Translator Disclaimer
1 April 2010 Ratsnakes and Brush Piles: Intended and Unintended Consequences of Improving Habitat for Wildlife?
Jinelle H. Sperry, Patrick J. Weatherhead
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Brush pile creation is a common habitat management method used to attract wildlife. However, there is a paucity of data regarding effectiveness of brush pile creation and the indirect effects of brush piles on multi-species interactions. Here we document use of man-made brush piles by Texas ratsnakes (Elaphe obsoleta), examine mechanisms behind that use, and present results of a pilot study comparing avian nest success in areas with and without brush piles to determine if predator attraction to brush piles negatively affects the surrounding bird community. Radio-tracked snakes were found in brush piles 10% of the time, despite brush piles comprising less than 0.2% of the habitat by area. More abundant small mammals and more moderate temperatures in brush piles than in surrounding habitats could explain snakes' attraction to brush piles. Nest success of birds was similar in areas with and without brush piles in the year following brush pile creation. Because it may take substantially longer than 1 y for snake use to reach its maximum, however, it is premature to conclude that brush piles do not affect birds nesting in adjacent habitat. Given the apparent prevalence of brush pile creation, and the demonstrated preference of brush piles by ratsnakes, further research to document the consequences of brush pile creation is warranted.

Jinelle H. Sperry and Patrick J. Weatherhead "Ratsnakes and Brush Piles: Intended and Unintended Consequences of Improving Habitat for Wildlife?," The American Midland Naturalist 163(2), 311-317, (1 April 2010). https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031-163.2.311
Received: 3 April 2009; Accepted: 1 July 2009; Published: 1 April 2010
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top