We describe a new species of the genus Lycodon Boie based on an adult male specimen from Khammouane Province, central Laos. Lycodon banksisp. nov. is distinguished from its congeners by a combination of the following characters: (1) dorsal scales in 17-17-15 rows, dorsal scales on the anterior 2/3 of the body length smooth, the six central dorsal scale rows of the posterior 1/3 of the body length feebly keeled; (2) supralabials 8; (3) infralabials 10; (4) loreal in contact with the eye; (5) cloacal single; (6) ventral scales 241; (7) dorsal surface of body with 87 greyish yellow blotches; (8) ventral surface of body and tail uniformly grey cream. Based on the molecular comparison, Lycodon banksisp. nov. is placed in a clade with other species previously considered to be members of the genus Dinodon. The new species is at least 9% genetically divergent from other species within this clade as shown by a fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome b. This discovery increases the number of Lycodon species known from Laos to eleven.
INTRODUCTION
The genus Lycodon Boie is one of the most diverse genera of colubrid snakes, with 50 currently recognized species (Uetz et al., 2017). The members of this genus have a broad distribution from eastern Iran to southern China and Japan, southward to the Philippines as well as the Indo-Australian Archipelago (Lanza, 1999; Siler et al., 2013; Neang et al., 2014). Six species of Lycodon have been described within the last five years, namely Lycodon synaptor Vogel & David, 2010, L. gongshan Vogel & Luo, 2011, and L. liuchengchaoi Zhang, Jiang, Vogel & Rao, 2011 from China; L. davidi Vogel, Nguyen, Kingsada & Ziegler, 2012 from Laos; L. zoosvictoriae Neang, Hartmann, Hun, Souter & Furey, 2014 from Cambodia; and L. cavernicolus Grismer, Quah, Anuar, Muin, Wood & Nor, 2014 from Malaysia.
From Laos, ten species of Lycodon have been reported to date, comprising L. capucinus (Boie, 1827), L. davidi Vogel, Nguyen, Kingsada & Ziegler, 2012, L. fasciatus (Anderson, 1879), L. futsingensis (Pope, 1928), L. laoensis Günther, 1864, L. meridionalis (Bourret, 1935), L. rufozonatus Cantor, 1842, L. ruhstrati abditus Vogel, David, Pauwels, Sumontha, Norval, Hendrix, Vu & Ziegler, 2009, L. septentrionalis Günther, 1875, and L. subcinctus Boie, 1827 (Deuve, 1970; Vogel et al., 2012; Siler et al., 2013; Luu et al., 2013; Teynié et al., 2014).
Our recent field survey in the karst forest of Phou Hin Poun National Protected Area (NPA), Khammouane Province, central Laos led to the discovery of a snake, which could be identified as a member of the genus Lycodon based on the following characters: eye with a vertically elliptical pupil; nostril enlarged; robustly arched upper maxillary bone with an inward curve in the anterior part; anterior and posterior maxillary teeth interrupted by a diastema; dorsal scales smooth or weakly keeled, in 17 rows anteriorly and at midbody, and 15 rows posteriorly; ventral scales weakly notched (Lanza 1999; Grismer et al., 2014). Although only a single specimen was collected, it proved to be morphologically distinct. Our finding is corroborated by another record, a closely resembling specimen photographed in about 12.4 km distance. The morphological results are further supported by molecular analyses so that we describe the single adult male from Phou Hin Poun, Khammouane Province, central Laos as a new Lycodon species.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Sampling: The field survey was conducted by Vinh Quang Luu and Thomas Calame in Phou Hin Poun NPA, Khammouane Province, central Laos in April 2016. The collected specimen was fixed in approximately 85% ethanol, and subsequently transferred to 70% ethanol for permanent storage. Liver tissue sample was preserved separately in 95% ethanol. The specimen from Phou Hin Poun NPA, central Laos was deposited in the collections of the Vietnam National University of Forestry (VNUF), Hanoi, Vietnam. Another specimen was photographed on 22 July 2016 by an arachnology team led by Peter Jaeger, in ca. 12.4 km distance from the type locality.
