Translator Disclaimer
11 February 2016 Cayratia cheniana (Vitaceae): An Endangered New Species Endemic to the Limestone Mountains of Ninh Thuan Province, Vietnam
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Considerable numbers of species have become extinct before being scientifically described, and the loss of natural habitats is known to be one of the major reasons for biodiversity declines. In this study, an endangered new species, Cayratia cheniana L. M. Lu & J. Wen, endemic to the limestone mountains of Ninh Thuan province of Vietnam is herein described based on both morphological and molecular evidence. With five chloroplast markers, Cayratia cheniana is placed as the first diverged lineage of Cayratia Juss. Morphologically, Cayratia cheniana shares synapomorphies with all other Cayratia s. s. in possessing a membrane enclosing ventral infolds in the seeds and presence of bracts on the lower part of the inflorescence axis. This species can be readily distinguished from other congeners by its tripalmate-trifoliate to bipinnate leaf architecture and stems with shredding bark.

Understanding the diversity of life on the planet has been one of the major interests of naturalists since the 1700s (Lomolino et al. 2010; Wen et al. 2013b). Many new life forms continue to be discovered and described (SA2000 1994; Wen et al. 2015a). However, global ecosystems have been substantially disturbed due to impacts of human activities in recent decades. Considerable numbers of species have become extinct or endangered before being described (Wilson 1992; Liu et al. 2013). Loss of natural habitats is one of the major reasons attributed to a decline in biodiversity. Cayratia Juss. (Vitaceae) occurs in various habitats including tropical rainforests, temperate deciduous forests, limestone areas, and savannas. Species restricted to limestone or savannah areas are extremely sensitive to environmental changes and are more susceptible to habitat destruction. Here we describe an endangered new species of Cayratia endemic to the limestone mountains of Ninh Thuan province, Vietnam based on both morphological and molecular evidence.

The genus Cayratia in the traditional sense consists of approximately 60 species, which are widely distributed in the Old World tropics (Galet 1967; Wen 2007). Species of Cayratia are usually herbaceous or woody climbers that are hermaphroditic to andromonoecious and sometimes with tuberous underground systems. They possess 4-merous flowers, and axillary, pseudo-axillary or leaf-opposed inflorescences. The generic name Cayratia was established by Jussieu (1818) and conserved in favor of an earlier name, Columella Lour. (Loureiro 1790). Planchon (1887) later treated Cayratia as a section of Cissus L., i.e. Cissus sect. Cayratia (Juss.) Planch. However, Gagnepain (1911) argued for restoring its generic rank based on its compound leaves (vs. mostly simple leaves in Cissus), axillary or pseudo-terminal inflorescences (vs. leaf-opposed in Cissus), relatively thinner floral disk (vs. much thicker in Cissus), and two to four seeds per fruit (vs. 1-seeded fruits in Cissus). Columella was sometimes adopted as the generic name for taxa of Cayratia because of the former's nomenclatural priority over Cayratia (e.g. in Merrill 1916). Cayratia was conserved as the generic name at the Cambridge International Botanical Congress in 1930 (Merrill 1935). Süssenguth (1953) classified Cayratia into two sections: sect. Koilosperma Suess. and sect. Discypharia Suess., which was followed by Latiff (1981). Li (1998) divided the Chinese Cayratia into two subgenera: subg. Cayratia and subg. Discypharia (Suess.) C. L. Li based on seed morphology and inflorescence structure.

Generic circumscription and concepts of character evolution in Vitaceae have changed substantially with recent progress in understanding the molecular phylogenetics and character analyses of the family in a phylogenetic framework (Jackes and Rossetto 2006; Wen et al. 2013a, 2013c, 2014, 2015b; Ickert-Bond et al. 2015; Zhang et al. 2015). Previous phylogenetic studies of Vitaceae revealed that Cayratia was not monophyletic and that at least some members have a close relationship with Cyphostemma (Planch.) Alston and Tetrastigma (Miq.) Planch. (Soejima and Wen 2006; Rossetto et al. 2007; Wen et al. 2007; Chen et al. 2011; Ren et al. 2011; Trias-Blasi et al. 2012). With the expanded taxon sampling of Cayratia and its allied genera, Lu et al. (2013) resolved Cayratia into three lineages (the African clade of Cayratia, subg. Cayratia, and subg. Discypharia) and recommended splitting Cayratia s. l. into three genera. Recently, Wen et al. (2013a) treated taxa in Cayratia subg. Discypharia (seeds without a membrane covering the ventral infolds) as members of a segregate genus, Causonis Raf., and made two new combinations of the genus distributed in the Philippines: Causonis corniculata (Benth.) J. Wen & L. M. Lu and C. pterita (Merr.) J. Wen & L. M. Lu. At the recent Botany 2015 meetings held in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, Wen et al. (2015b) proposed a revised classification of Vitaceae splitting the traditional concept of Cayratia s. l. into three genera: the new genus consisting of the African species of Cayratia, the resurrected Causonis Raf. and Cayratia s. s. (also see Moore and Wen, in press).

