INTRODUCTION

In Condor 110/2 (May 2008), Figure 2 on p. 290 of the paper "Reevaluating marine diets of Surf and White-winged Scoters: interspecific differences and the importance of soft-bodied prey," by Eric M. Anderson et al. did not print correctly due to a combination of insufficient figure resolution and composition of the original figure. The correct figure appears below. The authors and editors regret the error.

FIGURE 2.

(A) Lengths of whole bivalves (n = 104) consumed by scoters collected in Puget Sound, Washington, in 2005--2006. (B) Averages (±SE) across this and past studies (number of studies within each bar) for the mean and maximum lengths of bivalves in esophagus + gizzard contents for Surf and White-winged Scoters. (C) Average percent of diet across this and past studies comprised of hard-bodied prey (mollusks) for Surf and White-winged Scoters. In (C), medians and means are represented by solid and dashed lines, respectively; boxes indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles, and whiskers the 10th and 90th percentiles (the circle is an outlier).*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

i0010-5422-110-3-597-f02.gif
"Erratum," The Condor 110(3), 597, (1 August 2008). https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2008.110.3.erratum
Published: 1 August 2008
Back to Top