Morphological analysis: Measurements were taken following Vogel et al. (2009) with a digital caliper to the nearest 0.1 mm, except body and tail lengths. These measurements included: head length (HL, from snout tip to jaw angles); head width (HW, maximum head width at posterior margin of parietals); head height (HH, vertical height between upper and under sides of head were measured at HW); interorbital distance (IO, the distance between outer edges of supraoculars); eyenostril distance (EN, from anterior edge of the orbit to posterior edge of nostril); internarial distance (IN, horizontal diameter between nostrils); eye diameter (ED, horizontal diameter of the orbit); snout length (SnL, from the tip of rostral to the anterior edge of the orbit); snout-vent length (SVL, from tip of snout to the vent); tail length (TaL); ratio of tail length / total length (TaL/TL); total length (TL).
Scale counts were taken following Vogel et al. (2009). Ventral scales (VEN) were counted according to Dowling (1951); dorsal scale rows (DSR): number of dorsal scale rows at neck (ASR, at one head length behind head), number of dorsal scales at midbody (MSR), and number of dorsal scale rows before the vent (PSR, at one head length before the vent); supralabials (SL, counted on upper lips); infralabials (IL, counted on lower lips); loreals (Lor); loreal scale touching the orbit (yes or no); preoculars (PreOc); postoculars (PosOc); temporals (Temp, counted immediately behind postoculars and between posterior SL and parietals). Bilateral scale counts were given as left/right. Keel (keeled dorsal scale rows); PreVEN (preventral scales); VEN notched (present or absent); VEN keeled (present or absent); SC (subcaudal scales); numbers of pattern-units (like crossbars or vertebral blotches) are provided as number on body + number on tail.
For comparisons, we referred to the data provided by Boulenger (1893), Smith (1943), Orlov & Ryabov (2004), Neang et al. (2014), and Grismer et al. (2014); studied specimens are listed in the Appendix.
Museum abbreviations are as follows: CAS-California Academy of Sciences; GP-Specimens in the collection of Peng Guo; LSUMZ-The Louisiana State University Museum of Natural Science; MNHN-Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France; VNUF-Vietnam National University of Forestry.
Molecular data and phylogenetic analyses: The mitochondrial cytochrome b gene was employed in this study, because it has been widely used in previous molecular analyses of Lycodon (e.g., Guo et al., 2013, Siler et al., 2013). We included six new sequences from samples collected in Laos and Vietnam (Table 1). Other sequences of related species were obtained from GenBank. Three species, Ahaetulla prasina, Boiga cynodon, and Dispholidus typus, were assigned as outgroups based on their phylogenetic relationships to the genus Lycodon (Guo et al., 2013, Siler et al., 2013) (Table 1).
We used the protocols of Le et al. (2006) for DNA extraction, amplification, and sequencing. A fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome b was amplified using the primer pair L14910/H16064 (Burbrink et al., 2000). After sequences were aligned by Clustal X v2 (Thompson et al., 1997), data were analyzed using maximum parsimony (MP) and maximum likelihood (ML) as implemented in PAUP*4.0b10 (Swofford, 2001) and Bayesian analysis (BA) as implemented in MrBayes v3.2 (Ronquist et al., 2012). Settings for these analyses followed Le et al. (2006), except that the number of generations in the Bayesian analysis was increased to 1´107 and the number of bootstrap replicates in ML to 1000. The optimal model for nucleotide evolution was set to TrN+I+G for ML and combined Bayesian analyses as selected by Modeltest v3.7 (Posada & Crandall, 1998). The cutoff point for the burn-in function was set to 19 in the Bayesian analysis, as -lnL scores reached stationarity after 19,000 generations in both runs. Nodal support was evaluated using Bootstrap replication (BP) as estimated in PAUP and posterior probability (PP) in MrBayes v3.2. BP ≥⃒ 70% and PP ≥⃒ 95% are regarded as strong support for a clade. Uncorrected pairwise divergences were calculated in PAUP*4.0b10 (Table 2).
Table 1.
Lycodon samples used in the molecular analyses (for abbreviations see Material and methods); * = listed as L. aulicus in Siler et al. (2013); ** = listed as L. fasciatus in genbank but as L. cf. fasciatus in the CAS catalogue.

