Translator Disclaimer
23 December 2015 Interspecific aggression by the Swainson's Thrush ( Catharus ustulatus) may limit the distribution of the threatened Bicknell's Thrush ( Catharus bicknelli) in the Adirondack Mountains
Author Affiliations +

Bicknell's Thrush (Catharus bicknelli) is a threatened species that inhabits high-elevation spruce–fir forests in the northeastern United States. Bicknell's Thrush populations are predicted to shift upslope in response to global warming, leading to local extinctions on mountains that lack the elevational extent to accommodate such shifts. However, biotic interactions may influence how montane species respond to changing abiotic conditions. In territorial songbirds, for example, aggression from dominant low-elevation species has been hypothesized to combine with warming temperatures to “push” populations of subordinate montane species upslope at a faster rate than in the absence of interspecific aggression. This “push” hypothesis could apply to Bicknell's Thrushes: the related Swainson's Thrush (Catharus ustulatus) inhabits lower elevations, Bicknell's Thrushes are largely confined to mountaintops, and interspecific aggression by Swainson's Thrushes toward Bicknell's Thrushes has been anecdotally reported. We used reciprocal playback experiments to test whether patterns of interspecific aggression in Swainson's and Bicknell's thrushes along an elevational gradient in the Adirondack Mountains were consistent with the “push” hypothesis. We found weak asymmetrical interspecific aggression: Some Swainson's Thrush individuals at high elevations where the 2 species co-occurred responded aggressively to Bicknell's Thrush playback, and Bicknell's Thrushes did not respond aggressively to Swainson's Thrush playback. While Swainson's and Bicknell's thrushes appeared to regularly occupy overlapping home ranges, asymmetrical interspecific aggression from a lower-elevation species is consistent with the “push” hypothesis and suggests that interspecific aggression from Swainson's Thrushes may be a factor limiting Bicknell's Thrush populations in the Adirondack Mountains. More broadly, this case example supports the recent call to incorporate biotic interactions in models that predict montane species' responses to climate change.


Bicknell's Thrush (Catharus bicknelli) is a migratory songbird that breeds in dense, high-elevation red spruce–balsam fir forests in the mountains of the northeastern United States and at both low and high elevations in Quebec and the Maritime Provinces in Canada (Atwood et al. 1996, Rimmer et al. 2015). Now considered a separate species from Gray-cheeked Thrush (C. minimus; Oullet 1993), Bicknell's Thrush is classified as vulnerable by the IUCN due to observed population declines and threats to its habitat such as climate change (Lambert et al. 2008). Global warming is causing most montane species across the globe to shift upslope (Chen et al. 2011), and upslope shifts driven by temperature increases are predicted to lead to local extinctions of species currently restricted to mountaintop environments, such as Bicknell's Thrush (Sekercioglu et al. 2008, La Sorte and Jetz 2010). Bicknell's Thrush populations have declined or disappeared from some smaller mountains in the northeastern United States, possibly in relation to recent climate change (Lambert et al. 2008), and climatic niche models predict that Bicknell's Thrushes will disappear from the northeastern United States by 2080 in response to continued warming (Lambert et al. 2005, Rodenhouse et al. 2008, Ralston and Kirchman 2013).

However, the prediction that climate change will lead to the extinction of Bicknell's Thrushes in the northeastern United States assumes that abiotic factors (and not biotic interactions or interactions between biotic and abiotic factors) are the dominant factors limiting the elevational distribution of Bicknell's Thrush. In general, relatively little is known about how biotic factors influence species' warming-associated elevational shifts (Thomas 2010, HilleRisLambers et al. 2013, Wisz et al. 2013). One biotic factor that could potentially influence the distribution of Bicknell's Thrushes is interspecific competition. Several Catharus species live in northeastern North America, and patterns of broad-scale distributions suggest that interspecific competition can influence Catharus elevational distributions (Noon 1981). For example, Catharus species inhabit distinct elevational zones with relatively small zones of overlap on many mountain slopes in this region (Able and Noon 1976). The widespread Swainson's Thrush (Catharus ustulatus) replaces Bicknell's Thrush at lower elevations along some transects in the Adirondack Mountains in the northeastern United States, a pattern hypothesized in part to reflect interspecific competition (Able and Noon 1976). Moreover, interspecific aggression between Bicknell's and Swainson's thrushes has been reported, with preliminary data suggesting that Swainson's Thrush is behaviorally dominant in this interaction (Able and Noon 1976). One hypothesis that could explain these observations is that the elevational distribution of Bicknell's Thrushes is limited by interspecific competition from Swainson's Thrushes mediated by interspecific aggression. In the context of global warming, if the outcome of interspecific competition is directly or indirectly dependent on temperature (Davis et al. 1998, Helland et al. 2011, Carmona-Catot et al. 2013), aggression from a dominant lowland species could “push” a subordinate montane species upslope over time as temperatures increase (alternatively, if the montane species is behaviorally dominant, it could persist as a “king of the mountain”; Jankowski et al. 2010).

