Translator Disclaimer
1 April 2012 Illinois Birds: A Century of Change
Author Affiliations +

This book looks at bird populations in Illinois over a hundred-year time span, from the early 1900s to the early 2000s. No other geographic region has quantitative data on bird populations for a hundred-year period, for one simple reason: only Illinois had Stephen A. Forbes.

The Midwest was a hotbed of ecological thought in the later years of the 19th century. It is doubtful that anyone else understood the dimensions of ecology as fully as Forbes, a professor of zoology at the University of Illinois and the first chief of the Illinois Natural History Survey (INHS). He saw ecology as the interactions of organisms occurring within a system that, perhaps to avoid coining a new term, he called a microcosm. He saw the evolutionary implications of these processes. He also saw the need for methods to generate quantitative data for both theoretical and practical purposes. Among other innovations, he devised a bird census technique for large-scale counts of birds.

The Forbes technique used transects produced by two observers walking parallel lines 50 yards apart and counting all the birds in the strip or crossing it ahead of them. The first census, during 1906–1909, employed two young Illinoisans, Alfred Otto Gross and Howard A. Ray. Gross went on to get a Ph.D. at Harvard, had a long career at Bowdoin College, and produced many ornithological papers, including ones on the Dickcissel (Spiza americana) in Illinois, the extinction of the Heath Hen (Tympanuchus cupido cupido), and Snowy Owl (Bubo scandiacus) irruptions. Of Ray's life after he left Illinois, little is known.

Fifty years later, Richard Graber was hired as the non-game-bird biologist at INHS, with repetition of the Forbes census (1956–1958) as one of his first tasks. He was accompanied in the move—and the censusing—by his wife, Jean. Both were excellent ornithologists, recent Ph.D.'s from the University of Oklahoma, students of George M. Sutton.

Now INHS has completed a third iteration (2007–2009) of the census. The results, comparisons, and conclusions are in this substantial 8 1/2 × 11 inch volume with an attractive color cover (meadowlarks by Carolyn Peet Nixon) and many graphs, maps, photographs of birds and habitats, and aerial photographs. Historical material, such as photos of Gross and Ray in camp with their collecting guns or Dick and Jean Graber striding along the sides of one of their transects, are in black and white, but other illustrations are in color. It's a book that any person or institution interested in animal populations and habitats, past, present, or future, in the Midwest or elsewhere, ought to own.

Following the introduction, a methods section describes how consistency was maintained in the two repetitions of the census. The 2000s census added point counts, little used in the publication itself, but available for comparison with what has become, for good or ill, the standard method for large-scale population counts of birds.

Section 3 describes changes in the state's landscape from 1820 to 2010. In 1820, most of the land was tall-grass prairie (nearly two-thirds) and forest (about one-third). Savanna was mostly submerged in the first two categories, and wetlands were less than 10 percent. By the time of the Gross-Ray census (1900s), most of the prairie had been plowed, most of the forest cut, and most of the wetlands drained. Corn occupied the largest proportion of the landscape, as it would for the whole hundred years, with no end in sight.

A strength of Illinois Birds is that the vegetation classification used is realistic, reflecting existing plant cover rather than being based on the original natural vegetation, which now exists mostly as scattered fragments. The 11 basic categories are corn, soybeans, small grains, hay, pasture, idle or fallow, urban, prairie, marsh, forest, and other.

Section 4, “Bird Communities through Time,” gives quantitative population data on the bird species that occupied the different vegetation types in each of the three census periods. Relative abundance—the number of individuals of a given species seen in the habitat as a percentage of the number of individuals of all species seen there—is the main statistic used.

Quantitative information on bird populations by habitat is hard to come by. Such information is absent from Breeding Bird Surveys (BBS) and almost all breeding-bird atlas projects. The Illinois study also notes how the habitats themselves have changed. Orchards, pastures, and hayfields in the 1900s and, to a lesser degree, the 1950s held a diverse avifauna that included many native species of fairly narrow requirements. These agricultural habitats structurally mimicked savanna and grassland communities and were inhabited by many bird species characteristic of the natural communities. The orchards, pastures, and hayfields of today occupy much less acreage, match up less well structurally with any natural vegetation, and, even when they attract native species, may fail to contribute to the next generation. Today's hayfields, with their early and frequent mowings, are such an ecological trap.

Section 5 considers population changes individually for 40+ selected species. The measure used is density per hundred acres based on the transect counts. For comparative purposes, birds per BBS route (Illinois routes 1966–2007) are given. Also introduced is occupancy rate (stated as proportion of sites occupied by a given species). Less straightforward than the other figures presented, occupancy rates attempt to correct for species missed at a given census site because of various factors that might influence detectability, such as time of day. The computed occupancy values should be comparable from one census period to another. For many species, Section 5 also analyzes species data by region (south, central, and north).