Table 2.
Uncorrected (“p”) distance matrix showing percentage pairwise genetic divergence (cytochrome b) between new and closely related species.

RESULTS
Molecular data, Phylogenetic analysis: The final matrix consisted of 1100 aligned characters, of which 440 were parsimony informative. The alignment did not contain gaps. Maximum parsimony analysis of the dataset recovered two most parsimonious trees with 1649 steps (CI = 0.46; RI = 0.65). In the ML analysis, the score of the single best tree found was 8329.12 after 2678 arrangements were tried. The topology derived from the Bayesian analysis (Fig. 1) was similar to that in Guo et al. (2013), but nodes of the phylogeny received lower statistical support. The new species was recovered in a clade together with other species, which were previously placed in the genus Dinodon (see Siler et al., 2013; Guo et al., 2013). This clade was strongly supported by both MP and Bayesian analyses (BP = 86%, PP = 97%) (Fig. 1). The new species is most closely related to a clade containing ‘L. flavozonatus’, L. futsingensis, L. meridionalis in terms of genetic distance based on cytochrome b, and is diverged at least about 9.0–9.2% from the latter species (Table 2).
TAXONOMIC ACCOUNT
Lycodon banksi sp. nov.
Figs 2–5, Table 3
Holotype: VNUF R.2015.20 (field number: TK 20.15), adult male, collected on 4 April 2015 by Vinh Quang Luu and Thomas Calame in the karst forest, at the mouth of a cave, Phou Hin Poun NPA, Hinboun District, Khammouane Province, central Laos, at an elevation of 167 m a.s.l.
Diagnosis: Lycodon banksi sp. nov is characterized by the following morphological characters: (1) dorsal scales in 17-17-15 rows, dorsal scales on the anterior 2/3 of the body length smooth, the six central dorsal scale rows of the posterior 1/3 of the body length feebly keeled; (2) supralabials 8; (3) infralabials 10; (4) loreal entering orbit; (5) cloacal single; (6) ventral scales 241; (7) dorsal surface of body with 87 greyish yellow blotches; (8) ventral surface of body and tail uniformly grey cream.
Description of the holotype: Head elongate (HL 15.3 mm), moderately distinct from the neck, longer than wide (HW/HL ratio 0.71), depressed (HH/HL ratio 0.40), narrow anteriorly (IN/IO ratio 0.65); snout elongate (SnL/HL ratio 0.39); nostril lateral, oval shaped, located in the middle of the nasal; eye large (ED/HL ratio 0.17), pupils vertically elliptic; rostral triangular, much broader than high, hardly visible from above; nasal divided into two scales by a vertical ridge along posterior edge of nostril; two square internasals, as wide as long, bordered by two large, subpentagonal prefrontals posteriorly; frontal single, enlarged, pentagonal, narrowed posteriorly; parietals longer than wide, in contact with each other medially, with upper anterior and posterior temporals, paraparietal laterally and four nuchal scales posteriorly; loreal 1/1, elongate, entering orbit; supralabials 8/8, first and second in contact with nasal, third to fifth entering orbit, sixth largest; infralabials 10/10, first pair in broad contact with each other, first to fifth in contact with first pair of chin shields; first and second pairs of chin shields elongate, of the same size and shape, separated by a medial groove, first pair larger than the second; preocular 1/1; postoculars 2/2, of the same size, bordering anterior temporals; anterior temporals 2/2, posterior temporals 3/3, upper ones smaller than lower ones.
Body elongate, SVL 415 mm; TaL >50 mm (tail tip lost); preventrals 2, ventrals 241; subcaudals 26 (tail tip lost), divided, weakly notched laterally; cloacal single; DSR 17-17-15; dorsal scales on the anterior 2/3 of the body length smooth, the six central dorsal scale rows of the posterior 1/3 of the body length feebly keeled; the vertebral scales not enlarged.