If the “push” scenario is occurring in interspecific interactions between Bicknell's and Swainson's thrushes, we can make 3 primary predictions: (1) interspecific aggression exists between Swainson's and Bicknell's thrushes; (2) interspecific aggression is asymmetrical, with Swainson's Thrushes dominating Bicknell's Thrushes; and (3) asymmetrical interspecific aggression from Swainson's Thrushes interacts with abiotic factors (i.e. temperature) to influence the elevational distribution of Bicknell's Thrushes. We used reciprocal playback experiments to test whether the first 2 predictions of the “push” hypothesis were supported in interspecific interactions between Swainson's and Bicknell's thrushes in the Adirondack Mountains in New York State, USA.


Study Species

Swainson's and Bicknell's thrushes, the 2 focal species of this study (Figure 1), both breed in the Adirondack Mountains in New York State (McGowan and Corwan 2008). The 2 species defend home ranges through physical (approaching and chasing intruders) and vocal (singing and calling) behavior, with vocal activity concentrated at dawn and dusk (Mack and Yong 2000, Rimmer et al. 2015). The territorial system of Swainson's Thrushes remains poorly studied, while Bicknell's Thrush has an unusual mating system in which multiple paternity appears to be common and nestlings are fed by multiple males (Goetz et al. 2003). Related to this system, Bicknell's Thrush males have large home ranges that are not necessarily strictly defended, while females hold exclusive territories (Goetz et al. 2003). During the breeding season, both species forage for insects on or near the forest floor (Mack and Yong 2000, Rimmer et al. 2015), although Swainson's Thrushes also use gleaning and hawking to capture insects more readily than Bicknell's Thrushes (Holmes and Robinson 1988). Swainson's Thrushes are slightly larger than Bicknell's Thrushes (e.g., for after-hatch-year [AHY] males in northeastern North America, average mass = 29.1 g vs. 27.8 g; Mack and Yong 2000, Rimmer et al. 2015).


(A) Bicknell's Thrush (Catharus bicknelli) and (B) Swainson's Thrush (C. ustulatus) co-occur in the mountains of northeastern North America. They are phenotypically similar, but differ in song, elevational distribution, and habitat preference. Photo credit: (A) Ian Davies, and (B) Graham Montgomery


The 2 species have somewhat divergent habitat preferences and elevational distributions in the northeastern United States. Bicknell's Thrushes nest in dense, high-elevation (>915 m) red spruce–balsam fir forests (see Lambert et al. 2005 for details), and Swainson's Thrushes reach their highest densities in northeastern North America at middle elevations of ca. 800–1,200 m (Able and Noon 1976, Noon 1981). While Swainson's and Bicknell's thrushes co-occur in coniferous montane forests of the northeastern United States, Swainson's Thrushes inhabit relatively lower elevations than Bicknell's Thrushes, with variable amounts of elevational overlap (Able and Noon 1976; see Nixon et al. 2001) for a Canadian study site.

Playback Experiments

We conducted reciprocal playback experiments (Table 1) from June 1 to June 13, 2014, on 2 mountains in the High Peaks region of the Adirondack Mountains in New York State (Porter Mountain and Mt. Marcy; respective coordinates: 44.2156, −73.8444 and 44.1172, −73.9153). Song playback experiments are an appropriate method to measure interspecific aggression in Catharus, as aggression in this group is primarily based on vocal (rather than visual) signals (Dilger 1956, Noon 1981). We first compiled natural vocalizations recorded from northeastern North America for both species from the Macaulay Library (Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York, USA; and (n = 6 and n = 9 songs for Bicknell's and Swainson's thrushes, respectively). To minimize pseudoreplication, we arbitrarily selected specific recordings for use in individual playback trials (Kroodsma 1989). We assumed that singing birds were defending home ranges (because Bicknell's Thrushes do not adhere to typical territorial behavior for passerines, we use the term “home range” rather than “territory”), and initiated playback experiments by placing a Pignose amplifier (Pignose-Gorilla, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA; hereafter, “speaker”) within ~25 m of where we had located a singing bird, typically within 5 min of detecting the singing bird. The speaker was attached to an iPod (Apple, Cupertino, California, USA) via a 12 m audio cable, allowing observers to document the behavioral response (if any) of individuals to playback trials while hiding ~10 m from the speaker. We conducted most playback experiments in the morning (04:45–11:00), but also performed a small number of evening experiments (17:45–20:45).


