Translator Disclaimer
1 April 2015 Next-generation paleornithology: Technological and methodological advances allow new insights into the evolutionary and ecological histories of living birds
Author Affiliations +

Paleornithology, the study of fossil or ancient bird remains, provides an important context for understanding the biology, evolutionary history, and ecology of living birds. Recent technological and methodological advances in the field of paleornithology have opened up the potential to extract new pools of information from fossil bird remains, and hence provide new insights into the histories of living birds. Here we review some of these advances, covering aspects of ancient DNA and protein analyses, sedimentary proxies for birds, stable isotope analyses, coprolite analyses, high-resolution computed tomography, paleoneurology, finite elements analysis, and paleohistology. These new advances offer exciting prospects for the future of paleornithology, but also reaffirm the importance of basic fieldwork, exploration and the discovery of new fossil specimens, museum archives in which to curate the specimens, and traditional morphological approaches to studying the fossil remains.

Modern birds (Neornithes; Gadow 1893; used here in reference to crown group Aves) include over 10,000 extant species (Gill and Donsker 2014), which occupy a diverse array of ecological niches and occur in almost all environments and habitats on Earth. Their widespread distribution, varied and often beautiful plumages and songs, and diverse array of life histories have long attracted the interest of scientists and amateur enthusiasts alike. As a result, birds have been widely studied for at least several hundred years (Bircham 2007). The development of ornithology as a science continues to this day, with the application of rapidly developing technologies, such as molecular tools and satellite tracking systems, providing new insights into many aspects of avian biology (Bircham 2007). However, a complete understanding of many aspects of the biology and ecology of living birds requires a broader temporal context than studies of extant individuals or populations can provide. Paleornithology (the scientific study of fossil, extinct, or prehistoric bird remains) plays an important role in providing this extended temporal view. Through the study of ancient bird remains we can gain further insights into avian biology, a broader perspective on the evolutionary pathways of birds, and a better understanding of how living bird taxa might respond in the face of future environmental change.

Fascination with fossil birds goes back centuries; a report of a fossilized bird's nest was published as early as the 13th century (see Lambrecht 1916, 1933). Yet the field of paleornithology perhaps has its true origins in the scientific debate around fossilized bird remains (at the time referred to as ‘ornitholites') discovered during the 18th and 19th centuries (e.g., Scheuchzer 1708, Lamanon 1782, Cuvier 1800, 1807). With the subsequent development of comparative osteology of living birds (e.g., Huxley 1867, Fürbringer 1888, Newton 1893) and evolutionary theory (Darwin 1859) in the 19th century, the study of fossil birds began to shed new light on the evolutionary and ecological histories of extant avian lineages (e.g., Milne-Edwards 1867–1871, Owen 1879, Lambrecht 1933). Although the total number of extinct neornithine species that are known to science has not been totaled, the relative significance of fossil birds for understanding avian biology and ecology soon becomes apparent when one considers just a few of the figures published for discrete geographic regions or time periods. For example, ~500 species-level taxa have been described from Paleogene (66–23 Ma) deposits around the world (Mayr 2009), >800 species are represented in the Cenozoic fossil record of Europe alone (Mlíkovský 2002), and some researchers have estimated that more than 1,000 nonpasserine bird species may have gone extinct on Pacific islands during the Late Holocene (as a result of human impacts following island colonisations; Duncan et al. 2013).

For most of its history, the field of paleornithology has been largely centered on comparative osteology, and this approach still plays a dominant role in understanding the taxonomic relationships and paleobiology of fossil birds. Perhaps for more than any other group of living vertebrates, ecological adaptations to specific modes of life are reflected in the skeletons of birds (Cheneval 1989), and because these adaptations are, for the most part, well-understood in extant birds, osteological comparisons have been useful for inferring the biology and ecology of fossil taxa (Lambrecht 1933, Feduccia 1999). However, paleornithology is now expanding rapidly in regard to the analytical techniques being used. Technological and methodological advances during the past couple of decades in several areas of science relevant to this field have brought about a revolution in the types and amount of data that can be generated by studying the remains of fossil and extinct bird taxa. In this paper we outline some of the key recent (21st century) advances in the field of paleornithology, focusing specifically on those that have aided our understanding of the evolutionary and ecological histories of living birds (Table 1). We also provide perspectives on the current state of the field and the directions in which we see it moving in the future.


Summary of key paleornithological techniques that have undergone recent advances as discussed in the text. The age of avian remains or sediments to which they are applicable, and what they can tell us about the evolutionary and ecological history of living birds, are also shown.


Ancient DNA and Proteins

Perhaps the greatest technological and methodological advances relevant to paleornithology that have been made during the 21st century are those related to the field of ancient DNA (aDNA) research. While molecular studies of living birds have played a key role in developing our understanding of the phylogenetic relationships among bird taxa, aDNA has taken this a step further by allowing extinct taxa to be placed within molecular phylogenetic frameworks, permitting a ‘real-time' view of temporal genetic change and providing unique insights into the biology and ecology of extinct bird species.

Ancient DNA research is a field still in its relative infancy (see Rizzi et al. 2013 for a recent review). However, due to the rapid technological advances being made in genetic sciences, current methods and techniques are almost unrecognizable compared with those that produced the first aDNA sequences from ancient specimens during the mid-1980s. A key recent advance in aDNA research has been the adoption of high-throughput DNA sequencing platforms (the development of which has been driven largely by medical research), meaning that genomic-scale sequencing is now possible for extinct and ancient specimens (Huynen et al. 2012, Meyer et al. 2012, Orlando et al. 2013, Prüfer et al. 2014). Such technology continues to become more cost-efficient, in terms of the number of bases sequenced per dollar (Shendure and Ji 2008, Kircher and Kelso 2010), as well as reducing the amount of time required to sequence genomes. New protocols also continue to be developed for increasing the efficiency of aDNA recovery from ancient specimens (e.g., Gnirke et al. 2009, Mertes et al. 2011, Gansauge and Meyer 2013), and in future such methods may potentially increase the temporal range of aDNA studies. It has been shown that early reports of aDNA having been extracted from geologically ancient fossils (e.g., Golenberg et al. 1990, Cano et al. 1992, Woodward et al. 1994) were erroneous and were a result of contamination of samples by modern DNA (Zischler et al. 1995, Austin et al. 1997, Willerslev and Cooper 2005), an issue that is now better understood and routinely controlled for in aDNA research (Cooper and Poinar 2000, Hebsgaard et al. 2005). Currently, the oldest authentic aDNA sequence retrieved from a fossil bone (from a horse) stands at 560–780 thousand years (Orlando et al. 2013), but theoretical evidence suggests that DNA molecules may persist in such remains for up to 6.8 million years under optimal conditions (Allentoft et al. 2012). Moreover, the types of ancient bird remains from which aDNA has been successfully extracted continues to grow (Huynen et al. 2012). In addition to bone (e.g., Cooper et al. 2001), aDNA has now also been extracted from ancient feathers (Rawlence et al. 2009, Olsen et al. 2012), eggshells (Oskam et al. 2010, 2011), coprolites (Wood et al. 2008, 2012), and sediments (Willerslev et al. 2003); coprolitic and sedimentary aDNA are discussed in more detail in the ‘Coprolite Analyses' and ‘Sedimentary Proxies for Birds' sections below, respectively.

Due to their large size, relatively recent extinction date, and abundance of fossil remains, the ratite moa (Dinornithiformes) of New Zealand have long been the poster-children for aDNA studies of birds. More specimens from moa have been studied using DNA techniques than from any other extinct taxon (Allentoft and Rawlence 2012). The first aDNA sequences obtained for birds were from moa bones (Cooper et al. 1992), as were the first complete ancient avian mitochondrial (mt) genomes (Cooper et al. 2001, Haddrath and Baker 2001), ancient avian microsatellite markers (Allentoft et al. 2009), and the first sex-linked nuclear DNA sequences from an extinct species (Bunce et al. 2003, Huynen et al. 2003; Figure 1). Since the 1990s, a raft of studies on moa tissues have highlighted the breadth of information that aDNA can reveal about extinct bird species, including aspects of phylogenetic relationships, evolution, physical appearance, sensory capabilities, and population dynamics (e.g., Aidala et al. 2012, Rawlence et al. 2012, Allentoft et al. 2014, Huynen et al. 2014, with earlier work reviewed by Allentoft and Rawlence 2012 and Worthy and Scofield 2012). Moreover, molecular analyses of associated remains have provided insights into the biology of moa and their ultimate demise. For example, ancient DNA analysis of moa eggshells has provided insights into the moa-hunting strategies of early settlers and subsequent extinction dynamics (Oskam et al. 2011). Recently, aDNA has also been used in the analysis of moa coprolites, providing unequivocal identification of the depositor (important when there were several sympatric species at a site), and thus allowing niche partitioning and broken ecological links to be examined (Wood et al. 2013a), as well as allowing the gastrointestinal parasite communities associated with these extinct birds to be characterized (Wood et al. 2013b). Coprolite analyses are discussed in more detail in a later section of this paper.


Cumulative number of avian species (extant vs. extinct) for which mitochondrial (mt) genomes have been sequenced, with key milestones in the genetic analysis of extinct bird species.


However, apart from moa, the application of aDNA to avian studies has lagged behind that of mammals. Complete (or near-complete, i.e. >15,000 base pairs) mt genomes for just seven extinct bird species have been published at the time of writing (Emeus crassus, Dinornis robustus, Anomalopteryx didiformis, Ectopistes migratorius, Anas chathamica, Mullerornis agilis, and Aepyornis hildebrandti; Cooper et al. 2001, Haddrath and Baker 2001, Hung et al. 2013, Mitchell et al. 2014a, 2014b), representing only 2.3% of the 304 bird species for which mt genomes were available on GenBank in July 2014. Eight ancient mitogenomes have also been sequenced from the extant Adelie Penguin (Pygoscelis adeliae; Subramanian et al. 2009). Just recently, the first large portions of nuclear genomes from an extinct bird species were sequenced from the Passenger Pigeon (Ectopistes migratorius; Hung et al. 2014). But, overall, this is relatively few compared with the number of mt genomes and nuclear genomes that have now been produced for ancient humans and other mammal species (>124 reported by Paijmans et al. 2013).

One potential application of aDNA research on ancient bird remains is ‘de-extinction,' a topic that has gained much attention recently. The basis of de-extinction is to re-create extinct species, with the ultimate goal of taking the concept of rewilding to the next level by restoring the ecosystem functions once provided by extinct species (Seddon et al. 2014). However, whether the re-created species will exhibit any of the behavioral and ecological traits of the original species is a matter of debate, and there are a large number of ethical (Sandler 2014) and legal (Carlin et al. 2014) considerations involved with the de-extinction process. Two of the main methods proposed for de-extinction, somatic cell nuclear transfer and genetic engineering (Carlin et al. 2014), both rely heavily on aDNA techniques. The latter is the method currently being used in a project aiming to re-create the Passenger Pigeon, through splicing key genes from the Passenger Pigeon into the genome of a near relative, the Band-tailed Pigeon (Patagioenas fasciata; Revive & Restore 2014). A similar technology has recently been used in a study in which genes related to wing formation from the extinct moa were re-created and studied in vivo through splicing into chicken embryos (Huynen et al. 2014).

Without going to the extreme of reconstituting extinct species, there is also the potential for aDNA analyses to help inform the conservation management of currently rare and threatened bird taxa. A key conservation concern for small, fragmented populations is the loss of genetic diversity. DNA analysis of prehistoric bones can help to determine the natural level of genetic diversity within a species prior to its decline, thus providing a baseline against which to compare current populations (e.g., Bouzat et al. 1998, Shapiro et al. 2004, Chan et al. 2005). This may, in future, lead to the reintroduction of lost genetic diversity into extant species using gene splicing technologies. Recent analyses of archaeological chicken bones have also highlighted the potential for aDNA to explore issues of human-mediated dispersal and domestication processes (Flink et al. 2014, Thomson et al. 2014, Xiang et al. 2014).

Proteins may persist for longer than DNA molecules (Buckley and Collins 2011), and therefore might extend the temporal limits of molecular phylogenetic signals from fossil bird remains. Techniques for sequencing ancient proteins have undergone major developments recently (see Hofreiter et al. 2012 for a review). As a result, authentic protein sequences with meaningful phylogenetic signals have now been obtained from bones up to 1.5 million years old (Wadsworth and Buckley 2013). Proteins have also been reported from Cretaceous dinosaur bones (e.g., Schweitzer et al. 2007). Although this is certainly an exciting prospect, as the ability to examine proteins in fossil bird bones that are tens of millions of years old would undoubtedly provide major new insights into avian evolution and the taxonomic relationships between fossil and living birds, significant scientific debate remains regarding the authenticity of these results (Service 2009). The true temporal limits of protein preservation in fossils remain to be tested.

