How to translate text using browser tools
1 July 2000 Detecting Area Sensitivity: A Comment on Previous Studies
DAVID JOSEPH HORN, ROBERT J. FLETCHER Jr., ROLF R. KOFORD
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Several studies have reported that some grassland birds are area sensitive; they exhibit a nonrandom avoidance of small fields. The methods used to test for area sensitivity, however, differed among studies. Some investigators sampled fields with sampling effort proportional to field size, whereas others used equal sampling effort in all fields. We created a simulation model with the same number of fields and field sizes as those examined in earlier studies to determine if birds that select habitat randomly would display area sensitivity if fields were sampled in proportion to their size. The three species that we modeled to settle randomly, upland sandpiper (Bartramia longicauda), Henslow's sparrow (Ammodramus henslowii) and eastern meadowlark (Sturnella magna), had positive relationships between occurrence and field size when a complete census or proportional sampling was used, and therefore, would have been considered area sensitive by the methods used by some previous authors. When equal-effort sampling was used, these species showed no relationship between occurrence and field size. Future studies on area sensitivity that use proportional sampling should compare results to a null model. Otherwise, conclusions made about area sensitivity may be erroneous because the response is a sampling artifact.

DAVID JOSEPH HORN, ROBERT J. FLETCHER Jr., and ROLF R. KOFORD "Detecting Area Sensitivity: A Comment on Previous Studies," The American Midland Naturalist 144(1), 28-35, (1 July 2000). https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031(2000)144[0028:DASACO]2.0.CO;2
Received: 27 May 1999; Accepted: 1 December 1999; Published: 1 July 2000
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top