The new species described here is endemic to the limestone mountains of Ninh Thuan province of Vietnam, and possesses leaf-opposed tendrils, axillary inflorescences, 4-merous flowers with well-developed disks, and undivided stigmas. Furthermore, this species has seeds with a membrane enclosing the ventral infolds and has bracts on the lower part of the inflorescence axis. These characteristics firmly place the new species in Cayratia s. s. following the recently reduced circumscription of the genus (Wen et al. 2013a, 2015b; Moore and Wen, in press).

Materials And Methods

Morphological Observation—Specimens of Cayratia from several major herbaria in China (KUN, PE) and abroad (E, HN, K, MO, P, and US) were examined. Terminology used to describe the unusual leaf division in this species follows Jiménez-Saa (2011). Seed morphology was observed and photographed with a stereomicroscope (a Nikon SMZ1000 with a Nikon DXM 1200F digital camera) in the State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Phylogenetic Analyses—Five new sequences (atpB-rbcL: KU167491, rps16: KU167492, trnC-petN: KU167493, trnH-psbA: KU167494, and trnL-F: KU167495) were generated and the phylogenetic position of the new species was examined in a global sampling scheme from Lu et al. (2013). Sequence assemblage and alignment followed the protocols described in Lu et al. (2013).

The combined chloroplast markers were analyzed with the maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) methods. The ML analyses were conducted in RAxML 8.1.11 (Stamatakis 2006) and GARLI 2.1 (Zwickl 2006), applying 1,000 bootstrap replicates with the substitution model selected in MrModeltest 2.3 (Nylander 2004). A partitioned Bayesian analysis was conducted in MrBayes 3.2.6 (Ronquist et al. 2012) as implemented on the CIPRES Science Gateway Portal (Miller et al. 2010). Parameter configuration and convergence estimation followed Lu et al. (2013).

Fig. 1.

Cayratia cheniana L. M. Lu & J. Wen. A. Flowering branch. B. Flower. C. Fruit (drawn by Ai-Li Li; Based on Z. D. Chen, J. B. Zhang & L. M. Lu 565, PE).

f01_00.jpg

Fig. 2.

Cayratia cheniana L. M. Lu & J. Wen. A. Limestone habitat. B. Leaves and stem. C. Bifid tendril. D. Inflorescence. E. Presence of bracts on inflorescence axis. F. Fruit. G. Flower. H-J. Dorsal (H) and ventral (I) views and transverse section (J) of seed.

f02_00.jpg

Fig. 3.

Maximum likelihood tree for Vitaceae based on the combined chloroplast data sets (atpB-rbcL, rps16, trnC-petN, trnH-psbA and trnL-F). A phylogram overview is shown in the upper left-hand corner. Three major clades of Cayratia s. l. in the traditional sense are colored with blue (Causonis), green (Cayratia s. s.), and red (the African Cayratia), respectively. The newly described species Cayratia cheniana is highlighted in yellow. Bootstrap values (RAxML and GARLI) and Bayesian posterior probability values of major clades and key nodes are indicated above branches. Dorsal, ventral views and transverse sections of seeds of Causonis (A–C), Cayratia s. s. (D–F), and the African Cayratia (G–I) are provided in the bottom left-hand corner.

