Open Access
Translator Disclaimer
21 June 2022 Falsoceratoprion fumagalliae, New Genus and Species: The First Calopterini from Dominican Amber (Coleoptera: Lycidae)
Vinicius S. Ferreira, Lorenzo Tettamanzi
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Falsoceratoprion fumagalliae Ferreira, new genus and new species, the first discovered Calopterini fossil, is described from Dominican amber. The new genus is diagnosed, described, illustrated, and compared with other Dominican amber Lycidae and closely related extant genera.

Introduction

Lycidae are particularly known for their involvement in mimicry-ring relationships and aposematism studies (e.g., Darlington 1938; Eisner et al. 2008), and for having lineages known or suspected to be affected by the paedomorphic syndrome (see Ferreira et al. 2018; Ferreira and Silveira 2020). Despite incremental advances focused on the phylogenetics of Lycidae (e.g., Bocak and Bocakova 2008; Kazantsev 2013; Masek et al. 2018), there is still much ground to cover on the taxonomic and biological aspects of this group, especially regarding the fossil record of this family.

The described Lycidae fossil record encompasses both impressions and amber inclusions. Of these, a total of 11 species have been described from amber from various deposits, including Cretaceous Burmese amber (two species), Eocene Baltic amber (five species), Miocene Dominican amber (three species) and from Miocene Mexican amber (one species); detailed lists of amber Lycidae may be found in Kazantsev (2020), Li et al. (2021), and Ferreira et al. (2022). The recent posting of photographs of a Dominican amber Lycidae specimen on Facebook groups by Enrico Bonino was brought to VSF's attention by Fabrizio Fanti. So far, all known described Dominican amber Lycidae belong to the tribe Leptolycini. Examination of some of these photographs revealed the existence of an undescribed genus from Dominican amber belonging to the tribe Calopterini, for which, importantly, no fossils are known. Upon contacting the owner of the specimen, a collaborative proposal was established, and the description of this new taxon is herein presented.

Material and Methods

The exact locality of the specimen is unknown, but samples from Dominican amber are from the Oligocene-Miocene horizon, for which the deposition age is somewhere between 15 and 30 My (see discussions in Fanti and Pankowski 2021; Grimaldi 1994, 1996; Grimaldi and Engel 2004; Iturralde-Vinenti and MacPhee 2019; Poinar 2010). The specimen was compared with existing literature on West Indian and Neotropical Lycidae (Bocakova 2003, 2005; Ferreira and Ivie 2017, 2022; Kazantsev 2009, 2013, 2017; Leng and Mutchler 1922). Morphological terminology follows Bocak and Bocakova (1990), Kazantsev (2005), and Lawrence et al. (2011). Photos of the specimen were taken by Enrico Bonino (Extreme macro and Paleontology), following the protocol described on his website ( https://enrico-bonino.eu): images were produced with a camera SONY A7R II using an objective Mitutoyo 5× and a light system from Ogglab ( www.mjkzz.de/collections/light-solutions); images were stacked using Helicon Focus and enhancements to images were made in Adobe Photoshop® CC. The examined specimen will be deposited in the collection of the Civic Museum of Fossils of Besano (Besano, VA, Italy).

Results

Family Lycidae Laporte, 1836
Subfamily Lycinae Laporte, 1836
Tribe Calopterini Green, 1949
Genus Falsoceratoprion Ferreira, new genus
zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 505D4581-49AA-4E2B-AF87-DA7CAA4BAB61
Fig. 1

  • Type Species. Falsoceratoprion fumagalliae Ferreira, new species.

  • Etymology. The name refers to the similarity of the new genus to the Neotropical mainland genus Ceratoprion Gorham, 1884. Falso is a Latin word meaning false, deceiving.

  • Differential Diagnosis. Falsoceratoprion can be separated from all other known West Indian Lycidae (extant and fossil) by the combination of the following characteristics: distinctly serrate antennae (vs. subserrate or pectinate in Thonalmus Bourgeois, 1883; distinctly serrate in Mesopteron Bourgeois, 1905; subserrate, filiform, flabellate or pectinate in the Leptolycini), with the pedicel multiple times shorter than antennomere 3 (vs. variable across the different genera, usually pedicel and antennomere 3 subequal in length, with exceptions in the Leptolycini [pedicel much shorter than antennomere 3 in Cessator Kazantsev, 2009 and Dominopteron Kazantsev, 2013]); the apparently developed mouthparts (vs. standard mouthparts in all Thonalmus and Mesopteron; Leptolycini, with weakly developed mandibles that are seemingly absent, with either strongly reduced or absent labial palps).