Colouration in life: Head dark grey, without vertical light nuchal band; dorsal surface of body dark greyyellow with 87 greyish yellow irregular dorsal blotches; first body blotch starting at ventral scale 13, a half vertebral scale covered by this blotch; two yellow stripes on each side, from behind the neck to vent, indistinct posteriorly; ventral scales grey cream; dorsal surface of tail with at least eleven greyish yellow tail blotches, ventral surface of tail grey cream.
Hemipenis: The left hemipenis is only in part everted but shows a spinose ornamentation.
Additional specimen: One specimen which was not collected but detected and photographed on 22 July 2016 by an arachnology team consisting of Peter Jaeger, Aloke Sahu and Jonas Ewert, in Khammouane Province, in ca. 12.4 km distance from the type locality. The color pattern of this specimen resembles closely that of the holotype.
Comparisons: In our phylogenetic analysis, Lyco don banksi sp. nov. is nested in a clade containing L. rufozonatus, L. semicarinatus (Cope), ‘L. flavozonatus’, L. futsingensis and L. meridionalis. The new species differs from the similar L. meridionalis by having loreal entering the orbit (versus separated from the orbit), dorsal scales on the anterior 2/3 of the body length smooth, the six central dorsal scale rows on the posterior body third feebly keeled (versus distinctly keeled), dorsal head pattern uniform dark grey (versus with yellow-black marbling in L. meridionalis), and ventral surface grey cream (versus yellow with dark spots posteriorly) (see Bourret, 1935; Orlov & Ryabov, 2004); from L. rufozonatus by having loreal entering the orbit (versus usually separated), a distinctly higher ventral scale count (241 versus 185–204), dorsal scales feebly keeled in the posterior body part (versus all smooth), dorsal head pattern uniform dark grey (versus dark brown with yellow borders), and body pattern blotched (versus banded) (Boulenger 1893); from L. semicarinatus by having loreal touching the orbit (versus separated), a higher ventral scale count (241 versus 211–234), dorsal scale rows keeled along posterior 1/3 (versus keeled along anterior half), belly pattern uniform grey cream (versus yellow), and body pattern blotched (versus banded) (Boulenger 1893); from L. flavozonatus by having loreal in contact with the orbit (versus separated), cloacal single (versus divided), six dorsal scale rows on the posterior third of the body feebly keeled (versus 10–12 keeled dorsal scale rows at midbody), dorsal head dark grey (versus black with light markings), and belly pattern uniform grey cream (versus yellow with large black spots); from L. futsingensis by having loreal entering the orbit (versus separated), a higher ventral scale count (241 versus 193–203 in males), dorsal scales feebly keeled in the posterior body part (versus all smooth), and body pattern blotched (versus banded) (Vogel et al., 2012; Neang et al., 2014) (Table 4).
The new species has a loreal entering the orbit and thus differs from the following species and subspecies of the Lycodon ruhstrati group which have the loreal separated from the orbit: L. cardamomensis Daltry & Wüster, 2002, L. davidi, L. multifasciatus (Maki, 1931), L. ophiophagus Vogel, David, Pauwels, Sumontha, Norval, Hendrix, Vu & Ziegler, 2009, L. paucifasciatus Rendahl in Smith, 1943, L. ruhstrati ruhstrati (Fischer, 1886), and Lycodon ruhstrati abditus (Vogel et al., 2009). In addition, the new species differs from L. cardamomensis by having more ventral scales (241 versus 215), and in body pattern (87 blotches versus 12 bands); from L. davidi by having more ventral scales (241 versus 224), six dorsal scale rows on the posterior third of the body feebly keeled (versus dorsal scale rows at midbody slightly keeled, outermost rows entirely smooth throughout body), and belly pattern uniform grey cream (versus anterior third whitishcream, posterior part heavily speckled with dark dots); from L. multifasciatus by having more ventral scales (241 versus maximum 237), and dorsal pattern blotched (versus banded); from L. ophiophagus by having more ventral scales (241 versus 211), and dorsal pattern (87 blotches versus 21–22 bands); from L. paucifasciatus by having fewer dorsal scale rows at neck (17 versus 19), more ventral scale rows (241 versus 221–222), six dorsal scale rows on the posterior third of the body feebly keeled (versus two upper rows plus vertebral row distinctly keeled), and dorsal pattern blotched (versus banded) (Neang et al., 2014); from L. r. ruhstrati and Lycodon ruhstrati abditus by having more ventral scales (241 versus 211–228; 241 versus 206–224, respectively), and dorsal pattern blotched (versus banded in the latter) (Vogel et al., 2012); from L. synaptor by having much more ventral scale rows (241 versus 201–203), dorsal pattern with 87 blotches (versus 30–31 bands), and belly pattern uniform grey cream (versus banded) (Vogel & David 2010); from L. zoosvictoriae by having more ventral scales (241 versus 213), dorsal pattern consisting of 87 blotches (versus 31), and having six dorsal scale rows on the posterior third of the body feebly keeled (versus all weakly keeled) (Neang et al., 2014).