f03_00.jpg

Results

Phylogenetic Position—The new species was identified as a Cayratia in the field based on its leaf-opposed tendrils, axillary inflorescences, 4-merous flowers, and undivided stigmas (Fig. 1). In addition, the species has a pair of bracts on the lower part of the inflorescence axis (indicated by arrows in Fig. 2E) and seeds with a membrane enclosing the ventral infolds (Fig. 2I). These characteristics supported it as a member of the newly circumscribed genus Cayratia s. s. Based on molecular data, both the ML and BI analyses generated congruent topology and the ML tree with bootstrap and Bayesian posterior probability values is shown in Fig. 3. Similar to our previous analyses, Cayratia s. l. was not monophyletic but three well-supported clades were detected: the African Cayratia, subg. Cayratia, and subg. Discypharia, corresponding to the three genera proposed by Wen et al. (2015b). The new species, Cayratia cheniana, is resolved as sister to the clade of the remaining species of Cayratia s. s. (RAxML BS = 76%, GARLI BS = 73%, PP = 0.99). Leaf architecture has been highlighted in traditional infrageneric classifications of Vitaceae (Li 1998; Chen et al. 2007). Cayratia s. l. in the traditional sense has trifoliate, digitate, and pedate leaf architecture throughout its distribution range. However, species with pinnate leaves are restricted to Madagascar, which were recognized as belonging to a distinct clade of the newly proposed segregate genus (Lu et al. 2013; Wen et al. 2015b). The new species, endemic to the limestone mountains of Vietnam, has a tripalmate-trifoliate to bipinnate leaf architecture. As the first diverged lineage of Cayratia s. s., the new species plays an important role in understanding the morphological evolution and biogeographic dispersal of Cayratia s. 1.

Fig. 4.

Distribution of Cayratia cheniana L. M. Lu & J. Wen in Vietnam, indicated by a black asterisk.

f04_00.jpg

Taxonomic Treatment

  • Cayratia cheniana L. M. Lu & J. Wen, sp. nov.—TYPE: VIETNAM. Ninh Thuan province: Cana, limestone mountains, alt. 120 m, 11°20′27.74″N, 108°52′20.97″E, 18 Aug 2013, Z. D. Chen, J. B. Zhang & L. M. Lu 565 (holotype: PE!; isotypes: PE!, US!).

  • The new species differs from other known Cayratia in its tripalmate-trifoliate to bipinnate leaf architecture and old stems with shredding bark.

  • Lianas, woody. Branchlets terete; stems green with dense hairs when young, later turning to brownish or gray-brownish, with conspicuous lenticels, bark eventually shredding. Tendrils leaf-opposed, bifurcate and lacking adhesive discs. Leaves mostly tripalmate-trifoliolate, sometimes bipinnate; petiole 5–8 cm; central petiolule 0.5–1 cm, pilose, petiolules of lateral leaflet 0.1–0.3 cm; leaflet oblong or ovate-elliptic, 0.8–2.8 × 0.4–1.6 cm, leaf blade abaxially light green, adaxially dark green, pubescent on both surfaces, lateral veins 3–5 pairs, veinlets slightly raised, base slightly cordate or subtruncate, apex acute, margin undulate with 2–5 rounded teeth on each side. Inflorescence a compound cyme, axillary; peduncle 4–6 cm, densely pubescent; bracts present on lower part of inflorescence axis; pedicel 3–5 mm, pubescent. Calyx cupular, entire, pubescent. Petals 4, oval, 1.5– 2 mm, with papillose hairs. Stamens 4, anthers yellow, oval; floral disk well developed, margin undulate. Ovary with its lower part adnate to disk; style short, 1–1.5 mm long at anthesis. Fruit a 2–3-seeded berry, globose, 4–7 mm in diam. Seeds semi-globose, ca. 1.7–4.7 mm in diam., chalaza linear, with a membrane covering the pair of ventral infolds.

  • Distribution and Habitat—The new species is only known from its type locality in the limestone mountains of Ninh Thuan, Vietnam (Fig. 4).

  • Etymology—The epithet “cheniana” is to honor the first author Limin Lu's supervisor, Zhiduan Chen, who first discovered the new species and has made significant contributions to Vitaceae collections all over the world.

  • Consevation Status —Cayratia cheniana is only known from its type locality and is critically endangered (CR) according to the IUCN red list criteria (IUCN 2012).

Acknowledgments.

We are grateful to Van Du Nguyen, Jingbo Zhang, and Van Hieu Nguyen for field assistance, Ai-Li Li for the line drawing, Sadaf Habib for taking seed photos, and Russell Barrett for helpful comments on the manuscript. We also thank Dr. Steven R. Manchester, one anonymous reviewer, and the Editor-in-Chief Dr. James F. Smith for their valuable suggestions. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NNSF 31500179 and NNSF 31270268). Field work in Vietnam was partially supported by the External Cooperation Program of BIC, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. GJHZ 201321), CAS International Research & Education Development Program (Grant No. SAJC201315), and Science and Technology Basic Work (2013FY112100).