  • Falsoceratoprion also has a subtrapezoidal pronotum, bearing an obscure fovea in the posterior portion (vs. usually subpentagonal in Thonalmus, bearing a distinct longitudinal carina in the anterior half and a cell in the posterior region; bearing a strongly visible longitudinal carina, entire through its full extent in Mesopteron; variable shapes in Leptolycini); the smooth elytra, not bearing any transverse costae nor presenting strongly developed cells (vs. overall strongly developed, irregular cells in Thonalmus; distinctly subquadrate and strongly developed cells in Mesopteron and Dominopteron; smooth elytra in all other Leptolycini); the strongly setose and dehiscent elytra (vs. variable across the groups, expanded apically or only weakly dehiscent in Thonalmus, usually glabrous; parallel-sided and bearing short setation in several Mesopteron; variable in the Leptolycini, which are overall dehiscent and densely setose in Electropteron Kazantsev, 2013) and for bearing three distinctly visible costae that are fused apically (vs. three costae in Thonalmus and Mesopteron; variable in the Leptolycini, but usually two-costate).

  • From the described Lycidae genera occurring on the Neotropical mainland, Falsoceratoprion is superficially similar to Ceratoprion, Ceratolycus Kazantsev, 2017, and Aplopteron Kazantsev, 2017, differing from these genera by possessing normally developed mouthparts (vs. weakly developed and strongly reduced labial palps in the mentioned genera), a densely setose body (vs. glabrous in the mentioned genera) and the pronotum not possessing a median longitudinal carina (vs. presence of a longitudinal carina in the mentioned genera, which has a cell in Ceratolycus and Aplopteron).

  • Description of Male. General coloration and setation: Thorax, head, coxae, base of femora and basal third of elytra pale yellow, remainder of body brown, body densely setose throughout (Fig. 1). Head: As long as wide, widest at eyes (Fig. 1A), hypognathous (Fig. 1B), frons posterior to antennal insertion strongly bulging (Fig. 1A), apparently concave behind eyes (Fig. 1A). Eyes hemispherical, projecting anterolaterally, coarsely granulate (Fig. 1). Mouthparts: Maxillary palp apparently four segmented (Fig. 1A); terminal maxillary palpomere elongate, spatulate (Fig. 1A). Antenna: With 11 antennomeres, from antennomere 3–10 distinctly serrate; densely setose, dorsoventrally flattened, inserted in gibbous prominence at anterior distal portion of head (Fig. 1); if in resting position, longer than body (Fig. 1); scape pyriform, approximate at base, subconical; pedicel ca. 4× shorter than scape; antennomeres 4–10 subequal, slightly increasing in length towards apex (Fig. 1A); antennomere 11 narrowly rounded apically (Fig. 1A). Thorax: Pronotum trapezoidal, transverse, lateral edges moderately developed (Fig. 1), posteriorly apparently bearing a weakly developed median fovea, median longitudinal carina apparently absent (Fig. 1A). Elytra: Dehiscent, weakly ligulate, 3-costate, with short bristle-like setae throughout (Fig. 1A); costae weakly developed, subparallel; costa I discontinued medially, costae II+III subapically fused (Fig. 1A). Abdomen: With eight ventrites; ventrite 7 shallowly notched medially; ventrite 8 lanceolate, apically blunt, ca. 4× longer than ventrite 7, ca. one-fourth longer than tergite 9 (Fig. 1B). Length (head + pronotum + elytra): 3.3 mm. Width (across humeri): 0.7 mm.

  • Fig. 1.

    Falsoceratoprion fumagalliae, new genus and new species. A) Dorsal view, B) Ventral view. Scale bar = 0.5 mm.

    img-z3-3_288.jpg

    Falsoceratoprion fumagalliae Ferreira, new species
    zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 2E4675DE-9C97-4C9F-B345-1E8498B7CBE5
    Fig. 1

  • Examined Material. Holotype: Falsoceratoprion fumagalliae Ferreira, new species. DOMINICAN AMBER: Oligo-Miocene, Dominican Republic. Specific locality: Unknown. The specimen is a well-preserved amber bead that had been polished prior to study. It will be deposited in the collection of the Civic Museum of Fossils of Besano (Besano, VA, Italy).

  • Description and Diagnosis. The diagnosis and description of F. fumagalliae is coextensive with the generic description and diagnosis.

  • Etymology. This species is named after Lorenzo Tettamanzi's grandmother, Giuseppina Fumagalli (1928–2017), who, together with her husband Silvio, has always encouraged and supported, with enormous love and enthusiasm, her grandson Lorenzo's passion for collecting fossils and minerals.