From the remaining species occurring in Laos, the new species can be distinguished as follows: from L. capucinus by having more ventrals (241 versus 182–211), fewer supralabials (8/8 versus 9–10), cloacal single (versus divided), dorsal blotches 87 (versus reticulated), and greyish yellow blotched body pattern (versus reticulated); from L. fasciatus by having more ventral scale rows (241 versus 182–225), dorsal pattern consisting of 87 blotches (versus 19–49 bands), and belly pattern uniform grey cream (versus white with dark blotches) (Neang et al., 2014); from L. laoensis by having loreal in contact with the orbit (versus separated), more ventrals (241 versus 169–192), and dorsal scales feebly keeled in the posterior body part (versus all smooth) (Neang et al., 2014); from L. septentrionalis by having more infralabials (10 versus 7–8), more ventral scales (241 versus 202–217), and dorsal pattern blotched (versus banded), as well as belly pattern uniform grey cream (versus white) (Neang et al., 2014); from L. subcinctus by the presence of preocular scale (versus absent), having cloacal scale single (versus divided), dorsal pattern blotched (versus banded in anterior part), and more ventral scale rows (241 versus 129–230) (Neang et al., 2014).
From the remaining species in the fasciatus group, the new species differs as follows: from L. butleri Boulenger by having more ventral scale rows (241 versus 220–227), dorsal pattern blotched (versus banded), and belly pattern uniform grey cream (versus banded & spotted) (Grismer et al., 2014); from L. cavernicolus by having dorsal head uniformly dark grey (versus light brown), fewer supralabials (8 versus 9 or 10), more dorsal blotches (87 versus 36–45 bands), dorsal scales on the anterior 2/3 of the body length smooth, the six central dorsal scale rows of the posterior 1/3 of the body length feebly keeled (versus all keeled), and greyish yellow blotched pattern on the body (versus white bands); from L. gongshan by having six dorsal scale rows on the posterior third of the body feebly keeled (versus upper and vertebral dorsal rows keeled), more ventral scale rows (241 versus 210–216), and dorsal pattern with 87 blotches (versus 32–40 bands) (Vogel & Luo, 2011); from L. liuchengchaoi by having cloacal scale single (versus divided), dorsal pattern consisting of 87 irregular greyish yellow dorsal blotches (versus 40 well-defined yellow rings), and more ventral scales (241 versus 204) (Zhang et al., 2011).
Distribution: Lycodon banksi sp. nov. is currently known only from the type locality in the Phou Hin Poun NPA, Khammouane Province, central Laos (Fig. 6).
Etymology: The name of the species is dedicated to our friend and colleague Chris Banks, International Coordinator, Philippine Crocodile National Recovery Team, Zoos Victoria, Australia, for his outstanding contributions towards amphibian and reptile conservation, in particular of the Philippine Crocodile. We propose the following common names: Banks' Wolf Snake (English), Banks Wolfszahnnatter (German).
Natural history: The holotype was found at 20:39 h, crawling on a limestone outcrop in the karst forest, approximately 0.3 m above the forest floor, at an elevation of 167 m a.s.l. The humidity at the time of collection was approximately 85% and the air temperature ranged from 23 to 26oC (Fig. 7). Another specimen was observed 12.4 km away from the type locality, active on the ground at 23:30 h, near a limestone cliff in the secondary forest.
Fig. 1.