Presently, the broadest application of ancient proteins lies in providing a molecular ‘barcode' with which to identify bones and eggshell fragments, a technique named ZooMS (Zooarchaeology by Mass Spectrometry; e.g., Stewart et al. 2013). This has been most widely applied in archaeology, but also has potential applications for paleontology. Current methods can routinely identify remains to family or genus, but require further refinement to attain species-level taxonomic resolution (Hofreiter et al. 2012).

It is also worth noting that the past decade has seen important advances in the way that molecular (and morphological) data can be used to infer relationships among taxa. In particular, new approaches to combining molecular data and morphological characters have helped to improve our understanding of the evolutionary histories of birds (e.g., Bertelli and Giannini 2005, Mitchell et al. 2014b). The development of new statistical techniques for examining phylogenies and the application of preexisting phylogenetic techniques to new areas have also helped resolve issues around equivocal relationships within fossil birds (e.g., Lee and Worthy 2011).

Sedimentary Proxies for Birds

Historically, the study of ancient birds has largely relied on visible physical or trace remains, such as bones or footprints. However, a range of sedimentary proxies for birds are now routinely used, and new ones continue to be developed. These proxies provide information on ancient bird populations based solely on the biological or chemical traces of their presence preserved in sediments. Many of these proxies are semiquantitative, and can therefore provide useful insights into the responses of bird populations to past environmental changes (especially during the Pleistocene and Holocene epochs). Such data have clear implications for predicting the potential impacts of future climatic and environmental change on avian species.

The most widely used sedimentary proxies for birds are geochemical, and can be classified as either trace element (Liu et al. 2006a, 2006b, 2007, 2011, 2013, Xie and Sun 2008, Brimble et al. 2009, Huang et al. 2009, 2011, Nie et al. 2014a) or stable isotope (Hawke 2004, Sun et al. 2005, Yuan et al. 2010, Keatley et al. 2011, Liu et al. 2013, Nie et al. 2014b) proxies. A key strength of geochemical proxies is their ability to record marine inputs into terrestrial ecosystems, and therefore their main utility has been for inferring the past distribution (e.g., Hawke et al. 1999, Yuan et al. 2010), colony longevity (Hawke 2004), and population trends (e.g., Sun et al. 2005, Liu et al. 2006a, 2007, Huang et al. 2009, 2011) of marine birds such as procellariiforms and penguins. Important trace element indicators of seabird guano in terrestrial sediments include As, Cd, Cu, Se, Zn, P, F, and Ni (Liu et al. 2006a, 2007, 2013, Brimble et al. 2009). More recently, rare-earth elements have also been proven to be an effective avian proxy (Liu et al. 2011, Nie et al. 2014a). Isotopic proxies for seabirds include δ15N (although recently it has been suggested that Δ15N may be more useful in some circumstances; Liu et al. 2006, Nie et al. 2014b), δ13C (Liu et al. 2006, 2013), and 87Sr/86Sr ratios (Sun et al. 2005). Geochemical proxies have been applied at a local scale (to ornithogenic sediments, i.e. those that form on the site of a breeding colony; e.g., Nie et al, 2014a) and at a catchment scale (to sediments from lakes near breeding colonies; Liu et al. 2011). Recently, much focus has been placed on using geochemical proxies to understand Holocene penguin population dynamics in Antarctica (Sun et al. 2005, Liu et al. 2006b, 2007, Huang et al. 2009, 2011), but they have also been used successfully in Arctic (Brimble et al. 2009, Keatley et al. 2011) and low-latitude sites (Liu et al. 2006a). Once normalized to account for terrestrial inputs, changes in the concentrations of these elements within sediments through time appear to accurately reflect local seabird population trends, which in turn can be correlated with past changes in the environment, such as climate (Liu et al. 2007, Huang et al. 2009, 2011) or sea surface temperatures (Liu et al. 2006a). In addition to sediments, stable isotope analyses can also be performed on avian remains themselves, and this is described in a following section.

Biological proxies, such as fungal spores (Wood et al. 2011), sedimentary aDNA (Willerslev et al. 2003, Haile et al. 2007, Epp et al. 2012), and other biomolecules (e.g., cholesterol and cholestanol; Huang et al. 2010), have also undergone major development this century, and are becoming routinely used tools. Unlike geochemical proxies, their use is not limited to marine birds. One of these biological proxies, coprophilous fungal spores, is an example of a preexisting proxy that has recently been adapted for use in paleornithology. The fungal genus Sporormiella, in particular, lives almost exclusively on herbivore dung and produces robust, morphologically distinctive spores that preserve in sediments. Since the 1980s, Sporormiella spores in sediment cores have been quantified to examine the timing of Pleistocene and Holocene extinction events in mammalian-dominated faunas, such as those of North America (Davis 1987, Robinson et al. 2005, Gill et al. 2009), Australia (Rule et al. 2012), and Madagascar (Burney et al. 2003). However, Wood et al. (2011) showed that Sporormiella spores could also be found in sediments on islands with avian-dominated faunas, and therefore were a useful proxy for prehistoric changes in herbivorous bird populations. The benefit of a stratigraphic approach such as this is that it allows changes in avian herbivore abundance to be directly compared with concomitant changes in other proxies (such as pollen, reflecting the local vegetation, or charcoal abundance, reflecting fires; e.g., Rule et al. 2012) without the need for absolute dating. Future work, potentially involving a combination of spore morphology and aDNA, may resolve vertebrate-taxon-specific species of Sporormiella, thereby allowing populations of mammals and birds to be independently traced on landmasses where they co-occur.

With new developments in high-throughput sequencing technologies, ancient DNA analysis of Pleistocene and Holocene sediments is likely to become an increasingly powerful tool for detecting the former presence of avian species when no macrofossils are preserved. Typically, a ‘barcoding' approach is used, whereby short, variable (i.e. taxonomically informative) sequences are amplified from a sediment-DNA extract using PCR primers specific to birds (e.g., Epp et al. 2012). Willerslev et al. (2003) presented one of the earliest studies to use avian primers on sedimentary aDNA, detecting the DNA of three extinct moa species and a parakeet in Holocene rock shelter sediments from New Zealand. Haile et al. (2007) also successfully obtained ancient bird DNA by using avian-specific primers on sediments from a New Zealand rock shelter, but also highlighted a potentially complicating factor associated with this proxy, that of vertical DNA leaching through sediment layers; e.g., sheep (Ovis aries) DNA was recovered from sediments thousands of years older than the time of their introduction to New Zealand. Further research into the dynamics of DNA leaching would greatly improve the utility of sedimentary aDNA as a proxy for birds in temperate, wet sites. Although there is some evidence to suggest that leaching may be less of an issue in sites with dry (e.g., Willerslev et al. 2003) or permanently frozen soils (e.g., Epp et al. 2012), there is still some potential for leaching in these areas via mammals urinating at a site. Beyond avian-specific primers, we can see future potential for the development of new soil DNA markers of avian presence. Examples may include detection of aDNA from coprophilous fungi related to birds (as discussed above) or in bacterial taxa and/or communities in sediments associated with birds (e.g., Aislabie et al. 2009).

It is also worth noting that, in some instances, avian remains themselves can be used as proxies for the ancient environmental conditions in which the birds lived. Isotopic analyses of preserved tissues, such as bones and feathers, and eggshell fragments have provided insights into past dietary or habitat shifts of certain bird taxa, reflecting changing climatic conditions (Johnson et al. 1999, Segalen et al. 2002, Emslie and Patterson 2007, Lorenzini et al. 2010, Rawlence et al. 2012, Huang et al. 2013, Yanes et al. 2013). Mercury levels in ancient eggshell, and copper in seabird excrement, have been used as proxies for anthropogenic activities such as industrialization and smelting (Yan et al. 2010, Xu et al. 2011).

Stable Isotope Analyses

Stable isotope analyses of faunal tissues have been used extensively for several decades, in modern biology and ecology, archaeology, and paleontology. A large number of reviews and textbooks exist on the use of stable isotopes in these fields (e.g., Kelly 2000, Katzenberg 2007, Clementz 2012), as well as for modern bird ecology (Inger and Bearhop 2008), and so we refer readers interested in the background of the methods and assumptions used to these texts. With regard to their relevance to paleornithology, stable isotopes in soils and sediments can serve as indicators for the former location of bird colonies, as discussed in the previous section on ‘Sedimentary Proxies for Birds.' However, the stable isotope composition of actual fossil remains, such as bones and eggshells, can also provide useful insights into the diet, biology, environment, and habitat preferences of ancient birds. Therefore, isotope analyses can provide one of the few ways to trace behavioral changes through the fossil record (Lister 2014). Proteins and minerals are the two main sources of stable isotopes in fossil remains that are frequently analyzed. The isotopic analysis of proteins, such as collagen, is mostly applicable to samples that are <100 ka in age (or older if preservation is remarkable), whereas isotopic analysis of minerals such as calcite or bioapatite can be applied to much older fossil remains (Clementz 2012). The isotopic composition in each of these sources can be affected by contamination or postburial modification, so several tests have been developed to ensure the reliability of samples being analyzed (Kohn and Cerling 2002, Clementz 2012).

While stable isotope analyses have been applied widely in mammalian paleontology, the application of isotopic techniques to the study of fossil birds has been more limited. In fossil mammals, tooth enamel is most often used in isotope studies, as its composition of dense, large apatite crystals with relatively low organic content lessens the potential for diagenetic modification (Blyth 2011). The inorganic fraction of bird bones is likely less stable than that of mammalian tooth enamel (Steadman 2005), and therefore the isotopic composition of bird fossils may be more prone to contamination and modification. Accordingly, most fossil avian isotope studies have been performed on geologically young (i.e. Pleistocene or Holocene) material, or on relatively stable substrates such as eggshell. For example, Clarke et al. (2006) examined isotopic values for Late-Quaternary eggshells of elephant birds (Aeypyornis sp.) and demonstrated that these birds mainly browsed C3 vegetation and utilized drinking water from groundwater-fed wetlands. Wiley et al. (2013) analyzed carbon and nitrogen isotopes in Late-Holocene bones of the Hawaiian Petrel (Pterodroma sandwichensis) to show that prolonged dietary stability within this species had been disrupted by a relatively recent trophic decline related to the fishing industry.

However, there are a few examples of isotopic studies that were performed on older remains. For example, Angst et al. (2014) used δ13C values of Early Cenozoic Gastornis eggshell and bone apatite to infer an herbivorous diet for these large birds, and Patnaik et al. (2009) used δ13C of Miocene ratite eggshells to infer that these birds had a diet of mainly C3 plants. These examples show that, given the right preservation conditions, the original isotopic composition of fossilized bird remains may be preserved. However, the overall proportion of avian fossil remains that preserve their original isotopic composition, and the prevalence of situations in which this occurs, remain to be determined.

Clementz (2012) highlighted several areas in which new techniques and methodological advances in isotopic analyses are currently being applied to the study of fossil mammals, however these also have potential future applications for the study of fossil birds. The first of these, laser ablation, has only recently been applied in paleontology (Clementz 2012), but provides isotopic analyses using only minute amounts of material (producing holes a fraction of a mm in diameter). This is useful for rare or small fossil specimens. In addition, it allows linear sampling across a specimen at fine spatial scales (e.g., Benson et al. 2013). One possible application of this technique may be to explore aspects of seasonality, such as migration, in extinct or fossil birds that retain multiple cyclical cortical growth marks (e.g., moa; Turvey et al. 2005). Another of the recent advances discussed by Clementz (2012) is the development of analyses of clumped isotopes, which have proven to be accurate body thermometers for both living and fossil species (Eagle et al. 2010).

Coprolite Analyses

The analysis of coprolites (ancient dung) is not strictly a single technique. It usually requires a multidisciplinary approach, including several of the techniques mentioned above. However, it is of relevance to the scope of this paper, as avian ‘coproecology' has undergone major advances within the past decade (due largely to progress in the field of aDNA research), and can now provide detailed insights into the past diets, ecological functions, parasites, and gut microbiotas of birds that are unattainable by other methods. Such information can have important implications for the restoration of broken ecological links, and for understanding the ecology of rare or threatened bird species (Wood et al. 2012).

The development of aDNA research has been a key factor in allowing the bird species that deposited a coprolite to be identified. Prior to this, coprolites were often assigned to species based on their size, shape, collection locality, and associated osteological remains (e.g., James and Burney 1997, Horrocks et al. 2004). However, aDNA analyses have revealed that avian coprolite deposits can often contain specimens from multiple species, and that these cannot always be distinguished based on size and shape (Wood and Wilmshurst 2014). The ability to assign coprolites to bird species with a high degree of certainty has allowed the diets of these species (which may be determined using aDNA or conventional microscopic analyses of coprolite content) to be compared and contrasted, providing the potential to study the structure of prehistoric avian communities (Wood et al. 2013a).

