Translator Disclaimer
11 February 2019 The Misuse of Genetics: The Dihybrid Cross & the Threat of “Race Crossing”
Mark Shotwell
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Biology teachers consider basic Mendelian genetics to be value-free, objective science, immune to misinterpretation and misuse. It may thus come as a surprise to learn that in the early days of genetics a cornerstone of genetics education, the dihybrid cross, was employed to support claims of the racial superiority of whites over blacks and to provide a “scientificrationale for laws prohibiting interracial marriages. In 1917 the prominent eugenicist Charles B. Davenport warned of the danger of “disharmonious combinationsof physical and behavioral traits in the second generation of “wide race crosses,” equivalent to the F2 generation of a dihybrid cross. He tried and failed to find data to support his arguments in a study of the mixed-race inhabitants of Jamaica. Davenport's analysis was deeply flawed, especially by the racist assumptions underlying this work. Although these events occurred a century ago, biology teachers may still be able to use this regrettable episode as an example of how even the most basic science may be misapplied by those with a social or political agenda.

© 2019 National Association of Biology Teachers. All rights reserved. Please direct all requests for permission to photocopy or reproduce article content through the University of California Press's Reprints and Permissions web page, www.ucpress.edu/journals.php?p=reprints.
Mark Shotwell "The Misuse of Genetics: The Dihybrid Cross & the Threat of “Race Crossing”," The American Biology Teacher 81(1), 3-10, (11 February 2019). https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2019.81.1.3
Published: 11 February 2019
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

Share
SHARE
KEYWORDS
EUGENICS
history of biology
Mendelian genetics
RACE
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top