Bayesian cladogram based on the partial cytochrome b gene. Numbers above and below branches are bootstrap values of MP/ ML analyses (>50%) and Bayesian posterior probabilities, respectively. Asterisk denotes 100% value.

Table 3.
Measurements (in mm) and morphological characters of the holotype of Lycodon banksi sp. nov. (measurements in mm; for other abbreviations see material and methods; * tail tip lost).

Fig. 2.
Adult male holotype of Lycodon banksi sp. nov. (VNUF R.2015.20) in life. (A) dorsolateral view. (B) Head in dorsolateral view. (C) Head in dorsal view. Photos: V. Q. Luu.

Fig. 3.
Different head views of the adult male holotype of Lycodon banksi sp. nov. (VNUF R.2015.20). Photos V. Q. Luu.

DISCUSSION
In our phylogenetic analyses, Lycodon banksi is placed in a clade with other species previously considered to be members of the genus Dinodon. In addition, the specimen of L. meridionalis from Bac Kan Province, Vietnam was nested in the same clade with ‘L. flavozonatus’ from Guangdong and Guangxi provinces in southern China. The genetic distance between the Vietnamese and Chinese samples is approximately 1.4–2.4% (2.6% between two Chinese samples). Morphological features of the specimens from Bac Kan, Ninh Binh, and Thanh Hoa provinces were consistent with those in the descriptions of L. meridionalis by Bourret (1935) and Orlov & Ryabov (2004) in the following characters: snout-vent length in males reaching 1295 mm; dorsal head with yellow-black marble markings; transverse bands on body 86–115; ventral scales 234–245; cloacal plate single; belly pattern uniform yellow with dark spots posteriorly (Table 4). Therefore, based on the molecular data, we herein initially assign two specimens (‘L. flavozonatus’ GP 1939, 2279) from China to L. meridionalis, although this placement needs to be confirmed by further morphological studies. Superficially, the new species is similar to L meridionalis in dorsal pattern. However, they are clearly distinguishable in other morphological features, e.g., dorsal scalation, dorsal head, and belly patterns. Although the new species has no clear sister species according to the phylogenetic analyses, it is most closely related to L. meridionalis in terms of genetic distance, but distinctly differing from the latter (ca. 9%).
Fig. 6.
Map showing the type locality of Lycodon banksi sp. nov. in Khammouane Province (black dots) and other records of the genus Lycodon occurring in Laos (after Deuve, 1970; Vogel et al., 2012; Siler et al., 2013; Luu et al., 2013; Teynié et al., 2014).

The new species seems to be a nocturnal and terrestrial snake, and rare. It is a karst-dweller in the northern Truong Son Range, as are L. davidi and L. ruhstrati abditus (Vogel et al., 2012; Luu et al., 2013). L. banksi has a unique pattern of dark grey and yellow colouration on its dorsal surface, which offers a perfect camouflage among litter on the forest ground and on karst surface. Moreover, the species has indistinct banding on the dorsal surface in comparison with its congeners of the L. ruhstrati and L. fasciatus groups which are clearly banded.