Coprolites also provide excellent records of the prehistoric parasite faunas (especially gastrointestinal parasites) associated with birds. Although the parasites can be studied using conventional microscopic techniques, aDNA analysis has provided the ability to identify them with increased taxonomic resolution, as well as a way to identify parasites that are less readily preserved or difficult to identify visually (Wood et al. 2013b). The study of parasite communities using the coprolites of rare or threatened bird species may provide interesting insights into how the parasite communities of a species changed through time and how they responded as their hosts declined in abundance and populations became fragmented, and may reveal parallel extinctions for different endemic lineages (Wood et al. 2013b).

There is an ever-increasing awareness about the important role that microbiotas (including parasites, but especially bacterial communities) can play in nutrition, metabolism, the immune system, and reducing the risk of certain diseases (Lee and Mazmanian 2010, Tlaskalová-Hogenová et al. 2011, Flint et al. 2012). Gastrointestinal microbiotas are readily characterized using molecular analysis of dung, including those of birds (e.g., Waite et al. 2012, Waite and Taylor 2014). Characterizing microbiotas from coprolites could therefore potentially provide insights into the natural microbiotas associated with species that, due to their extreme rarity, now exist only in intensively managed populations. Individuals, and indeed whole populations, of such species (e.g., the New Zealand Kakapo [Strigops habroptilus]) may have significantly altered microbiotas due to hand-rearing or the administration of antibiotics (Waite et al. 2012, 2014), and coprolites could be key to providing baseline information that could, in future, be used to help to restore natural microbial communities (and therefore the health benefits that they provide) in these birds.

From an ecological perspective, coprolites provide an important window into the interactions among species within ancient ecosystems. This can have direct implications for living birds. For example, pollen from the bizarre subterranean root-parasite plant Dactylanthus taylorii was recently discovered in the coprolite of a Kakapo, providing evidence for a former link between two species that, due to population declines and range contractions, no longer co-occur (Wood et al. 2012). Understanding such links is an important part of ecosystem restoration, and is part of the developing practice of ‘conservation paleobiology,' which focuses on using evidence from the past to inform current conservation management (Dietl and Flessa 2011).

High-Resolution Computed Tomography

Following the trend for other groups of vertebrates (e.g., Donoghue et al. 2006, Wu and Schepartz 2009, Schilling et al. 2013), new descriptions and redescriptions of fossil birds are beginning to incorporate data obtained from high-resolution computed tomography (CT) scanning of specimens, as well as details of bone microstructure and histological descriptions (e.g., Clarke et al. 2005, de Ricqlès 2011, Houssaye 2014). Both X-ray tube–based high-resolution CT systems and synchrotron radiation source μCT imaging are widely used in paleontological research, and their applications are numerous. Medical CT scanning is still popular, particularly for large specimens, but, despite the resolution of commercial scanners having improved, it remains of limited use in resolving very small structures in detail (e.g., Wu and Schepartz 2009). The three-dimensional information obtained from CT data allows for an integral examination of specimens, fossil and extant, in a nondestructive manner, enabling the visualization of slices in sectional views (to a few microns) and revealing internal structures in astounding detail.

The insights into various aspects of the ecology and paleobiology of extinct taxa gained from surveying the internal structures of fossil birds, at the micro- and macro-anatomical level, are tightly linked to our understanding of the biological processes, morphology, and phylogenetic relationships of living birds. The implementation of these techniques in avian paleobiology ultimately allows for the reconstruction of fossil birds as biological entities, and therefore these techniques are becoming more and more attractive for paleornithologists.

Applications of CT in paleoneurology.

One of the most common uses for the volumetric information obtained from CT data is the virtual rendering of internal structures that are not preserved in fossil specimens, such as nervous tissue and blood vessels. In the past, the anatomy of the brain of fossil birds could only be examined with rarely preserved natural endocasts (i.e. where sediment replaced the neural tissue and filled up the neurocranium, forming a natural cast), or with plaster casts of the endocranial cavity (Edinger 1928), which is a partially destructive technique. Now, however, it is possible to virtually reconstruct the brain and sensory organs accurately through 3D imaging techniques (Figure 2). As with the preparation of plaster endocasts, this is possible because, in birds, the brain fills almost the entire cranial cavity, so that the braincase closely conforms to the shape of the brain (Iwaniuk and Nelson 2002). Virtual endocasts therefore represent a satisfactory record of the morphology and size of the organ (Witmer et al. 2008).


Coronal slice through the skull of the Late Oligocene–Early Miocene gull-like or tern-like charadriiform Laricola elegans, obtained by high-resolution CT scanning. Left side shows the reconstruction of the inner ear. Abbreviations: asc, anterior semicircular canal; c, cochlea; CC, cranial cavity; f, frontal bone; hsc, horizontal semicircular canal; psc, posterior semicircular canal; S, sediment. Image courtesy of P. Scofield.


Paleoneurology is the study of brain evolution in fossil taxa. Avian (paleo)-neurological research is centered around the question of whether evolutionary changes, in the form of adaptations to a specific mode of life, are reflected in the avian brain, and, if so, what patterns can be identified across higher-level taxa, and what level of variation is identifiable at lower taxonomic levels. Behavior and sensory ecology can have profound effects in shaping the brain structure of birds (e.g., Winkler et al. 2004, Smith and Clarke 2012), but the presence of a phylogenetic signal in brain volume and morphology has also been examined in other vertebrates (e.g., Rojas et al. 2013, Racicot and Rowe 2014). So far, research within this field has been mostly aimed at understanding the early stages of brain evolution in different groups of vertebrates, and emphasis has been placed on taxonomic groups that are central to answering key evolutionary questions (e.g., Domínguez Alonso et al. 2004). Studies within Neornithes are fewer than those in other vertebrates, the greatest limitations being the restricted availability of well-preserved fossil cranial material, and a lack of extensive sampling of comparative material of extant taxa.

Virtual reconstructions of sensory and neural structures, such as the inner ear, optic nerve, and olfactory bulb, have provided information on the sensory capabilities of living and extinct birds (e.g., Sipla 2007, Walsh et al. 2009, Walsh and Milner 2011, Zelenitsky et al. 2011, Walsh et al. 2014, Degrange et al. in press). For instance, it has been shown through correlations with known hearing sensitivity in living birds that the dimensions of the cochlear duct are likely to predict mean hearing frequency and range in fossil taxa, and that these measurements can potentially be used to predict social and vocalization complexity, as well as habitat selection (Walsh et al. 2009). Predictions of sensory capabilities have been obtained for some Late Paleocene and Early Eocene (ca. 60–50 Ma) birds (Walsh et al. 2009, Walsh and Milner 2011, Zelenitsky et al. 2011), but more data from extant species is required to explore these relationships in further detail. However, it is worth noting that data from living taxa is gradually being made available in recent studies on avian endocranial anatomy (e.g., Ksepka et al. 2012, Smith and Clarke 2012, Kawabe et al. 2013).

Inferring the behavior of an extinct bird based on brain morphology is not always straightforward. An understanding of the relationship between behavior and neural function, gleaned from observations of living taxa, is pivotal for neuroanatomical research to assist in the prediction of behavior in extinct birds. However, this is only possible if differences in neural function are causally related to perceptible changes in the volume and morphology of certain regions of the brain (Walsh et al. 2013). It has been reported, for instance, that the relative size of the cerebellar flocculus, a structure that processes reflexes involved in gaze stabilization, is not (contrary to previous hypotheses) a reliable indicator of the flying ability of extant birds (Walsh et al. 2013). Similarly, encephalization quotients in birds (the ratio of actual to expected brain size for an animal of a given body size; Kawabe et al. 2013) have been linked to environmental adaptability and certain life-history traits, but results obtained from studies of some neornithine clades, some of which have included fossil taxa, have not been able to explain these observations (Scofield and Ashwell 2009, Smith and Clarke 2012).

The study of brain and sensory organ evolution in extinct avian taxa within Neornithes is obviously tightly linked to our understanding of brain morphology and neural function in living birds. For this reason, recent research has focused on ecological, behavioral, and phylogenetic aspects of brain morphology in the context of a broad taxonomic sampling of extant forms, although few clades have been looked at (Ashwell and Scofield 2008, Scofield and Ashwell 2009, Ksepka et al. 2012, Smith and Clarke 2012, Kawabe et al. 2014, Paulina-Carabajal et al. 2014, Tambussi et al. in press). These studies appear to indicate that a phylogenetic signal in brain morphology, especially at lower taxonomic levels, may be lost to homoplasy. Furthermore, the amount of neuroanatomical variation at different taxonomic levels (including intraspecific variation) has not been ascertained for most groups within Neornithes.

Finite Element Analysis

Originally developed as an engineering tool, finite element analysis (FEA) is one technique used in biomechanical modeling to understand the functions of complex morphological features (Young et al. 2012). The FEA approach allows the visualization and modeling of stress and strain distributions within complex and irregular shapes, such as animal skeletons, by subdividing the object into a mesh of plates, bricks, elements, and nodes, so as to approximate the complex structure with an object of simpler geometry (e.g., Rayfield 2007). This method, which is based on 3D models, has been applied with increasing frequency in vertebrate paleontology (e.g., Rayfield 2005, Tseng 2009, Young et al. 2012) to predict the mechanical behavior of fossilized biological structures under varying simulated conditions of loading profiles and magnitudes (Figure 3). The interpretation of results often relies on correlating the intensity of areas of functional stress, strain, and/or deformation with morphological features, with the purpose of assessing functionality and inferring aspects of the paleobiology of the extinct taxon (Wroe 2008, Oldfield et al. 2012, Young et al. 2012, Wroe et al. 2013, Attard et al. 2014), thus establishing a relationship between form and function.


Stress distribution of a Finite Element model applied to the skull of the phorusrhacid Andalgalornis steulleti under lateral shake load simulation. Abbreviations: VM, Von Misels; MPa, mega pascals. White areas represent stress loads greater than 2 MPa. Image courtesy of F. Degrange.


Most studies of vertebrate paleontology that have used FEA have focused on the biomechanics of the skull (e.g., Tseng 2009, Oldfield et al. 2012, Young et al. 2012). Cranial biomechanical modeling, in combination with knowledge of morphology (i.e. bone thickness, muscle organization; e.g., Tambussi et al. 2012) and bite force analysis (e.g., Wroe et al. 2005), represents an interesting prospect for assessing the functional adaptations of extinct taxa in terms of feeding ecology and predatory behavior (e.g., Oldfield et al. 2012). However, in the absence of validation studies based on extant taxa, results obtained from FEA methods can only be used in a comparative context (i.e. changes in shape as functional adaptations), rather than in an absolute numerical context (see Bright and Rayfield 2011, Bright 2014). This is because a number of initial conditions that need to be specified in the model, such as the material properties of the skull, may be unknown for a fossil taxon (Bright 2014, but see also Degrange and Tambussi 2009).

Functional analyses based on FEA focusing on living taxa within Neornithes are few (e.g., Degrange et al. 2010, Soons et al. 2010, 2012, Rayfield 2011). Regarding extinct representatives of Neornithes, at present, the phorusrhacid Andalgalornis steulleti (Kraglievich 1931) and the New Zealand moa are the only fossil birds for which FEA has been applied to the skull (Degrange et al. 2010, Attard et al. 2014). Phorusrhacids, or ‘terror birds,' were giant, predatory, flightless birds that inhabited predominantly South America from reportedly the Late Paleocene (ca. 62–59 Ma) to the Late Pleistocene (<0.5 Ma; Mayr 2009, Alvarenga et al. 2010), although both the youngest and oldest records have been challenged (Agnolin 2013, Tambussi and Degrange 2013). FEA indicates that the skull of Andalgalornis steulleti (Figure 3) was best adapted to endure dorsoventral (i.e. sagittal) and rostrocaudal (i.e. as in ‘pullback' motions) loadings, but displayed high stress when lateral loadings were applied (Degrange et al. 2010). This suggests that A. steulleti was unlikely to engage in behavior that required lateral head shaking (as for subduing large, struggling prey), and was therefore more likely to consume small prey or to administer repeated, targeted sagittal strikes with the beak. The loss of cranial kinesis in phorusrhacid birds, which contributes to enhanced craniofacial rigidity, further explains the reduced stress capacity during sagittal loading (Degrange et al. 2010).