The number of playback experiments completed for Swainson's and Bicknell's thrushes. Some playback experiments elicited behavioral responses from both species in a comparison, and are denoted as species = “Both.” “Elevational range” is the range of elevations at which we conducted playback experiments for a given species within a particular species pair, not the overall elevational distribution of the species at our study site.


Playback experiments included 3 trials: control, conspecific, and heterospecific. The control trial was performed first, and consisted of 2 min of playback of the song of a resident chickadee (Poecile) species followed by 5 min of behavioral observation. Poecile species are unlikely to compete with Catharus species due to differences in diet, foraging behavior, and foraging strata. In our study area, Black-capped Chickadees (P. atricapillus) are largely replaced by Boreal Chickadees (P. hudsonicus) above 1,000 m. We thus used Black-capped Chickadee recordings (n = 8) as our control for sites located below 1,000 m, and Boreal Chickadee recordings (n = 5) at sites above 1,000 m. We then conducted conspecific and heterospecific trials, alternating the relative order of trials (conspecific before heterospecific and vice versa) between playback experiments. These trials also consisted of 2 min of playback followed by 5 min of behavioral observation. All playback trials for a given location were performed sequentially in a single 21-min session.

We quantified the following behavioral responses to playback for each trial: closest approach to the speaker (m; hereafter “closest approach”), latency to approach the speaker (s), latency of vocal response (s), and number of vocalizations (summed songs and calls; Jankowski et al. 2010, Freeman 2015). We measured closest approach as a continuous variable bounded by 0 m (if the responding bird perched on the speaker) and 15 m (the maximum distance at which we could reasonably detect an individual approaching the speaker in dense understory vegetation). We estimated closest approach by eye during the course of playback trials and later checked our visual estimates by pacing off the distance between the speaker and the location of the responding bird's nearest approach. We measured latency to approach as the time elapsed prior to the first approach made to within 15 m of the speaker by an individual of the focal species. We quantified latency to vocalize as the time elapsed before the first vocalization (song or call) of the focal species that we heard after initiating playback, and the number of vocalizations as the summed total of songs and calls given by the responding individual(s) of the focal species. When we did not observe individuals approach the speaker in response to playback, we categorized the closest approach to the speaker as 15 m and the latency to approach the speaker as 420 s (the summed total of the 2 min of playback and 5 min of observation). Similarly, we categorized latency of vocal response as 420 s when we did not hear vocalizations in response to playback trials.

During a portion of the playback experiments at elevations where the 2 thrush species co-occurred, individuals of both species approached the speaker within an experiment. For example, in an experiment designed to test Bicknell's Thrush responses to conspecific vs. heterospecific song, Bicknell's Thrushes approached the speaker in response to Bicknell's Thrush playback, however Swainson's Thrushes approached the speaker in response to Swainson's Thrush playback (and vice versa). We did not include these experiments in our statistical analyses for 2 reasons. First, we could not identify which species to designate as the putative home-range owner. Second, we could not distinguish between behavioral response to heterospecific playback and behavioral response to the physical presence of a congeneric individual(s). However, such trials indicated spatial overlap between thrush species and also brought individuals of 2 species into close proximity, offering opportunities to observe direct interspecific aggression (e.g., chases). We thus report the frequency of trials in which both thrush species responded (Table 1), as well as observations gleaned from such events (see Results).