  • Discussion

    The absence of a median pronotal carina in Falsoceratoprion initially led us to think that this genus belonged to the tribe Leptolycini, which is endemic to the West Indies, where Dominican amber deposits originate (Masek et al. 2018). While the absence of a median pronotal carina is not exclusive to the Leptolycini, it can be diagnostic for this tribe when combined with the reduced mandibles, labial palps and simplified male genitalia of most genera of this clade (which includes absent parameres and/or a simple lanceolate median lobe; see Ferreira and Ivie 2022). However, a closer examination of the morphological features of Falsoceratoprion and comparison with the literature and specimens of Calopterini and Leptolycini allowed us to provide a justification for the placement of the genus in the Calopterini as currently understood (i.e., including several mainland Neotropical genera that have been historically treated as belonging to Leptolycini but are in fact Calopterini [all new genera listed in Kazantsev 2017; see discussion section in Ferreira and Silveira 2020]).

    Falsoceratoprion's combination of apparent fully developed mouthparts (Fig. 1B), its well-defined 3-costate elytra (Fig. 1A) and strongly serrate antennae (Fig. 1) has never been encountered in any “true” Leptolycini (i.e., West Indian Leptolycini). While these characters are not synapomorphic in Calopterini, they can be used to characterize the tribe as currently understood. The only defining character of Calopterini not present in Falsoceratoprion is the strongly developed median pronotal longitudinal carina, which is indistinct in Falsoceratoprion; however, this character can be plastic within the tribe (e.g., see review of pronota in Bocakova 2003). Even though Falsoceratoprion's placement in the Calopterini is tentative, with its description we expect to draw attention to the fossil record of this group in Dominican amber, with the hope that more fossil specimens of this tribe will be found in the future. The discovery of Falsoceratoprion provides direct evidence of Calopterini with apparent paedomorphic features in the Oligocene-Miocene horizon. This fossil's potential inclusion in future phylogenetic analyses as a calibration point can improve estimates regarding the timing of origin for the Calopterini and an understanding of the tribe's biogeography.

    Acknowledgments

    We are very grateful to Enrico Bonino (Extreme macro and Paleontology) for taking photographs of the specimen and sharing it on Facebook. We are also very grateful to Fabrizio Fanti for putting the authors in touch so that this collaboration was enabled. This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 101018841 (postdoctoral fellowship of Vinicius S. Ferreira).

    References Cited

    1.

    Bocak, L., and M. Bocakova. 1990. Revision of the suprageneric classification of the family Lycidae (Coleoptera). Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne 59: 623–676. Google Scholar

    2.

    Bocak, L., and M. Bocakova. 2008. Phylogeny and classification of the family Lycidae (Insecta: Coleoptera). Annales Zoologici 58(4): 695–720. Google Scholar

    3.

    Bocakova, M. 2003. Revision of the tribe Calopterini (Coleoptera, Lycidae). Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 38: 207–234. Google Scholar

    4.

    Bocakova, M. 2005. Phylogeny and classification of the tribe Calopterini (Coleoptera, Lycidae). Insect Systematics and Evolution 35: 437–447. Google Scholar

    5.

    Darlington, P. J. 1938. Experiments on mimicry in Cuba, with suggestions for future study. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 87(23): 681–695. Google Scholar

    6.

    Eisner, T., F. C. Schroeder, N. Snyder, J. B. Grant, D. J. Aneshansley, D. Utterback, J. Meinwald, and M. Eisner. 2008. Defensive chemistry of lycid beetles and of mimetic cerambycid beetles that feed on them. Chemoecology 18: 109–119. Google Scholar

    7.

    Fanti, F., and M. G. Pankowski. 2021. Two new species of soldier beetles (Coleoptera, Cantharidae), the first from the tribe Silini in Dominican amber. Zootaxa 4996(1): 163–170. Google Scholar

    8.

    Ferreira, V. S., M. V. L. Barclay, and M. A. Ivie. 2018. Redescription of Aporrhipis Pascoe, 1887 (Coleoptera: Lycidae) with a discussion of its tribal placement. The Coleopterists Bulletin 72(2): 371–375. Google Scholar

    9.

    Ferreira, V. S., and M. A. Ivie. 2017. The first fossil species of the extant genus Cessator Kazantsev (Coleoptera: Lycidae): A new Leptolycini from Dominican amber. The Coleopterists Bulletin 71: 57–60. Google Scholar

    10.