Although the paucity of cranial material from modern birds preserved in the fossil record may somewhat explain the limited number of functional analyses based on FEA for Neornithes, using this method to infer the paleobiology of extinct birds that do not differ considerably in morphology from modern representatives of their lineages, and therefore presumably in feeding strategy, may prove impractical. For that reason, FEA is probably better suited to elucidating the ecology and behavior of ‘odd' taxa, especially when this information cannot be inferred with confidence otherwise. Within Neornithes, the unusual cranial morphology of the adzebills (Aptornithidae) makes these birds likely candidates for this approach. Lastly, it is also important to note that paleoecological conclusions drawn from FEA and other forms of biomechanical modeling of the skull (e.g., Witmer and Rose 1991) should not ignore the overall morphology of the taxon when this information is available.


Another area of vertebrate paleontology to have benefited from recent technological advances is paleohistology: the study of the microanatomical organization of mineralized tissue (mostly bone, but also calcified cartilage, dentine, and enamel) in fossil organisms (e.g., Houssaye 2014). Progress made within this field over the past 80 years has been outlined by de Ricqlès (2011) and Padian (2011). This discipline relies on comparative histology with extant taxa to infer a correlation between bone microstructure and various biological traits of fossil taxa (paleobiology), such as rates of growth, physiology, and functional morphology (e.g., Houssaye 2014, Wilson and Chin 2014).

Currently, 3D virtual imaging complements traditional histological techniques (i.e. preparation of thin sections that are observed in either ordinary or polarized light; e.g., Padian and Lamm 2013), producing virtual tomographic slices that offer a 3D rendering of structures without the need for destructive sampling (i.e. serial sectioning) of specimens (de Ricqlès 2011). New developments within this field also encompass advances in computer science and statistical methods that aid in discerning the different signals present in microanatomy and histology (Cubo et al. 2008, de Ricqlès 2011 and references therein, Legendre et al. 2013). This is because the structure of bone tissue is constrained by a range of different factors, including ontogeny, phylogeny, mechanical adaptations to a specific mode of life, and the environment (Padian 2011, Padian and Lamm 2013), all of which have been investigated in some groups of fossil birds and their living relatives. Despite the potential benefits of this approach, there are currently few studies that have used paleohistology to elucidate ecological and biological aspects of fossil taxa within Neornithes.

Life-history traits of extinct bird taxa can be inferred from paleohistological data. It has been shown, for instance, that some species of moa attained skeletal maturity at ~10 yr, suggesting a K-selected life-history strategy that is not uncommon in insular environments (Turvey et al. 2005; see also Chinsamy et al. 2014). Cortical bones of most species of moa display lines of arrested growth (LAGs; Figure 4), which reflect decreased rates of growth in response to seasonal periodicity before an individual reaches skeletal maturity (Turvey et al. 2005). Although LAGs have been reported for a few neornithine birds (Bourdon et al. 2009), with the exception of kiwi (Apteryx spp.) this condition is absent in other ratites (Bourdon et al. 2009), and indeed in most other ornithurine birds as well, such as the Mesozoic Hesperornis and Ichthyornis, and the early-diverging neornithine bird Vegavis iaai (e.g., Chinsamy et al. 1998, de Ricqles et al. 2001, Clarke et al. 2005, Bourdon et al. 2009). This is because, as evidenced in extant birds, maturity is reached within 1 yr, i.e. too quickly for annual growth marks to be deposited in the bone cortex (Turvey et al. 2005).


Transverse section of the left femur of the moa Dinornis robustus (MNHN Av. 8470), showing a line of arrested growth (LAG). Image courtesy of L. Legendre.


A further recent example of how paleohistology may provide information on life-history traits, and also on evolutionary development in extinct birds, was reported for the so-called ‘bony-toothed birds' (Odontopterygiformes), an extinct group of marine birds of uncertain affinities known from the latest Paleocene to the Plio-Pleistocene (ca. 56.0–2.6 Ma; Owen 1873, Mayr 2009, 2011). On the basis of histological thin slices and X-ray microtomography, Louchart et al. (2013; but see also Howard 1957) evaluated hypotheses on how the pseudoteeth (bony excrescences of the jaw that give the group their name) developed in the Plio-Pleistocene Pelagornis mauretanicus. The high degree of vascularization and the parallel-fibred tissue forming the walls of the hollow teeth seem to have posed a functional constraint (i.e. risk of hemorrhage and breakage), which, in addition to the absence of wear observed on the teeth, suggests that these structures must have been covered by a rhamphotheca in life. The rhamphotheca could only have become hardened after growth of the teeth was complete, indicating that this taxon must have been altricial (Louchart et al. 2013).

Histological comparisons of fossil and extant taxa have been performed on a limited number of other neornithine lineages. Smith and Clarke (2014) analyzed bone microstructure in fossil wing-propelled diving charadriiforms (Alcidae) to assess microstructural variation within the group and compared with other taxa. As expected, the cortical thickness of some bones differed from that of the closely related Long-tailed Skua (Stercorarius longicaudus: Stercorariidae), and the wall thickness of limb bones varied between volant and nonvolant alcid species. It is therefore possible to discern volant from flightless wing-propelled divers based on fragmentary fossil remains (Smith and Clarke 2014). In an example of how microhistology can also disclose the evolution of physical appearance in bird groups, Clarke et al. (2010) examined melanosomes preserved within a giant fossil penguin from Peru to show that the plumage was likely gray or reddish brown.

It is also noteworthy that the amount of histological variation at different taxonomic ranks, especially at the intra- and inter-specific level, has not been ascertained for most lineages of living birds. Microanatomical variation in the compactness of the internal architecture of the bone at the interspecific level has been documented for Eocene penguins from Antarctica (Cerda et al. 2014), in which larger taxa had more massive bones, which is likely to be due to mechanical (larger taxa need more compact bones) or functional (variations in diving behavior) factors. However, the overall paucity of studies dealing with variation at different taxonomic levels makes it difficult to assess the phylogenetic distribution of histological characters. It has been noted that the separation of the phylogenetic component that influences bone microstructure from ontogenic, biomechanical, and environmental signals may prove difficult because these are often linked to phylogeny (Padian and Lamm 2013). Legendre et al. (2014), however, in a study that included the extinct moa and elephant birds, showed that bone size and bone vascular density carry a strong phylogenetic signal within the clade of palaeognathous birds (Palaeognathae). Although a phylogenetic signal of some features has been found to be relevant at higher taxonomic ranks within amniotes (Cubo et al. 2008), it remains to be tested whether this is consistent at lower taxonomic levels (e.g., family-level taxa).

Presently, the implementation of paleohistological techniques on fossil neornithine birds is constrained by the monumental task of assembling comparative data from extant taxa, in order to provide a biological context for making inferences about the paleobiology of fossil taxa. Application of these new methods to a larger number of extant species would help to determine which constraints act on mineralized tissues, and would therefore allow for a more detailed understanding of the paleobiology of fossil birds (Houssaye 2014).

Future Prospects

As the above examples show, the field of paleornithology is experiencing a period of rapid technological and methodological development at the beginning of the 21st century. This is largely being driven by the adoption of techniques developed in other fields for application to fossil remains. If this trend continues, then the future is bright with respect to the amount of new data that will be retrievable from fossil bird remains over the next few decades, and the degree to which this will inform us about living birds. As with most biological sciences, paleornithology is now entering an era of ‘big data.'

However, it is important to acknowledge the caveats associated with many of these newly developed techniques. In particular, most (excluding CT imaging) are destructive. Although the amount of material required for different analyses has tended to decrease as techniques are refined, preference should be given in the meantime to the preservation of morphologically important features of fossil bones. This is perhaps less crucial for large fossils (e.g., moa leg bones), where much more material is available for destructive analyses, than for small specimens. We should also not lose sight of the importance of traditional approaches, as the new techniques should only serve to complement, not replace, these. For example, the combination of new genetic techniques and traditional morphological analyses can provide increased resolution around the evolutionary history of extant lineages than either would provide alone (e.g., Mitchell et al. 2014b). Moreover, many of the techniques described in this paper are relevant only to geologically young or relatively complete fossil specimens, and so morphology-based studies will always be key to paleornithology.

It is also essential to acknowledge the vital role of museum and palaeontology department collections as repositories of specimens for continued study. As new analytical methods become available, the ability to apply them to fossils that have previously been analyzed using different methods provides increased scientific value to these specimens.

Additionally, it is worth noting that fieldwork, exploration, and the discovery of new fossil specimens on which to use these techniques remain vital to the field of paleornithology. For example, since the year 2000, remarkable new fossil discoveries have been key to shedding new light on, among other things, the origins of birds (Zhou and Zhang 2007, Feduccia 2013), the diets of ancient birds (e.g., Mayr 2004), the evolution of avian digestive tracts (e.g., Zheng et al. 2011), the origins of plant–bird mutualisms (e.g., Mayr and Wilde 2014), and the evolution of behavior and nesting strategies (Naish 2014). However, such exploratory work can often be difficult to fund. With many major science-funding bodies around the world anecdotally shifting more toward funding projects with a high chance of guaranteed results, as well as more applied (end user–relevant) research, the number of avenues available for funding fieldwork or exploratory (proof-of-concept) projects appear to be diminishing. However, some sources do still exist, through organizations such as National Geographic, or even new initiatives such as crowd-sourcing sites (e.g., or

As regards the potential for increased linkages between paleornithology and ornithology in the future, we also see several ways in which this can be nurtured. Although there are some key philosophical differences in the approaches of disciplines focused on historical (e.g., paleornithology) and modern (e.g., ornithology) organisms—the latter are classically driven by empirical testing of a priori hypotheses, whereas the former rely heavily on the discovery and description of specimens and the generation of a posteriori hypotheses to explain them—technological and methodological advances continue to close the gaps by enabling greater analytical and quantitative power in the study of ancient remains and the ability to answer more targeted questions about fossil remains (e.g., regarding diets, breeding biology, and phylogenetic relationships). The incorporation of evolutionary- or paleontological-focused symposia at ornithological conferences is also a means by which the two fields can foster integration and increased collaboration. An excellent example of this was achieved at the last (2014) International Ornithological Congress, where 14 of the 48 session themes (29%) focused on aspects of evolutionary history, phylogeographic history, and palaeontology.

There are also likely to be more practical linkages between the past and the present that could be promoted in the future. One way in which paleornithology (at least at the more recent end of its temporal spectrum) could be useful in more applied situations is through the increased implementation of conservation paleobiology, particularly in guiding the restoration of the natural roles of lost birds in ecosystems. To some extent this is already being undertaken on some islands, for example, in Hawaii, where grazing tortoises are being used as ecological surrogates for the extinct flightless moa nalos (Chelychelynechen, Thambetochen, and Ptaiochen; Hansen 2010). However, with the current rate of advances in the field of paleornithology, it may not be too long before extinct species are able to be resurrected, and rock hammers can be replaced by binoculars!


We thank F. Degrange, L. Legendre, P. Scofield, J. M. Wilmshurst, and T. H. Worthy for helpful discussions and comments on this manuscript, or for supplying figures.