Statistical Analysis

We conducted all statistical analysis in R (R Development Core Team 2014). We constructed a linear mixed regression model to analyze species' behavioral responses to playback trials. We used a principal components analysis (PCA) to collapse variation in multiple behavioral response variables (closest approach, latency to approach, latency to vocalize, and number of vocalizations) into a single metric. The first PC axis (PC1) explained ~61% of the variance (PC1 loadings: closest approach to the speaker = −0.56, latency to approach the speaker = −0.57, latency to vocalize = −0.44, number of vocalizations = 0.40); high PC1 values were associated with playback trials that resulted in close approaches, low latencies to approach and vocalize, and a greater number of vocalizations. We therefore considered PC1 to be representative of a composite aggression score, and used PC1 as our response variable in linear mixed models. We included the following fixed effects: category, a categorical variable with 6 factors (conspecific, heterospecific, and control trials for both Swainson's and Bicknell's thrushes); a category × elevation interaction to test whether responses to playback varied along the elevational gradient for different categories; and trial order (conspecific before heterospecific and vice versa), to evaluate whether the order of playback trials influenced behavioral responses. Using “category” as a fixed effect facilitates the interpretation of model parameters, and is statistically equivalent to an alternative formulation that includes species, trial, and a species × trial interaction as predictor variables instead of as a “category.” To account for the fact that individuals may vary in their responses to playback (given that each individual received 3 playback trials), we included experiment location as a random effect. To test whether playback order influenced behavioral responses, we evaluated models using Bayesian Information Criteria (BIC; Burnham 2004) to determine whether models with the order term outperformed models lacking this term. We then conducted all analyses using the model that was best supported by BIC.


Both Swainson's and Bicknell's thrushes responded to conspecific playback by rapidly approaching the speaker to within a few meters and subsequently vocalizing (Table 2). A minority of Swainson's Thrush individuals (25%; 9 out of 36) approached the speaker in response to heterospecific playback, with similar latencies to approach and vocalize to those in response to conspecific playback (Table 2). In contrast, only 1 out of 16 (6%) Bicknell's Thrushes approached the speaker in response to heterospecific trials (Table 2). Individuals rarely approached the speaker in response to control playback of chickadee song, but frequently vocalized during control trials (Table 2), most likely because our fieldwork occurred during the early breeding season when thrush species are highly vocal (and because we used the presence of singing birds to locate sites for playback experiments). Thus, vocal response to control trials appears to represent the background rate of vocalization. Still, aggressive responses were characterized by increased vocalization; individuals sang more songs in response to conspecific playback than control playback, and the number of songs loaded positively on PC1 (our aggression score).


Behavioral responses of Swainson's and Bicknell's thrushes to playback trials. Means and standard deviations for each behavioral response variable for each playback trial are shown. To facilitate comparisons, behavioral responses of Swainson's Thrushes to heterospecific trials are presented separately for responders (n = 9) and nonresponders (n = 27). All individuals approached the speaker in response to conspecific trials; individuals that did not respond to a heterospecific or control trial were classified as closest approach = 15 m and latency to approach and vocalize = 420 s.


The model without the trial order term was preferred in model selection (without order term, BIC = 477.33; with order term, BIC = 485.61), indicating that the relative order of conspecific vs. heterospecific playback trials did not significantly influence behavioral response to playback. We thus used the simpler model that did not include the order term (Table 3), and found a strong positive relationship for the interaction between elevation and Swainson's Thrush response to heterospecific playback (Table 3; approximate 95% confidence interval of slope = 0.0028–0.0059). This finding indicates that Swainson's Thrushes at higher elevations showed greater aggression to Bicknell's Thrush playback than Swainson's Thrushes at lower elevations. Swainson's Thrushes also showed a weaker, but statistically significant, positive relationship between response to conspecific playback and elevation (Table 3; approximate 95% confidence interval of slope = 0.0002–0.0034), suggesting that Swainson's Thrushes at higher elevations are more aggressive than individuals at lower elevations. We displayed these results by plotting the model predictions (and raw data) of aggression scores by category and elevation (Figure 2). In the upper reaches of their elevational distribution (~1,200–1,400 m), Swainson's Thrushes had significantly higher aggression scores in heterospecific trials compared with control trials (but higher aggression scores in conspecific trials than in heterospecific trials; Figure 2; see also Figure 3, which shows a similar pattern in the raw data for closest approach to speaker).


Parameter estimates with standard errors (SE) for fixed effects in the linear mixed regression model predicting aggression score (PC1) in response to playback trials for Swainson's and Bicknell's thrushes. Interpretation of trial-type parameter estimates requires care, as “Intercept” is the mean of a factor level (in this case “Bicknell's Thrush conspecific”), and other “category” factors describe deviations from this intercept value.