The discovery of this new species increases the number of Lycodon species known from Laos to eleven. In the same area, we recently discovered two new bent-toed geckos (Cyrtodactylus jaegeri Luu, Calame, Bonkowski, Nguyen & Ziegler, C. soudthichaki Luu, Calame, Nguyen, Bonkowski & Ziegler) and two new species of the genus Gekko (G. thakhekensis Luu, Calame, Nguyen, Le, Bonkowski & Ziegler, G. bonkowskii Luu, Calame, Nguyen, Le, Bonkowski & Ziegler) (Luu et al., 2014a, b, 2015a, b). These recent discoveries together with the new Lycodon species provide strong evidence that the northern Truong Son Range, and especially the extensive limestone karst formations in Khammouane Province, central Laos represent a hotspot of endemic biodiversity. The finding of this new Lycodon species with its unique colour pattern and morphology suggests that the species diversity within the genus Lycodon might be far greater than commonly assumed. Our study further underlines the need to combine detailed morphological and molecular data to delineate species complexes and better understand kinship. Unfortunately, it was not possible to obtain molecular data from all investigated reference species (e.g., Lycodon fasciatus MNHN 1928.69 from Xieng Khoang Province, northern Laos) due to formalinfixed state and long-term storage. Therefore, further field studies are needed to accurately assess the diversity of Lycodon in the poorly studied karst forest systems of central Laos.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are grateful to S. Wayakone, S. Bounphanmy, H. Chanthavong, K. Phanvilay (NUOL, Vientiane) for supporting our field research in Laos. Collected specimens were exported under the Permit 073/15 signed by the CITES Management Authority of Lao PDR. V. Q. Luu thanks C. V. Pham, N. T. Nguyen, K. V. Phung and D. T. Bui (VNUF, Hanoi) for supporting his work. We thank S. Sengchanthavong, S. Soudthichack, and T. Homsaysombath (Khammouane) for supporting our field research in Laos. We thank D.V. Tran (VNUF) for providing the map, P. Jaeger, A. Sahu, and J. Ewert for providing data and photographs of another specimen, and H. T. Ngo for laboratory assistance. We thank two anonymous reviewers for providing helpful comments on the manuscript. We thank A. Ohler (MNHN, Paris) for the loan of Lycodon specimens deposited in her collection. Specimen examination at the MNHN, Paris, by V. Q. Luu was supported by Synthesys. Field work in Laos was funded by Cologne Zoo (Germany), Rufford Foundation (England), and Idea Wild (United States). For collecting comparative material, field work in Vietnam is funded by the National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED, Grant No. 106.06–2017.18). This research was partially funded by the Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (ODA Project: Capacity strengthening in scientific research and technology development for the Lao National Academy of Science, Nr. 7450905). M. D. Le was supported by the Partnerships for Enhanced Engagement in Research (PEER) (USAID-PEER-3-149).
Table 4.
Diagnostic characters separating Lycodon banksi sp. nov. from closely related species and the remaining Lycodon species recorded from Laos (data obtained from Boulenger, 1893; Smith, 1943; Taylor, 1965; Deuve, 1970; Orlov & Ryabov, 2004; Vogel et al., 2009, 2012; Siler et al., 2013; Luu et al., 2013; Teynié et al., 2014; Neang et al., 2014).

REFERENCES
Appendices
Appendix: Comparative specimens examined
Lycodon capucinus. Laos: Bolikhamxay Province: Tad Leuk: VNUF R.2015.15 (field number: PKK06.15).
Lycodon davidi. Laos: Vientiane Province: Vang Vieng: IEBR A.2011.7 (field number: NQT 2010.39).
Lycodon fasciatus. Laos: Xieng Khoang Province: MNHN1928.69
Lycodon fasciatus. China: Yannan Province: MNHN1919.148
Lycodon fasciatus. China: Tibet: MNHN1912.465
Lycodon fasciatus. China: Tibet: MNHN1912.466
Lycodon fasciatus. India: MNHN1912.47
Lycodon futsingensis. Laos: Khammouane Province: VFU A.2013.4
Lycodon futsingensis. Vietnam: Bac Giang Province: IEBR A.0822
Lycodon futsingensis. Vietnam: Ha Tinh Province: ZFMK 81474
Lycodon futsingensis. Vietnam: Lam Dong Province: IEBR A.0704
Lycodon futsingensis. Vietnam: Quang Binh Province: ZFMK 86453
Lycodon meridionalis. Vietnam: Bac Kan Province: Ba Be National Park: VNUF R.2012.4 (field number: BBR4). Ninh Binh Province: Trang An: VNUF R.2017.54 (field number: TA 17.54). VNUF R.2017.88 (field number: TA 17.88). VNUF R.2017.126 (field number: ND 17.126). Thanh Hoa Province: Nam Dong: VNUF R.2017.123 (field number: ND 17.123).
Lycodon paucifasciatus. Vietnam: Quang Binh Province: ZFMK 80662
Lycodon paucifasciatus. Vietnam: Quang Binh Province: ZFMK 86452
Lycodon ruhstrati abditus. Laos: Khammouane Province: VFU A.2013.5
Lycodon ruhstrati abditus. Vietnam: Quang Binh Province: ZFMK 86451