Literature Cited

  1. Chen, P.-T , L.-Q. Chen , and J. Wen . 2011. The first phylogenetic analysis of Tetrastigma (Miq.) Planch., the host of Rafflesiaceae. Taxon 60: 499–512. Google Scholar

  2. Chen, Z.-D. , H. Ren , and J. Wen . 2007. Vitaceae. Pp. 173–222 in Flora of China vol. 12, eds. Z.-Y. Wu , D.-Y. Hong , and P.H. Raven . Beijing: Science Press and St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press. Google Scholar

  3. Gagnepain, F. 1911. Un genre méconnu: classification des Cissus et Cayratia. Notulae Systematicae 1: 339–363. Google Scholar

  4. Galet, P. 1967. Recherches sur les méthodes d'identification et de classification des Vitacées des zones tempérées. Montpellier: University of Montpellier. Google Scholar

  5. Ickert-Bond, S. M. , J. Gerrath , and J. Wen . 2015. Gynoecial structure of Vitales and implications for the evolution of placentation in the rosids. international Journal of Plant Sciences 175: 998–1032. Google Scholar

  6. IUCN. 2012. IUCN red list categories and criteria version 3.1. Ed. 2. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, U. K.: IUCN. Google Scholar

  7. Jackes, B. R. and M. Rossetto . 2006. A new combination in Clematicissus Planch. (Vitaceae). Telopea 11: 390–391. Google Scholar

  8. Jiménez-Saa, H. 2011. Revised nomenclature of compound leaves as an aid in field identification of tropical trees and other woody plants. Vulpia 9: 1–11. Google Scholar

  9. Jussieu, A. L. D. 1818. Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles. Ed. 2. Strasbourg: F. G. Levrault, Éditeur. Paris: Le Normant, rue de Seine. Google Scholar

  10. Latiff, A. 1981. Studies in Malesian Vitaceae V. The genus Cayratia in the Malay Peninsula. Sains Malaysiana 10: 129–139. Google Scholar

  11. Li, C.-L. 1998. Vitaceae. Pp. 1–177 in Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae. Beijing: Science Press. Google Scholar

  12. Liu, B. , Y. Yang , L. Xie , G. Zeng , and K.-P. Ma . 2013. Beilschmiedia turbinata: A newly recognized but dying species of Lauraceae from tropical Asia based on morphological and molecular data. PLoS One 8: e67636. Google Scholar

  13. Lomolino, M. V. , B. R. Riddle , R. J. Whittaker , and J. H. Brown . 2010. Biogeography. Ed. 4. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates. Google Scholar

  14. Loureiro, J. D. 1790. Flora Cochinchinensis: sistens plantas in regno Cochinchina nascentes; quibus accedunt aliae observatae in Sinensi imperio, Africa orientali, Indiaeque locis variis; omnes dispositae secundum systema sexuale Linnaeanum. Ulyssipone: Typis, et expensis Academicis. Google Scholar

  15. Lu, L.-M. , W. Wang , Z.-D. Chen , and J. Wen . 2013. Phylogeny of the non-monophyletic Cayratia Juss. (Vitaceae) and implications for character evolution and biogeography. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 68: 502–515. Google Scholar

  16. Merrill, E. D. 1916. New or interesting Philippine Vitaceae. Philippine Journal of Science 125: 125–145. Google Scholar

  17. Merrill, E. D. 1935. A commentary on Loureiro's “Flora Conchinchinensis”. Philadelphia: Transactions of the Amerian Philosophical Society. Google Scholar

  18. Miller, M. A. , W. Pfeiffer , and T. Schwartz . 2010. “Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees”. Pp 1–8 in Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE). New Orleans: Gateway Computing. Google Scholar

  19. Moore, M. O. and J. Wen . In press. Vitaceae. In Flora of North America north of Mexico vol. 12, eds. Flora of North America Editorial Committee. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

  20. Nylander, J. A. A. 2004. MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. Uppsala: Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University. Google Scholar

  21. Planchon, J. E. 1887. Monographie des Ampélidées vrais. Pp. 305–654 in Monographiae Phanaerogamarum vol. 5(2), eds. A. F. P. P. De Candolle and C. De Candolle . Paris: Sumptibus G. Masson. Google Scholar

  22. Ren, H. , L.-M. Lu , A. Soejima , Q. Luke , D.-X. Zhang , Z.-D. Chen , and J. Wen . 2011. Phylogenetic analysis of the grape family (Vitaceae) based on the noncoding plastid trnC-petN, trnH-psbA, and trnL-F sequences. Taxon 60: 629–637. Google Scholar