Aggression scores for (A) Swainson's and (B) Bicknell's thrushes by playback trial category. Trend lines with 95% confidence intervals illustrate model predictions for each category. Raw data are plotted as points. Note that x-axis (but not y-axis) scales differ between panels.



Closest approach to speaker by playback trial category for (A) Swainson's and (B) Bicknell's thrushes. Close approaches represent aggressive responses to playback; trials in which we did not observe an approach to the speaker were coded as 15 m. Note that x-axis (but not y-axis) scales differ between panels.


Finally, Swainson's and Bicknell's thrushes both responded to playback in 13 trials at higher elevations (i.e. in an experiment designed to test Bicknell's Thrush responses to conspecific vs. heterospecific song, Bicknell's Thrushes approached the speaker in response to Bicknell's Thrush playback, however Swainson's Thrushes approached the speaker in response to Swainson's Thrush playback (and vice versa) (Table 1). This suggests that Swainson's and Bicknell's thrushes regularly occupy overlapping home ranges in high-elevation coniferous forests in the Adirondack Mountains. Despite this high proportion of our experiments that brought the 2 putative competitors together, we did not observe unequivocal attacks or chases between Swainson's and Bicknell's thrushes, although such interactions may have occurred without our knowledge if they occurred at greater distances from the speaker than we could view.


We demonstrated asymmetrical interspecific aggression between Swainson's and Bicknell's thrushes along an elevational gradient in the Adirondack Mountains in northeastern North America. Our results are consistent with the “push” hypothesis—We found that some individuals of the lower-elevation species (Swainson's Thrush) responded aggressively to playback of the upper-elevation species (Bicknell's Thrush), but not vice versa (Figures 2 and 3). This asymmetrical aggression suggests that Swainson's Thrushes are behaviorally dominant to Bicknell's Thrushes, a result that may have implications for Bicknell's Thrush conservation.

The “push” hypothesis predicts that aggression from dominant low-elevation species may accelerate warming-driven upslope shifts of subordinate high-elevation species. At our study site, climatic niche models predict that 14 of 15 breeding montane bird species, including both Bicknell's and Swainson's thrushes, will disappear by 2080 in response to continued warming (Ralston and Kirchman 2013). These predictions assume that climate alone limits species' elevational distributions. The extent to which Catharus species' distributions are limited by abiotic factors remains unknown, although Bicknell's Thrushes appear to be significantly better adapted metabolically to cold temperatures than other Catharus species, including Swainson's Thrush (Holmes and Sawyer 1975). In conjunction with our behavioral data, this suggests a scenario wherein biotic (Swainson's Thrushes are behaviorally dominant to Bicknell's Thrushes) and abiotic (Bicknell's Thrushes perform better in cold, high-elevation environments) factors have combined to influence the current elevational distribution of Bicknell's Thrush. While speculative, a warming climate may allow Swainson's Thrushes to compete for high-elevation sites, negating the physiological adaptations to colder climates that have allowed Bicknell's Thrushes to remain the dominant Catharus at high elevations up to the present time, a possibility that should be considered when predicting the future distribution of Bicknell's Thrush. We also note that the high-elevation spruce–fir forest preferred by Bicknell's Thrushes has moved downslope in recent decades on mountains in Vermont and New Hampshire, USA, despite temperature increases (Foster and D'Amato 2015). This counterintuitive finding suggests that Bicknell's Thrush habitat may actually be expanding, at least within some montane regions of the northeastern United States, potentially explaining the observation that high-elevation songbirds have moved downslope in recent decades on the White Mountains in New Hampshire (Deluca 2013).

That Swainson's and Bicknell's thrushes interact aggressively is not unexpected, as previous research has documented that interspecific aggression occurs at least occasionally between these 2 species (Able and Noon 1976). We found that Swainson's Thrushes showed interspecific aggression toward Bicknell's Thrushes only at high elevations where both species were found (Figure 2); Swainson's Thrushes at slightly lower elevations on the same mountain where Bicknell's Thrushes were not present did not show interspecific aggression. This pattern occurred over small spatial scales, and suggests that interspecific aggression by Swainson's Thrushes is a learned response to the presence of a dense population of a competitor (Bicknell's Thrush) at high elevations, rather than misdirected intraspecific aggression (e.g., Murray 1971) or an evolved response to a competitor. This pattern may also reflect, in part, increased overall aggression of Swainson's Thrushes that live at upper elevations, as high-elevation Swainson's Thrushes also showed greater aggression toward conspecific playback than low-elevation Swainson's Thrushes (Table 3, Figure 2). More study is needed to clarify the degree to which Swainson's Thrushes influence Bicknell's Thrushes, e.g., by measuring whether home-range overlap between the 2 species correlates with Bicknell's Thrush reproductive success, or, if feasible, through small-scale removal experiments. Successful Bicknell's Thrush conservation will ultimately depend on protecting their wintering habitat in Hispaniola (Townsend et al. 2009, Rimmer et al. 2015), improved monitoring (Lambert et al. 2008), and, where possible, mitigating the effects of climate change (Lambert and McFarland 2004, Rodenhouse et al. 2008, Rimmer et al. 2015).

