral branches of squamous scales on pronotum shorter than basolateral branches (Figs 1, 3) 2

    2 Male antennomere XI with large, shallow, quadrate excavation; pronotal mediobasal and basolateral branches of squamous scales fusing anteriorly (Fig. 3B). (Singapore) A. miranda Raffray

    – Male antennomere XI with deep, rounded excavation (Figs 1, 2C, 3A); pronotal mediobasal and basolateral branches of squamous scales separated anteriorly (Figs 1, 2A, 3A) 3

    3 Excavation of male antennomere XI deeper (Fig. 3A); postocular margins slightly shorter than eye length (Nomura, 1989: fig. 1); pronotal anterolateral branches of squamous scales indistinct (Fig. 3A). (Japan: Okinawa) A. papageno Nomura

    – Excavation of male antennomere XI shallower (Figs 1, 2C); postocular margins longer than eye length (Fig. 2A); pronotal anterolateral branches of squamous scales distinct (Figs 1, 2A). (China: Yunnan) A. sinensis, sp. n.

    Fig. 2.

    Details of male Apharinodes sinensis. (A) Head dorsum and pronotum (numbers indicate branches of squamous scales: 1. anterolateral branch; 2. basolateral branch; 3. mediobasal branch). (B) Head venter and prosternum. (C) Right antenna. (D) Tergite VIII. (E) Sternite VIII. (F) Sternite IX. (G) Aedeagus, in ventral view. (H) Same, in lateral view. Scale bars: A-C = 0.3 mm; D, E, G, H = 0.1 mm; F = 0.05 mm.

    f02_09.jpg

    Fig. 3.

    Dorsal habitus of Apharinodes species. (A) A. papageno, male paratype. (B) A. miranda, male. Scale bars: 0.5 mm.

    f03_09.jpg

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    We thank Zi-Chun Xiong (Lincang, China) for collecting and offering the specimens used in this paper. Habitus pictures of A. papageno and A. miranda were taken during the first author's visit to National Museum of Nature and Science, Tokyo in 2012. The curator of Coleoptera, Shûhei Nomura provided various help and supports. The present study was supported by grants of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31501874) and the Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (No.15YF1408700).

    REFERENCES

    1.

    Besuchet C. 2008. Synonymies et combinaisons nouvelles, revalidations et description de taxa nouveaux de Pselaphinae (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft 81: 61–82. Google Scholar

    2.

    Chandler D.S. 2001. Biology, morphology and systematics of the ant-like litter beetles of Australia (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Pselaphinae). Memoirs on Entomology, International 15: vii + 560 pp. Google Scholar

    3.

    ICZN 1985. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Third Edition. The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature , London. xx + 338 pp. Google Scholar

    4.

    ICZN 1999. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Fourth Edition. The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature , London . xxvii + 306 pp. Google Scholar

    5.

    Jeannel R. 1949a. Les Psélaphides de l'Afrique Orientale (Coleoptera). Mémoires du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (N.S.) 29: 1–226. Google Scholar

    6.

    Jeannel R. 1949b. Faune du Congo Belge et du Ruanda Urundi, II: Pselaphidae. Annales du Musée du Congo Belge, Tervuren (Série 8°: Sciences Zoologiques) 2: 1–275. Google Scholar

    7.

    Jeannel R. 1959. Révision des Psélaphides de l'Afrique intertropicale. Annales du Musée Royal du Congo Belge, Tervuren (Série 8°: Sciences Zoologiques) 75: 1–742. Google Scholar

    8.

    Kurbatov S.A. 1994. Les Bryaxis de l'Extrême-Est de la Russie (Coleoptera, Pselaphidae). Russian Entomological Journal 3: 39–47. Google Scholar

    9.

    Löbl I., Kurbatov S.A., Nomura S. 1998. On the Japanese species of Bryaxis (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Pselaphinae), with notes on allied genera and on endoskeletal polymorphy. Species Diversity 3: 219–269. Google Scholar

    10.

    Newton A.F., Chandler D.S. 1989. World catalog of the genera of Pselaphidae (Coleoptera). Fieldiana: Zoology, (N.S.) 53: iv + 1–93. Google Scholar

    11.

    Newton A.F., Thayer M.K. 1995. Protopselaphinae new subfamily for Protopselaphus new genus from Malaysia, with a phylogenetic analysis and review of the Omaliine Group of Staphylinidae including Pselaphidae (Coleoptera) (pp. 219–320). In : Pakaluk J. & Ślipiński S.A. (eds). Biology, phylogeny, and classification of Coleoptera: Papers celebrating the 80th birthday of Roy A. Crowson. Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii PAN , Warszawa . x + 1092 pp. in 2 vols. Google Scholar

    12.

    Nomura S. 1988. A revision of the subtribe Acetaliina (Coleoptera, Pselaphidae) from Japan, Part I. Kontyû 56: 251–260. Google Scholar

    13.