Each species account has a short text and a photograph of the bird. Most include a bar graph, “Proportion of sites occupied,” that shows occupancy rates in south, central, and north for the three census periods. Also often present is a dot graph of BBS results with a fitted trend line and a bar graph giving birds per hundred acres by vegetation type.

Section 6 is about changes in the past—sound information about what happened from the 1900s to the 2000s with economical, common-sense assessments of causes—and changes in the future with equally sensible and parsimonious projections of what may be in store for us. This section and, of course, Illinois Birds as a whole are full of fascinating information. What's the only clearly established member of the avifauna to have gone to zero since 1906? Bachman's Sparrow (Peucaea aestivalis) was seen by Gross and Ray and again by the Grabers but is now absent after a seemingly steep decline in the 1970s.

One potentially informative way of grouping species is based on how each species changed in the two repeat censuses (up, down, or steady, based on occupancy rates). Forty species in eight categories are specified. “Up” in the 1950s and still up in the 2000s is termed “early increase.” The diverse examples include the Rock Pigeon (Columba livia), Kentucky Warbler (Geothlypis formosa), and Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis). Up in the 1950s and then up some more in the 2000s is “consistent increase.” Examples include the Horned Lark (Eremophila alpestris) and House Wren (Troglodytes aedon).

The Yellow-billed Cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus) and Northern Bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) were among the “consistent decreasers,” down and then down some more. Several species showed a “dip,” down and then up. The heavy use of chlorinated hydrocarbons, ca. 1945–1972, is suggested as a possible cause of this pattern in at least some of the species.

A few species showed little change from the 1900s to 2000s. The Mourning Dove (Zenaida macroura) was spectacularly stable as well as being common in all three sections of the state. The Acadian Flycatcher (Empidonax virescens) had steady occupancy rates over time but was common in the south, medium in central Illinois, and low in the north.

A related matter is an attempt to pick future winners and losers. Several species, such as the Bobolink (Dolichonyx oryzivorus), Eastern Whip-poor-will (Caprimulgus vociferus), and Redheaded Woodpecker (Melanerpes erythrocephalu), are nominated for extirpation in the next 50 years. Nominated to increase in the next 50 years are such species as the Black-bellied Whistling-Duck (Dendrocygna autumnalis), Trumpeter Swan (Cygnus buccinator), Blue Grosbeak (Passerina caerulea), and Fish Crow (Corvus ossifragus). Most of those tagged as increasers are southern species destined to move north with global warming. Some are already showing a strong expansionist signal.

For Illinois or elsewhere, maintaining biodiversity of the native avifauna could have two components. One obvious course is retaining natural ecosystems by means of preserves and sanctuaries. The other is managing the rest of the landscape to provide habitat acceptable to the native species. Illinois Birds provides evidence in the bird lists of some of the 1900s agricultural lands that this second approach is feasible. Future events may provide evidence that the approach is also essential. Unfortunately, agricultural trends of the past 30 years have mostly run in the opposite direction, toward increasingly hostile landscapes.

Certain types of developed land are the other fraction of today's non-native landscapes where management for native biodiversity might be incorporated. Here the Illinois findings are a little more encouraging. Promising possibilities could be adopted more widely and amplified. The use of native plants in landscaping, including around streams and water bodies, could be increased. Attempts to facilitate nesting could be extended to a great variety of bird species—not just cavity and ledge/platform nesters but many others that have stereotyped nest sites.

In Illinois, as in most places, the acreage of preserved natural areas is small. We might suppose that this relatively small area contains a sizable fraction of the remaining native biodiversity, but Illinois Birds has little to tell us on this score. The Forbes technique tends to take the land as it comes (though both the 1950s and 2000s censuses did some supplementary sampling to add acreage of the rarer nearby habitats).

Even if directly applicable data are not available, we might learn something from Dick and Jean Graber 's example. Over the course of the Grabers' 30-odd years of travel and study in Illinois, their knowledge of the land and dedication to preserving biodiversity grew. One outcome was that from their modest resources, they bought nearly 500 acres, largely forested, in the Shawnee Hills above the Ohio River in southern Illinois and eventually donated it to the Illinois Audubon Society as the War Bluff Valley Sanctuary. Jean, still living near the Sanctuary, provided the foreword to Illinois Birds.


I thank R. Adams, M. A. Sydlik, and K. Takahashi for comments.

© The American Ornithologists' Union, 2012.
Richard Brewer "Illinois Birds: A Century of Change," The Auk 129(2), (1 April 2012).
Published: 1 April 2012

Back to Top