Our results should be interpreted through the lens of the unusual breeding biology of Bicknell's Thrush. For example, playback experiments (including ours in this study) typically take the form of simulated territorial intrusions, but Bicknell's Thrushes do not exhibit typical passerine territorial behavior. Instead, Bicknell's Thrush males call and sing from several perches, but show little physical defense of these areas (Goetz et al. 2003) and have large home ranges (5.5–12.0 ha) that often overlap extensively, while females are territorial and defend home ranges (3.2–5.4 ha) against other females (Collins 2007). While we were unable to determine the sex of Bicknell's Thrushes that responded aggressively to conspecific playback, these data suggest that such individuals may typically have been females rather than males. The fact that Bicknell's Thrushes (typically a single bird, but sometimes 2 or 3 individuals) responded to conspecific playback by approaching the speaker demonstrates that our experiment successfully generated aggressive responses to playback, despite this species' complex breeding and spatial system. We also note that the breeding and spatial system of Swainson's Thrush is poorly understood (Mack and Yong 2000), and may not necessarily be a typical passerine system with social monogamy and male territorial defense.

While Swainson's Thrushes appear to be behaviorally dominant over Bicknell's Thrushes, interspecific interactions between other Catharus species are likely more complex. At lower elevations in the Adirondack Mountains, Swainson's Thrushes overlap with Hermit Thrushes (C. guttatus), and we recorded incidental observations during the course of our study of Hermit Thrushes responding aggressively to Swainson's Thrush playback, including physically attacking a Swainson's Thrush on one occasion. This suggests the possibility that Hermit Thrushes are behaviorally dominant to Swainson's Thrushes, and future field playback experiments should investigate behavioral interactions between Hermit and Swainson's thrushes, and possibly also Veeries (C. fuscescens) and Wood Thrushes (Hylocichla mustelina), that occur at low elevations in the Adirondack Mountains and across the northeastern United States (Noon 1981).

In conclusion, we documented asymmetrical interspecific aggression by the lower-elevation Swainson's Thrush toward the upper-elevation Bicknell's Thrush in the Adirondack Mountains that was strongest at the higher elevations where these 2 species co-occurred. We found that both species co-occurred over a wide range of elevations at our study site (Table 1), and that Swainson's and Bicknell's thrushes appeared to regularly occupy overlapping home ranges in dense coniferous habitat at relatively high elevations (as they do on lower-elevation mountains in New Brunswick, Canada; Nixon et al. 2001), demonstrating that interspecific interactions did not lead to complete spatial separation of these 2 species. In light of this, behavioral interaction with Swainson's Thrushes may be one of many factors that limits the current distribution of Bicknell's Thrushes. Further experiments are necessary to test the degree to which interspecific aggression limits the distribution of Bicknell's Thrush, and whether the outcome of aggressive interactions between the 2 species is dependent on temperature. Nevertheless, our results are broadly consistent with the “push” hypothesis, and add to a growing body of evidence suggesting that biotic interactions may limit the distributions of montane birds (Jankowski et al. 2010, Caro et al. 2013, Freeman and Mason 2015) and therefore should be incorporated into models that predict species' responses to climate change.


We are indebted to F. B. Gill for logistical assistance, and thank O. Damaj and A. M. Class Freeman for fieldwork. We thank 2 anonymous reviewers for comments that greatly improved this manuscript.

Funding statement: A Kieckhefer Adirondack Fellowship to B.G.F. supported this research. This material is also based upon work supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. 2011083591 to B.G.F. Neither of the funders had any input into the content of the manuscript, nor required approval of the manuscript prior to submission or publication.

Ethics statement: We adhered to the Guidelines to the Use of Wild Birds in Research and minimized adverse impacts on experimental subjects and the environment.