  1. F. Agnolin (2013). La posición sistemática de Hermosiornis (Aves, Phororhacoidea) y sus implicancias filogenéticas. Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales nueva serie 15:39–60. Google Scholar
  2. Z. Aidala, L. Huynen P. L. R. Brennan J. Musser A. Fidler N. Chong G. E. Machovsky Capuska M. G. Anderson A. Talaba D. Lambertand M. E. Hauber (2012). Ultraviolet visual sensitivity in three avian lineages: Paleognaths, parrots, and passerines. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 198:495–510. Google Scholar
  3. J. Aislabie, S. Jordan J. Ayton J. L. Klassen G. M. Barkerand S. Turner (2009). Bacterial diversity associated with ornithogenic soil of the Ross Sea region, Antarctica. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 55:21–36. Google Scholar
  4. M. E. Allentoft, and N. J. Rawlence (2012). Moa's Ark or volant ghosts of Gondwana? Insights from nineteen years of ancient DNA research on the extinct moa (Aves: Dinornithiformes) of New Zealand. Annals of Anatomy 194:36–51. Google Scholar
  5. M. E. Allentoft, M. Collins D. Harker J. Haile C. L. Oskam M. L. Hale P. F. Campos J. A. Samaniego M. T. P. Gilbert E. Willerslev G. Zhang et al . (2012). The half-life of DNA in bone: Measuring decay kinetics in 158 dated fossils. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 279:4724–4733. Google Scholar
  6. M. E. Allentoft, R. Heller C. L. Oskam E. D. Lorenzen M. L. Hale M. T. P. Gilbert C. Jacomb R. N. Holdawayand M. Bunce (2014). Extinct New Zealand megafauna were not in decline before human colonization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 111:4922–4927. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1314972111 Google Scholar
  7. M. E. Allentoft, S. C. Schuster R. N. Holdaway M. L. Hale E. McLay C. Oskam M. T. P. Gilbert P. Spencer E. Willerslevand M. Bunce (2009). Identification of microsatellites from an extinct moa species using high-throughput (454) sequence data. BioTechniques 46:195–200. Google Scholar
  8. H. Alvarenga, W. Jonesand A. Rinderknecht (2010). The youngest record of phorusrhacid birds (Aves, Phorusrhacidae) from the late Pleistocene of Uruguay. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie-Abhandlungen 256:229–234. Google Scholar
  9. D. Angst, C. Lécuyer R. Amiot E. Buffetaut F. Fourel F. Martineau S. Legendre A. Abourachidand A. Herrel (2014). Isotopic and anatomical evidence of an herbivorous diet in the early Tertiary giant bird Gastornis: Implications for the structure of Paleocene terrestrial ecosystems. Naturwissenschaften 101:313–322. Google Scholar
  10. K. W. S. Ashwell, and R. P. Scofield (2008). Big birds and their brains: Paleoneurology of the New Zealand moa. Brain, Behavior and Evolution 71:151–306. Google Scholar
  11. M. R. G. Attard, W. C. H. Parr L. A. B. Wilson M. Archer S. J. Hand T. L. Rogersand S. Wroe (2014). Virtual reconstruction and prey size preference in the mid Cenozoic Thylacinid, Nimbacinus dicksoni (Thylacinidae, Marsupialia). PLOS One 9:e93088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093088 Google Scholar
  12. J. J. Austin, A. B. Smithand R. H. Thomas (1997). Palaeontology in a molecular world: The search for authentic ancient DNA. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 12:303–306. Google Scholar
  13. A. Benson, L. Kinsley M. Willmes A. Defleur H. Kokkonen M. Mussiand R. Grün (2013). Laser ablation depth profiling of U-series and Sr isotopes in human fossils. Journal of Archaeological Science 40:2991–3000. Google Scholar
  14. S. Bertelli, and N. P. Giannini (2005). A phylogeny of extant penguins (Aves: Spheniciformes) combining morphology and mitochondrial sequences. Cladistics 21:209–239. Google Scholar
  15. P. Bircham (2007). A History of Ornithology. Collins, London. Google Scholar
  16. L. Blyth (2011). Oxygen isotope analysis and tooth enamel phosphate and its application to archaeology. Totem: The University of Western Ontario Journal of Anthropology 9:Issue 1, Article 2. Google Scholar
  17. E. Bourdon, J. Castanet A. de Ricqlès R. P. Scofield A. J. D Tennyson H. Lamrousand J. Cubo (2009). Bone growth marks reveal protracted growth in New Zealand kiwi (Aves, Apterygidae). Biology Letters 5:639–642. Google Scholar
  18. J. L. Bouzat, H. A. Lewinand K. N. Paige (1998). The ghost of genetic diversity past: Historical DNA analysis of the Greater Prairie Chicken. The American Naturalist 152:1–6. Google Scholar
  19. J. A. Bright (2014). A review of paleontological finite element models and their validity. Journal of Paleontology 88:760–769. Google Scholar
  20. J. A. Bright, and E. J. Rayfield (2011). Sensitivity and ex vivo validation of finite element models of the domestic pig cranium. Journal of Anatomy 219:456–471. Google Scholar
  21. S. K. Brimble, J. M. Blais L. E. Kimpe M. L. Mallory B. E. Keatley M. S. V. Douglasand J. P. Smol (2009). Bioenrichment of trace elements in a series of ponds near a Northern Fulmar (Fulmarus glacialis) colony at Cape Vera, Devon Island. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 66:949–958. Google Scholar
  22. M. Buckley, and M. J. Collins (2011). Collagen survival and its use for species identification in Holocene–lower Pleistocene bone fragments from British archaeological and palaeontological sites. Antiqua 1:e1. Google Scholar
  23. M. Bunce, T. H. Worthy T. Ford W. Hoppitt E. Willerslev A. Drummondand A. Cooper (2003). Extreme reversed sexual size dimorphism in the extinct New Zealand moa Dinornis. Nature 425:172–175. Google Scholar
  24. D. A. Burney, G. Robinsonand L. P. Burney (2003). Sporormiella and the late Holocene extinctions in Madagascar. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100:10800–10805. Google Scholar
  25. R. J. Cano, H. Poinarand G. O. Poinar Jr (1992). Isolation and partial characterisation of DNA from the bee Proplebeia dominicana (Apidae: Hymenoptera) in 25–40 million year old amber. Medical Science Research 20:249–251. Google Scholar
  26. N. F. Carlin, I. Wurmanand T. Zakim (2014). How to permit your mammoth: Some legal implications of “de-extinction.” Stanford Environmental Law Journal 33:3–57. Google Scholar
  27. I. A. Cerda, C. P. Tambussiand F. J. Degrange (2014). Unexpected microanatomical variation among Eocene Antarctic stem penguins (Aves: Sphenisciformes). Historical Biology. doi: 10.1080/08912963.2014.896907 Google Scholar
  28. Y. L. Chan, E. A. Lacey O. P. Pearsonand E. A. Hadly (2005). Ancient DNA reveals Holocene loss of genetic diversity in a South American rodent. Biology Letters 1:423–426. Google Scholar
  29. J. Cheneval (1989). Fossil bird study, and paleoecological and paleoenvironmental consequences: Example from the Saint-Gérand-le-Puy deposits (Lower Miocene, Allier, France). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 73:295–309. Google Scholar
  30. A. Chinsamy, E. Buffetaut A. Canovilleand D. Angst (2014). Insight into the growth dynamics and systematic affinities of the late Cretaceous Gargantuavis from bone microstructure. Naturwissenschaften 101:447–452. Google Scholar
  31. A. Chinsamy, L. D. Martinand P. Dobson (1998). Bone microstructure of the diving Hesperornis and the voltant Ichthyornis from the Niobrara Chalk of western Kansas. Cretaceous Research 19:225–233. Google Scholar
  32. J. A. Clarke, D. T. Ksepka R. Salas-Gismondi A. J. Altamirano M. D. Shawkey L. D'Alba J. Vinther T. J. DeVriesand P. Baby (2010). Fossil evidence for evolution of the shape and color of penguin feathers. Science 330:954–957. Google Scholar
  33. J. A. Clarke, C. P. Tambussi J. I. Noriega G. M. Ericksonand R. A. Ketcham (2005). Definitive fossil evidence for the extant avian radiation in the Cretaceous. Nature 433:305–308. Google Scholar
  34. S. J. Clarke, G. H. Miller M. L. Fogel A. R. Chivasand C. V. Murray-Wallace (2006). The amino acid and stable isotope biogeochemistry of elephant bird (Aepyornis) eggshells from southern Madagascar. Quaternary Science Reviews 25:2343–2356. Google Scholar
  35. M. T. Clementz (2012). New insight from old bones: Stable isotope analysis of fossil mammals. Journal of Mammology 93:368–380. Google Scholar
  36. A. Cooper, and H. N. Poinar (2000). Ancient DNA: Do it right or not at all. Science 289:1139. Google Scholar
  37. A. Cooper, C. Lalueza-Fox S. Anderson A. Rambaut J. Austinand R. Ward (2001). Complete mitochondrial genome sequences of two extinct moas clarify ratite evolution. Nature 409:704–707. Google Scholar
  38. A. Cooper, C. Mourer-Chauviré G. K. Chambers A. von Haeseler A. C. Wilsonand S. Pääbo (1992). Independent origins of New Zealand moas and kiwis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 89:8741–8744. Google Scholar
  39. J. Cubo, P. Legendre A. de Ricqlès L. Montes E. de Margerie J. Castanetand Y. Desdevises (2008). Phylogenetic, functional, and structural components of variation in bone growth rate of amniotes. Evolution & Development 10:217–227. Google Scholar
  40. G. Cuvier (1800). Sur le Ornitholithes de Montmartre. Société Philomatique de Paris, Bulletin des Sciences (II) 41:129. Google Scholar
  41. G. Cuvier (1807). Mémoire sur les ossements d'Oiseaux qui se trouvent dans les carriers de pierre à platre des environs de Paris. Annales du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle 9:336–356. Google Scholar
  42. C. R. Darwin (1859). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. Murray, London. Google Scholar
  43. O. K. Davis (1987). Spores of the dung fungus Sporormiella: Increased abundance in historic sediments and before Pleistocene megafaunal extinction. Quaternary Research 28:290–294. Google Scholar
  44. F. J. Degrange, and C. P. Tambussi (2009). Análisis de elementos finitos aplicado en aves: Beneficios y limitaciones. Ameghiniana 46 (Suppl.):19R. Google Scholar
  45. F. J. Degrange, C. P. Tambussi K. Moreno L. M. Witmerand S. Wroe (2010). Mechanical analysis of feeding behavior in the extinct “terror bird” Andalgalornis steulleti (Gruiformes: Phorusrhacidae). PLOS One 5:e11856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011856 Google Scholar
  46. F. J. Degrange, C. P. Tambussi M. L. Taglioretti A. Dondasand F. Scaglia (In press). A new Mesembriornithinae (Aves, Phorusrhacidae) provides new insights into the phylogeny and sensory capabilities of terror birds. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. Google Scholar
  47. A. J. de Ricqlès (2011). Vertebrate palaeohistology: Past and future. Comptes Rendus Palevol 10:509–515. Google Scholar
  48. A. J. de Ricqlès, K. Padianand J. R. Horner (2001). The bone histology of basal birds in phylogenetic and ontogenetic perspectives. In New Perspectives on the Origin and Early Evolution of Birds: Proceedings of the International Symposium in Honor of John H. Ostrom ( J. Gauthierand L. F. Hall Editors), Peabody Museum of Natural History, New Haven, CT, USA, pp. 411–426. Google Scholar
  49. G. P. Dietl, and K. W. Flessa (2011). Conservation paleobiology: Putting the dead to work. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 26:30–37. Google Scholar
  50. P. Domínguez Alonso, A. C. Milner R. A. Ketcham M. J. Cooksonand T. B. Rowe (2004). The avian nature of the brain and inner ear of Archaeopteryx. Nature 430:666–669. Google Scholar
  51. P. C. J. Donoghue, S. Bengston X.-p. Dong N. J. Gostling T. Huldtgren J. A. Cunningham C. Yin Z. Yue F. Pengand M. Stampanoni (2006). Synchrotron X-ray tomographic microscopy of fossil embryos. Nature 442:680–683. Google Scholar
  52. R. P. Duncan, A. G. Boyerand T. M. Blackburn (2013). Magnitude and variation of prehistoric bird extinctions in the Pacific. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 110:6436–6441. Google Scholar
  53. R. A. Eagle, E. A. Schauble A. K. Tripati T. Tütken R. C. Hulbertand J. M. Eiler (2010). Body temperatures of modern and extinct vertebrates from 13C–18O bond abundances in bioapatite. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 107:10377–10382. Google Scholar
  54. T. Edinger (1928). Über einige fossile Gehirne. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 9:379–402. Google Scholar
  55. S. D. Emslie, and W. P. Patterson (2007). Abrupt recent shift in δ13C and δ15N values in Adélie Penguin eggshell in Antarctica. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104:11666–11669. Google Scholar