  23. Ronquist, F. , M. Teslenko , P. van der Mark , D. L. Ayres , A. Darling , S. Höhna , B. Larget , L. Liu , M. A. Suchard , and J. P. Huelsenbeck . 2012. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542. Google Scholar

  24. Rossetto, M. , D. M. Crayn , B. R. Jackes , and C. Porter . 2007. An updated estimate of intergeneric phylogenetic relationships in the Australian Vitaceae. Canadian Journal of Botany 85: 722–730. Google Scholar

  25. SA2000. (Systematics Agenda 2000). 1994. Charting the biosphere: a global initiative to discover, describe and classify the world's species. Technical report. New York: American Society of Plant Taxonomists, Society of Systematic Biologists, and the Willi Hennig Society. Google Scholar

  26. Soejima, A. and J. Wen . 2006. Phylogenetic analysis of the grape family (Vitaceae) based on three chloroplast markers. American Journal of Botany 93: 278–287. Google Scholar

  27. Stamatakis, A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688–2690. Google Scholar

  28. Süssenguth, K. 1953. Vitaceae. Pp. 174–333 in Die natrülichen Pflanzenfamilien vol. 20d, eds. A. Engler and K. Prantl . Berlin: Duncker and Humblot. Google Scholar

  29. Trias-Blasi, A. , J. A. N. Parnell , and T. R. Hodkinson . 2012. Multi-gene region phylogenetic analysis of the grape family (Vitaceae). Systematic Botany 37: 941–950. Google Scholar

  30. Wen, J. 2007. Vitaceae. Pp. 467–479 in The families and genera of vascular plants vol. 9, ed. K. Kubitzki . Berlin: Springer Verlag. Google Scholar

  31. Wen, J. , J. K. Boggan , and Z.-L. Nie . 2014. Synopsis of Nekemias Raf., a segregate genus from Ampelopsis Michx. (Vitaceae) disjunct between eastern/southeastern Asia and eastern North America, with ten new combinations. PhytoKeys 42: 11–19. Google Scholar

  32. Wen, J. , S. M. Ickert-Bond , M. S. Appelhans , L. J. Dorr , and V. A. Funk . 2015a. Collections-based systematics: Opportunities and outlook for 2050. Journal of Systematics and Evolution , https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12181Google Scholar

  33. Wen, J. , L.-M. Lu , and J. K. Boggan . 2013a. Diversity and evolution of Vitaceae in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Science 142: 223–244. Google Scholar

  34. Wen, J. , L.-M. Lu , Z.-L. Nie , S. R. Manchester , S. M. Ickert-Bond , and Z.-D. Chen . 2015b. Phylogenetics and a revised classification of Vitaceae. Presented at Botany 2015, Edmonton, Alberta. Google Scholar

  35. Wen, J. , Z.-L. Nie , A. Soejima , and Y. Meng . 2007. Phylogeny of Vitaceae based on the nuclear GAI1 gene sequences. Canadian Journal of Botany 85: 731–745. Google Scholar

  36. Wen, J. , R. H. Ree , S. M. Ickert-Bond , Z.-L. Nie , and V. Funk . 2013b. Biogeography: Where do we go from here? Taxon 62: 912–927. Google Scholar

  37. Wen, J. , Z. Xiong , Z.-L. Nie , L. Mao , Y. Zhu , X.-Z. Kan , S. M. Ickert-Bond , J. Gerrath , E. A. Zimmer , and X.-D. Fang . 2013c. Transcriptome sequences resolve deep relationships of the grape family. PLoS One 8: e74394. Google Scholar

  38. Wilson, E. O. 1992. The diversity of life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar

  39. Zhang, N. , J. Wen , and E. A. Zimmer . 2015. Expression patterns of AP1, FUL, FT and LEAFY orthologs in Vitaceae support the homology of tendrils and inflorescences throughout the grape family. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 53: 469–476. Google Scholar

  40. Zwickl, D. J. 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. Ph.D. thesis Austin: The University of Texas. Google Scholar

© Copyright 2016 by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists
Limin Lu, Jun Wen, and Zhiduan Chen "Cayratia cheniana (Vitaceae): An Endangered New Species Endemic to the Limestone Mountains of Ninh Thuan Province, Vietnam," Systematic Botany 41(1), 49-55, (11 February 2016). https://doi.org/10.1600/036364416X690741
Published: 11 February 2016
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top