Author contributions: B.G.F. conceived the idea, design, and experiment; B.G.F. and G.A.M. performed the experiments, collected data, and conducted the research; B.G.F. and G.A.M. wrote the paper; B.G.F. developed or designed the methods; B.G.F. analyzed the data; and B.G.F. contributed substantial materials, resources, or funding.


  1. K. P. Ableand B. R. Noon (1976). Avian community structure along elevational gradients in the northeastern United States. Oecologia 26:275–294. Google Scholar

  2. J. L. Atwood C. C. Rimmer K. P. McFarland S. H. Tsaiand L. R. Nagy (1996). Distribution of Bicknell's Thrush in New England and New York. Wilson Bulletin 108:650–661. Google Scholar

  3. K. P. Burnham (2004). Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods and Research 33:261–304. Google Scholar

  4. G. Carmona-Catot K. Magellanand E. García-Berthou (2013). Temperature-specific competition between invasive mosquitofish and an endangered cyprinodontid fish. PLOS One 8: e54734. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054734 Google Scholar

  5. L. M. Caro P. C. Caycedo-Rosales R. C. K. Bowie H. Slabbekoornand C. D. Cadena (2013). Ecological speciation along an elevational gradient in a tropical passerine bird? Journal of Evolutionary Biology 26:357–374. Google Scholar

  6. I.-C. Chen J. K. Hill R. Ohlemüller D. B. Royand C. D. Thomas (2011). Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming. Science 333:1024–1026. Google Scholar

  7. B. B. Collins (2007). Spatial analysis of home range, movement patterns, and behavioral ecology of Bicknell's Thrush (Catharus bicknelli) in Vermont. M.S. thesis, Antioch University New England, Keene, NH, USA. Google Scholar

  8. A. J. Davis L. S. Jenkinson J. H. Lawton B. Shorrocksand S. Wood (1998). Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming. Nature 391:783–786. Google Scholar

  9. W. V. Deluca (2013). Ecology and conservation of the montane forest avian community in northeastern North America. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts–Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA. Google Scholar

  10. W. Dilger (1956). The hostile behavior and reproductive isolating mechanisms in the avian genera Catharus and Hylocichla. The Auk 73:313–353. Google Scholar

  11. J. R. Fosterand A. W. D'Amato (2015). Montane forest ecotones moved downslope in northeastern USA in spite of warming between 1984 and 2011. Global Change Biology. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13046 Google Scholar

  12. B. Freeman (2015). Strong asymmetric aggression between two sympatric New Guinean robins. Ibis. doi: 10.1111/ibi.12318Google Scholar

  13. B. Freemanand N. A. Mason (2015). The geographic distribution of a tropical montane bird is limited by a tree: Acorn Woodpeckers (Melanerpes formicivorus) and Colombian oaks (Quercus humboldtii) in the Northern Andes. PLOS One 10: e0128675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128675 Google Scholar

  14. J. E. Goetz K. P. McFarlandand C. C. Rimmer (2003). Multiple paternity and multiple male feeders in Bicknell's Thrush (Catharus bicknelli). The Auk 120:1044–1053. Google Scholar

  15. I. P. Helland A. G. Finstad T. Forseth T. Hesthagenand O. Ugedal (2011). Ice-cover effects on competitive interactions between two fish species. Journal of Animal Ecology 80:539–547. Google Scholar

  16. J. HilleRisLambers M. A. Harsch A. K. Ettinger K. R. Fordand E. J. Theobald (2013). How will biotic interactions influence climate change–induced range shifts? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1297:112–125. Google Scholar

  17. R. T. Holmesand S. K. Robinson (1988). Spatial patterns, foraging tactics, and diets of ground-foraging birds in a northern hardwoods forest. Wilson Bulletin 100:377–394. Google Scholar

  18. R. T. Holmesand R. H. Sawyer (1975). Oxygen consumption in relation to ambient temperature in five species of forest-dwelling thrushes (Hylocichla and Catharus). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology 50:527–531. Google Scholar

  19. J. E. Jankowski S. K. Robinsonand D. J. Levey (2010). Squeezed at the top: Interspecific aggression may constrain elevational ranges in tropical birds. Ecology 91:1877–1884. Google Scholar

  20. D. E. Kroodsma (1989). Suggested experimental designs for song playbacks. Animal Behaviour 37:600–609. Google Scholar