  56. L. S. Epp, S. Boessenkool E. P. Bellemain J. Haile A. Esposito T. Riaz C. Erséus V. I. Gusarov M. E. Edwards A. Johnsen H. K. Stenøien et al . (2012). New environmental metabarcodes for analysing soil DNA: Potential for studying past and present ecosystems. Molecular Ecology 21:1821–1833. Google Scholar
  57. A. Feduccia (1999).The Origin and Evolution of Birds. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA. Google Scholar
  58. A. Feduccia (2013). Bird origins anew. The Auk 130:1–12. Google Scholar
  59. L. G. Flink, R. Allen R. Barnett H. Malmström J. Peters J. Eriksson L. Andersson K. Dobneyand G. Larson (2014). Establishing the validity of domestication genes using DNA from ancient chickens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 111:6184–6189. Google Scholar
  60. H. J. Flint, K. P. Scott P. Louisand S. H. Duncan (2012). The role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology 9:577–589. Google Scholar
  61. L. Font, G. M. Nowell D. G. Pearson C. J. Ottleyand S. G. Willis (2007). Sr isotope analysis of bird feathers by TIMS: A tool to trace bird migration paths and breeding sites. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 22:513–522. Google Scholar
  62. M. Fürbringer (1888). Untersuchungen zur Morphologie und Systematik der Vögel, zugleich ein Beitrag zur Anatomie der Stütz- und Bewegungsorgane, Volume 2. T. van Holkema, Amsterdam. Google Scholar
  63. H. Gadow (1893). Vögel. II—Systematischer Theil. In Klassen und Ordnungen des Thier-Reichs, volume 6, part 4 ( H. G. Bronn Editor), C. F. Winter, Leipzig, pp. Google Scholar
  64. M. Gansauge, and M. Meyer (2013). Single-stranded DNA library preparation for the sequencing of ancient or damaged DNA. Nature Protocols 8:737–748. Google Scholar
  65. F. Gill, and D. Donsker (Editors) (2014). IOC World Bird Names. Google Scholar
  66. J. L. Gill, J. W. Williams S. T. Jackson K. B. Liningerand G. S. Robinson (2009). Pleistocene megafaunal collapse, novel plant communities, and enhanced fire regimes in North America. Science 326:1100–1103. Google Scholar
  67. A. Gnirke, A. Melnikov J. Maguire P. Rogov E. M. LeProust W. Brockman T. Fennell G. Giannoukos S. Fisher C. Russ S. Gabriel et al . (2009). Solution hybrid selection with ultra-long oligonucleotides for massively parallel targeted sequencing. Nature Biotechnology 27:182–189. Google Scholar
  68. E. M. Golenberg, D. E. Giannasi M. T. Clegg C. J. Smiley M. Durbin D. Hendersonand G. Zurawski (1990). Chloroplast DNA sequence from a Miocene Magnolia species. Nature 344:656–658. Google Scholar
  69. O. Haddrath, and A. J. Baker (2001). Complete mitochondrial DNA genome sequences of extinct birds: Ratite phylogenetics and the vicariance biogeography hypothesis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 268:939–945. Google Scholar
  70. J. Haile, R. Holdaway K. Oliver M. Bunce M. T. P. Gilbert R. Nielsen K. Munch S. Y. W. Ho B. Shapiroand E. Willerslev (2007). Ancient DNA chronology within sediment deposits: Are paleobiological reconstructions possible and is DNA leaching a factor? Molecular Biology and Evolution 24:982–989. Google Scholar
  71. D. M. Hansen (2010). On the use of taxon substitutes in rewilding projects on islands. In Islands and Evolution ( V. Perez-Melladoand C. Ramon Editors), Institut Menorquí d'Estudis, Islas Baleares, Spain, pp. 111–146. Google Scholar
  72. D. J. Hawke (2004). Maximum possible age of a petrel breeding colony near Punakaiki (South Island, New Zealand) from radiocarbon and stable isotope analysis of soil. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 34:1–7. Google Scholar
  73. D. J. Hawke, R. N. Holdaway J. E. Causerand S. Ogden (1999). Soil indicators of pre-European seabird breeding in New Zealand at sites identified by predator deposits. Australian Journal of Soil Research 37:103–113. Google Scholar
  74. M. B. Hebsgaard, M. J. Phillipsand E. Willerslev (2005). Geologically ancient DNA: Fact or artefact? Trends in Microbiology 13:212–220. Google Scholar
  75. M. Hofreiter, M. Collinsand J. R. Stewart (2012). Ancient biomolecules in Quaternary palaeoecology. Quaternary Science Reviews 33:1–13. Google Scholar
  76. M. Horrocks, D. D'Costa R. Wallace R. Gardnerand R. Kondo (2004). Plant remains in coprolites: Diet of a subalpine moa (Dinornithiformes) from southern New Zealand. Emu 104:149–156. Google Scholar
  77. M. Horrocks, J. Salter J. Braggins S. Nichol R. Moorhouseand G. Elliot (2008). Plant microfossil analysis of coprolites of the critically endangered Kakapo (Strigops habroptilus) parrot from New Zealand. Review of Palaeobotany & Palynology 149:229–245. Google Scholar
  78. A. Houssaye (2014). Advances in vertebrate palaeohistology: Recent progress, discoveries, and new approaches. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 112:645–648. Google Scholar
  79. H. Howard (1957). A gigantic “toothed” marine bird from the Miocene of California. Bulletin of the Department of Geology of the Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History 1:1–23. Google Scholar
  80. J. Huang, L. Sun W. Huang X. Wangand Y. Wang (2010). The ecosystem evolution of penguin colonies in the past 8,500 years on Vestfold Hills, East Antarctica. Polar Biology 33:1399–1406. Google Scholar
  81. J. Huang, L. Sun W. Huang X. Wangand Y. Wang (2011). Late Holocene Adélie Penguin population dynamics at Zolotov Island, Vestfold Hills, Antarctica. Journal of Paleolimnology 45:273–285. Google Scholar
  82. J. Huang, L. Sun N. Long Y. Wangand W. Huang (2013). Penguin tissue as a proxy for relative krill abundance in East Antarctica during the Holocene. Scientific Reports 3:2807. Google Scholar
  83. J. Huang, L. Sun Y. Wang X. Liuand R. Zhu (2009). Penguin population dynamics for the past 8500 years at Gardner Island, Vestfold Hills. Antarctic Science 21:571–578. Google Scholar
  84. C.-M. Hung, R.-C. Lin J.-H. Chu C.-F. Yeh C.-J. Yaoand S.-H. Li (2013). The de novo assembly of mitochondrial genomes of the extinct Passenger Pigeon (Ectopistes migratorius) with next generation sequencing. PLOS One 8:e56301. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056301 Google Scholar
  85. C.-M. Hung, P.-J. L. Shaner R. M. Zink W.-C. Liu T.-C. Chu W.-S. Huangand S.-H. Li (2014). Drastic population fluctuations explain the rapid extinction of the Passenger Pigeon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 111:10636–10641. Google Scholar
  86. T. H. Huxley (1867). On the classification of birds; and on the taxonomic value of the modifications of certain of the cranial bones observable in that class. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, pp. 415–472. Google Scholar
  87. L. Huynen, C. D. Millarand D. Lambert (2012). Resurrecting ancient animal genomes: The extinct moa and more. BioEssays 34:661–669. Google Scholar
  88. L. Huynen, C. D. Millar R. P. Scofieldand D. Lambert (2003). Nuclear DNA sequences detect species limits in ancient moa. Nature 425:175–178. Google Scholar
  89. L. Huynen, T. Suzuki T. Ogura Y. Watanabe C. D. Millar M. Hofreiter C. Smith S. Mirmoeiniand D. Lambert (2014). Reconstruction and in vivo analysis of the extinct tbx5 gene from ancient wingless moa (Aves: Dinornithiformes). BMC Evolutionary Biology 14:75. Google Scholar
  90. R. Inger, and S. Bearhop (2008). Applications of stable isotope analyses to avian ecology. Ibis 150:447–461. Google Scholar
  91. A. N. Iwaniuk, and J. E. Nelson (2002). Can endocranial volume be used as an estimate of brain size in birds? Canadian Journal of Zoology 80:16–23. Google Scholar
  92. H. F. James, and D. A. Burney (1997). The diet and ecology of Hawaii's extinct flightless waterfowl: Evidence from coprolites. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 62:279–297. Google Scholar
  93. B. J. Johnson, G. H. Miller M. L. Fogel J. W. Magee M. K. Gaganand A. R. Chivas (1999). 65,000 years of vegetation change in central Australia and the Australian summer monsoon. Science 284:1150–1152. Google Scholar
  94. M. A. Katzenberg (2007). Stable isotope analysis: A tool for studying past diet, demography, and life history. In Biological Anthropology of the Human Skeleton, second edition ( M. A. Katzenbergand S. R. Saunders Editors), John Wiley & Sons, Oxford, UK, pp. 411–441. Google Scholar
  95. S. Kawabe, T. Andoand H. Endo (2014). Enigmatic affinity in the brain morphology between plotopterids and penguins, with a comprehensive comparison among water birds. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 170:467–493. Google Scholar
  96. S. Kawabe, T. Shimokawa H. Miki T. Okamoto S. Matsuda T. Itou H. Koie M. Kitagawa T. Sakai M. Hosojimaand H. Endo (2013). Relationship between brain volume and brain width in mammals and birds. Paleontological Research 17:282–293. Google Scholar
  97. B. E. Keatley, J. M. Blais M. S. V. Douglas I. Gregory-Eaves M. L. Mallory N. Micheluttiand J. P. Smol (2011). Historical seabird population dynamics and their effects on Arctic pond ecosystems: A multi-proxy paleolimnological study from Cape Vera, Devon Island, Arctic Canada. Fundamental and Applied Limnology 179:51–66. Google Scholar
  98. J. F. Kelly (2000). Stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen in the study of avian and mammalian trophic ecology. Canadian Journal of Zoology 78:1–27. Google Scholar
  99. M. Kircher, and J. Kelso (2010). High-throughput DNA sequencing—Concepts and limitations. BioEssays 32:524–536. Google Scholar
  100. M. J. Kohn, and T. E. Cerling (2002). Stable isotope compositions of biological apatite. Phosphates: Geochemical, Geobiological, and Materials Importance 48:455–488. Google Scholar
  101. L. Kraglievich (1931). Contribución al conocimientode de las aves fósiles de la época araucoentrerriana. Physis 10:304–315. Google Scholar
  102. D. T. Ksepka, A. M. Balanoff S. Walsh A. Revanand A. Ho (2012). Evolution of the brain and sensory organs in Sphenisciformes: New data from the stem penguin Paraptenodytes antarcticus. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 166:202–219. Google Scholar
  103. R. P. Lamanon (1782). Description de divers fossiles trouvés dans les carrières de Montmartre près Paris, et vues générales sur la formation des Pierres gypseuses. Journal de Physique, de Chimie, d'Histoire Naturelle et des Arts 19:173–194. Google Scholar
  104. K. Lambrecht (1916). Geschichte und Bibliographie der Palaeornithologie. Aquila 23:483–501. Google Scholar
  105. K. Lambrecht (1933). Handbuch der Palaeornithologie. Borntraeger, Berlin. Google Scholar
  106. M. S. Y. Lee, and T. H. Worthy (2011). Likelihood reinstates Archaeopteryx as a primitive bird. Biology Letters 8:299–303. Google Scholar
  107. Y. K. Lee, and S. K. Mazmanian (2010). Has the microbiota played a critical role in the evolution of the adaptive immune system? Science 330:1768–1773. Google Scholar
  108. L. Legendre, N. Le Roy C. A. Martinez-Maza L. Montes M. Laurinand J. Cubo (2013). Phylogenetic signal in bone histology of amniotes revisited. Zoologica Scripta 42:44–53. Google Scholar
  109. L. J. Legendre, E. Bourdon R. P. Scofield A. J. D. Tennyson H. Lamrous A. Ricqlèsand J. Cubo (2014). Bone histology, phylogeny, and palaeognathous birds (Aves: Palaeognathe). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 112:688–700. Google Scholar
  110. A. M. Lister (2014). Behavioural leads in evolution: Evidence from the fossil record. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 112:315–331. Google Scholar
  111. X. Liu, Y. Nie L. Sunand S. D. Emslie (2013). Eco-environmental implications of elemental and carbon isotope distributions in ornithogenic sediments from the Ross Sea region, Antarctica. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 117:99–114. Google Scholar
  112. X. Liu, L. Sun D. Liand Y. Wang (2011). Rare earth elements in the ornithogenic sediments from the Maritime Antarctic: A potential new palaeoecological proxy. Geochemical Journal 45:15–26. Google Scholar
  113. X. Liu, L. Sun Z. Xie X. Yin R. Zhuand Y. Wang (2007). A preliminary record of the historical seabird population in the Larsemann Hills, East Antarctica, from geochemical analyses of Mochou Lake sediments. Boreas 36:182–197. Google Scholar
  114. X. D. Liu, S. P. Zhao L. G. Sun H. H. Luo X. B. Yin Z. Q. Xie Y. H. Wang K. X. Liu X. H. Wu X. F. Dingand D. P. Fu (2006a). Geochemical evidence for the variation of historical seabird population on Dongdao Island of the South China Sea. Journal of Paleolimnology 36:259–279. Google Scholar