    Nomura S. 1989. Description of a new species of Apharinodes (Coleoptera, Pselaphidae) from Okinawa Island, Japan. Japanese Journal of Entomology 57: 278–282. Google Scholar

    14.

    Nomura S. 1991. Systematic study on the genus Batrisoplisus and its allied genera from Japan (Coleoptera, Pselaphidae). Esakia 30: 1–462. Google Scholar

    15.

    Nomura S. 1997. Flight of pselaphine beetles - morphological review on flight mechanism of tiny beetles [in Japanese, English title only]. Insekutaryūmu: Ikita Konchū no Zasshi [=Insectarium] 34: 58–66. Google Scholar

    16.

    Nomura S. 2000. A list of the pselaphine and protopselaphine species (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) collected from Yunnan, southwest China in 1992–1998 (pp. 197–238). In : Aoki J.I., Yin W.-Y., Imadaté G. (eds). Taxonomical studies on the soil fauna of Yunnan Province in Southwest China. Tokai University PressGoogle Scholar

    17.

    Nomura S., Idris A.G. 2005. Faunistic notes on the pselaphine species of the supertribes Goniaceritae, Pselaphitae and Clavigeritae from Malaysia and Singapore (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Pselaphinae). Serangga 10: 1–36. Google Scholar

    18.

    Nomura S., Mohamed M. 2008. A faunistic review of the pselaphine species (Insecta, Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) known from Borneo. Memoirs of the National Museum of Nature and Science 45: 13–40. Google Scholar

    19.

    Nomura S., Sakchoowong W., Ogata K., Chanpaisaeng J. 2008. Lists of pselaphine and protopselaphine species (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) collected from Doi Inthanon and Khao Yai National Parks. Report on Insect Inventory Project in Tropical Asia (TAIIV) 2008: 265–294. Google Scholar

    20.

    Nomura S., Sakchoowong W., Chanpaisaeng J. 2010. A list of the pselaphine species (Insecta, Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) collected from the Kaeng Krachan National Park, West Thailand. Bulletin of the National Museum of Nature and Science (A: Zoology) 36: 7–25. Google Scholar

    21.

    Nomura S., Sakchoowong W., Maruyama M. 2013. Further study on the Pselaphine fauna (Insecta, Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) of the Kaeng Krachan National Park, West Thailand in 2010–2012. Bulletin of the National Museum of Nature and Science (A: Zoology) 39: 73–92. Google Scholar

    22.

    Raffray A. 1890a. Etude sur les Psélaphides. V. Tableaux synoptiques.- Notes et synonymie. Revue d'Entomologie 9: 81–172. Google Scholar

    23.

    Raffray A. 1890b. Etude sur les Psélaphides. VI. Diagnoses des espèces nouvelles sur lesquelles sont fondés des genres nouveaux. Revue d'Entomologie 9: 193–219, pls 2–3. Google Scholar

    24.

    Raffray A. 1895. Révision des Psélaphides des Iles de Singapore et de Penang (suite et fin). Revue d'Entomologie 14: 21–82, pl. 2. Google Scholar

    25.

    Raffray A. 1908. Coleoptera. Fam. Pselaphidae (pp. 1–487, 9 pls). In : Wytsman P. (ed.). Genera Insectorum. Fasc. 64. V. Verteneuil & L. Desmet , BruxellesGoogle Scholar

    26.

    Raffray A. 1911. Pselaphidae (pp. 1–222). In : Schenkling S. (ed.). Coleopterorum Catalogus, Pars 27. W. Junk , BerlinGoogle Scholar

    27.

    Sharp D. 1874. The Pselaphidae and Scydmaenidae of Japan. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 1874: 105–130. Google Scholar

    28.

    Sugaya H. 2003. Notes on Apharinodes papageno (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Pselaphinae) in Okinawa-jima, the Ryukyus, Japan. Elytra 31: 125–126. Google Scholar

    29.

    Thayer M.K. 1992. Discovery of sexual wing dimorphism in Staphylinidae (Coleoptera): “Omaliumflavidum, and a discussion of wing dimorphism in insects. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 100: 540–573. Google Scholar

    30.

    Yin Z.-W., Li L.-Z. 2016. A new species of Acetalius Sharp from eastern China (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Pselaphinae). ZooKeys 592: 93–101. Google Scholar
    Zi-Wei Yin and Ri-Xin Jiang "Apharinodes sinensis sp. n. (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Pselaphinae) from China, and discovery of male wing dimorphism in Hybocephalini," Revue suisse de Zoologie 124(1), 9-14, (1 January 2020). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.322660
    Accepted: 29 August 2016; Published: 1 January 2020
    KEYWORDS
    Apharinodes
    Asia
    Hybocephalini
    male wing dimorphism
    new species
    taxonomy
    Back to Top