  21. J. D. Lambertand K. P. McFarland (2004). Projecting effects of climate change on Bicknell's Thrush habitat in the northeastern United States. Vermont Institute of Natural Science (VINS), Woodstock, VT, USA. Google Scholar

  22. J. D. Lambert K. P. McFarland C. C. Rimmer S. D. Faccioand J. L. Atwood (2005). A practical model of Bicknell's Thrush distribution in the northeastern United States. Wilson Bulletin 117:1–11. Google Scholar

  23. J. D. Lambert D. I. King J. P. Buonaccorsiand L. S. Prout (2008). Decline of a New Hampshire Bicknell's Thrush population, 1993–2003. Northeastern Naturalist 15:607–618. Google Scholar

  24. F. A. La Sorteand W. Jetz (2010). Projected range contractions of montane biodiversity under global warming. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 277:3401–3410. Google Scholar

  25. D. E. Mackand W. Yong (2000). Swainson's Thrush (Catharus ustulatus). In The Birds of North America Online ( A. Poole Editor). Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA. doi: 10.2173/bna.540 Google Scholar

  26. K. J. McGowanand K. Corwan (Editors) (2008). The Second Atlas of Breeding Birds in New York State. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, USA. Google Scholar

  27. B. G. Murray (1971). The ecological consequences of interspecific territorial behavior in birds. Ecology 52:414–423. Google Scholar

  28. E. A. Nixon S. B. Holmesand A. W. Diamond (2001). Bicknell's Thrushes (Catharus bicknelli) in New Brunswick clear cuts: Their habitat associations and co-occurrence with Swainson's Thrushes (Catharus ustulatus). Wilson Bulletin 113:33–40. Google Scholar

  29. B. R. Noon (1981). The distribution of an avian guild along a temperate elevational gradient: The importance and expression of competition. Ecological Monographs 51:105–124. Google Scholar

  30. H. Oullet (1993). Bicknell's Thrush: Taxonomic status and distribution. Wilson Bulletin 105:545–572. Google Scholar

  31. J. Ralstonand J. J. Kirchman (2013). Predicted range shifts in North American boreal forest birds and the effect of climate change on genetic diversity in Blackpoll Warblers (Setophaga striata). Conservation Genetics 14:543–555. Google Scholar

  32. R Development Core Team (2014). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Google Scholar

  33. C. C. Rimmer K. P. McFarland J. Townsend W. G. Ellisonand J. E. Goetz (2015). Bicknell's Thrush (Catharus bicknelli). In The Birds of North America Online ( A. Poole Editor). Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA. doi: 10.2173/bna.592 Google Scholar

  34. N. L. Rodenhouse S. N. Matthews K. P. McFarland J. D. Lambert L. R. Iverson A. Prasad T. S. Sillettand R. T. Holmes (2008). Potential effects of climate change on birds of the Northeast. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 13:517–540. Google Scholar

  35. C. H. Sekercioglu S. H. Schneider J. P. Fayand S. R. Loarie (2008). Climate change, elevational range shifts, and bird extinctions. Conservation Biology 22:140–150. Google Scholar

  36. C. D. Thomas (2010). Climate, climate change and range boundaries. Diversity and Distributions 16:488–495. Google Scholar

  37. J. M. Townsend C. C. Rimmerand K. P. McFarland (2009). Investigating the limiting factors of a rare, vulnerable species: Bicknell's Thrush. In Tundra to Tropics: Connecting Birds, Habitats and People ( T. D. Rich C. Arizmendi D. Demarestand C. Thompson Editors). Proceedings of the 4th International Partners in Flight Conference, McAllen, TX, USA. Google Scholar

  38. M. S. Wisz J. Pottier W. D. Kissling L. Pellissier J. Lenoir C. F. Damgaard C. F. Dormann M. C. Forchhammer J.-A. Grytnes A. Guisan R. K. Heikkinen et al . (2013). The role of biotic interactions in shaping distributions and realised assemblages of species: Implications for species distribution modelling. Biological Reviews 88:15–30. Google Scholar

Benjamin G. Freeman and Graham Montgomery "Interspecific aggression by the Swainson's Thrush ( Catharus ustulatus) may limit the distribution of the threatened Bicknell's Thrush ( Catharus bicknelli) in the Adirondack Mountains," The Condor 118(1), (23 December 2015).
Received: 20 August 2015; Accepted: 1 October 2015; Published: 23 December 2015

Back to Top