  115. X.-D. Liu, H.-C. Li L.-G. Sun X.-B. Yin S.-P. Zhaoand Y.-H. Wang (2006b). δ13C and δ15N in the ornithogenic sediments from the Antarctic maritime as palaeoecological proxies during the past 2000 yr. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 243:424–438. Google Scholar
  116. S. Lorenzini, C. Baroni A. E. Fallick I. Baneschi M. C. Salvatore G. Zanchettaand L. Dallai (2010). Stable isotopes reveal Holocene changes in the diet of Adélie Penguins in Northern Victoria Land (Ross Sea, Antarctica). Oecologia 164:911–919. Google Scholar
  117. A. Louchart, J.-Y. Sire C. Mourer-Chauviré D. Geraads L. Viriotand V. de Buffrénil (2013). Structure and growth pattern of pseudoteeth in Pelagornis mauretanicus (Aves, Odontopterygiformes, Pelagornithidae). PLOS One 8:e80372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080372 Google Scholar
  118. G. Mayr (2004). A partial skeleton of a new fossil loon (Aves, Gaviiformes) from the early Oligocene of Germany with preserved stomach content. Journal of Ornithology 145:281–286. Google Scholar
  119. G. Mayr (2009). Palaeogene Fossil Birds. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany. Google Scholar
  120. G. Mayr (2011). Cenozoic mystery birds—On the phylogenetic affinities of bony-toothed birds (Pelagornithidae). Zoologica Scripta 40:448–467. Google Scholar
  121. G. Mayr, and V. Wilde (2014). Eocene fossil is earliest evidence of flower-visiting by birds. Biology Letters 10:20140223. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0223 Google Scholar
  122. F. Mertes, A. ElShawary S. Sauer J. M. L. M. van Helvoort P. J. van der Zaag A. Franke M. Nilsson H. Lehrachand A. J. Brookes (2011). Targeted enrichment of genomic DNA regions for next-generation sequencing. Briefings in Functional Genomics 10:374–386. Google Scholar
  123. M. Meyer, M. Kircher M.-T. Gansauge H. Li F. Racimo S. Mallick J. G. Schraiber F. Jay K. Prüfer C. de Filippo P. H. Sudmant et al . (2012). A high-coverage genome sequence from an archaic Denisovan individual. Science 338:222–226. Google Scholar
  124. A. Milne-Edwards (1867–1871). Recherches anatomiques et paléontologiques pour servir à l'histoire des oiseaux fossiles de la France. Victor Masson et fils, Paris. Google Scholar
  125. K. J. Mitchell, B. Llamas J. Soubrier N. J. Rawlence T. H. Worthy J. R. Wood M. S. Y. Leeand A. Cooper (2014b). Ancient DNA reveals elephant birds and kiwi are sister taxa and clarifies ratite bird evolution. Science 344:898–900. Google Scholar
  126. K. J. Mitchell, J. R. Wood R. P. Scofield B. Llamasand A. Cooper (2014a). Ancient mitochondrial genome reveals unsuspected taxonomic affinity of the extinct Chatham Duck (Pachyanas chathamica) and resolves divergence times for New Zealand and sub-Antarctic brown teals. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 70:420–428. Google Scholar
  127. J. Mlíkovský (2002). Cenozoic birds of the world. Part 1: Europe. Ninox Press, Praha, Czech Republic. Google Scholar
  128. D. Naish (2014). The fossil record of bird behaviour. Journal of Zoology 292:268–280. Google Scholar
  129. A. Newton (1893). A Dictionary of Birds. Black, London. Google Scholar
  130. Y. Nie, X. Liuand S. D. Emslie (2014a). Distribution and sources of rare earth elements in ornithogenic sediments from the Ross Sea region, Antarctica. Microchemical Journal 114:247–260. Google Scholar
  131. Y. Nie, X. Liu T. Wen L. Sunand S. D. Emslie (2014b). Environmental implication of nitrogen isotopic composition in ornithogenic sediments from the Ross Sea region, East Antarctica: Δ15N as a new proxy for avian influence. Chemical Geology 363:91–100. Google Scholar
  132. C. C. Oldfield, C. R. McHenry P. D. Clausen U. Chamoli W. C. H. Parr D. D. Stynderand S. Wroe (2012). Finite element analysis of ursid cranial mechanics and the prediction of feeding behaviour in the extinct giant Agriotherium africanum. Journal of Zoology 286:171. doi: 10.1111/j.1469–7998.2011.00862.x Google Scholar
  133. M. E. Olsen, C. F. Bengtsson M. F. Bertelsen E. Willerslevand M. T. P. Gilbert (2012). DNA from keratinous tissue. Part II: Feather. Annals of Anatomy 194:31–35. Google Scholar
  134. L. Orlando, A. Ginolhac G. Zhang D. Froese A. Albrechtsen M. Stiller M. Schubert E. Cappellini B. Petersen I. Moltke P. L. F. Johnson et al . (2013). Recalibrating Equus evolution using the genome sequence of an early Middle Pleistocene horse. Nature 499:74–78. Google Scholar
  135. C. L. Oskam, J. Haile E. McLay P. Rigby M. E. Allentoft M. E. Olsen C. Bengtsson G. H. Miller J. Schwenninger C. Jacomb R. Walter et al . (2010). Fossil avian eggshell preserves ancient DNA. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 277:1991–2000. Google Scholar
  136. C. L. Oskam, C. Jacomb M. E. Allentoft R. Walter R. P. Scofield J. Haile R. N. Holdawayand M. Bunce (2011). Molecular and morphological analyses of avian eggshell excavated from a late thirteenth century earth oven. Journal of Archaeological Science 38:2589–2595. Google Scholar
  137. R. Owen (1873). Description of the skull of a dentigerous bird (Odontopteryx toliapicus [sic], Ow.) from the London Clay of Sheppey. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 29:511–522. Google Scholar
  138. R. Owen (1879). Memoirs on the Extinct Wingless Birds of New Zealand, with an Appendix on Those of England, Australia, Newfoundland, Mauritius, and Rodriguez. John van Voorst, London. Google Scholar
  139. K. Padian (2011). Vertebrate palaeohistology then and now: A retrospective in the light of the contributions of Armand de Ricqlès. Comptes Rendus Palevol 10:303–309. Google Scholar
  140. K. Padian, and E. T. Lamm (Editors) (2013). Bone Histology of Fossil Tetrapods: Advancing Methods, Analysis, and Interpretation. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA. Google Scholar
  141. J. L. A. Paijmans, M. T. P. Gilbertand M. Hoffreiter (2013). Mitogenomic analyses from ancient DNA. Molecular Phylogenetics & Evolution 69:404–416. Google Scholar
  142. R. Patnaik, A. Sahni D. Cameron B. Pillans P. Chatrath E. Simons M. Williamsand F. Bibi (2009). Ostrich-like eggshells from a 10.1 million-yr-old Miocene ape locality, Haritalyangar, Himachal Pradesh, India. Current Science 96:1485–1495. Google Scholar
  143. A. Paulina-Carabajal, C. Acosta-Hospitalecheand R. E. Yury-Yáñez (2014). Endocranial morphology of Pygoscelis calderensis (Aves, Spheniscidae) from the Neogene of Chile and remarks on brain morphology in modern Pygoscelis. Historical Biology. doi: 10.1080/08912963.2014.898067 Google Scholar
  144. K. Prüfer, F. Racimo N. Patterson F. Jay S. Sankararaman S. Sawyer A. Heinze G. Renaud P. H. Sudmant C. de Filippo H. Li et al . (2014). The complete genome sequence of a Neanderthal from the Altai Mountains. Nature 505:43–49. Google Scholar
  145. R. A. Racicot, and T. Rowe (2014). Endocranial anatomy of a new fossil porpoise (Odontoceti, Phocoenidae) from the Pliocene San Diego Formation of California. Journal of Paleontology 88:652–663. Google Scholar
  146. N. J. Rawlence, J. Metcalf J. R. Wood T. H. Worthy J. J. Austinand A. Cooper (2012). The effect of climate and environmental change on the megafaunal moa of New Zealand in the absence of humans. Quaternary Science Reviews 50:141–153. Google Scholar
  147. N. J. Rawlence, J. R. Wood K. N. Armstrongand A. Cooper (2009). DNA content and distribution in ancient feathers and potential to reconstruct the plumage of extinct avian taxa. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 276:3395–3402. Google Scholar
  148. E. J. Rayfield (2005). Using finite-element analysis to investigate suture morphology: A case study using large carnivorous dinosaurs. The Anatomical Record Part A: Discoveries in Molecular, Cellular, and Evolutionary Biology 283:349–365. Google Scholar
  149. E. J. Rayfield (2007). Finite element analysis and understanding the biomechanics and evolution of living and fossil organisms. Annual Reviews of Earth and Planetary Sciences 35:541–576. Google Scholar
  150. E. J. Rayfield (2011). Strain in the ostrich mandible during simulated pecking and validation of specimen-specific finite element models. Journal of Anatomy 218:47–58. Google Scholar
  151. Revive & Restore (2014). The Great Passenger Pigeon Comeback. Google Scholar
  152. E. Rizzi, M. Lari E. Gigli G. De Bellisand D. Carmelli (2013). Ancient DNA studies: New perspectives on old samples. Genetics Selection Evolution 44:21. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-44-21 Google Scholar
  153. G. S. Robinson, L. P. Burneyand D. A. Burney (2005). Landscape paleoecology and megafaunal extinction in southeastern New York State. Ecological Monographs 75:295–315. Google Scholar
  154. D. Rojas, C. A. Mancina J. J. Flores-Martínezand L. Navarro (2013). Phylogenetic signal, feeding behaviour and brain volume in Neotropical bats. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 26:1925–1933. Google Scholar
  155. S. Rule, B. W. Brook S. G. Haberle C. S. M. Turney A. P. Kershawand C. N. Johnson (2012). The aftermath of megafaunal extinction: Ecosystem transformation in Pleistocene Australia. Science 335:1483–1486. Google Scholar
  156. R. Sandler (2014). The ethics of reviving long extinct species. Conservation Biology 28:354–360. Google Scholar
  157. J. J. Scheuchzer (1708). Piscium querelae et vindiciae [On entitled and accused fishes]. Tiguri, Zürich. (In Latin.) Google Scholar
  158. R. Schilling, B. Jastram O. Wings D. Schwarz-Wingsand A. S. Issever (2013). Reviving the dinosaur: Virtual reconstruction and three-dimensional printing of a dinosaur vertebra. Radiology 270:864–871. Google Scholar
  159. M. H. Schweitzer, Z. Suo R. Avci J. M. Asara M. A. Allen F. T. Arceand J. R. Horner (2007). Analyses of soft tissue from Tyrannosaurus rex suggest the presence of protein. Science 316:277–280. Google Scholar
  160. R. P. Scofield, and K. W. S. Ashwell (2009). Rapid somatic expansion causes the brain to lag behind: The case of the brain and behavior of New Zealand's Haast's Eagle (Harpagornis moorei). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 29:637–649. Google Scholar
  161. P. J. Seddon, C. J. Griffiths P. S. Sooraeand D. P. Armstrong (2014). Reversing defaunation: Restoring species in a changing world. Science 345:406–412. Google Scholar
  162. L. Segalen, M. Renard M. Pickford B. Senut I. Cojan L. Le Callonnecand P. Rognon (2002). Environmental and climatic evolution of the Namib Desert since the Middle Miocene: The contribution of carbon isotopes in ratite eggshells. Comptes Rendus Geoscience 334:917–924. Google Scholar
  163. R. F. Service (2009). ‘Protein' in 80-million-year-old fossil bolsters controversial T. rex claim. Science 324:578. Google Scholar
  164. B. Shapiro, A. J. Drummond A. Rambaut M. C. Wilson P. E. Matheus A. V. Sher O. G. Pybus M. T. P. Gilbert I. Barnes J. Binladen E. Willerslev et al . (2004). Rise and fall of the Beringian Steppe Bison. Science 306:1561–1565. doi: 10.1126/science.1101074 Google Scholar
  165. J. Shendure, and H. Ji (2008). Next-generation DNA sequencing. Nature Biotechnology 26:1135–1145. Google Scholar
  166. J. S. Sipla (2007). The semicircular canals of birds and non-avian theropod dinosaurs. Ph.D. dissertation, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA. Google Scholar
  167. N. A. Smith, and J. A. Clarke (2012). Endocranial anatomy of the Charadriiformes: Sensory system variation and the evolution of wing-propelled diving. PLOS One 7:e49584. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049584 Google Scholar
  168. N. A. Smith, and J. A. Clarke (2014). Osteological histology of the Pan-Alcidae (Aves, Charadriiformes): Correlates of wing-propelled diving and flightlessness. The Anatomical Record 297:188–199 Google Scholar
  169. J. Soons, A. Herrel A. Genbrugge D. Adriaens P. Aerts J. Podosand J. Dirckx (2012). Multi-layered bird beaks: A finite-element approach towards the role of keratin in stress dissipation. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 9:1787–1796. Google Scholar
  170. J. Soons, A. Herrel A. Genbrugge P. Aerts J. Podos D. Adriaens Y. de Witte P. Jacobsand J. Dirckx (2010). Mechanical stress, fracture risk and beak evolution in Darwin's ground finches (Geospiza). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 365:1093–1098. Google Scholar