    Ferreira, V. S., and M. A. Ivie. 2022. Lessons from a museum's cabinet: DNA barcoding and collections-based life stage associations reveals a hidden diversity in the Puerto Rican Bank paedomorphic Lycidae (Coleoptera, Elateroidea). Insect Systematics and Diversity 6(3), 2.  doi.org/10.1093/isd/ixac006Google Scholar

    11.

    Ferreira, V. S., and L. F. L. Silveira. 2020. A new paedomorphic genus of net-winged beetles from the Atlantic Rainforest (Coleoptera, Elateroidea, Lycidae). Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia 60(special issue), e202060(s.i.).35. Google Scholar

    12.

    Ferreira, V. S., A. Solodvnikov, M. A. Ivie, and R. Kundrata. 2022. Dominican amber net-winged beetles suggest stable paleoenvironment as a driver for conserved morphology in a paedomorphic lineage. Scientific Reports 12, 5820.  doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09867-6Google Scholar

    13.

    Grimaldi, D. A. 1994. The age of Dominican amber [pp. 203–217]. In: Amber, Resinite, and Fossil Resins ( K. B. Anderson and J. C. Crelling, editors). American Chemical Society, Washington, DC. Google Scholar

    14.

    Grimaldi, D. A. 1996. Amber: Window to the Past. Abrams/American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY. Google Scholar

    15.

    Grimaldi, D. A., and M. S. Engel. 2004. Evolution of the Insects. Cambridge, New York, NY. Google Scholar

    16.

    Iturralde-Vinenti, M. A., and R. D. E. MacPhee. 2019. Remarks on the age of Dominican amber. Palaeoentomology 2(3): 236–240. Google Scholar

    17.

    Kazantsev, S. V. 2005. Morphology of Lycidae with some considerations on evolution of the Coleoptera. Elytron 17: 49–226. Google Scholar

    18.

    Kazantsev, S. V. 2009. Leptolycini of Puerto Rico (Coleoptera: Lycidae). Russian Entomological Journal 18(2): 87–95. Google Scholar

    19.

    Kazantsev, S. V. 2013. New and little-known taxa of “neotenic” Lycidae (Coleoptera), with discussion of their phylogeny. Russian Entomological Journal 22: 9–31. Google Scholar

    20.

    Kazantsev, S. V. 2017. New leptolycines from Ecuador and Peru (Coleoptera: Lycidae). Russian Entomological Journal 26: 127–146. Google Scholar

    21.

    Kazantsev, S. V. 2020. First fossil representative of the net-winged beetles genus Plateros Bourgeois, 1879 (Insecta: Coleoptera: Lycidae) from Mexican amber, with redescription of Electropteron avus gen.n., sp.n. from Dominican amber and a note on the time of origin of the family. Russian Entomological Journal 29(4): 377–387. Google Scholar

    22.

    Lawrence, J. F., A. Ślipiński, A. E. Seago, M. K. Thayer, A. F. Newton, and A. E. Marvaldi. 2011. Phylogeny of the Coleoptera based on morphological characters of adults and larvae. Annales Zoologici 61: 1–217. Google Scholar

    23.

    Leng, C. W., and A. J. Mutchler. 1922. The Lycidae, Lampyridae and Cantharidae (Telephoridae) of the West Indies. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 46: 413–499. Google Scholar

    24.

    Li, Y., E. Tihelka, D. Huang, and C. Cai. 2021. Murcybolus gen. nov., a new net-winged beetle genus from mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber (Coleoptera: Lycidae: Burmolycini). Zootaxa 4966(1): 77–83. Google Scholar

    25.

    Masek, M., M. Motyka, D. Kusy, M. Bocek, Y. Li, and L. Bocak. 2018. Molecular phylogeny, diversity and zoogeography of net-winged beetles (Coleoptera: Lycidae). Insects 9, 154. Google Scholar

    26.

    Poinar, G., Jr. 2010. Palaeoecological perspectives in Dominican amber. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 46(1–2): 23–52. Google Scholar
    Vinicius S. Ferreira and Lorenzo Tettamanzi "Falsoceratoprion fumagalliae, New Genus and Species: The First Calopterini from Dominican Amber (Coleoptera: Lycidae)," The Coleopterists Bulletin 76(2), 288-292, (21 June 2022). https://doi.org/10.1649/0010-065X-76.2.288
    Received: 25 December 2021; Accepted: 22 April 2022; Published: 21 June 2022
    JOURNAL ARTICLE
    5 PAGES


    Share
    SHARE
    KEYWORDS
    Elateroidea
    Leptolycini
    neotropical
    Platerodini
    Thonalmini
    RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
    Get copyright permission
    Back to Top