  171. D. W. Steadman (2005). The paleoecology and fossil history of migratory landbirds. In Birds of Two Worlds: The Ecology and Evolution of Migration ( R. Greenbergand P. P. Marra Editors), The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, USA, pp. 5–17. Google Scholar
  172. J. R. M. Stewart, R. B. Allen A. K. G. Jones K. E. H. Penkmanand M. J. Collins (2013). ZooMS: Making eggshell visible in the archaeological record. Journal of Archaeological Science 40:1797–1804. Google Scholar
  173. S. Subramanian, D. R. Denver C. D. Millar T. Heupink A. Schrafi S. D. Emslie C. Baroniand D. M. Lambert (2009). High mitogenomic evolutionary rates and time dependency. Trends in Genetics 25:482–486. Google Scholar
  174. L. Sun, R. Zhu X. Liu Z. Xie X. Yin S. Zhaoand Y. Wang (2005). HCl-soluble 87Sr/86Sr ratio in sediments impacted by penguin or seal excreta as a proxy for historical population size in the maritime Antarctic. Marine Ecology Progress Series 303:43–50. Google Scholar
  175. C. P. Tambussi, and F. J. Degrange (2013). The Paleogene birds of South America. In South American and Antarctic Continental Cenozoic Birds: Paleobiogeographic Affinities and Disparities, Springer, The Netherlands, pp. 29–47. Google Scholar
  176. C. P. Tambussi, F. J. Degrangeand D. T. Ksepka (In press). Endocranial anatomy of Antarctic Eocene stem penguins: Implications for sensory system evolution in Sphenisciformes (Aves). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. Google Scholar
  177. C. P. Tambussi, R. de Mendoza F. J. Degrangeand M. B. Picasso (2012). Flexibility along the neck of the Neogene terror bird Andalgalornis steulleti (Aves Phorusrhacidae). PLOS One 7:e37701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037701 Google Scholar
  178. V. A. Thomson, O. Lebrasseur J. J. Austin T. L. Hunt D. A. Burney T. Denham N. J. Rawlence J. R. Wood J. Gongora L. G. Flink A. Linderholm et al . (2014). Using ancient DNA to study the origins and dispersal of ancestral Polynesian chickens across the Pacific. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 111:4826–4831. Google Scholar
  179. R. Y. Tito, D. Knights J. Metcalf A. J. Obregon-Tito L. Cleeland F. Najar B. Roe K. Reinhard K. Sobolik S. Belknap M. Foster et al . (2012). Insights from characterizing extinct human gut microbiomes. PLOS One 7:e51146. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051146 Google Scholar
  180. H. Tlaskalová-Hogenová, R. Štěpánková H. Kozáková T. Hudcovic L. Vannucci L. Tučková P. Rossmann T. Hrnčíř M. Kverka Z. Zákostelská K. Klimešová et al . (2011). The role of gut microbiota (commensal bacteria) and the mucosal barrier in the pathogenesis of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases and cancer: Contribution of germ-free and gnotobiotic animal models of human diseases. Cellular & Molecular Immunology 8:110–120. Google Scholar
  181. Z. J. Tseng (2009). Cranial function in a late Miocene Dinocrocuta gigantea (Mammalia: Carnivora) revealed by comparative finite element analysis. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 96:51–67. Google Scholar
  182. S. T. Turvey, O. R. Greenand R. N. Holdaway (2005). Cortical growth marks reveal extended juvenile development in New Zealand moa. Nature 435:940–943. Google Scholar
  183. C. Wadsworth, and M. Buckley (2013). Proteome degradation in fossils: Investigating the longevity of protein survival in ancient bone. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 28:605–615. Google Scholar
  184. D. W. Waite, and M. W. Taylor (2014). Characterizing the avian gut microbiota: Membership, driving influences, and potential function. Frontiers in Microbiology. doi:  10.3389/fmicb.2014.00223Google Scholar
  185. D. W. Waite, P. Deinesand M. W. Taylor (2012). Gut microbiome of the critically endangered New Zealand parrot, the Kakapo (Strigops habroptilus). PLOS One 7:e35803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035803 Google Scholar
  186. D. W. Waite, D. K. Easonand M. W. Taylor (2014). Influence of hand-rearing and bird age on the faecal microbiota of the critically endangered Kakapo. Applied Environmental Microbiology. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00975-14 Google Scholar
  187. S. Walsh, and A. C. Milner (2011). Halcyornis toliapicus (Aves: Lower Eocene, England) indicates advanced neuromorphology in Mesozoic Neornithes. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 9:173–181. Google Scholar
  188. S. A. Walsh, P. M. Barrett A. C. Milner G. Manleyand L. M. Witmer (2009). Inner ear anatomy is a proxy for deducing auditory capability and behaviour in reptiles and birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 276:1355–1360. Google Scholar
  189. S. A. Walsh, A. N. Iwaniuk M. A. Knoll E. Bourdon P. M. Barrett A. C. Milner R. L. Nudds R. L. Abeland P. Dello Sterpaio (2013). Avian cerebellar floccular fossa size is not a proxy for flying ability in birds. PLOS One 8:e67176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067176 Google Scholar
  190. S. A. Walsh, Z.-X. Luoand P. M. Barrett (2014). Modern imaging techniques as a window to prehistoric auditory worlds. Insights from Comparative Hearing Research 49:227–261. Google Scholar
  191. A. E. Wiley, P. H. Ostrom A. J. Welch R. C. Fleischer H. Gandhi J. R. Southon T. W. Stafford Jr J. F. Penniman D. Hu F. P. Duvalland H. F. James (2013). Millennial-scale isotope records from a wide-ranging predator show evidence of recent human impact to oceanic food webs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 110:8972–8977. Google Scholar
  192. E. Willerslev, and A. Cooper (2005). Ancient DNA. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 272:3–16. Google Scholar
  193. E. Willerslev, A. J. Hansen J. Binladen T. B. Brand M. T. P. Gilbert B. Shapiro M. Bunce C. Wiuf D. A. Gilichinskyand A. Cooper (2003). Diverse plant and animal genetic records from Holocene and Pleistocene sediments. Science 300:791–795. Google Scholar
  194. L. E. Wilson, and K. Chin (2014). Comparative osteohistology of Hesperornis with reference to pygoscelid penguins: The effects of climate and behaviour on avian bone microstructure. Royal Society Open Science 1:140245. doi: 10.1098/rsos.140245 Google Scholar
  195. H. Winkler, B. Leislerand G. Bernroider (2004). Ecological constraints on the evolution of avian brains. Journal of Ornithology 145:238–244. Google Scholar
  196. L. M. Witmer, and K. D. Rose (1991). Biomechanics of the jaw apparatus of the gigantic Eocene bird Diatryma: Implications for diet and mode of life. Paleobiology 17:95–120. Google Scholar
  197. L. M. Witmer, R. C. Ridgely D. L. Dufeauand M. C. Semones (2008). Using CT to peer into the past: 3D visualization of the brain and ear regions of birds, crocodiles, and nonavian dinosaurs. In Anatomical Imaging: Towards a New Morphology ( H. Endoand R. Frey Editors), Springer, Japan, pp. 67–87. Google Scholar
  198. J. R. Wood, and J. M. Wilmshurst (2014). Late Quaternary terrestrial vertebrate coprolites from New Zealand. Quaternary Science Reviews 98:33–44. Google Scholar
  199. J. R. Wood, N. J. Rawlence G. M. Rogers T. H. Worthy J. J. Austinand A. Cooper (2008). Coprolite deposits reveal the diet and ecology of the extinct New Zealand megaherbivore moa (Aves, Dinornithiformes). Quaternary Science Reviews 27:2593–2602. Google Scholar
  200. J. R. Wood, J. M. Wilmshurst A. S. Holzapfel T. H. Worthyand A. Cooper (2012). A lost link between a flightless parrot and a parasitic plant and the potential role of coprolites in conservation paleoecology. Conservation Biology 26:141–153. Google Scholar
  201. J. R. Wood, J. M. Wilmshurst N. J. Rawlence K. I. Bonner T. H. Worthy J. M. Kinsellaand A. Cooper (2013b). A megafauna's microfauna: Gastrointestinal parasites of New Zealand's extinct moa (Aves: Dinornithiformes). PLOS One 8:e57315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057315 Google Scholar
  202. J. R. Wood, J. M. Wilmshurst S. J. Richardson N. J. Rawlence S. J. Wagstaff T. H. Worthyand A. Cooper (2013a). Resolving lost herbivore community structure using coprolites of four sympatric moa species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 110:16910–16915. Google Scholar
  203. J. R. Wood, J. M. Wilmshurst T. H. Worthyand A. Cooper (2011). Sporormiella as a proxy for non-mammalian herbivores in island ecosystems. Quaternary Science Reviews 30:915–920. Google Scholar
  204. S. R. Woodward, N. J. Weyandand M. Bunell (1994). DNA sequence from Cretaceous period bone fragments. Science 266:1229–1232. Google Scholar
  205. T. H. Worthy, and R. P. Scofield (2012). Twenty-first century advances in knowledge of the biology of moa (Aves: Dinornithiformes): A new morphological analysis and moa diagnoses revised. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 39:87–153. Google Scholar
  206. S. Wroe (2008). Cranial mechanics compared in extinct marsupial and extant African lions using a finite-element approach. Journal of Zoology 274:332–339. Google Scholar
  207. S. Wroe, U. Chamoli W. C. H. Parr P. Clausen R. Ridgelyand L. M. Witmer (2013). Comparative biomechanical modeling of metatherian and placental saber-tooths: A different kind of bite for an extreme pouched predator. PLOS One 8:e66888. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066888 Google Scholar
  208. S. Wroe, C. McHenryand J. Thomason (2005). Bite club: Comparative bite force in big biting mammals and the prediction of predatory behaviour in fossil taxa. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 272:619–625. Google Scholar
  209. X. Wu, and L. A. Schepartz (2009). Application of computed tomography in paleoanthropological research. Progress in Natural Science 19:913–921. Google Scholar
  210. H. Xiang, J. Gao B. Yu H. Zhou D. Cai Y. Zhang X. Chen X. Wang M. Hofreiterand X. Zhao (2014). Early Holocene chicken domestication in northern China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 111:17564–17569. Google Scholar
  211. Z. Xie, and L. Sun (2008). A 1,800-year records of arsenic concentration in the penguin dropping sediment, Antarctic. Environmental Geology 55:1055–1059. Google Scholar
  212. L. Q. Xu, X. D. Liu L. G. Sun Q. Q. Chen H. Yan Y. Liu Y. H. Luoand J. Huang (2011). A 700-year record of mercury in avian eggshells of Guangjin Island, South China Sea. Environmental Pollution 159:889–896. Google Scholar
  213. H. Yan, L. Sun Y. Wang X. Liu S. Qiuand W. Cheng (2010). A 2000-year record of copper pollution in South China Sea derived from seabird excrements: A potential indicator for copper production and civilization of China. Journal of Paleolimnology 44:431–442. Google Scholar
  214. Y. Yanes, A. García-Alix M. P. Astaand M. Ibáñez (2013). Late Pleistocene–Holocene environmental conditions in Lanzarote (Canary Islands) inferred from calcitic and aragonitic land snail shells and bird bones. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 378:91–102. Google Scholar
  215. M. T. Young, E. J. Rayfield C. M. Holliday L. M. Witmer D. J. Button P. Upchurchand P. M. Barrett (2012). Cranial biomechanics of Diplodocus (Dinosauria, Sauropoda): Testing hypotheses of feeding behaviour in an extinct megaherbivore. Naturwissenschaften 99:637–643. Google Scholar
  216. L. Yuan, L. Sun N. Long Z. Xie Y. Wangand X. Liu (2010). Seabirds colonized Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard, Arctic ~9,400 years ago. Polar Biology 33:683–691. Google Scholar
  217. D. K. F. Zelenitsky, R. C. Therrien R. C. Ridgely A. R. McGeeand L. M. Witmer (2011). Evolution of olfaction in non-avian theropod dinosaurs and birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 278:3625–3634. Google Scholar
  218. X. Zheng, L. D. Martin Z. Zhou D. A. Burnham F. Zhangand D. Miao (2011). Fossil evidence of avian crops from the Early Cretaceous of China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 108:15904–15907. Google Scholar
  219. Z. Zhou, and F. Zhang (2007). Mesozoic birds of China—A synoptic review. Frontiers of Biology in China 2:1–14. Google Scholar
  220. H. Zischler, M. Hoss O. Handt A. von Haeseler A. C. van der Kuyland J. Goudsmit (1995). Detecting dinosaur DNA. Science 268:1192–1193. Google Scholar
Jamie R. Wood and Vanesa L. De Pietri "Next-generation paleornithology: Technological and methodological advances allow new insights into the evolutionary and ecological histories of living birds," The Auk 132(2), (1 April 2015).
Received: 12 November 2014; Accepted: 1 January 2015; Published: 1 April 2015

Back to Top